CHAPTER XVII.

SELECTION OF TRANSMISSION CIRCUITS.

Maximum power, voltage, loss, and weight of conductors having been fixed

for a transmission line, the number of circuits that shall make up the

line, and the relations of these circuits to each other, remain to be

determined.

In practice wide differences exist as to the number and relations of

circuits on a single transmission line between two points. Cases

illustrating this fact are the 147-mile transmission from Electra

power-house to San Francisco and the 65-mile transmission between Cañon

Ferry, on the Missouri River and Butte, Mont. At the Electra plant the

generator capacity is 10,000 kilowatts, and the transmission to San

Francisco is carried out over a single pole line that carries one

circuit composed of three aluminum conductors, each with an area in

cross section of 471,000 circular mils. From the generators at Cañon

Ferry, which have an aggregate capacity of 7,500 kilowatts, a part of

the energy goes to Helena over a separate line, and the transmission to

Butte goes over two pole lines that are 40 feet apart. Each of these two

pole lines carries a single circuit composed of three copper conductors,

and each conductor has a cross section of 105,600 circular mils. The

difference in practice illustrated by these two plants is further

brought out by the fact that their voltages are not far apart, as the

Cañon Ferry and Butte line operates at 50,000, and the Electra and San

Francisco line at 60,000 volts.

Economy in the construction of a transmission line points strongly to

the use of a single circuit, because this means only one line of poles,

usually but one cross-arm for the power wires per pole, the least

possible number of pins and insulators, and the smallest amount of labor

for the erection of the conductors. In favor of a single circuit there

is also the argument of greatest mechanical strength in each conductor,

since the single circuit is to have the same weight as that of all the

circuits that may be adopted in its place. Where each conductor of the

single circuit would have a cross section of less than 83,690 circular

mils, if of copper, corresponding to a No. 1 B. & S. gauge wire, the

argument as to mechanical strength is of especial force, since two equal

circuits instead of one, in the case where one circuit of No. 1 wires

would have the required weight, reduce the size of each conductor to No.

4 wire, of 41,740 circular mils cross section, and this is the smallest

wire that it is practicable to use on long lines for mechanical reasons.

Opposed to these arguments for a single circuit are those based on the

supposed greater reliability of two or more circuits, their greater ease

of repair, their more effective means of regulation, and the influence

on inductance of a reduction in the size of conductors.

In spite of the consequent reduction in the size of each conductor, the

use of two or more separate circuits for the same transmission is

sometimes thought to increase its reliability, because in case of a

break or short-circuit on one of the circuits the other will still be

available. Breaks in transmission conductors are due either to

mechanical strains alone, as wind pressure, the falling of trees, or the

accumulation of ice, or else to an arc between the conductors that tends

to melt them at some point. As a smaller conductor breaks or melts more

readily than a large one, the use of two or more circuits instead of a

single circuit tends to increase troubles of this sort. It thus seems

that while two or more circuits give a greater chance of continued

operation after a break in a conductor actually occurs, the use of a

single circuit with larger conductors makes any break less probable.

When repairs must be made on a transmission line, as in replacing a

broken insulator or setting a pole in the place of one that has burned,

it is certainly convenient to have two or more circuits so that one may

be out of use while the repairs on it are made. It is practicable,

however, to make such repairs on any high-voltage circuit, even when it

is in use, provided the conductors are spaced so far apart that there is

no chance of making a contact or starting an arc between them. To get

such distance between conductors there should be only one circuit per

pole, and even then more room should be provided for that circuit than

is common in this type of construction. On each of the two pole lines

between Cañon Ferry and Butte there is a single circuit of three

conductors arranged in triangular form, two at the opposite ends of a

cross-arm and one at the top of the pole, and the distance from each

conductor of a circuit to either of the other two is 6.5 feet. This

distance between conductors is perhaps as great as that on any

transmission circuit now in use, but it seems too small to make repairs

on the circuit reasonably safe when it is in operation at a pressure of

50,000 volts. There seems to be no good reason why the distance between

the conductors of a single circuit to which a pole line is devoted might

not be increased to as much as ten feet, at the slightly greater

expense of longer cross-arms. With as much as ten feet between

conductors, and special tools with long wooden handles to grasp these

conductors, there should be no serious danger about the repair of even

60,000-volt lines when in operation. As the 60,000-volt line between

Electra and San Francisco consists of only one circuit, it seems that

repairs on it must be contemplated during operation.

Another example of a high-voltage transmission carried out with a single

circuit is that between Shawinigan Falls and Montreal, a distance of

eighty-five miles. In this case the circuit is made up of three aluminum

conductors, each of which has an area in cross section of 183,750

circular mils, and these conductors are located five feet apart, one at

the top of each pole, and two at the ends of a cross-arm below. This

single circuit is in regular operation at 50,000 volts for the supply of

light and power in Montreal, and it is hard to see how repairs while

there is current on the line are to be avoided.

Inductance varies with the ratio between the diameter of the wires in

any circuit and the distance between these wires, but as inductance

simply raises the voltage that must be delivered by generators or

transformers, and does not represent a loss of energy, it may generally

be given but little weight in selecting the number of circuits, the

distance between conductors, and the size of each conductor. If two or

more circuits with smaller conductors have a combined resistance in

multiple equal to that of a single circuit with larger conductors, the

loss of voltage due to inductance may be greater on the single circuit

than the corresponding loss on the multiple circuits, but the advantages

due to the single circuit may more than compensate for the higher

pressure at generators or transformers. That such advantages have been

thought to exist in actual construction may be seen from the fact that

the 147-mile line from Electra power-house to San Francisco, and the

83-mile line from Shawinigan Falls to Montreal, are composed of one

circuit each. As inductance increases directly with the length of

circuits, these very long lines are especially subject to its influence,

yet it was thought that the advantages of a single circuit more than

offset its disadvantages in each case.

Where several sub-stations, widely separated, are to be supplied with

energy by the same transmission line, another argument exists for the

division of the line conductors into more than one circuit, so that

there may be an independent circuit to each sub-station. As the pressure

for local distribution lines must be regulated at each sub-station, it

is quite an advantage to have a separate transmission circuit between

each sub-station and the power plant, so that the voltage on each

circuit at the power-house may be adjusted as nearly as possible to the

requirements of its sub-station. An interesting illustration of this

practice may be noted in the design of transmission circuits for the

line between Spier Falls on the Hudson River and the cities of

Schenectady, Troy, and Albany, located between thirty and forty miles to

the south, which passes through Saratoga and Ballston on the way. When

this transmission line is completed, four three-phase circuits, one of

No. 0 and three of No. 000 copper wire, will run to the Saratoga

switch-house from the generating plant at the Falls, a distance of some

eight miles.

From this switch-house two circuits of No. 0 conductors go to the

Saratoga sub-station, a little more than one mile away, two circuits of

No. 000 wires run to the Watervliet sub-station, across the river from

Troy and thirty-five miles from the generating station, and one circuit

of No. 0 and one circuit of No. 000 wires are carried to Schenectady,

thirty miles from Spier Falls, passing through and supplying the

Ballston sub-station on the way. Other circuits connect the sub-station

at Watervliet with that at Schenectady and with the water-power station

at Mechanicsville. From the Watervliet sub-station secondary lines run

to sub-stations that control the local distribution of light and power

in Albany and Troy. This network of transmission circuits was made

desirable by the conditions of this case, which include the general

supply of light and power in three large and several smaller cities, the

operation of three large electric railway systems, and the delivery of

thousands of horse-power for the motors in a great manufacturing plant.

In not every transmission system with different and widely scattered

loads it is thought desirable to provide more than one main circuit.

Thus, the single circuit eighty-three miles long that transmits energy

from Shawinigan Falls to Montreal is designed to supply power also in

some smaller places on the way.

So again, the 147-mile circuit from Electra power-house to San Francisco

passes through a dozen or more smaller places, including Stockton, and

is tapped with side lines that run to Oakland and San José. In cases

like this, where very long lines run through large numbers of cities and

towns that sooner or later require service, it is obviously

impracticable to provide a separate circuit for each centre of local

distribution. It may well be in such a case that a single main

transmission circuit connected to a long line of sub-stations will

represent the best possible solution of the problem. At the power-house

end of such a circuit the voltage will naturally be regulated to suit

that sub-station where the load is the most important or exacting, and

each of the other sub-stations will be left to do all of the regulating

for its own load.

[Illustration: FIG. 76.--Connections at Watervliet Sub-station on Spier

Falls Line.]

The greater the total loss of voltage on a transmission line supplying

sub-stations that are scattered along much of its length, the larger

will be the fluctuations of voltage that must be compensated for at all

of the sub-stations save one, under changing loads, if only one circuit

is employed between the power-plant and these sub-stations. Suppose, for

example, that a transmission line 100 miles long is composed of a single

circuit, and supplies two sub-stations, one located 50 miles and the

other 100 miles from the power-plant. Assume at first that there is no

load whatever at the intermediate sub-station. If the single

transmission circuit operates with 50,000 volts at the power-plant, and

45,000 volts at the sub-station 100 miles away when there is a full load

there, corresponding to a loss of ten per cent, then the pressure at the

intermediate sub-station will be 47,500 volts. If, now, the load at the

sub-station 100 miles from the power-house drops to a point where the

entire line loss is only 1,000 volts, and the pressure at the generating

plant is lowered to 46,000 volts so as to maintain 45,000 volts at the

more distant sub-station, then the pressure at the intermediate

sub-station will be 45,500 volts, or 2,000 volts less than it was

before. If the loss on the entire line at full load were only five per

cent, making the voltage at the sub-station 100 miles away 47,500 when

that at the generating station is 50,000, then the pressure at the

intermediate sub-station will be 48,750 volts. Upon a reduction of the

loss on the entire length of line to one-fifth of its maximum amount, or

to 500 volts, the pressure at the generating station must be reduced to

48,000 volts, if that at the more distant sub-station is to be held

constant at 47,500. At the intermediate sub-station the pressure will

then be 47,750 volts, or 1,000 volts less than it was at full load. From

these two examples it may be seen that the extent of pressure variation

at the intermediate sub-station will depend directly on the maximum line

loss, if the regulation at the generating station is such as to maintain

a constant voltage at the sub-station 100 miles away.

[Illustration: FIG. 77.--Sections of Switch-house on New Hampshire

Traction System.]

All the foregoing has assumed no load to be connected at the

intermediate sub-station, and with a load there the fluctuations of

pressure will of course depend on its amount as well as on the load at

the more distant sub-station.

One of the strongest reasons for the use of two or more circuits in the

same transmission line arises from the rapid fluctuations of load where

large stationary motors or an electric railway system is operated. When

a transmission line must carry a load of stationary or railway motors,

it is a common practice to divide the line into at least two circuits,

and to devote one circuit exclusively to railway or motor work and

another to lighting, at any one time. In some cases this division of the

transmission system into two parts, one devoted to the lighting and the

other to the motor load, is carried out not only as to the sub-station

apparatus and the line, but also as to the transformers, generators,

water-wheels, and even the penstocks at the power-plant. It is possible

even to carry this division of the transmission system still further,

and to separate either the motor or the lighting load, or both, into

sections, and then to devote a distinct transmission circuit, group of

transformers, generator, and water-wheel to the operation of each

section. An example of the complete division of generating and

transmitting apparatus into independent units may be noted in the case

of the system that supplies light and power in Portland, Me., from a

generating plant on the Presumpscot River, thirteen miles away. At this

station four steel penstocks, each provided with a separate gate at the

forebay wall, bring water to as many pairs of wheels, and each pair of

wheels drives a direct-connected generator. Four three-phase circuits

connect the generating plant with the sub-station at Portland, and each

circuit between the generating plant and a transformer-house outside the

business section of the city is made up of No. 2 solid soft-drawn copper

wires.

Each of these four sets of apparatus, from head-gate to sub-station, is

usually operated independently of the others, and supplies either the

motor load or a part of the electric lighting. In this way changes in

the amount of one section of the load cause no fluctuation of the

voltage on the other sections. At Manchester, N. H., the sub-station

receives energy from four water-power plants, and is provided with two

sets of low-tension, 2,300-volt, three-phase bus-bars, one set of these

bus-bars being devoted to the operation of the local electric railway

system, and the other set to the supply of lamps and stationary motors.

Each set of these bus-bars is divided into a number of sections, and by

means of these sections different transmission circuits are devoted to

different portions of the lighting and motor loads. As three of the four

water-power plants are connected to the sub-station by two circuits

each, the division of loads in this case is often carried clear back to

the generators, one generator in a power-house being operated, for

instance, on railway work and another on a lighting load at the same

time. This plan has the obvious advantage that much of the regulation

for the several parts of the entire load may be done at the generators,

thus reducing the amount of regulation necessary at the sub-station, and

that fluctuating motor loads do not affect the lamps. In this case the

conductors of the several transmission circuits are all of moderate

size, and the division of the lines was evidently adopted for purposes

of regulation, rather than to reduce the amount of inductance. Thus the

line between Gregg’s Falls and the sub-station, a distance of six miles,

is made up of one three-phase circuit of No. 4 and one circuit of No. 6

bare copper wires. The fourteen-mile line between the plant at Garvin’s

Falls and the sub-station, the longest of the four transmissions, is

made up of two three-phase circuits, each composed of No. 0 bare copper

wires. In the case of the Gregg’s Falls plant the subdivision of the

line has gone further than that of the generating equipment, for the

station there contains only a single generator, the rating being 1,200

kilowatts, while two circuits run thence to the sub-station. Another

instance showing extensive subdivision of a line into separate circuits

may be noted in the seven-mile transmission from Montmorency Falls to

Quebec, Canada, where sixteen conductors, each No. 0 copper wire, make

up four two-phase circuits that connect a plant of 2,400 kilowatts

capacity with its sub-station.

Such multiplication of transmission circuits has some advantages from

the standpoint of regulation, but there are good reasons for limiting it

to rather short lines, where it is, in fact, almost exclusively found.

On very long lines the use of numerous circuits composed of rather small

conductors would obviously increase the constant expense of inspection

and repairs and add materially to uncertainty of the service. Very few,

if any, transmission lines of as much as twenty-five miles in length are

divided into more than two circuits, and in several instances lines of

superlative length have only a single circuit each. The greatest single

power transmission in the world, that between Niagara Falls and Buffalo,

is carried out with two pole lines, one of which is about twenty and the

other about twenty-three miles long. The longer pole line, which is also

the older, carries two three-phase circuits, each of which is made up of

three 350,000 circular mil copper conductors. The shorter pole line

carries a single three-phase circuit composed of aluminum conductors,

each of which has an area in cross section of 500,000 circular mils. In

electrical conductivity the aluminum circuit is intended to be equal to

each of the two that are composed of copper. According to the

description of the Niagara Falls and Buffalo transmission system in vol.

xviii., A. I. E. E., pages 518 to 527, each of these three circuits is

designed to transmit about 7,500 kilowatts, and the maximum power

transmitted up to August, 1901, was 15,600 kilowatts, or about the

calculated capacity of two of the circuits. According to the description

just mentioned, the transmission circuits used to supply energy for use

at Buffalo are regularly operated in parallel, and this is also true of

the generators and the step-down transformers, though the uses to which

this energy is applied include lighting, large stationary motors, and

the electric railway system. Apparatus in the generating station at

Niagara Falls and in the terminal-house near the city limits of Buffalo

is so arranged, however, that two of the 3,750 kilowatt generators and

eight step-up transformers at the power-house, together with one

transmission circuit and three step-down transformers in the

terminal-house at Buffalo, may be operated independently of all the

other apparatus.

As already pointed out, the use of separate circuits for each

sub-station, and for lighting and power loads at each sub-station in

very long transmission systems, is often impracticable. Even in

comparatively short transmissions the multiplication of circuits and the

use of rather small and mechanically weak conductors increased the first

cost of installation and the subsequent expense of inspection and

repairs. An objection to operation with a single circuit in a

transmission line that supplies widely separated sub-stations with

lighting, power, and railway loads is the consequent difficulty of

pressure regulation on the distribution lines at each sub-station. Such

a transmission line necessarily delivers energy at different and

fluctuating voltages at the several sub-stations, and these fluctuations

are of course reproduced on the secondary side of the step-down

transformers. Fortunately, however, the use of synchronous motor

generators, either in place of or in connection with static

transformers, goes far to solve the problem of pressure regulation for

distribution circuits supplied with energy from transmission lines. This

is due to the well-known fact that with constant frequency the speed of

rotation for a synchronous motor is constant without regard to

fluctuations in the applied voltage or changes in its load. With a

constant speed at the motor and its connected generator it is of course

easy to deliver current at constant voltage to the distribution lines.

This constancy of speed makes the synchronous motor generator a favorite

in large transmission systems with both power and lighting loads. The

satisfactory lighting service in Buffalo, operated with energy

transmitted from Niagara Falls, seems to be due in some measure to the

use of synchronous motor generators at the sub-station in Buffalo,

whence lighting circuits are supplied. As above stated, the three

circuits that make up the transmission line between Niagara Falls and

Buffalo are operated in multiple, and in the latter place there is a

large load of both railway and stationary motors. As the three circuits

are operated in multiple, they of course amount to only a single

circuit so far as fluctuations of voltage due to changes in these

several sorts of loads are concerned. According to vol. xviii., A. I. E.

E., pages 125 and following, the load on the transmission system at

Buffalo in 1901 was made up of about 7,000 horse-power in railway

motors, 4,000 horse-power in induction motors, and 4,000 horse-power

divided up between series arc lamps, constant pressure incandescent

lamps, and continuous current motors. The railway load is operated

through step-down transformers and rotary converters. The induction

motors are connected either to the 2,000-volt secondary circuits of the

step-down transformers or to service transformers supplied by these

circuits. On these railway and stationary motor loads there is of course

no necessity for close pressure regulation. Series arc lamps are

operated through step-down transformers and synchronous motors

direct-connected to constant continuous current dynamos. Continuous

current stationary motors draw power from the transmission lines through

step-down transformers and rotary converters, like the railway load. For

the 2,200 volt circuits that supply service transformers for commercial

arc and incandescent lighting the transmitted energy passes through

step-down transformers and synchronous motor-generators. These

motor-generators raise the frequency from twenty-five to sixty cycles

per second. Finally the continuous current three-wire system for

incandescent lighting at about 250 volts between outside wires is

operated through step-down transformers and synchronous motors

direct-connected to continuous current generators. For this last-named

service rotary converters were at first tried, but were found to be

impracticable because voltage fluctuations on the transmission line (due

largely to the railway and motor loads) were reproduced on the

continuous-current circuits by the rotary converters. Since the adoption

of motor-generators this fluctuation of the service voltage is no longer

present.

Another case in which synchronous motor-generators deliver power from a

transmission line that carries both a lighting and a motor load is that

of the Shawinigan sub-station in Montreal. At this sub-station the

85-mile transmission line from the generating plant at Shawinigan Falls

terminates. As already pointed out, this line is composed of a single

three-phase circuit of aluminum conductors, each of which has a cross

section of 183,750 circular mils. In the Montreal sub-station the

thirty-cycle, three-phase current from Shawinigan Falls is delivered to

transformers that lower the voltage to 2,300. The current then goes to

five synchronous motor-generators of 1,200 horse-power capacity each,

and is there converted to sixty-three cycles per second, two-phase, at

the same voltage. This converted current passes onto the distribution

lines of the local electrical supply system in Montreal, which also

draws energy from two other water-power plants, and is devoted to

lighting, stationary motors, or to the street railway work, as may be

required. Though separate local distribution circuits are devoted to

these several loads, the fluctuations in the stationary and railway

motor work necessarily react on the voltage of the transmission line and

transformers at the sub-station. By the use of the synchronous

motor-generators the lighting circuits are protected from these pressure

variations.

As the numbers of sub-stations at different points on long transmission

lines increase, and stationary motor and railway loads at each become

more common, it is to be expected that the use of synchronous

motor-generators for lighting service will be much more frequent than at

present. With such use there will disappear one of the reasons for the

multiplication of transmission circuits.

[Illustration: FIG. 78.--Transfer Switches at Saratoga Switch-house on

Spier Falls Line.]

Where several transmission circuits connect a generating plant with a

single sub-station, or with several sub-stations in the same general

direction, it is desirable to have switches so arranged that two or more

circuits may be combined as one, or so that any circuit that ordinarily

operates a certain load or sub-station may be devoted to another when

occasion requires. For this purpose transfer switches on each circuit

are necessary at generating plants, sub-stations, and often at

switch-houses. These transfer switches will ordinarily be of the knife

type, and intended for manual operation when the circuits to which they

are connected are not in use. As such switches are exposed to the full

voltage of transmission, the insulation of their conducting parts should

be very high. In the extensive transmission system between the

power-plants at Spier Falls and Mechanicsville and the sub-stations at

Troy, Albany, and Schenectady, N. Y., a transfer switch of highly

insulated construction has been much used. The two blades of this switch

move independently of each other, but both are mounted between the same

metal clips. Each blade is of two by one-quarter inch drawn copper rod,

and the clips supporting the two blades are mounted on top of a circular

metal cap four and three-quarter inches in outside diameter and two

inches high, that is cemented over the top of a large, double petticoat,

porcelain line insulator.

[Illustration: FIG. 79.--Cross Section of Schenectady Switch-house on

Spier Falls Line.]

Clips into which these copper blades are swung in closing the switch are

also mounted in caps carried by insulators in the way just described.

Each of these insulators is mounted on a large wooden pin, and these

pins are secured in timbers at the points where the switches are wanted.

This construction of switches gives ample insulation for the line

voltage of 30,000 in this system. By means of the transfer switches

just described, either of the transmission circuits leaving the Spier

Falls power-plant may be connected to any one of the ten generators and

ten groups of transformers there. At the Saratoga switch-house, any one

of the twelve conductors, making up the four three-phase circuits from

Spier Falls may be connected to any one of the eighteen conductors

making up the six three-phase circuits that go south to Saratoga,

Watervliet, and Schenectady sub-stations, in the way indicated by the

drawing. So again at the Watervliet sub-station, where energy at 26,500

volts is received from Spier Falls and energy at 10,800 volts from

Mechanicsville, any single conductor from either of these water-power

plants may be connected, either directly or through a transformer, with

either conductor running to the railway and lighting sub-stations about

Albany and Troy. Where several transmission circuits are employed, this

complete flexibility of connection evidently adds materially to the

convenience and reliability of operation.

CIRCUITS IN TRANSMISSION LINES.

+----------------------------+------+------+------+----------+--------+

| | | | | | Cycles |

| |Length|Number|Number| Circular | per |

| Location of Lines. | in | of | of | Mils | Second |

| |Miles.|Cir- | Pole | per | of |

| | |cuits.|Lines.| Wire. |Current.|

+----------------------------+------+------+------+----------+--------+

|Electra to San Francisco | 147 | 1 | 1 |[A]471,034| 60 |

|Colgate to Oakland, Cal. | 142 | 2 | 2 | 133,100| 60 |

| | | | |[A]211,000| |

|Santa Ana River to Los | | | | | |

|Angeles | 83 | 2 | 1 | 83,690| 60 |

|Shawinigan Falls to Montreal| 85 | 1 | 1 |[A]183,750| 30 |

|Cañon Ferry to Butte | 65 | 2 | 2 | 106,500| 60 |

|Welland Canal to Hamilton | 35 | 1 | 1 | 83,690| 60 |

|Welland Canal to Hamilton | 37 | 1 | 1 | 133,100| 60 |

|Spier Falls to Schenectady | 30 | 2 | 1 | 105,600| 40 |

| | | | | 167,800| |

|Spier Falls to Watervliet, | | | | | |

|N. Y. | 35 | 2 | 1 | 167,800| 40 |

|Ogden to Salt Lake City | 36 | 2 | 1 | 83,690| 60 |

|Apple River Falls to St. | | | | | |

|Paul | 27 | 2 | 1 | 66,370| 60 |

|Niagara Falls to Buffalo | 23 | 2 | 1 | 350,000| 25 |

|Niagara Falls to Buffalo | 20 | 1 | 1 |[A]500,000| 25 |

|Farmington River to Hartford| 11 | 1 | 1 |[A]364,420| 60 |

|Niagara Falls to Toronto | 75 | 2 | 1[B]| 190,000| 25 |

+----------------------------+------+------+------+----------+--------+

[A] Aluminum conductor.

[B] Steel towers.

Electric Transmission of Water Power · 第 17 / 23 章