Melmotte undertook the chairmanship of the Board of Directors in

England, and he very quickly found willing buyers of shares, hopes,

and dreams. Like Professor Harold Hill in _The Music Man_, "When he

dances, the piper pays him." But when he makes his speech to his

directors, it is one that would not do for BBC. In its production,

David Suchet is Melmotte larger than life, full of vitality,

projecting himself with a powerful personality. Trollope's text

would not have been such good theater; in it we see a man who is not

eloquent, mostly looking at his plate. His eager audience, however,

cheers him "to the echo."

The way we live now is portrayed not as a society that is sold a bill

of goods by a huckster, but as one that carried the huckster out over

his head even further than he might have ventured on his own. "It can

hardly be said of him that he had intended to play so high a game,

but the game that he had intended to play had become thus high of its

own accord. A man cannot always restrain his own doings and keep them

within the limits which he had himself planned for them."

Fisker is the little tugboat that nudges the mighty Melmotte out into

the deep. "He had sprung out of some Californian gully, was perhaps

ignorant of his own father and mother, and had tumbled up in the

world on the strength of his own audacity. But, such as he was, he

had sufficed to give the necessary impetus for rolling Augustus

Melmotte onwards into almost unprecedented commercial greatness."

What Melmotte does understand is "credit." In attempting to browbeat

Paul Montague, Melmotte rages, "Gentlemen who don't know the nature

of credit, how strong it is--as the air--to buoy you up; how slight

it is--as a mere vapour--when roughly touched, can do an amount of

mischief of which they themselves don't in the least understand the

extent!"

Melmotte does of course come to grief, from having forged the

signature of Dolly Longstaffe, feckless son of Adolphus Longstaffe,

authorizing transfer of the title deed for the house to Melmotte.

He also forged his daughter's signature and his secretary Croll's

signature to a document giving him access to his daughter Marie's

money. Elected to Parliament at about this time, the rumors of

the forgery cause his stock prices to collapse. Melmotte's final

performance is to go drunk to the House, attempt a speech, fall to

the floor, go home and commit suicide with prussic acid.

Set against these affairs of such great pith and moment, the story

of Winifred Hurtle is a welcome relief. She was the American woman

(another foreigner in England) who pursued Paul Montague to England,

where she asserts her rights as an engaged woman, threatening legal

action if Paul should break their engagement, and presumably spending

several nights with him, according to a narrative a bit skimpy in

such details.

The memorable climax of the story is the suicide of Melmotte; but

Trollope lets the dark side die with the great financier. There are a

few marriages. And the share prices of the South Central Pacific and

Mexican Railway begin to rise again as Fisker gets back to work on

selling shares in America. What went up came down; and it came back

up a little.

We follow the fates of a large cast of characters. Perhaps we don't

see that much into the soul of Melmotte. His actions and words

speak for him. For once, Trollope doesn't take us into the head

of a character who plays such a pivotal role. But we follow the

meditations of Paul Montague, Hetta Carbury, and others in the usual

detail. Not such a likeable lot, but their stories hang together and

justify claims that this is among Trollope's greatest novels, if

not the greatest. It was Trollope's longest novel, and perhaps its

greatest accomplishment is that the reader is entertained by the

light touch that keeps such a dreary story of human stupidity from

being abandoned after a few chapters.

WHAT'S A POOR GIRL TO DO?

THE AMERICAN SENATOR

Elias Gotobed is the American senator in Trollope's novel of the

same name. And in the last chapter the author reveals that Larry

Twentyman, a rising young yeoman farmer, "has in truth been our

hero." But more memorable than either of these is Arabella Trefoil,

the husband hunter. Life was not easy for ambitious Victorian women.

Success might have been achieved, with great difficulty, in several

different endeavors, but the only path that really led a woman to a

high place in society was through birth or marriage. And to this end

Arabella aspired.

She herself did not care much for pleasure. But she did care to

be a great lady--one who would be allowed to swim out of rooms

before others, one who could snub others, one who could show real

diamonds when others wore paste, one who might be sure to be asked

everywhere, even by the people who hated her. She rather liked

being hated by women and did not want any man to be in love with

her--except as far as might be sufficient for the purpose of

marriage.

Her great sin is that she pursues Lord Rufford, a more eligible

catch, while still engaged to John Morton, squire of Bragton. And in

introducing her, the author does tell us, "She had had many lovers,

and had been engaged to not a few." No one pretends that Trollope was

an advocate of feminism. And she hardly emerges as a heroine. And yet

a sympathetic reader of the present day can see her as a victim of

her times. What, indeed, was a poor girl to do?

Poor, yes, but not without some family connections--enough to put her

on the bubble of society--enough, perhaps, to make her feel obliged

to reach for success. Her father was the younger brother of a duke.

Her other assets were strength and determination, beauty, wit, and

enough freedom from scruples to lead her into trouble. "As for caring

about him, Mamma," she had once said of a suitor, "of course I don't.

He is nasty and odious in every way. But I have got to do the best I

can, and what is the use of talking about such trash as that?"

If Arabella is the memorable character, her memorable scene is the

one in the postchaise after a hunt when she succeeds in drawing from

Lord Rufford a positive response that he loves her--but nothing more.

At this point she knows that he will go no further, but she resolves

to use what she has gained to try to bring him to the altar, fainting

helplessly upon his shoulder. As it happens, Lord Ruffton calls her

bluff and escapes. Can you blame a girl for trying?

What of the American senator? In Elias Gotobed we find the prototype

of the Ugly American, described in the novel that gave the

phrase to our political vocabulary, as pretentious, loud, and

ostentatious--changed, in some way, when they leave their native

land. Senator Gotobed's sins in England are a bit different. Loud,

yes. Lacking in tact, yes. Convinced of the superiority of American

ways, yes. But unlike the Ugly American in Vietnam, Mr. Gotobed was

not required to expose his bad manners to a third world country; his

opportunity was to go to the mother country and demonstrate how a

rebellious child behaved toward the parent.

We are introduced to Mr. Gotobed as he meets his host John Morton,

the absentee squire, and views Bragton Hall--"quite a pile," he

declares.

Mr. Gotobed is diligent in his research and amasses enough data to

prepare a lecture for the edification of the English public. He

accurately identifies some English ways, such as primogeniture,

voting restrictions, and inappropriate clerical wealth, which would

not much longer survive the scrutiny of the masses. One suspects that

Trollope was using this as another means of exposing these little

ways for the entertainment of his readers, and he was able to use a

broader brush for this purpose than he used in his own depictions of

these same institutions. As an American, I find Mr. Gotobed a rather

tiresome caricature of the nineteenth century American. But his

likeness resembles a number of others so closely that I fear I might

have found some of the real Americans of the time rather tiresome.

The virtues of the English way of life are not lost on Mr. Gotobed.

He concedes in his letters to his friend in the USA that the English

gentleman is indeed charming, even though idle; pleasant and able to

discuss almost any subject, even though he may know very little about

it; and hospitable. In addition to these gratuitous observations,

he does insert himself into the activities of the community by

supporting the cause of Mr. Dan Goarly, accused of poisoning Lord

Rufford's foxes.

And here we have the mystery of the red herrings. In an earlier

incarnation of the battle between fox hunters and those who

considered it a barbaric sport, the animal rights advocates sometimes

left red herrings in a fox's path, obscuring the scent so that the

hounds were unable to stay on the right trail. Hence our term that

applies to a diversion that takes one off the correct pathway to

solving a problem. And in this case it was worse. It was suspected

that the herrings were laced with strychnine to poison the hounds.

Mr. Gotobed, ardent in his opposition to the absurd sport of hunting

and killing foxes, defies the conventional wisdom of the village that

knows Goarly to be a scoundrel, because he thinks any sabotage of a

fox hunt is worthy of support. In this effort he fails.

An ardent devotee of fox hunting, Trollope often used the hunt as a

piece of the plot in his stories, and his descriptions of the sport

convey the authenticity of the literate sportsman. Each of my two

paperback editions of _The American Senator_ show hunt scenes on the

cover. And in this novel the hunt shows us Senator Gotobed in his

quixotic defense of sabotaging the sport, and Arabella Trefoil on the

hunt for Lord Rufford.

The world of the English gentry of which Trollope wrote was not such

a large one that prominent characters from other stories might not

sometimes make their appearance; and the faithful Trollope reader

will smile to get a glimpse of Lady Chiltern and the Duchess of

Omnium, old friends from the world of the Palliser series, as they

visit the home of the Duke of Mistletoe, Arabella Trefoil's uncle.

And one last bit of trivia: When Senator Gotobed presents his lecture

enumerating the follies of the English, he is shouted down and some

cry, "_Buncombe!_" Also spelled bunkum and sometimes shortened to

bunk, this term for nonsense traveled across the Atlantic as the

legacy of a congressman from North Carolina, whose district included

Buncombe County, after he felt obliged to "make a speech for

Buncombe" in Congress.

The main plot is complicated and a bit commonplace, introduced in the

first chapters that require the reader to go through with a marking

pencil to identify the players, their generations, and their family

relationships. The requisite dues having been paid, the reader may

then go on with the story, but one is still obliged to return to

these chapters for reference. Less patient generations of readers

have limited tolerance of such introductions, even though some of

the author's capsule comments can be quite quotable, as in this

observation in describing Lawrence Twentyman: "And his farming was

well done; for though he was, out-and-out, a gentleman-farmer,

he knew how to get the full worth in work done for the fourteen

shillings a week that he paid to his labourers--a deficiency in which

knowledge is the cause why gentlemen in general find farming so very

expensive an amusement."

If Lawrence Twentyman is the real hero of the story, he is a

frustrated hero, unsuccessful from start to end in his courtship

of Mary Masters, threatening to sell his farm and emigrate to New

Zealand when he fails to win her. He loses Mary, daughter of the

lawyer whose family has handled the Morton family business for

generations, to Reginald Morton, some fifteen years their senior and

heir to the property. Reginald's cousin, John Morton, is the squire

of Bragton until his untimely death of "gastric fever." (What was

"gastric fever?" Did he have typhoid fever? Or just a convenient

diagnosis in the "chapter of accidents" that a novelist must resort

to?) John is a victim of Arabella's scheming, introduced as her

fiancé in a match with no outward signs of affection. He is employed

in the foreign office, is assigned to the United States, is known by

his colleagues as "The Paragon," and is later assigned to Patagonia,

a remote outpost of the foreign service. John's grandmother dreams up

schemes that require closer attention to family feuds than the casual

reader will be willing to undertake; Reginald's great-aunt Lady

Ushant is the good gentlewoman who is Reginald's champion, and she

also befriends Mary Masters. Mary is constantly harassed by her

wicked stepmother who urges her to accept Larry Twentyman and avoid

the temptation to associate with the gentry. In particular, Mary is

urged not to go "Ushanting" by visiting kind Lady Ushant.

This is all well and good, and it's enough to keep the story going;

but it's pretty predictable Trollope fare. Arabella, the American

Senator, and the poisoned red herrings are the spice to the story.

LESSER BARCHESTER

IS HE POPENJOY?

_Is He Popenjoy?_ puts us in familiar Trollope territory: the

cathedral and close, and the manor house. We have a lord of the

manor, the Marquis of Brotherton, who exercises his rights with

such persistent rudeness that one is hard pressed to think of any

redeeming virtues; and from there the cast of characters is a

familiar one: his younger brother, Lord George, a lesser Plantagenet

Palliser, a dull fellow who marries a true heroine, Mary Lovelace,

and proves that he hardly deserves her when he allows himself to get

his fingers burned by his first lover, Adelaide Houghton, because

he can't figure out how to avoid it. Mary's father, the Dean of

Brotherton, is a lesser Archdeacon Grantly, rich enough to provide

money for his impoverished son-in-law, and too ambitious and proud

to keep from offending Lord George with his largesse. Lord George

has four ugly sisters, close to a straight copy from Cinderella's

stepsisters, who intimidate poor Mary with their family position and

their good works for the poor. One of them, Lady Susanna, is worse

than the others and at one time visits Mary as an unwelcome duenna.

The eldest, Lady Sarah, is better than the others and sometimes sees

the light.

Essentially a comic novel, it is almost a farce. The curious

interrogatory title (a bit clumsy, like _Can You Forgive Her?_) is

finally elucidated after about a hundred pages when it is learned

that the hated Marquis, who has left England to live in Italy,

has (perhaps) married an Italian countess and has had a son, Lord

Popenjoy. But no Englishman can trust the Italian institutions. Is he

really married? Is the child legitimate? "Lord Popenjoy" is the title

of the heir to the Marquis. Is he really Popenjoy?

The Dean doubts it, for if the Marquis has no legitimate son, the

title will pass to his brother Lord George at his death; and then

the Dean's grandson, should he have one, will be next in line. The

Marquis's sibs are all skeptical, but they are hesitant to offend

their brother. The Dean does not hesitate.

The story proceeds as the Marquis advances from villainy to villainy;

he writes to announce the birth of his son and that he will return

home. His mother, four sisters, and brother are all to be turned out

and obliged to move far away from the family estate. He finally makes

his appearance, one third of the way into the book, and insults them

all, saving his most cutting sarcasm for the dean, whom he refers to

as "that stable boy."

Mary is a credible heroine. She likes to have fun, and she is a

bit indiscreet with her friend Jack de Baron, whom she unwittingly

encourages to the point that he falls in love with her after she has

become Lady George. And the author, who tells us a lot, never tells

us so in so many words, but she surely loves him. But the author does

tell us that she succeeds in her effort to come to love her husband.

Halfway through the book, "She was ever trying to be in love with

him, but had never yet succeeded in telling even herself that she

had succeeded." But in the process of fighting off a rival--Adelaide

Houghton, whom she never forgives--she becomes pregnant, and

enduring a separation related to her husband's resentment of his

father-in-law's interference in family affairs, she finally convinces

herself that she has succeeded in learning to love her husband.

Among the Victorian customs that jar the current reader, that of the

wife's duty to obedience is a note that clangs: "The husband would

of course be indignant at his wife's disobedience in not having left

London when ordered by him to do so."

The author indulges in some sideswipes at the movement for the rights

of women. The German advocate is shown to be a money-grubber, and the

American expert with the nasal twang, Dr. Olivia Q. Fleabody, "made

a rapid fortune out of the proceeds of the hall." Women came twice

a week to hear her preach that "a glorious era was at hand in which

women would be chosen by constituencies, would wag their heads in

courts of law, would buy and sell in Capel Court, and have balances

at their bankers."

A woman's duty was to find a husband, and the man's duty was to make

it difficult for her. All this sounds as though P. G. Wodehouse had

read Trollope and had taken it a bit farther.

He did not mean to marry Guss Mildmay. He did not suppose that she

thought he meant to marry her. He did not love her, and he did

not believe very much in her love for him. But . . . [he] had run

his bark on to the rock, which it had been the whole study of his

navigation to avoid. He had committed the one sin which he had

always declared to himself that he never would commit. This made

him unhappy.

Mr. Groschut, the dean's secretary, plays Mr. Slope to the bishop.

His letter to the rude Marquis is the only flattering or kind letter

the Marquis receives. (The family tries to be nice to the Marquis,

but they don't flatter like Mr. Groschut does.) And in the end Mr.

Groschut is banished, honored only by being the subject of the book's

last paragraph: "Of Mr. Groschut it is only necessary to say that

he is still at Pugsty, vexing the souls of his parishioners by

sabbatical denunciations."

This book could be legitimately recommended in a paraphrase of the

familiar line: "If you loved _Barchester Towers_, you'll like _Is He

Popenjoy?_" No, that's not strong enough. If you loved _Barchester

Towers_, you'll really like _Is He Popenjoy?_.

TOO NEAR THE PRECIPICE

AN EYE FOR AN EYE

The Cliffs of Moher, now among the sites being considered for an

upcoming list of the Seven Wonders of the World, have become the most

visited tourist attraction in Ireland. However, there were only a few

other visitors when our own little family of five, mist swirling in

our faces, paid our respects in 1974. These sheer precipices, facing

the Atlantic from the western coast of Ireland, had shed their cloud

cover; and our primary concern was to keep the children away from the

edge.

Young Frederick Neville, the new Earl of Scroope after his uncle's

death, gave no thought to how close he was to the brink as he stood

there with Mrs. O'Hara while her daughter Kate, pregnant with the

young Earl's child, waited in the cottage. That was the problem, of

course: the young Earl paid little heed as to how near he might come

to any precipice--hence the liaison with Kate O'Hara, a beautiful

Irish lass whose cottage was not so far from his regimental quarters

as to prevent his frequent visits. This connection, so offensive to

his family at Scroope Manor in Dorsetshire, is the story of _An Eye

for an Eye_, written by Anthony Trollope in 1870.

This short novel is set both in Ireland and in England. After setting

his first two novels in Ireland, Trollope later returned to the Irish

countryside for _Castle Richmond_ and, some ten years later, _An Eye

for an Eye_, which he wrote shortly after a return visit to Ireland.

The towering physical feature of the story is the collection of

cliffs. The towering social institution is the order of the nobility

of England. Like other institutions, practices, and ideas that appear

to be threatened by common sense, this one required vigilant defense

and faithful observance of its demands. In this story we find young

Frederick Neville called, somewhat to his surprise, by his uncle

the Earl of Scroope to be his heir. It would be inconvenient for

Frederick to become the Earl. A handsome young man in the process of

sowing his wild oats, he had a few more to sow.

And so he does. Frederick returns to his regiment in Ireland and

pursues his infatuation with Kate O'Hara of the lonely Ardkill

cottage, knowing as he does so that whatever her personal attractions

and gifts, he lacks the courage to present her in Dorsetshire as

Countess of Scroope. The Earl, before his unexpected death, insists

that Fred abandon his Irish conquest and marry the fair and well-born

Sophie Mellerby.

The women weigh in pretty heavily on the issue. Kate's mother, we

learn, has been married to a Captain O'Hara, presumed to have died

after misadventures. We see her walking beneath the cliffs, where

she would remain for hours, "with her hat in her hand and her hair

drenched."

In this she anticipated the memorable Sarah Woodruff, played by Meryl

Streep in the film adaptation of John Fowles's novel _The French

Lieutenant's Woman_, hooded and patient, looking out at the storm

from the end of the Cobb in Lyme Regis. In each case, the impression

is the same: don't trifle with this woman.

But the drumbeat of the story has begun. Mrs. O'Hara reflects as

she observes the development of love between Frederick Neville and

her daughter: "Men are wolves to women, and utterly merciless when

feeding high on their lust."

After the Earl dies, Frederick must decide. Although his brother Jack

advises him to marry the Irish lass and bring her home and be done

with it, Frederick is swayed by the advice of his aunt, the late

Earl's widow. Lady Scroope, in turn, relies on information from her

friend Lady Mary Quin, who sends her regular letters with the gossip

from Ireland. Lady Mary entertained no qualms as to the young Earl's

duty: he must marry Sophie Wellerby. "There are women, who in regard

to such troubles as now existed at Ardkill cottage, always think that

the woman should be punished as the sinner and that the man should be

assisted to escape."

The die is cast. Although Frederick, as the new Earl, attempts to

have it both ways and pull a Duke of Windsor (in a century before

Wally Simpson's disruption of the monarchy), his proposal to leave

the property to his brother and take Kate to Europe and marry her

there is scorned by his brother and by the priest who advises Kate

and her mother.

And so the young Earl finds himself on the cliffs of Moher, near the

edge and confronted by the mother of the woman he has deflowered and

deceived.

Trollope framed his story by introducing us to a madwoman in a

private asylum in western England, who cornered everyone she met

with her mantra, "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth." The

narrator then reassures the reader that there will be no more of the

asylum story, but there will be the story of how the woman happened

to come there; and the reader thus knows in advance that this will be

a story with a violent ending.

It's a relatively short (160 pages) novel with a single thread

that leads the players to their fate. They are not presented as

bad people. The reader can have some sympathy for each of them as

they make their way along, overmatched and overshadowed by the

overwhelming Cliffs of Moher and the binding institutions of the

time.

WHAT HAPPENS IN AUSTRALIA . . .

JOHN CALDIGATE

Anthony Trollope sailed to Australia in 1871 to visit his son Fred.

(He wrote one novel, _Lady Anna_, during eight weeks of the voyage

out.) While visiting a goldfield in Currajong, New South Wales, he

met one of his son's school mates who had visited in the Trollope

home. As he described it in _Australia and New Zealand_ (1876):

I saw him in front of his little tent, which he occupied in

partnership with an experienced working miner, eating a beefsteak

out of his frying-pan with his claspknife. . . . He had no

friend near him but his mining friend,--or mate, as he called

him. . . . He had been softly nurtured, well educated, and was a

handsome fellow to boot; and there he was eating a nauseous lump

of beef out of a greasy frying-pan with his pocketknife, just in

front of the contiguous blankets stretched on the ground, which

constituted the beds of himself and his companion. It may be that

he will strike gold, and make a fortune.

The Way They Lived Then Serious Interviews, Strong Women, and Lessons for Life in the Novels of Anthony Trollope · 第 13 / 17 段