2. _Reconnoitring Squadrons_

From the above considerations it must be already clear that a great

measure of resourcefulness, a comprehensive grasp of the situation,

clearness of judgment, and a love of responsibility will be demanded

from the leader of a reconnoitring squadron. Even in the simple advance

in the allotted zone, clear understanding will be required as to all

the measures for the proper conduct of the troops, and well-calculated

boldness when the enemy is met with.

There will, however, be difficulties to overcome when the main body

of our own cavalry changes its direction; when the concentration for

battle begins from the line of march, the cavalry masses draw away to

a flank, unexpected measures of the enemy come to light, which had not

been counted upon when our reconnaissance was arranged; or when our

own cavalry is beaten, and touch with it is completely lost. Under

all these circumstances the allotment of zones completely loses its

value, and the whole reconnaissance must be arranged and ordered on

some other system. Squadron leaders will often in such cases act quite

independently and according to their own judgment of the situation, and

with an appreciation of the probable action of neighbouring squadrons,

without, however, losing sight of the main objective. In such cases

they will often report direct to Head Quarters, and may then have to

fall back on the main army instead of on their own division.

Every squadron commander can conclude from these reflections what an

unusually high standard of military training, power of judgment, and

initiative will be demanded of him if he is properly and successfully

to carry out these duties. I hope that all officers will be stimulated

to apply themselves to these matters, so that a future war may not find

them unprepared.

It is a matter of the greatest importance for the conduct of the

squadron in general whether it is acting in a friendly or hostile

country. While in the first case troops may ride through towns, feed

in villages, and count upon considerable support from the inhabitants,

in the service both of security and information, in the second they

must always be prepared against treachery or surprise, and behave as

if they were surrounded by a network of spies. Townships are to be

particularly avoided, and special precautions for safety must be taken,

especially while at rest.

In other respects the advance itself must in both cases be carried out

according to the same principles.

Squadrons will generally advance by successive stages, and upon those

roads which appear to them to be the most important for reconnaissance.

If they are provided with the light-signal apparatus, and can use

it for communicating to the rear, they must keep in mind during the

march itself the possibilities of being able to use it, try it on the

ground, and make a mental note of points that are specially adapted for

connection-stations. The whole plan of the day's march must then be

made with an eye to the establishment of communication by this method.

Halting-places for rest or feeding horses must be selected with regard

either to good cover or to the view which may be had from them. In

order to be independent of the hostile population, it is advisable for

the squadron to have its ration and forage wagons with it. In case of

an unsuccessful collision with the enemy these may indeed be lost. In

any other case, however, they will always be at the disposal of the

squadron. On the other hand, in hostile country, if they follow the

squadron at too great a distance, they will often fall a prey to the

enemy. Under such circumstances, if they are to be really protected, a

sufficiently strong escort must be left with them, and this will react

unfavourably upon the strength of the squadron.

The efforts of reconnoitring squadrons to diminish the distance

between themselves and the enemy as quickly as possible by undertaking

excessive marches, such as are frequently seen in peace, are

misdirected and unreal, and only tend to wear out the horses. In

peace manoeuvres, which only last two or three days, and which have

not to be sustained by a number of lame and over-tired horses, such

proceedings are indeed possible, but in war they are pernicious. A

squadron should be able to remain up to strength throughout a campaign,

and it must be remembered that horses that go lame and are left behind

will, at all events in hostile country, be lost to the reconnoitring

squadrons for good. The patrols, too, must be able to keep something

in hand. But, if the squadrons tax their capacity for marching to the

utmost, the patrols, which are required to go still farther in advance,

must be completely exhausted. If the squadrons can cover daily 25 miles

and the distant patrols 35 to 40 miles, this will, I hold, be quite

sufficient. More than this, on an average, cannot be expected of them.

This does not of course preclude special efforts to meet particular

circumstances. It will only be possible, however, to demand these

efforts when we learn how to calculate the average length of march

during which men and horses can be kept fresh and efficient.

Although the choice of lines of advance and the combined action of the

reconnoitring squadrons are often weighty factors of success, yet on

the other hand, in order to obtain early and sufficient intelligence

of the enemy, it is of the highest importance that the patrol system

should be properly ordered according to the needs and probabilities

of the situation. The "Field Service Manual" gives the necessary

principles for their action. They must, it says, be sent forward along

the roads that the enemy is most likely to use. By so doing, certain

results must, under any circumstances, be obtained. On the other hand,

it is a mistake to send forward single patrols against a wide front.

Under such circumstances a patrol is always in doubt which way to

go, will probably divide, and cannot, at all events, be everywhere.

From such procedure, which is unfortunately only too common, reliable

results cannot be expected, and it is never certain if observation

is being carried out in any given direction. Such a faulty course of

action usually originates from a certain confusion of thought on the

part of the leader as to his own intentions and his suppositions as to

the enemy. A clear appreciation of the situation ensures at the same

time a clearly defined course of action. If, however, no sort of idea

can be formed as to what the enemy is likely to do, the patrol system

must be extended, not only in those directions from which the enemy

may be expected, but in others where it is possible that he may be met

with. Any turning movement on the part of the hostile forces must, in

this manner, be continually guarded against.

The number of patrols sent out will, of course, depend on the

importance of the task. If the strength of a squadron is insufficient

to provide them, it must be supplemented by patrols detailed from other

squadrons. The relief of such patrols, also, may have to be carried out

by the same means. Cutting down the number of distant patrols is to be

avoided as far as possible. Economy of force can be better obtained by

careful husbanding of strength in the close reconnaissance and service

of security.

The strength of distant patrols should never be arbitrarily laid

down, as in this respect also the circumstances must be taken into

account. Patrols which are far distant from the road upon which the

squadron is advancing, and which can only be reached with difficulty,

require a greater degree of independence than those in the immediate

neighbourhood, which can be rapidly supported or strengthened. The

probability, also, of meeting with superior hostile force demands a

greater proportion of strength. Under certain circumstances a whole

troop may be used as an independent patrol. At the same time a wise

economy of force must be practised so that the fighting and marching

efficiency of the squadron does not suffer too much. To this end,

quite weak patrols must be made to suffice in directions of secondary

importance. A second in command must be detailed to every patrol. There

should also be a supply of trained lance-corporals ready to lead such

patrols as may be required to carry information to the rear.

The strength of patrols will depend largely on the number of messages

that they are expected to send in. As a general rule, in large

operations, not more than two messages will be required from each

patrol during the day. It is only when the opposing armies approach

each other, and the distant patrols gradually become close patrols,

that it will be necessary to report frequently on tactical events.

The distances, however, will then have so far diminished, that a

reinforcement of the patrols from the squadrons would probably be

possible if they have become over-weak through transmission duties.

Like the reconnoitring squadrons, the patrols require relief from time

to time, as the same patrol leader cannot be expected to remain in

continuous touch with the enemy.

The strength of patrols, therefore, will generally have to be

calculated according to the number of messages and the number of days

during which the same men are required to be in contact with the

enemy. It is only when a special fighting strength appears necessary

that these numbers should be exceeded. On the other hand, the patrols

in friendly country may be made weaker than when in the enemy's

territory, as, in the latter case, it will scarcely be possible to send

in messages by single orderlies.

Careful preparation must be made for the relief of patrols. Every

patrol that is sent out must know when, and approximately where, it can

rejoin the squadron. The relieving patrol should arrive on the field of

exploration before the original patrol returns. The two patrol leaders

should meet where possible. All the patrols should never be relieved

at one time, as such a procedure would tend to weaken the squadron too

much.

The reconnoitring squadron must continually endeavour to maintain

communication with the distant patrols which send in reports to it.

As the main body must always be careful to render communication with

the reconnoitring squadron possible and to facilitate it, so is

communication with the patrols one of the most important duties of the

latter. It will often be necessary, when the distances become great

or the ground difficult, to push forward relay posts to facilitate

and accelerate the service of transmission. These posts must have a

sufficiency of force assigned to them. The squadron leader, further,

must most minutely instruct the patrols in anything that can serve to

assist the carrying out of their task, and as to all arrangements for

the transmission of reports.

A patrol's instructions must be short and clear, and must leave no room

for doubt in the patrol leader's mind as to what is expected of him.

The instructions must contain: all that is known of the enemy;

a statement of the general situation, and of the system of

reconnaissance, as far as it may concern the patrol in question; an

indication of the proposed march and the objective of the squadron;

points where messages as to the position of the squadron may be

deposited, in case it should be found necessary to depart from the

preconceived plan; exact data as to when and where the relieving patrol

will be sent and also when the patrol is to rejoin the squadron.

Although such arrangements may not always have the desired results,

as all such dispositions are liable to be disturbed by the action of

the enemy, they yet form a good groundwork on which to build further,

according to circumstances, and which can be suited to any alteration

of the situation. Such arrangements should therefore never be neglected.

In manoeuvres, the leaving of such information--for instance, under

stones--in prearranged places or localities that are easy to find,

and which must be determined by the map according to the expected

situation, will be found a valuable exercise.

Communication will, as a rule, be best secured if the reconnoitring

squadron can succeed in beating the hostile organs of reconnaissance

and security. We must not, of course, assume that a squadron that has

been thrown back and pursued for a space will be rendered incapable

of carrying out its rôle. It will still try to support its patrols

as before. If, however, such successful combats become numerous, a

superiority will at length be obtained, particularly on the main

avenues of communication, that will considerably facilitate the task of

obtaining and transmitting information.

It must therefore be the ceaseless endeavour of the cavalry to attack

the enemy wherever found. The reconnoitring squadrons in particular

must undertake the duty, not only of driving the corresponding hostile

squadrons from the field, but of endeavouring to intervene and

assist wherever the hostile reconnoitring patrols offer an obstinate

resistance. They must take every opportunity of fighting with the _arme

blanche_, or of attacking the enemy in some unfavourable situation,

perhaps by night. Dismounted action for single squadrons advancing in

hostile country is generally dangerous, and, on account of the weakness

of the force, usually leads to failure. It should never be forgotten

that for a successful action on foot great numerical superiority is

indispensable.

Should the reconnoitring squadron come in contact with the enemy's

cavalry in strength, it must be decided whether to fall back, or

avoid it by a détour in order to maintain under all circumstances

communication with the distant patrols. In the latter case,

communication to the rear becomes naturally considerably more

difficult, and it can only be hoped that the hostile cavalry will be

beaten by our own. Whatever decision is made will depend upon the

circumstances of the case: the terrain, the distance from our own

cavalry and from the enemy's main body, as well as on what is already

known of the enemy, and on what it is of particular importance to

learn. It will generally be most important, as well as desirable, to

maintain at all costs communication with the distant patrols, as news

must first be procured before it can be sent back, and it will be

possible under certain circumstances to communicate over the enemy's

head with the light-signal.

In order to maintain the necessary fighting strength of the squadrons

under all circumstances, as few men as possible should be detached.

This does not of course refer to the distant patrols.

The melting away of the squadron's numbers, so often seen in peace, is

generally a result of the manner in which the close reconnaissance

is conducted. The close patrols are sent out 6 or 7 miles, often

still farther, and, having general instructions to remain in touch

with the enemy, seldom rejoin the squadron. Thus they become lost

to the squadron, and as the squadron leader is not fully aware of

their position he is soon under the obligation of having to send out

a fresh patrol. This patrol is a less useful one than the first,

and if it brings in news of the enemy the latter will often arrive

simultaneously with the news. The report often enough goes first to the

enemy about whom it is being made. No reproach can be attached to any

one concerned. It lies in the nature of things and in the method of

apportioning duties.

In contradistinction to such procedure, it is, in my opinion, in most

cases quite superfluous to arrange a close reconnaissance in addition

to the distant patrols. Close patrols weaken the squadron, and can

only, it appears, rejoin it with difficulty, nor do they effect the

necessary reconnaissance. Every squadron must, on the other hand, be

continually surrounded by local patrols for its own safety, closely

connected with it, and which, being in constant communication with the

squadron, secure it immediately from surprise and, as far as their

strength allows, attack and break up hostile patrols. This measure will

not have the effect of weakening the squadron too much. These patrols

will require relief from time to time, and accompany the march of the

squadron in its rayon in such a manner that a second patrol can be sent

out before the first rejoins. They must, however, never be drawn so far

away from the squadron that they cannot secure its immediate safety and

beat off hostile patrols.

If, in exceptional circumstances, patrols are sent out in close

reconnaissance, it is desirable that they should work from one locality

to another a few miles in advance, so that it will always be possible

to get them back. Especial attention must be given to this matter when

operating in the enemy's country.

Patrols to connect with neighbouring squadrons are quite superfluous.

They have little prospect of carrying out their task in a practical

way, and must therefore be regarded as a useless expenditure of force.

The regulation of the movements of the various reconnoitring squadrons

as a whole, and the dissemination of information regarding them to each

other, is a matter for the Head Quarters of the main body.

Economy in patrols should never go so far as to allow of cyclists, or

indeed a single cyclist or motor-car, being used for reconnaissance,

as unfortunately repeatedly happens in manoeuvres. Cyclists may be

used for the purpose of maintaining communication and bringing back

reports. It will not be possible to use them singly for these duties,

especially in the enemy's country, but several will have to be sent

together. Bound as they are to the roads, they are quite unsuited to

patrol work. It is also inadmissible, at all events in hostile country,

to send bicycles or motor-cars with patrols. They only become a burden

to the patrol as soon as it wishes to leave the road. For the motor

cyclist the question of petrol is also an important one. Where will he

replenish his supply in hostile country? Certainly not in villages with

a hostile population, unless a sufficient show of force can be made.

The accommodation of reconnoitring squadrons for the night also demands

close attention. Such accommodation must be chosen from quite different

considerations, according as the squadron is operating in a friendly

or hostile country.

In any case, endeavour must be made so to dispose the squadron that the

chief avenues of communication, at least, will be under observation,

and thus closed to the enemy's despatch-riders. The horses also must

be rested, that they may be ready for the next day's work, for a tired

squadron cannot reconnoitre properly. In order that the horses may

really rest, they must be off-saddled, and, to do this, the squadron

must be secure from surprise. This will not always be possible, but

endeavours must be made towards that end. Should hostile detachments

be in the neighbourhood, which is unavoidable during critical days, it

will be necessary to be always ready for possible surprise, and to so

arrange that the squadron can speedily withdraw from its bivouac on the

approach of the enemy. The measures taken for safety must be directed

to this end. It is also sometimes desirable, in order to deceive the

enemy, to change the halting-place already occupied, after darkness

sets in. In friendly country, if an attack is expected, it is often

better to spend the night in larger villages, where the inhabitants

themselves will co-operate in the service of security. In the enemy's

country, on the other hand--where the hostility of the inhabitants

is to be reckoned with--the larger villages must always be avoided,

and accommodation must be sought in single isolated farms, which,

by their position, are in a measure secure from surprise, where the

fighting force can be kept together, where there is nothing to fear

from the inhabitants, and which can be quickly abandoned, if possible,

unobserved.

The service of security in such situations must be carefully organised

and must not consist merely of guarding the immediate environs. It

will rather be advisable to push forward posts on the chief lines of

approach of the enemy, which will be able to bring in timely news of

his advance. What degree of readiness for movement is maintained in

such situations the circumstances of the moment must dictate.

In this question of accommodation, attention must also be paid to

the service of communication. It must be possible from the position

selected for the night to pick up communication with our own troops and

to receive the orders and instructions which will naturally be expected

at the end of the day.

If the squadron is provided with the light-signal apparatus it should

remain in the neighbourhood of high ground, from which it is thought

possible that communication may be picked up. If instructions have been

received to establish communication by mounted orderlies or cyclists,

care must be taken that there are roads easily found, even in the dark,

by which they can reach the main body, the reporting centre, or the

relay posts, as the case may be. The squadron's own reports, too, will

often not be sent off before evening, in order that all the events of

the day may be collated. This must be done in clear, concise form,

more especially where the means of transmission is the telegraph or

light-signal.

The sifting and collating of information received is therefore an

important and very responsible task, requiring continual practice. The

squadron leader must be able properly to judge which of the reports

received must be sent to the army Head Quarters or to the cavalry

commander, and all superfluous matter must be eliminated. All reports

received should by no means be transmitted. This would overburden the

service of transmission to no useful purpose.

Cavalry A Popular Edition of "Cavalry in War and Peace" · 第 37 / 65 题