The translations are even more interesting:--

Aliquid nos _de_ Bellicorum Danorum Quomodo Danorum

In diebus antiquis In principio

Popularium regum Populus Regum

Gloriâ accepimus, Gloriam auxerit,

Quomodo tunc principes Quomodo principes

Virtute valuerint. Virtute promoverit.

It will be seen that in these lines Conybeare has at almost every point

the advantage over Thorkelin, and is indeed very nearly in accord with

modern texts and translations. But the poem yet awaited a complete

understanding, for Conybeare could say: ‘The Introduction is occupied by

the praises of Scefing ... and of his son and successor Beowulf. The

embarkation of the former on a piratical expedition is then detailed at

some length. In this expedition (if I rightly understand the text)

himself and his companions were taken or lost at sea’ (p. 35). And, in

general, he misses the same points of the story as Thorkelin, although

he craftily refrains from translating the obscurer passages.

Conybeare apparently knew nothing of the critical work of Grundtvig.

This is not surprising when we remember that _Kjøbenhavns Skilderie_ was

probably not known outside of Denmark[4]. Moreover, it is to be

remembered that Conybeare’s extracts from the _Beowulf_ are not really

later than Grundtvig’s translation, since they were made in the same

year, 1820[5].

_Aim of the Volume, and Nature of the Translations._

From the words quoted above with respect to the collation, it will be

seen that Conybeare in no way regarded his book as a contribution to

Beowulf scholarship. As professor at Oxford, he attempted a literary

presentation of the most beautiful parts of the old poetry. His extracts

are, in general, nothing more than free paraphrases. Wishing to

popularize the _Beowulf_, he used as a medium of translation a

peculiarly stilted kind of blank verse. He dressed the poem out in

elegant phrases in order to hide the barrenness of the original.

Manifestly he feared the roughness, the remoteness of the poem in its

natural state. He feared to offend a nation of readers reveling in the

medievalism of Scott and Byron. A literal Latin translation was inserted

to appease the scholar.

The Translations of Beowulf: A Critical Bibliography · 第 31 / 145 题