FOOTNOTES

[1] _Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian

Institution for the Year 1882_ [hereinafter referred to as the

_Smithsonian Annual Report_], pp. 101-103; and introductory

"advertisement" to the lectures published by the Smithsonian

Institution in its Miscellaneous Collections (see bibliography).

[2] Dr. J. J. Woodward's lecture explained the progress of medical

knowledge of morbid growth and cancerous tumors from 1865 to 1872.

It cautioned that uncertain methods of diagnosis at that time

allowed charlatans and uneducated practitioners to report cures of

cancer in instances where nonmalignant growths were "removed by

their caustic pastes and plasters."

[3] The two longest intervals were in preparing the last two lectures:

the ninth in 1884, and the tenth, 1889. Both came after the

establishment in 1881 of the Section of Materia Medica in the U.S.

National Museum, to display the development and progress of the

health professions.

[4] _Annual Report of the Secretary of the Navy for the year 1883_,

pp. 190, 614-615.

[5] For classifying chemical compounds, Dr. Flint relied on the work

of H. E. Roscoe and C. Schorlemmez, _A Treatise on Chemistry_, 2

vols. (New York: D. Appleton, 1878-1800.)

[6] _Annual Report of the Secretary of the Navy for the year 1882_,

vol. 2, part 2, pp. 100, 228, 656-657. Dr. Flint in his article

"Report on Pharmacopoeias of All Nations," ibid., pp. 655-680,

remarks that there were then 19 official pharmacopoeias in the

world, besides three semiofficial formularies in certain

localities in Italy. The pharmacopoeias collected represent

Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Holland,

India, Mexico, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland (two),

and the United States.

[7] The _Universal Formulary_, by R. Eglesfeld Griffith, first edited

in March 1850 (3rd ed. rev. and enlarged by John M. Maisch,

Philadelphia: Lea, 1874) should not be considered an international

drug standard. It was mainly concerned with compiling a great

number of formulas and recipes, methods of preparing and

administering official and other medicines, and tables on weights

and measures for utilization by the U.S. practitioners of the

time.

[8] Other elaborate arrangements were also made to improve and expand

the Section's activities and services, though some have never

materialized. For example, a herbarium was suggested from which

specimens could be obtained for display of the actual drug with

painted pictures of its plant next to it. Consideration was given

to displaying enlarged drawings to show the minute structure of

the specimen for better identification. In addition, an exhibition

of several 10-liter vessels of the most popular mineral waters was

planned. The amount of saline substances which analysis had shown

to be present in each vessel was to be listed in a table to be

attached to that vessel, or the same amount of minerals was to be

put in a small bottle beside it. This plan was carried out to the

best advantage at the Cotton States and International Exposition

held in 1895 in Atlanta, Georgia.

[9] HOLT, "A Sketch of the Development of the Rockefeller Institute

for Medical Research," p. 1. A similar comment was voiced by

GALDSTON, "Research in the United States," p. 366.

[10] _Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association_ (1918), vol.

7, pp. 376-377, 466.

[11] Two decades later, Dr. Whitebread designed a panel showing

photographs of famous medical pioneers of all nationalities. See

his article, "The Odd Origin of Medical Discoveries," p. 321.

[12] GEBHARD, "From Medicine Show to Health Museum," p. 579. The

original plan for this Hall of Health was to feature exhibits on

public health for popular educational purposes, including an

illustrated exhibit on hospital care. See FOLEY, "Smithsonian

Institution Devotes Much Space to Hospital Exhibit," pp. 43-44.

[13] Lack of space notwithstanding, valuable accessions were added

about 1930, including a collection of early x-ray tubes and

personal memorabilia of Drs. William T. G. Morton (1819-1868),

Crawford W. Long (1815-1878), and William Gorgas (1854-1920).

[14] D. RILEY MOORE published a series of short reports under the

title "Committee on Osteopathic Exhibits in the U.S. National

Museum," in the _Journal of the American Osteopathic Association_

(1933-1946), vols. 33-46, regarding the exhibit on osteopathy.

[15] [KLEIN], "He Directs Pharmacy Exhibits at the Smithsonian

Institution," pp. 20-21.

[16] Several other journals reported the exhibition with

illustrations: _Drug Topics_ (July 8, 1946), vol. 90, no. 2, pp.

2, 79; _National Capital Pharmacist_ (September 1945), vol. 7, p.

11, and (September 1946), vol. 8, pp. 11-13; and _The Scientific

Monthly_ (November 1952), vol. 75, p. 268.

[17] DODRILL, and others, "Temporary Mechanical Substitution for the

Left Ventricle in Man," pp. 642-644, and "Pulmonary Volvuloplasty

under Direct Vision using the Mechanical Heart for a Complete

Bypass of the Right Heart in a Patient with Congenital Pulmonary

Stenosis," pp. 584-595.

[18] For the design, expert arrangement of the exhibits, and the

legends that accompany each exhibit in the Hall of Health, we are

indebted to Drs. Bruno Gebhard, Richards H. Shryock, Thomas G.

Hull, James Laster, Walle J. H. Nauta, Leslie W. Knott, Theodore

Wiprud, and other physicians, dentists, and scholars who have

offered their advice, assistance, and expert skills.

[19] TAYLOR, "A National Museum of Science, Engineering and Industry,"

p. 359.

[20] NELSON, PELANDER, and KUMPULA, "Hydraulic Turbine, Contra-angle

Handpiece," pp. 324-329.

[21] MONELL, "Dental Skiagraphy," pp. 313-336.

* * * * *

Smithsonian Institution - United States National Museum - Bulletin 240 Contributions From the Museum of History and Technology Papers 34-44 on Science and Technology · 第 265 / 318 题