The ambition of the poet was still unsubdued. When the London season

closed, he applied himself vigorously to the work of removing blemishes.

He does not seem to have suspected, what we are strongly inclined to

suspect, that the whole piece was one blemish, and that the passages

which were meant to be fine were, in truth, bursts of that tame

extravagance into which writers fall when they set themselves to be

sublime and pathetic in spite of nature. He omitted, added, retouched,

and flattered himself with hopes of a complete success in the following

year; but in the following year, Garrick showed no disposition to bring

the amended tragedy on the stage. Solicitation and remonstrance were

tried in vain. Lady Coventry, drooping under that malady which seems

ever to select what is loveliest for its prey, could render no

assistance. The manager's language was civilly evasive; but his

resolution was inflexible.

Crisp had committed a great error; but he had escaped with a very slight

penance. His play had not been hooted from the boards. It had, on the

contrary, been better received than many very estimable performances

have been,--than Johnson's Irene, for example, or Goldsmith's

Good-Natured Man. Had Crisp been wise, he would have thought himself

happy in having purchased self-knowledge so cheap. He would have

relinquished, without vain repinings, the hope of poetical distinction,

and would have turned to the many sources of happiness which he still

possessed. Had he been, on the other hand, an unfeeling and unblushing

dunce, he would have gone on writing scores of bad tragedies in defiance

of censure and derision. But he had too much sense to risk a second

defeat, yet too little sense to bear his first defeat like a man. The

fatal delusion that he was a great dramatist had taken firm possession

of his mind. His failure he attributed to every cause except the true

one. He complained of the ill will of Garrick, who appears to have done

for the play everything that ability and zeal could do, and who, from

selfish motives, would, of course, have been well pleased if Virginia

had been as successful as the Beggar's Opera. Nay, Crisp complained of

the languor of the friends whose partiality had given him three benefit

nights to which he had no claim. He complained of the injustice of the

spectators, when, in truth, he ought to have been grateful for their

unexampled patience. He lost his temper and spirits, and became a cynic

and a hater of mankind. From London he retired to Hampton, and from

Hampton to a solitary and long-deserted mansion, built on a common in

one of the wildest tracts of Surrey. No road, not even a sheep walk,

connected his lonely dwelling with the abodes of men. The place of his

retreat was strictly concealed from his old associates. In the spring he

sometimes emerged, and was seen at exhibitions and concerts in London.

But he soon disappeared, and hid himself, with no society but his books,

in his dreary hermitage. He survived his failure about thirty years. A

new generation sprang up around him. No memory of his bad verses

remained among men. His very name was forgotten. How completely the

world had lost sight of him will appear from a single circumstance. We

looked for him in a copious Dictionary of Dramatic Authors published

while he was still alive, and we found only that Mr. Henry Crisp, of the

Custom House, had written a play called Virginia, acted in 1754. To the

last, however, the unhappy man continued to brood over the injustice of

the manager and the pit, and tried to convince himself and others that

he had missed the highest literary honors, only because he had omitted

some fine passages in compliance with Garrick's judgment. Alas, for

human nature, that the wounds of vanity should smart and bleed so much

longer than the wounds of affection! Few people, we believe, whose

nearest friends and relations died in 1754, had any acute feeling of the

loss in 1782. Dear sisters, and favorite daughters, and brides snatched

away before the honeymoon was passed, had been forgotten, or were

remembered only with a tranquil regret. But Samuel Crisp was still

mourning for his tragedy, like Rachel weeping for her children, and

would not be comforted. "Never," such was his language twenty-eight

years after his disaster, "never give up or alter a tittle unless it

perfectly coincides with your own inward feelings. I can say this to my

sorrow and my cost. But mum!" Soon after these words were written, his

life--a life which might have been eminently useful and happy--ended in

the same gloom in which, during more than a quarter of a century, it had

been passed. We have thought it worth while to rescue from oblivion this

curious fragment of literary history. It seems to us at once ludicrous,

melancholy, and full of instruction.

Crisp was an old and very intimate friend of the Burneys. To them alone

was confided the name of the desolate old hall in which he hid himself

like a wild beast in a den. For them were reserved such remains of his

humanity as had survived the failure of his play. Frances Burney he

regarded as his daughter. He called her his Fannikin; and she in return

called him her dear Daddy. In truth, he seems to have done much more

than her real parents for the development of her intellect; for though

he was a bad poet, he was a scholar, a thinker, and an excellent

counsellor. He was particularly fond of the concerts in Poland Street.

They had, indeed, been commenced at his suggestion, and when he visited

London he constantly attended them. But when he grew old, and when gout,

brought on partly by mental irritation, confined him to his retreat, he

was desirous of having a glimpse of that gay and brilliant world from

which he was exiled, and he pressed Fannikin to send him full accounts

of her father's evening parties. A few of her letters to him have been

published; and it is impossible to read them without discerning in them

all the powers which afterwards produced Evelina and Cecilia, the

quickness in catching every odd peculiarity of character and manner, the

skill in grouping, the humor, often richly comic, sometimes even

farcical.

Fanny's propensity to novel-writing had for a time been kept down. It

now rose up stronger than ever. The heroes and heroines of the tales

which had perished in the flames were still present to the eye of her

mind. One favorite story, in particular, haunted her imagination. It was

about a certain Caroline Evelyn, a beautiful damsel who made an

unfortunate love match, and died, leaving an infant daughter. Frances

began to image to herself the various scenes, tragic and comic, through

which the poor motherless girl, highly connected on one side, meanly

connected on the other, might have to pass. A crowd of unreal beings,

good and bad, grave and ludicrous, surrounded the pretty, timid, young

orphan; a coarse sea captain, an ugly insolent fop, blazing in a superb

court dress; another fop, as ugly and as insolent, but lodged on Snow

Hill, and tricked out in second-hand finery for the Hampstead ball; an

old woman, all wrinkles and rouge, flirting her fan with the air of a

miss of seventeen, and screaming in a dialect made up of vulgar French

and vulgar English; a poet lean and ragged, with a broad Scotch accent.

By degrees these shadows acquired stronger and stronger consistence; the

impulse which urged Frances to write became irresistible; and the result

was the history of Evelina.

Then came, naturally enough, a wish, mingled with many fears, to appear

before the public; for, timid as Frances was, and bashful, and

altogether unaccustomed to hear her own praises, it is clear that she

wanted neither a strong passion for distinction, nor a just confidence

in her own powers. Her scheme was to become, if possible, a candidate

for fame without running any risk of disgrace. She had not money to bear

the expense of printing. It was therefore necessary that some bookseller

should be induced to take the risk; and such a bookseller was not

readily found. Dodsley refused even to look at the manuscript unless he

were entrusted with the name of the author. A publisher in Fleet Street,

named Lowndes, was more complaisant. Some correspondence took place

between this person and Miss Burney, who took the name of Grafton, and

desired that the letters addressed to her might be left at the Orange

Coffee-House. But, before the bargain was finally struck, Fanny thought

it her duty to obtain her father's consent. She told him that she had

written a book, that she wished to have his permission to publish it

anonymously, but that she hoped that he would not insist upon seeing it.

What followed may serve to illustrate what we meant when we said that

Mr. Burney was as bad a father as so good-hearted a man could possibly

be. It never seems to have crossed his mind that Fanny was about to take

a step on which the whole happiness of her life might depend, a step

which might raise her to an honorable eminence, or cover her with

ridicule and contempt. Several people had already been trusted, and

strict concealment was therefore not to be expected. On so grave an

occasion, it was surely his duty to give his best counsel to his

daughter, to win her confidence, to prevent her from exposing herself if

her book were a bad one, and, if it were a good one, to see that the

terms which she made with the publisher were likely to be beneficial to

her. Instead of this, he only stared, burst out a-laughing, kissed her,

gave her leave to do as she liked, and never even asked the name of her

work. The contract with Lowndes was speedily concluded. Twenty pounds

were given for the copyright, and were accepted by Fanny with delight.

Her father's inexcusable neglect of his duty happily caused her no

worse evil than the loss of twelve or fifteen hundred pounds.

After many delays Evelina appeared in January, 1778. Poor Fanny was sick

with terror, and durst hardly stir out of doors. Some days passed before

anything was heard of the book. It had, indeed, nothing but its own

merits to push it into public favor. Its author was unknown. The house

by which it was published was not, we believe, held in high estimation.

No body of partisans had been engaged to applaud. The better class of

readers expected little from a novel about a young lady's entrance into

the world. There was, indeed, at that time a disposition among the most

respectable people to condemn novels generally; nor was this disposition

by any means without excuse; for works of that sort were then almost

always silly, and very frequently wicked.

Soon, however, the first faint accents of praise began to be heard. The

keepers of the circulating libraries reported that everybody was asking

for Evelina, and that some person had guessed Anstey to be the author.

Then came a favorable notice in the London Review; then another still

more favorable in the Monthly. And now the book found its way to tables

which had seldom been polluted by marble-covered volumes. Scholars and

statesmen, who contemptuously abandoned the crowd of romances to Miss

Lydia Languish and Miss Sukey Saunter, were not ashamed to own that they

could not tear themselves away from Evelina. Fine carriages and rich

liveries, not often seen east of Temple Bar, were attracted to the

publisher's shop in Fleet Street. Lowndes was daily questioned about the

author, but was himself as much in the dark as any of the questioners.

The mystery, however, could not remain a mystery long. It was known to

brothers and sisters, aunts and cousins; and they were far too proud and

too happy to be discreet. Dr. Burney wept over the book in rapture.

Daddy Crisp shook his fist at his Fannikin in affectionate anger at not

having been admitted to her confidence. The truth was whispered to Mrs.

Thrale; and then it began to spread fast.

The book had been admired while it was ascribed to men of letters long

conversant with the world, and accustomed to composition. But when it

was known that a reserved, silent young woman had produced the best work

of fiction that had appeared since the death of Smollett, the

acclamations were redoubled. What she had done was, indeed,

extraordinary. But, as usual, various reports improved the story till it

became miraculous. Evelina, it was said, was the work of a girl of

seventeen. Incredible as this tale was, it continued to be repeated down

to our own time. Frances was too honest to confirm it. Probably she was

too much a woman to contradict it; and it was long before any of her

detractors thought of this mode of annoyance. Yet there was no want of

low minds and bad hearts in the generation which witnessed her first

appearance. There was the envious Kenrick and the savage Wolcot, the asp

George Steevens, and the polecat John Williams. It did not, however,

occur to them to search the parish register of Lynn, in order that they

might be able to twit a lady with having concealed her age. That truly

chivalrous exploit was reserved for a bad writer of our own time, whose

spite she had provoked by not furnishing him with materials for a

worthless edition of Boswell's Life of Johnson, some sheets of which our

readers have doubtless seen round parcels of better books.

But we must return to our story. The triumph was complete. The timid and

obscure girl found herself on the highest pinnacle of fame. Great men,

on whom she had gazed at a distance with humble reverence, addressed her

with admiration, tempered by the tenderness due to her sex and age.

Burke, Windham, Gibbon, Reynolds, Sheridan, were among her most ardent

eulogists. Cumberland acknowledged her merit, after his fashion, by

biting his lips and wriggling in his chair whenever her name was

mentioned. But it was at Streatham that she tasted, in the highest

perfection, the sweets of flattery, mingled with the sweets of

friendship. Mrs. Thrale, then at the height of prosperity and

popularity, with gay spirits, quick wit, showy though superficial

acquirements, pleasing though not refined manners, a singularly amiable

temper, and a loving heart, felt towards Fanny as towards a younger

sister. With the Thrales Johnson was domesticated. He was an old friend

of Dr. Burney; but he had probably taken little notice of Dr. Burney's

daughters, and Fanny, we imagine, had never in her life dared to speak

to him, unless to ask whether he wanted a nineteenth or a twentieth cup

of tea. He was charmed by her tale, and preferred it to the novels of

Fielding, to whom, indeed, he had always been grossly unjust. He did

not, indeed, carry his partiality so far as to place Evelina by the side

of Clarissa and Sir Charles Grandison; yet he said that his little

favorite had done enough to have made even Richardson feel uneasy. With

Johnson's cordial approbation of the book was mingled a fondness, half

gallant, half paternal, for the writer; and this fondness his age and

character entitled him to show without restraint. He began by putting

her hand to his lips. But he soon clasped her in his huge arms, and

implored her to be a good girl. She was his pet, his dear love, his dear

little Burney, his little character-monger. At one time, he broke forth

in praise of the good taste of her caps. At another time he insisted on

teaching her Latin. That, with all his coarseness and irritability, he

was a man of sterling benevolence has long been acknowledged. But how

gentle and endearing his deportment could be was not known till the

Recollections of Madame D'Arblay were published.

We have mentioned a few of the most eminent of those who paid their

homage to the author of Evelina. The crowd of inferior admirers would

require a catalogue as long as that in the second book of the Iliad. In

that catalogue would be Mrs. Cholmondeley, the sayer of odd things, and

Seward, much given to yawning, and Baretti, who slew the man in the

Haymarket, and Paoli, talking broken English, and Langton, taller by the

head than any other member of the club, and Lady Millar, who kept a vase

wherein fools were wont to put bad verses, and Jerningham, who wrote

verses fit to be put into the vase of Lady Millar, and Dr. Franklin,

not, as some have dreamed, the great Pennsylvanian Dr. Franklin, who

could not then have paid his respects to Miss Burney without much risk

of being hanged, drawn, and quartered, but Dr. Franklin the less,

[Greek:

Aias

meion, outi tosos ge hosos Telamonios Aias,

alla poly meion.]

It would not have been surprising if such success had turned even a

strong head, and corrupted even a generous and affectionate nature. But,

in the Diary, we can find no trace of any feeling inconsistent with a

truly modest and amiable disposition. There is, indeed, abundant proof

that Frances enjoyed with an intense, though a troubled, joy the honors

which her genius had won; but it is equally clear that her happiness

sprang from the happiness of her father, her sister, and her dear Daddy

Crisp. While flattered by the great, the opulent, and the learned, while

followed along the Steyne at Brighton, and the Pantiles at Tunbridge

Wells, by the gaze of admiring crowds, her heart seems to have been

still with the little domestic circle in St. Martin's Street. If she

recorded with minute diligence all the compliments, delicate and coarse,

which she heard wherever she turned, she recorded them for the eyes of

two or three persons who had loved her from infancy, who had loved her

in obscurity, and to whom her fame gave the purest and most exquisite

delight. Nothing can be more unjust than to confound these outpourings

of a kind heart, sure of perfect sympathy, with the egotism of a

blue-stocking, who prates to all who come near her about her own novel

or her own volume of sonnets.

It was natural that the triumphant issue of Miss Burney's first venture

should tempt her to try a second. Evelina, though it had raised her

fame, had added nothing to her fortune. Some of her friends urged her to

write for the stage. Johnson promised to give her his advice as to the

composition. Murphy, who was supposed to understand the temper of the

pit as well as any man of his time, undertook to instruct her as to

stage effect. Sheridan declared that he would accept a play from her

without even reading it. Thus encouraged, she wrote a comedy named The

Witlings. Fortunately it was never acted or printed. We can, we think,

easily perceive, from the little which is said on the subject in the

Diary, that The Witlings would have been damned, and that Murphy and

Sheridan thought so, though they were too polite to say so. Happily

Frances had a friend who was not afraid to give her pain. Crisp, wiser

for her than he had been for himself, read the manuscript in his lonely

retreat, and manfully told her that she had failed, that to remove

blemishes here and there would be useless, that the piece had abundance

of wit, but no interest, that it was bad as a whole, that it would

remind every reader of the Femmes Savantes, which, strange to say, she

had never read, and that she could not sustain so close a comparison

with Moliere. This opinion, in which Dr. Burney concurred, was sent to

Frances, in what she called "a hissing, groaning, catcalling epistle."

But she had too much sense not to know that it was better to be hissed

and catcalled by her Daddy, than by a whole sea of heads in the pit of

Drury Lane Theatre; and she had too good a heart not to be grateful for

so rare an act of friendship. She returned an answer, which shows how

well she deserved to have a judicious, faithful, and affectionate

adviser. "I intend," she wrote, "to console myself for your censure by

this greatest proof I have ever received of the sincerity, candor, and,

let me add, esteem, of my dear daddy. And as I happen to love myself

more than my play, this consolation is not a very trifling one. This,

however, seriously I do believe, that when my two daddies put their

heads together to concert that hissing, groaning, catcalling epistle

they sent me, they felt as sorry for poor little Miss Bayes as she could

possibly do for herself. You see I do not attempt to repay your

frankness with an air of pretended carelessness. But, though somewhat

disconcerted just now, I will promise not to let my vexation live out

another day. Adieu, my dear daddy, I won't be mortified, and I won't be

_downed_; but I will be proud to find I have, out of my own family, as

well as in it, a friend who loves me well enough to speak plain truth to

me."

Frances now turned from her dramatic schemes to an undertaking far

better suited to her talents. She determined to write a new tale, on a

plan excellently contrived for the display of the powers in which her

superiority to other writers lay. It was in truth a grand and various

picture gallery, which presented to the eye a long series of men and

women, each marked by some strong peculiar feature. There were avarice

and prodigality, the pride of blood and the pride of money, morbid

restlessness and morbid apathy, frivolous garrulity, supercilious

silence, a Democritus to laugh at everything, and a Heraclitus to lament

over everything. The work proceeded fast, and in twelve months was

completed. It wanted something of the simplicity which had been among

the most attractive charms of Evelina; but it furnished ample proof that

the four years which had elapsed since Evelina appeared had not been

unprofitably spent. Those who saw Cecilia in manuscript pronounced it

the best novel of the age. Mrs. Thrale laughed and wept over it. Crisp

was even vehement in applause, and offered to insure the rapid and

complete success of the book for half a crown. What Miss Burney

received for the copyright is not mentioned in the Diary; but we have

observed several expressions from which we infer that the sum was

considerable. That the sale would be great nobody could doubt; and

Frances now had shrewd and experienced advisers, who would not suffer

her to wrong herself. We have been told that the publishers gave her two

thousand pounds, and we have no doubt that they might have given a still

larger sum without being losers.

Cecilia was published in the summer of 1782. The curiosity of the town

was intense. We have been informed by persons who remember those days

that no romance of Sir Walter Scott was more impatiently awaited, or

more eagerly snatched from the counters of the booksellers. High as

public expectation was, it was amply satisfied; and Cecilia was placed,

by general acclamation, among the classical novels of England.

Miss Burney was now thirty. Her youth had been singularly prosperous;

but clouds soon began to gather over that clear and radiant dawn. Events

deeply painful to a heart so kind as that of Frances followed each other

in rapid succession. She was first called upon to attend the deathbed of

her best friend, Samuel Crisp. When she returned to St. Martin's Street,

after performing this melancholy duty, she was appalled by hearing that

Johnson had been struck with paralysis; and, not many months later, she

parted from him for the last time with solemn tenderness. He wished to

look on her once more; and on the day before his death she long remained

in tears on the stairs leading to his bedroom, in the hope that she

might be called in to receive his blessing. He was then sinking fast,

and though he sent her an affectionate message, was unable to see her.

But this was not the worst. There are separations far more cruel than

those which are made by death. She might weep with proud affection for

Crisp and Johnson. She had to blush as well as to weep for Mrs. Thrale.

Life, however, still smiled upon Frances. Domestic happiness,

friendship, independence, leisure, letters, all these things were hers;

and she flung them all away.

Critical and Historical Essays, Volume III (of 3) · 第 28 / 60 段