LOSS OF BRITISH SHIPS

Those who prefer to do so may use long words like "psychology" and

"mentality," but the plain English of the situation is that the public

mind in the allied and neutral countries was greatly impressed by the

news that the British fleet had lost several ships, and by the fact

that these losses were announced in the earlier part of the official

communiqué concerning the battle. In the few great sea fights of which

anything was generally remembered, the British had not lost ships.

This, however, was far from being the universal rule.

In the great naval actions of the seventeenth century we lost many

ships. It was recognized that a fleet might be victorious and still

lose ships. The great Lord Hawke at Quiberon Bay lost ships. The

contending fleets of the present day are so very large that they recall

those of the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, when ships

were lost in action by both sides. This, especially in view of the

power of the naval ordnance of today, is almost certain to occur again.

There is a wide difference between the naval gun of the present day and

that of Nelson's and earlier times. The primary object of the older gun

was to cause casualties among the enemy's crews; the modern naval gun

is meant to destroy his ships. A fifteen-inch gun is not necessary to

kill or wound a man. Naval weapons would be complete failures if, in

sea fights, they were to prove incapable of destroying ships, and there

is no probability that the destruction will fall on one side only.

Mr. Frothingham's final conclusion is that the "actual tactical result

of the battle was indecisive." A very full definition of an indecisive

tactical result would be instructive. One result of the battle of

Jutland is beyond dispute and is in no way a matter of opinion. These

lines are being written on the 12th of May, 1918, close upon two years

after the battle of Jutland was fought. Not once during all that long

time has the German High Sea Fleet ventured on the high seas or done

more than just peep over the edge of its sheltering mine fields.

New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918 · 第 311 / 346 题