FIRST YEARS IN SWITZERLAND
Departure of Hans and Ambrosius from Basel—The “Virgin and Child” of
1514—The painted Table at Zürich—Their arrival in Basel—Heads of the
Virgin and St. John—The “Cross-Bearing” at Karlsruhe—The five scenes
from “Christ’s Passion” at Basel—Work for the Basel printers—Holbein’s
first title-page—The marginal drawings to Erasmus’ “Praise of
Folly”—The share of Ambrosius in these illustrations—The legend of the
painter’s intemperance—The Schoolmaster’s Sign-Board—Double portrait
of Jakob Meyer and his wife—The “Adam and Eve.”
THE fortunes of the Holbein family, never very brilliant, having become
still more precarious, if existing records are to be believed, the two
sons, now approaching manhood, resolved to seek employment farther
afield. Possibly in 1513, but more probably in the spring of 1514, they
turned their backs on Augsburg and set out for Switzerland. Whether
Basel was their objective from the beginning or whether they arrived
there more or less by chance, in the course of their wander-year, and
finding work plentiful, resolved to make it their headquarters, there is
no actual proof to show; but their uncle, Sigmund, had been settled in
Switzerland for some years,[92] and had established himself in good
practice in Berne, and this fact may have had something to do with the
resolve of the younger Holbeins to turn their faces in that direction.
The discovery of a little picture of the “Virgin and Child,” dated 1514,
in a small village near Constance, which is attributed to Hans, affords
some evidence that their departure from Augsburg took place in that
year; that they had reached Basel some time in the spring or early
summer of 1515 is proved by the existence of more than one authentic
work by the younger brother bearing that date. Not long afterwards the
father himself left Augsburg for Isenheim, near Gebweiler, in Alsace, at
no great distance from Basel, and, so far as is known, never returned to
his native city, so that the old home was finally broken up.
[Sidenote: THE “VIRGIN AND CHILD” OF 1514]
The small picture of the “Virgin and Child” (Pl. 7) was discovered in
the village of Rickenbach, near Constance, by Herr Anton Seder, and on
the sale of his collection in 1876 it was acquired for the Basel Gallery
(No. 302).[93] It came originally from the Maria Wallfahrts
(Pilgrimages) Church of Rickenbach. On the background of the panel, on
either side of the Virgin’s head, are two coats of arms, the one on the
left being that of the Von Botzheim family, and that on the right of the
family of Ycher von Beringen. The picture, therefore, is supposed to
have been ordered by Johann von Botzheim, canon of Constance, son of
Michael von Botzheim and Anna Ycher von Beringen.
The Virgin is shown to the knees, a seated figure, holding the Child in
her lap, upon whom she gazes with downcast eyes. She clasps him to her
with her left hand, the right hand being placed under his chin. Her
white dress of soft material is arranged in a multiplicity of small
folds, each carefully drawn, and is decorated with a band of gold
embroidery; the wide flowing sleeves are drawn in above and below the
elbow with similar bands, and resemble the sleeves in the “St. Barbara”
of the “St. Sebastian” altar-piece. The lower part of the dress is a
very dark blue, almost black. She wears a golden crown, and her fair
hair falls upon her shoulders, as in the famous Darmstadt “Madonna.” The
Child lies quietly in her arms, a somewhat sad expression on his face,
with his small toes curled up, both feet and hands being admirably
drawn. The background is a deep red, and over the Virgin’s head hangs a
festoon of laurel leaves, suspended from the painted framework which
surrounds the group. This framework represents white stone pillars, with
panels of black marble decorated with Renaissance ornamentation, and a
number of small naked putti, three on either side and seven on the top.
Some of these little winged angels salute the Virgin with trumpets,
others carry the instruments of Christ’s Passion, and four of them hold
small tablets for inscriptions. These delightfully natural little
figures are painted in an ivory tone and stand out well against the dark
background. The work is immature, but displays a very tender,
sympathetic feeling, and possesses very considerable attractions. The
colour-scheme, in which few tints are employed, is delicate and
harmonious, and indicates that the artist already possessed a true sense
of its possibilities. The type of the Virgin resembles that employed by
the elder Holbein in such pictures as the “Fountain of Life.” The
natural affection of mother for child is well expressed, both in the
downcast face and in the drawing of the hands with which she holds the
little one close to her.
On the plinth at the base of the picture is inscribed, in Roman
lettering: “Que virgo peperit virgoque permanet lactavit propriis
uberibus deum portantemque gerebat ulnis prona trementibus. M.D.XIIII.”
It is regarded as the earliest authentic work of the younger Hans, but
neither his signature nor his initials are now clearly distinguishable
upon it, and its authorship is not absolutely certain. The four small
tablets in the hands of the putti at one time held inscriptions. No
traces of them remain on the two on the right, but portions of those on
the left are still visible. On the upper one there appears to be part of
a Latin sentence and the remains of a date “151—.” On the right-hand
side of the lower one can still be deciphered some letters of a
three-lined inscription, in the top line “R.A.,” in the middle one
“C.A.” (Civis Augustanus), and in the bottom one the painter’s monogram.
To the writer this latter appears to resemble more closely that of
Ambrosius, “AH,” rather than that of Hans, “HH.” If this
supposition be correct, it would indicate that the elder brother was the
author of the picture, or, at least, that he had a share in the painting
of it. In style it resembles almost as closely the few known works by
Ambrosius as the earlier Basel works of Hans; indeed, in some ways, it
approaches more nearly to the elder brother’s art, as seen in his
drawings. In these there is a slight hesitancy and lack of decision in
the touch which is not met with in the younger Holbein’s work of the
same period. The tenderness of feeling displayed in the picture is also
to be found in such drawings by Ambrosius as the head of a young girl
inscribed “Anne,” in the Basel Gallery, while the putti have much in
common with those which bear the shields above the heads of his two
charming portraits of unknown boys, also at Basel. These putti, however,
have a still greater likeness to those so frequently used by his brother
Hans, as can be seen very plainly in the first title-page designed by
him a year or two later; indeed, the whole framework of the picture
recalls his handiwork. It may be suggested, therefore, that the
Rickenbach “Madonna” was painted, in part at least, by Ambrosius. The
two youths appear to have travelled together—though there is no absolute
proof of this—and it might be expected that any small commissions picked
up on the way would be given to the elder brother, who, again, may have
been assisted in carrying them out by his younger companion. Dr. Ganz
points out the close resemblances between this picture and a
silver-point drawing at Basel attributed to the two brothers.
VOL. I., PLATE 7.
[Illustration:
VIRGIN AND CHILD
1514
BASEL GALLERY
]
[Sidenote: THE PAINTED TABLE AT ZURICH]
A work of a very different kind, the Painted Table at Zürich,[94] has
been regarded by some writers as the result of a commission received by
Hans Holbein during a halt in that town on his journey to Basel. This,
however, was not the case. It must have been painted after he had
settled in the latter place, for it was ordered on the occasion of the
marriage of Hans Baer, a citizen of Basel, with Barbara Brunner on the
24th June, 1515, either by Baer himself or by some friend of his as a
wedding present, and the coats of arms of the two families are
represented on it. Shortly afterwards the bridegroom left Basel for the
Italian wars, marching as standard-bearer with one of the mercenary
troops, and was killed at the battle of Marignano on the 14th of
September in the same year.
This large table-top is of wood, and oblong in shape, with a slab of
slate inserted in the centre. This broad wooden border or framework is
painted with hunting, fishing, jousting, and other outdoor scenes. One
of the longer sides is occupied with a number of mounted knights with
long lances engaged in a tournament, attended by their squires and
servants. The action is very spirited, and several of the individual
figures are finely conceived. The corresponding side is devoted to
hunting scenes, including the chase of the stag, the wild boar, the
hare, and the bear. The last-named animal is represented in the act of
overturning a number of bee-hives. The decoration of one of the end
borders shows the banks of a river with a number of men and women
engaged in fishing, using both the rod and nets of great variety. In the
meadow at the back a table is spread for a meal, and two women are
cooking at a fire. On the other end is depicted a lady and gentleman out
hawking, with the branches of the surrounding trees crowded with birds
of many kinds, and rabbits playing on the grass, and, on the left, some
game is shown in progress, in which young men are capturing girls in
nets. The slate slab in the middle contains two principal subjects. One
of them represents the old legend of “St. Nobody,” the unfortunate
mythical personage usually accused of being the author of all breakages
and accidents in German households, and incapable of defending himself
from such false accusations, and, for this reason, represented by
Holbein with a padlocked mouth, and surrounded by broken crockery and
other objects of daily use. A comic poem on “Nobody,” by Ulrich von
Hutten, published in Basel at about the time the table was painted,
suggested this subject, and some lines from it are inscribed on a
ribbon-scroll above the dejected saint. The second subject is also
humorous, and shows a pedlar sleeping by the roadside, quite unconscious
of a troop of monkeys who have plundered his pack. Over the rest of the
surface a number of small scattered objects have been painted, as though
left there by the owner. These formed a part of the joke, and were
painted with a realism intended to deceive, and with the expectation
that the spectator would attempt to pick them up. Among them are a pair
of spectacles, a seal, a quill-pen, and penknife, scissors, a carnation,
and a folded letter with a seal, round the margin of which part of the
painter’s signature, “HANS HO,” can still be deciphered, though the coat
of arms itself is not that of the Holbein family. A circle in the centre
of the table contains the armorial bearings of Hans Baer and his wife.
In the year 1633 the table was presented to the State Library of Zürich,
where it was held in high estimation throughout the seventeenth century.
Both Sandrart and Patin saw it there. The former describes it at some
length. “In particular,” he says, “there is a large table which is
worthy of inspection, entirely painted by our Hans Holbein the younger,
on which, in artistic oil colours, he has represented the so-called
Saint (Nobody) sitting sadly on a broken tub, his mouth fastened up with
a great lock. Around him torn old books are lying, earthen and metal
vessels, glass pans, dishes, and various other utensils, but all broken
and destroyed. An open letter, on which Holbein’s name stands, is so
naturally represented, that many people have seized it by mistake,
thinking it is a real one. The rest of this table is ornamented with
various hunting scenes and foliage.” Patin speaks of it as “a square
table, about five spans broad, on which are depicted dancing, fishing,
hunting, fish-spearing, represented for the most part playfully.” In
spite of this praise, in course of time it became neglected, and finally
disappeared, and was not heard of again until 1871, when it was
discovered by Professor Salomon Vögelin, buried under thick dust and a
mass of old papers, and in a very damaged condition.[95] It now forms
one of the chief treasures of the Zürich Library, but it has been so
seriously injured by the neglect and ill-usage to which it was subjected
for so long a time, that even after more than one careful attempt at
restoration, much of Holbein’s original and entertaining work has
permanently disappeared.
[Sidenote: ARRIVAL OF HOLBEIN IN BASEL]
Although the exact date of the arrival of the two brothers in Basel is
not known, there is evidence to show that they were busily at work there
throughout the year 1515. Possibly it may have been their original
intention to make a halt in that city of only some months’ duration; but
they found it so profitable a field for their labours that they
determined to remain there permanently. Basel, with its famous
University, was at that time the home and refuge of many of the ablest
thinkers and writers of the day, and it opened its gates freely to all
whose advanced opinions made Germany and other parts of Europe
undesirable as places of residence. Its many printing-presses were
already celebrated, and the printers and publishers found constant
employment both for learned scholars who edited for them new editions of
the classics and the fathers of the Church, and for a large body of
draughtsmen, designers, and wood-cutters who were engaged in
illustrating their publications with portraits, pictures, title-pages,
and innumerable initial letters and other ornaments. This well-paid and
regular work which the city offered to all artists of ability was, no
doubt, the real cause which induced the two brothers to become citizens
of Basel.
Among the earliest works produced there by Hans were two small heads of
saints now in the Basel Gallery (Nos. 308, 309), apparently intended to
represent the Virgin Mary and St. John the Evangelist. (Pl. 8).[96] The
Virgin is wearing a crown, and her long straight hair falls upon her
shoulders, as in the Rickenbach “Virgin and Child” of the previous year.
The type of face, too, is the same as in that picture, and is seen again
in the “Adam and Eve” picture of 1517. St. John is represented as a
beardless young man with curly hair, and here again the head closely
resembles that of the man in the “Adam and Eve.” Each has a large golden
nimbus, which stands out against a plain pale-blue background. These
small panels are pleasant in colour, and carefully painted, but
otherwise afford few indications of the artist’s future greatness. They
formed part of the Amerbach collection, and in the inventory are
described as the young Holbein’s first works. (“Item einer heiligen
iungen und iungfrawen köpflin mit patenen vf holz mit ölfarb klein H.
Holbein erste arbeit.”)
VOL. I., PLATE 8.
[Illustration:
THE VIRGIN MARY
BASEL GALLERY
]
[Illustration:
ST. JOHN
BASEL GALLERY
]
[Sidenote: EARLY “PASSION” PICTURES IN BASEL]
The earliest work of Hans which is both signed and dated is the small
panel in the Karlsruhe Gallery (No. 64), representing “Christ Bearing
the Cross,” a composition crowded with small figures.[97] In the centre
Christ has fallen to his knees under the weight of the Cross, and is
urged forward by the brutal soldiery, clad in the costume of the
mercenary landsknechte of Holbein’s day. On the right stands St.
Veronica holding the handkerchief, and behind her the mounted Centurion,
with a small dog running by his horse’s feet, both animals very
inadequately rendered. On the left is a group consisting of the weeping
Virgin, St. John, Simon the Cyrenean, who is helping to raise the Cross,
and Joseph of Arimathea. Behind the chief characters is a crowd of armed
men and spectators issuing from the gate of a town, and in the
background a hilly landscape with distant buildings. It is signed “H.H.
1515,” and was at one time attributed to the elder Holbein, and is still
considered to be from his hand by some writers. It is so described in
the first volume of the second edition of Woltmann’s book, but in the
second volume he reverses his opinion, and modern criticism is mainly in
agreement with this. Though in many ways a crude performance, it appears
to be an undoubted work of the younger painter, conceived under the
influence of his father. The figure of the stumbling Christ, the action
of Simon, and of the soldiers striking at Christ are all reminiscent
both of the “Cross-bearing” panel in the “Passion” series by the elder
Holbein in the gallery of Prince Carl von Fürstenberg at Donaueschingen,
(Nos. 43-54),[98] and of the similar subject in the Vetter votive
picture of the year 1499 in the Augsburg Gallery (No. 61). Upon the back
of the Karlsruhe picture are the badly-damaged remains of a second
“Passion” subject, the “Crowning with Thorns,” also by the younger Hans,
first published by Dr. Paul Ganz in his recent book, which also has much
in common with the same two works by the elder Holbein.[99] The work,
again, is closely akin to the five scenes from “Christ’s Passion” in the
Basel Gallery (Nos. 303-307), which are certainly among the very
earliest productions of the younger Hans. Two of these, “The Last
Supper” and “The Scourging of Christ,” belonged to Bonifacius Amerbach,
and are the best of the set, the remaining three having been acquired in
1836 at a sale in Basel. They are painted on canvas, instead of on
panel, an unusual method for pictures of any value in those days, and
for this reason it is supposed that they were ordered for some special
purpose, such as the decoration of a church during Holy Week, after
which they would be rolled up and put away until wanted again in the
following year. The hasty execution which they betray possibly arises
from the same cause. They may have been wanted in a hurry, and the pay
for them was perhaps too small to allow of careful, elaborate work,
which, indeed, would not be necessary, considering the temporary purpose
for which they were intended. They have also been taken as affording
indications that the young painters did not immediately on their arrival
set up an independent workshop of their own, but entered for a period
the service of some Basel artist as journeymen painters for a weekly
wage.
The composition of these “Passion” pictures, it is urged, is too
elaborate to be the unaided invention of the two young men, and it is
therefore assumed that the designs were provided by some other painter,
and that Hans and Ambrosius carried them out under his instructions. The
name of Hans Herbster, whose portrait by the elder brother[100] is now
in the Basel Gallery (No. 293) has been suggested in this connection. On
the other hand, although it is not easy at the first glance to recognise
the workmanship of Hans in these coarsely-painted pictures, it is
equally difficult to point to any one among the older painters then in
Basel who, judged by existing works, was capable of producing
compositions of this importance; in any case, the colour-scheme was
probably Holbein’s own, as well as the vigorous expression given to the
heads, which, however, in some of the subjects is exaggerated to the
verge of caricature. The grotesquely ugly and brutal executioners in
“The Scourging” have much in common with such works of Hans Holbein the
Elder as the Passion scenes at Donaueschingen, and it may very well be
that these five pictures were the unaided productions of Hans and his
brother, based upon the knowledge of similar paintings by their father,
in the execution of which they had in all probability given him
assistance, and that they did not renew their prentice days in
Herbster’s or any other workshop, but started as independent painters
from the first.
In the “Last Supper” (No. 303) (Pl. 9),[101] the meal is laid on two
tables placed at right angles, with Christ sitting at the angle, and he
is represented in the act of passing the bread across the table to
Judas, who, dressed in yellow, is half rising from his seat. The supper
takes place in an open loggia or courtyard, the background being filled
with archways and openings through which the deep blue sky is seen. In
the distance on the right is a representation of the Washing of Peter’s
feet. In the night scene on the Mount of Olives (No. 304),[102] the
kneeling Christ lifts up his arms with a passionate movement. The angel,
a much fore-shortened figure in red draperies, flies head foremost from
the skies bearing the host. Christ and St. Peter, who is asleep in the
left foreground, are darkly clad. The background, with its tall, gloomy
trees, is illuminated by the torches and lanterns of the soldiers
entering the garden, while the light of the coming dawn is just breaking
along the horizon.
VOL. I., PLATE 9.
[Illustration:
THE LAST SUPPER
BASEL GALLERY
]
[Sidenote: EARLY “PASSION” PICTURES IN BASEL]
The “Arrest in the Garden” (No. 305)[103] is a composition crowded with
figures, and is full of movement and noise. In the centre Judas is
kissing Christ, who is surrounded by armed men; and on the left Peter,
with uplifted sword, has just struck off the ear of Malchus, who,
screaming with pain, and flinging one arm over his head, has fallen
prone on the ground, while Christ reaches down his hand to heal the
wound. Clever use is made of the spears, maces, and other upraised
weapons of the soldiery, which are seen against the dark sky. Many of
the movements of the figures are awkward and ugly, and the faces of the
men who are dragging Christ away are repulsive and exaggerated, but the
general effect produced is an impressive one, and the grouping is
noteworthy as the work of a youth of seventeen or eighteen.
The picture of the “Handwashing” (306)[104] is the finest of the series,
more particularly in the left-hand half of the composition, which
represents Pilate in the act of washing his hands in a golden dish. He
is clad in dark green, with an ermine cape over his shoulders, and an
Eastern turban, and is seated on a throne or daïs with pillars of
coloured marbles and an arch filled in with a shell design. Two
attendants, one in yellow and black, hold the basin and pour out the
water from a golden ewer. On the right, Christ, in dark blue and crowned
with thorns, is led forth to execution. In this picture the colour is
less crude and violent than in most of the others of the series, and in
technical achievement, more particularly in the draughtsmanship of the
group of Pilate and his attendants, is somewhat higher.
In the “Scourging” (No. 307) (Pl. 10),[105] Christ, a nude figure, is
bound round the waist to a pillar in the prison, his uplifted arms being
fastened to an iron ring above his head. His body is scored with wounds
from the lashes of his executioners, his head falls in agony upon his
shoulder, and one leg is dragged across the other in the extremity of
his pain. The action of his torturers is of the utmost violence, and
they jeer at him as they rain heavy blows upon his defenceless body. The
scene to be depicted was a brutal and ruthless one, and to drive it home
to the spectators, Holbein spared no details or efforts to make it as
brutal in paint as it was in deed. The agony of Christ is well
expressed, and considerable knowledge is displayed in the drawing of the
body. The bright garments of the executioners form a striking though
harsh contrast to the pale flesh tints of Christ and the stone wall of
the cell, through the doorway of which on the right Pilate is gazing at
his victim. Though by no means faultless, this picture has qualities,
both of expression and of execution, which are remarkable when the age
of the painter is remembered, qualities which already give indications,
however faint, of the coming greatness of the master. This picture, and
the one of the “Last Supper,” are noted in the Amerbach inventory as
among Holbein’s first works.
Taken as a whole, the series displays numerous reminiscences of the art
of the father, sufficiently so, indeed, to make needless the supposition
that in the painting of them the artist was assisted by some older
practitioner of Basel. They possess considerable dramatic power, and the
draughtsmanship, though in parts faulty, is often excellent, the signs
of hasty manipulation, which are very apparent, being due, no doubt, to
the fact that the pictures were intended to serve merely as processional
standards or temporary “stations of the Cross”; but the colour
throughout is for the most part crude and harsh. It is difficult, if not
impossible, to determine how much of them was the work of Hans and how
much that of his brother Ambrosius. The three which do not form part of
the Amerbach collection were regarded at the time of their acquisition
by the Basel Gallery as the handiwork of Holbein the Elder, but this
ascription has been long since abandoned. Mr. Davies is of opinion that
the “Pilate Washing his Hands” is entirely the work of the younger Hans,
and that “The Scourging” is almost wholly by him, while he gives “The
Agony in the Garden” and “The Arrest” to Ambrosius alone.[106] One is on
safer ground, however, in confining oneself to the assertion that the
pictures were produced in the common workshop of the two youths, and
that both of them may have had something to do with the painting of all
five canvases, but that the predominant hand was that of the younger
brother.
VOL. I., PLATE 10.
[Illustration:
THE SCOURGING OF CHRIST
BASEL GALLERY
]
[Sidenote: EXAGGERATED TYPES]
These pictures were painted at some date between 1515 and Holbein’s
departure for Lucerne in 1517, and are based largely upon the knowledge
obtained in his father’s workshop in Augsburg, before the short visit to
Lombardy produced so rapid an awakening of his genius. Dr. Ganz places
them in the last-named year, and draws attention to the strong
similarity of many of the motives to those of Dürer’s “Little Passion”
series of engravings, thus showing that the younger artist must have
borrowed from them freely.[107] It is probable that the set was
originally a larger one, and that one or two of them are now missing.
There is an elaborate pen drawing on a dark grey ground, washed with
Indian ink and heightened with white, in the Basel Gallery, which is
very closely allied to these canvas pictures of the Passion. It
represents the “Bearing of the Cross,” under the weight of which Christ
has fallen on his hands and knees.[108] He is in the centre of a body of
soldiers and callous onlookers, who have just issued from the gate, the
procession deploying along the outer wall of the town with its circular
watch-tower. The head of the procession turns at a sharp angle round the
corner of the wall. Christ looks up with his face contorted with agony,
while one of the leading soldiers strikes at him with a heavy club, and
a second pulls violently at the ropes in order to make him rise again.
Behind them a third soldier bears the ladder, while a fourth man is
carrying huge nails and the various implements to be used in the
Crucifixion. The head of Christ is evidently based upon Dürer’s
representation in his “Passion” series. In the brutality and
grotesqueness of the faces of the soldiery and the lack of expression of
those of the accompanying mob, many of whom do not even glance towards
the prostrate figure, this drawing closely resembles both the Karlsruhe
“Cross-bearing” of 1515, which must have been painted on the journey to
or shortly after Holbein’s arrival in Basel, and the Passion series just
described. In order to bring home to the spectator the cruelty of the
scene depicted, and his detestation of it, he makes use of violent
movement and brutal types, and even in the head of our Lord the agonized
expression is so pronounced that it becomes painful to look upon. After
he had gained wider experience of the art of the great painters of
Northern Italy, Holbein gradually rid himself of these cruder and more
vehement methods, and depicted the pitiful story by means of more
natural and less exaggerated types, helped by a deeper insight into
character. During these early years he was often employed in painting
subjects from the “Passion,”[109] and the gradual change in his point of
view and the maturing of his art can be seen very plainly in them, from
the early Karlsruhe panel and the canvas series and the drawing just
described to the great altar-piece in eight scenes in the Basel Gallery,
and, finally, in the masterly set of ten designs for glass-painting in
the same collection, in which the fruits of his Italian experience are
seen to so great an advantage. In the “Cross-bearing” scene in the large
altar-piece, as well as in the later design of the same subject for
painted glass, the procession issues from a similar gateway and passes
along walls with the same round tower shown in the earlier examples. In
the former, too, the procession turns sharply to the left, as in the
Basel drawing, while the same type of face in the soldiery occurs in
all, but gradually becoming less exaggerated and truer to life. The
ill-treatment shown to Christ, though still brutal, is less violent in
its exhibition, and the Saviour, though faltering under his burden, has
not fallen to the ground. In the altar-piece his face is bent downwards,
and cast into shadow by the Cross beneath which he staggers, so that his
agony is hidden, while in the glass design the face, though agonized,
has a spiritual beauty which is not to be found in the drawing now in
question. This latter is undated, but Dr. Ganz places it in the year
1517, and he considers that it is most probably Holbein’s design for a
picture, now lost, which originally formed one of the early “Passion”
series on canvas.[110] Holbein drew this figure of Christ over again for
the very beautiful woodcut of which only the single impression, in the
Amerbach collection, is known. This woodcut,[111] which, from the beauty
of its cutting, must be from the hand of Lützelburger, recalls Dürer
even more strongly than the drawing, from which it differs slightly.
Christ, who has fallen to his knees, has one arm round the bar of the
Cross, the other hand resting on the stony ground. A small twisted tree,
almost leafless, is on the right, and the background consists of a
cloudy sky. The head, with its crown of thorns, long hair falling on the
shoulders, its open mouth, and the drops of bloody sweat on the brow, is
a wonderful realisation of deep suffering nobly borne.
[Sidenote: THE “PRAISE OF FOLLY” DRAWINGS]
Both Hans and Ambrosius appear to have obtained regular employment from
the Basel printers and publishers very shortly after their arrival in
the town, but more particularly from Johann Froben, one of the best
known of them all, who was then issuing, among many fine books, numerous
works from the pen of Erasmus. The earliest work of this nature which
Holbein produced was a title-page in the form of a Renaissance arch with
a number of small cupids, one blowing a horn, others with spears, two
holding the flat cartoon or roll of parchment in the centre reserved for
the lettering of the title-page, and two others supporting a shield with
Froben’s trade-mark, the caduceus (Pl. 11).[112] This appears to have
been cut towards the end of 1515, and did service in several books
issued by Froben during the next few years, including More’s _Utopia_ in
1518. Two small panels at the top contain the artist’s signature, “Hans
Holb.” This interesting specimen of Holbein’s youthful skill in design
and other examples of his earlier work for book illustrations are dealt
with in a later chapter. Another design of the year 1515 formerly
attributed to Hans, and afterwards to Ambrosius, was the coat of arms of
Petrus Wenck, painted in gouache on parchment, in the Matriculation Book
of the Basel University, of which Wenck was rector in that year. It
represents a man in Roman armour holding a large shield with a coat of
arms in each hand. It is reproduced by Dr. Willy Hes in his recent book
on Ambrosius Holbein, Plate xxxviii., who shows that it is not the work
of either brother.
By far the most important of Holbein’s surviving works of the year 1515
is the series of drawings, eighty-two in all, which he made on the
margins of a copy of Erasmus’ _Encomium Moriæ_, or “Praise of Folly.”
Erasmus paid his first visit to Basel in 1513, in order to make
arrangements with Froben for the publication of his _Adagia_ and his
edition of the New Testament. The two men became close friends, and
Erasmus, who from that time spent some months every year in Basel,
always stayed in Froben’s house during these annual visits until 1521,
when he made Basel his permanent home. This biting and jesting satire on
the follies of mankind, written in Latin, with its punning title on the
name of Sir Thomas More, was composed by Erasmus, according to his
preface, during his journeys on horseback, and was done in order to
beguile the weariness of the way. It was published by Froben in 1514,
and Holbein’s pictorial commentary upon it was drawn in a copy of the
first edition, now preserved in the Basel Gallery.[113] The little
pictures have been done with the pen on the broad margins by the side of
the passages of the text to which they refer. All that is known of the
history of the book is that it possibly belonged at one time to Erasmus
himself, and afterwards to the theologian and schoolmaster Oswald
Molitor, or Myconius. At a somewhat later date Basilius Amerbach, son of
Erasmus’ friend, Bonifacius Amerbach, who continued to add to the
collection of Holbein’s works formed by his father, obtained it with
some difficulty, thanks to the kindly intervention of the painter Jakob
Clauser, from Daniel Wieland, the town-clerk of Mühlhausen, who was very
loath to part with it. Molitor’s ownership of the book is proved by an
inscription on the title-page: “Est Osualdi Molitoris Lucerni”; and the
earlier ownership of Erasmus by a second inscription on the second
title-page, also in Molitor’s handwriting: “Hanc moriam pictam decem
diebus ut oblectaretur in ea Erasmus habuit,” which shows that the
marginal illustrations were completed in ten days, and that Erasmus
derived much entertainment from them.[114] Molitor was living in Basel
until 1516, and afterwards in Zürich and his native city, Lucerne,
returning finally to Basel in 1532. It has been suggested that on the
death of Erasmus, of whom Molitor was a friend and admirer, he received
the book from Bonifacius Amerbach, who was the philosopher’s residuary
legatee, and made a point of presenting valuable mementos to a number of
Erasmus’ closest friends. The book contains annotations in Molitor’s
handwriting, and from one of them we learn that the illustrations were
done in 1515.
VOL. I., PLATE 11.
[Illustration:
HOLBEIN’S EARLIEST TITLE-PAGE
First used in 1515
_From a copy of More’s “Utopia” in the British Museum_
]
[Sidenote: THE “PRAISE OF FOLLY” DRAWINGS]
It has been suggested, too, that the drawings were made by Holbein at
the personal request of Erasmus, which is not very probable; and again,
that Molitor gave the commission, and selected the passages to be
illustrated, which is much more likely, and when finished presented the
book to his friend, and that it was for this reason that Amerbach made a
point of giving it back to him on the death of Erasmus. The book has
also been taken as a proof that Holbein had gained a good knowledge of
Latin in his school days, and that he selected his own passages for the
pictures; but the few Latin inscriptions on his paintings do not
indicate much proficiency in that language. The supposition that Molitor
was the prime mover in the matter, and that it was done for him
personally, and not as a gift to be presented to Erasmus, is by far the
most probable; for, as stated above, he was in Basel at the time, and
this would account for Holbein’s apparent knowledge of the language in
which the book was written. On the other hand, the pen drawings in more
than one instance do not so much illustrate the incidents and sense of
the text, as isolated sentences and phrases which appear to have caught
the fancy of the artist, and, therefore, are not likely to have been
selected for pictorial comment by a learned student of the book. In
recent years the drawings have been subjected to a searching examination
and comparison, and Dr. Ganz was the first to point out that it is
impossible to accept the whole of them as by Hans Holbein.[115]
Considerable variations in style are to be noted, and it is now held,
and with good reason, that while the more important share of the work
was due to Hans, not only did Ambrosius contribute a certain number of
the drawings, but that a third artist, some unknown Basel painter of the
school of Urs Graf, and possibly even a fourth, also had a hand in it.
One of these drawings, which represents Jupiter seizing the naked Ate by
the hair, and flinging her across his knees in order to chastise her
with his thunderbolts, bears letters which until recently were regarded
as the initials of Ambrosius, though not his usual monogram; but this
inscription has now been correctly read by Dr. Hes as the word “ATEN,”
and refers to the subject, and not to the author of the drawing.[116]
The two brothers must have been in constant communication with Froben,
and for the purposes of the work they undertook for him would pay many
visits to his house “zum Sessel” in the Fischmarkt, where Erasmus also
had his headquarters, and where, no doubt, they first made his
acquaintance. The illustrations to the “Praise of Folly” may thus have
been begun in some idle moment in a copy of the book found lying about
in Froben’s office, to pass the time while waiting for proofs or
instructions in connection with work in hand; and having been thus
begun, the interest would grow, and the printer himself would encourage
its completion, and, perhaps, show it to Erasmus himself more than once
during the short period of ten days in which the eighty-two drawings
were accomplished. Any lack of profound Latinity on the part of the
brothers, who in turn jotted down their fancies on the book’s margin,
may have been overcome by Froben himself translating passages of the
book to them.
The sketches[117] are drawn freely and rapidly, without any attempt at
elaboration or such careful draughtsmanship as would have been necessary
had they been a commission or intended in the end to serve as woodcut
illustrations in some future edition of the text. Many of them are witty
and to the point, and show that Holbein had a true sense of humour. The
wit is, perhaps, not so biting as that of Erasmus himself, but it
matches in character the satirical humour and popular tone of the book.
The contributions of Hans are both the most numerous and the best, and
some of them, in the freedom and certainty of their draughtsmanship,
show a distinct advance in his art.
VOL. I., PLATE 12.
[Illustration:
MARGINAL DRAWINGS IN A COPY OF THE “PRAISE OF FOLLY”
BASEL GALLERY
]
[Sidenote: THE “PRAISE OF FOLLY” DRAWINGS]
The opening picture represents Folly, as a young woman in cap and bells,
mounting the pulpit in order to sing her own praises to a listening
world, and in the concluding one she is seen descending the same steps
with a gesture of farewell, leaving a gaping and astonished audience
behind her (Pl. 12 (1)). One of the most beautiful of the drawings,
representing Penelope at her loom (Pl. 12 (2)), is now given to
Ambrosius, but it bears so close a resemblance to the style of some of
the figures in the “Dance of Death” woodcuts, that it is difficult to
believe that it is not by Hans.[118] Some of the representations of
single figures, such as the Pope under a high canopy (Pl. 12 (3)), the
Cardinal (Pl. 12 (4)), the Bishop (Pl. 12 (5)), and the Astronomer, are
drawn with greater care, and show a more serious point of view, than is
anywhere disclosed in the book itself. In these Holbein is seen at his
best, and also in the charming little picture of nuns kneeling with
lighted candles before a picture or carving of the Virgin and Child,
which calls to mind more than one of his later designs for painted glass
(Pl. 12 (6)). In several of them, such as the group of men engaged in an
animated theological discussion, and that of the young man looking back
so intently at the fair damsel who comes after him that, without
noticing it, he has stepped into a basketful of eggs belonging to an old
market woman, there is a landscape background of town and river and
distant Alps, charmingly though hastily indicated (Pl. 13 (1)). Among
the classical allusions there are comic representations of the slaying
of Niobe’s children,[119] of Vulcan splitting the skull of Jupiter,[119]
of Atlas staggering under the weight of the world,[119] of Polyphemus
dancing, and of Hercules quieting Cerberus by means of a sausage.[119]
Nicolas de Lyra is represented reading the Scriptures, and at the same
time playing a small hand-organ, in allusion to his name (Pl. 13 (2)).
King Solomon stands pointing to his open book (Pl. 13 (3)), and another
excellent little drawing is that of the young courtier or nobleman (Pl.
13 (4)). The sketch of Folly talking to his puppet (Pl. 13 (5)) is one
of the illustrations now given to the unknown artist who collaborated
with the Holbeins.
The drawing illustrating the phrase, “the golden collar of princes,” is
an unmistakable portrait of the Emperor Maximilian. A portrait, much
less easily recognised, is that of the writer of the book. In one
passage Erasmus has mentioned his own name, and opposite to it Holbein
drew the philosopher seated at a desk in his study, in scholar’s cap and
gown, engaged in writing the _Adagia._ Through an arched opening is seen
a view of mountain and lake (Pl. 13 (6)). To make certain that there
should be no doubt as to whom the portrait represented, Holbein has
written the name “Erasmus” at the top of the arch. Molitor, in a
marginal note, states that when Erasmus came to this drawing, in which
he is depicted as a comparatively youthful man, he exclaimed, “Ohé! Ohé!
if Erasmus still looked like this, he would certainly take a wife.” The
name “Holbein” occurs over one of the other sketches, which represents a
fat and coarse-looking carouser seated at table, draining a bottle of
wine, and at the same time fondling a woman seated by him, and
illustrating the passage from Horace which refers to “a fat and splendid
pig from the herd of Epicurus” (Pl. 13 (7)). This is said to have been
written by the sage himself in playful revenge for the introduction of
his own portrait among the foolish of mankind.[120]
This somewhat primitive jest appears to be the sole foundation for the
statements of several of Holbein’s earlier biographers that he was of a
gross and sensual character, too fond of the wine-cup, and, in
consequence, lived in poverty. The worst offender in this way was
Charles Patin, a French physician who had settled in Basel in the
seventeenth century, after having been forced to leave Paris on account
of some misbehaviour. He was the first to bring this accusation against
the painter, and later writers copied him without verifying his
statements. Van Mander and Sandrart, who repeated all the gossip they
could collect, do not allude to this supposed weakness in the painter’s
character. Patin’s misrepresentations occur in a short life of Holbein,
filled with inaccuracies, which he wrote as a preface to an edition of
the _Praise of Folly_, issued in Basel in 1676, in which, for the first
time, these marginal illustrations were published, being engraved for
the book by C. Merian from copies of the originals made by W. Stettler.
They at once became highly popular, and various editions followed, both
on the Continent and in England. Patin evidently allowed his imagination
to run away with him in his interpretation of this somewhat feeble joke
made at Holbein’s expense. There is absolutely no foundation for the
legend thus set going; the painter’s whole career, the high perfection
of his technical powers, and the extraordinary amount of work he
accomplished in his short life are more than sufficient in themselves to
refute it.
VOL. I., PLATE 13.
[Illustration:
MARGINAL DRAWINGS IN A COPY OF THE “PRAISE OF FOLLY”
BASEL GALLERY
]
There is a small portrait in the Grand-Ducal Museum at Darmstadt, dated
1515, at one time in the possession of the Von Schinz family of Zürich,
which represents, at half-length, a young man in scarlet dress and cap,
with long fair hair falling over the ears, the head standing out
strongly against a bright-blue background.[121] It is inscribed across
the bottom with the date between the initials H.H., and until recently
has been considered by most writers to be a work of the younger Hans,
and was reproduced as his by Herr Knackfuss. In 1904 Dr. Hes first drew
attention to its close similarity to the work of Ambrosius, and most
modern criticism is in agreement with him. It bears, in style and touch,
a far stronger likeness to the art of Ambrosius than to that of Hans,
and has much in common with the portrait of Hans Herbster in the Basel
Gallery (No. 293), painted by him in the following year,[122] which,
when it was in Lord Northbrook’s collection, was regarded as from the
brush of his brother; and still more so to the two portraits of unknown
boys, also in the Basel Gallery (Nos. 294-5). There is, indeed, a fine
drawing of the head of an unknown man by Ambrosius, belonging to the
Basel Kunstverein, which as a portrait bears so strong a likeness to the
Darmstadt picture that it might almost be regarded as a study for
it.[123] In the drawing the position is reversed, the subject being
turned to the right instead of to the left, but the dress and hair are
the same, and, judging from the technique, both are from the same hand.
The inscription on the Darmstadt portrait is possibly of a somewhat
later date than the painting, and there are faint indications of an
earlier one beneath it. When this earlier one was replaced or renewed,
the initial of the Christian name may have been changed from A. to H. In
his book Dr. Woltmann included the portrait among the works of Hans
Holbein the Elder, but modern criticism does not follow him in this.
[Sidenote: THE SCHOOLMASTER’S SIGN-BOARD]
At this early period of his career the young painter was willing to
undertake any piece of work, however humble, that came to his hand.
Thus, in 1516, he painted a sign-board for some Basel schoolmaster to
hang outside his house (Pl. 14). The panel was painted on both sides,
the upper and larger portion of each being filled with a long
inscription in German stating that the owner of the sign was prepared to
teach reading and writing in the shortest possible time, and at moderate
prices, to all comers, citizens, artisans, women, and maidens; and that
if in any instance the scholar proved too stupid to learn, no fee would
be demanded, but that children were to be paid for in advance at each
quarter. The inscription is the same on both sides, one being dated
“1516,” and the other “Anno MCCCCCXVI.” In the narrow space left below,
Holbein depicted two scenes representing the interior of the school,
with benches against the wall under the leaded windows. In one of them
the schoolmaster is shown on the left, in red and yellow, seated at his
high desk, with a birch rod in his hand, teaching a small boy in green
to read. On the other side of the room is the schoolmistress, in red
dress and white coif, at a similar desk, instructing a little girl clad
in blue and green. Between them sit two small lads at their books, one
in blue, and the other in yellow with a red cap. The second picture
represents the same room from another point of view, with a washing
cistern and basin, and a long towel fastened to the wall. In the centre
is a large table at which the schoolmaster is engaged with two young men
dressed in the fashion of the landsknechte, one in trunks of red and
yellow stripes, who is wrestling with a pen, and the other in green, who
is listening with an intent and highly-puzzled expression to the
instructions of the master, who is attempting to teach him to read.
Holbein has represented the mental perturbation of this second pupil
with considerable humour. Both pictures display signs of some haste in
the execution, but they must have served the purpose for which they were
intended admirably. Though slight works, they have undoubted charm, and,
small as they are, the youthful painter has managed to give considerable
expression in both the faces and the gestures of his figures, while the
light which comes through the windows is well managed. This sign-board,
now in the Basel Gallery (Nos. 310-11), has been split into two, in
order that both sides may be exhibited.[124] When in actual use it must
have hung from an iron bar over the pavement. It is quite possible that
it was painted for Oswald Molitor, who, as already pointed out, was at
that time in Basel, engaged in teaching.
VOL. I., PLATE 14.
[Illustration]
[Illustration:
BACK AND FRONT OF A SCHOOLMASTER’S HANGING SIGN
1516
BASEL GALLERY
]
VOL. I., PLATE 15.
[Illustration:
DOUBLE PORTRAIT OF JAKOB MEYER AND HIS SECOND WIFE, DOROTHEA
KANNENGIESSER
1516
BASEL GALLERY
]
[Sidenote: PORTRAITS OF MEYER AND HIS WIFE]
A much more important work of the same year, 1516, also in the Basel
Gallery (No. 312),[125] is the double portrait of the Burgomaster of
Basel, Jakob Meyer or Meier “zum Hasen,” so called from the sign of a
hare which hung upon his house, and his second wife, Dorothea
Kannengiesser (Pl. 15). This new patron of Holbein’s proved to be an
excellent friend, giving him more than one commission, and obtaining
important public work for him. Meyer was a man of influence in Basel,
and was the first citizen not of knightly birth to be elected as
burgomaster. His election took place in 1516, and it was no doubt in
honour of this event that he ordered the portraits. He was again elected
to the post in 1518 and 1520—no one was allowed to fill it for two years
in succession; but in 1521 he fell into disgrace, through secretly
accepting a higher pension from the French king than the laws of the
city allowed. For this he was dismissed from office, and made to refund
the money, with the exception of the fifteen crowns which was the
permitted sum. Objecting to this treatment, he was clapped into prison,
and was only released on his family paying a fine. During his
burgomastership many important changes took place in the municipal
government of Basel, and the Church and the nobility were gradually
deprived of all their privileges. In his younger days he had served as a
soldier in Italy with some distinction, and after his deprivation of
office he went there again, in 1524, as captain of a Basel troop in the
pay of France. On his return home he attempted without success to obtain
the annulment of the decree against him of exclusion from all public
offices; and during the religious disturbances of 1529 he was at the
head of the Catholic party, then in armed opposition to the Reformers.
The reasons which induced Meyer to choose Holbein as the painter of the
portraits of himself and his young, comely, and newly-married wife, when
there were older painters of repute in the town, are not known; but his
first wife, Magdalena Baer, had been a sister of the Hans Baer for whom
the Zürich table had been painted, and it may have been owing to this
connection that the young artist obtained his first introduction to the
burgomaster.
In the portraits, which were painted and framed as a diptych, Meyer and
his wife are shown at half-length and three-quarters face, turned
towards one another. Meyer is wearing a black dress, open at the front
to show his white, gold-embroidered shirt, and a scarlet cap on his
bushy, curly brown hair, which covers his ears. He is clean-shaven, and
holds in his left hand a coin, which is introduced to indicate his
calling as a money-changer, and also, it is supposed, to commemorate the
charter granted to the Baselers in January 1516 for the mintage of gold
coins. On the same hand he wears several heavy gold rings. His eyes are
dark brown, and his complexion of a ruddy hue, and his face shows
shrewdness and strength of character, while the eyes are intelligent and
determined. His wife wears a red dress, fronted and edged with a broad
band of black velvet across the breast, embroidered with circles of gold
ornamentation. The dress is cut low, to show a white under-bodice worked
in elaborate designs, with hanging tassels and a band of gold embroidery
of a heart-shaped pattern. Her hair and ears are covered with a large
white cap of thin linen decorated with bands of gold of a checked
design, of the hooded shape common in Switzerland at that period, with a
long white fall which is brought over the right shoulder and reaches the
waist. Round her neck hang two thin chains, one of gold and one of
pearls, the ends of which are hidden beneath the bodice. Her hands are
not shown. Though not strikingly handsome, she has youth and good looks
in her favour. The two portraits are placed against one continuous
architectural background, seen in rather strong perspective. In the
centre an elaborate gilt frieze of Renaissance ornamentation is
supported by short pillars of red marble, and on either side larger
columns, also decorated with gilded carving, form the supports of two
arches. Through these the blue sky is seen, against which the wife’s
head stands out in strong colour contrast. Owing to the perspective
arrangement, the opening is smaller in the portrait of Meyer, but part
of his red cap is placed against the blue sky with equally striking
effect. The signature, “H.H.,” and the date, “1516,” are placed on a
small shield in the entablature over Meyer’s head.[126]
In these two portraits—the earliest in point of date which can be
ascribed to him with absolute certainty—Holbein, though not yet twenty
years old, shows himself to be already a master of portraiture. The
qualities they possess are the same, though not yet perfectly developed,
as those which are to be discovered in such complete perfection in the
work of his maturity. They show that he had already the power of seizing
character, and was accurate and unhesitating in draughtsmanship. All the
details, more particularly the elaborate ornaments of the woman’s dress,
are drawn with a truth and delicacy that already falls but little short
of the brilliance of his technique in such a masterpiece of portraiture
as the Georg Gisze in Berlin, or the Jane Seymour in Vienna. The colour,
though rich and strongly contrasted, is harmonious and delicate in the
general effect it produces. The whole work, indeed, gives the impression
that it is from the hand of an artist who is already sure of his
methods. There is nothing faltering about it, and few indications that
the painter was still only on the threshold of his career. All that was
to come in the future was a deeper insight into nature, a greater
perfection of methods which in the main were to remain unaltered
throughout his life, and a more brilliant understanding and application
of the lessons of the Italian Renaissance to the more decorative
portions of his pictures.[127]
[Sidenote: STUDIES FOR THE MEYER PORTRAITS]
The rapidity with which his art was maturing is shown more strikingly,
perhaps, in the two studies for the portraits, now in the Basel Gallery
(Pl. 16),[128] than even in the pictures themselves. These heads, of the
same dimensions as the finished works, are about half the size of life.
They are drawn in silver-point, with fine and delicate lines, and
equally delicate modelling of the flesh, which has been afterwards
touched here and there with red chalk. They display the utmost care and
precision, though the line is less subtle and searching than it is in
the drawings of his greater English period. They are, nevertheless,
extraordinary work for so young a man, and of great beauty. They show a
method of procedure in the taking of portraits which remained Holbein’s
almost invariable practice throughout his life. He always made these
preparatory drawings—the later ones, of course, with much greater
freedom—in which the form, character, and expression of his sitter were
fixed once and for all. Colour was occasionally indicated, but as a rule
all that he did was to jot down on the margin of the paper a few notes
for future guidance. Thus on the drawing of Meyer, he has written notes
as to the colour of the hair, eyebrows, and cap.[129] It was his habit,
apparently, to rely upon his memory and these curt notes when he came to
paint the actual portrait. This method enabled him to dispense with many
sittings; after a few hours spent in close observation of his subject,
he had obtained all the information he wanted. For the rest, he depended
on what must have been a remarkable memory both for colour and form.
During 1517 Holbein left Basel, and was absent for a considerable time.
There is one work by him, however, of this year which in all probability
was painted before his departure, as it belonged to Bonifacius Amerbach.
This is the “Adam and Eve”[130] of the Basel Gallery (No. 313) (Pl. 17),
which is painted in oils on paper. It is entered in the Amerbach
catalogue as: “Ein Adam vnd Eva mit dem äpfel H. Holb. vf holz mit
olfarb.” It is a study from life of the head and shoulders of the same
models used for the heads of St. John and the Virgin already described,
while the “Adam” also served as model for the head of Christ in “The
Scourging” of the early Passion series on canvas. Eve, with a long curl
of fair hair falling over her right shoulder and breast, holds the apple
in her left hand, her face being of a rather dull and heavy type. Adam,
with dark curly hair, and a long moustache which drops below his chin,
and head slightly bent, has his right arm flung across Eve’s shoulders.
The general tone is brownish, but considerable effect is produced by the
contrast between the dark complexion of Adam and the blonder tones of
Eve’s flesh.
It is boldly and thinly executed, and the lines of the drawing are still
plainly to be distinguished through the paint. The fingers of Eve’s
hand, with high lights on the nails, are excellently modelled, already
giving indications of what afterwards became one of the chief features
of his portraiture, the beauty and character of the hands. Both heads
stand out against a background which is now black. It is signed and
dated, “1517, H.H.” Dr. Ganz points out the strong influence of both
Baldung and Dürer this small study betrays.[131] It also bears a curious
resemblance to the heads in the well-known picture of “Adam and Eve” by
Mabuse at Hampton Court[132] (No. 385 (580)), though the position of the
two figures is reversed. It is seen more particularly in Adam’s mass of
dark hair covered with small curls, Eve’s long ringlets, the expression
of pain on the faces, and the position of Adam’s arm across Eve’s
shoulders. There is another very similar, but smaller, “Adam and Eve” by
Mabuse in the Berlin Gallery (No. 661), displaying a composite art, half
Flemish and half Italian, which is signed and dated 1516.
VOL. I., PLATE 16.
[Illustration:
JAKOB MEYER
Studies for the Double Portrait, 1516
_Silver-point and red chalk drawings_
BASEL GALLERY
]
[Illustration:
DOROTHEA KANNENGIESSER
Studies for the Double Portrait, 1516
_Silver-point and red chalk drawings_
BASEL GALLERY
]
VOL. I., PLATE 17.
[Illustration:
ADAM AND EVE
1517
BASEL GALLERY
]
------------------------------------------------------------------------