MR. W. W. GRENVILLE TO LORD TEMPLE.

Pall Mall, Sunday, Dec. 15th, 1782.

My dear Brother,

I am just returned from Lord Shelburne's. He appointed me

yesterday to be with him this morning, and I have had a pretty

long conversation with him on the subject of Ireland. But it was

for the most part so very general, that it is not easy to reduce

it to writing.

I began by stating under two distinct heads the original object

of my being sent here, and what had since happened. First, that

I had been commissioned to explain the grounds on which you had

wished to stand against further concessions, your reasons for

imagining it doubtful whether that ground could be maintained,

and your certain conviction that it could be done only by an

immediate dissolution of Parliament. The second point I said

was, that, by what had since happened, you apprehended that

something further was made necessary, and this was the more

evident from the manner in which every one had taken up the

business in Ireland.

These two points, of course, led us into a very wide field of

conversation. As to the dissolution, I said you certainly would

not press the Ministry for any more on the subject, than that,

even with a peace, and a remedy to the business of the King's

Bench, it should not be delayed beyond the end of January. The

great object, he said, was at all events not to meet till

October. My answer was, that to you, who were personally to meet

the difficulties of an earlier meeting, they certainly would

appear quite as strong as they could to him sitting at a

distance and speculating upon them. It was therefore by no means

a thing to be wished by you, but an evil which circumstances

might render necessary. This led me to a mention of several

causes of discontent which might arise or be sought for, and

which could only be prevented by the Irish Parliament; such as

an infringement, for instance, of the East India monopoly. We

went, at different periods of the conversation, a good deal into

this business. He threw out an idea, which he said had been

often mentioned, and for which a foundation was certainly laid

in the last resolution of the English Houses on Irish affairs,

if we chose to pursue it. This was the fixing, by a sort of

treaty, a commercial system between the two countries, and a

proportionable contribution to be paid by Ireland for the

general protection of the empire.

When I mentioned the objection to this, founded on the

impossibility that Ireland could in her present situation

contribute such a quota as would hereafter be even infinitely

too small for her share, he answered it by stating the

possibility of having a tax on some particular article or

description of articles applicable to this purpose, which might

be so fixed as to be small at present, very small if necessary,

but which might increase with the wealth and commerce of

Ireland. On this idea of a settlement, our conversation dwelt a

good deal. I expressed my opinion that it would be, in many

points of view, a measure of dignity and weight, and

particularly advantageous to both countries, as it would leave

no ground of contest unexplained. But at the same time I thought

the present moment unfavourable for such a step, because it

ought not to be taken till Government in Ireland recovered its

energy; otherwise, I stated that the wildest idea that could be

broached in a newspaper would be adopted by those in whom the

real Government of the country resides at the present moment;

that, till the Volunteers have in some degree subsided, your

Government could only subsist by expedients, painful as such an

idea must be to your feelings. I stated also, that if this was

to be held out to the country as the satisfaction and security

to which they were to look, it would set all their heads afloat

forming systems of trade and government; and that it would make

the spring meeting absolutely necessary, from the impatience it

would excite and the necessity of its being done by Parliament.

From this we went into the present situation of your Government.

Upon this he desired to explain himself, and that I would state

to you that he was _inclined to think_, not that he _thought_,

your Government would go on more easily there than you expected.

He alluded to De Retz's maxim: "_Le peuple ne se soulève jamais

que quand on l'opprime_." To the truth of this I agreed

perfectly, but said that the people there are really oppressed,

and miserable to a degree I had not at all conceived till I went

into the country. That nothing was more usual than for the

people to mistake the cause of grievances which they really

feel, and that this I apprehended to be the case there. In that

case, he said, the remedy was at hand; for that an extended

commerce and the wisdom of internal regulations, would relieve

the evil, and be a pleasant task to your Government. I answered

that such remedies must be gradual, while the situation of

Ireland was pressing at this moment; and that perhaps nothing

had contributed more to the discontents now prevalent, than the

foolish expectations of wealth to be poured like a torrent into

the country by a free trade. To this he agreed, but said that

laws might certainly be devised by which such remedies might be

brought forward and hastened. Then he went into the nature of

absentee laws. Direct absentee taxes were, he said, highly

objectionable, but many things might be thought of which would

produce the effect so reasonably to be wished, that the money

arising from land in Ireland should not be spent elsewhere. All

methods to raise the value of that land would operate to that

effect; because, when the person residing in England saw the

means of getting an equivalent, he would certainly prefer an

estate at his own door to one in Ireland. Still, however, this

would be gradual.

With respect to the Volunteer force, he apprehended less

embarrassment from them, because he could not believe that five

thousand of them would ever bring themselves to march ten miles

together. I said, perhaps not, but that they had each the means

of resisting the execution of any law they disliked in their own

places of residence; whilst your whole army did not amount,

without the Provincials, to six thousand men. And in time of

peace, the Provincials were to be disbanded, and only twelve

thousand men could be brought back upon the establishment. He

asked whether the Provincials could not be made permanent. I

said, I apprehended not, and that possibly the attempt would not

be wise; for that, although you had, by the most determined

perseverance and by an unremitted firmness, carried the point

with respect to their being raised, yet I thought that would be

sufficient to show the steadiness of Government, without seeking

unnecessary grounds of discontent.

There were many other general heads of Irish Government touched

upon in the course of the conversation, which I do not now

remember. He spoke to the reports about the situation of English

Government. I never heard any man, in the whole course of my

life, affirm any one thing more distinctly, positively, and

unequivocally, than he did, when he told me that Government were

upon a sure foundation here. He said that I was too wise to

expect him to explain to me upon what grounds he said this, but

that it was upon sure grounds; that there was a moral certainty,

and as a rational man he proceeded upon it. This language is the

more extraordinary, because the opinion of the world in general,

I might say of almost every man in London, is directly the

reverse. Either, therefore, Lord Shelburne is (not a dissembler,

but) the most abandoned and direct liar upon the face of the

earth, or he is deceived himself, too grossly to be imagined, or

the whole world besides is deceived. Which of these is the case,

time will show, and that only; but I cannot bring myself to

imagine that the first is. That he wishes you should believe him

secure, I can easily imagine, and that he wishes it very

strongly; but that he should therefore be induced to pledge

himself to so direct a falsehood, which he must know it was my

business to repeat to you, and yours to act upon, and which the

event of a few weeks must demonstrate to be false if it is so,

exceeds my utmost power of belief. That the Duke of Richmond

thinks as Lord Shelburne has expressed himself to me, is, I

apprehend, most probable, from the very strong compliments he

paid him and the flattering language he held to him in the House

of Lords on Friday. But this is mere conjecture. What is

certain, on the other hand, is that the explanation given by him

in the House of Lords of the American treaty does not tally with

that of Pitt, Townshend and Conway in the House of Commons, to

which nevertheless the three last have positively pledged their

faith and honour, that the Cabinet has been postponed because

Lord Shelburne was afraid to meet them, and that the report of

the day is that Lord Shelburne was outvoted there upon the

question of Gibraltar.

After we had gone over a great deal of conversation on these

subjects for above an hour and a half, he said that we seemed to

agree about all the points on which we had touched. I then

mentioned the two main objects--the Dissolution, and the Bill of

Satisfaction. To the dissolution, he said he imagined no

difficulty would be made to-day in the Cabinet which was to be

held; as to the other point, he saw much more objection. It cut

up the principle on which our stand had been made. People were

not ripe in England to go into the whole question again. The

moment a bill of that sort was proposed in the House of Commons,

every man would have to give his opinion on the effect of the

repeal, on the legal question, and on the right of internal and

external legislation. There never was a debate on Irish

questions in England that was not misrepresented; and this,

together with the acknowledgment of the principle of the

insufficiency of what was done last year, would put Mr. Flood on

excellent ground. To many of these objections I could not but

subscribe, for they strike me very strongly. I wished to know

from him his idea on the external legislation. He said he had

understood you, when you left England, that you was determined

never to cede that. I said, that as his Lordship referred to

conversations to which I was no party, I could only say that I

had understood you very differently. The distinction between

external and internal, he said, was a bad one, as applied to

Ireland. It was applied by Fox, who took it from Lord Chatham,

by whom it had been adopted, for want of a better expression, in

the case of America. I said, the distinction I made was a clear

one--that England could, in her own ports, restrain as she

pleased the commerce of Ireland; but that it was not in the

power of Government, after what had been done (whether wisely or

not), to enforce any English Act which was to be executed in

Ireland. He said, that this brought us back to the idea of a

settlement; and that he should be curious, and indeed it was

necessary to the subject, to know what questions about English

Acts concerning trade, and what other commercial points would

come into discussion in such a settlement. At the same time, he

said, the subject was one of those which required conversing

with people of information, and which, nevertheless, if any one

was consulted upon it, would set the heads of every one afloat.

However, he wished I would turn my thoughts to it, and let him

see the principal points. I then pressed him again upon the head

of your Bill; I thought it right to say that I was satisfied on

every other head, but that this pressed strongly on my mind. All

I wished was, that he would allow me to state to you the

difficulties, such as he had mentioned them; but at the same

time, to say, that they were overbalanced by an absolute

necessity. He said, that he would not suppose that they could be

overbalanced.

While I write this, I receive your despatches of the 12th

instant. I have immediately enclosed your letter to Townshend,

with one from myself, of which I send you a copy, and wait his

answer with impatience. I was going on, when I was interrupted

by your letters, to state to you, that my conversation with Lord

Shelburne closed with his saying that the difficulties were

capital, and that he could not believe that they could be

overbalanced. I then observed, that a Cabinet was, I understood,

to be held to-day. He said yes, and at eleven, and that it was

then half-past ten, and therefore I must excuse him. As I had

been there above an hour and a half, I could not with any

propriety stay any longer.

According to Townshend's directions to me last night, I staid at

home the whole morning, under the idea that I was to be sent

for, as it was so directed in the King's approbation for the

Cabinet being held, which Townshend showed me. Why this was not

done, whether the Cabinet has not been held, or whether Lord

Shelburne thought he had received information enough for all, I

cannot pretend to say. It is certainly unnecessary for me to

observe, that the whole of this magnificent idea about a

settlement was most probably intended to draw your attention off

from the Bill you have proposed. I could do no otherwise than

acquiesce in sending it over to you, as I had already stated my

belief, confirmed so fully by your authority, that your proposal

was necessary, and to the adoption of it, on this ground, I

meant, if I could, to have pledged him by my last question; and

although he did not accede to what I then asked, yet I think I

should not have been justified in not agreeing to state to you

his objections--which certainly have their weight, especially as

he proposed an expedient in the room of yours, though

insufficient and improper for the reasons which, as I told you

above, I mentioned to him. I forgot to state in its proper place

that I reminded him of the danger which was almost inevitable,

that some enemy to Government would take the business up, if not

immediately done by Ministry themselves.

Half-past Eleven, P.M.

I have just received the enclosed answer from Townshend; and

though it contains nothing, yet I cannot but feel too much for

your impatience to delay till Wednesday night the acknowledging

your despatches, and the assuring you that there shall be no

remissness whatever on my part to follow up this business as

much as possible, and to press it forward in this strange scene

of procrastination. Nothing can make me happier than your

approbation of my conduct, and your kind disposition to trust so

much to that most unfeigned affection with which I am,

My dearest brother,

Ever yours,

W. W. Grenville.

P.S.--I mean to-morrow to write to Lord Shelburne, stating that

you have sent over a fresh despatch to Mr. Townshend, and

referring him to that for the absolute necessity of adopting

your proposal, which still leaves room for his settlement, if it

is thought proper and expedient. The one will remove the present

difficulty, the other prevent the rise of any fresh source of

discord. But how far the latter can or ought at this time to be

taken up, is with me very doubtful. If I get on Wednesday such

an answer as I wish, you shall see me very soon.

Memoirs of the Courts and Cabinets of George the Third From the Original Family Documents, Volume 1 · 第 47 / 201 题