[VII‑11] In the estimate of the total Spanish force authors

mainly agree, but the number of cavalry is variously stated,

and even the official letters of Alvarado are contradictory

on this point. Herrera, dec. v. lib. vi. cap. i., gives 500 as

the total, of whom 227 were cavalry. Oviedo, iv. 240, mentions

600, with 240 cavalry. According to a legal investigation made

in Guatemala in 1536 his whole force was 500 and his cavalry

230, _Informacion echa en Santiago Set._ 15, 1536; and this

is the estimate here adopted. Alvarado, _Carta_, _Squier's

MSS._, xix. 1-4, writing to the emperor a few days before his

departure from Puerto de la Posesion, states that he had 450

men including 260 horse, and, a few weeks later, writing from

Puerto Viejo to the governor of Panamá, says that he set sail

from Nicaragua with 500 men of whom 220 were cavalry.

[VII‑12] In _Squier's MSS._, xix. 7-14, is a full account of

Alvarado's report to the emperor, dated May 12, 1535, after

his return from Peru.

[VII‑13] Chap. i., this volume.

[VII‑14] _Informacion contra Alvarado_, in _Pacheco_

and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, x. 152-236. Cuzco lies

slightly to the south of the thirteenth parallel, and was

therefore in the territory assigned to the adelantado;

but it is not probable that he was aware of this fact.

[VII‑15] _Alvarado_, _Carta_, in _Squier's MSS._, xix. 21.

[VII‑16] 'Y asi él se volvió á la cibdad de Mexico sin hacer

cosa ninguna.' _Alvarado_, _Carta_, in _Squier's MSS._, xix.

17. This investigation was attended with some circumstances

difficult of explanation. Maldonado's official proceedings

were anomalous, and were strictly neither those of a visitador

nor a juez de residencia. The king's decree mentioned in the

text enjoined secrecy as to the motives of his visit; yet he

caused the object of his arrival to be publicly cried. The

difference between a visita and residencia is as follows: The

visita could be made at any time by special commission of the

crown, but without suspending, in the exercise of his official

duties, the person whose conduct was to be investigated. The

inquiry was strictly secret, and the visitador had no power to

pass sentence. His duty was to remit the original depositions

to the India Council, by which tribunal judgment was passed.

The residencia, on the other hand, was taken at the expiration

of a person's term of office; the examination was public,

and afforded every opportunity for defence. _Icazbalceta_,

_Col. Doc._, ii. pp. xxviii.-xxx. The secrecy of witnesses

and non-interference with the authority of the person whose

conduct was investigated were not always maintained, however,

in the visita. In that to which Viceroy Mendoza was subjected,

in 1547, his authority was at first disregarded and the names

of witnesses disclosed. _Solórzano_, _Política Indiana_, lib.

v. cap. x. It may be remarked that the chroniclers seem to

have been quite unaware of this first visit of Maldonado in

1535, and only record his arrival in Guatemala as juez de

residencia in 1536. It is, however, fully substantiated by

Alvarado's letter above quoted. For a full explanation of

the term 'residencia,' see _Hist. Cent. Am._, i. 250-1, this

series.

[VIII‑1] See _Hist. Cent. Am._, i. 638, this series.

[VIII‑2] Marroquin was a good Latin scholar and was the first

to apply the system of studying that language to the Indian

dialects. He translated the Catholic catechism into Quiché.

_Vazquez_, _Chronica de Gvat._, 150.

[VIII‑3] _Gonzalez Dávila_, _Teatro Ecles._, i. 142.

Torquemada mentions that Francisco Jimenez, one of the 12

Franciscans who first arrived in New Spain, was appointed

the first bishop of Guatemala, but declined the position 'por

quedar en el estado humilde ... de Fraile Menor,' iii. 445.

Vazquez, quoting a royal cédula dated May 24, 1531, proves

that a bishop had been already appointed at that date. _Chron.

Gvat._, 36-7. According to Remesal, the emperor appointed

Domingo de Betanzos the first bishop, and as he could not be

induced to accept the honor, the mitre was given to Marroquin

at the request of Alvarado. _Hist. Chyapa_, 58-9. In _Nueva

España_, _Breve Res._, MS., ii. 351-76, is a copy of the bull

confirming the bishop's appointment, printed in Spanish and

Latin.

[VIII‑4] Vazquez relates that Fray Toribio Motolinia,

mentioned by Torquemada as the sixth of the first 12

Franciscan missionaries, resided in Guatemala during portions

of 1528 and 1529; but this is extremely doubtful. According

to the former chronicler he preached and baptized at

Quetzaltenango and Patinamit in both years. _Chron. Gvat._,

20-1; but there is conclusive evidence that he was in Mexico

some time during 1528 engaged in violent opposition to the

audiencia. _Santa María_, _Lettre_, in _Ternaux-Compans_,

_Voy._, série ii. tom. v. 92 et seq., and was also there

on the 15th of April 1529 occupied in the same contention.

_Procès-verbal_, in _Id._, 104 et seq. It is not very

probable that, during the interval, he should have made a

journey to Guatemala and as Vazquez claims even to Nicaragua.

Consult also Ramirez, in _Icazbalceta_, _Col. Doc._, i. pp.

xlv.-cliii. According to Torquemada, Toribio was sent to

Guatemala in 1533 to found monasteries. iii. 489.

[VIII‑5] In 1527, according to Gonzalez Dávila, who states

that a hospital was founded at the same time. _Teatro_,

_Ecles._, i. 140. Remesal, who is more to be relied on in

this matter, gives 1529 as the date of Betanzos' arrival in

Santiago, and says that he came at the request of Alvarado on

his return from Spain. _Hist. Chyapa_, 15, 42-5.

[VIII‑6] 'Celebrose su consagracion con ostentissimo aparato,

assi por ser la primera q̃ en Yndias se hazîa, como por la

magnificencia del S. Principe, que le consagrô.' _Vazquez_,

_Chron. Gvat._, 39.

[VIII‑7] Remesal gives a copy of this constitution, which was

signed, 'Episcopvs Gvactemalensis.'

[VIII‑8] _Arévalo_, _Col. Doc. Antig._, 182-5; _Marroquin

al Emperador_, in _Cartas de Indias_, 413-14. The bishop's

signature, in his letters addressed to the emperor from 1537

to 1547, is different in almost every letter. On May 10, 1537,

he signs himself 'Episcopus Sancti Jacobi Huatemalensis;' on

August 15, 1539, 'Episcopus Cuahvtemalensis;' on August 10 and

November 25, 1541, 'Episcopus Cuacvtemolensis;' and on June 4,

1545, and September 20, 1547, 'Episcopus Cuachutemallensis.'

_Cartas de Indias_, 425, 428, 431, 433, 443, 450.

[VIII‑9] The tithes, when paid in kind, were of little value

unless delivered at convenient places. The king, therefore,

issued a cédula ordering that they be taken by the natives to

the mines, or some other suitable place, within a radius of

20 leagues around each town. _Mendoza_, _Carta_, in _Pacheco_

and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, ii. 209; _Florida_, _Col. Doc._,

138.

[VIII‑10] Speaking of the provision, he says: 'Recibiré merced

la reciban con todo amor y voluntad.' _Arévalo_, _Col. Doc.

Antig._, 184.

[VIII‑11] _Arévalo_, _Col. Doc. Antig._, 14.

[VIII‑12] The bishop's humility and pardonable boastfulness

are sometimes a little striking. Speaking of the provision for

the delivery of the tithes, he says: 'Sino se pierde por mis

deméritos, que creo no pierde, pues trabajo mas que los demàs

perlados, que en estas índias al presente residen.' _Id._,

184.

[VIII‑13] During the earlier period of the Spanish conquests

in America this order took no active part. A few individuals,

however, found their way to the new world, among whom was

Bartolomé de Olmedo, who accompanied Cortés to Mexico.

_Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa._, 148.

[VIII‑14] On March 17, 1538, according to _Gonzalez_,

_Dávila_, _Teatro Ecles._, i. 144. Remesal states that the

convent was not formally organized until a year or two later,

and quotes an entry in the books of the cabildo dated the 12th

of August 1538, from which it appears that certain citizens

wished to assist in the building and furnishing of a convent

and church for the use of the order. _Hist. Chyapa_, 148.

There is some doubt as to the exact date.

[VIII‑15] _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 147-9; _Gonzalez Dávila_,

_Teatro Ecles._, i. 144-8; _Escamilla_, _Noticias Curiosas_,

MS., 12; _Iglesias y Conventos de Mex._, 283.

[VIII‑16] _Juarros_, _Guat._, i. 380.

[IX‑1] See _Hist. Cent. Am._, i. 606, this series.

[IX‑2] Salcedo brought with him to Trujillo 209 slaves; of

these 102 were branded in the face. _Testimonio_, _Pacheco_

and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, xiv. 70-7.

[IX‑3] It is stated that Salcedo's death was caused by a sore

on one of his legs, and by the rough treatment received while

imprisoned at Leon; but his friends suspected that he had been

poisoned. _Herrera_, dec. iv. lib. vii. cap. iii.

[IX‑4] The only document which Herrera could produce in

support of his claim was a memorandum without date, signature,

or witness. The appointment of Cereceda, on the other

hand, was signed by Salcedo and attested by 12 witnesses.

_Cerezeda_, _Carta_, in _Squier's MSS._, xx. 3-5. See also

_Oviedo_, iii. 192.

[IX‑5] Diego Mendez had already been waylaid during the night

and severely wounded at the entrance of his house. He would

have been killed had not some of his friends come to his

assistance. _Cerezeda_, _Carta_, in _Squier's MSS._, xx. 4,

5; _Oviedo_, iii. 193.

[IX‑6] It was claimed that a portion of the repartimientos

belonging to the late governor had been unlawfully

appropriated, and was therefore liable to confiscation. Soon

afterward the boy died, and his entire inheritance was divided

among certain of the officials. _Oviedo_, iii. 193.

[IX‑7] Cereceda afterward excused himself by saying that

he had given his consent in order to preserve peace in the

province. 'Consentí que se les diese lo que no les diera

si fuera solo haciendo lo que era razon; hicelo solo por

sosegallos i que no alterasen ó amotonasen la tierra,' in

order to gain time until the king should definitely determine

upon a new governor. _Cerezeda_, _Carta_, in _Squier's MSS._,

xx. 5, 6.

[IX‑8] _Herrera_, dec. iv. lib. vii. cap. iii.

[IX‑9] The morality of the colonists appears to have been

somewhat more lax hereabout than usual. In commenting on

the conduct of Herrera and other officials Cereceda says:

'Tenian ocupadas quatro casas de casados deste pueblo i que

con infamia publica i pesar los maridos los comportavan, sin

yo ser parte á lo remediar con palabras i amenazas, porque lo

demas por el mayor daño se escusava.' _Carta_, in _Squier's

MSS._, xx. 7.

[IX‑10] The certificate was originally taken from Mendez by

the cabildo, and deposited with the Notary Carrasco, who,

being an enemy to Herrera, was easily induced to return it to

its owner. _Cerezeda_, _Carta_, in _Squier's MSS._, xx. 15-18.

See also _Oviedo_, iii. 108.

[IX‑11] 'É ovo regidor que dixo, ó temiendo al Diego Mendez,

ó porque le paresçia ser conviniente á la república, que si no

se pudiesse concertar en que fuesse su teniente Diego Mendez,

que lo fuesse el Cereceda dél, porque esso era lo que convenia

al serviçio de Dios é de Sus Magestades, é al bien é sosiego

de aquella universidad é de la tierra. É porque algunos se

riyeron desto, replicó assi: "Reysos é parésçeos mal lo que he

dicho? Pues asentadlo assi, escribano, que yo lo digo assi."'

_Oviedo_, iii. 203.

[IX‑12] _Cerezeda_, _Carta_, in _Squier's MSS._, xx. 39.

Oviedo, iii. 207, says that only seven were wounded. Herrera,

dec. v. lib. i. cap. x., mentions but four.

[IX‑13] 'Que eran aquel Pedro Vidal, alguacil, que dió la

puñalada al Vasco de Herrera é le echó la soga al cuello, con

la que fué despues ahorcado el malfechor; y el otro Alonso

Vazquez, alcalde é capitan de la guarda del tirano.' _Oviedo_,

iii. 208.

[IX‑14] _Dávila_, _Relacion_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_,

_Col. Doc._, xiv. 114-17. See also _Oviedo_, iii. 213.

[IX‑15] 'Murieron mas de la mitad dellos, assi de los que

servian á los chripstianos en sus haçiendas, como de las

naborias de casa.' _Oviedo_, iii. 213.

[IX‑16] _Cerezeda_, _Carta_, in _Squier's MSS._, xxii. 50;

_Oviedo_, iii. 212. See also _Hist. Mex._, ii., this series.

[IX‑17] Herrera endeavored to persuade Ávila to accompany him,

and proceed in quest of new discoveries. The latter, however,

declined, and on the return of Cereceda was sent on with his

men, by sea, to Yucatan. _Oviedo_, iii. 212-30.

[IX‑18] Oviedo, iii. 213, gives 180 as the number.

[IX‑19] The Quimistan (Quinbistan?), Zolûta, Zelimonga, and

Zulâ Indians returned, but not those of Naco. _Herrera_, dec.

v. lib. ix. cap. viii.

[IX‑20] Distant 23 leagues from Puerto de Caballos, 3 from

Quinbistan, 7 from Naco, and 15 from San Gil de Buenavista.

_Herrera_, dec. v. lib. ix. cap. viii.

[IX‑21] Cereceda was to be 'captain of all the other

captains.' Herrera, dec. v. lib. ix. cap. ix., estimates the

strength of the combined forces at 80 soldiers, but this is

manifestly an error.

[IX‑22] Herrera speaks of her as a native of Seville, and as

having been captured by Cizimba, 'que auia diez años—tenia

por muger,' at the time of the massacre at Puerto de Caballos.

dec. v. lib. ix. cap. ix.

[IX‑23] 'Los que quedaron en la ciudad de Truxillo ...

sinificauan al Rey sus necessidades, suplicauante ... que no

la olvidasse, pues no era menos provechosa que las otras de

las Indias, por las muchas minas que en ella auia: y quanto

al sitio de la Ciudad dezian, que era muy sano, enxuto, y

ayroso, y de muy buenas aguas.... Dezian que no auia vezino

que no tuuiesse en su casa vn huerto con todas las frutas de

Castilla, que se auian podido auer, las quales se dauan muy

bien, como naranjos, cidras, limones agrios y dulces, granados

y higueras, de las quales a siete meses que se plãtan, se

cogia fruta: de melones y vbas, y otras tenian abundancia.'

_Herrera_, dec. v. lib. ix. cap. ix.

[IX‑24] Herrera says that affairs in the province were in

a sad plight, for Cereceda, 'cuya crueldad excedia a toda

humana prudencia,' had lost all control over his men. dec. vi.

lib. i. cap. viii. Montejo, who afterward became governor of

Honduras, also speaks in very disparaging terms of Cereceda.

'All the time he was in Zula and Naco he never moved two

leagues from his abode. Of the 27 or 28 towns in existence

when he reached the country he did not leave a single one. He

destroyed everything, even the cattle and mares. The people

he brought away in irons, leaving some towns without a single

inhabitant. He and his advisers, a priest named Juan Ávila

and a certain Juan Ruano, had laid waste the best portion of

Honduras.' _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, ii. 240-1.

[IX‑25] 'Quisiesse socorrer á los pobladores chripstianos, que

estaban en Honduras, en paçificar la tierra, é dar órden cómo

no se acabassen de perder los españoles que allí estaban.'

_Oviedo_, iii. 214.

[IX‑26] Oviedo, iii. 214, says that this occurred in 1533.

Célis himself states that Cereceda sent him to Guatemala

toward the end of 1535, or early in 1536. _Camino de Guat._,

in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, xiv. 540-9; whereas

Herrera states that Célis went of his own accord. 'Estas cosas

llegaron a termino que el Tesorero como buen ministro sossegô

la gente, con prometer de yr a Guatemala á pedir socorro a

don Pedro de Aluarado.' dec. vi. lib. i. cap. viii.

[IX‑27] _Cava_, _Honduras_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col.

Doc._, xiv. 280 et seq., Célis subsequently put in a claim

for 800 castellanos, for the subsistence of his party, and for

horses employed during the exploration of a road to Guatemala.

On the 24th of October 1539 a judicial investigation was held

before the alcalde mayor, at Puerto de Caballos, to ascertain

whether the treasurer had, as he claimed, discovered a road

thence to Guatemala. Several witnesses were examined, and all

testified that Alonso Ortiz had discovered and travelled over

the road before Célis; that the latter when he passed on to

Guatemala was under no expense whatever, for his supplies were

furnished by others. _Célis_, _Camino_, in _Id._, xiv. 540-50.

In Guatemala he stopped at the house of the king's treasurer,

and was therefore under no expense. _Montejo_, in _Id._, ii.

241.

[IX‑28] There were present, Andrés de Cereceda, the alcalde

Alonso Ortiz, and the regidores Bernardo de Cabranes, Juan

Lopez de Gamboa, and Miguel García de Liñan. _Mendoza_,

_Carta_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, xiv. 301-4.

[IX‑29] _Mendoza_, _Carta_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_,

_Col. Doc._, xiv. 301-4. The foregoing is the account given

in Cereceda's official report to the viceroy of Mexico.

Herrera, however, gives quite a different version of the

matter. He states that the settlers, seeing that, after an

absence of four months, the treasurer Célis did not return or

send any message, agreed to abandon the place. Loading their

Indian servants with what little effects they had left, they

proceeded on their way, after tying Cereceda and two of his

friends to trees, because he forbade them to take away their

slaves on the ground that it was contrary to royal orders to

carry them from one province to another, although he himself

had done so and had allowed his friends the same privilege.

But after marching a few leagues they fell in with men coming

from Guatemala, whereupon they returned to the settlement and

made friends with the governor, dec. vi. lib. i. cap. viii. In

a letter to Alvarado dated May 9, 1536, Cereceda says nothing

about being tied to a tree, although he complains of gross

ill-treatment at the hands of the colonists.

[IX‑30] It was intended to establish here a large settlement.

The city was founded on the 26th of June 1536. The various

officials were appointed, sworn, and inducted into office.

Sites for dwellings were assigned to the alcaldes, regidores,

and vecinos. The name of the town was not to be changed except

by the emperor's orders; and it was decreed that none should

reside elsewhere until the emperor's pleasure was known.

_Honduras_, _Fundacion_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col.

Doc._, xvi. 530-8.

[IX‑31] This settlement was distant from Comayagua 38 leagues

and from Guatemala 106 leagues. _Juarros_, _Guat._, i. 41;

_Herrera_, dec. vi. lib. i. cap. viii.

[IX‑32] _Alvarado_, _Carta_, in _Squier's MSS._, xix. 24-5,

29. In this letter he proposes to the king to conduct a large

expedition from Spain through the Straits of Magellan into

the South Sea, in which he believed there were many islands

and even some continents.

[X‑1] 'A quien se auia dado el oficio de contador, y

depuestole del de alcalde mayor, por las diferẽcias que traía

con Pedrarias.' _Herrera_, dec. iv. lib. ix. cap. xv. Oviedo,

iv. 112, still speaks of him as 'alcalde mayor é contador'

when he takes charge of the government.

[X‑2] 'Que era de derecho, que quando dos personas que tenian

poderes del Rey, moria el vno, el que quedaua sucedia al

otro.' _Herrera_, dec. iv. lib. ix. cap. xv.

[X‑3] Herrera and Oviedo both state that after the death of

Pedrarias 'quedó en el cargo de la gobernaçion el licenciado

Françisco de Castañeda,' whereas Andagoya, _Nar._, 39, says

that 'the Bishop Diego Alvarez Osorio succeeded Pedrarias as

governor, but died a short time after he had assumed office,

leaving Castañeda as his successor.' This is undoubtedly an

error. The editors of _Datos Biog._, in _Cartas de Indias_,

710, give as the date of Osorio's death the year 1534, which

is also erroneous. His decease occurred in 1536. See _Las

Casas_, _Informacion_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col.

Doc._, vii. 127.

[X‑4] In a few days Castañeda had appropriated eight of them.

_Herrera_, dec. iv. lib. ix. cap. xv.

[X‑5] 'No podia dexar de auer fraude, pues los auia dado a

menosprecio, por contemplaciones, y por cõseguir sus fines.'

_Herrera_, dec. iv. lib. ix. cap. xv.

[X‑6] 'El qual se dió todo el recabdo quél pudo á

enriquesçerse; é púdolo bien hacer, pues no le quedó quien le

fuesse á la mano.' _Oviedo_, iv. 112.

[X‑7] Among those who left the province were Sebastian de

Benalcázar and Juan Fernandez, who joined Pizarro on the

Isthmus in March 1531. In their company went Francisco

Bobadilla, Juan de las Varillas, and Gerónimo Pontevedra,

friars of the order of Mercy, who figured in the conquest of

Guatemala and Nicaragua. _Navarro_, _Relacion_, in _Col. Doc.

Inéd._, xxvi. 238.

[X‑8] During the brief rule of Salcedo in Nicaragua, one

Maestro Rojas, a patron of the church, imprisoned the

ex-treasurer Castillo on a charge of heresy, but the former

held no jurisdiction in the case, and Rojas remained in

confinement until the arrival of Pedrarias, accompanied by

Fray Francisco de Bobadilla, who was vested with the requisite

authority by the bishop of Panamá. His power was transferred

to the bachiller Pedro Bravo, and from him to Pedrarias,

who tried the case, acquitted Castillo, and restored him to

office. _Squier's MSS._, iv.

[X‑9] _Hist. Chyapa_, 105. It appears that he was not a friar,

being spoken of as 'muy magnífico é muy reverendo señor D.

Diego Alvarez Osorio.' _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._,

vii. 116; see also _Alcedo_, iii. 322, who adds that he was

a native of America, though of what place is unknown; and

_Gonzalez Dávila_, _Teatro Ecles._, i. 235; _Juarros_, _Hist.

Guat._, i. 49.

[X‑10] New tithes were to be levied on cocoa, honey, wax,

and flax, to provide for the salary of the bishop, which was

500,000 maravedís, and the limits of the new diocese were

to be determined 'y estavan bien servidas las iglesias.'

_Squier's MSS._, xxii. 109.

[X‑11] For previous mention of Las Casas see _Hist. Cent.

Am._, i. 277-9, 284, 309.

[X‑12] 'En tanto, desde que Rodrigo de Contreras fué á aquella

tierra estuvo exerçitando su offiçio, como buen gobernador, é

tuvo en paz é buena justiçia aquellas tierras é provinçias,

que por Su Majestad le fueron encomendadas, é procurando

la conversion é buen tractamiento de los indios para que

viniessen á conosçer á Dios.' _Oviedo_, iv. 113.

[X‑13] A provision was ratified by the emperor on the 20th of

April 1537, and contained also permission to make the conquest

of the islands in lakes Nicaragua and Managua. _Pacheco_ and

_Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, xxii. 515-34.

[X‑14] Before the flight of Castañeda Las Casas visited

Española whither he was summoned to negotiate a treaty with

the powerful chief Enrique. He returned once more to Realejo,

and soon afterward attempted a second voyage to Peru, but was

driven back to port by stress of weather.

[X‑15] See the lengthy deposition taken in Leon by request of

the governor before Bishop Osorio, and concluded after the

prelate's death, before the lieutenant-governor and alcalde

mayor licenciado Gregorio de Zeballos and the notary Martin

Mimbreño. Many witnesses here testify to the persistent

opposition of Las Casas, who was requested to accompany the

expedition, but refused, though he offered to go in command

of 50 soldiers, to explore and make a peaceful conquest of

the territory in question. _Las Casas_, _Informacion_, in

_Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, vii. 116-46.

[X‑16] 'El Gouernador recibia informaciones, para prouar que

el padre escandalizaua la gente, y alteraua la Prouincia.'

_Herrera_, dec. vi. lib. i. cap. viii.

[X‑17] Notwithstanding the controversy with Las Casas, the

people of Leon, and even Contreras himself, were unwilling

to see their convent deserted. In the depositions already

mentioned witnesses testify on the 23d of August 1536 that

'dos meses, poco mas ó menos tiempo, que fue antes que los

dichos frailes dominicos se fuesen del monasterio de Sant

Francisco desta cibdad.' Las Casas and his companions were

asked to remain by the regidores 'e otras muchas personas

desta cibdad,' who made their request on behalf of the

governor. They refused, however, and departed the same day.

_Las Casas_, _Informacion_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col.

Doc._, vii. 116-46. It is evident that this event occurred

about the month of June 1536. Remesal, who is not generally

over-exact in dates, says that Las Casas arrived in Guatemala

'casi al fin del año de treynta y cinco.' _Hist. Chyapa_, 111.

Why Helps, in his _Life of Las Casas_, 185, without venturing

to give a correct date himself, should boldly assert 'Herrera

makes him go to Spain, and though he gives a wrong date (1536)

for this, yet the main statement may be true,' I am at a loss

to explain.

[X‑18] 'En medio dessa laguna ó metal saltan ó revientan

dos borbollones ó manaderos muy grandes de aquel metal

continuamente, sin ningun punto cessar, é siempre está el

metal ó licor allí colorado é descubierto, sin escorias.'

On one occasion the lava rose to the top, creating such

intense heat that within a league or more of the volcano all

vegetation was destroyed. _Oviedo_, iv. 81-2.

[X‑19] Oviedo was of the opinion that she must have been the

devil; but whether the consort of his Satanic Majesty or the

devil himself in female form he does not say. 'É segund en

sus pinturas usan pintar al diablo, ques tan feo é tan lleno

de colas é cuernos é bocas é otras visages, como nuestros

pintores lo suelen pintar á los piés del arcángel Sanct Miguel

ó del apóstol Sanct Bartolomé.' _Oviedo_, iv. 75.

[X‑20] 'É que antes ó despues un dia ó dos que aquesto se

hiçiesse, echaban allí en sacrifiçio un hombre ó dos ó más é

algunas mugeres é muchachos é muchachas; é aquellos que assi

sacrificaban, yban de grado á tal suplicio.' _Oviedo_, iv. 74.

[X‑21] 'Callad, padre: que por ventura Dios no quiere que

lo descubran capitanes ni personas ricas, sino pobres é

humillados.' _Oviedo_, iv. 77.

[X‑22] 'É porque faltaba un cabrestante é no lo mandaban

haçer por no ser descubiertos, el frayle lo hiço por su mano

en el lugar ques dicho que estaban todos los otros aparejos.'

_Oviedo_, iv. 78.

[X‑23] Two unsuccessful attempts were made before this

date, and some of the friar's associates, terrified by their

first glimpse of the burning lake, abandoned the enterprise.

_Oviedo_, iv. 78.

[X‑24] In 1529, during his residence in Nicaragua, Oviedo was

the guest of Machuca, and speaks favorably of his conduct. In

company with his host and the cacique Lenderi the chronicler

explored a volcano, near the Masaya, in the crater of which

was a warm-water lake, at about the same level as the lava

which excited the cupidity of Fray Blas. The descent was

difficult, but Indian women managed to pass up and down in

obtaining water. With regard to the depth of the lake Oviedo

remarks: 'Este lago, á mi paresçer (é assi lo juzgan otros)

está en el pesso é hondura que está el fuego que dixe en el

poço del monte de Massaya ... no le hallan suelo por su mucha

hondura.' Machuca, assisted by his friends, furnished the

funds needed for exploring the Desaguadero.

[X‑25] The principal rapids in the stream still bear the name

of Machuca. _Squier's Nicaragua_ (ed. 1856), i. 82.

[X‑26] Mention is made of this expedition by Estrada Rávago,

whose narrative of the affairs of the province, written in

1572, appears in _Squier's MSS._, xiii. 4.

[X‑27] According to Oviedo, Garavito must have made friends

with Contreras, for speaking of the former he says that one

day, while engaged in a game of 'cañas' in the city of Leon,

he suddenly fell dead from his horse. He was one of those

who took part in the enterprise which cost Vasco Nuñez de

Balboa his life, and betrayed him to Pedrarias, for which

act of treachery his own life was spared. _Oviedo_, iv. 58-9.

According to Rávago, Garavito's men, after the death of their

commander, sailed for Peru on their own responsibility.

[X‑28] He held office for eleven years as treasurer, and

during all that time it is said that he put nothing into the

treasury. _Squier's MSS._, xxii. 144, 149. It may be remarked,

on the other hand, that the affairs of the province were in

such a condition that little or no revenue could be collected.

There is no evidence that Rios was related to his namesake,

the former governor of Castilla del Oro.

[X‑29] It is somewhat remarkable that the dean of a church

could imprison a royal treasurer, but such is the fact. 'Le

vino a prender ... pidió favor a la Ciudad de Granada donde

el estava (Rios), lo prendió i metió en el monasterio de la

Merced por ser casa de piedra.' ... _Squier's MSS._, xxii.

144.

[X‑30] On May 20, 1545, he wrote from his prison to the

emperor: 'Dos años que estoi preso, i mis bienes sin cuenta

en manos de mis adversarios. Ha 6 meses que me pusieron en

esta carcel arzobispal,' and asked to be tried at once, and

punished or acquitted as the case might be. _Squier's MSS._,

xxii. 148.

[X‑31] It is probable that Rios continued to govern until the

return of Contreras. Soon after the events just described

he lost his life, probably during some expedition into the

interior, as nothing is said of him until July 15, 1545, when

bishop Valdivieso in one of his letters to the king, says: 'I

asi han muerto Po. de los Rios, Luis de Guevara, i otros de menos

cuenta.' In a subsequent report this prelate again refers to 'al

difto. Teso. Po. de los Rios,' stating that the tithes collected,

and still due by him at his death, had not been recovered.

_Squier's MSS._, xxii. 109-10.

[X‑32] One Pedro García, in a communication to the

emperor, dated Leon, January 10, 1545, complains that

'la ra de Contreras, Rios i su teniente Luis de Guevara

hecha por el Lic. Herrera, ha sido sepultada i sin

fruto.' _Squier's MSS._, xxii. 145; and when certain

malecontents afterward demanded that Herrera be sent back

to Leon to finish his investigation, the answer came from

the audiencia 'que no habia lugar quel dicho Licenciado

volviese á esta tierra.' _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col.

Doc._, vii. 571.

[X‑33] _Dávila_, _Teatro Ecles._, i. 235. Valdivieso was a

native of Villahermosa, and the son of Antonio de Valdivieso

and Catalina Álvarez Calvento. He became a Dominican in the

convent of San Pablo, Búrgos, of which he was an inmate when

the emperor called him to the bishopric of Nicaragua. _Datos

Biog._, in _Cartas de Indias_, 857, and _Col. Doc. Inéd._,

i. 117; _Herrera_, dec. vii. lib. vi. cap. vi., states

that he was made bishop 'por muerte del obispo Mendauia,'

referring to dean Mendavia, but Rios would not have dared to

send him a prisoner to Spain had he been a bishop. To whom

Valdivieso refers when, while speaking of himself as being

the second bishop concentrated in Nicaragua, he remarks: 'Fue

el lo. antecesor que murió a 40 dias que llegó a la tierra,'

_Squier's MSS._, xxii. 125, it is impossible to determine.

The first bishop, Osorio, was appointed in 1531, and died in

1536. That another prelate was chosen before Valdivieso is

nowhere recorded. It is probable, however, that he alludes to

Fray Juan de Arteaga, bishop elect for Chiapas, who, when Las

Casas first refused that appointment, left Spain on February

15, 1541, and died at Puebla the same year, soon after his

arrival. _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 202.

[X‑34] 'Inquisicion no se ha de mentar en esta tierra, i

en entrando en ella me embiaron a decir que si entendia en

cosa de Inquisicion o lo pensava, me darian de puñaladas.'

_Squier's MSS._, xxii. 146. On another occasion, when

President Maldonado and the oidor Ramirez were at Granada

preparing an expedition to Peru, the bishop refused to

officiate in church because a person was present whom he had

excommunicated. Hereupon Ramirez used insulting language,

causing him to retire from the church. Valdivieso's conduct

caused such ill-feeling that a mob afterward assembled in the

street and threatened to hang him.

[X‑35] The following quotation is from a report of the

audiencia at Gracias á Dios, dated December 30, 1545. 'Los

Dominicos de Nicaragua tenian un pueblo que se les mando

quitar por las Ordenanzas. Representaronnos que sin el no

podrian estar, i porque no se ausentasen se lo dejamos. Tendrá

el pueblo 20 Indios.' _Squier's MSS._, xxii. 131.

[X‑36] 'Y el Fiscal auia puesto acusacion contra Rodrigo de

Contreras, porque siendo gouernador de aquella provincia,

salio diuersas vezes de su Gouernacion con gente de pie y de

cauallo, y fue a la parte de Costa rica, y al desaguadero, y

otras tierras comarcanas, adonde hizo grandes excessos, assi

contra Castellanos, como contra Indios.' _Herrera_, dec. vii.

lib. vi. cap. vi.

[X‑37] Dated at Gracias á Dios, December 24, 1545. _Squier's

MSS._, xxii. 126.

[X‑38] Herrera was actuated merely by selfish motives. He

desired for himself the office of ruler, and it was fortunate

for the province that he did not obtain it; for when in 1548

his residencia was taken by the licentiate Cerrato he was

proved to have been the most rapacious of all his colleagues.

[X‑39] Report, dated Granada, April 23, 1547. _Squier's MSS._,

xxii. 46.

[X‑40] The laws were published in Nicaragua in 1545.

[X‑41] This report was dated Leon, February 10, 1548. The

principal accusations contained therein are mere repetitions

of those already mentioned. See _Squier's MSS._, xxii. 98-100.

[X‑42] He probably remained in Spain till 1554, as nothing

further is recorded of him until that year, when we hear

of him as serving in Peru. He finally appears in the act of

swearing allegiance to Philip II. in Lima on the 25th of July

1557. _Datos Biog._, in _Cartas de Indias_, 742.

[X‑43] This convent was subsequently occupied by Dominicans,

as the Flemish friars abandoned it in 1531, travelling in

company with Fray Marcos de Niza to Costa Rica, Peru, Tierra

Firme, Española, and Mexico. _Vazquez_, _Chron. Gvat._, 21-2.

Juan de Gandabo, a Franciscan friar, and one of the first that

came to Nicaragua, was still in Granada in 1536, where he

labored in company with Fray Francisco de Aragon. The place

and date of his death are unknown. _Notas, Datos Biog._, in

_Cartas de Indias_, 762.

[X‑44] _Gonzalez Dávila_, in _Teatro Ecles._, i. 233.

[X‑45] In the province of Oxomorio Bobadilla baptized 85;

in Diria, 5,018; in Mombacho, 3,241; in Masaya, 937; in

Malapalte, 154; in Marinalte, 409; in Lenderi, 2,917; in

Managua, 1,116; in Matiari, 421; in Mavitiatomo, 75; in

Nagrando, Ariat, Mabitra, and Mahometombo, 585; in Maribio,

6,346; in Zecoteaga, 2,169. 'É assi paresceme á mí que para

esta creencia desta gente nuevamente allegada á la iglesia,

que es más menester de baptiçarlos é dexarlos, pues que sin

creer, como lo dice la mesma verdad evangélica, no se pueden

salvar, sino condenar.' _Oviedo_, iv. 59-60.

[X‑46] During their journey they discovered a river which they

named Nuestra Señora. _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._,

iii. 511-13.

[X‑47] The time of their arrival is given as 1550.

_Bienvenida_, _Lettre_, in _Ternaux-Compans_, _Voy._, série

i. tom. x. 308.

[X‑48] Named Tabizgalpa by Arias Gonzalo Dávila, who

accompanied the expedition.

[X‑49] In this chapter there have been consulted various

documents in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, i. 556,

563; iii. 84-8, 511-13; vii. 116-46; _Cartas de Indias_, 710,

762, 775; _Datos Biog._, in _Cartas de Indias_, 36, 742, 857;

_Col. Doc. Inéd._, xxvi. 238; xlix. 21-3; l. 116; _Squier's

MSS._, xiii. 3, 4; xxii. 34-149; _Oviedo_, iii. 176-9; iv.

76-92, 112-15; _Herrera_, dec. iv. lib. i. cap. ix.; lib.

ix. cap. xv.; lib. x. cap. v.; dec. v. lib. vii. cap. ii.;

dec. vi. lib. i. cap. viii.; dec. vii. lib. vi. cap. v.; dec.

viii. lib. i. cap. ix.; _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 105-7,

193-9, 203-6; _Andagoya_, _Nar._, 39; _Vega_, _Hist. Descub.

Am._, ii. 244-6; _Gonzalez Dávila_, _Teatro Ecles._, i. 234-5;

_Cogollvdo_, _Hist. Yucathan_, 345; _Vazquez_, _Chron. Gvat._,

252; _Juarros_, _Guat._, i. 49; _Morelli_, _Fasti Novi Orbis_,

112; _Benzoni_, _Hist. Mondo Nvovo_, 105; _Pelaez_, _Mem.

Guat._, i. 135; _Pineda_, in _Soc. Mex. Geog._, iii. 347;

_Kerr's Col. Voy._, v. 175; _Levy's Nic._, 67-73; _Squier's

States Cent. Am._, i. 82.

[XI‑1] It is claimed by some chroniclers that, in the time

of Columbus, this portion of the mainland was already known

by the name of Costa Rica on account of the fine specimens

of gold discovered, principally in the Talamanca district,

where it abounded in streams and was obtained with little

labor. _Molina_, _Bosquejo Costa R._, 79; this author follows

Navarrete. See also _Bejarano_, _Informe_, MS. Morel de Sta.

Cruz, _Visita Apost._, MS., 14, on the other hand attributes

the name to the rich pearl-fisheries which were found on

the coast and to the quality of the fruits, woods, and other

products of the territory.

[XI‑2] _Hist. Cent. Am._, i. 484-5, this series.

[XI‑3] I am inclined to believe that the original founders of

Cartago were settlers from the colony established by Francisco

Hernandez de Córdoba at Brusélas, on the gulf of Nicoya in

1524, and abandoned three years later by order of Salcedo (see

_Hist. Cent. Am._, i. 512, this series); more particularly

as its first site was known to have been close to the harbor

of Caldera, and therefore not far from the landing-place of

Córdoba. It was next removed to a spot near the Rio Taras,

and thence to its present location. It is even claimed by

some that Cartago was the first city established in what was

formerly called the kingdom of Guatemala. Juarros makes this

statement, basing his assertion on a report made in 1744 by

José de Mier y Ceballos to the engineer Luis Diez Navarro.

Referring to the same document he continues: 'It appears by an

edict preserved among the records, that the first governor and

captain general of Costa Rica was Diego de Astieda Chirinos.'

_Hist. Guat._ (ed. London, 1823), 75, 341-2. These statements

are repeated in _Mosquito_, _Doc._, 27, where the governor

is called Ostiega. See also _Salv._, _Diar. Ofic._, 30 Mar.

1876, 168. Molina, the modern historian of Costa Rica, follows

Juarros and goes even further when he says: 'Mais il est

probable que sa fondation eut lieu pendant le quatrième voyage

de Colomb, en 1502 ... en 1522, Cartago, l'ancienne capitale

espagnole de la province, était une ville d'assez d'importance

pour demander qu'on voulût bien y fixer la résidence d'un

gouverneur avec son secrétaire. Diego de Astieda Chirinos

paraît avoir été son premier gouverneur.' ... _Coup d'Oeil

de Costa R._ (ed. Paris, 1849), 4. That the above authors are

in error is proved by the fact that Diego de Artiega Cherino

(as his name should properly be written) was not appointed

governor and captain general of Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and

Nicoya till 51 years later, namely, in 1575. _Pacheco_ and

_Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, xvii. 559-65. Molina, in a subsequent

work, also inclines to the belief that Cartago was founded by

those who abandoned the earlier settlements, and corrects his

former statement in regard to Columbus, merely saying: 'El

immortal Colon mismo en su cuarto viaje en el año de 1502,

tocó en varios puntos de su costa en el Atlántico.' _Bosquejo

Costa R._, 10. It is singular that Molina, in his treatise on

the boundary question between Costa Rica and Nicaragua, should

not have referred to the document mentioned by Juarros, and

that he should have failed to use it in his _Mem. Costa R.

and Nic._ In _Herrera_, dec. vii. lib. iv. cap. xvii., the

date of the founding of Cartago is even removed to the time

of Gutierrez, which may be correct, inasmuch as he first gave

to the province the name of Nueva Cartago.

[XI‑4] The first boundaries appointed for the province are

those mentioned in the charter granted to Gutierrez, dated

Madrid, November 29, 1540, wherein they are described as

'extending from sea to sea, and from the frontier of Veragua,

running to the westward to the great river (Rio Grande),

provided that the coast adjoining said river on the side of

Honduras should remain under the government of Honduras, with

power to Gutierrez to conquer and settle any island in said

river which should not be previously located by Spaniards; and

the right to the navigation, fisheries, and other advantages

of said river; and provided that he (Gutierrez) should not

approach to within 15 leagues of the Lake of Nicaragua,

because this territory of 15 leagues being reserved, as

well as said lake, were to remain in the possession of the

government of Nicaragua; but the navigation and fisheries

both in that part of the river granted to Gutierrez and in

the 15 leagues reserved, and in the lake, should be possessed

in common, conjointly with the inhabitants of Nicaragua.'

_Molina_, _Costa R. and Nic._, 7. The author claims to possess

a certified copy of unpublished documents stored in the

archives of Spain, in which he states the conditions of the

charter granted to Gutierrez. See also _Oviedo_, iii. 179,

and _Levy's Nic._, 67-73.

[XI‑5] It is stated by some chroniclers that Contreras

promised to furnish men and provisions on condition that he

be allowed a share of the spoils.

[XI‑6] 'A queste parole, rispose Diego Gottieres, che

l'Imperatore gli haueua dato quella Gouernatione perche

la populasse, e non perche la rubasse, e se à gli altri la

fortuna era stata contraria, che haueua speranza in Dio che

à lui gli saria propitia, e che in modo alcuno no voleua

lasciare la impresa, né manco voleua compagnia alcuna.'

_Benzoni_, _Hist. Mondo Nvovo_, 83.

[XI‑7] Spelled also Suere. _Benzoni_, _Mondo Nvovo_, 85.

[XI‑8] 'E despues que allí estuvo un año ó más, porque

faltaron los bastimentos, se le amotinó la gente é se le

tornaron á Nicaragua; é este gobernador se quedó con seys

hombres solos.... Pero aunque este gobernador estaba solo é

con tan pocos chripstianos ... no dexaban los indios naturales

de les dar de comer é oro, sin haçer mal ni daño á ninguno de

los nuestros.' _Oviedo_, iii. 180.

[XI‑9] 'E cosi fece vintisette soldati, e trouandomi io in

questa Città volsi esser vno di que gli, ancora ch'io fussi

ripreso da vno Spagnuolo antiano, ilquale era andato nella

prouincia di Cartagena, e santa Marta, e altri luoghi, per

ispatio di quindici anni, dicendomi, che in modo alcuno, mi

lasciassi vincere di andare à tale impresa, e che non volesse

dar credito alcuno alle parole del Capitano. _Benzoni_, _Mondo

Nvovo_, 84-5.

[XI‑10] Oviedo names the two caciques Cama and Coco: 'E cada

dia traian oro al gobernador, el qual, como hombre de ninguna

espiriençia, prendió á uno de aquellos caçiques, que estaban

de paz, que se deçia el Cama (el qual era muy rico), porque

no le daba tanto oro como este gobernador le pedia.' iii. 180.

[XI‑11] 'Ia Gottierez dreigde Camachiren te verbranden; hoewel

nu bereeds verscheiden stukken gouds, met allerlei beesten,

tijgers, visschen, vogelen konstig geboetseert, die de prijs

van twee tonnen gouds ophaelden, door de selve begiftigt was.

Sulk een schenkaedje scheen te gering. Hy bragt den gevangene

by een kist: en swoer, hy soude hem langsaem braeden, ten zy

binnen vier dagen ses mael meer goud verschafte als de kist

laeden konde.' _Montanus_, _Nieuwe Weereld_, 87.

[XI‑12] 'Et cosi partissimo, e à pena che fussimo saliti

dalle case, io indiuinai quello c'haueua da essere di noi

altri, dicendo à vno Spagnuolo, noi andiamo alla beccheria;

e rispondendomi lui queste parole disse. Tu sei vno di

quegli, che gli vogliamo far guadagnare vn Prencipato al suo

dispetto.' _Benzoni_, _Mondo Nvovo_, 89.

[XI‑13] This degradation so affected Cocori that he shed tears

and promised, if he were liberated, to bring the governor a

quantity of gold. 'Et essendo poi tutti noi altri in punto

per marciare, e vedendo il Cacique come il Gouernatore per

dispregio lo voleua menare con lui carico, e con altri suoi

Indiani, con parte delle sue bagaglie; si attristò in tal

maniera, che si messe à piangere, come vn putto; e gli disse,

che se voleua dargli libertà, che in termine di quattro

giorni, gli darebbe vna buona somma d'oro.' _Benzoni_, _Mondo

Nvovo_, 89. But his promise availed him nothing.

[XI‑14] Benzoni relates that being unable to eat his portion

of dog-meat which was full of worms, he went to the governor

and demanded food. Diego told him to go and eat of the

roots of trees, whereupon a Spaniard who was standing near

exclaimed, 'Sir governor, since you will not share the good

and the bad with us, go and make war by yourself.' A piece

of cheese weighing three pounds was then divided among the

men, who were thus pacified for that night. The chronicler

was on sentry during the early morning-watch, and hearing

the governor give orders to his cook to boil a piece of pork

for his breakfast paced to and fro near the fire till every

one was asleep, when, sharpening a piece of wood to a point,

he speared the pork and secured the prize in his knapsack,

'feeling better pleased,' he tells us, 'than if he had secured

a treasure.' _Hist. New World_, in _Hakluyt_, _Divers Voy._,

132.

[XI‑15] The Rio Grande.

[XI‑16] 'Et hauendo combattuto dall' vna parte, e dall'

altra per ispatio di mezo quarto d'hora, e hauendo noi altri

ammazzato, e ferito molti Indiani, e alla fine fattogli

voltare le spalle.' _Benzoni_, _Hist. Mondo Nuovo_, 91.

Montanus states that the entire battle lasted half an hour.

'Na een half uur vechten, deinsden d'aenvallers; doch, met

versche benden gestijft, hervatten den torn: braeken tuschen

de Spaensche slag-orde in: sloegen met palm-houte swaerden

en knodsen harsenen en beenen te pletteren.' _Die Nieuwe

Weereld_, 88.

[XI‑17] Oviedo says the governor was sick with gout at the

time. 'Y el gobernador en essa saçon mandaba mal su persona,

porque andaba tullido de gota é quatro negros le traian echado

en una hamaca, lo qual le debiera bastar para ser mas paçiente

con los indios.' His statements differ materially from those

of Benzoni. He relates that the Spaniards were surprised in

their camp and that Gutierrez and 72 of his men were slain,

seven only making their escape, but it is not probable that

he had so large a force under his command. iii. 181. Rávago,

in _Squier's MSS._, xiii. 3, says that only 44 or 45 days

elapsed between the landing of Gutierrez and his death, but

his report concerning the early history of the province is

somewhat vague and unreliable.

[XI‑18] There is little doubt that Benzoni's narrative of the

expedition of Gutierrez is somewhat colored in consequence

of a rupture between himself and the governor. 'The first day

that we entered the port,' he says, 'the governor graciously

placed me at his table, and took pleasure in conversing with

me. The greater part of his conversation was about gold and

silver, and the wars, and the cruelties inflicted on wretched

Italy, and especially on Milan. But when he perceived that

such subjects were disagreeable to me, he took a dislike to me

and never would bear the sight of me after.' It is, however,

the only complete record of that event, and I can but give his

version of it. Oviedo's information as to the early history

of Costa Rica is taken from Juan de Espinosa, who accompanied

Alonso de Pisa to Cartago in one of his return voyages. iii.

184. He was well acquainted with Gutierrez, and thus tries to

palliate his faults: 'Desalmados ó pláticos que por acá han

andado, que á los noviçios ó nuevamente venidos á gobernar los

enseñen á robar;' and in consequence thereof 'por enriquesçer,

presto vuelven la hoja, é trocado el intento con que partieron

de España, si bueno era, ó afirmado en el cauteloso que en su

pecho estaba callado, en poco tiempo manifiestan las obras el

contrario de las palabras.' iii. 178.

Other authorities quoted in this chapter are _Herrera_, dec.

vii. lib. iv. cap. xvii.; _Benzoni_, _Mondo Nvovo_, lib. ii.

83-92; _Bejarano_, _Informe_; _Haya_, _Informe_; _Squier's

MSS._, xiii. 1-3; _Juarros_, _Guat._ (ed. London, 1823),

73-6, 341-5; _Molina_, _Coup d'Oeil de Costa R._, 4; _Molina_,

_Bosquejo Costa R._, 10, 83-92; _Molina_, _Costa R. and Nic._,

6-8, 36-8; _Mosquito Doc. 27_, in 77-229; _Morel de Sta Cruz_,

_Visita Apost._, MS., 14; _Reichardt_, _Cent. Am._, 111, 112;

_Salv._, _Diar. Ofic. 30 Mar. 1876_, 618.

The time of Diego Gutierrez' fight with the Indians and

death, as given by Oviedo, is contradicted in an official

manuscript extant that places it in December 1544. It is the

investigation made in Leon, Nicaragua, on the 25th of June,

1545, and the writer assures us he has an authenticated copy

of it. Peralta's autograph note in _Peralta_, _Rio San Juan_,

9.

[XII‑1] _Arévalo_, _Col. Doc. Antig._, 13. The law was

soon modified by decrees of Feb. 12, 1538, and of June

29 and November 8, 1539, by which prelates and governors

were directed to induce all eligible unmarried men holding

encomiendas to marry within three years. This, however, was

to be accomplished by persuasive means, or by distinguishing

in favor of the married men in the distribution of Indians,

and not by coercive measures, _Recop. de Indias_, ii. 271-2.

[XII‑2] 'Y otros que aunque haya mugeres en la tierra, y ellos

estén en edad que todavia se sufra casarse, no las querrán por

las enfermedades contagiosas que de la tierra se han pegado.'

_Arévalo_, _Col. Doc. Antig._, 14.

[XII‑3] _Commentarios Reales_, ii. 58.

[XII‑4] _Vazquez_, _Chronica de Gvat._, 158-9; _Bernal Diaz_,

_Hist. Verdad._, 235; _Herrera_, dec. vii. lib. ii. cap. x.

[XII‑5] 'Y que asimismo descubriese, por la costa de esta

Nueva España que llaman de la mar del Sur á la parte del

norte, con dos navios.' _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._,

iii. 507. See also _Oviedo_, iv. 23.

[XII‑6] _Vazquez_, _Chronica de Gvat._, 158-9.

[XII‑7] No greater proof could exist of the high favor in

which Alvarado stood at court than the arrangement of this

second marriage. The lady being the sister of his former

wife, a special dispensation of the pope was required to

legalize the marriage; and through the influence of Cobos

and the power of the emperor a bull was granted. Such an

authorization was rarely obtained. _Oviedo_, iii. 214-15;

_Alvarado_, _Carta_, in _Arévalo_, _Col. Doc. Antig._, 179;

_Gavarrete_, _Copias de Doc._, MS., 43-4; _Gomara_, _Hist.

Ind._, 269; _Torquemada_, i. 323. Remesal, who is in error as

to the date of this marriage, has this remark respecting the

dispensation. 'Licencia que se dà raras vezes.... Y entonces

parecio mayor liberalidad del Sumo Pontifice, por auer sido

el primer matrimonio consumado.' _Hist. Chyapa_, 17. See also

_Benzoni_, _Hist. Mondo Nuovo_, 155.

[XII‑8] _Alvarado_, _Carta_, in _Arévalo_, _Col. Doc. Antig._,

179; _Herrera_, dec. vi. lib. ii. cap. x. Oviedo says Alvarado

brought 400 men; that he touched at Española and took in

supplies, staying there 17 days and leaving on March 12th.

iii. 214-15. In _Datos Biog._ the number of men is given as

250, including hijosdalgo and men-at-arms. The cargo included

300 arquebuses, 400 pikes, 200 ballestas, much artillery, and

rich merchandise, valued at over 30,000 ducats. _Cartas de

Indias_, 709. The date of his arrival is obtained from his own

letter to the cabildo of Santiago above quoted. Remesal states

that there existed in the archives of San Salvador a letter of

exactly the same tenor, but dated April 3d, and as he quotes

the commencement, which is the same as that of the letter

preserved by Arévalo, it was either a duplicate, or Remesal

commits one of his careless errors. Gavarrete, in _Copias de

Doc._, MS., 43-4, gives the date as the 1st of April.

[XII‑9] Here, as will be hereafter related, Montejo

surrendered to Alvarado his claim to the provinces of Honduras

and Higueras.

[XII‑10] While at Santo Domingo on his return voyage Alvarado

told Oviedo that he had on the coast of the South Sea seven

or eight ships built for his proposed voyage to China and to

the Spice and Molucca Islands. _Oviedo_, iii. 215.

[XII‑11] His expenses were enormous. Bernal Diaz says, 'fueron

tantos los gastos que hizo que no le bastó la riqueza que

traxo del Piru, ni el oro que le sacavan de las minas ...

ni los tributos de sus pueblos, ni lo que le presentaron sus

deudos y amigos, y lo que tomó fiado de mercaderes.' _Hist.

Verdad._, 235. His will, in which he made Bishop Marroquin

his executor, shows that he had numerous creditors, who had

furnished ships, provisions, supplies, and money. _Remesal_,

_Hist. Chyapa_, 185-6. Vazquez says the cost was over 200,000

pesos de oro.

[XII‑12] _Niza_, _Descub._, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col.

Doc._, iii. 325 et seq.

[XII‑13] The claimants to this presumed right besides Alvarado

were Viceroy Mendoza, Cortés, Nuño de Guzman, Hernando de

Soto, and the city of Compostela in Nueva Galicia. _Id._, xv.

300 et seq. For further particulars, see _Hist. Mex._, vol.

ii., this series.

[XII‑14] Mendoza states that he fitted out as best he could 12

ships. _Carta_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, iii.

507; Herrera, 12 deep-sea vessels, including one of 13 and

one of 20 benches of oars. Beaumont, 12 ships. _Crón. Mich._,

ii. 252; Tello, _Hist. N. Gal._, 382, a fleet of ships; Bernal

Diaz, 13 good sized ships, including a galley and a patache.

_Hist. Verdad._, 235; Vazquez, 13 ships. _Chronica de Gvat._,

159; Remesal, 10 or 12 large ships, a galley, and fustas with

oars. _Hist. Chyapa_, 161; so also, Gomara, _Hist. Ind._,

268-9, and Torquemada, i. 323; Oviedo states that there were

13 ships, including large and small; 3 galleons over 200 tons

each, a fine galley and two fustas; the other ships being of

100 tons burden and over, iv. 19, 20, 23; Juarros, 12 deep-sea

vessels and 2 smaller ones. _Gvat._, i. 255, and Benzoni,

_Hist. Mondo Nvovo_, 154, 10 vessels and 4 brigantines. Bernal

Diaz asserts that the fleet was fitted out in Acajutla, and

Tello at Realejo. Lastly Oviedo represents Alvarado as sailing

from Iztapa, when 8 ships were built, to Acajutla. There is

even more discrepancy with regard to the number of his men.

Viceroy Mendoza states that the force consisted of 400 men

and 60 horses. _Carta_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col.

Doc._, iii. 507; Oviedo of 1,000 men, some of whom he brought

from Spain, and others had seen service in the Indies; Herrera

that there were more than 800 soldiers and 50 horses; Bernal

Diaz, 650 soldiers besides officers, and many horses; Tello,

300 Spaniards; Beaumont, 800, and 150 horses, and Benzoni,

700 soldiers.

[XII‑15] Herrera states that Alvarado despatched his

expedition to the coast of Jalisco, there to wait for him, and

went overland to Mexico, and Oviedo, iv. 26, also entertains

this view; but Mendoza and Gomara, _Hist. Ind._, 268-9,

distinctly states that he sailed with his fleet, and the

former's testimony is conclusive. Oviedo gives the additional

information that Alvarado sent a messenger to the emperor with

an account of his expedition and drawings of his fleet. Oviedo

had an interview with the messenger and saw the drawings.

Vazquez wrongly asserts that on his voyage the adelantado

discovered Acajutla. _Chronica de Gvat._, 159. He had already

done so as early as 1524. See _Hist. Cent. Am._, i. 670, this

series. Bernal Diaz wrongly gives 1538 as the date of his

sailing. _Hist. Verdad._, 236. The time of his departure was

about the middle of 1540, for on the 19th of May of that year

the cabildo requested him when on the point of departing with

his fleets to take with him the imprisoned princes Sinacam

and Sequechul. _Vazquez_, _Chron. Gvat._, 30.

[XII‑16] In _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, iii.

351-62, is a copy of the agreement between Alvarado and

the viceroy. Oviedo gives the copy of a letter addressed by

Mendoza to himself, in which the viceroy states that the king,

in his contract with Alvarado, was pleased to give him a share

in the discoveries without his knowledge or solicitation,

iii. 540. Mendoza states that this share was one half.

_Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, iii. 507. Article 20

of Alvarado's capitulation with the crown authorized him to

give Mendoza one third interest in his armament. _Vazquez_,

_Chronica de Gvat._, 159.

[XII‑17] 'Acordamos despachar dos armadas; una para descubrir

la costa desta Nueva España, é otra que fuesse al Poniente

en demanda de los Lequios y Catayo.' _Mendoza_, _Carta_, in

_Oviedo_, iii. 540.

[XII‑18] _Hist. Mex._, ii. 498 et seq., this series.

[XII‑19] When asked where he suffered, 'echando sangre por la

boca decia: "Aquí y el alma;"' and when the priest arrived

to confess him he exclaimed: 'Señor, sea bien llegado para

remedio de una alma tan pecadora.' _Tello_, _Hist. N. Gal._,

393.

[XII‑20] His injunctions with regard to the disposal of his

remains were but tardily carried out. _Datos Biograficos_,

in _Cartas de Indias_, 709-10, 745; _Tello_, _Hist. N.

Gal._, 395; _Beaumont_, _Crón. Mich._, iv. 276-7. Bernal

Diaz erroneously states that he was buried at Purificacion.

_Hist. Verdad._, 236. According to a clause in the will of

Bishop Marroquin, made in 1563, Alvarado's remains were still

at Tiripitío, 'donde està enterrado, que es en Tyrepati.'

The former left 200 ducats to the convent where Alvarado was

buried. He also left 1,000 pesos de oro de minas to found a

chaplaincy in the church at Guatemala, that masses might be

there said for his soul. Some years after the death of the

bishop the daughter of the adelantado had her father's remains

transferred from Tiripitío to Guatemala, where they were

interred with great solemnity in the cathedral. _Remesal_,

_Hist. Chyapa_, 190. Gonzalez Dávila says, 'En el año 1542 el

Obispo comẽçó à executar el testamento del Gouernador D. Pedro

de Aluarado,' and erroneously adds ... 'y el Obispo trasladó

su cuerpo de Mexico à Santiago.' _Teatro Ecles._, li. 148.

[XII‑21] _Tello_, _Hist. N. Gal._, 394-5; _Beaumont_, _Crón.

Mich._, iv. 274-6; _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 161-2; this

last author, page 187, states that Marroquin in carrying out

the intentions of Alvarado's will, ordered the payment to be

made for a set of clerical vestments which the friar Betanzos

ordered him to furnish as a penance in 1528. Bernal Diaz

remarks, 'Some say a will was made, but none has appeared.'

_Hist. Verdad._, 236.

[XII‑22] The viceroy states that Alvarado's debts amounted

to 50,000 pesos de minas, to which must be added 15,000 more

expended by himself on his account. _Carta_, in _Cartas de

Indias_, 253-4, and fac-simile R. Bishop Marroquin, August

1541, says that he left at his death debts to the amount of

50,000 pesos. _Id._, 429, fac-simile V.

[XII‑23] _Mendoza_, _Carta_, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_,

_Col. Doc._, iii. 507-8.

[XII‑24] In the valley near Santiago Alvarado had a large

plantation with many married slaves, collected in the

following manner: Soon after the conquest he summoned the

principal lords and demanded from each so many families,

with their head, who without more ado were branded and

placed on his plantation. These the bishop declared should

thenceforth be free, and possess and dwell on the lands they

had previously tilled, with the sole obligation of supporting

two chaplaincies, founded by this same instrument, for the

purpose of saying daily mass for the repose of the souls of

Alvarado and his wife. An altar in the cathedral dedicated

to St Peter was also ordered to be founded, before which

the aforesaid masses were to be said. The slaves in the

gold-mines are next declared set free, and are to reside on

his plantation; not, however, until the debts of Alvarado

shall have been paid, during which time their needs of soul

and body were to receive careful attention. The will concludes

with an enumeration of Alvarado's property, in which ships,

artillery, lands, negroes, houses, live-stock, etc., figure.

It was apparently never executed, for the audiencia of Mexico

ordered that the encomiendas of Alvarado which were the best

and most numerous of the provinces of Guatemala should not

be given to any one, but that one or two competent persons

be appointed to take charge of and manage them, and that

the proceeds be devoted to the public works of the city and

cathedral and the opening of roads, building of bridges,

and the assisting of poor people to rebuild their homes. On

the 10th of October 1542 a royal decree was issued declaring

that all the Indians and towns belonging to Alvarado were the

property of the crown. This decree was not published, however,

until Jan. 8, 1544. A protest was entered against it by the

city as being detrimental to the public interest, but it seems

to have had no effect, as the royal factor was instructed to

collect the tribute of the said towns, and take charge of the

Indians. _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 181-90. Bishop Marroquin,

in a letter to the emperor, dated March 15, 1545, recommends

that his debts be paid, as many needy persons will thereby be

benefited. _Squier's MSS._, xxii. 138. And again in June of

the same year, he states that Alvarado having left no legal

heirs, the estate reverted to the crown, and repeats his

previous recommendation that the debts be paid, adding that

the creditors were suffering, many of them being in prison for

debt. _Cartas de Indias_, 441-2. Consult also _Testimonio_,

in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, xiii. 268-70.

[XII‑25] _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 172.

[XII‑26] 'Fue mejor soldado, que Gouernador.' _Gomara_, _Hist.

Ind._, 269.

[XII‑27] In a letter to the council of the Indies he says:

'Pues todo lo que yo estubiere sin ocuparme en algo en que

sirba á Su Mag. lo tengo por muy mal gastado.' _Carta_, in

_Squier's MSS._, xix. 31.

[XII‑28] He wrote to the emperor requesting that no change

be made in his commission, as he had learned that Cortés was

soliciting permission to undertake the conquest he meditated.

_Herrera_, dec. vii. lib. ii. cap. x.; _Beaumont_, _Crón.

Mich._, iv. 252-3.

[XII‑29] I give herewith a copy of Alvarado's epitaph:

'El que Augusto le tuvo merecido

En este angosto monumento yace

Y Fenis de sus glorias hoy renace

Burlando su memoria del olvido

Mexico intime en eco repetido

Alabanzas qe. el tiempo las enlace

Qe. si tanto valor se satisface

Lo qe. a Romulo Roma le ha debido

Conquista fundacion y poblasiones

Y haber la idolatria disipado

Deshaciendo las nieblas de opiniones

Obrando bien con ser adelantado

Si hay sujeto capas de estos blazones

Todo cabe en D. Pedro de Alvarado.

Requiescat in pace.'

It is copied literally from _Gavarrete_, _Copias de Doc._,

MS., 53. Gonzalez Dávila, in 1649, makes this extraordinary

statement: 'Murio en Mexico, y yaze en el Convento de Santo

Domingo.' He also says that Ivan Diaz de la Calle, 'Oficial

Mayor de la Secretaria de Nueua-España,' dedicated to Alvarado

the following epitaph, which was to serve until one was

written such as the memory of his feats and actions deserved:

[Illustration: 'Yaze En Este Angosto

Monumento, el que merecia mas Augusto, que fue para la

Nobilissima Ciudad de Guatimala, lo que para Roma Romulo; El

famoso por la virtud de su valor, y vitorias, _Don Pedro de

Alvarado_, del Abito de Santiago, Adelantado, Gouernador,

Capitan General, Conquistador, Fundador, y Poblador desta

Ilustrissima Ciudad de Guatimala. Que la dio Templos, Leyes,

Costumbres, y Ritos. Despues de auer deshecho en muchas

batallas el engaño de la Idolotria, poniendo para siempre

cessacion en sus Altares, y Aras. Passó a la inmortalidad de

que ya goza en el Año 1541.' _Teatro Ecles._, i. 140.

[XII‑30] _Juarros_, _Guat._, i. 347.

[XII‑31] Doña Leonor married Pedro Puertocarrero and afterward

Francisco de la Cueva, brother of Alvarado's wife. Pedro was

legitimized by the emperor. This was, according to Bernal

Diaz, _Hist. Verdad._, 237, the natural son, mentioned also

by Saavedra, in _Pacheco_ and _Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, vii.

247-50, who went to the court of Spain to claim moneys due

to his father, and whom Saavedra recommended urgently to Las

Casas the councillor of state. Diego was slain in 1554 by

Indians at the defeat at Chuquinga. Marroquin informs the

emperor that Alvarado left six sons and daughters 'desnudos

syn abrigo alguno.' _Cartas de Indias_, 429, 432-3, 709-10;

_Gomara_, _Hist. Ind._, 269. Another son named Gomez, by an

Indian girl in Guatemala, is mentioned in the will afterward

framed by Bishop Marroquin. _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 185.

For an account of the presentation of Xicotencatl's daughter

to Alvarado, see _Hist. Mex._, i. 227-30, this series.

[XIII‑1] Originally written Giapa, as appears from several

original cédulas and other documents bearing dates as late as

1579. _Guat._, _Col. de Cédulas Reales_, passim. The meaning

of the word is differently explained, Chiapan signifying

'locality of the chia' (oil-seed), also 'sweet water.' _Native

Races_, ii. 126. According to Mazariegos it is derived from

'Tepetchia,' 'Battle hill,' the name of the stronghold where

the Chiapanecs fortified themselves against the Mexicans.

_Mem. Chiapa_, 12.

[XIII‑2] See _Native Races_, v. 231, this series.

[XIII‑3] _Id._, i. 681-2; v. 603-4.

[XIII‑4] For the aboriginal history of these people I would

refer the reader to my _Native Races of the Pacific States_,

vol. v., passim.

[XIII‑5] _Mazariegos_, _Mem. Chiapa_, 5, 6; _Cortés_,

_Diario_, xix. 390; _Juarros_, _Guat._, i. 10; _Id._ (ed.

London, 1823), 210; _Larrainzar_, _Soconusco_, 16; _Remesal_,

_Hist. Chyapa_, 264.

[XIII‑6] Mazariegos states that harsh treatment drove the

Indians to revolt, citing as instances that youths of 20 years

and under were sold as slaves at the rate of no more than

three pesos fuertes; that fugitives were hunted down with

bloodhounds, and that any one found warming himself at a fire

after eight o'clock at night was hanged. _Mem. Chiapa_, 6,

7. In these statements he is guilty of anachronism. The law

regarding the extinguishing of fires was passed on the 15th

of August 1528, and that arranging the price of slaves in

October of the same year, the former being almost immediately

annulled with regard to the punishment of hanging; but both

were enacted after the subjugation of the Indians. Consult

_Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 276, 278-9.

[XIII‑7] Called also Chiapan. This river takes its rise in the

Chuchumatan mountains. _Brasseur de Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat.

Civ._, iv. 574. It and its affluents form the head-waters of

the Tabasco or Grijalva. The Spaniards were moving up the left

bank, the town of Chiapas being on the opposite side somewhat

higher.

[XIII‑8] This force is less than that given by Gomara

and others. Bernal Diaz states that there were five other

horsemen, who, however, could not be counted as fighting men.

The artilleryman he describes as 'muy cobarde,' and informs

us that the natives of Cachula, 'Ibã tẽblando de miedo, y

por halagos los llevamos q̃ nos ayudassen á abrir Camino, y

llevar el fardaje.' He also asserts that the levy was held in

lent, 1524, adding 'Esto de los años no me acuerdo bien.' His

memory was correct, however, as is proved by Godoy's despatch

to Cortés, which will be frequently quoted later.

[XIII‑9] The Indians of Chiapas and its district were the

terror of surrounding towns, and were incessantly at war with

those of Cinacantlan and of the towns about Lake Quilenayas,

robbing, killing, reducing to slavery, and sacrificing

captives. They even waylaid merchant trains on the roads

between Tehuantepec and other provinces. Bernal Diaz states

that without exception they were the greatest warriors of all

New Spain, superior even to the Tlascaltecs and Mexicans.

[XIII‑10] The number of natives killed as related by Bernal

Diaz is so disproportionately small that some error must have

crept into his text. He says, 'Hallamos quinze dellos muertos,

y otros muchos heridos q̃ no se pudierõ ir.' _Hist. Verdad._,

178.

[XIII‑11] Bernal Diaz remarks that Chiapas could in truth be

called a city, for its streets were well laid out, and its

houses strongly built, containing more than 4,000 heads of

families.

[XIII‑12] _Id._, _Godoy_, _Rel._, in _Barcia_, i. 167;

_Gomara_, _Hist. Mex._, 233. Brasseur de Bourbourg suggests

that these aprons were made of india-rubber. _Hist. Nat.

Civ._, iv. 574; but Bernal Diaz, 178, says, 'Cõ buenas armas

de algodõ,' and Gomara, 'vnos paneses rodados de algodon

hilado.'

[XIII‑13] Bernal Diaz' contempt of this man is expressed by an

epithet particularly offensive to a Spaniard, 'nuestro negro

Artillero que llevavavamos'(sic) '(q̃ bien negro se podra

llamar).' _Hist. Verdad._, 179.

[XIII‑14] 'Y traian en vn brasero sahumerio, y vnos idolos de

piedra.' _Id._

[XIII‑15] 'Y diximos al Fraile q̃ nos encomendase á Dios.'

_Id._

[XIII‑16] 'Nos hirierõ cesique á todos los mas, y a algunos

á dos, y á tres heridas.' _Id._, 180.

[XIII‑17] Three prisons of latticed timbers were discovered in

the city. These were filled with captives who had been seized

on the roads. Among them some were from Tehuantepec, others

were Zapotecs and Soconuscans. Many Indians also were found

sacrificed, and in the temples were hideous idols, 'y hallamos

muchas cosas malas de sodomias que vsavan.' _Id._, 180.

[XIII‑18] Called by Bernal Diaz Gueyhuiztlan, also

Guequiztlan, Gueguistitlan, and Guegustitlan, which are

probably misprints. _Hist. Verdad._, 180-1. Godoy spells it

Huegueyztean. _Rel._, in _Barcia_, i. 168. The first author

writes for Cinacantlan, Cinacatan; Godoy, Cenacantean; and

Herrera, Canacantean. dec. iii. lib. v. cap. ix.

[XIII‑19] Godoy in his despatch to Cortés states that Medina

was released on bail, but that on their return to Espíritu

Santo he had imprisoned him, and that justice would be dealt

him. Bernal Diaz, however, states that Marin ordered him to

be sent under guard to Cortés: 'y luego manda que por la posta

le lleuassen a Mexico, para que Cortés le castigasse.' _Hist.

Verdad._, 180. Herrera, followed by Brasseur de Bourbourg,

asserts that Godoy sent him to Cortés. dec. iii. lib. v. cap.

ix. Oviedo makes no mention of the circumstance. Bernal Diaz

informs us that the offender was a soldier of high standing,

and refrains from giving his name for the sake of his honor,

but with amusing inconsistency states that he will mention it

later, which he does on page 198. Medina's fate was tragic,

but merited; he was killed by Indians at Xicalanco, for

particulars of which event see _Hist. Cent. Am._, i. 543-4,

this series. Remesal and Beaumont give a version of his death

somewhat different from that of Bernal Diaz, who is the more

reliable authority. They state that Medina had been sent after

Cortés to inform him of the disturbances which had arisen

in Mexico during his absence on the Honduras expedition,

and that he was captured by the Indians of Xicalanco, who,

sticking splinters of pitch-pine into his body and setting

fire to them, made him walk round a hole in the ground till

he expired. _Hist. Chyapa_, 164; _Crón. Mich._, MS., 322.

[XIII‑20] It was here that Ciudad Real, or Chiapas de los

Españoles, was founded later. _Id._, 181; _Godoy_, _Rel._, in

_Barcia_, i. 167.

[XIII‑21] Cinacantlan lay between Chiapas and Chamula about

three leagues from the latter. _Hist. Verdad._, 180.

[XIII‑22] Called Chamolla by Herrera, and also by Gomara.

_Conq. Mex._, 233; Chamolán by Ixtlilxochitl. _Horribles

Crueldades_, 71.

[XIII‑23] Godoy states that the horsemen were divided into

three troops, which were stationed so as to form a cordon

round the hill; Bernal Diaz that the cavalry attempted the

steep, but were found to be useless, and that Marin therefore

ordered them to retire, as he feared an attack from the towns

of Quiahuitlan (Huehueiztlan?).

[XIII‑24] 'Yno les podiamos hazer daño ninguno con los grandes

mamparos que tenian, y ellos à nosotros si, que siempre herian

muchos de los nuestros.' _Bernal Diaz_, _Hist. Verdad._, 181.

Godoy on the contrary says that the Chamulans sustained heavy

loss from the cannon and cross-bows. _Rel._, in _Barcia_, i.

167-8.

[XIII‑25] Godoy makes no mention of the building of these

sheds.

[XIII‑26] 'Y agua y sangre toda rebuelta, y mui caliente,'

was also showered down upon the Spaniards according to Bernal

Diaz. Godoy says 'nos echaban mucha agua caliente, embuelta

en ceniça, i cal.'

[XIII‑27] Bernal Diaz gives a glowing account of the shower

of golden ornaments: 'Y nos echaron desde las almenas siete

diademas de oro fino, y muchas cuentas vaziadizas, é otras

joyas como caracoles y anades todo de oro.' _Hist. Verdad._,

181. Godoy on the contrary says: 'echaron vn poco de Oro desde

dentro, diciendo, que dos Petacas tenian de aquello.' _Rel._,

in _Barcia_, i. 168. Herrera and Gomara follow Godoy.

[XIII‑28] Three o'clock in the afternoon. Bernal Diaz is

frequently at variance with Godoy in minor points, and from

his account this would be either the third day of the siege,

or the assault with the sheds was commenced on the first day;

neither of these statements agreeing with Godoy. I consider

the latter more reliable in many matters of detail, as he

wrote almost immediately after the occurrences.

[XIII‑29] Bernal Diaz was slightly wounded by a spear-thrust

in the contest which occurred before the rain-storm, and was

only saved by the thickness of his cotton corslet. He claims

to have discovered the ruse of the Chamulans in planting

their spears in position, but on this point his narrative is

doubtful. Godoy says, 'I hallamonos burlados ... i subiendo

el Albarrada, no havia Hombre dentro.' _Rel._, in _Barcia_,

i. 168.

[XIII‑30] 'Hallamos harto de comer, que bien lo haviamos

menester, à causa que los dos Dias no haviamos comido, ni

teniamos que ni aun los Caballos.' _Id._ Ixtlilxochitl,

contrary to Bernal Diaz, Godoy, Gomara, and Herrera, states

that they obtained much booty but few provisions. _Horribles

Crueldades_, 71.

[XIII‑31] Godoy states that 200 Indians had been killed on

the first day of the siege; while on the second so many fell

that they were not counted. The town was assigned by Luis

Marin to Bernal Diaz, as a reward for having first entered it,

and Cortés ratified the grant for a period of eight years.

When Ciudad Real was founded the population of Chamula was

transferred thither. _Hist. Verdad._, 181.

[XIII‑32] Godoy states that this opinion was unanimous.

In this portion of the narrative he and Bernal Diaz are

thoroughly at variance, the latter evidently having wished to

remain. Considerable dissension occurred. Alonso de Grado,

whom Bernal Diaz describes as a turbulent rather than a

fighting man, produced a cédula signed by Cortés assigning

to him half the town of Chiapas as an encomienda. On the

strength of it he demanded of Marin half the gold collected

at that city, which was refused him on the ground that it was

needed to pay for the horses that had been killed. An angry

dispute followed, in which Godoy became involved, and it

was terminated by the lieutenant putting both him and Grado

in irons and keeping them prisoners six or seven days. Then

Grado was sent under guard to Mexico, where he was severely

reprimanded by Cortés, and Godoy released by the intercession

of friends. _Hist. Verdad._, 182. Now Godoy mentions nothing

of this affair, but states that Grado went to Chiapas, and

other Spaniards to towns 'que alli el Teniente les havia

depositado,' and were well received. _Rel._, in _Barcia_, i.

169.

[XIII‑33] Both Herrera and Remesal state that this first

expedition of Mazariegos was undertaken in 1524, and in this

statement only, and in the number of the forces, do they

agree. Herrera's account of the campaign of 1524 is copied

almost word for word by Remesal in his narration of the one in

1526; and the former author as lightly mentions Mazariegos'

second expedition as Remesal does his first. The latter may,

however, in this instance, be relied upon, as he quotes from

the archives of Mexico. The entrance of Pedro Puertocarrero

into Chiapas from Guatemala is mentioned by both authors, as

an incident of the campaign which each describes, but it is

impossible to believe that Alvarado could have spared that

officer with a body of troops during the eventful year 1524,

when fully occupied with the conquest of Guatemala. I have,

therefore, adopted Remesal's chronology. It is strange that he

does not seem to have had any knowledge of Marin's expedition,

as related by Herrera. This somewhat perplexes Juarros, who

remarks that Bernal Diaz' narration is 'circumstantially so

different from the relation of Remesal as to induce a belief

that the latter had been misled by false information.' _Guat._

(ed. London, 1823), 210-11.

[XIII‑34] _Bernal Diaz_, _Hist. Verdad._, 221-2. Guzman was

a near relative of the Duke of Medina Sidonia. _Id._

[XIII‑35] Mazariegos was cousin to Alonso de Estrada, then

governor of Mexico. Remesal gives the names of more than

80 officers and soldiers who accompanied the expedition.

Noticeable among them is that of Juan Enriquez de Guzman,

who appears to have returned to Mexico after the outbreak.

In the same list appear the names of two priests, Pedro de

Castellanos and Pedro Gonzalez. _Hist. Chyapa_, 265. From

Bernal Diaz we learn that Mazariegos was instructed to

take Guzman's residencia. _Hist. Verdad._, 222. It was the

performance of this duty, perhaps, which, at a later date,

made Guzman so bitter an enemy of Mazariegos.

[XIII‑36] 'Pelearon, hasta que pudieron leuantar los braços.'

_Herrera_, dec. iii. lib. v. cap. xiv.

[XIII‑37] 'Se despeñaron mas de quinze mil dellos en dos vezes

que fueron conquistados.' _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 330.

[XIII‑38] It stands, though in a ruined state, to this day.

_Mazariegos_, _Mem. Chiapa_, 13. The traveller Thomas Gage,

who wrote in 1677, remarks that the country of Chiapas

'surpasseth all the rest of America in that one and famous

and most populous town of Chiapa of the Indians,' which later

he says 'is held to be one of the biggest Indian towns in all

America, containing at least 4,000 families.' _New Survey_,

219, 233.

[XIII‑39] The object of Puertocarrero's presence is considered

by Remesal to have been the extension of territory under the

government of Alvarado. _Hist. Chyapa_, 265-6. Another author

states that at the commencement of the revolt the Spaniards

had hurriedly fled to Comitlan, where they sent word to

Alvarado in Guatemala. _Mazariegos_, _Mem. Chiapa_, 10. The

reader is aware that Alvarado was in Spain at this period.

[XIII‑40] _Hist. Chyapa_, 279. The colonists of Espíritu Santo

also laid claim to the territories of Chiapas and Cachula, as

is seen in a royal cédula of 1538, in _Puga_, _Cedulario_,

115. Juarros says that Puertocarrero being informed of the

disturbances in Chiapas considered it his duty to repair

thither and endeavor to restore tranquillity. _Guat._ (ed.

London, 1823), 214.

[XIII‑41] These appointments had been extended by Alonso de

Estrada in November 1527. On the 6th of March the municipality

drew up a tariff of fines, ordered a pillory and scaffold to

be erected, and transacted other business. _Remesal_, _Hist.

Chyapa_, 268-9.

[XIII‑42] Guez Gueizacatlan as spelled by _Juarros_, _Hist.

Guat._, 61.

[XIII‑43] A coat of arms was granted to the town in 1535. It

was as follows: A shield with two mountain ranges with a river

flowing between them; above on the right a castle, Or with

a lion rampant against it; on the left a palm Vert in fruit,

and another lion rampant, all on a field, Gules. A decree of

the state congress of July 27, 1829, again changed the name of

the place to Ciudad de San Cristóbal. _Pineda_, in _Soc. Mex.

Geog._, iii. 371-2. Consult also _Gonzalez Dávila_, _Teatro

Ecles._, i. 188-9, where will be found a wood-cut design of

the arms; _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 271, 272-3; _Mazariegos_,

_Mem. Chiapa_, 18-19; _Juarros_, _Guat._, i. 12; _Pineda_,

_Descrip. Geog._, 48. For meaning of viciosa see _Hist. Mex._,

i. 145.

[XIII‑44] The office of alguacil mayor was at last sold for

4,687 pesos; those of the eight regidors for 400 pesos each;

that of the public administrator for 4,200 tostones—the toston

being half a peso—that of escribano publico for 627 pesos,

and later for 1,110 pesos. _Purida_, in _Soc. Mex. Geog._,

_Boletin_, iii. 370.

[XIII‑45] For the incidents that occurred before the capture

of the town of Chiapas the account of Bernal Diaz has been

accepted as the base of this narrative, but the version of

Diego de Godoy, an 'escribano del rey,' who accompanied the

expedition, is also worthy of credit. The latter furnished

Cortés with two reports of the proceedings, though his first

one, which was written from Cinacantlan, has not yet appeared

in print, and is perhaps no longer extant. The second despatch

was written from Espíritu Santo, and was first published at

Toledo by Caspa de Ávila on the 20th of October 1525, together

with the fourth letter of Cortés to the king of Spain, and

again in Valencia by George Costilla on the 12th of July 1526.

In 1749 Andrés Gonzalez de Barcia reproduced it in Madrid,

in his collection of the works of the chroniclers. Godoy's

account and that of Bernal Diaz, though agreeing in the main

features of the campaign, are strangely contradictory in many

particulars. In weighing the credibility of their statements

it should be borne in mind that the former wrote his despatch

immediately after the conclusion of the campaign, while the

latter wrote from memory many years afterward. It is beyond

dispute that Marin commanded this expedition, as appears from

his own despatch and the statements of Bernal Diaz; yet in

_Gomara_, _Hist. Mex._, 233; _Herrera_, dec. iii. lib. v.

cap. viii., and _Brasseur de Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat. Civ._,

iv. 573, it is stated that Godoy was in charge, Marin being

second in command.

[XIV‑1] Benzoni spells the word Achla and states that the

town was situated at a distance of about two bow-shots from

the shore. _Mondo Nuovo_, 77. For a description of its site

see _Hist. Cent. Am._, i. 418, this series. Girolamo Benzoni,

in 1541, joined the Spaniards in their forays for gold and

slaves, and traversed the Central American provinces. Regarded

doubtless as an interloper he does not appear to have met

with the success he expected, and in 1556 returned to Italy

determined to vent his spite by an exposé of Spanish greed and

cruelty. In 1565 he published the work entitled _La Historia

del Mondo Nuovo_, dedicated to Pius IV., and containing 18

wood-cuts, with his own portrait on the frontispiece. The

second edition, somewhat amplified, appeared in 1572, followed

by quite a number of reprints and translations, particularly

in German and Latin. The well known version by Chauveton,

doctor and protestant preacher at Geneva, the _Novæ Novi

Orbis Historiæ_, Geneva, 1578, was frequently reissued. The

dedication praises Benzoni for exactitude and impartiality,

and notes by other writers are added to confirm and explain

the text. De Bry gave further value to this version by means

of maps and fancy plates. Purchas, among others, treated

it with less respect in offering merely 'Briefe extracts

translated out of Ierom Benzo.' Amends were made for this

slight in 1857, when the only full English version was issued

by Admiral Smyth, under the auspices of the Hakluyt Society.

The rendering is somewhat faulty, however, and the corrections

of Benzoni's uncultured style and misspelled names not always

an improvement.

Benzoni had evidently the intention of writing a more imposing

general history of the New World, though it dwindled into a

short narrative. There is an apparent effort at moderation,

particularly with regard to himself, yet the disposition to

exaggerate, or to lie, as Thevet intimates, crops out even

in his sarcasms, and yielding to credulity he allows a great

part of the narrative, on events or phenomena, to become

merely the record of jangling and weird rumors current among

gossips. This he partly admits by saying: 'In molte cose

ho trouato che vna parte non conforma con l'altra, à causa

che ogn'uno fauorisce il suo capitano, et più dico, che in

questi paesi si trattano poche verità.' lib. iii. fol. 128.

'Lo mas de su narracion sacó de los autores precedentes con

bastante fidelidad, pero comunmente sin juicio ni examen.

En los principios está lleno de errores.' _Muñoz_, _Hist.

Nuevo Mundo_, tom. i. xxi.-ii. Robertson refers to him as a

discontented detractor. He does not feel well affected toward

Las Casas, despite their common aim, but calls him a vain man,

incapable of carrying out his reform promises. Whatever may be

said against the work, much of the material is valuable, as

it embraces facts glossed over by the chroniclers, and gives

the personal observations of a man not imbued with Castilian

partiality. Indeed, Pinelo calls him an 'Autor poco afecto

à los Españoles,' _Epitome_, tom. ii. 589, and they very

naturally have returned the compliment by neglecting him.

A contemporary of Benzoni as traveller and author is the

Frenchman André Thevet, who claims to have travelled for

17 years round the world, to acquire a proper knowledge of

men and things, and who is credited with having mastered

28 languages. The result of his observations was issued at

Paris in 1558 as, _Les singularitez de la France Antarctique,

autrement nommée Amerique_, containing philosophic

dissertations on natural and moral history in the Levant,

Africa, and America, and remarkable chiefly for credulity and

want of critique. It attained several editions which are now

sought for their rarity, among them, _Historia dell'India

America_, di _Andrea Tevet._ Venice, 1561. He also wrote

the _Cosmographie universelle_, Paris, 1575, 2 vols. folio,

which is even more valueless, and admired only for its

wood-cuts; the _Cosmographie du Levant_. Lyon, 1556; and the

_Cosmographie moscovite_, published only in Paris 1858; and

he left several other pieces in manuscript. De Thou refers

to him rather severely as follows: 'Fuit patriâ engolimensis,

professione primó Franciscanus, dein, cum vix litteras scìret,

abjecto cucullo ex monacho celeberrimus planus religiosis et

aliis peregrinationibus primam ætatem contrivit, ex quibus

famâ contractâ, animum ad libros seribendos ineptâ ambitione

applicavit, quos alieno calamo plerumque exacatos et ex

itinerariis vulgaribus atque hujusmodi de plebe Scripturis

consarcinatos miseris librariis pro suis venditabat: nam

alioqui litterarum, antiquitatis atque omnis temporum rationis

supra omnem fidem fuit imperitus, ut fere incerta pro certis,

falsa pro veris et absurda semper sciberet.' _Hist._, lib. xi.

[XIV‑2] This epithet they applied to all Christians.

[XIV‑3] For the condition of the native settlements

in Honduras, see _Montejo_, _Cartas_, in _Pacheco_ and

_Cárdenas_, _Col. Doc._, ii. 223-4, 228, 240-1; and _Squier's

MSS._, xxii. 24-6.

[XIV‑4] By cédula, dated July 20, 1532, they were exempted

from other than a nominal tribute of two reals, _Juarros_,

_Guat._, i. 74; ii. 343; but this order was unheeded. In 1547

the survivors drew up a memorial to the emperor representing

their past services and sufferings, and petitioning for their

rights. The document was written by a friar and referred

to the licentiate Cerrato, who was instructed to see that

justice was done to them. _Memorial, 1547, MS._, in _Centro

América, Extractos Sueltos_, 41-2. An attempt was made at a

later date to impose tribute upon their descendants; but the

Mexican government confirmed them in their rights in 1564:

'Fueron amparados en posesion de su libertad, y se libró

en Tenuctitlan á 6 de noviembre de 1564 real provision, que

conservan los naturales de Almolonga en fólios de pergamino

encuadernados en forma de libro, empastado con tablas finas,

y forrado en terciopelo carmesi,' etc. _Pelaez_, _Mem. Guat._,

i. 167.

[XIV‑5] In the time of Alvarado the tribute of cacao was

1,400 xiquipiles, and this was paid until 1542. _Requête

d'Atitlan_, in _Ternaux-Compans_, _Voy._, série i. tom. x.

420-2. A xiquipil was 8,000, and the number of chocolate-beans

contributed was therefore 11,200,000.

[XIV‑6] _Regio_, _Ind. Devastat._, 38-40. How populous the

country was may be imagined from the fact that Alvarado

represented it as exceeding Mexico in the number of its

inhabitants. 'Et ipsemet tyrannus scripsit majorem esse in

hac provincia populi frequentiam, quám in Regno Mexico, quod

& verum est.' _Id._ Las Casas also states that, when the

Spaniards first entered the country, the towns and villages

were so many and large and so densely populated that those who

marched in advance not infrequently returned to the captain

demanding a reward for having discovered another city equal

in size to Mexico. _Hist. Apolog._, MS., 28.

[XIV‑7] It will be remembered, however, that Alvarado procured

relays of Indians from Guatemala to pack his material and

supplies from Trujillo to Iztapa. Enough were left, remarks

Remesal, upon whom to wreak his vengeance, and the Cakchiquel

and Quiché princes, who appeared before him to do him homage,

became the first victims. They were reproached with the

reforms brought about in their favor, during his absence,

as of crimes worthy of capital punishment; for daring to

complain to the governor they were accused of rebellion.

Nameless adventurers, who had been unable to extort enough

gold from them, or take from them their vassals to work

in their fields and houses, pretended that the ill-will of

these chiefs had caused their ruin, and loudly demanded that

the adelantado should grant new repartimientos according to

their services. Alvarado, who was wounded to the quick by the

appointment of Maldonado, listened to all these complaints,

and now displayed his usual brutality. Prince Cook, Ahtzib of

the Cakchiquel crown, he ran through with a sword. Tepepul,

king of Gumarcaah, or Utatlan, and the Ahpozotzil Cahi Imox,

together with a large number of lords, were cast into a prison

on some frivolous pretext. When on the point of sailing from

Iztapa, Alvarado being requested by the municipal council to

determine their fate, settled the matter by hanging the latter

and putting the former together with a number of the leading

caciques on board his fleet. All of them perished miserably

on the coast of Jalisco. Among his other victims was a lord

called Chuwi-Tziquinu and 17 other Cakchiquel princes, whom

he took with him from Santiago under pretence of conducting

them to Mexico. When a short distance from the city he caused

them all to be strangled. _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, lib. iv.

cap. iv. v. xx.; _Brasseur de Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat. Civ._,

iv. 797-801; _Pelaez_, _Mem. Guat._, i. 77.

[XIV‑8] _Real Cédula de 17 de Novre 1526_, in _Soc. Mex.

Geog._, _Boletin_, v. 326-31. In the preamble to this decree

the emperor states that it is notorious that excessive toil

in mines and at other labor and the want of food and proper

clothing had caused the death of such numbers that some parts

of the country had become depopulated, while whole districts

were abandoned by the natives, who had fled to the mountains

and forests to escape ill-treatment. This cédula, designed

to apply to the king's dominions in the west from Panamá to

Florida, ordered diligent inquiry to be made relative to the

killing, robbery, and illegal branding of Indians, and that

the perpetrators should be delivered over to the council of

the Indies. Other provisos were that slaves should be restored

to their native country, and if this were not possible they

were to be placed in reasonable liberty, nor were they to be

too heavily worked or made to labor in the mines or elsewhere

against their will. In future expeditions of discovery and

colonization the leader was to take with him two ecclesiastics

at least, who were to use greatest diligence in obtaining

kindly treatment for the Indians. Natives who were peaceably

inclined were not to be made slaves; at the same time the

promotion of morality and good customs was not left out of

sight, and in cases where it might be deemed beneficial by the

priest they might be assigned to Christian Europeans as free

servitors; and lastly no discoverer was to take with him out

of their native land on any of his expeditions more than one

or two Indians to act as interpreters. _Ximenez_, lib. iii.

cap. lii., states that natives were branded as slaves through

having been merely assigned to an encomendero, and that young

boys and tender girls were taken from the towns by hundreds to

wash for gold in the gulches, where they perished from hunger

and hardship. _Pelaez_, _Mem. Guat._, i. 67. A notable case

of branding Indians who had peaceably submitted, was that of

the natives of Cuzcatlan by Alvarado in 1524, described by

witnesses in _Cortés_, _Residencia_, 96, 155.

[XIV‑9] This order repeated the mandates of the previous

cédula, and in addition abolished the system of encomiendas,

as well as the branding of Indians as slaves. His majesty

refused to grant them as vassals to any one. No Spaniard was

to be allowed to use them as pack-animals. The caciques were

not to be deprived entirely of governing power, but allowed

certain jurisdiction, under the advice and instruction of

the governors of provinces. Natives were to be encouraged in

gold-mining; but, on payment of the royal dues, the gold they

extracted was to belong to themselves; nor were they to be

deprived of the lands they had acquired by inheritance, if

they wished to cultivate them.

[XIV‑10] In 1533 it was enacted that an Indian's load should

not exceed two arrobas in weight. In 1536 it was ordered that

natives who had been accustomed to move from place to place

were not to be prevented from doing so. Other laws passed the

same year were to the effect that no Spaniard of any rank

could be carried about by Indians in hammock or palanquin.

Negroes ill-treating Indians were to receive 100 lashes, or

if blood were shed, a punishment adequate to the severity of

the wound. Native villages and settlements were not to be

inhabited by Spaniards, negroes, or mulattoes. A Spaniard

when travelling could only remain one night, and Spanish

traders three days, in an Indian village. In 1538 laws were

made ordering that caciques were not to sell or barter their

subjects. This year also a modification of previous enactments

limited the use of natives as pack-animals to those under 18

years of age. The Indians were, by all possible means other

than coercion, to be induced to live in communities. In 1541

viceroys, audiencias, and governors were ordered to ascertain

whether encomenderos sold their slaves, and if any such

were discovered they were to be exemplarily punished and the

bondsmen thus sold restored to liberty. _Recop. de Indias_,

ii. 192, 194, 201-2, 212, 277-8, 288-9. These laws were

general and applied to all Spanish America. Vazquez states

that, in the year 1714, there existed in the city archives

of Guatemala royal cédulas, issued in 1531, 1533, and 1534,

authorizing the branding of slaves taken in war or obtained

by _rescate_. _Chronica de Gvat._, 37-8.

[XIV‑11] In December 1530 the cabildo of Santiago was

compelled to pass a law ordering the burial of the dead. 'Los

Indios que mueren en sus casas, no los entierran, è los dexan

comer de perros, y aues, è podrir dentro de la dicha ciudad,

de que suelen venir è recrecer muchas dolencias á los vezinos

y habitãtes.' _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 30. Christianized

Indians, whether servant or slave, were to be buried in

consecrated ground at the depth of the waist-belt of a man of

good stature. Others were to be buried an _estado_ deep, out

of reach of dogs, under penalty of 20 pesos de oro. _Id._

[XIV‑12] In 1529 laws were passed prohibiting such acts under

a penalty of 25 pesos de oro, the proprietor of the servant to

forfeit his ownership. If the person offending were an hidalgo

the fine was 100 pesos de oro; if not he was to receive 100

lashes. _Arévalo_, _Actas Ayunt. Guat._, 90-1, 114-15. The

market called by the Indians _tianguez_ was held daily at

sunset. To provide against the outrages then committed a

master of the market was appointed in 1532. In the following

year another decree was found necessary, which was republished

February 9, 1534. _Remesal_, _Hist. Chyapa_, 32.

[XIV‑13] Paul III. it will be remembered is noted as the

pontiff who excommunicated Henry VIII. of England, and in the

contest of Charles V. with the Protestant League despatched

a large force to the emperor's aid.

[XIV‑14] It will be remembered that the inquisition, at that

time in full blast, was founded by the Dominican order. In

_Prescott's Peru_, ii. 253, it is stated that the arguments

used by Las Casas before the junta were first published by a

secretary of that institution.

[XIV‑15] The full text of them is given in _Leyes y

Ordenanzas_, _Icazbalceta_, _Col. Doc._, ii. 204-27. There

are extracts from them in Herrera, Remesal, Torquemada, and

other chroniclers. For further mention of the new code and

its workings see _Hist. Mex._, ii. 516, et seq. this series.

Prescott says: 'The provisions of this celebrated code are

to be found, with more or less—generally less—accuracy, in

the various contemporary writers. Herrera gives them _in

extenso_.' _Peru_, ii. 255. The historian is himself somewhat

inaccurate on this and other points.

[XIV‑16] Before the new laws were passed Indians captured in

war or guilty of certain crimes could be legally enslaved.

[XIV‑17] For a description of the repartimiento and encomienda

system, see _Hist. Cent. Am._, i. 262-4, and _Hist. Mex._,

ii. 145-52, this series.

[XIV‑18] For a description of the organization and

jurisdiction of audiencias see _Hist. Cent. Am._, i. 270-3,

this series, and of the supreme council of the Indies, 280-2

of the same vol.

[XIV‑19] The version given in _Prescott's Peru_, ii. 260-1,

is that the viceroy found a ship, laden with silver from the

Peruvian mines, ready to sail for Spain, and that he laid

an embargo on the vessel as containing the proceeds of slave

labor. There is, however, no absolute prohibition in the new

code against the employment of Indians in working the mines,

although, as mentioned in _Herrera_, dec. vi. lib. v. cap.

iv., a cédula issued in 1538, forbade that natives be so

engaged, and authorized the substitution of negro slave labor

for such purposes.

[XIV‑20] The emperor was memorialized by the clergy and by

the civil authorities, each party sending its petition without

the other's knowledge, each slandering its adversary and using

such falsehoods as would be most likely to injure the opposite

cause. _Abreo_, in _Cent. Am.; Extr. Sueltos_, in _Squier's

MSS._, xxii. 48.

[XV‑1] _Gasca_, _Carta al Consejo_, in _Col. Doc. Inéd._, l.

107; see also _Herrera_, dec. vi. lib. v. cap. iii.

[XV‑2] In _Garella_, _Isthme de Panama_, 4, it is stated

that Andagoya made his survey in obedience to a cédula issued

20th February 1534. Some authorities state that Philip first

suggested the idea of uniting the two oceans by means of a

canal; but when the survey was ordered he was not over seven

years of age. In _Hist. Cent. Am._, i. 360-1, this series,

there is a description of the difficulties overcome in

constructing the first road across the Isthmus about 1520,

and an account of the obstacles encountered by surveying

expeditions even in the middle of the nineteenth century.

[XV‑3] _Almagro_, _Informacion_, _Col. Doc. Inéd._, xxvi. 265,

and _Herrera_, dec. iv. lib. x. cap. vii.

[XV‑4] Benzoni goes somewhat out of his way to make Panamá

appear in a contemptible light. He says that it contained

about 4,000 inhabitants and had about 120 houses built of

reeds or wood and roofed with shingles, but he does not

explain how such a population contrived to crowd themselves

into that number of dwellings.

[XV‑5] In his description of a journey from Acla to Panamá

by way of Nombre de Dios, Benzoni mentions that his party was

accompanied by 20 negro slaves, whose business it was to cut

away the undergrowth and branches of trees that barred their

path. The same writer also alludes to the danger incurred

by travellers during the rainy season through the frequent

crossing of the Chagres en route across the Isthmus. He

relates a story of a Spaniard, who while fording the last

branch of the river, mounted on a mule, and with gold and

jewels in his possession to the value of 4,000 ducats, was

carried down stream, lost everything, and was saved only by

tying himself to the branch of a tree, arriving at Nombre de

Dios with only his waistcoat.

[XV‑6] In commenting on the statements then current as to

the commerce of Panamá, Benzoni remarks: 'Senza dubio dieci

Mercatanti Venetiani basteriano à comprare tutte le mercantie

che vi entrano vna volta l'anno, con la istessa città.' _Mondo

Nvovo_, lib. ii. 79.

[XV‑7] Pizarro sent 20,000 gold castellanos to Panamá and thus

enlisted in his service a number of recruits which he could

not otherwise have obtained. _Naharro_, _Descubr. y Conq._,

MS.

[XV‑8] Among other marauding expeditions planned by Almagro

was a raid on Panamá and Nombre de Dios for the purpose

of plundering both places, and making the former a base

for future operations against Nicaragua and Guatemala. He

intended moreover to destroy all ships on the Pacific side

that could not be utilized. _Vaca de Castro (Licenciado

Cristóbal)_, _Carta al Emperador Don Cárlos, dándole cuenta

de la sublevacion y castigo de Don Diego de Almagro el mozo y

de otros importantes asuntos_ (Cuzco, Nov. 24, 1542). _Cartas

de Indias_, 478, 483-4.

[XV‑9] On the very spot where his father met a like fate.

_Herrera_, dec. vi. lib. vi. cap. i.

[XV‑10] 'Españoles hai que crian perros carniceros y los

avezan á matar Indios, lo qual procuran á las veces por

pasatiempo, i ver si lo hacen bien los perros.' _Morales_,

_Relacion_, MS.

[XV‑11] In _Herrera_, dec. vii. lib. vii. cap. xxii., it is

stated that Gonzalo was elected captain, procurator general,

and chief-justice.

[XV‑12] It was truly a triumphal entry. Pizarro himself

was clad in a full suit of mail, with a richly embroidered

surcoat, and before him was borne the royal standard of

Castille. _Zárate_, _Hist. Peru_, lib. v. cap. xii.

[XV‑13] He gathered great strength by the adhesion of Diego

Centeno, a brave officer, who was exasperated by the cruelty

and oppression of Pizarro's lieutenant-governor in Charcas,

and therefore declared for the viceroy. _Robertson's Hist.

Am._, ii. 240.

[XV‑14] Vasco Nuñez was decapitated by a negro on the

battle-field, and his head borne on a pike. Some of the

soldiers were brutal enough to pluck the grey hairs from

the beard and wear them in their helmets as trophies of the

victory. _Herrera_, dec. viii. lib. i. cap. iii. See, also,

_Fernandez_, _Hist. Peru_, pt. i. lib. i. cap. liv.

[XV‑15] He ordered galleys to be built at Arequipa, which with

the vessels already in his possession would make him master

of the sea from Chile to Nicaragua. _Zárate_, _Hist. Peru_,

lib. v. cap. xv.

[XV‑16] Named by some authors Machicao, and in _Benzoni_,

_Mondo Nuovo_, Machicano. When Gonzalo Pizarro made his

entry into Lima, Bachicao caused the artillery, ammunition,

and equipments to be carried on the backs of Indians, thus

showing his contempt for the new code of laws. _Benzoni_,

_Mondo Nuovo_, 210 (_Hak. Soc._ ed.) See, also, _Gomara_,

_Hist. Ind._, 214, and _Datos Biograficos_, in _Cartas de

Indias_, 718-20. Gomara says of him: 'Lo escojeran entre mil

para qualquiera afrenta, pero couarde como liebre, y asi solia

el dezir: ladrar, pese á tal, y no morder. Era hombre baxo

mal acostumbrado, rufian, presumptuoso, renegador, q̃ se auia

encomenado al Diablo, ... buen ladron ... asi de amigos como

de enemigos.'

[XV‑17] On board the fleet were Maldonado and Doctor Trejada

on their way to Spain to render to the emperor Gonzalo

Pizarro's account of the matter and await his Majesty's

further instructions. _Pizarro_, _Carta al Rey_, in _Col. Doc.

Inéd._, l. 195 passim.

[XV‑18] _Gomara_, _Hist. Ind._, ii. 14. Benzoni states that

the captain was hanged at the harbor of Vecchio in Taboga.

'Fece alcuni soldati in porto Vecchio, e vicino Taboga pigliò

una naue, e perche il patrone non abassò le velle cosi presto,

lo mandò à impicecare, e cosi giunto à Panama, e non volendo

Giouanni di Gusman che intrasse nella città, ilquale faceua

gente per lo Vicerè.' _Hist. Mondo Nvovo_, 143.

[XV‑19] Benzoni, _Hist. Mondo Nvovo_, 211. See also _Oviedo_,

iv. 400. In _Zárate_, _Hist. Peru_, lib. v. cap. xvi., it is

stated that the order for an execution was given in the words

'Manda hacer el capitan Hernando Bachicao.'

[XV‑20] Of Bachicao's subsequent history we learn that he was

captured while attempting to desert to the royalist party,

and executed by Francisco Carbajal, one of Gonzalo's officers.

_Datos Biograficos_, in _Cartas de Indias_, 718-20.

[XV‑21] In addition to other precautions, Pedro de Casaos,

the corregidor, or mayor, of Panamá, crossed the Isthmus to

Nombre de Dios, and exhorted all loyal citizens to rally for

the defence of Panamá. Gathering all the arquebuses and other

arms which he could find, he returned to the city and called

upon the captains of the viceroy to place themselves under his

banner. This they obstinately refused to do, thereby sowing

discord which was to tell greatly in favor of the insurgents.

_Zárate_, _Hist. Peru_, lib. v. cap. xxx.

[XV‑22] Twenty thousand ducats according to _Benzoni_, _Mondo

Nvovo_, 144.

[XV‑23] Eight ships and three brigantines. _Benzoni_, _Mondo

Nuovo_.

[XV‑24] Juan de Illanes, as soon as he saw the ships, cried

out with a loud voice to the citizens, 'Come out of your

houses, ye traitors, come and defend the king's domain from

these tyrants!' When Pedro de Casaos sent word to Hinojosa to

inquire the cause of his coming he answered that 'he came to

pay the debts of Machicano.' _Benzoni_, _Mondo Nvovo_, 144-5.

[XV‑25] _Herrera_, dec. vii. lib. x. cap. ix. _Garcilaso de

la Vega_, in _Hist. Peru_, ii. 244, styles Hinojosa governor,

and Zárate, _Hist. Peru_, lib. v. cap. xxx., says: 'Y el

governador de aquella Provincia llamado Pedro de Casaos,

Natural de Sevilla, fue con gran diligencia à la Ciudad de

Nombre de Dios, i mandò apercebir toda la Gente que en ella

estaba, i juntando todas las Armas, i Arcabuces que pudo

haver, los llevò consigo à Panamà.' The corregidor of a town

was often styled 'governador' by courtesy. Hence perhaps the

mistake.

[XV‑26] _Herrera_, dec. vii. lib. x. cap. ix.

[XV‑27] It is said that a battle now appearing inevitable, the

officer in charge of Vela Nuñez was ordered to hang him and

the other prisoners to the yard-arm. _Zárate_, _Hist. Peru_,

lib. v. cap. xxxi. This statement is very improbable.

[XV‑28] He informed the people of Panamá that if they had

received a wretch like Machicao, they certainly ought to admit

him. _Herrera_, dec. vii. lib. x. cap. ix.

[XV‑29] They had no faith in Hinojosa's promises. 'Aunque

Gonzalo Pizarro governase juridicamente, como ellos decian;

y que no tenian color ninguno para entremeterse en distrito

ageno; y que las mismas promesas avia hecho Bachicao.'

_Garcilaso de la Vega_, _Hist. Peru_, ii. 244.

[XV‑30] _Herrera_, dec. vii. lib. x. cap. x., and _Benzoni_,

_Mondo Nvovo_, 145. In _Gomara_, _Hist. Ind._, 218, it is

stated that 40 men were allowed to land. Other authorities

give 50 as the number of the guard and 30 days as the period.

[XV‑31] 'Con este concierto Hinojosa mandô recoger la gente

a las naos, y los de Panamá le hablaron y trataron con mucha

cortesia, y le aposentaron en la ciudad y diziendole, que se

trataua de prenderle, ô matarle; aunque no lo creyô, todauia

se hizo fuerte en la casa adõde posaua, y poco despues, como

buen Capitan, por quitar ocasiones de tumultos se fue a sus

naos, y presto se entendió q̃ aquel rumor no fue palabras.'

_Herrera_, dec. vii. lib. x. cap. 10.

[XV‑32] It was during this year that the wealth of Potosí

began to be known.

[XV‑33] In _Herrera_, dec. viii. lib. i. cap. ix., it is

stated that Hinojosa's officers committed many robberies,

taking care to hide them from their commander, who strictly

forbade anything of the kind and gave orders that all such

offenders should be handed over to the civil authorities.

Gasca, in _Carta al Consejo_, 1. 108-9, says that Hinojosa

forced the people of Panamá and Nombre de Dios to feed and

quarter his men.

[XV‑34] A native of Álava, and a fellow-townsman of the

viceroy. _Zárate_, _Hist. Peru_, lib. v. cap. xxxiii. See also

_Garcilaso de la Vega_, _Hist. Peru_, ii. 244.

[XV‑35] 'Et non molto dopo Melchior Verdugo calato per lo

Scolatio di Nicaragua con duecento soldati con animo di

offendere la gente di Pizzarro.' _Benzoni_, _Mondo Nvovo_,

146. In _Zárate_, _Hist. Peru_, lib. v. cap. xxxiii., the

number is stated at 100.

[XV‑36] The darkness of the night favored them, but Verdugo's

men might have effected their capture if they had not been

too intent in plundering the house. _Garcilaso de la Vega_,

_Hist. Peru_, ii. 245.

[XV‑37] Herrera says that Hinojosa expecting to be attacked

placed the city of Panamá in a thorough state of defence and

told his officers that Verdugo held but the authority granted

him by the audiencia de los Confines and knew not even whether

the viceroy were alive. dec. viii. lib. ii. cap. iv.

History of Central America, Volume 2, 1530-1800 The Works of Hubert Howe Bancroft, Volume 7 · 第 39 / 42 章