NO AGREEMENT REACHED

Lord Haldane mentions that he was in communication with M. Jules

Cambon, the French Ambassador in Berlin, and recounted his

conversations to him. The Ambassador quite appreciated that the purpose

of the mission was to create a detente, as distinguished from an

entente. M. Jules Cambon reported his conversation with Lord Haldane to

M. Poincaré.

Lord Haldane had another conversation with the Chancellor in the hope

of arriving at a formula with regard to the navy. The Chancellor said

that the "forces he had to contend with were almost insuperable. Public

opinion in Germany expected a new law and the third squadron, and he

must have these. I said we could not contest Germany's right to do in

these matters, and indeed in other matters, as she pleased. But why not

postpone the shipbuilding for longer and adapt the law accordingly? * * *"

"The Chancellor said he would try. He asked me to consult the experts

in London and make a suggestion. I had said, he remarked, that

everything was good only on balance, and Germany must for a greater

end give up a minor advantage. The new squadron and the new fleet law

she must have, but it was a question for the experts, on which he did

not pronounce, whether a retardation of greater magnitude than Tirpitz

proposed might not be possible. I promised to let him know privately

the state of feeling here about the Tirpitz proposals on my return."

The Ministers then endeavored to arrive at a formula, the whole purpose

of which was to bring about conditions which would prevent to endeavor

to get a definition of the duty of neutrality; and, in the event of

war, to combine in order to localize the conflict.

After Lord Haldane's return to London, negotiations in search of

a formula were continued. Prince Lichnowsky preserved a friendly

atmosphere, but the German Government never agreed to conditions

which would have safeguarded the neutrality of Belgium or maintained

her honorable obligations to our allies. The nearest they got at the

eleventh hour was, as Lord Grey said, "far too narrow an engagement for

us."

New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918 · 第 332 / 346 题