In the open space behind the Tribunal of the Basilica the latest

excavations (since 1898) have resulted in the discovery of a temple

which certainly was dedicated to the guardian goddess of the Roman

colony, Venus Pompeiana. At the time of the catastrophe of the year 63

it was thrown down, and was to have been completely rebuilt, as the

building stones lying around indicate. It would assuredly have been the

largest and most splendid sanctuary of the city, if the outbreak of

Vesuvius had not prevented the carrying out of the plan.

[Illustration: Fig. 38. The Temple of Fortune (p. 29).]

[Illustration: Fig. 39. The Temple of Isis (p. 29).]

[Illustration: Fig. 40. The smaller Theatre (p. 32).]

[Illustration: Fig. 41. The larger Theatre (p. 32).]

[Illustration: Fig. 42. Scene from a Comedy. Mosaic of Dioscurides (p.

32).]

Of first rank among the other public buildings are the two theatres,

which closely connected with each other lie between the _Forum

Triangulare_ and the Street of Stabiae (a broad flight of steps

designed for festive processions leads from the _Forum Triangulare_ to

the Theatres). The smaller theatre (fig. 40), formerly roofed over,

served probably for musical performances, while the larger (fig. 41)

was employed for scenic exhibitions. Of these figure 42, an extremely

fine mosaic from Pompeii may perhaps serve as a specimen. It is to be

observed that, as in the case of most theatres, the seats have at the

back a hollow for the feet of those sitting above. The broad low steps

of the lowest row were utilised for the arrangement of _bisellia_,

that is wide seats properly intended for two persons, the use of which

was a privilege of the Decurions. Above, on the edge of the enclosing

wall, stones are to be seen which served to carry the masts from which

awnings were stretched for protection against the glare of the sun. It

is to this that the promise _vela erunt_ refers in the advertisements

of the theatre.

[Illustration: Fig. 43. Interior view of the Amphitheatre (p. 34).]

[Illustration: Fig. 44. Barracks of the Gladiators (p. 36).]

[Illustration: Fig. 45. Weapons of Gladiators (p. 36).]

Together with the theatres should be named the amphitheatre, situated

at the southeast extremity of the city, a building of very great size,

which was calculated to meet the requirements of the neighbouring

towns as well. Apparently it originally lay without the walls, and

was included in the time of fortification only at a later period as

forming a point of danger. Seen from without the building produces

a comparatively mean impression (fig. 57), since to avoid having to

raise the outer walls too high the arena or fighting place has been

dug out (fig. 43). From the outside steps lead to the upper tiers,

the lower tiers are reached by means of steps from a vaulted corridor

which runs round the whole amphitheatre under the second tier. This

is interrupted in the middle of both the longer sides, on the west

by reason of a small entrance to the arena by which the corpses of

the slain gladiators were dragged out. To the arena itself two wide

entrances led from north and south, one of which, the southern, turns

at a right angle on account of its nearness to the city wall. At the

northern entrance a small separate passage could be made in order to

keep the spectators apart from the gladiators who passed in and out at

this point. This was effected by means of a latticed partition, for

which purpose stones with holes in them were used, which are still

to be seen. Small dark rooms at the entrances, provided with very

low doorways, may have served as cages for wild beasts. Here too, as

in the Theatre, the steps of the first row were broad and low, being

intended for the arrangement of _Bisellia_. The wall which separated

the spectators from the arena were found when first excavated to be

adorned with paintings, which are now indeed completely destroyed,

but are preserved in copies made immediately after their discovery.

Without exception they represent scenes from the Amphitheatre, partly

fights between wild beasts, partly combats of gladiators. (See fig. 56

as to which it is doubtful whether it was found in the amphitheatre;

the gladiator standing on the right being badly wounded has let fall

his shield; standing quietly he raises the thumb of the left hand to

entreat the mercy of the people, for only if he looks death in the

face unmoved can he hope to be granted his life; in our case his death

seems certain, for his opponent steps up to him with drawn dagger

to give him the _coup de grâce_.) On the breastwork wall traces were

still visible of a lattice by means of which the spectators were to be

protected against possible attacks of the wild beasts in the arena.

[Illustration: Fig. 46. Wall at the Stabian Baths (p. 37).]

[Illustration: Fig. 47. The Apodyterium (p. 37).]

In connection with the amphitheatre may be mentioned also the barracks

for gladiators, situated to the south of the large Theatre (fig. 44).

To all appearances the large space surrounded by columns belonged

originally to the Theatre, and was intended to afford protection to

visitors to the Theatre in case of rain occurring suddenly. But when

the passion for gladiatorial exhibitions had so prevailed that even

smaller cities thought themselves obliged to keep special bands of

gladiators, the second row of columns that no doubt originally existed

was done away with and in its place paltry cells erected for them.

That we have to do with gladiators and not, as has been supposed, with

soldiers, a garrison for Pompeii, has been indisputably proved by the

discovery of gladiators’ weapons (now in the Naples Museum, fig. 45 and

60) of paintings and _Graffiti_ relating to gladiators. The cells were

raised in two stories, and in such a way that the upper were approached

by means of a wooden gallery. In one cell on the west side a great set

of fetters was found used for chaining prisoners; in the same room, but

not as is commonly reported fastened in the fetters, some skeletons

were found, those therefore of prisoners who when the catastrophe

came had not been able to escape. The surrounding columns are painted

red and yellow, only the two centre ones of the east and west sides

are blue, perhaps because these served as marks in certain military

exercises.

[Illustration: Fig. 48. The Tepidarium of the Forum Baths (p. 38).]

[Illustration: Fig. 49. Arrangement of a Caldarium (p. 38).]

The baths too, which played so great a part in the life of the

ancients, must not be forgotten among the public places of resort.

Of large Public Baths three have up to the present time been found

in Pompeii, the so-called Central Baths, which at the time of the

eruption of Vesuvius were still in course of construction, the Baths

by the Forum, and the Stabian Baths, at the corner of the Stabiae

and Abbondanza streets. These last named are the best preserved, and

deserve on this account a more thorough consideration. We come first

into a large courtyard surrounded with pillars, the Palaestra, devoted

to gymnastic exercises; here there was a stone track constructed, for

rolling stone balls, further a swimming bath (_Natatio_), with the

dressingrooms appertaining thereto (fig. 46). The reliefs in stucco,

which are preserved on the outer walls of these rooms, merit special

notice. On the right of the principal entrance two doors lead to the

men’s bath, which consisted of the _Apodyterium_, where people took

off their clothes (the niches served to keep them in, fig. 47), the

_Frigidarium_ or cold bath, the _Tepidarium_ or lukewarm bath, and the

_Caldarium_ or hot bath. (Fig. 48 represents the Tepidarium of the

Baths near the Forum; here the heating is derived from a large brazier

presented by Vaccula.) Both these rooms received their heating through

the hollow pavement and hollow walls, i. e. the pavement rests on

small pilasters about two feet high, and the walls are overlaid with

tiles, which being provided with raised sidewalls form a kind of flue

on the wall (figs. 49 and 50). By this method the heat introduced from

beneath, could penetrate under the pavement and between the double

walls. Of late it is true this way of heating has been disputed.

[Illustration: Fig. 50. Section of the Caldarium (p. 38).]

[Illustration: Fig. 51. Ground Plan of the House of Pansa (p. 39).]

[Illustration: Fig. 52. Atrium Tuscanicum (p. 41).]

The women’s bath adjoins the men’s, with the same rooms required for

bathing; between the _Caldarium_ of the men’s bath and that of the

women’s bath lies the furnace-room; here were placed three large

caldrons for hot, tepid, and cold water. Of such a furnace-room and

the arrangement of caldrons an idea may also be formed from the well

preserved bathing plant excavated in a Roman villa at Bosco Reale

(where was made the great discovery of silverplate, now at Paris). This

has recently been set up at Pompeii, in a small house behind the Temple

of Jupiter in the street called Del Foro.

Besides these public bathing establishments there were of course

also in the better class of houses private baths which show the same

arrangements, though naturally more or less curtailed.

[Illustration: Fig. 53. Cave Canem (p. 40).]

[Illustration: Fig. 54. Doorknockers (p. 40).]

[Illustration: Fig. 55. Roman Dwellinghouse. Vista from the Atrium to

the Peristyle (p. 42).]

[Illustration: Fig. 56. Scene from the Amphitheatre (p. 35).]

[Illustration: Fig. 57. External View of the Amphitheatre (p. 34).]

[Illustration: Fig. 58. Iron Strongbox (p. 42).]

[Illustration: Fig. 59. Domestic Shrine (p. 42).]

The private houses are of course, according to the wealth of the

owners, of very various descriptions, and planned on a sometimes

more, sometimes less imposing and costly scale, since here one, there

another circumstance must have influenced the building of the house

and altered its form. Something however remains common to all, and out

of the variety it is possible to reconstruct the design of a standard

Pompeian house. The house has in general the form of a rectangle of

which the small side faces the street, see fig. 51. The door is in the

middle of this side, and is flanked right and left by one or two rooms,

which are either used as shops and then open outwards for their whole

width, or are entered from the interior and form part of the house.

Between these a passage leads from the door to the chief apartment

situated behind, viz., the _Atrium_. This passage is called _fauces_

or _prothyron_. In the superior class of houses the door is set back a

little so as to leave a free space in front, called _Vestibulum_. Then

there are usually two doors, one a wide folding-door corresponding in

size to the passage leading to the Atrium, and a smaller door at the

side intended for the _Ostiarius_, or porter, who could thus refuse

admittance to an importunate or unpleasant visitor, without exposing

the interior of the house to the gaze of those standing before the

door. A salutation such as _Have_ or _Ave_, “Hail” inlaid in the

threshold of the door, or a _Cave Canem_, “Beware of the Dog” with the

representation of a dog in mosaic (fig. 53) is a not unusual ornament

which meets the eye as one enters. A knocker on the door served to

summon the _ostiarius_. The _atrium_, a room usually square, contains

in the middle a rectangular tank sunk in the ground for the reception

of rainwater; for this an opening was left in the roof. Five classes

of _Atrium_ are generally distinguished. In the simplest, the _Atrium

Tuscanicum_, the roof sloping inwards was supported by two main beams

crossing the Atrium and two side beams resting on them (fig. 52; in

the new _Casa_ of Reg. V, Ins. IV the ancient construction of the roof

of the Atrium has been re-erected). If the opening thus formed was to

be large, or it was impossible on account of the breadth of the Atrium

to leave the weight of the roof to rest only on two beams, pillars

were placed under the four points of junction and on these pillars the

beams were laid; this is the _Atrium Tetrastylum_. If it was desirable

to make the aperture still larger, additional pillars were employed

besides the four at the corners, so that regular halls with colonnades

were produced (_Atrium Corinthiacum_). If the roof sloped outwards so

that above the _impluvium_ there rose walls supported by the principal

beams or the pillars, the Atrium was called _displuviatum_, from the

fact that in this case the rain flowed away outwards. Finally the

_atrium testudinatum_, a very rare form at Pompeii, had its roof

equally sloping outwards, but was devoid of the quadrangular opening.

This opening is called _compluvium_; the name _impluvium_ is given

to the tank sunk beneath to receive the water, and out of which the

water was conducted by pipes into the reservoirs under the atrium.

For protection against the intrusion of unbidden visitors who might

without difficulty let themselves down from the roof into the room

through the _compluvium_, the opening could be closed beneath by means

of an iron grating. On both sides of the _Atrium_, which receives

its light from above, are placed mostly small chambers, storerooms

or sleeping apartments; the last one on each side usually opened its

whole width to the atrium and is called _Ala_. Here in Patrician

houses of distinction the representations of ancestors were generally

placed. Opposite the entrance lies the _Tablinum_, usually opening

with full width on the _Atrium_, and closed only by curtains (fig.

55). This was specially the room of the master of the house, here he

kept his valuable documents, here he received visits, in front of the

_Tablinum_; in the _Atrium_ is as a rule the place for keeping the

_Arca_, or strongbox, made of iron, often artistically decorated, and

let into a huge stone, to prevent its being stolen (fig. 58). Past the

_Tablinum_ a narrow passage generally leads into the back rooms of the

house, which, grouped around the Peristyle, an oblong quadrangular

court surrounded by columns, comprising not only livingrooms and

bedchambers, but also diningrooms, often different ones for winter and

for summer. These are for the most part rather small, sufficing only

for the arrangement of the three couches around the little table, from

which the _Triclinium_ has its name. In this part a little on one side

is usually found the kitchen with other rooms required for domestic

purposes, and placed in close proximity to the kitchen for the sake

of supply and discharge of water. The wealthier establishments have

also one of the chambers lying round the Peristyle fitted up as a kind

of domestic chapel for the worship of the _Lares_, if there is not a

special _Sacrarium_ erected in the _Atrium_ for this purpose. Houses

of more moderate pretensions content themselves with having their

household gods, the _Lares_ and the serpents sacred to them, painted

in the kitchen above or near the hearth, in order to offer sacrifice

to them there (figs. 59 and 62). From the Peristyle we pass on further

to the garden, in which, where the owner was a rich man, there is

likewise no lack of architectural adornments, airy halls and porticoes.

Upper stories were generally in little favour, with the increase of

population however they could not have been dispensed with. For the

most part they were let, as a rule with the shops situated on the

street, on which account stairs leading upwards are often found in the

shops; in wealthier establishments the upper chambers were allotted to

the slaves. These upper stories, just as in our mediaeval towns, often

project considerably over the street; one such projecting apartment, as

was stated above, is well preserved (fig. 61).

[Illustration: Fig. 60. Helmets for Gladiators (p. 36).]

[Illustration: Fig. 61. House with _maenianum_ (p. 43).]

[Illustration: Fig. 62. Domestic Altar (p. 42).]

How was the Pompeian house decorated? Let us begin with the floor. In

most houses the flooring is provided with _opus signinum_, that is

pieces of tile are pressed into a mass of stucco and then the surface

is polished; in better houses their place is taken by mosaic, generally

only black and white, and comprising only patterns and ornaments;

more rarely a coloured picture is produced with smaller cubes in the

middle of the room. Quite peculiarly rich in mosaics, and indeed such

as artistically belong to the most splendid that have come down to

us in this department of art, was the so-called Casa del Fauno, in

which was discovered the famous Battle of Alexander, now in the Naples

Museum (fig. 64). The irresistible onset of the Greeks who in spite

of inferiority in number drive the Persians in headlong flight before

them is expressed with unsurpassable power. Alexander whose helmet has

fallen from his head in the impetuous attack has just transfixed with

a powerful thrust of his spear one of the leaders of the Persian host,

who was in the act of leaping from his dying horse and saving himself

on a fresh one offered to him by a faithful follower. His fall arouses

in the king who stands in his chariot, the deepest sympathy, so that

in his sorrow for his general’s death he almost loses sight of his own

escape. His charioteer however thinks only of bringing the chariot and

his lord to safety over dead and dying. From the same house comes also

the mosaic threshold in the Naples Museum, a portion of which we give

in figure 63. Leaves and fruits of all kinds are joined to a cylinder

held together by rings and garnished with various masks.

Figure 65 recommends itself by remarkable fidelity to nature. A cat has

seized a bird (apparently a partridge) with the intention of strangling

it. The cat probably belongs to the species of wild cats, since cats

as domestic animals were not common among the Greeks and Romans

before the fourth century of our era (hence is explained the fact that

no skeleton of a cat has been met with among the ruins of Pompeii).

Below two ducks are swimming, and mussels and other aquatic animals

are represented. At Pompeii too mosaic had begun to be employed for

the covering of walls, especially beside fountains. The paving of the

ground with slabs of marble, a practice very common at Rome since the

time of Sulla, seems to have been comparatively rare at Pompeii.

[Illustration: Fig. 63. Mosaic Threshold (p. 44).]

[Illustration: Fig. 64. Alexander’s Battle (p. 43).]

The eyes of visitors will be attracted by the walls even more than

by the pavements. Although, as said before, the greatest number of

the wall-paintings discovered have been cut out and brought to the

Naples Museum, yet sufficient material exists in Pompeii also to form

a judgment as to the effect of the Pompeian wall-painting, especially

in the more recently excavated houses, in which the colours are still

more fresh. (For the removal of wall-paintings a wooden frame is

placed over and around the pictures, and the stones are taken away from

behind till the stucco is reached; then plaster is poured in at the

back of the picture, and so the whole becomes one single mass and can

be removed.) We must not however forget that the rooms in which the

paintings are found have at the present day a much more glaring light

than in antiquity, a circumstance not without influence on the effect

of the painting.

[Illustration: Fig. 65. Pompeian Mosaic (p. 44).]

[Illustration: Fig. 66. Wall Decoration of the First Style (Casa di

Sallustio) (p. 47).]

[Illustration: Fig. 67. Wall Decoration of the Third Style (House of

Spurius Mesor) (p. 48).]

[Illustration: Fig. 68. Process of Plastering (p. 49).]

According to A. Mau four consecutive styles are to be distinguished.

1. Pre-Roman Period: Imitation of marble incrustation by means of

plastic stucco work; no pictures (fig. 66).

2. Period of the Republic: Imitation of Marble incrustation by means

of simple painting, together with representation of architecture, not

fantastical but as it might actually exist. This style is however but

scantily represented at Pompeii.

3. Period of the Early Empire, to about fifty years after Christ:

Egyptianising ornamental style distinguished by beautiful and pure

forms, and delicate, finely distinguished colours (fig. 67).

4. Ornamental Style of the last period of Pompeii, with special

preference for architectural painting, fantastically slender and of a

playfully ornamental fashion. The examples of this style are in Pompeii

by far the most numerous (fig. 69).

Above the plinth of uniform shape the walls are for the most part

divided into panels, which usually are painted alternately yellow and

red; in their midst they have figures of various kinds floating in

the air, women, satyrs, Loves, Victories and such like, or they are

adorned with imitations of easelpictures, the subjects being taken from

mythology. Numerous too are scenes from every day life, still more

numerous landscapes; the historical motive is as yet only very rarely

indicated. Very frequently mythological figures are introduced as

engaged in the avocations of daily life in the midst of the fantastical

architecture which covers the walls as ornament. The artistic value

is naturally very different, but in general it must be admitted that

the vividness of colour, the lightness of touch in creations which

are due assuredly to no famous artist cannot be sufficiently admired.

As to the process by which the wall-paintings were executed the most

multifarious conjectures were formerly made; now on the contrary the

view universally adopted is that we have to do almost exclusively with

fresco painting, i. e. painting on fresh plaster, only that here and

there recourse was also had to painting in tempera (fig. 68).

Some wall-paintings still in their original position will be dealt with

later when we come to speak of the respective houses; a few examples

out of the rich treasure removed to the Museo Nazionale in Naples may

here suffice.

[Illustration: Fig. 69. Wall Decoration. Fourth Style (p. 49).]

[Illustration: Fig. 70. Sacrifice of Iphigenia (p. 49).]

Pompeii · 第 2 / 6 段