16. The Fatalist Luther.

Catholic writers have discovered a fatalistic tendency in Luther's

teaching of justification by faith without works. They declare that

Luther's theory of the utter depravity of man by reason of inherited sin

and his incapacity to perform any work that can be accounted good in the

sight of God kills every ambition to virtuous living in man. They argue

that when you tell a person that he is not capable to do good, he is apt

to believe you and make no effort to perform a good deed. The situation

becomes still worse when the divine predestination is introduced at this

point, as has been done, they say, by Luther. If God has determined all

things beforehand by a sovereign decree, if there really is no such

thing as human choice, and all things occur according to a foreordained

plan, man no longer has any responsibility. He is reduced to an

automaton. Free will is denied him; he cannot elect by voluntary choice

to engage in any God-pleasing action; for he is told that his natural

reason is blinded by sin and his understanding darkened, rendering it

impossible for him to discern good and evil, and leading him constantly

into errors of judgment on what is right or wrong, while he is made to

believe that his will is enslaved by evil lusts and passions, ever prone

to wickedness and averse to godliness. As a consequence, it is claimed,

man must necessarily become morally indifferent: he will not fight

against sin nor follow after righteousness, because he has become

convinced that it is useless for him to make any effort either in the

one direction or in the other. The doctrine of man's natural depravity

and the divine foreordination of all things, it is held, must drive man

either to despair, insanity, and suicide, or land him hopelessly in

fatalism: he will simply continue his physical life in a mechanical way,

like a brute or a plant; he merely vegetates.

These fatal tendencies which are charged against Luther are refuted by

no one more effectually than by Luther himself. As regards the doctrine

of original sin and man's natural depravity, Luther preached that with

apostolic force and precision. That doctrine is a Bible-doctrine. No

person has read his Bible aright, no expounder of Scripture has begun to

explain the divine plan of salvation for sinners, if he has failed to

find this teaching in the Bible. This doctrine is, indeed, extremely

humiliating to the pride of man; it opens up appalling views of the

misery of the human race under sin. We can understand why men would want

to get away from this doctrine. But no one confers any benefit on men by

minimizing the importance of the Bible-teaching, or by weakening the

statements of Scripture regarding this matter. Any teaching which admits

the least good quality in man by which he can prepare or dispose himself

so as to induce God to view him with favor is a contradiction of the

passages of Scripture which were cited in a previous chapter, and works

a delusion upon men that will prove just as fatal as when a physician

withholds from his patient the full knowledge of his critical condition.

Yea, it is worse; for a physician who is not frank and sincere to his

patient may deprive the latter of his physical life, but the

teacher of God's Word who instils in men false notions of their moral

and spiritual power robs them of life eternal.

Luther avoided this error. He led men to a true estimate of themselves

as they are by nature. But over and against the fell power of sin he

magnified the greater power of divine grace. "Where sin abounded, grace

hath much more abounded" (Rom. 5, 20),--along this line Luther found the

solution for the awful difficulty which confronts every man when he

studies the Bible-doctrine of original sin, and when he discovers,

moreover, that this Bible-doctrine is borne out fully by his own

experience. Just for this reason, because man can do nothing to restore

himself to the divine favor, God by His grace proposes to do all, and

has sent His Son in the likeness of sinful flesh to do all, and, last

not least, publishes the fact that all has been done in the Gospel of

the forgiveness of sin by grace through faith in Christ. Luther has

taught men to confess: "I believe that I cannot by my own reason or

strength believe in Jesus Christ or come to Him," but he taught them

also to follow up this true confession with the other: "The Holy Ghost

has called me by the Gospel, enlightened me with His gifts, sanctified

and kept me in the true faith."

The Gospel is called in the Scriptures "the Word of Life," not only

because it speaks of the life everlasting which God has prepared for His

children, but also because it gives life. It approaches man, dead in

trespasses and sins, and quickens him into new life. It removes from the

mind of man its natural blindness and from the will of man its innate

impotency. It regenerates all the dead powers of the soul, and makes man

walk in newness of life. The difficulty which original sin has created

is not greater than the means and instruments which God has provided for

coping with it. "God hath concluded all in unbelief, that He might have

mercy on all." (Rom. 11, 32.)

This is the only true salvation, every other is fictitious. It teaches

man both to face the fearful odds against him because of his corruption,

and to relish all the more the points in his favor by reason of God's

redeeming and regenerating grace. It starts its work with crushing man's

pride and self-confidence utterly, and hurling him into the abyss of

despair, but it lifts him out of despair with a mighty power that breaks

the power of evil in him. This change is brought about in such a gentle,

tender way that the sinner has no sensation of being coerced into the

new life by some farce which he cannot resist. It wins him over to God

and his Christ in spite of his resistance, and makes out of his

unwilling heart a willing one, which gladly coincides with the leadings

of grace.

The Roman scheme of salvation might be called the ostrich method: it

teaches men the foolish strategy of the bird of the desert, which hides

its head in the sand when it sees an enemy approaching, and then

imagines the enemy does not exist. Original sin may be disputed out of

the Bible by a false interpretation, but it is not thereby ruled out of

existence. When face to face with his God--if no sooner, then in the

hour of death--every man feels that he is utterly corrupt and worthless,

and he will curse any teacher that caused him to believe otherwise. Free

will is not created by assertions. Let the apostles of free will only

try, and they will find out that their freedom is nil. Catholics

denounce Luther for having declared the free will of man to be nothing

than a word without substance: we hear the sound when the word is

pronounced, and grasp its grammatical meaning, but we do not realize it

in ourselves. Every person, however, who has truly come to know himself

will side with Luther, or rather with the Bible. Furthermore, to the

same extent to which the Roman view exalts man's natural powers for

good, it lowers and limits the work of Christ and the Holy Spirit, and

begets a false confidence and security that is rudely shaken when the

first slip and fall occurs in the person's Christian life. He has never

really laid hold of the grace of God, because he has not been taught to

trust only to the grace of God to lead and preserve him in the way of

life. He will begin to distrust the Gospel as a very inefficient

instrument, and this will lead him to become indifferent to it, and

finally fall away from it entirely. A real danger of apostasy and

despair exists wherever the Roman dogma of man's natural free will is

proclaimed.

It is, however, doing Luther a flagrant injustice when he is made to

deny that man has no longer any natural reason and will in the secular

affairs of this life. Luther used to divide the entire life of man into

two hemispheres, the upper embracing man's relation to God, holy things,

the interests of the soul here and hereafter, and the lower, embracing

the purely human, temporal, and secular interests of man. It is only in

the higher hemisphere that Luther denies the existence of free will.

Throughout his writings Luther asserts the existence, the actual

operation, and the necessity of human free will, though sadly weakened

by sin, in the affairs of this present life. It will be sufficient to

cite as evidence the Augsburg Confession which was drawn up with

Luther's aid and submitted to Emperor Charles V in 1530 as the joint

belief of Luther and his followers. "Of the Freedom of the Will," say

the Protestant confessors, "they teach that man's will has some liberty

for the attainment of civil righteousness and for the choice of things

subject to reason. Nevertheless, it has not power, without the Holy

Ghost, to work the righteousness of God, that is, spiritual

righteousness, since the natural man receiveth not the things of the

Spirit of God (1 Cor. 2, 14); but this righteousness is wrought in the

heart when the Holy Ghost is received through the Word. These things are

said in as many words by Augustine in his _Hypognosticon_ (Book III):

'We grant that all men have a certain freedom of will in judging

according to natural reason; not such freedom, however, whereby it is

capable, without God, either to begin, much less to complete aught in

things pertaining to God, but only in works of this life, whether good

or evil. "Good" I call those works which spring from the good in Nature,

that is, to have a will to labor in the field, to eat and drink, to have

a friend, to clothe oneself, to build a house, to marry, to keep cattle,

to learn divers useful arts, or whatsoever good pertains to this life,

none of which things are without dependence on the providence of God;

yea, of Him and through Him they are and have their beginning. "Evil" I

call such things as, to have a will to worship an idol, to commit

murder,' etc." (Art. 18.)

Luther has always held that there is a natural intelligence and wisdom,

a natural will-power and energy which men employ in their daily

occupations, their trades and professions, their trade and commerce,

their literature and art, their culture and refinement, yea, that there

is also a natural knowledge of God even among the Gentiles, who yet

"know not God," and a seeming performance of the things which God has

commanded. But these natural abilities do not reach into the higher

hemisphere; they cannot pass muster at the bar of divine justice. They

do not spring from right motives, nor do they aim at right ends; they

are determined by man's self-interest. They come short of that glory

which God ought to receive from worshipers in spirit and in truth (Rom.

3, 23; John 4, 23); they are evil in as far as they are the corrupt

fruits of corrupt trees. In condemning the moral quality of these

natural works of civil righteousness, Luther has said no more than

Christ and His apostles have said.

Luther taught the Bible-doctrine that there is in God a hidden will

which He has reserved to His majesty (Dent. 29); that His judgments are

unsearchable and His ways past finding out (Rom. 11, 33); that not even

a sparrow falls to the ground without His will, and that the very hairs

of our head are numbered (Matt. 10, 29. 30); that no evil can occur

anywhere without His permission (Amos 3, 6; Is. 45, 7). To deny these

truths is to reject the Bible and to destroy the sovereign omniscience

and omnipotence of God. Those who attack Luther for believing that also

the evil in this world is related to God will have to change their bill

of indictment: their charge is really directed against Scripture. Luther

has, however, warned men not to attempt a study of this secret will of

God, for the plain reason that it is secret, and it would be blasphemous

presumption to try and find it out. All our dealings with God must be on

the basis of His revealed will. If we only will study that, we will be

fully occupied our whole life.

As regards the Scriptural doctrine of predestination, that those who

ultimately attain to the life everlasting have been chosen to that end,

Luther has warned men not to study this doctrine outside of Christ and

the Gospel. God has told His children for their comfort amid the

vicissitudes of this life that He has secured their eternal happiness

against all dangers, but He has not asked them, nor does He permit them,

to find out _a priori_ whether this or that person is elect. Jesus

Christ is the Book of Life in which the elect are to find their names

recorded, and in the general way of salvation through repentance, faith,

and sanctification of life they are to be led to the heritage of the

saints in light. In his summary of the ninth, tenth, and eleventh

chapters of Romans, Luther states that by His eternal election God has

taken our salvation entirely out of our hands and placed it in His own

hands. "And this is most highly necessary. For we are so feeble and

fickle that, if salvation depended upon us, not a person would be saved;

the devil would overcome them all. But since God is reliable and His

election cannot fail or be thwarted by any one, we still have hope over

and against sin. But at this point a limit must be fixed for the

presumptuous spirits who soar too high. They lead their reason first to

this subject, they start at the pinnacle, they want to explore first the

abyss of the divine election, and wrestle vainly with the question

whether they are elect. These people bring about their own overthrow:

they are either driven to despair or become reckless.--Follow the order

of this Epistle: First, occupy yourself with Christ and the Gospel, in

order that you may learn to know your sin and His grace; next, begin to

wrestle with your sin, as chapters 1-8 teach you to do. Then, after you

have reached the doctrine concerning crosses and tribulations in the

eighth chapter, you will rightly learn the doctrine of election in

chapters 9-11, because you will realize what a comfort this doctrine

contains. For the doctrine of election can be studied without injury and

secret anger against God only by those who have passed through

suffering, crosses, and anguish of death. Accordingly, the old Adam in

you must be dead before you can bear this subject and drink this strong

wine. See that you do not drink wine while you are still a babe. There

is a proper time, age, and manner for propounding the various doctrines

of God to men." What is there fatalistic about this?

Luther Examined and Reexamined A Review of Catholic Criticism and a Plea for Revaluation · 第 17 / 30 题