those planted recently. This year they have a fair crop. The catkins
came thru the winter in good shape for the most part. My two European
filberts, which have lost their identity, but are either Italian Red,
Cosford, or Medium Long, (one of the three perished) usually suffer the
loss of their catkins and occasionally lose a branch or two to
winter's icy fingers.
To me, the filberts are fascinating at all times of the year. When the
snow is deep and the cold bites deep, their tight little catkins always
hold forth the comfortable promise of spring. When spring does come the
thrill of the tiny red blossoms and lumbering catkins is as real and
enduring as the promise of a crop of the shiny nuts is fickle. Then, of
course, after the last tiny blossom has faded and the last catkin has
withered, the leaves push forth. To me, these tiny leaves are a sight
comparable to the opening and unfurling of the various varieties of the
grape. Then enters the element of suspense, between the time of leafing
out and the time when the little nut clusters appear.
My bushes are all growing together on a rise of ground near an old barn
foundation. The ground is rich and they love it. Each bush is individual
and distinctive as are their nuts--some tucked far in the husk, some
bulging out in a precarious fashion, some fat and round, others long and
narrow. They're interesting. I can let the butternuts, bitternuts and
hickories pass, the heartnuts, chestnuts, and pecans can wait until I am
sure they will bear here. The walnut will grow up along with the other
trees--blending into the landscape, but the filberts, like Zombie, call
attention to themselves every day of the year.
Somebody said recently that the emphasis in England is in being, and in
our country in becoming. I imagine our land stopped being with the
disappearance of the Indian and the primeval forest and is now in the
process of becoming something else. What that something else is we don't
know, and each generation carries a new set of values, but we all know
that to become something better, trees must and will figure in the plans
of all generations--better and more useful and more disease resistant
trees. It is significant that nut trees lead in these requirements.
Biology, Distribution and Control of the Walnut Husk Maggot
DR. F. L. GAMBRELL, _New York State Agricultural Experiment Station,
Geneva, N. Y._
DR. GAMBRELL: Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, some 22 years ago, I
believe it was, I attended one of your meetings at the Experiment
Station in Geneva, and at that time I gave a little talk on the walnut
husk maggot. Perhaps some of you are old enough to have been there and
remembered something about it, or maybe you are old enough so that you
have forgotten as much as I have, so it would be worth talking over
again. At any rate, when the chairman of your program committee wrote
Dr. Chapman, asking him if he might talk, he came to me and said, "Would
you be willing to do this?" I said I'd be willing but I didn't know
whether I'd be able. But finally, the pressure was so great that I said
yes, and I am here.
After I accepted the invitation, I made up my mind that I would like to
bring myself up to date as much as possible on recent developments on
walnuts, so I took the liberty of writing to a lot of our entomological
colleagues and talking to one of your members, Mr. Slate, in the hope
that I might get some more recent information on the maggots, or,
particularly, the control of this walnut husk maggot. I wrote to some 10
or 15 entomologists in 15 states, as well as the United States
Department of Agriculture in Washington and to our neighbors on the
north in Ottawa. I must say that I have had a very fine response from
everybody. They were all very willing to help, but practically all of
them had the same answer: while they knew there was such a bug, they
didn't know too much about it as an economic pest. So that left us all
right in the same boat, with about two exceptions, as when we began. Our
friends to the north in Canada sent some very nice information. We also
had some information from the U. S. Bureau of Entomology and Plant
Quarantine, Washington, D. C., together with some illustrated material.
Also our good friend, Dr. Boyce, at the Citrus Experiment Station, in
Riverside, California, with whom I have discussed the walnut husk maggot
problem quite a few years ago, had a very nice bit of information and
illustrative material which he provided. Incidentally, he is the man who
has been mainly responsible for the development of the walnut husk fly
control program for the nut industry in California. I would certainly
like to take this opportunity to acknowledge any contributions he or the
other people have made towards this discussion.
In New York State we have in our official list of insects about 30
species of fruit flies that are catalogued, but only about five of these
can be classified as of economic importance. Two of these occur on the
cherries, both sweets and sours, and are called the cherry maggots.
Another one on apples, known as apple maggot, and a related form on
blueberry. And then, of course, the walnut husk maggot, and one other
which occasionally occurs on currants, but this one, of course, is of
less importance than the others.
The fruit industry, of course, in New York is quite large, both apples
and cherries, so that there is a considerable problem there as far as
control is concerned. The growers spend thousands of dollars every year
in combatting the various species of fruit flies. The interesting thing
in this connection is that throughout the last 25 years with which I am
familiar with the cherry fruit flies--in fact, that was one of the first
projects I worked on in cooperation with Dr. Hugh Glasgow when I came to
the Experiment Station in 1925--the control measures which we developed
in 1925 to 1927 are essentially the ones which we are still using today;
that is, for the most part. There have been various attempts to change
the control program through the introduction of these newer
insecticides, and some progress has been made, but in every case they
have been wrought with some difficulties. At the present time the
official state recommendations for the control of apple maggot and
cherry maggot still include the use of arsenate of lead under some
conditions. I mention that at this point because it is of some
significance in the overall control. I am going to discuss that later
on.
As far as the host plants and distribution of the walnut husk maggot is
concerned, according to the original description which was published
almost a hundred years ago, it was listed as occurring in and to the
Middle States. That is a little bit indefinite, but at least it occurs
all over the Eastern United States and as far west as Kansas. Then the
one which occurs in California, which has since been called _Rhagoletis
completus_ (?) looks very similar to the one that we have here, but
there are slight taxonomic differences, so at least it is considered a
different species. At any rate, it is very similar to the one we have
here, and this whole group of fruit flies that we have been talking
about have a lot of similarity in their wing patterns and things of that
sort.
And the fact that I mentioned the control as generally as I did is of
significance in that all of these flies of the various species are
apparently susceptible to the same type of control measure.
As far as the host plants are concerned, I have personally observed
injury on all of our common _Juglans_ species that I have run across in
New York State and in some of the states to the south of us, including
butternut, Japanese walnut, English walnut and black walnut. I have seen
reports of infestations which were recorded in hickory, but I personally
have not seen them.
I'd just like to have a show of hands. How many in the audience here
have had experience with the walnut husk maggot or had injury on the
fruit? (Showing of hands.) I see the majority of you certainly know what
it is, but just as a brief reminder, the type of injury, of course,
varies somewhat depending possibly on the variety and time of year at
which the fruits first become infested. We know, of course, that the
flies do not begin to puncture the husk until they attain a certain
degree of softness. Early in the season they are not able, apparently,
to penetrate the husk with the ovipositor, and that, of course, varies
not only with hardness but with varieties. The flies, of course, may be
seen on the fruit even though they are not able to penetrate the husk
and deposit their eggs. These husks, of course, many of them, become dry
and hard after they have been tunnelled out, and it is almost impossible
to clean the shells. Occasionally you have nuts in which you have a
separation of the suture, and in those cases you very frequently get the
exudate from the husk penetrating through the suture in the shell onto
the kernels themselves, and in those cases molds may grow on the kernels
so that those fruits are no good.
In connection with this injury I am going to show you some slides in a
few minutes, but the preceding speaker made reference to a type of
injury which occurred on the terminal growth of a walnut tree and that
is one that we have had a lot of inquiries at the Experiment Station
about, injury to the new terminal growth fairly early in the season.
That probably, in most cases, is caused by the butternut or the walnut
curculio. Early in the season these adults begin feeding on the new
terminal growth, and they even puncture the new growth and lay their
eggs there before the nuts are large enough for them to attack and very
often considerable killing back of the terminal growth occurs. I have
seen it on English walnut seedlings in nursery rows where there would be
very large kill-back from the walnut curculio. Superficially the injury
on the fruit is quite similar to that of the husk maggot.
(First slide.) This first slide is just to give you some idea of the
general areas of fruit growing and distribution in New York State. The
eastern section, right-hand side, Champlain Valley and Hudson Valley,
are primarily apple maggot regions. Some walnut husk fly probably occurs
there, but they are predominantly apple-growing areas. In the central
part of the state, northern, particularly, we have fruit, and as far as
I know, there are no plantings of walnuts there, though you people may
know of some. In The Ontario Plains section south of Lake Ontario is one
of our big fruit belts in the State. Some walnuts are also grown here.
Consequently this area has in it apple, walnut and cherry maggot flies,
and, of course, they will be lapping over in all those areas into
surrounding territories. But this gives you an idea, in a general way,
of the distribution of the host plants and the flies about which I have
been speaking.
(Next slide.) Those flies get pretty big when you get them up there.
They are not that easy to see in the field. The ones on the top are the
species found on cherries. The one on the lower left is the apple
maggot, the one on the lower right is walnut husk maggot. The only
difference you can see here is in the wing pattern but in nature they
differ in color. They all have a little different wing pattern. Also,
there is a little difference in size, the walnut husk maggot being the
biggest of the four species shown here.
(Next slide.) I have shown here the emergence date of the various
species, including the cherry fruit flies, the apple maggot and the
walnut husk fly. And you notice that beginning over about the first week
in June you have emergence of the cherry fruit flies, and you have a
continuance of emergence of some of these species up until at least the
first or second week in August. These points going up and down just show
the number of flies that were taken on given dates, and there is a very
definite correlation between the proportion of flies that emerge on any
given day with the temperature or moisture condition. Some years, when
you have very hot, dry weather, there is considerable mortality of these
flies as they just do not seem to be able to emerge from the soil, which
is a good thing.
(Next slide.) This photograph is one that I wasn't sure I was going to
get back in time for the meeting, but it is a Kodachrome of a pair of
flies mating on an English walnut. This happened to occur on some of our
own trees at the station, so that we are not immune from attack by this
bug.
(Next slide.) That is a close-up of an egg puncture, just a very tiny
little hole in the husk, and once in a while they lay an egg even on the
surface. Those eggs are quite small, about a millimeter in length and
about two-tenths of a millimeter in width, but the next slide will show
you that what they normally do is to put them inside that puncture in
groups. They vary quite a bit, but the average number of eggs is about
20 in each puncture. But that doesn't mean you won't have maybe four or
five different punctures on a given nut, so you may end up with at least
a hundred or more maggots in a shuck.
(Next slide.) And the next picture is a photograph of the same English
walnut taken about six or seven days later, showing the young maggots
that have just hatched out. What they will do, they will begin boring
in, and they will just radiate out in all directions into the shuck.
When they have gotten that far along, of course, there is no hope for
control.
(Next slide.) This slide is one taken when the maggots were almost
mature, showing the type of damage that you get.
(Next slide.) This is the resting stage, or the pupa, the one which
spends the winter in the soil and from which the flies emerge in New
York, at least in our section, beginning about July 15th and going
through up until August 15th.
(Next slide.) The one at the top is normal fruit. I mentioned a while
ago that this butternut curculio causes quite a bit of concern and also
spoke about its being in terminals. If you look carefully you see a very
definite hole here in the husk. That is where the adult punctured the
husk. It may have been a feeding puncture first and later an egg was
laid inside, and then you get the maggot or the grub of the curculio
developing in there, so that superficially that discoloration looks very
much like the walnut husk maggot. But in this case you may not find over
one or two maggots in a nut. And the other difference is that these
fruits which are attacked usually fall during July and August, whereas
the ones that have maggots in, many of them stick right on the trees and
don't come off at all.
(Next slide.) I have two or three slides just showing the variations in
the degree of injury on English walnuts from the point where you'd have
an egg puncture. The puncture was made on the other side of the nut, on
top here, and this is just the exudate running down around the nut which
dries and becomes black. But these walnuts up above show just a lot of
dark spots where the maggots are beginning to find their way through the
husk. I have with me some injured nuts similar to those shown on the
screen if you'd like to see them when I have finished my talk. They will
give you a little idea what maggot injury looks like.
(Next slide.) This is the same type of injury on butternut. Maybe you'd
have one egg puncture and as many as a hundred or 120 maggots inside the
shuck.
(Next slide.) This is a picture of maggot injury on black walnut. They
don't seem to like the black walnuts as well as they do the Persian
walnut and butternut.
(Next slide.) This is one of the hybrid English walnuts that is located
on the grounds at the Geneva Experiment Station. It's quite a large
tree. I don't know the name of it. Maybe you do, George.
MR. SLATE: It has no name.
DR. GAMBRELL: It's not very fruitful, anyway, is it? But it is also
susceptible to injury.
(Next slide.) This photograph was made quite a few years ago, and that
explains some of the lines around it, but at any rate, this pile of nuts
shows the damaged ones that came from one tree, and also the ones that
were not infested. In other words, about two-thirds of the nuts on that
particular tree had been infested with maggots.
(Next slide.) That's a close-up view and is the type of thing I was
trying to describe to you earlier where the shucks dry up and stick to
the nut so that you cannot remove them. Those on the left, of course,
would be absolutely no good for commercial purposes.
(Next slide.) Now, I suppose you are all interested in this matter of
control. Unfortunately, I must admit that I have not worked on the
walnut husk maggots very much in the last 15 or 20 years. You may recall
that we had a severe freeze back in 1933 or 1934, which took out quite a
lot of our Persian walnuts in Western New York, and only the hardier
trees remained. But prior to that time we had been getting numerous
complaints, from growers about injury from walnut husk maggots, and we
did some work at that time and also worked with the Farm Bureau people
in the counties where walnuts were grown fairly commonly. In many cases
these Persian walnuts were grown on fruit farms where they also have
apples and other fruits. So that in those cases it was not a difficult
problem to obtain control. We worked out a program whereby, say,
beginning about July the 20th to the 25th, at which time quite a few of
the flies would have emerged, if the orchardist, when he was going
through with his regular spray operation on his fruit trees, would give
his walnuts at least two applications at about two weeks intervals, he'd
cease to have a maggot problem. That pretty well solved it, as far as
they were concerned. But there were also these other plantings where
you'd have just a few trees, or possibly one tree in a back yard,
something of that sort, which is a little bit more difficult to control.
Dr. Glasgow and I found that on cherry maggot in the city, while a
material like lead arsenate is very effective in a commercial orchard,
it's very ineffective for just one little tree in your own back yard,
providing your neighbors have some trees and they don't spray them. The
reason is very obvious: the flies don't necessarily stay on the same
tree. They visit around from tree to tree, they feed on the surface of
the leaves or fruit. Therefore, it's possible for them to be over on
someone else's unsprayed tree and still come over and lay eggs in the
nuts of a sprayed walnut tree before being killed. So you can see that
such activity may create somewhat of a problem.
At any rate, the lead arsenate spray of three pounds to a hundred
gallons, with or without fungicides, has given good control in the past.
That No. 3 combination of lime sulphur and lead arsenate was used west
of Rochester here around Hilton where this grower had a commercial fruit
planting, but he also had a number of English walnuts. The year prior to
the time these trees were sprayed he had about 40 per cent of the nuts
infested, and the year these were sprayed the infestation dropped they
came down to about one percent. Notice the comment at the foot of the
table which states that the trees that were not treated the following
year went back up to 20 per cent of the nuts infested. There were about
20 per cent of the trees that had infestation. Of course, the flies
moved around enough that the trees became reinfested. It simply brings
out the point that unless you have a pretty good-sized planting, you are
going to have to spray pretty thoroughly in order to get control, and
also, if you only have one or two trees and you have a lot of
surrounding shrubbery and a lot of trees, it would be very wise to also
spray those, unless they are plums or peaches, which are quite
susceptible to arsenical injury. But most things would stand the
arsenate of lead, and it would be very desirable, wherever you can, to
spray surrounding trees and shrubs close to the walnuts themselves, and
in so doing you would get pretty effective control. It is quite possible
to use this control method and obtain over 80 per cent reduction in
infestation.
I am sorry to say I don't have any information on these newer materials,
like DDT, methoxychlor and parathion. You have probably read about all
of those in the magazines. Some of the men in our department have done
quite a bit of work with these insecticides on the apple maggot in the
Hudson Valley and in Western New York and they find, as I mentioned
earlier, while it's possible to obtain control of apple maggot, say,
with DDT, it requires much more frequent application. In that case, if
any of you are orchardists or follow the apple-growing insect problems
at all, the first application of the walnut maggot spray should go on at
about the time the last cover spray for the coddling moth goes on for
the first brood. That sounds a little involved, but from the calendar
point of view it would be about July 25th in Central or Western New
York. Normally, with us here the cherries are being harvested by about
July 15th, sometimes a little earlier, but at any rate, that's the time
the flies usually begin to emerge.
We have what we call a pre-oviposition period of about two weeks, during
which time the flies are not laying any eggs in the shucks and are
moving around feeding. Of course, that is the time you have to get this
spray material on, before they have punctured the nuts and deposited
eggs inside.
I think, unless there are questions, that's all I have to say.
A MEMBER: You recommend No. 3 to be used?
DR. GAMBRELL: Lead arsenate at 3 lbs./100 gallons and 2 gal. of lime
sulphur would be an effective insecticide-fungicide mixture. I have used
both the wettable sulphur and lime sulphur, as shown here, without any
injury to foliage. Sometimes, as you know, if it's real hot, like today,
sulphur could cause you a lot of foliage injury. Dr. MacDaniels will
certainly bear me out on that.
PRESIDENT BEST: Now I think Joe McDaniel has a little idea here he wants
to introduce at this time.
DR. MACDANIEL: I have been talking with Mr. Devitt. He is interested in
following up these Carpathian trees in Ontario and is willing to act as
our agent in securing seed nuts from some of the better selected trees.
As I understand it, this Association couldn't properly act as a sales
agency for them, but I believe there are some of the members who would
like to get these superior seed nuts of Ontario, and I would be willing
to take the names of persons who are interested in them, either for
their personal planting or for resale. Mr. Devitt thinks he can secure
the nuts at about 60 cents a pound from the owners who have these good
trees and deliver them to the United States at around a dollar a pound.
Anyone who is interested in that, see me or Spencer Chase during the
remainder of the meeting.
Panel Discussion: The Persian Walnut Situation
_Moderator_: S. B. CHASE; _Panel Members_: H. L. CRANE, GILBERT BECKER,
J. C. MCDANIEL, H. F. STOKE.
MR. CHASE: To introduce the subject, Lynn Tuttle sent a paper, and in
addition he sent a few slides. We won't give the paper, but we are going
to run through a few slides very hurriedly, because he took the trouble
to send them. I am going to read the captions off very quickly. (A
series of slides of Persian Walnut were shown).
The moderator isn't going to do anything other than ask for any
questions that you folks have on Carpathians at this time. I am going to
ask Dr. Crane to comment on this question: Are we going overboard
building up our varieties as we know them now? In other words, we have
selected four or five varieties that won a contest and our judges
selected them as best, and these are the only ones we are hearing about.
DR. CRANE: Mr. Moderator, I don't believe we are, provided that we
maintain high standards in the varieties distributed and tested. I feel
that when we select a variety we should select it because it is a good
nut, not that it's a world beater, for big size and thick, rough, rugged
shell that is not sealed, and which is of no value for human use or
consumption, excepting for firewood or fuel. Those big nuts won't fill.
The best nuts are of reasonably large size, well filled with a well
sealed shell and with a kernel that is sweet. Don't figure on selling
nuts that have bitter kernels to anybody else. We have nut varieties of
the Carpathians that are not going to go over because of the faults that
I have mentioned. I should say, too, that we do not know how widely a
variety is going to be adapted to different climates. If we select
rigidly for good, outstanding varieties that bear good nuts and good,
vigorous trees, we won't get too many.
MR. CHASE: That was one point I wanted brought out, that we are now just
in the preliminary stage of this Carpathian variety selection business.
Of the selections made some have been made by default, because there
weren't enough of other samples to compete with. On the other hand, the
several we have we all consider outstanding in some respect, or other,
and are of value as a beginning provided we bear in mind that we haven't
scratched the surface on Carpathian walnuts yet.
MR. STOKE: And let's not confine ourselves to Carpathian walnuts,
because Hanson is not Carpathian walnut, and that's an excellent nut.
MR. CHASE: Mr. Stoke, what is going to be NNGA's policy in trying to
give recommendations for the planting of Carpathian or Persian walnuts?
In other words, does it make any real difference whether it's a
Carpathian or whether it is not, as long as it has proved hardy and of
good quality?
MR. STOKE: We are dealing with Persian walnuts, and Carpathian happens
to be one class of Persian, and Broadview happens to be a Persian that
came from Russia, and Lancaster is one that came from somewhere in
Europe and landed up in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I would emphasize the
name Persian as the over all name. The Carpathian is merely a Persian
walnut which has been brought from the Carpathian mountains of Poland.
MR. BECKER: Last summer a group of nut growers went to Lee Sommers',
which is in the central part of Michigan. In the invitation to our nut
growers I said, "This is the only pure Carpathian orchard we know in
Michigan." That didn't set well with some of them and they took issue
with me. In answering this issue, I said that Mr. Sommers had planted
Carpathian Persian walnut seed that came from Poland direct. Many of us
have a mixture. Even Mr. Shessler has the Hanson and Jacobs and a number
of others. If he sells you seed, you are going to get it mixed. In a few
years we will have a job keeping pure Carpathian.
DR. MACDANIELS: Isn't it a matter of straight terminology? _Juglans
Regia_ is the Persian walnut. Carpathians are a regional strain of
_Juglans Regia_.
MR. CHASE: I think we all understand that.
MR. MACHOVINA: Can we speak of a Carpathian strain. Crath himself said
there were many. He even found walnuts growing in clusters like grapes.
DR. MACDANIELS: It would be a regional group of clones with a certain
origin not a strain in the genetic sense.
MR. STOKE: They are just Persian walnuts that happened to come from the
Carpathian region.
DR. CRANE: There is a little difference. I believe that in the northern
countries we have had more or less inbreeding and we could consider them
more nearly a line, not a strain, because of that. When the original
seed was introduced by Reverend Crath, probably each one of those lots
of nuts come from different trees, as a line, but, now this second
generation stuff that's coming along, it's just _Juglans Regia_. It's a
hardy Persian walnut.
MR. STOKE: I think I can offer a word of explanation of those growing in
clusters. I have no doubt that when the barbarians swept over the wall
centuries ago they brought Asiatic walnuts with them from as far as
Manchuria. They grew in clusters there like butternuts and heartnuts. No
doubt some of them reached Europe, and some of them may have hybridized
with the Persian, and I think really that's the answer.
DR. MACDANIELS: The same situation existed with peaches 20 years ago. We
had five geographical races of peaches that were more or less distinct.
With the exception of one, the Peento, they have all lost their identity
now because there has been no attempt to keep them distinct.
DR. CRANE: That's right.
MR. CHASE: Then we end up, there is no such thing as a Carpathian, it's
just a name for a hardy walnut that came from a certain region, that
distinguishes it from others.
MR. KEPLINGER: In my parents' old home in Eastern Germany in the
Bohemian mountains there is an English walnut tree that's 300 years old
and bears a hundred bushels of walnuts a year. They stand 40 below zero
there, too, and the nut cracks and hulls well. It has a record on
standing the cold, but there hasn't been any of them brought out here
and planted in this country, but they are there. I know they are there,
because they are on our estate.
DR. CRANE: Mr. Moderator, there is one remark that I want to make. Here
we are, the Northern Nut Growers Association, and yet we still use the
term, "English walnut," when we are talking about Carpathian walnut and
Persian walnut. This "English walnut" is the worst form of terminology
that can be used. England doesn't have any walnuts; they have never
grown any Persian walnuts or English walnuts, they haven't in the past
and they aren't today. They have a few trees but are in the same fix
that we are in the Northern Nut Growers Association; they are trying to
find a variety of Persian walnut that they can grow in England, and yet
here we call them English walnuts. They should be Persian walnuts, or
Chinese walnuts. We don't know where they came from. The best
authorities seem to think that they originated in Persia; others think
they originated in China, but the abundance of evidence is on Persia.
We want to get this thing kind of straight. They are all the same thing,
_Juglans Regia_.
MR. CLARKE: I'd like to make a suggestion. I don't know as you have any
authority or power to change, but the term _Juglans Regia_ means "royal
walnut." Why not work for the adoption of a name like that, and it will
include all of them.
DR. MACDANIEL: That's what they call them in France. This country has a
little complication; there is another Royal walnut, one of the hybrids
between the California black and the Eastern black.
DR. GRAVATT:-While we are talking about bringing English walnuts,
Persian walnuts, whatever you want to call them, from Europe, I want to
give a warning about a disease that is killing thousands of trees in
Southern France. Just recently I saw quite a few of them in France and
the edge of Italy. I don't know whether it's virus or what it is, but
it is certainly killing out the English walnuts there at a very rapid
rate, and I advise very strongly against introducing walnut seed, scions
and such, from those areas in France and Switzerland or other areas in
southern Europe where this disease is prevalent. We will know more later
about it, because quite a team of pathologists is working on it in
Europe.
MR. CHASE: Has anybody else got any comments about _Juglans Regia_? I am
afraid to say anything else.
DR. MACDANIEL: I will say that this Carpathian strain, of _Juglans
Regia_ is the first walnut of the Persian type that we have had for
Illinois. The Pomeroy, other Eastern strains and California varieties
have not survived very long in the climate of the state of Illinois. We
do know now that some of the Carpathian seedlings have been fruiting for
10 or 12 years and do show considerable promise there. I don't know
whether it will ever develop into a commercial industry but they are
worth growing.
MR. CHASE: Thank you. I'd like to ask George Slate what he knows about
the Northern Star Persian walnut. Very hardy, and so forth? I think
maybe the members might be interested in that.
MR. SLATE: Spencer asked me to find out about the North Star _Juglans
Regia_, which was advertised in the Flower Grower. I called up the local
nursery that was selling them, and they said they got their seeds from
some Pomeroy trees in the western part of the state. I guess they are
just _Juglans Regia_.
MR. STOKE: Down in Virginia we have Virginia Thin Shell purchased
sometimes one place and sometimes another.
MR. CHASE: The secretary's office had an inquiry from the executive
secretary of the American Nurserymen's Association wanting to know if
those claims could be substantiated. I couldn't say on the basis of what
information I had, and I so told him. Apparently they, through their
organization, have stopped further advertising of that strain under the
claims that they made for it.
MR. KORN: We find our public at large, not only our members, seem to be
fascinated by the fact that the Persian walnut can be grown in this
latitude. So in speaking to them about it, when I am speaking to our
members, I try to say Persian walnut, but when speaking to the public at
large, they don't know what I am talking about so I come out flatly and
say English walnut. I tell them that we can't expect to grow the
California type, but we have a hardier type coming from the Carpathian
mountains or Germany or Russia or Holland, that can be grown
successfully in this part of the country.
MR. CHASE: I think that's the only approach you can use.
MR. KORN: That's the one I use, and I think it quickly helps people to
understand what you are talking about, and doesn't get them confused. If
you talked to them about Persian walnuts, they wouldn't know what you
were talking about, but if you say English walnuts, immediately they
understand, or should, at least.
MR. CHASE: I believe Dr. Crane meant that in our inner sanctum he would
prefer _Juglans Regia_.
DR. CRANE: I would like to ask if there are any growers here who have
propagated the Persian walnut on Eastern black walnut, that is,
experienced any trouble with graft union failure on them.
MR. STOKE: I haven't.
DR. MACDANIEL: Mr. Oakes?
MR. OAKES: I haven't.
MR. CHASE: No graft union failure on _Regia_ and _Nigra_.
MR. STOKE: And my experience is they come in much quicker than on their
own roots as seedlings.
DR. CRANE: How old are your oldest grafts?
MR. OAKES: Put on in 1938?
DR. CRANE: That's 15 years.
MR. STOKE: I have them at least 20 years.
MR. BECKER: Mine are twenty.
DR. MACDANIEL: Mr. Moderator, I have in my brief case a translation of
the French book on walnut culture, and there is a section on root
stocks. This was a publication issued about 1941, and according to that
book, _Juglans Nigra_ is the best stock they have for general use in
France. They have reported no difficulty on this. A second one they were
trying of the American walnuts, with some promise, was _Juglans major_,
the Arizona black walnut.
DR. CRANE: The reason why I asked, as I reported in previous
meetings--they are having very serious difficulty in Oregon and in parts
of Washington with graft union trouble which is known as "black line."
All or practically all of the walnuts in both Oregon and California and
also what few are grown in Washington have been propagated on the
Northern California black walnut, _Juglans Hindsii_. No graft union
trouble evidence shows up before the tree has been grafted about 8
years, and then such cases are very rare. But after the trees or the
grafts attain an age of 15 years or more, graft union failures are
numerous. For three years now we have been making surveys in the State
of Oregon, and we have surveyed tree by tree, year after year, the same
orchards, the same trees, and our observations now go into the
thousands, and we find that this black line is a terrifically serious
thing. In some orchards 22 per cent of the trees will develop black line
in one year's time. So, you see, at that rate it would only take you
five or six years with a good bearing orchard until you wouldn't have
any.
DR. MACDANIEL: Is that always with the Franquettes?
DR. CRANE: That is not only true with Franquettes but also with other
varieties in California, even in Contra Costa County.
MR. STOKE: Where those trees are so grafted, does it tend to overgrow,
or just the opposite?
DR. CRANE: No, it appears much like our _Crenata-mollissima_ chestnut
graft union failure.
MR. STOKE: Is there a tendency for the top to be more vigorous, to have
more growth, or vice versa or is growth uniform?
DR. CRANE: It may be uniform. Depends somewhat on the varieties and the
seedlings. There may be some overgrowth or some outgrowth, but there is
only one test for it, and that is at the graft union. With an axe or
knife and you cut out a strip of bark across the union. It may look
absolutely perfect, but if there is a black line developed there that is
just like a lead pencil line between the stock and the scion, the tree
is on the way out. It's just a matter of time. Ultimately the bark
between the stock and scion will split, and you get infolding, just like
on the chestnut.
One of the reasons that they have propagated their trees on Northern
California black walnut was that they had the idea that the Northern
California produced a stronger, more vigorous seedling and that they
grew much faster than seedlings of the Persian walnut. And, furthermore,
somebody at some time circulated the idea that Northern California
walnuts were immune to infection by the mushroom root rot fungus. We
have surveyed thousands of trees of Persian on Persian roots, and we
have never found a single case of black line developing or graft union
failure as long as it's a Persian on Persian, and we find the same
percentage of infection from mushroom root rot fungus on Persian as on
Northern California black.
MR. CHASE: In other words, we should watch our stocks and perhaps try
out some _Regia_ on _Regia_?
DR. CRANE: That's right.
MR. CHASE: Now, folks, we could talk for a long time, but let me make
one request before we close our panel: I would be interested in
receiving from any member pictures, good, glossy photographs of the
newer Carpathian varieties so that we can perhaps publish them in the
newsletter and give some folks an opportunity to see what these nuts
look like. Some of the folks who never come to a meeting never see a
sample and just read about it. It's much better if we can show them a
picture now and then. So if you have some good pictures, or plan to take
some good pictures, remember, I'd like to have a copy.
TUESDAY EVENING BANQUET SESSION
PRESIDENT BEST: We will now hear from the Resolutions Committee, Mr.
Davidson.
MR. DAVIDSON: Before reading any resolutions, I have been asked to read
a letter that came to Mr. Chase dated August 16th of this year, from Dr.
W. C. Deming:
"Mr. Spencer B. Chase, Secretary, NNGA.
"My Dear Child and Grandchildren:" What a beautiful greeting, that.
"This is to let you know that your father and grandfather still
holds a house at this hospital and rejoices in your vitality and in
your coming convention but especially in the energy and ability of
your secretary who gets out those wonderful Nutshell letters which
are so stimulating to all nut growers.
"More than 20 years ago I planted an Italian chestnut tree on the
grounds of this hospital. The main trunk was killed by blight, but
many shoots have come and now it appears to be flourishing because
there are no other chestnut trees near. About that time I grafted
nut trees commercially in Westchester County, New York at the
Westchester Country Club, asking and getting $50 a day for my
services and material and never a kick. But I have forgotten the
results and the name of the beneficiaries. From my home in
Litchfield, Connecticut, my sister, aged 85, saved for me--that is,
saved from the squirrels--a double handful of nice chestnuts--no
other chestnut tree nearby--and three green walnuts, Carpathians.
Both were from my grafts.
"I shall never forget the NNGA and your splendid services. Ever
faithfully devoted, Dr. W. C. Deming."
A beautiful letter.
Now, then, the Resolutions Committee recommends that we send this
letter;
"Dear Dr. Deming:
"Once more we are happy to greet you and to wish you well. Today
the representatives of more than a thousand members of your thought
child, the Northern Nut Growers Association, are here gathered in
Rochester, New York, to carry on the work in which you had so large
a part in starting. It must be a source of great satisfaction to
you to be able to see so important a project which you helped to
start continuing and expanding fruitfully. We envy you.
"May your tribe increase. Affectionately, the Northern Nut Growers
Association."
Now, shall I go on with the rest of the resolutions, and perhaps you can
act on them all at once.
"_Be it Resolved_: That we hereby acknowledge our longstanding
indebtedness to the men of the United States Department of
Agriculture and of similar departments of the various states who
have so faithfully and efficiently upheld the work of this
Association. Without their loyal help, doubtless our efforts would
languish or suffer severely. It is such a spirit as theirs that
continues to make America the great pioneer it has always been."
"_Be it Resolved_: That the members of this Association acknowledge
with deep appreciation the outstanding' hospitality of the City of
Rochester at the hands of its representative Park Commissioner
Wilbur Wright, Dr. Roy B. Anthony, Mr. Harkness, and their helpers
who have done so much to make the visit of this organization not
only welcome but extremely enjoyable and informative. We shall
always remember Rochester's exceptional hospitality and its
generously free provision of so beautiful a meeting place. This is
sincerely appreciated."
"_Be it Resolved_: That this Association extends to Mr. George
Salzer, Mr. Victor Brook its thanks for their work which has
resulted in so pleasant and profitable a meeting here in Rochester;
also to many others due our thanks, to Dr. McKay for organizing a
splendid program, to Mrs. Negus for organizing the registration, to
Mrs. Gibbs and finally to our outstandingly efficient officers who
have so skillfully organized our work and the Association's
expansion."
"In order to correct a tendency toward increasing confusion arising
from the too great multiplicity of names and nut varieties, the
Resolutions Committee offers the following motion: We move that the
President be authorized to appoint a self-perpetuating Northern Nut
Growers Association Committee on Variety Nomenclature, and we
recommend to our members that they refer to this committee for its
official approval any new nut discoveries they may wish to name
and to propagate." That is in the form of a motion, which, I
believe, requires a second and some action.
PRESIDENT BEST: I think we had better act first on this motion of Mr.
Davidson's about this committee for naming of nuts, and then we can have
another motion to accept the resolutions. Is there a second to that
motion that we have a committee on nomenclature of nuts?
DR. MACDANIEL: Mr. President, I second that motion.
PRESIDENT BEST: Is there any discussion?
DR. CRANE: I wanted to suggest that the motion should provide that the
committee use the rules of nomenclature approved by the American
Pomological Society.
DR. MACDANIEL: I will accept that amendment, Mr. President.
(A vote was taken on the amendment, and was passed.)
MR. MACHOVINA: Is that a proposal to amend the by-laws of this
organization? It would, if it's a self-perpetuating committee.
MR. DAVIDSON: May I suggest you withdraw the word "self-perpetuating."
The idea, Mr. Best, was to make this a permanent committee, if possible.
That was the reason for putting that word in there, but if it is an
abridgment of the constitution, we don't want to do it, of course.
MR. KINTZEL: I'd like to know what the rules of nomenclature of the
American Pomological Society are.
DR. MACDANIEL: The rules cover about two pages. I can give you the gist
of it, I think. One provision is that the discoverer or introducer of a
new variety has the privilege of selecting a name for it. Another rule
is that it shall not duplicate a name given previously for a variety of
the same class of fruit or nut. The name should preferably be one word
or, at most, two words, without hyphens, without possessives. That a nut
not be named for a person without his permission during his lifetime.
That covers the meat of it.
MR. CHASE: Such a committee would give official status and recognition
to your discovery. I believe it would prevent, on a large scale, such
things as this Morning Star hardy English walnut. In other words, we'd
have a committee to examine a nut sample from your tree, anybody's tree,
pass on it and see that the name that you select meets the requirements
of this American Pomological Society's rules of nomenclature, which are
quite reasonable. I think it is an excellent step that we should take at
this time.
MR. CALDWELL: Mr. President. The variety we are using is not a variety,
it's a clone. Maybe we had better get together with taxonomists and
botanists. That's all they are, selections, they are not varieties, in
the botanical sense, even though the term has been badly misused by the
nut growers. I don't see why we should continue with mis-application of
a term just because somebody set up rules for application of names.
DR. CRANE: Mr. President, I want to get this straight. This Association
is talking about horticultural varieties, not botanical varieties. A
correct term for a horticultural variety is a clone.
The American Pomological Society is over a hundred years old, and they
have followed all types of experiences and usages, and they are up to
date, and we can't follow any better pattern than what the American
Pomological Society has done all down through the years. The Northern
Nut Growers Association would be the laughing stock of the world who are
in the know if they don't adopt the rules of nomenclature as set forth
by the American Pomological Society.
MR. SLATE: Mr. President, we already have a committee on Varieties and
Standards. I don't see why that committee can't be revived. If we set up
another committee by resolution, we are duplicating the work of that
committee, or overlapping. I'd like to see this matter referred to the
Committee on Varieties or Judging Standards and possibly report another
year. I am not in favor of setting up this committee at the present
time.
I would like to amend that motion to refer this matter to the present
Committee on Varieties and Judging Standards.
DR. MCKAY: Second that amendment.
DR. MACDANIELS: There is one other angle to this. The International
Committee on Nomenclature of Cultivated Plants, has during the past year
published a report. I think it would be only wise for us to delay our
action on this matter until our committee at least gets the opportunity
to study the suitability of this international code for nomenclature of
cultivated plants and see how it applies to our situation. In other
words, I am complete in accord with Mr. Slate's motion.
MR. DAVIDSON: I would suggest that we refer it to that committee and
think about it for another year.
(A vote was taken on the amendment, and it was passed.)
PRESIDENT BEST: The motion of the Resolutions Committee is now referred
to the Committee on Varieties and Judging Standards.
MR. STOKE: I move we proceed with the adoption of the resolutions that
were presented before the motion.
(Motion seconded and passed.)
PRESIDENT BEST: We'd like to hear from the Nominating Committee.
MR. SLATE: For president the Nominating Committee proposed R. B. Best. I
think he is about one of the best presidents we have ever had. For
vice-president Gilbert Becker of Michigan. For treasurer W. S. Clarke of
Pennsylvania, and for secretary, our very efficient and very effective
Spencer Chase of Tennessee.
PRESIDENT BEST: Are there further nominations?
A MEMBER: I move nominations be closed.
A MEMBER: Second the motion. (Motion passed.)
DR. CRANE: Mr. President, I move that the Secretary of the Association
be instructed to cast a unanimous ballot for the nominations made by the
Nominating Committee. Seconded and passed.
PRESIDENT BEST: Is there any further business to come before the group?
Spencer Chase here has an item.
MR. CHASE: Now, for the feature of the evening, that honor which is
bestowed upon the most deserving member of the organization, I will call
on Mr. Wilkinson for the comments about the Big Nut. Mr. Wilkinson.
MR. WILKINSON: Four years ago at Beltsville, Maryland, Dr. Crane made a
suggestion that someone ought to be the King Nut of the Association. If
I remember, Mr. Stoke immediately took the floor and nominated Dr.
Crane, and he was unanimously elected the Big Nut. One year later he
bestowed that honor on Spencer B. Chase. The next year Mr. Chase passed
it on to Dr. Colby. One year ago Dr. Colby passed it on to me. Now it's
my duty to pass this on to someone else tonight.
Well, I didn't know just exactly how to do it, so I fell back on my
friend, Mrs. Negus for her suggestion. She suggested that the King Nut
should wear a crown, so I said, "Now, that's your suggestion; I will
leave it up to you." So here is the crown she made, with an ornament
from the Chief pecan, which in my opinion today is the king nut of the
Northern Nut Growers Association.
I don't know whose head she measured to make the crown, she didn't tell
me, but it looks to me like it would just about fit George Salzer.
(Applause.) George, it's a pleasure that I pass that on to you as I
received it, and I hope you will wear it for a year or longer (putting
crown on Mr. Salzer's head).
MR. SALZER: Well, they can't say I am big-headed. Why, honestly, folks,
my very good friends of the Association, honestly, I don't know what to
say. This is the greatest honor that I ever thought would come to me. I
always refer to myself as one of the buck privates in the rear rank, and
here I am the King Nut. I will assure you, every one of you that I
really appreciate this, I honestly do, right from the bottom of my
heart.
Ever since I have been a member of this organization and attended the
meetings, I have had the finest times, most pleasant associations and
the closest friends I ever had in my entire life right here among you
people. Thanks a million.
MR. CHASE: Now I think we are entitled to a few words from our new and
best president, Mr. Best.
PRESIDENT BEST: Ladies and gentlemen, it is quite a responsibility to
take this job on again. It's the first time that I have ever questioned
your judgment about anything, but I think there are other people here
that could have done the job better than I could.
When I was asked if I would accept if I were elected, I turned to my
wife, and I said, "Are you willing to do the work again for another
year?" and she said, "Yes, I suppose I'll have to." And I said, "Well,
then, I will accept." There is a lot more truth in that than there is
poetry. Honestly, we just don't give these officers that work for us
enough recognition. There is a whole page of them, as you know, about 11
committees, and all those folks have all done a fine job, at the expense
of their work at home. I am not talking about myself, because I don't do
any of it, I have it done, as I explained. But Carl Prell made a great
sacrifice when he handled the Northern Nut Growers business in a very,
very fine, thorough, business-like way.
I ought to give you a good example of what salesmanship really means and
how it operates. This morning Carl was going down to the museum in a
taxi. The taxi man professed an interest in nuts. Well, what did Carl
do? Did he say, "Well, that's all right, but I can't get into that?" No,
he said, "Man, you ought to belong to the Nut Growers Association. The
fact that you don't know anything about it, that's nothing. Come right
into the museum here, and I will show you the exhibits," and he took the
taxi man in, and I don't know whether he sold him a membership, but he
passed him on to the next man. He's got him going out to see
Irondequoit, and we, are going to get a sale there. That's the spirit
that it's going to take to get this job done.
I am reminded of a little story in Kipling. You know the story about the
sergeant in India. He was a sergeant in the cavalry. They had been out
in the hills, and the weather was hot, and they had an awful, awful
time. Well, when the men came in and lined up, this sergeant got off his
horse and he said, "Well, boys, I realize it's been hot, I know you
sweat. But," he said, "from here on in this campaign we are not going to
sweat, we are going to lather." That's what it's going to take to get
this 2,000 members that we have set for our goal. It's going to take a
lot of hard work, and our job is not to peer into the dim future, but to
attack those problems which are right with us every day and ask some of
our friends to join the Nut Growers Association. We are all widely
separated in different walks of life, and each in his own world is just
apt to see things a whole lot like the goldfish in a bowl. That is, he
will see it twisted and distorted. So when all is said and done, it's up
to us to support these committee heads and help get this job done.
A preacher had in his congregation an old lady who was ill. On one of
his visits to her she appeared to be growing weaker all the time, and
fearing the worst he said as he left her, "Well, sister, I suppose that
we will meet Up There." And she looked at him and she said,
"Well, Parson, it's up to you." So from here on out now it's up to you.
Thank you. (Applause.)
MR. CHASE: Now I think we ought to have just a brief word from Gilbert
Becker, our new vice-president. Mr. Becker.
MR. BECKER: This was really a great surprise to me. It is humbly I tell
you this, because I was on the Nominating Committee myself, and that is
a very embarrassing position to be in, to find that I, as a member of
Nominating Committee, appear as an officer. But it was a pleasant
surprise, and in doing vice-president work I shall try my best, and I
shall surely spend much time and much thought to it. Thank you.
(Applause.)
MR. CHASE: Now, Bill Clark, will you come up here for a few words? Bill
will succeed Carl Prell as Treasurer and handle your finances during the
coming year.
MR. CLARK: Friends, I thank you for this honor and that you should have
enough confidence in me to trust me with your funds for the coming year.
I will do the best I can, and thank you very much.
MR. CHASE: There will be a joint meeting of the new officers and old
officers immediately after we adjourn.
George Salzer says the last time we met in Rochester was 1922, and we
figure the next time we will be here is 1984.
(Whereupon, the meeting was adjourned.)
Walnuts in Lubec, Maine
RADCLIFFE B. PIKE, _University of New Hampshire, Durham, N. H._
In the 1930's, when the Wisconsin Horticultural Society distributed
seeds of the Carpathian Walnut from Poland, my brother secured some and
we planted them. From these nuts we now have four trees, one of which
has been bearing for the last four years.
Lubec, Maine is located at the extreme eastern tip of the United States
just a few miles south of the 45th parallel. The site where the trees
are planted is on a peninsula extending out into the Bay of Fundy which
gives very low summer temperatures and moderate winter temperatures. The
night temperature in the summer is usually in the 50 deg.s F. with day
temperatures rarely reaching 80 deg. F. Winter temperatures seldom go to
-10 deg. F. and only lower than this about once in ten years. During the
early summer, fogs are usually heavy and continuous. Day length is, of
course, longer in the summer than in most of the United States but it is
similar to that of the Northern tier of States from the Great Lakes
West.
The trees have grown well being about 18 feet tall and even more in
spread. They are multiple trunked having never been pruned. The foliage
is remarkably clean and glossy and has not been bothered by insects or
disease and it ripens and turns yellow in the late fall before killing
frosts at the end of October. Excessive late terminal growth is usually
winter-killed but this sort of growth has not been as great since
bearing started. The staminate flower buds are more likely to be winter
killed than the pistillate but the whole of them have never been
entirely killed.
The trees do not leaf out until mid-June, after the danger of killing
frosts is over. They have not been frost injured at any time in the
spring. The nuts ripen and are shed from the husks in late September and
early October while the tree is in full foliage. The nuts are shed
perfectly clean with husk either falling separately or remaining on the
tree. The nuts will germinate and seedlings have been raised. In 1953,
one tree bore 315 nuts. This number represents just a fraction of the
pistillate bloom, for while this tree is self fertile, the catkins bloom
for a much shorter period than the pistillate blossoms, the latter
extending over nearly a month.
In the same year that the above Carpathian variety of _Juglans regia_
was planted, my brother and I also planted some _Juglans mandshurica_
secured from F. L. Skinner of Dropmore, Manitoba which had originated in
Harbin, Manchuria. The resulting trees agree well with many of the
specimens in the Herbarium of the Arnold Arboretum at Boston labelled
_Juglans mandshurica_. These trees have done remarkably well in Lubec,
the trunks being 8-9 inches in diameter, while the height is 15 feet or
more and the spread 20 feet. They have borne annually since 1939. They
are planted less than 1000 feet from the ocean exposed to the summer
storms, winter gales and salt spray. These trees leaf-out a month
earlier than the Carpathians yet the foliage has only been partially
frost injured once. Wind whipping sometimes injures the leaves in early
summer while they are still tender but this sort of injury has never
been serious.
The nuts are borne in clusters of up to six and the shells are hard and
thick. The flavor of the kernels is excellent having more character than
the butternut yet not as strong as the black walnut. Cracking is easy
with the Hershey nut cracker. The kernels resemble our American
butternut in shape which may account for the fact that _J. mandshurica_
is sometimes called the Oriental butternut.
The nuts germinate well and make trees quickly. In one case, I had
mature nuts five years after planting the seed. This particular tree was
unusually vigorous having leaves 36 inches long and 23 inches wide.
In my experience, _J. regia_ and _J. mandshurica_ do not hybridize
easily if at all, at least with the individuals and under the conditions
with which I have been working. After several attempts I now have two
progenies of reciprocal crosses of which a few seedlings seem to show
hybridity in the vegetative parts. However, there is such a range of
characters in the herbarium specimens labelled _J. mandshurica_ that
there will be a doubt in my mind until I see the mature trees, or it may
be possible that some of the herbarium specimens may have been collected
from naturally occurring hybrids, as the two species overlap in their
distribution in Manchuria. If the best vegetative and fruiting
characters from these two species can be combined the result should be
good for our northern sections.
My Thirty Years Experience With Nut Trees
CARL WESCHCKE, _St. Paul, Minn._
From time to time I have submitted articles for our annual report, as
well as other publications, which had to do more or less specifically
with certain species of nut trees, but since there are so many species,
and since most nut growers are interested in at least two or more, it
might be well to bring the story up to date of how a nut orchard might
be viewed or evaluated after twenty years.
Thirty years ago we did not have knowledge which has been gained by the
experimenters in the nut growing industry in the interim. Therefore no
one could foresee what the future would be. We hopeful ones of that era
planted trees and experimented with seeds from all over the world
because we thought nut trees deserved a place not only in the orchard
but in the dietary needs of the human being as well. Many of the wisest
and most respected experimenters of this era have passed beyond this
life; however, their lives were made much more interesting because of
their horticultural activities.
Here in the midwest in the 45th parallel we have established probably
what would be considered the practical northern limits of nut tree
cultivation. When I purchased trees it was by the hundreds, and
sometimes thousands, because I knew from reading Luther Burbank's works
that this work had to be done on a rather large scale in order to make
any kind of an adequate test.
Let us start by taking the most obvious species, the black walnut,
which, because of its native hardiness, and public popularity might have
succeeded the best in a commercial way if everything had gone right. I
have planted at least five hundred black walnut trees altogether; these
included the Thomas, Ohio, Ten Eyck and Stabler, and later on the
Patterson, Rohwer, Pearl, the Throp, Adams and others were added. The
Ohio probably produced the first nuts, with the Thomas a close second.
For a few years I was able to make good reports on the Stabler and its
behavior but since that, our severe test winters of recent years have
wiped them out and have substantially proved that the only one of the
older varieties which can be trusted in this territory is the Ohio, and
although derogatory things have been said of the Ohio because of its
hull, I am inclined to put it high on the list because of its fine
cracking quality and excellent flavor, also it has been a prolific
variety, bearing good crops most of the years.
The Thomas grew faster, and the nuts were considered a better commercial
product when hulled, but, alas, it could not take our winters nearly so
well, and today the Thomas has a poor physical appearance although it
shows tremendous power of recovery and seldom a tree will die entirely.
The Ten Eyck was a negligible experiment, and the Stabler as mentioned
before, is much too tender for this climate. The Rohwer and the
Patterson from Iowa did much better and even in an off year, like this
one, some of these trees had fairly good crops. I like the Patterson the
best of these--it is a roundish nut that cracks quite well and the
kernels are on the sweet side.
The Throp was a curiosity and we did not have any of our grafted Throp
trees bear.
Pearl has borne several crops of good nuts; they are large but are
inclined not to ripen in time.
Vandersloot was considered the largest nut of any variety at one time.
It has a very rough appearance but aside from its size it is of no
particular interest as compared to others.
Adams, a long narrow type of nut similar to the Ohio, but still more
elongated, was one of the best crackers I have ever seen, but did not
seem to be prolific although it has lived and demonstrated its
hardiness.
I am patenting a new walnut at this time which I consider the best for
our locality. Some day it may produce well in orchard form if trees
become available. One thing is certain about it--it is very hardy and is
reasonably easy to propagate.
And so we can conclude the walnut chapter by saying that at least we
have some giants in the orchard to show for our trouble and expense,
which bear nice edible walnuts in favorable seasons. When comparing this
with the wild butternut crop from butternuts in the adjacent woods,
which has consistently failed each year for the last ten years, it is
quite encouraging.
It was my hard luck to have an uncongenial soil for my experiments in
chestnuts, and the knowledge of this came so late that I thought the
chestnut was not meant to succeed in our territory. So I put my efforts
on hickory nuts and filberts. Both of these succeeded to a degree and
with my present knowledge and experience on hickory nuts I would not be
a bit afraid to start an orchard on good deep clay or other
satisfactory soil which hickories like, using grafted trees of
Bridgewater and Weschcke.
A few Kirtland and Deveaux No. 2 would be planted for extra pollination
and the extra variety in nuts. There are of course many other varieties
of hickories that have succeeded in this territory but those above
mentioned, have possibilities of commercial success in orchard
formation.
The hickory is a difficult tree to transplant and I would advise that
grafted trees be dug with a ball of dirt for shipping, similar to an
evergreen, as I have found that, with the greatest of care and
experience, the hickory is very slow to re-establish itself unless
handled that way.
The hybrid hazels are perhaps the hardiest and certainly bear the
earliest of any of the nut trees. My own hybrids show great
possibilities for commercial enterprise, but as yet no nurserymen are
carrying these varieties and I have not found help enough to promote
them myself.
I am convinced that had I spent as much time with the chestnuts on
favorable soil as I did with hickories that they would probably head the
list of successful nut trees growing. Recently I have purchased an
adjoining piece of property which has the necessary well-drained, sandy
or gravelly soil, which chestnuts seem to like, and I have started my
chestnut orchard there along with a sprinkling of hickory and walnut
trees, merely as a matter of test.
This year the chestnuts are again putting on a fair crop for the number
and the size of the trees involved. As yet, in order to get a reasonable
number of nuts for planting, I have to cross-pollinize them by hand, and
I was surprised and pleased this year to find one Chinese chestnut tree
with staminate bloom, allowing me to make a cross pollinization with an
American sweet chestnut and a Chinquapin type chestnut, which grows to
be a tall tree. These crosses ought to insure trees with a great degree
of hardiness, and should the blight ever strike this territory in the
future they should be highly resistant as well. A few of my chestnut
trees produce nuts that may be the size of the best Chinese chestnuts,
but I am just as fond of the smaller and sweeter chestnuts of the
several Chinquapin type trees which seem to be consistent bearers and
certainly are prolific. There are three trees in a close group which are
strains of the European chestnut combined with American chestnut. These
bear rather large nuts and usually every year have a few and of high
quality. It is conceivable that by crossing this hybrid with Chinese
pollen that something unusual could be produced.
The pure Chinese strain has not proved hardy in this territory and I
have never matured a pure variety. However, there are dozens of
seedlings that are not old enough to prove whether there might be a
hardy specimen among them that may at some time in the future be relied
upon for this species of chestnut.
One other species of nut requires a little space here since it has shown
that it can bear crops and is hardy enough to be included among the
hardy nuts. It is the Gellatly heartnut. It is very subject to the
butternut curculio, but in spite of that it continues to grow quite well
when grafted on black walnut,--a difficult piece of propagation,
however. A tree in St. Paul, on the boulevard, thrives next to a large
butternut, and bears nuts practically every year which the squirrels
delight in cutting down while still green. This tree is not bothered by
the curculio since the curculio does not infest the large butternut near
it.
In summing up the whole situation, I would say that my experiments over
thirty years quite adequately prove that the walnuts, hickories, hybrid
hazels and chestnuts can most certainly be set out in orchard form and
in favorable locations. However, pecan, hiccan, English walnuts and
almonds have not proved hardy enough to indicate that they can be relied
upon for steady crops of nuts although in some instances varieties show
a great hardiness such as the Rockville hiccan. Of course the native
butternut is perfectly hardy and prolific but until such time as the
butternut curculio ceases to be a major pest we cannot expect to have
good crops of them.
Growing American Chestnuts and Their Hybrids Under Blight Conditions
ALFRED SZEGO, _Jackson Heights, N. Y._
An interesting group of young American chestnut trees growing on my land
near Pine Plains, N. Y. has been under observation since 1946. As they
are growing closely together which suggests a common parental origin, we
have named this group the "Dutchess Clone" for reference purposes. This
name was chosen merely because Pine Plains is situated in Dutchess
County.
Their reaction to the deadly chestnut blight was studied at great length
and at different seasons. Sometimes branches were inoculated with the
fungus to test resistance more precisely. It was learned that blight
resistance, in this group of trees, was at an apparently low ebb from
March until May. After this period the fungus seemed to make almost no
progress at all. This might suggest that the resistant substance was
manufactured by the leaves. Of course, such conclusions cannot be
accepted in a scientific sense without an involved system of checks and
measurements.
Pollination problems are exactly the same as with our Chinese Chestnuts
that we are more familiar with today. Unlike the latter, in the
American, species the bloom is concentrated near the top of the tree.
The burs are so high up as to create difficulties if we intend to
anticipate nature and harvest our crop prematurely. The burs open during
the month of October with or without frost. High temperatures in 1953
did not interfere with the harvest. The best method of harvesting is to
use a long slender pole with a metal hook at the extreme end, and by
gently pulling and twisting, remove the burs from the tree.
Unless this is done promptly before the nuts fall, the rodents will get
almost every nut.
Tree growth is about 2 to 3 feet per year in height. At present some are
nearly 40 feet tall. Bearing starts at about 12 years of age. The nuts,
three in a bur are somewhat wedge shaped and average 5/8 of an inch in
diameter. One tree has nuts almost an inch in diameter. This is
definitely worth propagating and I will gladly furnish scions in the
spring free to anyone who is interested. These are probably
incompatible with Chinese understocks, but may be grafted on European
and some Japanese seedlings.
As we are listed as cooperators with the U.S.D.A., Division of Forest
Pathology, Beltsville, Md., we prepare semi-annual reports for Dr.
Frederick H. Berry and also send a portion of our American chestnut seed
to him. In this way we insure the continuation of the "Dutchess" clone
after our lifetimes.
The American chestnut is not as sweet as Chinese chestnut but is much
finer in texture and richer in subtle pleasing flavor. We would say that
the quality is higher. _Castanea dentata_ has the most uniformly
delicious nuts. It is excelled, however, by many individuals of _C.
pumila_. In our opinion these possess the highest quality nuts in the
entire genus.
Our American chestnuts hybrids, especially those with _C. Sequinii_, are
very interesting. The latter make a dwarf tree that bears incredible
amounts of small chestnuts. They have pollination problems to be solved
and the nuts are seldom filled. Pollen sterility is a common feature
with them. They are also everbearing.
Some Northern strains of Chinese chestnut seem barely hardy but promise
to survive. Of the grafted varieties we have, Abundance is the most
vigorous. "Nanking" has winter-killed here and it has been replanted
this year. These are very blight resistant, and rarely lose a branch to
this disease after winter injury. The Japanese behave in much the same
way.
We have many obscure chestnut species and hybrids growing here. They are
grown for study, hybridizing purposes, and as a source of supply to
interested members. When mature, we hope to obtain some cash crops from
our Chinese and Japanese Chestnut trees. Blight in Europe will no doubt,
in about 5 years more, reduce imports of chestnuts thus creating higher
prices and a more favorable market.
Chinese chestnuts do not keep well when stored using standard commercial
practices. European chestnuts are shipped in barrels and kept in open
fruit boxes for weeks at a time in front of fruit and vegetable stores
in New York City. Storekeepers never moisten these believing that rot
would result. These are viable even in January and sometimes as late as
March. Will our present Chinese chestnuts keep as well under these
conditions? We think not. American Chestnuts can be kept in bulk only.
We are continually striving to obtain by selection and subsequent
hybridization, the best chestnuts that can be grown in our severe
climate. The Chinese chestnut has performed miracles in the Southeast,
but we regret that it is not the answer to our problems. Only a long
period of seed selection will turn up better trees of this species.
Prolonged heat and drought caused us much concern this year. Some one
year old seedlings died outright but older trees only suffered varying
degrees of defoliation. In some areas, the subsoil was reported powder
dry to a depth of six feet. Even the native forest trees dropped much
foliage and went into premature dormancy. Oddly enough, the American and
Japanese chestnuts suffered much less defoliation than the common
Allegheny chinkapin, _C. pumila_. _C. henryi_, a rare species, a native
of China, and the several chinkapins native to the Gulf Coast seemed
inherently adjusted to drought and heat, and thrived without apparent
damage. The Ozark tree chinkapins did well also.
Hybrid hazels and choice native seedlings have been set out here in the
last few years. We are adding a few every year and planting them between
chestnuts to prevent the latter from forming extensive root grafts. This
is done in anticipation of oak wilt, which has not yet made its
appearance here.
Experiences and Observations on Nut Growing in Central Texas
KAUFMAN FLORIDA, _Rotan, Texas_
In view of my membership in the Association for some twelve or fourteen
years it would be quite reasonable to expect of me more observations in
connection with nut growing in my area than I'm able to make. Though
I've followed the proceedings of NNGA with great interest, the
difficulty of earning a living (from farming) and putting a little
something aside has caused me to neglect and put off from year to year
the planting of the kind of experimental orchard I've long hoped for. I
have lately acquired a reasonably well situated plot of land and,
barring a continuation of the drouth of the past two or three years,
plan to put out a few young trees next year.
My original interest in nut trees sprang from the hope that a tree
combining beauty, utility and long-life might be found to replace the
Chinese elm--a "weed tree" if there ever was one. In spite of many
shortcomings the Chinese elm (along with two or three other equally
undesirable trees) is to be found in most homestead plantings in my
area.
Here, in my locality of north-west central Texas, the total rainfall
ranges from a low of about twelve inches in some years to a high of
about forty-two inches in others, and the annual average is about
twenty-one inches. Our principal limiting conditions in nut tree growing
is want of sufficient rainfall, though late spring frosts following a
period of balmy weather would be a hazard in some instances. It appears
to me that if a nut tree planting in this part of the country is to
live, every drop of water that falls must be conserved; if it is to
thrive, additional water falling on adjacent uplands and carried down in
flash floods must be diverted to it. Terraces and retainer dams are
usually essential. Cultivation and weed control are necessary. The
addition of a mulch helps.
I have tried the Chinese chestnut here. The plants arrived in good
condition and had excellent care with what I believe was adequate water
and fertile soil. They put out in April and grew off most encouragingly
until about July, and then, in an interval of about a week, every tree
withered and died as though from heat and drouth. But until other
evidence to the contrary comes in, I shall strongly suspect that the
real trouble was that the Chinese chestnut demands an acid soil and is
highly allergic to even a slight alkalinity. My impression is that the
soil here has a reading of about pH 7-7-1/2.
Experience and observation here on the western fringe of the native
pecan belt lead me to believe the pecan, black and Persian walnuts do
well when they can be irrigated, or when they are planted on a site
where a first class water conservation system can be devised and
properly constructed.
The black walnut has not been damaged by any insect, disease or mineral
deficiency of the soil that I know of. A very limited and inconclusive
experience with Clark, Thomas, Myers, Mintle, Sifford, Snyder and
Sparrow varieties led to the suggestion that the Thomas might be a
slightly more thrifty tree.
The pecan (both nut and tree) seems more subject to insect damage than
the walnut. It is also sensitive to a zinc deficiency in some soils. But
a proper mineral and insecticide spray usually serves to control these
problems when they occur.
I have observed only one named variety of Persian walnut--a Mayette. The
tree was a vigorous grower and precocious in putting on nutlets, but to
my knowledge never bore staminate blooms and over a period of several
years matured only one nut. No other Persian walnuts grew in the
locality and I assumed the matured nut must have been pollinized by a
black walnut. The tree never seemed damaged by late spring frosts or
other cause.
A few members of NNGA have manifested an interest in the honey locust
and the Chinese jujube. Both of these trees grow well in this region
with a minimum of care. The Oriental persimmon, like the nut trees,
requires more than casual attention and ordinary growing conditions.
The Chinese jujube, a little known but hardy and attractive tree may
deserve more attention in the southwest. I have trees of the Li and Lang
varieties which bear annually and have never been bothered by insects or
disease. I am not overly enthusiastic about the fruit but understand it
"compares favorably with the fig and date in food value. Dried jujubes
carry more protein than dried figs or dates and more (50%) sugar than
figs."--T.A.E.S. Bulletin no. 41. But the jujube has the disagreeable
habit of sending up root sprouts which are a nuisance to destroy and,
because the tree is grafted, the sprouts are worthless seedlings. It has
occurred to me that this bad feature of the jujube might be partly
offset if cuttings of the improved varieties could be made to grow by
means of some of the root inducing chemicals.
Propagation of the Hickories[1]
F. L. O'ROURKE, _Department of Horticulture, Michigan State College_
The genus _Carya_ comprises all the hickories and pecans found in the
United States. The eighth edition of Gray's Manual of Botany lists the
following species as being native to the United States:
[1] The survey of literature pertaining to this review was completed in
August, 1952.
_Carya aquatica_--Water hickory, Bitter Pecan
_Carya cordiformis_--Bitternut, Swamp Hickory
_Carya glabra_--Pignut
_Carya illinoensis_--Pecan
_Carya laciniosa_--Shellbark, Kingnut
_Carya ovalis_--Sweet Pignut, False Shagbark, Red Hickory
_Carya ovata_--Shagbark
_Carya pallida_--Pale Hickory
_Carya texana_--Black Hickory
_Carya tormentosa_ (C. alba)--Mockernut
Nut growers are interested primarily in the pecan and the shagbark,
although a few selections have been made of the shellbark species. The
bitternut is quite often used for rootstocks for the shagbark and
shagbark hybrids.
Hickories, like other nut and tree species, do not come true from seed,
so superior selected clones are propagated by budding and grafting on
other trees known as rootstocks. These rootstocks are produced from
seed.
Seed Propagation
Investigations by Barton(1) showed that some seedlings were produced
when the nuts were planted immediately in a warm greenhouse without
pretreatment, but that germination was markedly increased when the nuts
were held in a cool moist environment from one to four months before
bringing into the greenhouse. She also found that fall planting of
hickory nuts resulted in a good stand of seedlings the following spring
if the soil was mulched, but that the freezing and thawing of
unprotected ground resulted in an exceedingly poor stand of seedlings.
Burkett(6) advocated stratifying pecan seed over winter in moist sand
and planting in moist soil in the very early spring. He observed that
thin-shelled nuts germinate more quickly than thick-shelled ones, and
warned against "damping-off" fungi which often killed young seedlings.
Brison(5) stated that some nurserymen prefer seed of certain pecan
varieties as Riverside and Burkett for rootstock purposes as these
produce strong vigorous seedlings. He reported that while the pecan seed
does not have a rest period, germination is increased by stratifying in
moist sand for 2 to 3 weeks or soaking in water, changed daily, for 4 to
5 days previous to planting.
Propagation by Layering
No records are available in regard to any hickory species or variety
other than pecan having been propagated by any method of either soil or
air layering. The writer(14) while experimenting with aerial layering in
1945 found one instance of root production on a hickory where the branch
was girdled at the base of the one-year wood. This method offers
possibilities, especially now that polythene plastic is available for
retaining moisture in the moss about the girdle or wound on the layered
branch.
Gossard(9) reported success in producing roots from the tops of small
grafted and budded pecan trees by trench layering and from older trees
by aerial layering with marcot boxes. He indicated that a favorable
combination of etiolation, moisture, rooting medium, and a root-inducing
chemical was desirable for successful rooting.
Propagation by Cuttings
Hardwood cuttings of pecan were rooted by Stoutemyer and O'Rourke(23) in
1938 by first callusing the bases of the cuttings in warm moist peat
moss, and then treating with an aqueous solution of indole butyric acid
before planting. Both roots and shoots grew well for three to four weeks
and then the shoots wilted and died. It was observed that the roots were
thickened and presented an abnormal appearance. Trials during succeeding
years gave no better results and the experiments were discontinued.
Cuttings taken from native hickories during these same years failed to
produce roots.
Romberg(17) reported a small measure of success in rooting hardwood
stem cuttings to which young seedlings had been grafted by the inarch
method. The influence of the seedling on the nourishment of the cutting
was gradually diminished by girdling caused by a copper wire which was
tied about the seedling stem.
Apparently root cuttings of pecans and other hickories have never been
tried. In 1896 Corsa(7) observed that "when the lateral roots of the
pecan are broken by the plow, the ends of these roots frequently send up
thrifty shoots." Such a response would indicate that adventitious shoots
may arise from roots and that root cuttings may be successful.
Propagation by Grafting
A search of the literature failed to reveal a discussion of any method
of bench grafting with hickories, although presumably it must have been
tried. Propagators may have been discouraged in using bench graft
methods by the sparse roots usually found on two-year seedlings. It is
suggested that undercutting and root pruning the seedlings several times
while in the nursery row should produce a more adequate root system
which would transplant well after grafting. Brison(5) remarked that
bench grafting is not used in the propagation of pecans in Texas on
account of transplanting difficulties.
Commercial nurserymen now prefer to bud hickories and pecans rather than
to graft, but formerly Reed(15) reported the whip-and-tongue method was
used on thrifty one-year seedlings in the nursery row. It is conceivable
that the cleft graft could be used at this stage when the diameter of
stock and scion are quite similar but no record of its use is available.
Top-working or grafting in the branches is commonly practiced on
seedling trees and sometimes used to change varieties in the orchard.
Reed(15), Sitton(19), Rosborough et al(18), MacDaniels(11), and
Stoke(22) have described various methods that have proven successful.
Practically all agree that the bark graft or a modification thereof is
best. Morris(12), Benton(3), MacDaniels(11), Wilkinson(25), and others
have shown that a greater per cent of survival is secured when the
stocks are cut 10 days to 2 weeks before grafting. During this time the
stubs heal somewhat and excess bleeding is decreased. It has been
reported by Becker(2) that the success of walnut grafting is greater
when the grafts are set just after the leaves are full grown but no such
data is available for hickories. The use of paper bags or other shading
device over the scion is advocated by Morris(13), MacDaniels(11),
Shelton(20) and others.
Propagation by Budding
Patch budding is now almost universally used by commercial nurserymen in
the propagation of hickories and pecans. Patches are usually cut with a
double-bladed knife although some use the rectangular Jones
patch-budding tool. The "plate" or "skin" bud is also used to some
extent. The thick bark of hickories and pecans discourages the use of
the shield or "T" bud.
Budding is usually done in late summer with mature buds of the season
growth which remain dormant until the following spring. Occasionally
dormant budwood taken in winter is held in cold storage until the bark
of the stock slips in the spring. These spring-set buds are forced the
same season by cutting the stocks back shortly after setting.
Patch-budding is described by Reed(15) and by Rosborough et al(18).
Reed(15) mentioned that it may be advisable to make the cuts in the
stock from one to three weeks before the bark is removed so that the
healing process may be under way at the time the bud patch is inserted.
Storage and Handling of Scions and Budwood.
Shelton(20) reported an easy and unique method of keeping scions moist
by storing in a closed container with a small amount of sodium sulphate
(Glauber's salt). Slightly moist peat moss is an excellent packing
material. Brison(4) reported that a temperature of 32 deg. F to 38 deg. F in
storage is satisfactory for keeping the buds dormant, and that a few
days from 80 deg. F to 85 deg. F will stimulate cambial activity so that the
patches will "slip" easily when cut. Scionwood is sometimes dipped in
wax, paraffin, or plastic resin before storing in order to prevent loss
of moisture and guard against pathogenic organisms.
Waxes and Wound Dressings
Sitton(19) used a large number of variously formulated waxes on pecan
and found that the most successful from the standpoint of graft survival
was one composed of 10 parts rosin, 2 parts beeswax, and 1 part filler
such as kieselguhr, talc, or aluminum powder. Under Louisiana conditions
a light-colored wax was preferable to dark colored one. Asphalt
emulsions were not satisfactory.
Rootstocks and Interstocks for Hickories
Reed(16) summarized the rootstock studies at Beltsville, Maryland, by
stating that pecans were best on pecan seedlings and that shagbarks were
successful on either shagbark or pecan rootstocks. He reported a lack of
congeniality between shagbark and bitternut hickory. Smith(21), however,
found that pecan stocks were unsuccessful for shagbarks as few scions
lived and growth of those which survived was poor. He also reported that
bitternut was practically as good as shagbark for shagbark varieties.
He stated that pignut was absolutely useless as a stock for shagbark.
Weschcke(24) reported that shagbark varieties grew well on bitternut but
also indicated that a slow growing variety would be stimulated in growth
by working on pecan stocks which are more vigorous in growth than the
other hickories. Dunstan(8) reported that pecan provides a perfectly
satisfactory rootstock for shagbark, shagbark hybrid, and hican
varieties. A number of varieties have been tested over a period of
several years with favorable results as shown by lasting unions and
better than average yields.
The Fairbanks hybrid has often been used as an intermediate stock
between bitternut and some shagbark varieties and Last(10) has stated
that the variety Rockville is useful for interstock purposes on account
of its exceptional vigor.
Nursery Problems
Hickories and pecans have long tap-roots with few branches and hence do
not transplant well. Some few have grown the seedlings for one year in
beds underlain with wire screen netting or have undercut the seedlings
to promote branching of the roots. The stocks must grow two years from
seed to attain a diameter permitting of patch budding and must remain
one or two years more to allow the scion to form a tree. The resulting
plant is large in both root and stem and requires careful handling in
digging, shipping, and planting in the permanent location. The
vicissitudes which befall the production of the northern hickories are
often so great as to discourage nurserymen who otherwise would grow
them. This is an unfortunate fact but a real one, as the would-be
purchaser often learns when he attempts to buy named varieties of
hickories. The situation with the pecan is much better, due perhaps to
the greater demand for such trees but also to the greater ease of
propagation in general nursery practice.
Conclusions
Good varieties of hickories bear good nuts and more people should plant
good trees which should be produced by nurseries with well-branched
fibrous root systems so that they will transplant easily. Research is
needed to determine practical methods of propagation which will permit
of inexpensive quantity production of superior named varieties of
shagbark and shagbark hybrid hickories.
Literature Cited
1. Barton, Lela V. Seedling production in _Carya ovata_, _Juglans
cinerea_, and _Juglans nigra_. Cont. Boyce Thompson Institute 8:1-5.
1936.
2. Becker, Gilbert. Notes from Southwestern Michigan. Rpt. North.
Nut Grow. Assoc. 28:135-136. 1937.
3. Benton, Wm. A. Report on propagation of nut trees. Rpt. North.
Nut Grow. Assoc. 29:90-92. 1938.
4. Brison, Fred R. The storage and seasoning of pecan budwood. Texas
Agric. Expt. Sta. Bul. 478. 1933.
5. ----. Personal correspondence. 1952.
6. Burkett, J. H. The pecan in Texas. Texas Dept. of Agric. Bul.
111. 1932.
7. Corsa, W. P. Nut culture in the United States. U. S. Dept. Agric.
Div. of Pomology. 1896.
8. Dunstan, R. T. Personal correspondence. 1952.
9. Gossard, A. C. Rooting pecan stem tissue by layering. Proc. Amer.
Soc. Hort. Sci. 38:213-214. 1941.
10. Last, Herman. Personal correspondence. 1952.
11. MacDaniels, L. H. Some experiences in nut tree grafting at
Ithaca, N. Y. Rpt. North. Nut Grow. Assoc. 28:52-55. 1937.
12. Morris, R. T. Top working hickories. Rpt. North. Nut Grow.
Assoc. 11:105. 1920.
13. ---- Nut growing. 1931. Macmillan, New York.
14. O'Rourke, F. L. Unpublished data. 1945.
15. Reed, C. A. Nut-tree propagation. U. S. Dept. Agric. For. Bul.
1501. 1926.
16. ----. Hickory species and stock studies at the Plant Industry
Station, Beltsville, Md. Rpt. North. Nut Grow. Assoc. 35:88-121.
1944.
17. Romberg, L. D. Use of nurse seedlings in propagating the pecan
from stem cuttings. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 40:298-300. 1942.
18. Rosborough, J. F., F. R. Brison, C. L. Smith, and L. D. Romberg.
Propagation of pecans by budding and grafting. Texas Ext. Ser. Bul.
B-166. 1949.
19. Sitton, B. G. Pecan grafting methods and waxes. U. S. Dept.
Agric. Circ. 545. 1940.
20. Shelton, E. M. Glauber's salt for humidity control in scion
storage. Rpt. North. Nut Grow. Assoc. 28:70. 1937.
21. Smith, Gilbert L. Our experience with root stocks. Rpt. North.
Nut Grow. Assoc. 40:62-64. 1949.
22. Stoke, H. F. Grafting methods adapted to nut trees. Rpt. North.
Nut Grow. Assoc. 37:99-102. 1946.
23. Stoutemyer, V. T. and F. L. O'Rourke. Unpublished data.
1938-1940.
24. Weschcke, Carl. The importance of stock and
scion relationship in hickory and walnut. Rpt. North. Nut Grow.
Assoc. 39:190-195. 1948.
25. Wilkinson, J. Ford. Preparation of stocks for propagation. Rpt.
North. Nut Grow. Assoc. 28:65-66. 1937.
A Root Disease of Persian Walnut
G. FLIPPO GRAVATT, _U. S. Plant Industry Station, Beltsville, Md._
On three recent trips to southern Europe I noted large numbers of dying
Persian (English) walnuts, _Juglans regia_, in France and Switzerland
and scattered trees in other countries. Dying of Persian walnuts from a
root disease of undetermined cause has been reported from various
European countries for many years. The extensive dying of mature Persian
walnut in a number of areas in southern France is very serious. Farmers
and orchardists are discouraged from planting the Persian walnut even
though it is a very profitable tree when not attacked by the root
disease. In area after area I noted that the farmers had scattered their
Persian walnut trees, separating them as much as possible or planting
them along the boundary of fields instead of in orchard plantings. They
had found too frequently that solid plantings of walnut die from the
root disease. The total number of Persian walnuts in southern France has
decreased alarmingly in the last sixty years. In Tessin Province in
Switzerland many unhealthy Persian walnuts were noted this past summer
showing the same symptoms as in southern France.
Studies By French and Italian pathologists have indicated that the
fungus _Phytophthora cinnamomi_ is the most likely cause of this dying
of walnuts. I was informed that it is worse on soils inclined to be wet
or poorly drained at certain times of the year, conditions favorable for
attack of many hosts of this Phytophthora. The work reported by B. S.
Crandall and me in Phytopathology, March 1945, showed there was a rather
direct relation between soil conditions and _Phytophthora cinnamomi_
damage to black and Persian walnut seedlings. Long periods of heavy
rainfall were very favorable for an epidemic outbreak of this fungus on
walnut and other nursery stock. Another species of _Phytophthora_, _P.
cactorum_, has also attacked black walnuts in nurseries in eastern
United States; this fungus has also been reported on Persian walnuts.
We are interested in receiving reports of the dying of Persian or black
walnuts in orchards or rows of trees in the Eastern half of the United
States. Persian walnuts suffer from winter injury in many areas and
sometimes this injury is confused with the root disease. However, where
there are indications of continuing dying of walnuts year after year
with a progression from one part to another of the planting, we would
like to receive a report.
Some root diseases are difficult to diagnose, especially when the small
roots are the parts affected.
The symptoms of the root disease of the Persian walnut in Europe are in
many ways very similar to those of the Phytophthora root disease of
chestnut and chinkapin in this country as described in the report by
Gravatt and Crandall in the Northern Nut Growers Association Proceedings
for 1944. In some cases Persian walnuts die slowly and in others death
is rapid, with the entire tree browning in summer. Some trees will show
less green color than normal during the summer and gradually die over a
year or two. Trees in different stages of dying can be seen in the same
planting.
Persian walnuts in the Western States in recent years have been dying
from a disease of undetermined cause. Dr. Paul W. Miller and others have
reported on the black line graft union failure, _Armillaria mellea_ and
dying of roots from undetermined causes. As _Phytophthora cinnamomi_, an
imported fungus, is a comparative recent invader of many parts of the
west, Dr. Miller is giving the fungus some attention as a possible
parasite. On some hosts, this fungus attacks primarily the very smallest
roots at certain favorable times of the year, which makes determination
of its role as a parasite rather difficult.
Factors That Influence Nut Production
W. B. WARD, _Extension Horticulturist, Purdue University, Lafayette,
Ind._
The profitable production of fruit on nut trees under cultivation has no
doubt been influenced by several factors. Assuming that the present-day
seedlings and propagated varieties are winter hardy and the tree of
bearing age, 10 to 15 years old, one may expect a reasonable harvest. It
is somewhat disappointing to the owner of a single nut tree or for the
grower on a semi or commercial basis to find that the tree or several
trees have failed to set fruit.
The commercial fruit grower of apples learned, many years ago, that
certain varieties when planted in solid blocks failed to set
satisfactory crops. Rather than lose several years of growth and
expense, the better growers top-worked the trees with a good pollinizer.
The result was a profitable harvest of red and yellow apples, or
varieties of different maturity. The peach grower liked the looks of a
very fine peach and after a short trial found that the variety was not
hardy enough to withstand the winter and early spring temperatures. The
experiences of the commercial fruit growers could be well used by the
nut grower. Only trees adapted to local conditions should be planted
regardless of the recommendations of the nurseryman. Hardiness of wood
and bud, ample production of pollen, reasonable climate during the
growing season, and the control of insects or diseases determine, for
the most part, the success of the harvest.
Soils and Fertility
The nut trees require good drainage and a good supply of moisture. A
reasonably fertile soil should be selected for a planting site but
through mulches, manures, and commercial mineral fertilizers any soil
may be built up to a high state of fertility. A weak tree has little
chance and may come into bearing too late to be of value for the present
owner. The annual growth should be checked each year and, unless 10 to
12 inches of growth has been made the previous year, some means of
stimulating more growth should be employed. The hickory, pecan and black
walnut, as a rule, make little new annual growth while the Persian or
Carpathian walnut, heartnut and chestnut ordinarily produce good annual
growth and an abundance of good foliage grown where it counts the most,
on the new wood.
Those who have observed the growth habits of nut trees know that the
catkins are found on last year's growth, or two year old wood, and the
fruiting flowers at the end of the present season's growth. There are
times when the new growth developed in a matter of a few days to
sometimes as long as two weeks. During the period of prolongation of the
new growth and the formation and receptiveness of the pistillate flower
much can happen. The catkins shed pollen when the temperature and
atmospheric conditions are normal. Many times the pollen is dispersed
before the pistillate flowers are formed.
Cross vs Self-Pollination
There is no assurance that a nut tree which fruits on the average of
eight out of ten years will continue to do so in the future.
Occasionally trees take on an alternate year bearing habit that could be
caused from injury, insect or disease damage, or the relocation of plant
food. The nut trees on their own roots should do better than when
grafted or budded. The compatability of stock and scion is yet to be
worked out and any constriction at the union may alter the fruiting
habits.
The possible sources of pollen for hickory and pecan are from
self-fertile trees, seedlings, and various natural crosses that may or
may not produce edible fruit. The walnut family, which includes the
black and Persian or Carpathian walnut; butternut and Asiatic nut
(heartnut) have been used as pollinizers on the Persian walnut with some
success. The butternut is the first to shed pollen in Indiana with the
catkins dropping, in some years, by late April and the first week in
May. Some years the black walnut has produced the peak pollen from May
5th to 12th but during the spring of 1953 the Thomas, Stabler, Rowher,
Ohio and Stambaugh dropped the pollen from May 18th to 22nd. The Asiatic
walnuts were in full bloom on May 14th and 15th. The above dates do not
correspond to observations of other years, except for the butternut. The
pistillate flowers on the Persian walnuts were fully opened by May 16th.
The catkins of the Persian trees had dried by May 12th. Catkins from the
Asiatic walnuts were kept fresh and distributed throughout two Persian
walnut trees and by mid-afternoon a heavy rain came. On May 18th a few
catkins were again removed from the Asiatic walnut and only enough for
one Persian walnut tree were found and hung in the tree. The first tree
has no fruit while the second tree has a fair crop in the making.
A letter from H. F. Stoke, Chairman of the Survey Committee on the
blossoming dates of the Persian walnut said: "Payne, Lancaster and
Broadview staminate flowers were out on April 9, 10 and 11. The
pistillate flowers of McKinster, Caesar and Crath #1 were receptive on
April 11, 10 and 10." The above dates were over a month before spring
came to Indiana. Whether or not the Stoke varieties in Virginia would do
the same in Indiana or elsewhere is still the problem.
The black walnut varieties mentioned previously set very few fruits at
Lafayette this year while a promising new variety, Sol, from Ferd
Bolten, Linton, Indiana, has a full crop, and has been a consistent
producer for the past several years.
How Many Pounds per Tree
Throughout the Middle West the elm, native chestnut and some of the oaks
are dying from disease troubles. The homemaker wants to plant a tree
that will provide shade, fit well in the landscaping of the home, be a
clean tree and yet be fruitful and bear early.
The age of the tree and the growth has much to do with production. Some
pecan varieties have produced several hundred pounds per tree and the
same for black walnuts with hickory, butternut and chestnut in smaller
quantities. There are four Persian walnut trees growing in Franklin,
Indiana, that are 20 years old and have fruited continuously for the
past 10 years. The trees were seedlings, two of which are very promising
for distribution. Tree #1 produces an average of 10 pounds; tree #2, 15
pounds; #3, about 40 pounds and #4, 100 pounds. Good pollination under
common growing conditions of the Midwest and a good variety acclimated
for general planting will no doubt make a host of good friends and a
wonderful contribution from the members of the N.N.G.A.
Rootstocks for the Walnut in France[2]
J. C. MCDANIEL
[2]This is a translation, by Dr. R. T. Dunstan, of the section on
"Rootstocks" in Chapter XI of _Les Noyers_, by two Doctors of Pharmacy,
P. Peyre and E. Lancosme. This 447 page book with 140 figures was
published in 1942 by Jouve et Cie, 15, rue Racine, Paris, and is a very
complete treatise on the subject of walnuts.
The French experience with the eastern black walnut and the related
Arizona walnut as rootstocks is interesting, as is the discussion of one
method of propagation, where dormant whole-root grafts are started in
pots under glass. This differs somewhat from the indoor grafting
procedures described in our recent Reports by Mr. Stephen Bernath and
Dr. Philip Brierley. (Incidentally, Dr. Brierley tells me that he got
uniformly good grafts--96 to 100% growing--in his 1953 experiment. The
use of growth substance powder did not significantly increase the
"take". The controlling factors seem to be the use of healthy scions and
rootstocks, followed by high enough temperature and humidity to promote
rapid callusing of the grafts.)
The "old Royal Walnut" of the French is, of course, what we call Persian
(or English) walnut, and not Luther Burbank's "Royal Hybrid", the
unfortunately named cross of two black walnuts, _J. nigra_ x _J.
hindsii_. _J. torreyi_ is a synonym for _J. major_, the Arizona walnut.
Rootstocks fulfilling two essential conditions should be chosen, those
capable of adapting themselves to soil and climate where they are to be
planted and of resisting diseases that may attack them under unsanitary
conditions or under too intense cultivation. Among the numerous
varieties tested, two deserve attention as choice rootstocks, one
native, the other American = _J. regia_ and _J. nigra_.
_J. regia_, our old Royal Walnut, so common in France, is excellent when
planted in new, light and fertile soils, preferably clay-lime or
clay-silicon.
But as the roots are very spreading it is important to stir the soil
well but slightly and avoid deep plowing, for it is well known that
through accidental injury to the roots the various "armillaria" enter
the trees to develop the "pourridie" or "pus disease", or "circle
disease". It is better, then, to use a rootstock immune to this malady
so wide-spread among our native walnuts.
_J. nigra_ enjoys this happy advantage of offering no foothold to this
parasite, so harmful to its sister species. It accommodates itself well
in many soils in which _J. regia_ will grow, even dry and gravelly, but
prefers soils which are fresh, open, rich, and especially, deep. Its
roots are long and vertical and their development stops in contact with
an impermeable layer of soil.
It produces specimens magnificent in height and rapidity of growth.
Color of bark differs, though diameter of tree is more or less the same.
This slight objection may be easily avoided by grafting regia on nigra
at ground-level when wood is well matured and in mild weather.
Proof that this species of walnut is resistant to "pourridie" was given
in a report to members of the Congress of Grenoble in 1936 by Mr. Bourne
of Saint Marcelin. "At Blache de Vinay, we are told, some black walnuts,
planted more than thirty years ago in an infested field, have shown full
resistance. One tree, grafted at ground-level and planted too deep, was
infected many years ago by the "pus" above the graft on the _J. regia_
part. The diseased part was treated as was the custom then, with
sulphuric acid, etc. The wound healed and the rootstock remained
absolutely clean. A photo by Mr. Roy, Director of Agricultural Services
at Isere, establishes this absolute proof.
Other varieties of walnut have been tested as rootstocks--_cinerea_,
_cordiformis_, and _Siebodiana_, but only the first seems to have given
any satisfactory results.
Reporter Bourne concludes, "The primary purpose of our research on
rootstocks will be to obtain a hybrid of _regia_ x _nigra_ that will
combine the resistance of nigra to the "pourridie" and regia's habit of
vegetating late in spring.
By virtue of the ability of the female element to transmit its rusticity
and vegetative form it seems, _a priori_, that we shall get a good
rootstock by crossing _nigra_ as mother by Franquette (sic) and then if
need be, by backcrossing to Franquette in the second generation.
There exists a 4th type of walnut graft, dating from 1880, which if done
intelligently, permits the rapid multiplication of the walnut--the root
graft.
In a short but very interesting report to the Nut Congress of Grenoble
in October, 1936 by Mr. Leon Treyves, and very kindly sent on to us, the
author says, "This procedure, devised by my family around 1880, consists
of grafting on one year old roots, branches from selected, vigorous
trees, either by cleft or English grafts, whichever gives best fit of
scion (which is generally smaller than root) and stock. Graft is then
tied with raffia and waxed to avoid all contact with air and placed in a
moderately heated frame. After a month of this treatment the graft has
taken. Then it is gradually accustomed to open air and the frame is
removed. In the fall or the following spring the graft may be planted in
its permanent location or in nursery row.
This system presents numerous advantages:
1. Rapidity, since the plants can be grafted after one year,
instead of three or four.
2. Economy of time and expense, since considerable numbers of grafts
can be made rapidly and in limited space.
3. More rapid development of growth and fruiting. Saplings of 1 to 2
meters planted in winter of '28-'29 measured in October '36 25-27
cm. in circumference at one meter from ground. Trees two and three
years old, still in nursery, are bearing one to two normally
developed fruits.
The author indicates that he uses _nigra_ for stocks, "since that is the
only one that has proved its adaptation to grafting and its resistance
to the "pus disease"."
At the time he gave his paper in '36 Mr. Treyves announced that he was
continuing his grafting experiments on _J. Sieboldiana, cordiformis_ and
_torreyi. [J. torreyi_ = _J. major_--J. C. McDaniel.]
Mr. Treyves, whom we cannot thank too much for his favor, was kind
enough to set forth the preliminary techniques of his method of
root-grafting. We give a resume of them here.
1. Preparation. Plant nuts well-spaced in rows in good soil, convenient
to irrigation, if needed. Clean nuts of good quality, previously
stratified, should be planted in winter. Plants are lifted before the
following spring and heeled in. For scions wood of 7-8 cm. is cut from
young, healthy and vigorous trees and passed to the grafter at the same
time as the roots, which have been previously lifted, washed and cut off
at the crown or a little below. Scion, bevelled, is set either in
English or cleft graft, tied with raffia or with a numbered wool strip,
waxed and potted in rich but light soil, moderately firmed around roots.
Pots are then set in some homogeneous material (waste tan-bark or
sawdust) and left in a moderately heated bed.
2. Care. Watering. Temperature of beds should be kept constant around
grafts and they should be watered every other day. Of course, grass and
mold should be prevented.
As soon as grafts begin to grow (usually around 15 days) the pots are
gradually removed from sawdust, and when plants have made 15-20 cm. of
growth (after 30-40 days) they are slowly hardened to air and sun,
replanted in well-shaded beds, properly watered and cared for until they
are set in nursery row.
3. Planting in nursery. The following spring they are set 60 cm. apart
in nursery rows 1 m. apart in well-manured and well-prepared plots.
Usual care during growth. With the 2nd year plants attain 1-1/4-1-1/2 m.
and it is not uncommon to discover a nut. The 3rd year they make 2-1/2
m. at least with 8-12 cm. of girth and are ready for transplanting to
permanent site.
4. Soils and situations. Mr. Treyves tells us that the walnut plantings
in "lower Gresivuaudan" are on old alluvium of the Isere Valley and in
limy marl soils of the upper slopes. A little farther away in Savoy, the walnut is
vigorous in Jurassic or clay limestone soils. The same is true in
Dordogne, in Correze, and in the Lot, where soils are of similar origin.
Walnuts are found at an average altitude of 600 m. but grow up to 1200
m. in Savoy, and particularly in Switzerland.
The best exposures are SW, W, and SE, sunny slopes, well protected from
the north wind and late frosts.
Mr. Treyves has personally some plantings of walnut in Sologne, (where
calcareous soils are lacking) and in Champagne, where the soils lack
lime. He has noted that these trees grow and fruit normally.
Cultivation. It is important to keep soil around isolated trees well
stirred and to increase the area of cultivation as the rootspread
increases.
5. Rootstocks. For the present the plants chosen for stocks have come
from nigra, the only one that has proved itself in the matter of "take".
It does well in moist soils.
Mr. Treyves has personally tried to graft Mayette and Franquette on
_Torreyi_. He has found the "take" and the union perfect. But even
though vegetation is promising we must wait 22 years for a full test.
He proposes to lest all the "rootstocks placed at his disposal in order
to acclimatize the good French varieties to all the soils which suit
these stocks. Grafting on _J. Torreyi_ will be useful to a [_sera utile
a un_] stock that grows in dry soil, like _nigra_.
"But that is a matter we shall have to examine again in ten years, first
as regards vegetation and then in 20 years as concerns fruit
production."
Since these experiments date from '36 at the time of the Grenoble
Congress we have only 13 years to wait to learn what sort of fruit these
trees will bear and only 5 to see how they behave vegetatively.
It remains, then, only to wish "good luck" to our kind and devoted
correspondent and to thank him for his valuable documentation.
Pictorial Record of Grafting at Climax, Michigan
W. M. BECKERT, _Jackson, Mich._
Top-working black walnuts to Persian Walnuts has long been practiced by
various members of this organization. It is hoped by this series of
Kodachrome slides that a record of such top-working by one of our
members would be of interest and also show the details of just how the
work is done under actual field conditions.
Mr. Gilbert Becker, of Climax, Michigan, has been quite successful in
top-working black walnuts. Needless to say, these pictures were taken to
show how an expert goes about grafting black walnuts. Mr. Becker was
contacted as to when he would do his grafting and he mentioned that on
May 80, 1953, he would be top-working his stock. Plans were made to be
present on that date and we were fortunate in having bright weather for
taking the pictures.
The first two slides show Mr. Becker removing the scionwood from his
storage pit, selecting the scions and preparing to go out to do the
grafting. On the way to the trees that were to be grafted, the pictures
for the next two slides were taken to show the stage of leaf development
and the length of the catkins of the Thomas Black Walnut, so members in
other sections of the country can see how far out in leaf the Thomas
variety was when the grafting was done.
The following series of slides show how Mr. Becker top-works the black
walnuts.
First, removing that portion of the stock, note he used a pruning saw,
makes a cut at the point where he wants to graft. He uses the bark slit
method. The scion is shaped by one stroke of the grafting knife; a long
slanting cut is made and the scion inserted in the stock. Just prior to
placing the scion, the bark of the stock is slit, two cuts with the
point of the knife, approximate width of the scion and down along the
bark to the length the scion is to be inserted, then the scion is
placed. The next step is to cut off the little sliver of bark which is
pushed out, at the point where it does not contact the scion. In this
tree, two scions were placed, the scions being wrapped tightly with
waxed muslin which was prepared beforehand, using strips about one-half
inch wide. Enough was used to firmly bind the scions to the stock.
Please note that a small piece of wax muslin was placed on the inside of
the scion to prevent the wax from going down between the scion and
stock. The final step is waxing the scion and brushing with hot wax, in
order to prevent the scion from drying out; to provide shade, Mr.
Becker, in this case, used grass and made a hood over the scion, tying
it with string.
The following slides show the same procedure of grafting other trees.
You will note in one case he has climbed up into the branches of the
tree. To shade the scions, he used aluminum foil, folded around the
scion and tied with a rubber grafting strip. In all these pictures the
scions used were Colby.
Mr. Becker is very adept, quick, and does the grafting so that it
actually seems effortless. His technique is so fast, there is very
little chance of the scion drying out before it is placed.
On July 26th, I returned to Climax and the grafts were successful, as
you can see by the following series. The one failure was the first tree
that was grafted, and which had the grass for shading of the scion.
Rock Phosphate for Nut Trees
HARRY P. BURGART, _Union City, Mich._
My soil is of the sandy type and I have to watch the mineral content
rather closely for nitrogen and phosphate deficiencies. Winter-killing
of one year black walnut and pecan seedlings is serious during seasons
when our winters are less severe than usual and during winters when we
had had plenty of snow cover for protection. This worried me a great
deal and I decided there must be a deficiency. Soil tests repeatedly
showed a lack of phosphate.
I applied ground rock phosphate to my larger bearing English walnut
trees and there has not been the least sign of winter injury since.
Many of my smaller nut trees have been bearing earlier for me since I
have been using the phosphate. Customers who come here often remark at
the way some of my little grafted trees are bearing crops and I tell
them that I believe in keeping plenty of phosphate in the soil for root
growth and nut production.
I am writing this brief article thinking that it might help solve the
problems of other nut growers who have repeatedly been having trouble
with winter-killing of their Carpathian, or English walnut trees.
Phosphate seems to prevent a late sappy-condition from causing winter
injury.
I prefer to apply the phosphate and nitrogen early in April or early
May. Fall applications of any kind of fertilizer are apt to cause winter
injury. I usually scatter the rock phosphate around the trees using
about four handfuls around a first year tree. Then I turn over the sod
bottom with a shovel, which puts the phosphate down where the roots can
get it. I use the phosphate around all the young trees we set out and
seldom lose a tree as the phosphate encourages the starting of new
feeder roots on the nut trees.
A Report From Southern Minnesota
R. E. HODGSON, _University of Minnesota, Southern School and Experiment
Station, Waseca, Minn._
We have 20 odd Carpathian walnut trees growing from nuts planted about
1931. So far, I have never seen a flower on any of them. They grow up 6
or 8 feet in a year and that seems to be their difficulty. They do not
stop growing in time to harden off before cold weather comes. I think a
lot of the winter killing is also due to sun scald which would indicate
an inability to retain dormancy during a January thaw. Some of the trees
have lived through two winters with only minor damage and then when the
right conditions come along, they are killed to the ground. Wrapping the
trunks with aluminum foil has not solved the problem. I have purchased
one or two grafted trees which were recommended as more hardy but so far
they have had the same experience as the one I grew from nuts.
Black walnut and hickory do well here and I have a hiccan perhaps 20
feet tall but it has never borne any nuts. Chinese chestnuts are not
entirely hardy and grow very slowly. This year I set out about 20
American chestnuts from Minnesota grown seed and I hope that we are far
enough from other trees of this variety to escape the blight. Tree
growing is just a hobby and lately there has been very little time for
hobbies.
Chestnut Breeding
Report for 1953
ARTHUR HARMOUNT GRAVES and HANS NIENSTAEDT, _The Connecticut
Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut_
The chief aim of this breeding work, which has been carried on now
without interruption since 1930, is to develop a tall timber type of
chestnut by breeding the American species with the blight resistant but
comparatively low-growing Japanese and Chinese chestnuts, _Castanea
crenata_ and _C. mollissima_, respectively. Practically all trees of our
valuable American chestnut of any appreciable size have now been killed
to the ground by the blight fungus, _Endothia parasitica_. Shoots
arising from the base of the old stumps often live long enough to bear
pollen, and this we have lately been forced to use in our breeding work
with the disadvantage that we can not know definitely the nature of the
genotype of the pollen parent. American pollen from a good phenotype
near Washington, D. C., was kindly furnished us in the early 30's by the
then Office of Forest Pathology of the U.S.D.A., and this stock is now
incorporated with our older Japanese-American and Chinese-American
hybrids.
As indicated in the following pages, we are not neglecting the
nut-bearing potentialities of the chestnut tree.
Weather Conditions in 1953
The disastrous ice storm of the 9th and 10th of January caused slight
damage to some of the Chinese trees. Their numerous, more or less
horizontal branches and characteristically brittle wood make them prone
to damage of this sort; nevertheless, only a few branches were lost.
After a comparatively warm February, the warmest since 1925, March
brought us more rain than for any March in the 81 years records have
been kept[3]--a total of 10.78 inches. This was all to the good, as
later events proved. Because of the preceding warm February the ground
was for the most part unfrozen, so that, instead of running off, the
water was largely absorbed in the soil, and thus added to the water
table. The precipitation of April was again heavy--5.6 inches--the
normal per month for this area being about 3-1/2 inches. After an
unusually good growing season in May, June and July, about the middle of
August a long drought of nearly 10 weeks duration commenced. The
conditions were similar to those in 1952, except that in that year the
drought began later, in October. However, the large amount of water in
the soil from the spring rains prevented serious consequences, just as
in 1952 the heavy rainfall in August and the normal one in September
mitigated any serious results from the later drought of that year.
[3] Weather records are taken from the monthly reports of the municipal
airport at New Haven, Conn., and are compared with the New York City
records for the same period, kept by the U. S. Weather Bureau at 17
Battery Place, New York City.
Hybrids of 1953