greatest opportunity in the Anglo-American law of contracts. The
constantly increasing list of theoretical anomalies shows that
analysis and restatement can avail us no longer. Indeed the lucid
statement of Williston but emphasizes the inadequacy of analysis even
when eked out by choice from among competing views and analytical
restatements of judicial dogma in the light of results. Projects for
"restatement of the law" are in the air. But a restatement of what
has never been stated is an impossibility and as yet there is no
authoritative statement of what the law of consideration is. Nothing
could be gained by a statement of it with all its imperfections on its
head and any consistent analytical statement would require the undoing
of much that the judges have done quietly beneath the surface for
making promises more widely enforceable. Given an attractive
philosophical theory of enforcement of promises, our courts in a new
period of growth will begin to shape the law thereby and judicial
empiricism and legal reason will bring about a workable system along
new lines. The possibilities involved may be measured if we compare
our old law of torts with its hard and fast series of nominate wrongs,
its distinctions growing out of procedural requirements of trespass
and trespass on the case and its crude idea of liability, flowing
solely from causation, with the law of torts at the end of the
nineteenth century after it had been molded by the theory of liability
as a corollary of fault. Even if we must discard the conception that
tort liability may flow only from fault, the generalization did a
service of the first magnitude not only to legal theory but to the
actual administration of justice. No less service will be rendered by
the twentieth-century philosophical theory, whatever it is, which puts
the jural postulate of civilized society in our day and place with
respect to good faith, and its corollary as to promises, in acceptable
form, and furnishes jurist and judge and lawmaker with a logical
critique, a workable measure of decision and an ideal of what the law
seeks to do, whereby to carry forward the process of enlarging the
domain of legally enforceable promises and thus enlarging on this side
the domain of legal satisfaction of human claims.
Bibliography
LECTURE I
Plato (B. C. 427-347), Republic.
----, Laws.
Translations in Jowett's Plato. The translation of the
Republic is published separately.
Pseudo-Plato, Minos.
Now generally considered not to be a genuine work of Plato's
and variously dated from as early as c. 337 B. C. to as late
as c. 250 B. C. There is a convenient translation in Bohn's
Libraries.
Aristotle (B. C. 384-322), Nicomachean Ethics.
Convenient translation by Browne in Bohn's Libraries.
----, Politics.
Translation by Jowett should be used.
Reference may be made to Berolzheimer, System der Rechts-
und Wirthschaftsphilosophie, II, Sec.Sec. 13-16 (World's Legal
Philosophies, 46-77); Hildenbrand, Geschichte und System
der Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie, Sec.Sec. 1-121.
Cicero (B. C. 106-43), De Legibus.
Reference may be made to Berolzheimer, System der Rechts-
und Wirthschaftsphilosophie, II, Sec.Sec. 17-20 (World's Legal
Philosophies, 78-92); Hildenbrand, Geschichte und System der
Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie, Sec.Sec. 131-135, 143-147; Voigt,
Das Ius Naturale, aequum et bonum und Ius Gentium der Roemer,
I, Sec.Sec. 16, 35-41, 44-64, 89-96.
Thomas Aquinas (1225 or 1227-1274), Summa Theologiae.
Convenient translation of the parts relating to law in
Aquinas Ethicus.
Reference may be made to Berolzheimer, System der Rechts-
und Wirthschaftsphilosophie, II, Sec.Sec. 21-23 (World's Legal
Philosophies, 93-111).
Oldendorp, Iuris naturalis gentium et ciuilis [Greek: eisagoge]
(1539).
Hemmingius (Henemingsen) De Iure naturale apodictica methodus (1562).
Winckler, Principiorum iuris libri V (1615).
These are collected conveniently in Kaltenborn, Die Vorlaeufer
des Hugo Grotius.
Reference may be made to Berolzheimer, System der Rechts-
und Wirthschaftsphilosophie, II, Sec. 24 (World's Legal
Philosophies, 112-114); Hinrichs, Geschichte der Rechts-
und Staatsprincipien seit der Reformation, I, 1-60;
Gierke, Johannes Althusius, 2 ed., 18-49, 142-162, 321.
Soto, De justitia et iure (1589).
Suarez, De legibus ac deo legislatore (1619).
Reference may be made to Figgis, Studies of Political Thought
from Gerson to Grotius, Lect. V.
Grotius, De iure belli et pacis (1625).
Whewell's edition with an abridged translation is convenient.
Pufendorf, De jure naturae et gentium (1672).
Kennet's translation (1703) may be found in several editions.
Burlamaqui, Principes du droit naturel (1747).
Nugent's translation is convenient.
Wolff, Institutiones juris naturae et gentium (1750).
Rutherforth, Institutes of Natural Law (1754-1756).
Vattel, Le droit des gens, Preliminaires (1758).
There are many translations of Vattel.
Rousseau, Contrat social (1762).
Tozer's translation is convenient.
Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Introduction, sect.
II (1765).
Reference may be made to Berolzheimer, System der Rechts-
und Wirthschaftsphilosophie, II, Sec.Sec. 25-27, 29 (World's Legal
Philosophies, 115-134, 141-156); Hinrichs, Geschichte der
Rechts- und Staatsprincipien seit der Reformation, I, 60-274,
II, III, 1-318; Korkunov, General Theory of Law, transl. by
Hastings, Sec. 7; Charmont, La renaissance du droit naturel,
10-43.
Hobbes, Leviathan (1651).
Spinoza, Ethica (1674).
----, Tractatus theologico-politicas (1670).
Elwes' translation of the two last in Bohn's Libraries must
be used with caution.
Bentham, Principles of Morals and Legislation (1780).
A convenient reprint is published by the Clarendon Press.
----, Theory of Legislation. (Originally published in French, 1820).
Translated by Hildreth (1864), and in many editions.
Mill, On Liberty (1859).
Courtney's edition (1892) is convenient.
Reference may be made to Duff, Spinoza's Political and
Ethical Philosophy; Berolzheimer, System der Rechts- und
Wirthschaftsphilosophie, II, Sec. 28 (World's Legal Philosophies,
134-141); Dicey, Law and Public Opinion in England, Lect. 6;
Albee, History of English Utilitarianism; Stephen, The
English Utilitarians; Solari, L'idea individuale e l'idea
sociale nel diritto privato, Sec.Sec. 31-36.
Kant, Metaphysische Anfangsgruende der Rechtslehre (2 ed. 1798).
Translated by Hastie as "Kant's Philosophy of Law" (1887).
Fichte, Grundlage des Naturrechts (1796, new ed. by Medicus, 1908).
Translated by Kroeger as "Fichte's Science of Rights" (1889).
Hegel, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (1821), ed. by Gans
(1840), new ed. by Lasson (1911). Translated by Dyde as "Hegel's
Philosophy of Right" (1896). This translation must be used cautiously.
Krause, Abriss des Systemes der Philosophie des Rechtes (1828).
Ahrens, Cours de droit naturel (1837, 8 ed. 1892). Twenty-four
editions in seven languages. The German 6th edition (Naturrecht,
1870-1871) contains important matter not in the French editions.
Green, Principles of Political Obligation. Lectures delivered in
1879-1880. Reprinted from his Complete Works (1911).
Lorimer, Institutes of Law (2 ed. 1880).
Lasson, Lehrbuch der Rechtsphilosophie (1882).
Miller, Lectures on the Philosophy of Law (1884).
Boistel, Cours de philosophie du droit (1870, new ed. 1899).
Herkless, Lectures on Jurisprudence (1901).
Brown, The Underlying Principles of Modern Legislation (1912).
Mention may be made of Beaussire, Les principes du droit
(1888); Beudant, Le droit individuel et l'etat (1891); Carle,
La vita del diritto (2 ed. 1890); Dahn, Rechtsphilosophische
Studien (1883); Giner y Calderon, Filosofia del derecho
(1898); Harms, Begriff, Formen und Grundlegung der
Rechtsphilosophie (1889); Hennebicq, Philosophie de droit et
droit naturel (1897); Herbart, Analytische Beleuchtung des
Naturrechts und der Moral (1836); Jouffroy, Cours de droit
naturel (5 ed. 1876); Kirchmann, Grundbegriffe des Rechts
und der Moral (2 ed. 1873); Krause, Das System der
Rechtsphilosophie (posthumous, ed. by Roeder, 1874); Miraglia,
Filosofia del diritto (3 ed. 1903, transl. in Modern Legal
Philosophy Series, 1912); Roeder, Grundzuege des Naturrechts
oder der Rechtsphilosophie (2 ed. 1860); Rosmini, Filosofia
del diritto (2 ed. 1865); Rothe, Traite de droit naturel,
theorique et applique (1884); Schuppe, Grundzuege der Ethik
und Rechtsphilosophie (1881); Stahl, Philosophie des Rechts
(5 ed. 1878); Tissot, Introduction historique et philosophique
a l'etude du droit (1875); Trendelenburg, Naturrecht auf dem
Grunde der Ethik (1868); Vareilles-Sommieres, Les principes
fondamentaux du droit (1889); Wallaschek, Studien zur
Rechtsphilosophie (1889).
Reference may be made to Gray, Nature and Sources of the Law,
Sec.Sec. 7-9; Bryce, Studies in History and Jurisprudence, Essay
12; Pollock, Essays in Jurisprudence and Ethics, 1-30;
Korkunov, General Theory of Law, translated by Hastings, Sec. 4;
Bergbohm, Jurisprudenz und Rechtsphilosophie, Sec.Sec. 6-15; Pound,
The Scope and Purpose of Sociological Jurisprudence, 24
Harvard Law Rev., 501; Pound, the Philosophy of Law in
America, Archiv fuer Rechts- und Wirthschaftsphilosophie, VII,
213, 285.
Jhering, Der Zweck im Recht (1877-1883, 4 ed. 1904). The first volume
is translated by Husik under the title "Law as a Means to an End"
(1913).
Jhering, Scherz und Ernst in die Jurisprudenz (1884, 9 ed. 1904).
Reference may be made to the appendices to Jhering, Law as a
Means to an End, transl. by Husik; Berolzheimer, System der
Rechts- und Wirthschaftsphilosophie, II, Sec. 43 (World's Legal
Philosophies, 327-351); Korkunov, General Theory of Law,
translated by Hastings, Sec.Sec. 13-14; Tanon, L'evolution du droit
et la conscience sociale (3 ed. 1911), pt. I, ch. 3.
Stammler, Ueber die Methode der geschichtlichen Rechtstheorie (1888).
----, Wirthschaft und Recht (1896, 2 ed. 1905).
----, Die Gesetzmaessigkeit in Rechtsordnung und Volkswirthschaft
(1902).
----, Lehre von dem rechtigen Rechte (1902).
----, Systematische Theorie der Rechtswissenschaft (1911).
----, Rechts- und Staatstheorien der Neuzeit (1917).
Del Vecchio, The Formal Bases of Law, translated by Lisle (1914).
A translation of I presupposti filosofici della nozione del diritto
(1905), Il concetto del diritto (1906, reprinted 1912), Il concetto
della natura e il principio del diritto (1908).
For critiques of Stammler, see Berolzheimer, System der
Rechts- und Wirthschaftsphilosophie, II, Sec. 48 (World's Legal
Philosophies, 398-422); Kantorowicz, Zur Lehre vom richtigen
Recht; Croce, Historical Materialism and the Economics of
Karl Marx, ch. 2; Geny, Science et technique en droit prive
positif, II, 127-130; Binder, Rechtsbegriff und Rechtsidee
(1915); Binder, Kritische und metaphysische Rechtsphilosophie,
Archiv fuer Rechts- und Wirthschaftsphilosophie, IX, 142, 267;
Vinogradoff, Common Sense in Law, ch. 9.
Kohler, Rechtsphilosophie und Universalrechtsgeschichte, in
Holtzendorff, Enzyklopaedie der Rechtswissenschaft, I (6 ed. 1904,
7 ed. 1913). (Not in prior editions.)
Kohler, Lehrbuch der Rechtsphilosophie (1909, 2 ed. 1917). Translated
by Albrecht as "Philosophy of Law" (1914).
Kohler, Moderne Rechtsprobleme (1907, 2 ed. 1913).
Berolzheimer, System der Rechts-und Wirthschaftsphilosophie
(1904-1907). Vol. II, history of juristic thought, translated by
Jastrow (somewhat abridged) under the title "The World's Legal
Philosophies" (1912), Vol. III, general system of legal and economic
philosophy, Vol. IV, philosophy of interests of substance, Vol. V,
philosophy of criminal law, are important for our purposes.
See also Berolzheimer, Rechtsphilosophische Studien (1903);
Barillari, Diritto e filosofia (1910-1912); Kohler, Das Recht
(1909); Kohler, Recht und Persoenlichkeit in die Kultur der
Gegenwart (1914).
Radbruch, Grundzuege der Rechtsphilosophie (1914).
Miceli, Principii di filosofia del diritto (1914).
Tourtoulon, Principes philosophiques de l'histoire du droit
(1908-1920).
Demogue, Notions fondamentales du droit prive (1911).
Geny, Methode d'interpretation et sources en droit prive positif
(1899, 2 ed. 1919). A book of the first importance.
----, Science et technique en droit prive positif (1913).
Duguit, L'etat, le droit objectif et la loi positive (1901).
----, Le droit social, le droit individuel et la transformation de
l'etat (2 ed. 1911).
----, Les transformations generales du droit prive (1912). Translated
in Continental Legal History Series, Vol. XI, ch. 3.
----, Law and the State (1917).
Reference may be made to Modern French Legal Philosophy
(1916) in the Modern Legal Philosophy Series; Jung, Das
Problem des natuerlichen Rechts (1912).
See also Boucaud, Qu'est-ce que le droit naturel (1906);
Charmont, La renaissance du droit naturel (1910); Charmont,
Le droit et l'esprit democratique (1908); Djuvara, Le
fondement du phenomene juridique (1913); Fabreguettes, La
logique judiciaire et l'art de juger (1914); Leroy, La loi
(1908).
Compare Cathrein, Recht, Naturrecht und Positives Recht
(1901).
See also Cohen, Jus naturale redivivum, Philosophical Rev.,
XXV, 761 (1916).
Spencer, Justice (1891).
See also Anzilotti, La filosofia del diritto e la sociologia
(1907); Brugi, Introduzione enciclopedica alle scienze
giuridiche e sociale (4 ed. 1907, 1 ed. 1890); Cosentini,
Filosofia del diritto e sociologia (1905); Cosentini,
Criticismo e positivismo nella filosofia del diritto (1912);
Daguanno, La genesi e l'evoluzione del diritto civile (1890);
Eleutheropoulos, Rechtsphilosophie, Sociologie und Politik
(1908); Fragapane, Obbietto e limiti della filosofia del
diritto (1897); Levi, Il diritto naturale nella filosofia di
R. Ardigo (1904); Nardi Greco, Sociologia giuridica (1906);
Porchat, Sociologia e direito (1902); Ratto, Sociologia e
filosofia del diritto (1894); Vadale Papale, La filosofia del
diritto a base sociologica (1885); Vander Eycken, Methode
positive de l'interpretation juridique (1907).
Post, Der Ursprung des Rechts (1876).
----, Bausteine fuer eine allgemeine Rechtswissenschaft (1880).
----, Die Grundlagen des Rechts und die Grundzuege seiner
Entwickelungsgeschichte (1884).
Kuhlenbeck, Natuerliche Grundlagen des Rechts (1905).
A discussion of fundamental problems of jurisprudence from
the Darwinian standpoint.
Richard, Origine de l'idee de droit (1892).
Vaccaro, Les bases sociologiques du droit et de l'etat (1898).
Translation of Le basi del diritto e dello stato (1893). A theory
of law as the outcome of class struggles.
For critiques of the foregoing, see Tanon, L'evolution du
droit et la conscience sociale (3 ed. 1911); Tourtoulon,
Principes philosophiques de l'histoire du droit (1908-1920);
Charmont, La renaissance du droit naturel (1910).
Tarde, Les transformations du droit (6 ed. 1909). First published in
1894.
Vanni, Lezioni di filosofia del diritto (3 ed. 1908). First published
in 1901-1902.
See also Bonucci, L'orientazione psicologica dell' etica e
della filosofia del diritto (1907); Bozi, Die Weltanschauung
der Jurisprudenz (1907, 2 ed. 1911); Bozi, Die Schule der
Jurisprudenz (1910); Cruet, La vie du droit et l'impuissance
des lois (1914); Grasserie, Principes sociologiques du droit
civil (1906); Jellinek, Die sozialethische Bedeutung von
Recht, Unrecht und Strafe (2 ed. 1908, 1st ed. 1878);
Lagorgette, Le fondement du droit (1907); Miceli, Le fonti
del diritto dal punto di vista psichico-sociale (1905);
Miceli, Lezioni di filosofia del diritto (1908).
Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harvard Law Review, 467 (1897);
Collected Papers, 167-202.
Ehrlich, Soziologie und Jurisprudenz (1903).
Wurzel, Das juristische Denken, 98-102 (1904). Translated in The
Science of Legal Method (Modern Legal Philosophy Series, Vol. 9,
421-428).
Gnaeus Flavius (Kantorowicz), Der Kampf um die Rechtswissenschaft
(1906).
Kantorowicz, Rechtswissenschaft und Soziologie (1911).
Kelsen, Ueber Grenzen zwischen juristischer und soziologischer Methode
(1911).
Brugeilles, Le droit et la sociologie (1910).
Rolin, Prolegomenes a la science du droit (1911).
Ehrlich, Erforschung des lebenden Rechts, in Schmoller's Jahrbuch fuer
Gesetzgebung, XXV, 190 (1911).
----, Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts (1913).
----, Das lebende Recht der Voelker der Bukowina (1913).
Page, Professor Ehrlich's Czernowitz Seminar of Living Law,
Proceedings of Fourteenth Annual Meeting of Association of American
Law Schools, 46 (1914).
Cosentini, Filosofia del diritto (1914).
Ehrlich, Die juristische Logik (1918).
Kornfeld, Allgemeine Rechtslehre und Jurisprudenz (1920).
See also Cosentini, La reforme de la legislation civile
(1913) (revised and augmented translation of La riforma
della legislazione civile, 1911); Kornfeld, Soziale
Machtverhaeltnisse, Grundzuege einer allgemeinen Lehre vom
positiven Rechte auf soziologischer Grundlage (1911); Levi,
La societe et l'ordre juridique (1911); Levi, Contributi
ad una teoria filosofica dell' ordine giuridico (1914).
LECTURE II
Miller, The Data of Jurisprudence, ch. 6.
Salmond, Jurisprudence, Sec. 9.
Pulszky, Theory of Law and Civil Society, Sec. 173.
Bentham, Theory of Legislation, Principles of the Civil Code, pt. I,
ch. 1-7.
Holland, Jurisprudence, ch. 6.
Kant, Philosophy of Law (Hastie's translation) 45-46.
Spencer, Justice, ch. 5-6.
Willoughby, Social Justice, ch. 2.
Paulsen, Ethics (Thilly's translation), ch. 9.
Gareis, Vom Begriff Gerechtigkeit.
Demogue, Notions fondamentales de droit prive, 119-135.
Picard, Le droit pur, liv. 9.
Pound, The End of Law as Developed in Legal Rules and Doctrines, 27
Harvard Law Review, 195.
Holmes, Common Law, Lect. 1.
Post, Ethnologische Jurisprudenz, II, Sec.Sec. 58-59.
Fehr, Hammurapi und das Salische Recht, 135-138.
Ames, Law and Morals, 22 Harvard Law Review, 97.
Voigt, Das Ius naturale, aequum et bonum und Ius Gentium der Roemer, I,
321-323.
Stephen, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, 189-255.
Maine, Early History of Institutions (American ed.), 398-400.
Ritchie, Natural Rights, ch. 12.
Demogue, Notions fondamentales de droit prive, 63-110, 136-142.
Jhering, Scherz und Ernst in die Jurisprudenz (10 ed.), 408-425.
Pound, Liberty of Contract, 18 Yale Law Journal, 454.
----, The End of Law as Developed in Juristic Thought, 27 Harvard Law
Review, 605, 30 Harvard Law Review, 201.
Berolzheimer, The World's Legal Philosophies, Sec.Sec. 17-24.
Figgis, Studies of Political Thought from Gerson to Grotius, Lect. 6.
Berolzheimer, The World's Legal Philosophies, Sec.Sec. 25-27.
Hobbes, Leviathan, ch. 15.
Berolzheimer, The World's Legal Philosophies, Sec. 29.
Korkunov, General Theory of Law (translated by Hastings), Sec. 7.
Ritchie, Natural Rights, ch. 3.
Charmont, La renaissance de droit naturel, 10-43.
Berolzheimer, The World's Legal Philosophies, Sec.Sec. 35-37.
Korkunov, General Theory of Law (translated by Hastings), 320-322.
Gray, Nature and Sources of the Law, Sec. 58.
Berolzheimer, The World's Legal Philosophies, Sec. 28.
Mill, On Liberty, ch. 4.
Dicey, Law and Public Opinion in England, Lect. 6.
Berolzheimer, The World's Legal Philosophies, Sec.Sec. 43-48, 52.
Stammler, Wesen des Rechts und der Rechtswissenschaft (in
Systematische Rechtswissenschaft, i-lix).
Kohler, Rechtsphilosophie und Universalrechtsgeschichte, Sec.Sec. 13-16,
33-34, 51.
LECTURE III
Geny, Methode d'interpretation et sources en droit prive positif (2
ed. 1919).
Vander Eycken, Methode positive de l'interpretation juridique (1907).
Mallieux, L'Exegese des codes (1908).
Ransson, Essai sur l'art de juger (1912).
See Wigmore, Problems of Law, 65-101; Pound, The Enforcement
of Law, 20 Green Bag, 401; Pound, Courts and Legislation, 7
American Political Science Review, 361-383.
Science of Legal Method, Modern Legal Philosophy Series, Vol. 9
(1917).
Gnaeus Flavius (Kantorowicz), Der Kampf um die Rechtswissenschaft
(1906).
Fuchs, Recht und Wahrheit in unserer heutigen Justiz (1908).
----, Die gemeinschaedlichkeit der konstruktiven Jurisprudenz (1909).
Oertmann, Gesetzeszwang und Richterfreiheit (1909).
Rumpf, Gesetz und Richter (1906).
Bruett, Die Kunst der Rechtsanwendung (1907).
Gmelin, Quousque? Beitraege zur soziologischen Rechtsfindung (1910).
Reichel, Gesetz und Richterspruch (1915).
Jellinek, Gesetz, Gesetzesanwendung und Zweckmaessigkeitserwaegung
(1913).
Kuebl, Das Rechtsgefuehl (1913).
Heck, Gesetzesauslegung und Interessenjurisprudenz (1914).
Stampe, Grundriss der Wertbewegungslehre (1912, 1919).
See Kohler, Lehrbuch des buergerlichen Rechts, I, Sec.Sec. 38-40;
Austin, Jurisprudence (3 ed.), 1023-1036; Pound, Spurious
Interpretation, 7 Columbia Law Review, 379; Gray, Nature
and Sources of the Law, Sec.Sec. 370-399; Somlo, Juristische
Grundlehre, Sec.Sec. 110-122; Stammler, Rechts- und Staatstheorien
der Neuzeit, Sec. 18; Pound, Introduction to English Translation
of Saleilles, Individualization of Punishment; Saleilles,
Individualization of Punishment, translated by Jastrow, ch.
9; Pound, Administrative Applications of Legal Standards, 44
Rep. American Bar Assn., 445; Laun, Das freie Ermessen und
seine Grenzen (1910).
LECTURE IV
Holmes, Collected Papers, 49-116 (1920).
Baty, Vicarious Liability (1916).
Hasse, Die Culpa des roemischen Rechts (2 ed. 1838).
Jhering, Der Schuldmoment im roemischen Privatrecht (1867).
Ruemelin, Schadensersatz ohne Verschulden (1910).
Triandafil, L'Idee de faute et l'idee de risque comme fondement de la
responsabilite (1914).
See Binding, Die Normen und ihre Uebertretung, I, Sec.Sec. 50-51;
Meumann, Prolegomena zu einem System des Vermoegensrechts, 80
ff. (1903); Duguit in Progress of Continental Law in the
Nineteenth Century (Continental Legal History Series, Vol.
XI), 124-128; Geny, Risque et responsabilite, Revue
trimestrielle de droit civil, I, 812; Rolin, Responsabilite
sans faute, Revue de droit international et legislation
comparee, XXXVIII, 64; Demogue, Fault, Risk and Apportionment
of Risk in Responsibility, 15 Illinois Law Review, 369;
Thayer, Liability Without Fault, 29 Harvard Law Review, 801;
Smith, Tort and Absolute Liability, 30 Harvard Law Review,
241, 319, 409; Bohlen, The Rule in Rylands v. Fletcher, 59
University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 298, 373, 423; Isaacs,
Fault and Liability, 31 Harvard Law Review, 954.
LECTURE V
Ely, Property and Contract in Their Relation to the Distribution of
Wealth, I, 51-93, 132-258, 295-443, II, 475-549.
Hobson and Others, Property, Its Rights and Duties, Historically,
Philosophically and Religiously Considered (2 ed.), essays 1-3, 5-8.
Green, Principles of Political Obligation, Sec.Sec. 211-231.
Miller, Lectures on the Philosophy of Law, Lect. 5.
Herkless, Jurisprudence, ch. 10.
Russell, Social Reconstruction, ch. 4.
Spencer, Justice, ch. 12.
Kohler, Philosophy of Law, Albrecht's translation, 120-133.
Maine, Ancient Law, ch. 8.
----, Early History of Institutions (American ed.), 98-118.
----, Early Law and Custom (American ed.), 335-361.
Duguit, in Progress of the Law in the Nineteenth Century (Continental
Legal History Series, Vol. XI), 129-146.
Wagner, Volkswirthschaft und Recht, besonders Vermoegensrecht (1894).
Perreau, Cours d'economie politique, II, Sec.Sec. 623-695 (1916).
De la Grasserie, Les principes sociologiques du droit civil, ch. 3.
Cosentini, La reforme de la legislation civile, 371-422 (1913).
Fouillee, La propriete sociale et la democratie (1884).
Landry, L'Utilite sociale de la propriete individuelle (1901).
Meyer, L'Utilite publique et la propriete privee (1893).
Thezard, La propriete individuelle: Etude de philosophie historique du
droit (1872).
Thomas, L'Utilite publique et la propriete privee (1904).
Berolzheimer, System der Rechts- und Wirthschaftsphilosophie, IV, Sec.Sec.
1-13.
Felix, Entwickelungsgeschichte des Eigenthums (1883-1899).
Karner, Die sociale Funktion der Rechtsinstitute, besonders des
Eigenthums (1904).
Conti, La proprieta fondiaria nel passato e nel presente (1905).