THE KAISER AND VON TIRPITZ

On the following day, Feb. 9, Lord Haldane had an interview with the

Emperor, the Chancellor, and Admiral Tirpitz on the navy, at which

Tirpitz held out for the new German naval program, which was discussed

at great length. Lord Haldane wrote:

"I insisted that fundamental modification was essential. The tone

was thoroughly friendly, but I felt that I had come to the most

difficult part of my task of getting material fit to bring back for

the consideration of my colleagues. The utmost I was able to get was

this: The Emperor was so disturbed at the idea that the world would not

believe in the reality of the agreement unless the shipbuilding program

was modified that he asked me what I would suggest. I said that it was

a too technical matter for me to discuss here, but that if he would not

drop the new law--which I saw he felt he could not--he might at least

drop out a ship. This idea was never abandoned, but Admiral Tirpitz

combated it so hard that I said: 'Well, can we not spread the tempo?'

After much talking we got to this, that, as I insisted that they must

not inaugurate the agreement by building an additional ship at once,

they should put off building the first ship till 1913, and then should

not lay down another till three years after, (1916,) and not lay down

the third till 1919."

"Admiral Tirpitz wanted us to give some understanding about our own

shipbuilding. He thought the two-power standard a hard one for Germany,

and, indeed, Germany could not make any admission about it. I said it

was not a matter of admission. Germany must be free and we must be

free, and we should probably lay down two keels to their one. In this

case the initiative was not with us, but with them. An idea occurred to

all of us on this observation that we should try to avoid defining a

standard proportion in the agreement, and that, indeed, we should say

nothing at all about shipbuilding in the if the political agreement

was concluded the Emperor should at once announce to the German public

that this entirely new fact modified his desire for the fleet law as

originally conceived, and that it should be delayed and spread out to

the extent we had discussed. For the rest, each of us would remain

masters in our own houses as far as naval matters were concerned."

"The Emperor thought the agreement would affect profoundly the tendency

in shipbuilding, and he certainly should not desire to go beyond the

three ships. The fact of the agreement was the key to everything. The

Chancellor, he said, would propose to me this afternoon a formula which

he had drafted. I said that I would see the Chancellor and discuss

any further territorial questions with him, and would then return as

speedily as I could and report the good disposition which I had found

to my colleagues, and leave the difficulties of not being able to stop

shipbuilding more completely, and, indeed, all other matters to their

judgment. I could only assure the Emperor that I had been much struck

with the friendly disposition in Berlin, and that he would find a not

less friendly disposition in London."

New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918 · 第 331 / 346 题