The Bollman Truss

There had never been any question about the many serious inadequacies of

wood as a bridge material. Decay and fire risk, always present, were the

principal ones, involving continuous expenditure for replacement of

defective members and for fire watches. It was, in fact, understood by

the management and engineering staff of the B. & O. that their timber

bridge superstructures, though considered the finest in the country,

were more or less expedient and were eventually to be replaced. In this

regard it is not surprising that Latrobe, a man of considerable

foresight, had, at an early date, given serious thought to the possible

application of iron here.

[Illustration: Figure 10.--POTOMAC RIVER CROSSING of the Baltimore and

Ohio at North Branch, Maryland, built in 1856. There are three Bollman

deck trusses. (_Photo courtesy of Baltimore and Ohio Railroad._)]

[Illustration: Figure 11.--THE FINK TRUSS. (_Smithsonian photo

41436._)]

[Illustration: WENDEL BOLLMAN'S

Patent Iron Suspension Railroad Bridge.

The undersigned would inform the officers of Railroads and others, that

he is prepared to furnish Drawings and Estimates for Bridges, Roofs,

etc., on the plan of Bollman's Patent.

The performance of these bridges, some of which have been in use for six

years, has given entire satisfaction. Their simplicity of construction

renders repairs easy and cheap, and by a peculiar connection of the Main

and Panel Rods at the bottom of the Posts, all danger from the effects

of expansion, which has heretofore been the chief objection to Iron

Bridges, is entirely removed.

J. H. TEGMEYER,

Baltimore, Md.

Smithsonian Institution - United States National Museum - Bulletin 240 Contributions From the Museum of History and Technology Papers 34-44 on Science and Technology · 第 89 / 318 题