On question

Mas. no. Con^t ay. N. Y. ay. N. J. ay. P^a ay. Del. no. M^d ay.

V^a ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.

M^r Elseworth moved that the rule of suffrage in the 2^d branch be the

same with that established by the articles of Confederation. "He was not

sorry on the whole he said that the vote just passed, had determined

against this rule in the first branch. He hoped it would become a ground

of compromise with regard to the 2^d branch. We were partly national;

partly federal. The proportional representation in the first branch was

conformable to the national principle & would secure the large States

ag^{st} the small. An equality of voices was conformable to the federal

principle and was necessary to secure the Small States ag^{st} the

large. He trusted that on this middle ground a compromise would take

place. He did not see that it could on any other. And if no compromise

should take place, our meeting would not only be in vain but worse than

in vain. To the Eastward he was sure Mass^{ts} was the only State that

would listen to a proposition for excluding the States as equal

political Societies, from an equal voice in both branches. The others

would risk every consequence rather than part with so dear a right. An

attempt to deprive them of it, was at once cutting the body of America

in two, and as he supposed would be the case, somewhere about this part

of it. The large States he conceived would notwithstanding the equality

of votes, have an influence that would maintain their superiority.

Holland, as had been admitted (by M^r Madison) had, notwithstanding a

like equality in the Dutch Confederacy, a prevailing influence in the

public measures. The power of self defence was essential to the small

States. Nature had given it to the smallest insect of the creation. He

could never admit that there was no danger of combinations among the

large States. They will like individuals find out and avail themselves

of the advantage to be gained by it. It was true the danger would be

greater if they were contiguous and had a more immediate common

interest. A defensive combination of the small States was rendered more

difficult by their great number. He would mention another consideration

of great weight. The existing confederation was founded on the equality

of the States in the article of suffrage: was it meant to pay no regard

to this antecedent plighted faith. Let a strong Executive, a Judiciary &

Legislative power be created, but Let not too much be attempted; by

which all may be lost. He was not in general a half-way man, yet he

preferred doing half the good we could, rather than do nothing at all.

The other half may be added, when the necessity shall be more fully

experienced.[120]

[120] In King's Notes another speech of Madison's is given

after Ellsworth's:

"_Madison._ One Gentleman from Connecticut has proposed

doing as much as is prudent now, leaving future amendments

to Posterity,--this is a dangerous doctrine. The Defects of

the Amphictionic League were acknowledged, but were

reformed. The Netherlands have four times attempted to make

amendments in their Confederation, but have failed in each

attempt. The Fear of innovation, the hue & Cry in favour of

the Liberty of the People will as they have done prevent the

necessary Reforms. If the States have equal Votes &

influence in the Senate we shall be in the utmost danger,

the minority of the People will govern the majority.

Delaware during the late war opposed and defeated an

Embargo, to which twelve States had agreed, and continued to

supply the enemy with Provisions in time of war."--King's

_Life and Times of Rufus King_, i., 612.

M^r Baldwin[121] could have wished that the powers of the General

Legislature had been defined, before the mode of constituting it had

been agitated. He should vote against the motion of M^r Elseworth, tho.

he did not like the Resolution as it stood in the Report of the

Committee of the whole. He thought the second branch ought to be the

representation of property, and that in forming it therefore some

reference ought to be had to the relative wealth of their Constituents,

and to the principles on which the Senate of Mass^{ts} was constituted.

He concurred with those who thought it w^d be impossible for the Gen^l

Legislature to extend its cares to the local matters of the States.[122]

Adj^d.

[121] "Mr. Baldwin is a Gentleman of superior abilities, and

joins in a public debate with great art and eloquence.

Having laid the foundation of a compleat classical education

at Harvard College, he pursues every other study with ease.

He is well acquainted with Books and Characters, and has an

accommodating turn of mind, which enables him to gain the

confidence of Men, and to understand them. He is a

practising Attorney in Georgia, and has been twice a Member

of Congress. Mr. Baldwin is about 38 years of

age."--Pierce's Notes _Am. Hist. Rev._, iii., 333.

[122] According to Yates, after Baldwin spoke: "Mr. Madison.

I would always exclude inconsistent principles in framing a

system of government. The difficulty of getting its defects

amended are great and sometimes insurmountable. The Virginia

state government was the first which was made, and though

its defects are evident to every person, we cannot get it

amended. The Dutch have made four several attempts to amend

their system without success. The few alterations made in it

were by tumult and faction, and for the worse. If there was

real danger, I would give the smaller states the defensive

weapons--But there is none from that quarter. The great

danger to our general government is the great southern and

northern interests of the continent, being opposed to each

other. Look to the votes in congress, and most of them stand

divided by the geography of the country, not according to

the size of the states.

"Suppose the first branch granted money, may not the second

branch, from state views, counteract the first? In congress,

the single state of Delaware prevented an embargo, at the

time that all the other states thought it absolutely

necessary for the support of the army. Other powers, and

those very essential, besides the legislative, will be given

to the second branch--such as the negativing all state laws.

I would compromise on this question, if I could do it on

correct principles, but otherwise not--if the old fabric of

the confederation must be the groundwork of the new, we must

fall."--Yates, _Secret Proceedings_, etc., 189.

The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1 · 第 80 / 114 题