Possible Homing Tendencies

Some of the movements of the wolves during the Directional Movements

Phase could in part have resulted from a tendency for the animals to

home, that is to return to their home territory. Packs have been

observed to travel 45 miles (72 km) in 24 hours in Minnesota (Stenlund

1955), Alaska (Burkholder 1959) and on Isle Royale (Mech 1966). In

Minnesota, a radioed wolf was tracked a straight-line distance of 129

miles (208 km) over a 2-month period before being lost by researchers

(Mech and Frenzel 1971), and annual migratory movements of over 200

miles (320 km) have been reported for Canadian wolves (Kuyt 1972).

Therefore it seems within the capabilities of the released wolves to

return the 270-mile (434 km) straight-line distance, or the 340-mile

(547 km) travel distance around Lake Superior to Ray, Minnesota, if the

orientation ability and inclination were present.

Homing tendencies have been reported in wolves and other carnivores. One

of five laboratory-reared wolves returned to her Barrow, Alaska homesite

within about 4 months after a 175-mile (282 km) displacement (Henshaw

and Stephenson 1974). An adult female red fox (_Vulpes vulpes_) returned

to her homesite within 12 days after being displaced 35 miles (56.3 km)

(Phillips and Mech 1970). For black bears there are many records of

apparent homing. Harger (1970) displaced 107 adult black bears from 10.0

to 168.5 miles (16.1 to 270.3 km) with an average displacement of 62.5

miles (100.6 km). Thirty-seven of them homed and 11 others moved long

distances toward home. The longest distance homed was 142.5 miles (229.4

km). The return travel routes seemed direct, with little evidence of

wandering or circling. Harger (1970) concluded that bears could navigate

by some means, as yet undetermined.

There is some indication that the pack of three wolves may have

attempted to return home to Minnesota, although it is possible that

exploration itself also may have produced the movement pattern observed.

If the translocated wolves were to try homing directly toward their

previous territory, they would have had to travel west-northwestward.

However, within a few miles they would have encountered Lake Superior.

The next closest choice would have been to head westward, and this is

what the pack did (Fig. 17). The next possible barrier to their homeward

movements would have been Huron Bay, which would have forced them

southwestward, at least temporarily. Again this is what actually

happened. The pack maintained its southwestward movement beyond Huron

Bay until reaching a point southeast of the next possible barrier,

Keweenaw Bay. They then continued westward south of Keweenaw Bay to the

Prickett Dam area, and veered northwestward to Twin Lakes on March 25.

By this time, the wolves had traveled for 13 days and covered a minimum

distance of 59 miles (94.9 km), and they were 42 miles (67.6 km), closer

to home (16% of the straight-line distance between home and release

site). The directions of the movements of the wolves were consistent

with what they would have to be if the wolves were to return home.

However, after March 25, the directionality in the movements of the pack

ended (Fig. 17), and the animals began what we consider the Exploratory

Phase of their movements. If the wolves actually were homing, perhaps

the tendency diminished as they failed to encounter familiar terrain, or

perhaps they met too many obstacles, or became confused after

encountering too much human activity. Or possibly these factors or the

need to find food and security overcame the homing tendency. As

discussed earlier in relation to the unusual number of times the wolves

were observed, it is clear that they were not moving normally during

this period.

The lone wolf, No. 10, dispersed from the release site in as much of an

opposite direction as it could from the pack (Fig. 20). Thus there is no

evidence that this animal was trying to home. However, it is of interest

to note that the first 32 miles (51.5 km) of her travel was directional

rather than random. Furthermore, when the animal encountered what

probably was a psychological barrier, a high concentration of human

activity along Highway 41, she reversed her movements but still

maintained a directionality by returning to the release area. In fact a

striking pattern of southeast-northwest movements characterized this

wolf's travels for several months after her release, with a gradual

westward drift developing in the southeast-northwest movements (Fig.

20).

Mech and Frenzel (1971) found that a wolf dispersing from his former

home range in Minnesota maintained a general southwestward movement for

a straight-line distance of 129 miles (207.6 km) over a 2-month period,

and Mech (unpublished) has three additional records of dispersing wolves

that maintained directionality for distances of 48 to 130 miles (77.2 to

209.2 km). Storm (1972) followed 12 dispersing red foxes in Iowa,

Illinois, and Minnesota that moved directionally for distances of 12 to

110 miles (19.2 to 176.0 km).

The ability of wolves to orient and navigate even in unfamiliar

surroundings was demonstrated dramatically by the separation of Wolf No.

13 from his two packmates and his later rejoining of them. On May 2 he

was 51 miles (82.1 km) away from them. Five days later he and his

packmates were only 6 miles (9.6 km) apart, in an area 62 miles (99.8

km) from where No. 13 had been on May 2, and 45 miles (72.4 km) from

where his packmates were on that date (Fig. 18 and p. 11).

Because No. 13 had taken such a divergent route from that of No. 11 and

12 upon splitting, and then had met them again at a point so far from

(1) where they had split and (2) where either had gone after the split,

mere backtracking would seem to be ruled out as explanation of how they

were able to rendezvous. Possibly No. 13 backtracked to the separation

point and then followed the others by scent, although this seems

unlikely because of the amount of time that had elapsed. Perhaps a

combination of memory of the general lay of the land, and some

backtracking and eventually howling and the crossing of each group's

fresh tracks could explain this remarkable feat.

An Experimental Translocation of the Eastern Timber Wolf · 第 60 / 72 题