Among the distinguished persons to whom she had been introduced, none

appears to have stood higher in her regard than Mrs. Delany. This lady

was an interesting and venerable relic of a past age. She was the niece

of George Granville, Lord Lansdowne, who, in his youth, exchanged verses

and compliments with Edmund Waller, and who was among the first to

applaud the opening genius of Pope. She had married Dr. Delany, a man

known to his contemporaries as a profound scholar and an eloquent

preacher, but remembered in our time chiefly as one of that small circle

in which the fierce spirit of Swift, tortured by disappointed ambition,

by remorse, and by the approaches of madness, sought for amusement and

repose. Dr. Delany had long been dead. His widow, nobly descended,

eminently accomplished, and retaining, in spite of the infirmities of

advanced age, the vigor of her faculties and the serenity of her temper,

enjoyed and deserved the favor of the royal family. She had a pension of

three hundred a year; and a house at Windsor, belonging to the Crown,

had been fitted up for her accommodation. At this house the King and

Queen sometimes called, and found a very natural pleasure in thus

catching an occasional glimpse of the private life of English families.

In December, 1785, Miss Burney was on a visit to Mrs. Delany at Windsor.

The dinner was over. The old lady was taking a nap. Her grandniece, a

little girl of seven, was playing at some Christmas game with the

visitors, when the door opened, and a stout gentleman entered

unannounced, with a star on his breast, and "What? what? what?" in his

mouth. A cry of "The King!" was set up. A general scampering followed.

Miss Burney owns that she could not have been more terrified if she had

seen a ghost. But Mrs. Delany came forward to pay her duty to her royal

friend, and the disturbance was quieted. Frances was then presented, and

underwent a long examination and cross-examination about all that she

had written and all that she meant to write. The Queen soon made her

appearance, and his Majesty repeated, for the benefit of his consort,

the information which he had extracted from Miss Burney. The good nature

of the royal pair might have softened even the authors of the

Probationary Odes, and could not but be delightful to a young lady who

had been brought up a Tory. In a few days the visit was repeated. Miss

Burney was more at ease than before. His Majesty, instead of seeking for

information, condescended to impart it, and passed sentence on many

great writers, English and foreign. Voltaire he pronounced a monster.

Rousseau he liked rather better. "But was there ever," he cried, "such

stuff as great part of Shakespeare? Only one must not say so. But what

think you? What? Is there not sad stuff? What? What?"

The next day Frances enjoyed the privilege of listening to some equally

valuable criticism uttered by the Queen touching Goethe and Klopstock,

and might have learned an important lesson of economy from the mode in

which her Majesty's library had been formed. "I picked the book up on a

stall," said the Queen. "Oh, it is amazing what good books there are on

stalls!" Mrs. Delany, who seems to have understood from these words that

her Majesty was in the habit of exploring the booths of Moorfields and

Holywell Street in person, could not suppress an exclamation of

surprise. "Why," said the Queen, "I don't pick them up myself. But I

have a servant very clever; and, if they are not to be had at the

booksellers', they are not for me more than for another." Miss Burney

describes this conversation as delightful; and, indeed, we cannot wonder

that, with her literary tastes, she should be delighted at hearing in

how magnificent a manner the greatest lady in the land encouraged

literature.

The truth is, that Frances was fascinated by the condescending kindness

of the two great personages to whom she had been presented. Her father

was even more infatuated than herself. The result was a step of which we

cannot think with patience, but which, recorded as it is, with all its

consequences, in these volumes, deserves at least this praise, that it

has furnished a most impressive warning.

A German lady of the name of Haggerdorn, one of the keepers of the

Queen's robes, retired about this time; and her Majesty offered the

vacant post to Miss Burney. When we consider that Miss Burney was

decidedly the most popular writer of fictitious narrative then living,

that competence, if not opulence, was within her reach, and that she was

more than usually happy in her domestic circle, and when we compare the

sacrifice which she was invited to make with the remuneration which was

held out to her, we are divided between laughter and indignation.

What was demanded of her was that she should consent to be almost as

completely separated from her family and friends as if she had gone to

Calcutta, and almost as close a prisoner as if she had been sent to jail

for a libel; that with talents which had instructed and delighted the

highest living minds, she should now be employed only in mixing snuff

and sticking pins; that she should be summoned by a waiting woman's bell

to a waiting woman's duties; that she should pass her whole life under

the restraints of a paltry etiquette, should sometimes fast till she was

ready to swoon with hunger, should sometimes stand till her knees gave

way with fatigue; that she should not dare to speak or move without

considering how her mistress might like her words and gestures. Instead

of those distinguished men and women, the flower of all political

parties, with whom she had been in the habit of mixing on terms of equal

friendship, she was to have for her perpetual companion the chief keeper

of the robes, an old hag from Germany, of mean understanding, of

insolent manners, and of temper which, naturally savage, had now been

exasperated by disease. Now and then, indeed, poor Frances might console

herself for the loss of Burke's and Windham's society, by joining in the

"celestial colloquy sublime" of his Majesty's Equerries.

And what was the consideration for which she was to sell herself to this

slavery? A peerage in her own right? A pension of two thousand a year

for life? A seventy-four for her brother in the navy? A deanery for her

brother in the church? Not so. The price at which she was valued was her

board, her lodging, the attendance of a manservant, and two hundred

pounds a year.

The man who, even when hard pressed by hunger, sells his birthright for

a mess of pottage, is unwise. But what shall we say of him who parts

with his birthright, and does not get even the pottage in return? It is

not necessary to inquire whether opulence be an adequate compensation

for the sacrifice of bodily and mental freedom; for Frances Burney paid

for leave to be a prisoner and a menial. It was evidently understood as

one of the terms of her engagement that, while she was a member of the

royal household, she was not to appear before the public as an author;

and even had there been no such understanding, her avocations were such

as left her no leisure for any considerable intellectual effort. That

her place was incompatible with her literary pursuits was indeed frankly

acknowledged by the King when she resigned. "She has given up," he said,

"five years of her pen." That during those five years she might, without

painful exertion, without any exertion that would not have been a

pleasure, have earned enough to buy an annuity for life much larger than

the precarious salary which she received at court, is quite certain. The

same income, too, which in St. Martin's Street would have afforded her

every comfort, must have been found scanty at St. James's. We cannot

venture to speak confidently of the price of millinery and jewelry; but

we are greatly deceived if a lady, who had to attend Queen Charlotte on

many public occasions, could possibly save a farthing out of a salary of

two hundred a year. The principle of the arrangement was, in short,

simply this, that Frances Burney should become a slave, and should be

rewarded by being made a beggar.

With what object their Majesties brought her to their palace, we must

own ourselves unable to conceive. Their object could not be to encourage

her literary exertions; for they took her from a situation in which it

was almost certain that she would write, and put her into a situation in

which it was impossible for her to write. Their object could not be to

promote her pecuniary interest; for they took her from a situation where

she was likely to become rich, and put her into a situation in which she

could not but continue poor. Their object could not be to obtain an

eminently useful waiting maid; for it is clear that, though Miss Burney

was the only woman of her time who could have described the death of

Harrel, thousands might have been found more expert in tying ribbons and

filling snuff-boxes. To grant her a pension on the civil list would have

been an act of judicious liberality, honorable to the court. If this was

impracticable, the next best thing was to let her alone. That the King

and Queen meant her nothing but kindness, we do not in the least doubt.

But their kindness was the kindness of persons raised high above the

mass of mankind, accustomed to be addressed with profound deference,

accustomed to see all who approach them mortified by their coldness and

elated by their smiles. They fancied that to be noticed by them, to be

near them, to serve them, was in itself a kind of happiness; and that

Frances Burney ought to be full of gratitude for being permitted to

purchase, by the surrender of health, wealth, freedom, domestic

affection, and literary fame, the privilege of standing behind a royal

chair, and holding a pair of royal gloves.

And who can blame them? Who can wonder that princes should be under such

a delusion, when they are encouraged in it by the very persons who

suffer from it most cruelly? Was it to be expected that George the Third

and Queen Charlotte should understand the interest of Frances Burney

better, or promote it with more zeal, than herself and her father? No

deception was practised. The conditions of the house of bondage were set

forth with all simplicity. The hook was presented without a bait; the

net was spread in sight of the bird; and the naked hook was greedily

swallowed; and the silly bird made haste to entangle herself in the net.

It is not strange indeed that an invitation to court should have caused

a fluttering in the bosom of an inexperienced young woman. But it was

the duty of the parent to watch over the child, and to show her that on

one side were only infantine vanities and chimerical hopes, on the other

liberty, peace of mind, affluence, social enjoyments, honorable

distinctions. Strange to say, the only hesitation was on the part of

Frances. Dr. Burney was transported out of himself with delight. Not

such are the raptures of a Circassian father who has sold his pretty

daughter well to a Turkish slave-merchant. Yet Dr. Burney was an amiable

man, a man of good abilities, a man who had seen much of the world. But

he seems to have thought that going to court was like going to heaven;

that to see princes and princesses was a kind of beatific vision; that

the exquisite felicity enjoyed by royal persons was not confined to

themselves, but was communicated by some mysterious efflux or reflection

to all who were suffered to stand at their toilettes, or to bear their

trains. He overruled all his daughter's objections, and himself escorted

her to her prison. The door closed. The key was turned. She, looking

back with tender regret on all that she had left, and forward with

anxiety and terror to the new life on which she was entering, was unable

to speak or stand; and he went on his way homeward rejoicing in her

marvellous prosperity.

And now began a slavery of five years, of five years taken from the best

part of life, and wasted in menial drudgery or in recreations duller

than even menial drudgery, under galling restraints and amidst

unfriendly or uninteresting companions. The history of an ordinary day

was this. Miss Burney had to rise and dress herself early, that she

might be ready to answer the royal bell, which rang at half after seven.

Till about eight she attended in the Queen's dressing-room, and had the

honor of lacing her august mistress's stays, and of putting on the hoop,

gown, and neck-handkerchief. The morning was chiefly spent in rummaging

drawers and laying fine clothes in their proper places. Then the Queen

was to be powdered and dressed for the day. Twice a week her Majesty's

hair was curled and craped; and this operation appears to have added a

full hour to the business of the toilette. It was generally three before

Miss Burney was at liberty. Then she had two hours at her own disposal.

To these hours we owe great part of her Diary. At five she had to attend

her colleague, Madame Schwellenberg, a hateful old toadeater, as

illiterate as a chambermaid, as proud as a whole German Chapter, rude,

peevish, unable to bear solitude, unable to conduct herself with common

decency in society. With this delightful associate, Frances Burney had

to dine, and pass the evening. The pair generally remained together from

five to eleven, and often had no other company the whole time, except

during the hour from eight to nine, when the equerries came to tea. If

poor Frances attempted to escape to her own apartment, and to forget her

wretchedness over a book, the execrable old woman railed and stormed,

and complained that she was neglected. Yet, when Frances stayed, she was

constantly assailed with insolent reproaches. Literary fame was, in the

eyes of the German crone, a blemish, a proof that the person who enjoyed

it was meanly born, and out of the pale of good society. All her scanty

stock of broken English was employed to express the contempt with which

she regarded the author of Evelina and Cecilia. Frances detested cards,

and indeed knew nothing about them; but she soon found that the least

miserable way of passing an evening with Madame Schwellenberg was at the

card-table, and consented, with patient sadness, to give hours, which

might have called forth the laughter and the tears of many generations,

to the king of clubs and the knave of spades. Between eleven and twelve

the bell rang again. Miss Burney had to pass twenty minutes or half an

hour in undressing the Queen, and was then at liberty to retire and to

dream that she was chatting with her brother by the quiet hearth in St.

Martin's Street, that she was the centre of an admiring assemblage at

Mrs. Crewe's, that Burke was calling her the first woman of the age, or

that Dilly was giving her a cheque for two thousand guineas.

Men, we must suppose, are less patient than women; for we are utterly at

a loss to conceive how any human being could endure such a life, while

there remained a vacant garret in Grub Street, a crossing in want of a

sweeper, a parish workhouse, or a parish vault. And it was for such a

life that Frances Burney had given up liberty and peace, a happy

fireside, attached friends, a wide and splendid circle of acquaintance,

intellectual pursuits in which she was qualified to excel, and the sure

hope of what to her would have been affluence.

There is nothing new under the sun. The last great master of Attic

eloquence and Attic wit has left us a forcible and touching description

of the misery of a man of letters, who, lured by hopes similar to those

of Frances, had entered the service of one of the magnates of Rome.

"Unhappy that I am," cries the victim of his own childish ambition;

"would nothing content me but that I must leave mine old pursuits and

mine old companions, and the life which was without care, and the sleep

which had no limit save mine own pleasure, and the walks which I was

free to take where I listed, and fling myself into the lowest pit of a

dungeon like this? And, O God! for what? Was there no way by which I

might have enjoyed in freedom comforts even greater than those which I

now earn by servitude? Like a lion which has been made so tame that men

may lead him about by a thread, I am dragged up and down, with broken

and humbled spirit, at the heels of those to whom, in mine own domain, I

should have been an object of awe and wonder. And, worst of all, I feel

that here I gain no credit, that here I give no pleasure. The talents

and accomplishments which charmed a far different circle are here out of

place. I am rude in the arts of palaces, and can ill bear comparison

with those whose calling, from their youth up, has been to flatter and

to sue. Have I, then, two lives, that, after I have wasted one in the

service of others, there may yet remain to me a second, which I may live

unto myself?"

Now and then, indeed, events occurred which disturbed the wretched

monotony of Frances Burney's life. The Court moved from Kew to Windsor,

and from Windsor back to Kew. One dull colonel went out of waiting, and

another dull colonel came into waiting. An impertinent servant made a

blunder about tea, and caused a misunderstanding between the gentlemen

and the ladies. A half-witted French Protestant minister talked oddly

about conjugal fidelity. An unlucky member of the household mentioned a

passage in the Morning Herald reflecting on the Queen; and forthwith

Madame Schwellenberg began to storm in bad English, and told him that he

made her "what you call perspire!"

A more important occurrence was the King's visit to Oxford. Miss Burney

went in the royal train to Nuneham, was utterly neglected there in the

crowd, and could with difficulty find a servant to show the way to her

bedroom, or a hairdresser to arrange her curls. She had the honor of

entering Oxford in the last of a long string of carriages which formed

the royal procession, of walking after the Queen all day through

refectories and chapels, and of standing, half dead with fatigue and

hunger, while her august mistress was seated at an excellent cold

collation. At Magdalene College, Frances was left for a moment in a

parlor, where she sank down on a chair. A good-natured equerry saw that

she was exhausted, and shared with her some apricots and bread, which he

had wisely put into his pockets. At that moment the door opened; the

Queen entered; the wearied attendants sprang up; the bread and fruit

were hastily concealed. "I found," says poor Miss Burney, "that our

appetites were to be supposed annihilated, at the same moment that our

strength was to be invincible."

Yet Oxford, seen even under such disadvantages, "revived in her," to use

her own words, "a consciousness to pleasure which had long lain nearly

dormant." She forgot, during one moment, that she was a waiting maid,

and felt as a woman of true genius might be expected to feel amidst

venerable remains of antiquity, beautiful works of art, vast

repositories of knowledge, and memorials of the illustrious dead. Had

she still been what she was before her father induced her to take the

most fatal step of her life, we can easily imagine what pleasure she

would have derived from a visit to the noblest of English cities. She

might, indeed, have been forced to travel in a hack chaise, and might

not have worn so fine a gown of Chambery gauze as that in which she

tottered after the royal party; but with what delight would she have

then paced the cloisters of Magdalene, compared the antique gloom of

Merton with the splendor of Christ Church, and looked down from the dome

of the Radcliffe Library on the magnificent sea of turrets and

battlements below! How gladly would learned men have laid aside for a

few hours Pindar's Odes and Aristotle's Ethics, to escort the author of

Cecilia from college to college! What neat little banquets would she

have found set out in their monastic cells! With what eagerness would

pictures, medals, and illuminated missals have been brought forth from

the most mysterious cabinets for her amusement! How much she would have

had to hear and to tell about Johnson, as she walked over Pembroke, and

about Reynolds, in the antechapel of New College! But these indulgences

were not for one who had sold herself into bondage.

About eighteen months after the visit to Oxford, another event

diversified the wearisome life which Frances led at court. Warren

Hastings was brought to the bar of the House of Peers. The Queen and

Princesses were present when the trial commenced, and Miss Burney was

permitted to attend. During the subsequent proceedings a day rule for

the same purpose was occasionally granted to her; for the Queen took the

strongest interest in the trial, and when she could not go herself to

Westminster Hall, liked to receive a report of what had passed from a

person who had singular powers of observation, and who was, moreover,

acquainted with some of the most distinguished managers. The portion of

the Diary which relates to this celebrated proceeding is lively and

picturesque. Yet we read it, we own, with pain; for it seems to us to

prove that the fine understanding of Frances Burney was beginning to

feel the pernicious influence of a mode of life which is as incompatible

with health of mind as the air of the Pontine marshes with health of

body. From the first day she espouses the cause of Hastings with a

presumptuous vehemence and acrimony quite inconsistent with the modesty

and suavity of her ordinary deportment. She shudders when Burke enters

the hall at the head of the Commons. She pronounces him the cruel

oppressor of an innocent man. She is at a loss to conceive how the

managers can look at the defendant, and not blush. Windham comes to her

from the managers' box, to offer her refreshment. "But," says she, "I

could not break bread with him." Then, again, she exclaims, "Ah, Mr.

Windham, how came you ever engaged in so cruel, so unjust a cause?" "Mr.

Burke saw me," she says, "and he bowed with the most marked civility of

manner." This, be it observed, was just after his opening speech,--a

speech which had produced a mighty effect, and which, certainly, no

other orator that ever lived could have made. "My curtsy," she

continues, "was the most ungrateful, distant, and cold; I could not do

otherwise; so hurt I felt to see him the head of such a cause." Now, not

only had Burke treated her with constant kindness, but the very last act

which he performed on the day on which he was turned out of the Pay

Office, about four years before this trial, was to make Dr. Burney

organist of Chelsea Hospital. When, at the Westminster election, Dr.

Burney was divided between his gratitude for this favor and his Tory

opinions, Burke in the noblest manner disclaimed all right to exact a

sacrifice of principle. "You have little or no obligations to me," he

wrote; "but if you had as many as I really wish it were in my power, as

it is certainly in my desire, to lay on you, I hope you do not think me

capable of conferring them, in order to subject your mind or your

affairs to a painful and mischievous servitude." Was this a man to be

uncivilly treated by a daughter of Dr. Burney, because she chose to

differ from him respecting a vast and most complicated question, which

he had studied deeply during many years, and which she had never studied

at all? It is clear, from Miss Burney's own narrative, that, when she

behaved so unkindly to Mr. Burke, she did not even know of what Hastings

was accused. One thing, however, she must have known, that Burke had

been able to convince a House of Commons, bitterly prejudiced against

himself, that the charges were well founded, and that Pitt and Dundas

had concurred with Fox and Sheridan in supporting the impeachment.

Surely a woman of far inferior abilities to Miss Burney might have been

expected to see that this never could have happened unless there had

been a strong case against the late Governor General. And there was, as

all reasonable men now admit, a strong case against him. That there were

great public services to be set off against his great crimes is

perfectly true. But his services and his crimes were equally unknown to

the lady who so confidently asserted his perfect innocence and imputed

to his accusers, that is to say, to all the greatest men of all parties

in the state, not merely error, but gross injustice and barbarity.

She had, it is true, occasionally seen Mr. Hastings, and had found his

manners and conversation agreeable. But surely she could not be so weak

as to infer from the gentleness of his deportment in a drawing-room,

that he was incapable of committing a great state crime, under the

influence of ambition and revenge. A silly Miss, fresh from a boarding

school, might fall into such a mistake; but the woman who had drawn the

character of Mr. Monckton should have known better.

Critical and Historical Essays, Volume III (of 3) · 第 29 / 60 段