What, then, have we done? What have we attempted? What are our present

aims? It is not my purpose either to defend or to attack. I have only to

state what is being done. Nothing can be attempted in this direction

that is not open to abuses of one kind or another. The relief of

distress encourages the idle; help of every kind is seized upon by the

fraud and the impostor; if we feed and clothe the children their parents

have more money for drink; the most we can do is to choose the line that

seems open to the fewest objections and to exercise the most unremitting

vigilance, care, and caution. The worst feature in the whole chapter of

modern charity is that love and forbearance the most unwearied, devotion

the most unselfish, seem too often only to pauperize the people, to

induce more impudent frauds. But not always; we must take the line of

the greatest, not the least, resistance,—that which is hardest for the

worker, and certainly most unpopular with the subjects,—and we must

judge of results from what follows. All modern philanthropic effort

must, in order to be successful, be based upon the people understanding

quite clearly that such effort cannot, by any ingenuity or any lies and

legends, be turned to the encouragement of those who will not work.

I begin with the parish. There is at the present moment no more active

clergy in the world than our own; there is no organization more complete

than that of a well-worked London parish. The young men who now take

Holy Orders know, at the outset, that they must lead lives of perpetual

activity. There are the services of the parish church, with outlying

mission churches; there are Sunday-schools, there are clubs, there are

mothers’ meetings, there are amusements for the people—concerts and

entertainments for the winter; there is the supervision of the visiting

ladies who go about the parish and learn the history of all the tenants

in all the courts. There is the choir to be looked after, there are the

sick to be cared for, there are always people in distress and in need of

help—people for whom the vestry officers and workhouse officers can do

nothing; the despairing young clergyman very soon finds out that the

more you give to people who want help, the more people there are who

clamor for help; he has to learn, you see, the great lesson that in

certain social levels, where not to work should mean not to eat, no one

will do a stroke of work if he can avoid it. Some of the clergy never do

learn this lesson; they go on, all their lives, giving, doling,

distributing, and pauperizing.

The organization of a London parish on the modern line is amazing in the

extent of the aims and the variety of the work done. I have before me

the annual report of a parish. From this document, which is like most of

the other parochial annuals, it would seem the resolved endeavor of the

clergy to make every kind of helpful and civilized work spring from the

church and rest upon the church. In this report there are notices of

seventy-five associations of various kinds; among them are gilds and

fraternities, schools and classes; there are institutions purely

religious and purely secular; with the Bible classes and the gilds we

find the penny bank, the sharing club, the sale of clothes, the library,

the maternity society, the mothers’ meetings, the cookery class, and the

blanket society. All these associations are conducted by the vicar and

his four curates, assisted by a voluntary staff of about twenty ladies.

It is evident that without unpaid and voluntary assistance the work

could not be even attempted. The remarkable point—the “note” of the

time—is that this voluntary assistance is like the widow’s cruse—it

never fails.

[Illustration: The East London Mission.]

If, on the other hand, it is asked how far the people respond to the

assumption that everything is done by the church, it is necessary to

reply that the church, as a rule, remains comparatively empty. We have

seen elsewhere that the percentage of attendance at the Sunday services

of the parish or the district church was, fourteen years ago, a little

over three. Occasionally, however, when the vicar is a man of

exceptional character, one who succeeds in winning the respect and the

affection of the people so that they will follow him even into his

church, the services are well attended, and in the evening crowded.

There is, for example, a church in a district—a very poor and humble

district near Shoreditch: the church was built through the exertions of

the present vicar, who has succeeded in making the people attend. The

history of the man partly explains the phenomenon. Fifteen years ago,

when he went there, the place, consisting of a dozen miserable streets,

was one of the vilest kind. Violence, robbery, drunkenness, murder, life

in the most uncleanly forms imaginable prevailed in this slice of a

large, crowded parish, which this man cut off to make a parish by

itself. He sat down in the midst of them all, and he began. Observe that

the first lesson he had to teach them was that he was not afraid of

them; he was neither afraid of their threats nor of their proffered

violence nor of their tongues; he went about among the women—the owners

of those tongues—and opened up conversation with them; he spoke them

friendly; they gave him the retort unfriendly; he replied readily and

boldly, carrying the laugh against his adversaries; the common bludgeon

of Billingsgate he met with the gentle rapier of “chaff,” insomuch that

the women were first infuriated, then silenced, and then reduced to

friendliness, and, in this more desirable frame of mind, so remain. He

put up a temporary church; beside the church he started schools; he

opened a club for lads and the younger men; he provided his club with

things that attracted them—rough games and gymnastics; more than this,

he gave them boxing-gloves and taught them how to fight according to the

strict rules of the prize-ring. You think that this is not the ideal

amusement for a clergyman—wait a bit. The rules of the prize-ring are

rigid rules; they demand a good deal of study; they make boxing a duello

conducted according to rules of honor and courtesy. Now, when a lad has

learned to handle the gloves according to the rules he becomes a

stickler for them. Like Mrs. Battle over a game of whist, he exacts the

rigor of the game. As for the old methods—the stones in the knotted

handkerchief, the club, the short iron rod, and the cowardly boot—he

will have no more of them. Moreover, fifteen minutes with a stout

adversary, two or three returns to earth, and a shake-hand at the end,

knock the devil out of a lad—the devil of restlessness and of

pugnacity—give him a standard of honor, and make the rough-and-tumble in

the street no longer worthy of consideration.

Then the vicar built a “doss-house,” a place where men could sleep in

peace and cleanliness. And he lived among his people, spending every

evening of his life in club and doss-house and all day in the parish, so

that the people trusted him more and more; and not only did his club

overflow, but his church also began to fill—by this time it is no longer

a temporary thing of iron, but a lovely church, with painted windows and

carved work. In his services there is plenty of singing; he has

processions, which the people like, with banners and crosses, the choir

singing as they go. He also has incense, which I have never understood

to be other than a barbaric survival. Nor can I understand how any one

can endure the smell. Still, I suppose the people like it or he would

not have it, and, after all, for those who do like the smell it is

apparently harmless.

How many others have tried the same methods, but have failed! Why?

Because the one thing necessary for success in such work as this—nine

parts philanthropic and one part religious—is the magnetic power which

we call, in practical work, sympathy, and, in art or literature, genius.

The clergy, with or without this magnetic power, work day and night.

Never before has the Church of England possessed a clergy more devoted

to practical work. Never before, alas! has the Church possessed so few

scholars or so few preachers. Learning, save for a scholar here and

there, has deserted the Church of England. Eloquence has passed from her

pulpits to those of the Nonconformists. But the clergy work.

Unfortunately, the parishes are large; even a district church has often

ten thousand people or more, and those mostly poor, so that the struggle

would be, if it were not supplemented, almost hopeless.

It is supplemented in many ways. To begin with, in its civilizing work,

by the Board-school. The action of the London School Board is always

subjected to the fiercest light of hostile criticism, especially that of

the ratepayers, who have seen with disgust the rate mounting year by

year. There is, however, a consensus of agreement that the influence of

the schools has been to humanize the people in a manner actually visible

to all. The results are before us. The children of to-day are, it is

confessed even by opponents to the policy of the School Board, in every

respect better than those of twenty years ago, and this although,

despite laws and inspectors, there are still many children who escape

the meshes of the school net. The mothers understand that the teachers

demand certain things of them; that the children must present themselves

with hands and faces washed and with some attempt at neatness in their

dress; this gives rise to a certain shame at letting the children go

unwashed; perhaps, also, the thought of the school tyranny makes the

father remember on Saturday afternoon the responsibility of the

children, even to knocking off a pint or so.

As for the children themselves, they love the school and the teachers

and the lessons; this part of the day is their happiness. Whether in the

after life they will remember much of the scraps they learned—crumbs of

knowledge: the historical crumb, the geographical crumb—I know not, but

the important lessons of order and obedience are not readily forgotten;

they will remain; when these children grow up some of them will perhaps

join the company of disorder; but they will be rebels, not untaught

savages who know no law.

I have already spoken of the clubs for boys and girls. These clubs are

simply invaluable. They take the young people at a time when habits are

most easily formed, at a time of life when it is most desirable to give

them occupation and pursuits which will take them away from the dangers

of the streets.

For the better class of boys, those who should be taught the better

trades, especially those which require a knowledge of drawing,

designing, or machinery, there are the continuation schools, which are

carried on in the evening, and the Polytechnics. A Polytechnic is to the

young working lad what a public school or a college is to the upper

class. It not only teaches him a trade, that by which he is to live, but

it gives him discipline, obedience, responsibility, and the sense of

duty. It makes a man of him; it gives him honor and self-respect. There

are now lads in the London Polytechnics by thousands; many of them will

go out to the colonies; whether they emigrate or whether they stay at

home, they will become the very cream and flower of the working-people;

they will stand up wherever fate leads them as lifelong champions for

soberness and for industry. Not for them will be the wild dreams of

anarchy; not for them the follies of an impossible socialism; not for

them the derision of religion; not for them the hatred of the rich or

the jealousy of class. Not the least among the benefits and advantages

of the Polytechnic is the _esprit de corps_ promoted among them; they

are as proud of their “Poly” as any lad of Eton or any man of Balliol.

And the latest arrival from the place, wherever he goes, is sure to find

friends and advisers and helpers among the old boys of his “Poly.”

The Helping Hand in education is of such great importance that one may

dwell a little upon the machinery by which a clever and persevering lad

may rise from the very lowest levels to any honor or distinction which

the country has to offer. It is chiefly the Technical Education Board, a

body which has been in existence for some ten years, which supplies the

ladders. This Board is empowered by the London County Council to assist

in supplying technical instruction to schools and institutions which are

not conducted for private profit. The Board spends the sum of £170,000 a

year in maintaining and developing classes for technical education. The

most important of these institutions are the Polytechnics above

mentioned. There are twelve of these in and about London, of which two

are in our quarter of East London. The number of students in

Polytechnics—all of them, it is needless to say, of the

working-class—amounts to 45,000. The cost of maintaining them is

£120,000, of which the Board of Technical Education contributes £30,000;

a large sum is given by the City Charities Commission, and the rest is

given by half a dozen rich City companies. It is evident we have here a

very serious attempt at providing technical education for lads who are

to become the skilled workmen of the future. Formerly they were

apprenticed to various trades; the system of apprenticeship has fallen

into disuse; but it is found highly necessary, if this country is to

hold her own against foreign competition, to train the lads in workshops

and laboratories where they may learn every branch of their own trade.

There are excellent and fully equipped laboratories at the People’s

Palace and one or two other Polytechnics. As for the trades taught, they

are far too numerous to set down. All those trades which are connected

with engineering, with metal work, with gold- and silver-smiths’ work,

with enameling, wood engraving, bookbinding, decorating and painting,

carpentry, furniture- and cabinet-making, and a hundred other trades are

taught in these colleges of industry. There are art schools also for the

teaching of design, decoration, and all the art requirements of the

trades.

For the encouragement of the lads who have left school and are willing

to carry on their work the continuation classes were formed. The

Technical Board has established a system of scholarships by which a

ladder is placed in readiness for any boy or girl who can climb it.

There are six hundred small scholarships given every year by examination

to boys and girls who have passed the sixth standard in the elementary

schools; they are in value £8 for the first year, and £12 for the second

year. After two years the second ladder is reached. The student who has

shown, so far, that he is able to climb the ladder and would now give

further proof of ability, must be under sixteen, and his parents must

not be in the receipt of more than £400 a year. He may then gain by open

competition a scholarship giving him free education at some recognized

college of higher education, together with about £30 a year in money.

After three years, if he is able to climb still higher,—the number of

competitors now narrows,—he has a grand chance before him; he may win a

scholarship giving him free education at any university he may choose,

with £60 a year, tenable for three years. There are at present many such

scholars in residence at Oxford, Cambridge, and other universities.

In addition to these, the Board gives scholarships for art, for science

and technology, for horticulture, for sanitary science, and for domestic

economy. Besides this industrial help, the Board provides lectures,

especially for clerks, on commercial subjects.

It will be understood that by means of these scholarships a boy may work

his way, at little or no cost to his friends, from the position of

craftsman to that of a graduate in honors of Oxford and Cambridge. Think

what this means! The boy is lifted straight from the life of manual

labor, very likely monotonous labor, which is the lot of most, in which

he can never attain to fortune, honor, or distinction, to the life of

intellectual work; his companions will be those who stand in the very

forefront of science, literature, and art. A fellowship at his college

will enable him to be called to the bar; he may then aspire, with

reasonable hopes of success, to the honors of Queen’s counsel, Judge,

Solicitor-General, Chief Justice, or even Lord Chancellor. He may go

into the Church, and look forward, if with learning he has acquired

administrative power and preaching power, and, let us add, manners, to

becoming a bishop; he may remain at the university, a lecturer and

teacher of his own subject; he may become a professor of science, or he

may become an expounder of history. He may become a physician or a

surgeon. He may become a journalist, a dramatist, a novelist, a poet.

Whatever line he enters upon, he has climbed, by means of these three

ladders, up into the higher ranks, with all that the word means. He has

become, if he chooses,—and he cannot help choosing,—a gentleman. The

poor lad who climbs up does not always, it is true, become a gentleman.

Sometimes there remain still clinging to him certain rusticities;

sometimes ancestral traits, such as a thirst for strong drink, seize

him. As a rule, however, the lad who has climbed remains, he and his

children after him, in the rank, so dear to the British soul, of

undoubted gentility. If the sins of the father are visited upon the

children, then, surely the achievements and the virtues of the father

shall bring their rewards to the children—yea, even unto the third and

fourth generation.

[Illustration: The New Model Dwellings.]

After the parish work and the work of education I had placed that of

housing, but this has already been sufficiently considered.

The care of the sick comes next upon my list. There is a continual cry

ascending to the regions of the rich concerning the insufficiency of

hospital endowments. There is certainly no city better provided with

hospitals than London, nor any city where more money is annually

subscribed for their maintenance, nor any where the medical staff are

paid so little and do so much. In East London there is the magnificent

foundation of the London Hospital, which receives 11,500 in-patients

every year, has an endowment of £20,000 a year, and an additional

income, from voluntary subscriptions, of £40,000 a year. The story of

the Children’s Hospital and its beginnings in the hamlet of Ratcliffe

has been already told. And there are, in addition, “homes” of all kinds,

crêches for infants, nursing societies, and dispensaries. One mentions

these in passing, but a catalogue of endowments is not necessary.

Among the organizations for help must not be forgotten the fraternities

for mutual assistance, such as the Odd Fellows, the Foresters, and the

Hearts of Oak. These associations do not belong exclusively to East

London, but they have extensive branches here, and are, I believe, well

managed and on sound principles. They offer assistance in times of

misfortune, medical aid in sickness, and care of the widows and

fatherless. In this place they can only be mentioned.

For the women, a very large society is that called the

M.A.B.Y.S.—_i.e._, the “Metropolitan Association for Befriending Young

Servants.” It began by befriending young servants from the

workhouse—girls generally friendless and very forlorn—and has now

extended its work to include all young servants. Every lady in the

society undertakes the care of one or more servants, whom she visits or

invites to her own house on the Sunday “out.” These friendships are

often lifelong, and produce the best possible results.

The position of the workhouse girl is sometimes very pitiful. One such

girl recently came to my knowledge. In this case the girl had been

picked up as a baby in the streets; she had no family, no name, no

friends, no birthday even. When she found a friend in the M.A.B.Y.S. she

asked permission to take her friend’s birthday for her own, and to call

her friend’s cook her aunt, so that she might feel that she too could

enjoy, if only in imagination, what all the rest of the world

possesses—a birthday and a family.

There are six or seven free libraries in East London. Who was the

benefactor to humanity who first invented or discovered the free

library? Who was the philanthropist who first advocated the free

library? I do not know. But when one realizes what the free library

means one is carried away by admiration and gratitude. By means of the

free library we actually give to every person, however poor,—we _give_

him, as a free gift,—the whole of the literature of the world. If he

were a millionaire he could not acquire a greater gift that the poorest

lad enjoys who lives near a good free library. He can take books home

with him; he can study any subject he likes, if he is a student; or he

may read for his own pleasure only, and for amusement. More than this,

since none but good and worthy literature should be admitted to the free

library the readers cannot use its treasures without forming, purifying,

and elevating their taste. Now, taste in literature leads naturally, it

is believed by some, to corresponding preferences as regards the major

and the minor virtues and their opposites. For my own part, I regard the

librarian of a free library as a guardian of morals, a censor, a

teacher; those who receive books of him receive the continual

admonitions of the wisest and the best of men. A course of Shakspere is

in itself an education; a course of Scott may be said to teach history;

and a course of the best fiction in our language teaches what is meant

by the grand old name of gentleman. I look for the time when the demand

for books by the mass of the public will be in itself a selection of the

best and finest; when it will be impossible to reproach the people, as

is done to-day, with buying the ephemeral trash that is offered at a

penny, and neglecting the scholars and the poets and the wise ones of

ancient days. The free library is doing for the working-people what the

circulating library cannot do for its readers who go in broadcloth and

in silk. In the time to come, in the immediate future, it will perhaps

be the latter who read the rubbish and the former who will create the

demand for the nobler and the higher work.

Mention has already been made of the Sunday afternoon lecture. Other

attempts have been made to brighten the Sunday afternoon, always in

winter a difficult time to get through. There are organ recitals at the

People’s Palace, social meetings, with talk and sometimes lantern views,

and short addresses.

Perhaps the work that is done in East London for the waifs and strays is

the most remarkable, as it is certainly the most interesting.

[Illustration: Dr. Barnardo’s Home, Stepney Causeway.]

East London · 第 18 / 20 段