CHAPTER CXLIII.

OREGON TERRITORY: CONVENTIONS OF 1818 AND 1828: JOINT OCCUPATION:

ATTEMPTED NOTICE TO TERMINATE IT.

These conventions provided for the joint occupation of the countries

respectively claimed by Great Britain and the United States on

the north-west coast of America--that of 1818 limiting the joint

occupancy to ten years--that of 1828 extending it indefinitely

until either of the two powers should give notice to the other of

a desire to terminate it. Such agreements are often made when it

is found difficult to agree upon the duration of any particular

privilege, or duty. They are seductive to the negotiators because

they postpone an inconvenient question: they are consolatory to

each party, because each says to itself it can get rid of the

obligation when it pleases--a consolation always delusive to one of

the parties: for the one that has the advantage always resists the

notice, and long baffles it, and often through menaces to consider

it as an unfriendly proceeding. On the other hand, the party to

whom it is disadvantageous often sees danger in change; and if the

notice is to be given in a legislative body, there will always be a

large per centum of easy temperaments who are desirous of avoiding

questions, putting off difficulties, and suffering the evils they

have in preference of flying to those they know not: and in this

way these temporary agreements, to be terminated on the notice of

either party, generally continue longer than either party dreamed of

when they were made. So it was with this Oregon joint occupancy.

The first was for ten years: not being able to agree upon ten years

more, the usual delusive resource was fallen upon: and, under the

second joint occupation had already continued in operation fourteen

years. Western members of Congress now took up the subject, and

moved the Senate to advise the government to give the notice. Mr.

Semple, senator from Illinois, proposed the motion: it was debated

many days--resisted by many speakers: and finally defeated. It was

first resisted as discourteous to Great Britain--then as offensive

to her--then as cause of war on her side--finally, as actual war

on our side--and even as a conspiracy to make war. This latter

accusation was so seriously urged as to call out a serious answer

from one of the senators friendly to the notice, not so much in

exculpation of himself, as that of a friend at whom the imputation

was levelled. In this sense, Mr. Breese, of Illinois, stood up, and

said:

"His friend on the left (Mr. Benton) was accused of being at the

head of a conspiracy, having no other object than the involving

us in a war with Great Britain; and it was said with equal

truth that his lever for moving the different elements was the

northern boundary question. What foundation was there for so

grave an accusation? None other than that he had fearlessly,

from the beginning, resisted every encroachment, come from what

quarter it might. He had stemmed the tide of British influence,

if any such there was--he had rendered great and imperishable

services to the West, and the West was grateful to him--he had

watched her interests from the cradle; and now, when arrived

at maturity, and able to take care of herself, he boldly stood

forth her advocate. If devotion to his country, then, made him a

conspirator, he was indeed guilty."

Upon all this talk of war the commercial interest became seriously

alarmed, and looked upon the delivery of the notice as the signal

for a disastrous depression in our foreign trade. In a word, the

general uneasiness became so great that there was no chance for

doing what we had a right to do, what the safety of our territory

required us to do, and without the right to do which the convention

of 1828 could not have been concluded. The motion for the notice was

defeated by a vote of 28 against 18. The yeas were:

"YEAS--Messrs. Allen, Atchison, Atherton, Bagby, Benton,

Breese, Buchanan, Colquitt, Fairfield, Fulton, Hannegan, King,

Semple, Sevier, Sturgeon, Walker, Woodbury, and Wright--18."

"NAYS--Messrs. Archer, Barrow, Bates, Bayard, Berrien, Choate,

Clayton, Crittenden, Dayton, Evans, Foster, Haywood, Huger,

Huntington, Jarnagin, Johnson, McDuffie, Mangum, Merrick,

Miller, Morehead, Phelps, Rives, Simmons, Tallmadge, Upham,

White, and Woodbridge--28."

Thirty Years' View (Vol. 2 of 2) or, A History of the Working of the American Government for Thirty Years, from 1820 to 1850 · 第 144 / 202 章