In a subsequent message, February 22, 1791, the President said:--

“I will proceed to take measures for the ransom of our citizens

in captivity at Algiers, in conformity with your resolution of

advice of the first instant, so soon as the moneys necessary

shall be appropriated by the Legislature, and shall be in

readiness.”[252]

The same subject was presented again to the Senate by President

Washington, in the following inquiry, May 8, 1792.

“If the President of the United States should conclude a

convention or treaty with the Government of Algiers for the

ransom of the thirteen Americans in captivity there, for a sum

not exceeding forty thousand dollars, all expenses included,

will the Senate approve the same? Or is there any, and what,

greater or lesser sum which they would fix on as the limit

beyond which they would not approve the ransom?”[253]

The Senate promptly replied by a resolution declaring it would approve

such treaty of ransom.[254] And Congress, by Act of May 8, 1792,

appropriated a sum of fifty thousand dollars for this purpose.[255]

Commodore Paul Jones was intrusted with the mission to Algiers, charged

with the double duty of making peace and of securing the redemption

of our citizens. In his letter of instructions, June 1, 1792, Mr.

Jefferson considers the rate of ransom.

“It has been a fixed principle with Congress to establish the

rate of ransom of American captives with the Barbary States at

as low a point as possible, that it may not be the interest of

those States to go in quest of our citizens in preference to

those of other countries. Had it not been for the danger it

would have brought on the residue of our seamen, by exciting

the cupidity of these rovers against them, our citizens now in

Algiers would have been long ago redeemed, without regard to

price. The mere money for this particular redemption neither

has been nor is an object with anybody here.”[256]

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 08 (of 20) · 第 95 / 125 题