The column of platoons is a close column from which line cannot be

formed directly. It has not been found necessary in Germany to provide

an open column permitting prompt deployment toward a flank. The column

of platoons unites the company on the smallest space and facilitates

supervision, but in companies at full war strength it is not well

adapted for executing changes of front and for taking advantage of

cover, on account of the size of the platoons (40 files each). In

platoons at war strength the men look more toward the point upon which

they are to march than upon the enemy, and the deployment of the rear

platoons offers difficulties which occur principally when a deployment

in an oblique direction or one by the whole company becomes necessary.

The column of platoons is formed by the flank platoons placing

themselves in rear of the center platoon. Line is again formed by rear

platoons moving to right and left and abreast of the leading platoon.

The German company column is much more flexible, and the advantage

of a prompt deployment for action, made possible by the fact that

all platoon commanders and the heads of platoons are in the lead and

therefore can see the objective, should not be underestimated. The

company column is formed from line by the center platoon forming column

of squads to the front (or rear), the flank platoons, each in column

of squads, closing on the center platoon, heads of the three columns

on the same line. Company column is formed as follows from column of

platoons: the leading platoon executes squads right (left), column left

(right), the two rear platoons execute squads right (left), and are

led to a position abreast of the leading platoon. Company column from

column of squads is formed by rear platoons moving to the right and

left respectively, and abreast of the leading platoon.

When line is to be formed from company column, the flank platoons

have to incline to the right and left respectively in order to gain

sufficient interval.

Movements in Column.

For marching short distances to a flank, column of twos may be

employed; for longer distances, column of squads (or fours); and the

march direction may be changed by inclining in the proper direction.

* * * * *

Since March 1904, experiments, which deserve to be mentioned here,

have been made in France under the direction of Colonel Fumet, having

for their object the simplification of the drill regulations. In the

experiments a four-rank formation is being considered. In this proposed

scheme the platoon is formed so as to place the four single-rank squads

(_escouades_) in rear of each other at the very close facing distance

of 0.50 m., the leaders of the _escouades_ taking post on the right

flank, a first class private being posted on each flank and in the

center of each _escouade_.

[Illustration: Forming Double Rank from the Four-Rank Formation and the

Reverse Movement.]

[Illustration: Deployment of a Half-Platoon formed in Four Ranks into

Two Half-Platoons formed in Double Rank.]

[Illustration: The Platoon (_section_) in Line.]

[Illustration: Deployment of a Half-Platoon Into Line of Skirmishers.]

[Illustration: The Company.]

The platoon at war strength (50 men) has a front of 8-10 m. and a

depth of 3 m. The movements are very simple. Route column is formed by

simply facing to flank, without first dividing the platoon into squads.

Double rank line may be formed from column of fours, by executing

right and left front into line. The double rank line may be deployed

into half-platoons. Furthermore, a single rank line may be formed by

the men of the rear rank stepping up into the front rank. One drawback

of this scheme is, that, in forming route column, facing distance of

0.80 m. between ranks is to be gradually gained after stepping off.

The deployment of half-platoons into line of skirmishers offers no

difficulties. It is otherwise, however, when the platoon is formed in

four ranks and marching in platoon front, for then line of skirmishers

can be formed only by deploying each rank in turn. The depth of the

column may be decreased by placing platoons (formed in column of twos

or fours) abreast, this expedient affording a suitable route formation

on broad roads. The company is formed by placing the platoons on a

line and abreast of each other at intervals of 2 m. In the battalion,

column of platoons and “mass” are the only formations considered. In

the “mass” formation the companies, each in line, are in rear of each

other.

7. THE BATTALION.

The movements of the battalion have been considerably simplified

in all armies. Battalion drill is, however, necessary, since, as

shown by the advance of the IInd Army on the morning of August 18th,

1870, simultaneous movements of large masses across country will be

unavoidable in future wars on account of the great size of modern

armies.[76]

[76] Additional examples: Advance of the 6th Infantry Division on

Vionville. _Gen. St. W._, I, p. 556. The flank march made by the 3rd

and 4th Bavarian Brigades from La Maladerie toward Schloss Goury (5

km. battle of Loigny). HÖNIG, _Volkskrieg_, IV, p. 22.

Advance of the 33rd Infantry Brigade from Champdoux against Loigny

(_ibid._, IV, p. 80).

Advance of the 22nd Infantry Division from Lumeau on Poupry, 4.5

km. (_ibid._, IV, p. 139).

Advance of the French to the battle on December 1st, 1870 (_ibid._,

III, p. 164).

Normal Formation of the German Battalion.

The four columns of platoons, or the company columns of a battalion,

may be placed, as dictated by space or purpose, abreast of each other

as a =broad column= (_Breitkolonne_), or in rear of each other as a

=deep column= (_Tiefkolonne_). The numerical order of companies is

immaterial.

[Illustration: Deep Column.]

[Illustration: Broad Column.]

[Illustration]

The deep column is employed for assembling troops if the terrain

necessitates a formation on a narrow front. If sufficient distance is

allowed between companies, line may be formed to a flank, but this

increases the depth of the column to such an extent that movements

at attention are impossible. The deep column may be used as a route

formation in addition to the column of squads. During the change from

route formation to that of action, the deep column formation may be

retained so long as the depth of the whole column does not have to be

further reduced. When necessary, the deep column may be replaced by a

formation in which the four companies, each in route column, are placed

abreast of each other.

The broad column finds proper employment, aside from parades, in cases

where the terrain or the contemplated deployment requires more front

than depth. It is also advisable to assemble the widely scattered

troops in a broad column after an action. The broad column does

not lend itself, however, to the execution of changes of front by

battalion; but should such changes of front become necessary, they are

always to be executed by company.

The color is posted between the right and left center companies, in

broad column, and on the right flank of the third company, in deep

column. In action the color remains with the company with which it

happens to be at the moment.[77] Should this company also join the

firing line, the color accompanies it; but under all circumstances one

squad must remain with the color. (Par. 236 German I. D. R.). It has

been contended that this is a disadvantage, as the enemy can direct

his fire on the color and the men in its vicinity. If the colors, upon

which the soldiers have been sworn, are taken into the field, it is

always better to endure the unavoidable losses incidental to carrying

them, and even to expose them to capture, than to send them back to

a safe place under escort.[78] At the Albrechtshaus farm (Wörth)

the colors served as rallying points around which the disordered

skirmishers rapidly assembled.[79]

[77] In Japan the color joins the battalion commander. British

troops leave their colors in their garrisons. In Russia and France

the color is carried only by one battalion of each regiment.

[78] See KUNZ, _Kriegsgeschichtliche Beispiele_, 14, p. 180,

battle of Wörth. A platoon of the Füsilier-Battalion of the 47th

Infantry was sent to the rear with the color, and a squad of the

Füsilier-Battalion of the 46th Infantry finally had six colors

to guard. In the 88th Infantry, out of a total of 48 sections, 9

sections remained in rear as a guard for 2 colors, but finally 6 of

these sections crossed the Sauer.

[79] KUNZ, _Kriegsgeschichtliche Beispiele_, 13, pp. 77, 152.

The figures given on pages 72 and 73 of the German Infantry Drill

Regulations illustrate formations with organizations at peace strength.

The approximate dimensions of broad and deep columns at war strength

are as follows:

[Illustration]

=Russia.= Numerous formations are prescribed. In addition to route

column, columns with half company front and with company front are

prescribed. Reserve columns are mentioned. These, according to the

number of companies on the same line, are called single platoon

column (deep column), two platoon column (double column), or four

platoon column.

=Austria.= _The mass_, in which the companies of the battalion are

on the same line, each company in company column[80] with intervals

of three paces between companies, is employed for assembling the

battalion in a restricted space in a position in readiness when out

of range of hostile fire, or for assembling the battalion under

cover. The _line of columns_, in which the companies, each in column

or some other suitable formation, are formed abreast of each other at

deploying intervals plus three paces, is also used.

[80] In the Austrian company column (_Kompagniekolonne_), the

platoons, each in line, are formed one in rear of the other. This

formation was formerly called company column (_Kompagniekolonne_)

by the Germans also, but at present they designate it by the term

“column of platoons” (_Zugkolonne_). _Translator._

_The line._ In this formation the companies, each in line, are placed

abreast of each other at intervals of three paces.

_The column._ In this formation the companies are placed in rear of

each other, each either in line or in column, with distances of nine

paces between companies. The companies are numbered 1st, 2nd, 3rd,

4th, etc., from head to rear, if in column, and from right to left,

if in line.

=Italy.= The formations are like those of Austria, but the double

column has been retained.

=Japan.= The only formations prescribed are the broad and deep column.

=France.= The companies are formed in column or in _ligne de sections

par quatre_, intervals and distances being 10 paces. Distances and

intervals may be increased when required. The _battalion in line_ in

which the companies are formed in line in numerical order, abreast of

each other at intervals of six paces, is only retained as a parade

formation.

_Line of company columns_ (_ligne de colonnes_). Companies abreast

with intervals of six paces.

_Deep column_ (_colonne de bataillon_). The companies in normal

formation in rear of each other at distances of 10 paces.

_Double column_ (_colonne double_). Intervals and distances 10 paces.

The formation in which the companies are abreast of each other, each

in column of fours at deploying intervals, is employed in marching

across country and also under artillery fire. Only the regiment

carries a color, the battalion a guidon (_fanion_).

[Illustration: =Deep Column=

(_colonne de bataillon_).

The companies in line of platoons in column of fours (_ligne de

sections par quatre_).]

[Illustration: =Double Column=

(_colonne double_).]

[Illustration: =Deep Column=

(_colonne de bataillon_).]

[Illustration: =Line of Company Columns=

(_ligne de colonnes_).]

[Illustration: =Double Column=

(_colonne double_).

The companies in line of platoons in column of fours (_ligne de

sections par quatre_).]

=England.= Columns are formed, in view of the (8) weak companies in

a battalion, with company or half-company front at full or reduced

distances (_quarter column_). In actions with savages echelon

formations and the square are also employed.

=Switzerland.= The company is divided into four platoons. The line is

used as an assembly formation and for purposes of parade. The company

column, corresponding to the German formation of the same name, is

used for movements on the battlefield. In both line and company

column the platoons are posted abreast, at intervals of three paces.

Finally the route column is used. This is formed either by wheeling

by squads, or by platoons executing column right (left). On the

battlefield the platoon may be deployed and formed in several lines.

In the battalion, company columns in line of columns, or route

columns in the battalion column, are posted abreast at intervals of

10 paces. Line and double column are abolished.

Opinions are divided as to the value of the double column. Formerly,

when the double column was still the column of attack from which

deployment for fire action had to be made, a discussion of its merits

was of special importance. While Austria abandoned the double column

formation in 1881 and Germany in 1905, Switzerland replaced it by a

column having a front of two platoons (_Plotonkolonne_), and Russia

readopted it again recently. All other states utilize it as of equal

value with the deep column in making movements beyond range of

artillery fire and as an assembly formation in addition to the deep

column. The change from double column to any company column formation

is easier than a like change from the Swiss “Ploton column” (double

column of platoons), which has the same front, since in the double

column two companies can be deployed at the same time toward both

flanks.

The deep column appears to be better adapted for making movements and

for advancing under cover, and, on account of its narrow front, a force

in this formation is better able to adapt itself to the forms of the

ground in hilly or close country than a body of troops in double column

of twice the width of front.

The Battalion in Route Column.

(Par. 316 German F. S. R.).

The companies are formed in route column and follow each other at

distances of 8 m. Mounted officers, musicians,[81] led horses and

vehicles are to be included in actual depths of columns given and not

in the distances. A permanent extension of distances for the purpose of

restricting checks of the march to a single organization is as little

permissible as the permanent elimination or reduction of distances;

distances may be dispensed with temporarily only. The reduction of the

depth of a column, obtained by eliminating distances between elements

entirely, is so small that the rapidity of deployment gained does not,

by any means, compensate for the increased exertion of the troops.[82]

[81] A trumpeter marches in rear of the battalion for the purpose

of blowing “Give way,” when necessary to open one side of the road.

At this signal all the troops close in toward the flank of the guide.

[82] The depth of a brigade of six battalions on the march is

about 2500 m. By eliminating distances between elements a space of

only 100 m. is gained, while by marching in a front of six files,

approximately 750 m. is gained. The march of the 10th Infantry

Division from Weiszenburg to Preuschdorf, on August 5th, 1870, proved

exceedingly fatiguing. The distances between organizations had been

eliminated pursuant to orders. “Some of the rearmost elements had to

double time uphill to keep up whenever the head of the column went

down hill. Great fatigue and many cases of overexertion were the

result.” _Geschichte des Regiments Nr. 37_, p. 124.

During the march the company commander goes wherever his presence may

be necessary for the proper supervision of his company. Neither are

platoon commanders tied to a fixed place; one officer is, however,

required to march in rear of the company. The company ammunition

wagons follow in rear of their respective companies, or, assembled, in

rear of the battalion. In marches in campaign the field train marches

separately.

The depth of the battalion on the march, without field train, is 400

m., and the depth of the field train is 100 m.

=Austria.= Column of fours. Depth of a battalion on the march,

including combat train, 670 paces (502 m.). The distance between

companies is nine paces (6.7 m.).

=France.= The distance between companies is 10 paces (7.5 m.). The

depth of each rank is reckoned at 1.40 m. on the march (in Germany

1.10 m.), and that of every 100 men at 50 m. Depth of a battalion,

including combat train, on the march is 450 m.

=Russia.= The distance between companies is 10 paces (7.1 m.). The

battalion without combat train has a depth of 350 paces (249 m.). The

combat train follows in rear of the regiment.

A German regiment of four battalions with combat train has a depth of

1,650 m. on the march; a Russian regiment, a depth of 1,725 paces (@

71 cm.)=1,215 m. (elongation on the march not considered).

=Italy.= The distance between companies is 10 paces (7.5 m.). The

battalion has a depth of 422 m. on the march.

8. THE REGIMENT AND THE BRIGADE.

For a discussion of the importance of the regiment and of the brigade

see page 37 _supra_. All movements must be executed in an orderly

manner by regiment and brigade, in any formation, without breaking up

tactical units, and the entity of the whole body must be preserved at

the same time by a skillful use of the terrain. If necessary, a base

battalion may be designated.

When regiments or brigades are assembled, the formation, disposition,

intervals and distances of the tactical units depend upon the terrain

and the intentions of the commander. Frequently the tactical units

(battalions and regiments) are assembled in separate groups.

When considerations of the enemy and the terrain do not dictate

otherwise, the battalions, each, as a rule, in deep column, are

posted in one or more lines, at 30-pace intervals and distances,

rear battalions covering those in front or the gaps between them. An

appropriate formation will frequently be that in which route columns

are placed abreast and on the same line.

In the brigade, when assembled or deployed, the regiments may be placed

abreast of each other, on the same line, or in rear of each other,

_i.e._, in line or in echelon. When the regiments are formed side by

side, two adjacent independent sections are created, each commanded

by a regimental commander; this insures better supervision, better

control, and a more energetic conduct of the action, since the first

line can be reinforced by troops belonging to the same organization.

This formation, moreover, facilitates tactical combinations. It may,

however, be a disadvantage that the first line is not subject to the

orders of a single commander; that it is difficult to employ the

reserve battalions in one body; and that the brigade commander can

influence the action only by withdrawing units from the regiments for

the purpose of forming a reserve.[83] The echelon formation, each

echelon consisting of a regiment, is frequently used in rencontres,

because troops are thrown into action directly from route column.

The regimental commanders then become leaders of echelons, the first

line cannot be reinforced by its own troops, and the organizations of

different regiments finally become mixed. The echelon formation is

proper only when the second line is intended to be used independently

abreast of the first in the course of the action; for example, on a

flank, for the purpose of making or warding off a flank attack.[84]

When part of a larger force, the most suitable combat formation for

troops is usually the one in which the regiments are formed side by

side.

[83] For historical reference as to the importance of the brigade

in action, see essay published in _Jahrbücher für Armee und Marine_

(August and September numbers 1877) entitled: _Die Infanterie Brigade

in ihrer Entwickelung aus der Brigade von 1812_. In regard to the

employment of regiments in line or in echelon, see Memoir by General

von Moltke on the tactical lessons gained in the campaign of 1866.

MOLTKE, _Taktisch-strategische Aufsätze_, p. 99, et seq.

[84] The fight of François’ Brigade at Spicheren. _Gen. St. W._ I,

p. 310, et seq. The formation, side by side, of the six battalions

of the IIIrd Army Corps in the attack on the hill at Forbach

(Spicheren) would have been inappropriate and would have disrupted

all organizations.

The disadvantages of the echelon formation, when taken up from route

column, can be obviated by deploying the second regiment in rear of a

flank of the first. It should be kept intact in that position until the

decisive moment, although the state of the fight may, at the outset,

invite a more rapid extension of front.

9. EXTENDED ORDER.

Combats are begun and carried out in extended order. The defender can

be induced to disclose his dispositions, to occupy his position, and

to open fire, only by the advance upon him of a skirmish line. The

deployment of a thin firing line will frequently suffice to furnish

the commander of the attacking force with a clue to the strength of

the force holding the hostile position. In close country, skirmishers

are pushed forward primarily to guard against surprise the force which

sends them out, but when thrown forward only a few hundred meters in

open country, such skirmishers are unable to furnish protection. The

strength and density of a firing line (by means of which the fight is

sustained) depend upon marksmanship, upon the purpose of the action,

and upon the terrain. The poorer the marksmanship or the weapon, or

the more unfavorable the field of fire, the greater the number of

skirmishers needed (_i.e._, the denser the firing line).[85] If the

enemy is merely to be kept at a distance, less skirmishers (_i.e._,

a thinner firing line furnished with plenty of ammunition) will be

required, than if the action is to be carried to a decisive conclusion.

[85] The Boers with their superior weapons and better marksmanship,

and further because they never cared to become involved in a fight at

close quarters, found thin firing lines sufficient.

Cohesion and order are best maintained, and the least time is lost in

action, if efficient, dense firing lines are led forward as units up to

the moment of opening fire. (Pars. 169, 321, 334 and 413 German I. D.

R.). But on open terrain such dense firing lines would begin to suffer

too great a loss at ranges at which they could not reply to the fire.

Nothing remains then but to cover the available front with a very thin

firing line, followed at irregular distances by thin skirmish lines

which ploy for the purpose of utilizing cover or for opening fire.

Skirmish lines of this description will hardly justify the opponent’s

expenditure of ammunition, as he can only cover broad spaces with

volley fire. On the other hand, these skirmish lines are in themselves

too weak to facilitate the approach of the following echelons by their

fire. Besides, it must not be overlooked that the soldier, separated by

a considerable interval from his comrades in line during the advance,

and withdrawn from the influence of his officers, succumbs more easily

to temporary spells of weakness and is more apt to remain behind

than the skirmisher in a dense firing line. The advance in several

successive, thin skirmish lines is therefore only an expedient. In each

case the leaders will have to decide whether, in view of the close

proximity of the enemy, a united advance with dense, powerful skirmish

lines is possible or advisable (for instance, when entering at once

upon the decisive stage of the action). Before opening fire the firing

lines must be sufficiently reinforced. (Par. 334 German I. D. R.).

This advance in thin skirmish lines stood the test both in the Boer war

and in the Russo-Japanese war,[86] but we must not forget that thin

skirmish lines are only maneuver formations in an attack that is to be

pushed home, and that the mistake made by the British of attempting to

make an attack with such weak skirmish lines should not be imitated.

The Japanese also used this formation after they had once opened fire

with a dense skirmish line.[87]

[86] Four battalions of the 6th Division advanced at Paardeberg on

February 18th, 1900, on a front of 2000 m. with 800-1000 rifles, in

two lines of equal strength and separated by a distance of 300 m.,

the remainder following at 400 m. Three battalions of the Highland

Brigade even advanced on a front of 4000 m. See my lecture: _Lehren

des Burenkrieges_. _Kriegsgeschichtliche Einzelschriften_, 33, pp. 43

and 67.

Tactics, Volume 1 (of 2). Introduction and Formal Tactics of Infantry · 第 6 / 46 段