Though the world saw and heard little of Madame D'Arblay during the last

forty years of her life, and though that little did not add to her fame,

there were thousands, we believe, who felt a singular emotion when they

learned that she was no longer among us. The news of her death carried

the minds of men back at one leap over two generations, to the time when

her first literary triumphs were won. All those whom we had been

accustomed to revere as intellectual patriarchs seemed children when

compared with her; for Burke had sat up all night to read her writings,

and Johnson had pronounced her superior to Fielding, when Rogers was

still a schoolboy, and Southey still in petticoats. Yet more strange did

it seem that we should just have lost one whose name had been widely

celebrated before anybody had heard of some illustrious men who, twenty,

thirty, or forty years ago, were, after a long and splendid career,

borne with honor to the grave. Yet so it was. Frances Burney was at the

height of fame and popularity before Cowper had published his first

volume, before Porson had gone up to college, before Pitt had taken his

seat in the House of Commons, before the voice of Erskine had been once

heard in Westminster Hall. Since the appearance of her first work,

sixty-two years had passed; and this interval had been crowded, not only

with political, but also with intellectual revolutions. Thousands of

reputations had, during that period, sprung up, bloomed, withered, and

disappeared. New kinds of composition had come into fashion, had gone

out of fashion, had been derided, had been forgotten. The fooleries of

Della Crusca, and the fooleries of Kotzebue, had for a time bewitched

the multitude, but had left no trace behind them; nor had misdirected

genius been able to save from decay the once flourishing schools of

Godwin, of Darwin, and of Radcliffe. Many books, written for temporary

effect, had run through six or seven editions, and had then been

gathered to the novels of Afra Behn, and the epic poems of Sir Richard

Blackmore. Yet the early works of Madame D'Arblay, in spite of the lapse

of years, in spite of the change of manners, in spite of the popularity

deservedly obtained by some of her rivals, continued to hold a high

place in the public esteem. She lived to be a classic. Time set on her

fame, before she went hence, that seal which is seldom set except on the

fame of the departed. Like Sir Condy Rackrent in the tale, she survived

her own wake, and overheard the judgment of posterity.

Having always felt a warm and sincere, though not a blind admiration for

her talents, we rejoiced to learn that her Diary was about to be made

public. Our hopes, it is true, were not unmixed with fears. We could not

forget the fate of the Memoirs of Dr. Burney, which were published ten

years ago. That unfortunate book contained much that was curious and

interesting. Yet it was received with a cry of disgust, and was speedily

consigned to oblivion. The truth is, that it deserved its doom. It was

written in Madame D'Arblay's later style, the worst style that has ever

been known among men. No genius, no information, could save from

proscription a book so written. We, therefore, opened the Diary with no

small anxiety, trembling lest we should light upon some of that peculiar

rhetoric which deforms almost every page of the Memoirs, and which it is

impossible to read without a sensation made up of mirth, shame, and

loathing. We soon, however, discovered to our great delight that this

Diary was kept before Madame D'Arblay became eloquent. It is, for the

most part, written in her earliest and best manner, in true woman's

English, clear, natural, and lively. The two works are lying side by

side before us; and we never turn from the Memoirs to the Diary without

a sense of relief. The difference is as great as the difference between

the atmosphere of a perfumer's shop, fetid with lavender water and

jasmine soap, and the air of a heath on a fine morning in May. Both

works ought to be consulted by every person who wishes to be well

acquainted with the history of our literature and our manners. But to

read the Diary is a pleasure; to read the Memoirs will always be a task.

We may, perhaps, afford some harmless amusement to our readers if we

attempt, with the help of these two books, to give them an account of

the most important years of Madame D'Arblay's life.

She was descended from a family which bore the name of Macburney, and

which, though probably of Irish origin, had been long settled in

Shropshire, and was possessed of considerable estates in that county.

Unhappily, many years before her birth, the Macburneys began, as if of

set purpose and in a spirit of determined rivalry, to expose and ruin

themselves. The heir apparent, Mr. James Macburney, offended his father

by making a runaway match with an actress from Goodman's Fields. The old

gentleman could devise no more judicious mode of wreaking vengeance on

his undutiful boy than by marrying the cook. The cook gave birth to a

son named Joseph, who succeeded to all the lands of the family, while

James was cut off with a shilling. The favorite son, however, was so

extravagant that he soon became as poor as his disinherited brother.

Both were forced to earn their bread by their labor. Joseph turned

dancing master, and settled in Norfolk. James struck off the Mac from

the beginning of his name, and set up as a portrait painter at Chester.

Here he had a son named Charles, well known as the author of the History

of Music, and as the father of two remarkable children, of a son

distinguished by learning, and of a daughter still more honorably

distinguished by genius.

Charles early showed a taste for that art, of which, at a later period,

he became the historian. He was apprenticed to a celebrated musician in

London, and applied himself to study with vigor and success. He soon

found a kind and munificent patron in Fulk Greville, a high-born and

high-bred man, who seems to have had in large measure all the

accomplishments and all the follies, all the virtues and all the vices,

which, a hundred years ago, were considered as making up the character

of a fine gentleman. Under such protection, the young artist had every

prospect of a brilliant career in the capital. But his health failed. It

became necessary for him to retreat from the smoke and river fog of

London, to the pure air of the coast. He accepted the place of organist,

at Lynn, and settled at that town with a young lady who had recently

become his wife.

At Lynn, in June, 1752, Frances Burney was born. Nothing in her

childhood indicated that she would, while still a young woman, have

secured for herself an honorable and permanent place among English

writers. She was shy and silent. Her brothers and sisters called her a

dunce, and not without some show of reason; for at eight years old she

did not know her letters.

In 1760 Mr. Burney quitted Lynn for London, and took a house in Poland

Street; a situation which had been fashionable in the reign of Queen

Anne, but which, since that time, had been deserted by most of its

wealthy and noble inhabitants. He afterwards resided in St. Martin's

Street, on the south side of Leicester Square. His house there is still

well known, and will continue to be well known as long as our island

retains any trace of civilization; for it was the dwelling of Newton,

and the square turret which distinguishes it from all the surrounding

buildings was Newton's observatory.

Mr. Burney at once obtained as many pupils of the most respectable

description as he had time to attend, and was thus enabled to support

his family, modestly indeed, and frugally, but in comfort and

independence. His professional merit obtained for him the degree of

Doctor of Music from the University of Oxford; and his works on subjects

connected with his art gained for him a place, respectable, though

certainly not eminent, among men of letters.

The progress of the mind of Frances Burney, from her ninth to her

twenty-fifth year, well deserves to be recorded. When her education had

proceeded no further than the hornbook, she lost her mother, and

thenceforward she educated herself. Her father appears to have been as

bad a father as a very honest, affectionate, and sweet-tempered man can

well be. He loved his daughter dearly; but it never seems to have

occurred to him that a parent had other duties to perform to children

than that of fondling them. It would indeed have been impossible for him

to superintend their education himself. His professional engagements

occupied him all day. At seven in the morning he began to attend his

pupils, and, when London was full, was sometimes employed in teaching

till eleven at night. He was often forced to carry in his pocket a tin

box of sandwiches, and a bottle of wine and water, on which he dined in

a hackney coach, while hurrying from one scholar to another. Two of his

daughters he sent to a seminary at Paris; but he imagined that Frances

would run some risk of being perverted from the Protestant faith if she

were educated in a Catholic country, and he therefore kept her at home.

No governess, no teacher of any art or of any language, was provided for

her. But one of her sisters showed her how to write; and, before she was

fourteen, she began to find pleasure in reading.

It was not, however, by reading that her intellect was formed. Indeed,

when her best novels were produced, her knowledge of books was very

small. When at the height of her fame, she was unacquainted with the

most celebrated works of Voltaire and Moliere; and, what seems still

more extraordinary, had never heard or seen a line of Churchill, who,

when she was a girl, was the most popular of living poets. It is

particularly deserving of observation that she appears to have been by

no means a novel-reader. Her father's library was large; and he had

admitted into it so many books which rigid moralists generally exclude

that he felt uneasy, as he afterwards owned, when Johnson began to

examine the shelves. But in the whole collection there was only a single

novel, Fielding's Amelia.

An education, however, which to most girls would have been useless, but

which suited Fanny's mind better than elaborate culture, was in constant

progress during her passage from childhood to womanhood. The great book

of human nature was turned over before her. Her father's social position

was very peculiar. He belonged in fortune and station to the middle

class. His daughters seemed to have been suffered to mix freely with

those whom butlers and waiting maids call vulgar. We are told that they

were in the habit of playing with the children of a wigmaker who lived

in the adjoining house. Yet few nobles could assemble in the most

stately mansions of Grosvenor Square or St. James's Square a society so

various and so brilliant as was sometimes to be found in Dr. Burney's

cabin. His mind, though not very powerful or capacious, was restlessly

active, and, in the intervals of his professional pursuits, he had

contrived to lay up much miscellaneous information. His attainments, the

suavity of his temper, and the gentle simplicity of his manners, had

obtained for him ready admission to the first literary circles. While he

was still at Lynn, he had won Johnson's heart by sounding with honest

zeal the praises of the English Dictionary. In London the two friends

met frequently, and agreed most harmoniously. One tie, indeed, was

wanting to their mutual attachment. Burney loved his own art

passionately; and Johnson just knew the bell of St. Clement's church

from the organ. They had, however, many topics in common; and on winter

nights their conversations were sometimes prolonged till the fire had

gone out, and the candles had burned away to the wicks. Burney's

admiration of the powers which had produced Rasselas and The Rambler

bordered on idolatry. Johnson, on the other hand, condescended to growl

out that Burney was an honest fellow, a man whom it was impossible not

to like.

Garrick, too, was a frequent visitor in Poland Street and St. Martin's

Street. That wonderful actor loved the society of children, partly from

good nature, and partly from vanity. The ecstasies of mirth and terror,

which his gestures and play of countenance never failed to produce in a

nursery, flattered him quite as much as the applause of mature critics.

He often exhibited all his powers of mimicry for the amusement of the

little Burneys, awed them by shuddering and crouching as if he saw a

ghost, scared them by raving like a maniac in St. Luke's, and then at

once became an auctioneer, a chimney-sweeper, or an old woman, and made

them laugh till the tears ran down their cheeks.

But it would be tedious to recount the names of all the men of letters

and artists whom Frances Burney had an opportunity of seeing and

hearing. Colman, Twining, Harris, Baretti, Hawkesworth, Reynolds, Barry,

were among those who occasionally surrounded the tea table and supper

tray at her father's modest dwelling. This was not all. The distinction

which Dr. Burney had acquired as a musician, and as the historian of

music, attracted to his house the most eminent musical performers of

that age. The greatest Italian singers who visited England regarded him

as the dispenser of fame in their art, and exerted themselves to obtain

his suffrage. Pachierotti became his intimate friend. The rapacious

Agujari, who sang for nobody else under fifty pounds an air, sang her

best for Dr. Burney without a fee; and in the company of Dr. Burney even

the haughty and eccentric Gabrielli constrained herself to behave with

civility. It was thus in his power to give, with scarcely any expense,

concerts equal to those of the aristocracy. On such occasions the quiet

street in which he lived was blocked up by coroneted chariots, and his

little drawing-room was crowded with peers, peeresses, ministers, and

ambassadors. On one evening, of which we happen to have a full account,

there were present Lord Mulgrave, Lord Bruce, Lord and Lady Edgecumbe,

Lord Barrington from the War Office, Lord Sandwich from the Admiralty,

Lord Ashburnham, with his gold key dangling from his pocket, and the

French Ambassador, M. de Guignes, renowned for his fine person and for

his success in gallantry. But the great show of the night was the

Russian Ambassador, Count Orloff, whose gigantic figure was all in a

blaze with jewels, and in whose demeanor the untamed ferocity of the

Scythian might be discerned through a thin varnish of French politeness.

As he stalked about the small parlor, brushing the ceiling with his

toupee, the girls whispered to each other, with mingled admiration and

horror, that he was the favored lover of his august mistress; that he

had borne the chief part in the revolution to which she owed her throne;

and that his huge hands, now glittering with diamond rings, had given

the last squeeze to the windpipe of her unfortunate husband.

With such illustrious guests as these were mingled all the most

remarkable specimens of the race of lions, a kind of game which is

hunted in London every spring with more than Meltonian ardor and

perseverance. Bruce, who had washed down steaks cut from living oxen

with water from the fountains of the Nile, came to swagger and talk

about his travels. Omai lisped broken English, and made all the

assembled musicians hold their ears by howling Otaheitean love songs,

such as those with which Oberea charmed her Opano.

With the literary and fashionable society, which occasionally met under

Dr. Burney's roof, Frances can scarcely be said to have mingled. She was

not a musician, and could therefore bear no part in the concerts. She

was shy almost to awkwardness, and scarcely ever joined in the

conversation. The slightest remark from a stranger disconcerted her; and

even the old friends of her father who tried to draw her out could

seldom extract more than a Yes or a No. Her figure was small, her face

not distinguished by beauty. She was therefore suffered to withdraw

quietly to the background, and, unobserved herself, to observe all that

passed. Her nearest relations were aware that she had good sense, but

seem not to have suspected that, under her demure and bashful

deportment, were concealed a fertile invention and a keen sense of the

ridiculous. She had not, it is true, an eye for the fine shades of

character. But every marked peculiarity instantly caught her notice and

remained engraven on her imagination. Thus while still a girl, she had

laid up such a store of materials for fiction as few of those who mix

much in the world are able to accumulate during a long life. She had

watched and listened to people of every class, from princes and great

officers of state down to artists living in garrets, and poets familiar

with subterranean cookshops. Hundreds of remarkable persons had passed

in review before her, English, French, German, Italian, lords and

fiddlers, deans of cathedrals and managers of theatres, travellers

leading about newly caught savages, and singing women escorted by deputy

husbands.

So strong was the impression made on the mind of Frances by the society

which she was in the habit of seeing and hearing, that she began to

write little fictitious narratives as soon as she could use her pen with

ease, which, as we have said, was not very early. Her sisters were

amused by her stories; but Dr. Burney knew nothing of their existence;

and in another quarter her literary propensities met with serious

discouragement. When she was fifteen, her father took a second wife. The

new Mrs. Burney soon found out that her stepdaughter was fond of

scribbling, and delivered several good-natured lectures on the subject.

The advice no doubt was well meant, and might have been given by the

most judicious friend; for at that time, from causes to which we may

hereafter advert, nothing could be more disadvantageous to a young lady

than to be known as a novel-writer. Frances yielded, relinquished her

favorite pursuit, and made a bonfire of all her manuscripts.[8]

She now hemmed and stitched from breakfast to dinner with scrupulous

regularity. But the dinners of that time were early; and the afternoon

was her own. Though she had given up novel-writing she was still fond of

using her pen. She began to keep a diary, and she corresponded largely

with a person who seems to have had the chief share in the formation of

her mind. This was Samuel Crisp, an old friend of her father. His name,

well known, near a century ago, in the most splendid circles of London,

has long been forgotten. His history is, however, so interesting and

instructive, that it tempts us to venture on a digression.

Long before Frances Burney was born, Mr. Crisp had made his entrance

into the world, with every advantage. He was well connected and well

educated. His face and figure were conspicuously handsome; his manners

were polished; his fortune was easy; his character was without stain: he

lived in the best society; he had read much; he talked well; his taste

in literature, music, painting, architecture, sculpture, was held in

high esteem. Nothing that the world can give seemed to be wanting to his

happiness and respectability, except that he should understand the

limits of his powers, and should not throw away distinctions which were

within his reach in the pursuit of distinctions which were unattainable.

"It is an uncontrolled truth," says Swift, "that no man ever made an ill

figure who understood his own talents, nor a good one who mistook them."

Every day brings with it fresh illustrations of this weighty saying; but

the best commentary that we remember is the history of Samuel Crisp. Men

like him have their proper place, and it is a most important one, in the

Commonwealth of Letters. It is by the judgment of such men that the rank

of authors is finally determined. It is neither to the multitude, nor to

the few who are gifted with great creative genius, that we are to look

for sound critical decisions. The multitude, unacquainted with the best

models, are captivated by whatever stuns and dazzles them. They deserted

Mrs. Siddons to run after Master Betty; and they now prefer, we have no

doubt, Jack Sheppard to Von Artevelde. A man of great original genius,

on the other hand, a man who has attained to mastery in some high walk

of art, is by no means to be implicitly trusted as a judge of the

performances of others. The erroneous decisions pronounced by such men

are without number. It is commonly supposed that jealousy makes them

unjust. But a more creditable explanation may easily be found. The very

excellence of a work shows that some of the faculties of the author have

been developed at the expense of the rest; for it is not given to the

human intellect to expand itself widely in all directions at once, and

to be at the same time gigantic and well proportioned. Whoever becomes

preeminent in any art, nay, in any style of art, generally does so by

devoting himself with intense and exclusive enthusiasm to the pursuit of

one kind of excellence. His perception of other kinds of excellence is

therefore too often impaired. Out of his own department he praises and

blames at random, and is far less to be trusted than the mere

connoisseur, who produces nothing, and whose business is only to judge

and enjoy. One painter is distinguished by his exquisite finishing. He

toils day after day to bring the veins of a cabbage leaf, the folds of a

lace veil, the wrinkles of an old woman's face, nearer and nearer to

perfection. In the time which he employs on a square foot of canvas, a

master of a different order covers the walls of a palace with gods

burying giants under mountains, or makes the cupola of a church alive

with seraphim and martyrs. The more fervent the passion of each of these

artists for his art, the higher the merit of each in his own line, the

more unlikely it is that they will justly appreciate each other. Many

persons who never handled a pencil probably do far more justice to

Michael Angelo than would have been done by Gerard Douw, and far more

justice to Gerard Douw than would have been done by Michael Angelo.

It is the same with literature. Thousands, who have no spark of the

genius of Dryden or Wordsworth, do to Dryden the justice which has never

been done by Wordsworth, and to Wordsworth the justice which, we

suspect, would never have been done by Dryden. Gray, Johnson,

Richardson, Fielding, are all highly esteemed by the great body of

intelligent and well-informed men. But Gray could see no merit in

Rasselas; and Johnson could see no merit in the Bard. Fielding thought

Richardson a solemn prig; and Richardson perpetually expressed contempt

and disgust for Fielding's lowness.

Mr. Crisp seems, as far as we can judge, to have been a man eminently

qualified for the useful office of a connoisseur. His talents and

knowledge fitted him to appreciate justly almost every species of

intellectual superiority. As an adviser he was inestimable. Nay, he

might probably have held a respectable rank as a writer, if he would

have confined himself to some department of literature in which nothing

more than sense, taste, and reading was required. Unhappily he set his

heart on being a great poet, wrote a tragedy in five acts on the death

of Virginia, and offered it to Garrick, who was his personal friend.

Garrick read, shook his head, and expressed a doubt whether it would be

wise in Mr. Crisp to stake a reputation, which stood high, on the

success of such a piece. But the author, blinded by ambition, set in

motion a machinery such as none could long resist. His intercessors were

the most eloquent man and the most lovely woman of that generation. Pitt

was induced to read Virginia, and to pronounce it excellent. Lady

Coventry, with fingers which might have furnished a model to sculptors,

forced the manuscript into the reluctant hand of the manager; and, in

the year 1754, the play was brought forward.

Nothing that skill or friendship could do was omitted. Garrick wrote

both prologue and epilogue. The zealous friends of the author filled

every box; and by their strenuous exertions, the life of the play was

prolonged during ten nights. But, though there was no clamorous

reprobation, it was universally felt that the attempt had failed. When

Virginia was printed, the public disappointment was even greater than at

the representation. The critics, the Monthly Reviewers in particular,

fell on plot, characters, and diction without mercy, but, we fear, not

without justice. We have never met with a copy of the play; but, if we

may judge from the scene which is extracted in the Gentleman's Magazine,

and which does not appear to have been malevolently selected, we should

say that nothing but the acting of Garrick, and the partiality of the

audience, could have saved so feeble and unnatural a drama from instant

damnation.

Critical and Historical Essays, Volume III (of 3) · 第 27 / 60 段