STYLE, INTERPRETATION AND THE ARTISTIC IDEAL

The question of style now came up. "I am not in favor of 'labeling' the

concert artist, of calling him a 'lyric' or a 'dramatic' or some other

kind of a player. If he is an artist in the real sense he controls all

styles." Then, in answer to another question: "Nothing can express music

but music itself. Tradition in interpretation does not mean a

cut-and-dried set of rules handed down; it is, or should be, a matter

of individual sentiment, of inner conviction. What makes one man an

artist and keeps another an amateur is a God-given instinct for the

artistically and musically right. It is not a thing to be explained, but

to be felt. There is often only a narrow line of demarcation between the

artistically right and wrong. Yet nearly every real artist will be found

to agree as to when and when not that boundary has been overstepped.

Sincerity and personality as well as disinterestedness, an expression of

himself in his art that is absolutely honest, these, I believe, are

ideals which every artist should cherish and try to realize. I believe,

furthermore, that these ideals will come more and more into their own;

that after the war there will be a great uplift, and that Art will

realize to the full its value as a humanizing factor in life." And as is

well known, no great artist of our day has done more toward the actual

realization of these ideals he cherishes than Fritz Kreisler himself.

X

Violin Mastery: Talks with Master Violinists and Teachers · 第 111 / 241 题