4. _Breaking off the Fight, Retreat, and Pursuit_

When it becomes apparent during the course of a fight that success

cannot ensue, the commander must decide in good time whether he

will carry the engagement through or break it off. To choose the

right moment for the latter operation is generally extraordinarily

difficult, even when it has been planned from the commencement. To

make the necessary dispositions, also, demands great tactical skill.

To continue the fight with determination, perhaps till nightfall, will

often cost no greater sacrifice than the breaking off of the engagement

and the attendant retreat.

Generally speaking, such engagements will only be those which are

fought out on foot. The more open the country, the closer the enemy,

and the greater the number of troops which have already been thrown

into the fighting-line, so much the more difficult will it usually

be to break off the fight. The circumstance also as to whether the

led horses are mobile or immobile, and their position, will naturally

influence the decision. On the other hand, it is easier to extricate

the force after some success has been gained; whether it be that a

hostile attack has been repulsed, or that our own troops have made a

successful counter-stroke. History teaches us that at such moments

there is generally a lull, during which the opponent is obliged to

bring up fresh troops or to make fresh tactical dispositions.

Even under such favourable conditions, however, it will generally be

impossible to break loose from the enemy without suffering heavy loss.

In defence, if the ground is especially favourable, it will certainly

be possible at times to extricate a force without considerable loss.

If it can rapidly withdraw from the firing-line and retire covered

from pursuing fire, the whole force may under certain circumstances

simultaneously evacuate a position, that is to say, if the enemy is

still so far distant that he is unable to employ pursuing fire until

the defender has reached a place of safety. How seldom, however,

will such be the case! Small detachments will generally have to be

sacrificed to secure the retreat of the main body. This means that

various especially strong supporting points in the position will be

occupied, and the force will withdraw under cover of them.

Military history offers us repeated examples where the attacker makes

desperate endeavours to overpower such points, and in so doing forgets

to pursue the withdrawing masses of the defender's troops. This, for

example, was the part played at the battle of Weissenburg by Geisberg

Castle and Schafbusch, and the château with its enclosed park at the

battle of Coulmiers. Under cover of these points, against which all the

efforts of the French were concentrated, the defenders were able in

both cases to withdraw so slightly molested that even touch with them

was completely lost.

The defence of such supporting points, which must be conducted with

the utmost obstinacy, frequently ends in capture, but the end gained

is worth the sacrifice. If the endeavour is made to withdraw the whole

line of defence simultaneously under circumstances where it is possible

for the attacker to bring to bear an effective pursuing fire from the

captured position, loss will generally be much greater than that which

would be deliberately incurred in arresting the pursuit.

The conditions are similar in attack. At manoeuvres certainly we see

the attacker when repulsed turn about, and, in a continuous retreat,

lay himself open to a pursuing fire, which would mean absolute

destruction. I do not think such a manoeuvre possible in reality. As

the advance has been by stages, so must be the retreat. But, whereas

in the advance it was a matter of pressing forward on a wide connected

front, in order to hold the whole of the enemy's position under fire,

and _not_ of massing together where cover could be obtained, the exact

contrary is the case in retreat, and the troops must seek any cover

that will shelter them from the fire of the pursuit. Various strong

points in the attack which have already been taken and occupied must

be obstinately held during the retirement, and from them a heavy fire

poured into the pursuit to bring it to a standstill. Care should be

taken, even during an advance, to keep such places well supplied with

ammunition, which can either be taken forward to the captured position

or be at the disposal of the retiring troops.

I do not think that it will be possible in any other manner to break

off an attack which has penetrated to within effective range of the

enemy, or to carry out a compulsory retreat without disastrous loss.

The troops must fall back, obstinately contesting the ground and

continually recommencing fire from any favourable position. The

commander must make careful preparations, even when advancing, that

a possible retreat shall not lead to disaster, but will be able to

find prepared points of support. All detachments, however, that are

outside the effective range of the enemy's fire, and still capable of

manoeuvre, especially artillery and machine-guns, must from commanding

positions bring fire to bear on those troops which are harassing the

retreat, regardless of the losses they may themselves incur. In such

a moment everything must be subordinated to delivering the retreating

masses from that destruction which the fire of the pursuit portends.

Any advance of pursuing cavalry, also, must be met by heavy fire from

such detachments, regardless of the expenditure of ammunition.

A retreat, then, requires particularly intelligent handling. The

various detachments must be provided with instructions that are clear

and definite. The commander must have his troops well in hand, must

arrange for the occupation of any positions, decide which detachments

shall cover the retreat, dispose of the artillery and machine-guns,

determine the line of retreat of the various units, with due regard to

the situation of their led horses, and arrange for the occupation of

the rallying position. He should himself only leave the field when the

force has got clear of the enemy. He must then, however, straightway

attend to the rearrangement of the tactical dispositions, and take the

other necessary measures. Any reserve still in hand must be used to

check the pursuit where possible by a vigorous offensive. It is just in

such situations that a determined counter-attack, even by a weak force,

makes the greatest impression on the enemy.

As to the further conduct of the retreat after a successful

extrication, definite instructions are naturally impossible. Everything

depends on the circumstances of the moment. The possibilities of

resuming the offensive must be borne in mind, even during a retirement.

To this end it is frequently advisable to fall back partially towards

a flank. Gneisenau, after the defeat at Ligny, directed the retreat

on Wavre, in order to be able to take up the offensive again on the

following day, and thus supplied us with a brilliant example well

worthy of imitation even where the forces engaged are but small.

If it is a matter of mounted combat, the breaking off of the actual

fight is quite impossible. Troops once engaged must carry the fight

through. Even when retreating from the mêlée, fighting cavalry has no

kind of means of extricating itself. It is then entirely dependent on

the enemy, and can only retire at the most rapid speed. Reserves alone

are able to bring the immediate pursuit to a standstill by intervening

in the running fight. Generally, however, this will only end when the

horses of the victor are quite exhausted, or when the latter feels the

necessity of getting his troops in hand and forming again for fresh

duties. The further conduct of the vanquished troops must depend on the

condition of the horses and the general situation. It is of importance

to withdraw beyond the reach of the enemy as soon as possible in order

that full freedom of action may be regained.

If the fire of the hostile artillery is to be feared, it is advisable

to retire extended without regard to tactical formations, and making

the best possible use of the ground. The troops will then only rally

again beyond the range of the enemy's fire. The same naturally holds

good for the retreat from a dismounted action after the men have

remounted.

The commander will be well advised to inform his senior subordinates,

if not all the troops, before the fight begins where the troops are

to concentrate again in case of a reverse. The necessity for such

dispositions generally passes unnoticed in peace, because pursuit

is never thoroughly carried out, and the beaten troops are not so

completely broken up as has repeatedly happened in war in the past and

will happen again. We should not deceive ourselves in this matter,

as otherwise there is a danger of completely losing control over the

troops. Whoever expects to be able to rally a beaten cavalry division

after a mounted fight by blowing the divisional call lays himself open

to bitter disappointment. If the enemy is pursuing with energy, this

will only be possible in the very rarest cases.

Before the commencement of the fight, arrangements must also be made

for the rear communication, as there will otherwise be a danger of

losing transport, and thereby ability to operate. Far to the rear or

close at hand are the two only possible positions for it. In the first

case an escort whose strength will be dictated by the circumstances

will always be necessary.

It should also be remembered that wagons should be able to turn round

where they are halted. If single teams are unable to turn about on

their own ground, it will be better to park the whole of the transport

in such a way that it can easily be moved in any direction. It is

then also easier to protect it against attack. If there is no fear

of attack, the various columns may turn off the road with intervals

corresponding to their length. It appears to me to be of especial

importance to lay stress on these circumstances because in peace

exercises there is no transport, and commanders consequently get

accustomed to paying little attention to it.

As regards the pursuit, it is necessary to differentiate between a

tactical and a strategical pursuit. The latter must crown the success

of the former.

In mounted action, the beaten opponent must be kept at the point of

the sword as long as the strength of the horses hold out. Detachments

not immediately pursuing must be concentrated, and must seek to regain

their ability for manoeuvre as soon as possible.

After a dismounted action on the defensive, the pursuit will first

be taken up by rifle fire. Any mounted reserve there may be should

be launched to the charge against the retiring enemy as soon as the

pursuing fire begins to cease to be effective. A victorious attack, on

the other hand, must make every endeavour to gain the position vacated

by the enemy, and to occupy ground from whence an effective pursuing

fire is possible. The bringing up of the led horses will be of special

importance in this case. If they are immobile, a portion of the men

must be sent to the rear to bring them up, while the remainder hold

the captured position. Any mounted reserves there may be can often be

employed to bring up at least a portion of the led horses. Generally

speaking, however, all troops not already engaged must, as we have

already shown, take up the strategic pursuit as early as possible. This

will supplement and complete the results of the tactical pursuit.

Never to let the enemy rest, even when the tactical pursuit has ceased,

to prevent him regaining his cohesion, to capture prisoners, horses,

and trophies, and, above all, to increase to the utmost the moral

effects of his defeat, is the task before us. The immediate pursuit

must therefore be combined, wherever possible, with a parallel pursuit

commenced in good time. The latter must nip in the bud every attempt

on the part of the retiring enemy to take up rearguard positions,

by turning such positions and pressing forward with reckless energy

against the actual lines of retreat. It must also endeavour to

anticipate the enemy in the occupation of any defiles necessary to his

retreat. At such times there must be no thought of sparing horseflesh.

Even in this pursuit, however, the commander must give a definite

object and a rallying point for the detachments following. He will

otherwise, by reason of rapidity of the movements in progress, risk

losing control of at least part of his troops, and of allowing them to

go farther than the strategical situation demands or admits. For the

rest, I may draw attention to the new Cavalry Drill Regulations, the

compressed instructions of which contain much that is essential and

coincide generally with my views.

Cavalry A Popular Edition of "Cavalry in War and Peace" · 第 52 / 65 题