THE RELATIVE SENTENCE.

1792. Relative sentences are introduced by relative words, the most

important of which is the pronoun #quī#, _who_, _which_, or _that_. The

relative pronoun may be in any case required by the context, and may

represent any of the three persons.

1793. The relative adverbs, #ubī̆#, #quō#, #unde#, often take the place

of a relative pronoun with a preposition, chiefly in designations of

place, and regularly with town and island names. Less frequently of

persons, though #unde# is not uncommonly thus used.

1794. In a wider sense, sentences introduced by any relative conjunctive

particle, such as #ubī̆#, _when_, are sometimes called relative

sentences. Such sentences, however, are more conveniently treated

separately, under the head of the several conjunctive particles.

1795. (1.) The relative pronoun, like the English relative _who_,

_which_, was developed from the interrogative. Originally, the relative

sentence precedes, and the main sentence follows, just as in question

and answer.

Thus, #quae mūtat, ea corrumpit#, _Fin._ 1, 21, _what he changes, that

he spoils_, is a modification of the older question and answer: #quae

mūtat? ea corrumpit#, _what does he change? that he spoils_. With

adjective relatives, the substantive is expressed in both members, in

old or formal Latin: as, #quae rēs apud nostrōs nōn erant, eārum rērum

nōmina nōn poterant esse ūsitāta#, Cornif. 4, 10, _what things did not

exist among our countrymen, of those things the names could not have

been in common use_.

1796. (2.) The relative sentence may also come last. As early as

Plautus, this had become the prevalent arrangement, and the substantive

of the main sentence is called the _Antecedent_: as,

#ultrā eum locum, quō in locō Germānī cōnsēderant, castrīs idōneum locum

dēlēgit#, 1, 49, 1, _beyond the place in which place the Germans had

established themselves, he selected a suitable spot for his camp_. The

three words #diēs#, #locus#, and #rēs#, are very commonly expressed thus

both in the antecedent and the relative sentence. This repetition is

rare in Livy, and disappears after his time.

1797. In old Latin, rarely in classical poetry, a sentence sometimes

begins with an emphasized antecedent put before the relative, and in the

case of the relative: as, #urbem quam statuō vostra est#, V. 1, 573,

_the city which I found is yours_; for #quam urbem statuō, ea vostra

est#. In the main sentence, #is#, #hīc#, #iste#, or #ille#, is often

used; less frequently, as in this example, an appellative.

1798. The main sentence often has the determinative or demonstrative, or

the substantive, or both omitted: as,

(_a._) #ubī̆ intellēxit diem īnstāre, quō diē frūmentum mīlitibus mētīrī

oportēret#, 1, 16, 5, _when he saw the day was drawing nigh, on which

day the grain was to be measured out to his men_. (_b._) #quōs āmīsimus

cīvīs, eōs Mārtis vīs perculit#, _Marc._ 17, _what fellow-citizens we

have lost, those the fury of the War-god smote down_. (_c._) #Sabīnus

quōs tribūnōs mīlitum circum sē habēbat, sē sequī iubet#, 5, 37, 1,

_Sabinus ordered what tribunes of the soldiers he had about him, to

follow him_.

1799. The antecedent is often omitted when it is indefinite, or is

obvious from the context: as,

#sunt quī mīrentur#, _V_. 1, 6, _there be who wonder_. #dēlēgistī quōs

Rōmae relinquerēs#, _C._ 1, 9, _you picked out people to leave in Rome_.

#quod periīt, periīt#, Pl. _Cist._ 703, _gone is gone_. #Caesar cōgnōvit

Cōnsidium, quod nōn vīdisset, prō vīsō sibī̆ renūntiāvisse#, 1, 22, 4,

_Caesar ascertained that Considius had reported to him as seen what he

had not seen_.

1800. An ablative or nominative abstract in the relative sentence

sometimes represents an ablative of manner or quality omitted from the

main sentence: as, #quā prūdentiā es, nihil tē fugiet#, _Fam._ 11, 13,

1, _with what sense you have, nothing will elude you_, i.e. #eā quā es

prūdentiā, nihil tē fugiet. spērō, quae tua prūdentia est, tē valēre#,

_Att._ 6, 9, 1, _I hope that, with your characteristic caution, you are

well_. #at Āiāx, quō animō trāditur, mīlliēs oppetere mortem quam illa

perpetī māluisset#, _Off._ 1, 113, _Ajax, on the contrary, with his

traditional vehemence, would have chosen rather to die a thousand deaths

than to submit to such indignities_. This ellipsis begins with Cicero,

and is found a few times only in later writers.

A Latin Grammar for Schools and Colleges · 第 468 / 808 题