So there were Corydon and Thyrsis, more fast in the trap than ever.

Corydon and her baby were staying with her parents; while Thyrsis lived

in a lodginghouse, this time up in Harlem. He was not permitted to see

his wife whom he could not support. He had not seen his son for six

months, and was naturally, anxious to know what that son looked like. It

was arranged between the young parents that the Negro maid who took care

of the child should wheel the baby carriage to a certain spot in Central

Park at a certain hour of the afternoon, and Thyrsis would be there and

watch the little one go by. The father kept the appointed tryst, and

there came a Negro nursemaid, wheeling a baby carriage, and the father

gazed therein and beheld a horrifying spectacle--a red-headed infant

with a flat nose and a pimply skin. The father went away, sick at

soul--until he had the inspiration to send a telegram, and received an

answer informing him that the nursemaid had been prevented from coming.

The lodginghouse where Thyrsis had a room was kept by an elderly widow

who had invested her little property in United States Steel common and

had seen it go down to six dollars. As fellow lodgers, there was the

father of Thyrsis, who was drinking more and more; and that Uncle Harry

who had almost reached the stage where he put a bullet through his

brain. Meanwhile, the uncle considered it his duty to give worldly-wise

advice to a haggard young author who refused to “go to work.” The mother

of Thyrsis, distracted, kept repeating the same formula; half a dozen

other occupants of the lodginghouse, broker’s clerks, and other

commercial persons, took an interest in the problem and said their say.

Such was the life of a would-be prophet in a business world! So that

winter I wrote the most ferocious of my stories, _A Captain of

Industry_, which became a popular item in the list of the State

Publishing House of Soviet Russia. The manuscript was submitted to the

Macmillans, and the president of that concern was kind enough to let me

see the opinion of one of his readers. “What is the matter with this

young author?” was the opening sentence. The answer of course was that

the young author was unable to get enough to eat.

Critics of _Arthur Stirling_ and of _Love’s Pilgrimage_ complain of the

too-idealistic characters portrayed, the lack of redeeming weaknesses in

the hero. Let the deficiency be supplied by one detail--that during that

dreadful winter I discovered my vice. Living in these sordid

surroundings, desperate, and utterly without companionship, I was now

and then invited to play cards with some of my fellow lodgers. I had

played cards as a boy, but never for money; now I would “sit in” at a

poker game with the young broker’s clerks and other commercial persons

with whom fate had thrown me.

So I discovered a devastating emotion; I was gripped by a dull, blind

frenzy of greed and anxiety, and was powerless to break its hold. The

game was what is called penny ante, and the stakes were pitifully small,

yet they represented food for that week. I cannot recall that I ever

won, but I lost a dollar or two on several occasions. I remember that on

Christmas Eve I started playing after dinner, and sat at a table in a

half-warmed room gray with tobacco smoke until two or three in the

morning; the following afternoon I began playing again and played all

night. So it appeared that I was an orthodox Southern gentleman, born to

be a gambler! After that Christmas experience I took a vow, and have

never played cards for money since that time.

X

Not all the humiliation, rage, and despair could keep new literary plans

from forming themselves, colossal and compelling. Now it was to be a

trilogy of novels, nothing less. Ecstasy was taking the form of battles,

marches, and sieges, titanic efforts of the collective soul of America.

_Manassas_, _Gettysburg_, and _Appomattox_ were to be the titles of

these mighty works, and by contemplation of the heroism and glory of the

past, America was to be redeemed from the sordidness and shame of the

present. The problem was to find some one capable of appreciating such a

literary service, and willing to make it possible.

I went up to Boston, headquarters of the culture that I meant to

glorify. I stayed with my cousin, Howard Bland, then a student at

Harvard, and devoted myself to the double task of getting local color

and an endowment. I succeeded in the first part only. Thomas Wentworth

Higginson had read _Springtime and Harvest_, and he introduced me to

what was left of the old guard of the abolitionists; I remember several

visits to Frank B. Sanborn and one to Julia Ward Howe. I went to a

reunion of a Grand Army post and heard stories from the veterans--though

not much of this was needed, as the Civil War has been so completely

recorded in books, magazines, and newspapers. I inspected reverently the

Old Boston landmarks and shrines; for I had exchanged my Virginia ideals

for those of Massachusetts and was intending to portray the Civil War

from the Yankee point of view.

I thought Boston ought to be interested and warm-hearted. Why was Boston

so cold? Perfectly polite, of course, and willing to invite a young

novelist to tea and listen to his account of the great work he was

planning; but when the question was broached, would anyone advance five

hundred dollars to make possible the first volume of such a trilogy,

they all with one accord began to make excuses. Among those interviewed

I remember Edwin D. Mead, the pacifist, and Edwin Ginn, the schoolbook

publisher, a famous philanthropist. Mr. Ginn explained that he had

ruined the character of a nephew by giving him money, and had decided

that it was the worst thing one could do for the young. In vain I sought

to persuade him that there might be differences among the young.

It was in New York that a man was found, able to realize that a writer

has to eat while writing. George D. Herron was his name, and he happened

to be a socialist, a detail of great significance in the young writer’s

life. But that belongs to the next chapter; this one has to do with the

fate of Corydon and Thyrsis, and what poverty and failure did to their

love. Suffice it for the moment to say that the new friend advanced a

couple of hundred dollars and promised thirty dollars a month, this

being Thyrsis’ estimate of what he would need to keep himself and wife

and baby in back-to-nature fashion during the year it would take to

write _Manassas_. The place selected was Princeton, New Jersey, because

that university possessed the second-largest Civil War collection in the

country--the largest being in the Library of Congress. So in May 1903

the migration took place, and for three years and a half Princeton was

home.

XI

On the far side of a ridge three miles north of the town, a patch of

woods was found whose owner was willing to rent it as a literary

encampment. The tent had been shipped from Canada, and a platform was

built, and an outfit of wooden shelves and tables. Also there was a

smaller tent, eight feet square, for the secret sessions with Clio, muse

of history. Both canvas structures were provided with screen doors,

against the inroads of the far-famed Jersey mosquito. Water was brought

in pails from a farmer’s well, and once a week a horse and buggy were

hired for a drive to town--to purchase supplies, and exchange one load

of books about the Civil War for another load.

_Manassas: A Novel of the War_--so ran the title; the dedication said:

“That the men of this land may know the heritage that is come down to

them.” The young historian found himself a stamping ground in the woods,

a place where he could pace back and forth for hours undisturbed, and

there the scenes of the dreadful “new birth of freedom” lived themselves

over in his mind. The men of that time came to him and spoke in their

own persons, and with trembling and awe he wrote down their actions and

words.

His method of working had evolved itself into this: he would go through

a scene in his imagination, over and over again, until he knew it by

heart, before setting down a word of it on paper. An episode like the

battle scene of _Manassas_, some ten thousand words in length, took

three weeks in gestation; the characters and incidents were hardly out

of the writer’s mind for a waking moment during that time, nor did the

emotional tension of their presence relax. And in between these bouts of

writing there was reading and research in the literature of sixty years

past: newspapers, magazines, pamphlets, works of biography and

reminiscence. The writing of _Manassas_ must have entailed the reading

of five hundred volumes, and the consulting of as many more.

In the meantime Corydon took care of the baby, a youngster of a year

and a half, who seemed to know exactly what he wanted and would yell

himself purple in the face to get it; the inexperienced young parents

sometimes wondered whether he would kill himself by such efforts. During

his incarceration in the city the child had suffered from rickets, and

now a “child specialist” had outlined an extremely elaborate diet, which

took hours of the young mother’s time to prepare. Under it the infant

throve and became yet more aggressive.

Corydon and Thyrsis had wanted nothing but to be together; and now they

had what they wanted--almost too much of it. Now and then they met the

farmer and his wife, a gentle old couple; when they drove to Princeton,

they met the clerks in the stores and in the college library; they met

no one else. Possibly some women could have stood this long ordeal, but

Corydon was not of that tough fiber. While her husband went apart to

wrestle with his angel, she stayed in the tent to wrestle with demons.

She suffered from depression and melancholy, and it was impossible to

know whether the trouble was of the mind or of the body.

Nowadays, every disciple of Freud in Greenwich Village would know what

to tell her. But this was in the days before the invention of the

Freudian demonology. Birth control, as explained by a family doctor, had

failed, and could not be trusted; since another pregnancy would have

meant the death of the young writer’s hopes, there was no safety but in

returning to the original idea of brother and sister. Since caressing

led to sexual impulse, and therefore to discontent, it was necessary

that caressing should be omitted from the daily program, and love-making

be confined to noble words and the reading aloud of Civil War

literature. Thyrsis could do that, being completely absorbed in his

vision. Whether Corydon could do it or not was a superfluous

question--since Corydon _had_ to do it. This was, of course, a cruelty,

and prepared the way for a tragedy.

XII

_Prince Hagen_, after having been declined by seventeen magazines and

twenty-two publishing houses, had been brought out by a firm in Boston

and, as usual, disappointed its author’s hopes. But there came one or

two hundred dollars in royalties, almost enough to pay for the building

of a house. An old carpenter and his son drove from the village, and

Thyrsis worked with them and learned a trade. In two or three weeks they

built a cabin on the edge of the woods, sixteen feet by eighteen, with a

living room across the front and a tiny bedroom and kitchen in the back.

It was roofed with tar paper, and the total cost was two hundred and

fifty-six dollars. Ten per cent of this price was earned by the device

of writing an article about the homemade dwelling and selling it to the

_World’s Work_, for the benefit of other young authors contemplating

escape from civilization. The baby, now two years old, watched the

mighty men at work, and thereafter the problem of his upbringing was

solved; all that was necessary was to put him out of doors with a block

of wood, a hammer, and a supply of nails, and he would bang nails into

the wood with perfect contentment for hours.

But the problem of the young mother was less easy of solution. Winter

came howling from the north and smote the little cabin on the exposed

ridge. Snow blocked the roads, and walking became impossible for a woman

tired by housework. She could get to town in a sleigh, but there was no

place to stay in town with a baby; and what became of the woman’s

diversion of shopping, when the family had only thirty dollars a month

to live on? There occurred the episode of the turkey-red table cover. It

was discovered as a bargain in a notion store, price thirty cents, and

Corydon craved it as one pitiful trace of decoration in their home of

bare lumber. She bought it, but Thyrsis was grim and implacable,

insisting that it be folded up and taken back. Thirty cents was a day’s

food for a family, and if they ran up bills at the stores, how would the

soul of America be saved?

Sickness came, of course. Whether you were rich or poor in America in

those days, you were subject to colds and sore throats, because you knew

nothing about diet, and ate denatured foods out of packages and cans.

Corydon had obscure pains, and doctors gave obscure opinions about “womb

trouble.” She paid a dollar a bottle for Lydia Pinkham’s Vegetable

Compound, which was supposed to remedy “female complaints,” and did

so--by the method of dulling the victim’s sensations with opium. The

time came when Thyrsis awakened one winter night and heard his wife

sobbing, and found her sitting up in bed in the moonlight, with a

revolver in her hand, something she kept for protection while her

husband was working in the college library. She had been trying for

hours to get up courage to put a bullet into her head, but did not have

that courage.

XIII

The grip of dreadful winter was broken, and it was possible to walk once

more. Flowers blossomed in the woods, and also in the two tormented

souls. For the great novel had been completed, and this time it was

promptly accepted. The great firm of Macmillan called it a distinguished

piece of fiction, paid five hundred dollars advance upon it, and agreed

to publish it in the autumn. So it was possible for the little family to

buy a turkey-red table cover, and also a vase to fill with woodland

flowers, and to get the horse and buggy more frequently--one dollar per

afternoon--and drive to town and ramble about the campus and listen to

the students singing their songs at twilight.

A town full of handsome young college men was a not disagreeable place

of residence for the girl-wife of a solitary genius, condemned by grim

fate to celibacy. It was not long before Corydon had met a young

instructor of science who lived only a mile or two away on the ridge. He

came to call; having horse and buggy, he took Corydon driving, and she

would come back from these drives refreshed and enlivened. Life became

still more promising.

Presently the time came when she told her preoccupied husband a quaint

and naïve story of what had happened. The young instructor had admitted,

shyly and humbly, that he was falling somewhat in love with her. It was

innocent and idyllic, quite touching; and Thyrsis was moved--he could

understand easily how anyone might fall in love with Corydon, for he had

done so himself. He was glad it was so noble and high-minded; but he

suggested, very gently, that it would be the part of wisdom not to go

driving with the young man any more. Corydon was surprised and pained by

this; but after a few more drives she admitted that it might indeed be

wiser.

So again she was lonely for a while; until it happened that in the

course of her search for health, she encountered a high-minded and

handsome young surgeon, a Scotchman. Strangely enough, the same thing

happened again; the surgeon admitted, shyly and humbly, that he was

falling somewhat in love with his patient; this time he himself

suggested that it would be wiser if he did not see her any more. Corydon

told Thyrsis all about it, and it was excellent material for a would-be

novelist who lived a retired life and had few experiences of romantic

emotions. But in the end, the novelty wore off--it happened too many

times.

_5_

_Revolt_

I

Floyd Dell, contemplating his biography of myself, which was published

in 1927, asked me to explain the appearance of a social rebel in a

conventional Southern family. I thought the problem over and reported my

psychology as that of a “poor relation.” It had been my fate from

earliest childhood to live in the presence of wealth that belonged to

others.

Let me say at once that I have no idea of blaming my relatives. They

were always kind to me; their homes were open to me, and when I came, I

was a member of the family. Nor do I mean that I was troubled by

jealousy. I mean merely that all my life I was faced by the contrast

between riches and poverty, and thereby impelled to think and to ask

questions. “Mamma, why are some children poor and others rich? How can

that be fair?” I plagued my mother’s mind with the problem, and never

got any answer. Since then I have plagued the ruling-class apologists of

the world with it, and still have no answer.

The other factor in my revolt--odd as it may seem--was the Protestant

Episcopal Church. I really took the words of Jesus seriously, and when I

carried the train of Bishop Potter in a confirmation ceremony in the

Church of the Holy Communion, I thought I was helping to glorify the

rebel carpenter, the friend of the poor and lowly, the symbol of human

brotherhood. Later, I read in the papers that the bishop’s wife had had

fifty thousand dollars’ worth of jewels stolen, and had set the police

to hunting for the thief. I couldn’t understand how a bishop’s wife

could own fifty thousand dollars’ worth of jewels, and the fact stuck in

my mind, and had a good deal to do with the fading away of my churchly

ardor.

From the age of perhaps seventeen to twenty-two, I faced our

civilization of class privilege absolutely alone in my own mind; that is

to say, whatever I found wrong with this civilization, I thought that I

alone knew it, and the burden of changing it rested upon my spirit. Such

was the miracle that capitalist education had been able to perform upon

my young mind during the eleven or twelve years that it had charge of

me. It could not keep me from realizing that the rule of society by

organized greed was an evil thing; but it managed to keep me from

knowing that there was anybody else in the world who thought as I did;

it managed to make me regard the current movements, Bryanism and

Populism, which sought to remedy this evil, as vulgar, noisy, and

beneath my cultured contempt.

I knew, of course, that there had been a socialist movement in Europe; I

had heard vaguely about Bismarck persecuting these malcontents. Also, I

knew there had been dreamers and cranks who had gone off and lived in

colonies, and that they “busted up” when they faced the practical

problems of life. While emotionally in revolt against Mammon worship, I

was intellectually a perfect little snob and tory. I despised modern

books without having read them, and I expected social evils to be

remedied by cultured and well-mannered gentlemen who had been to college

and acquired noble ideals. That is as near as I can come to describing

the jumble of notions I had acquired by combining John Ruskin with

Godkin of the New York _Evening Post_, and Shelley with Dana of the New

York _Sun_.

It happened that I knew about anarchists because of the execution of the

Haymarket martyrs when I was ten years old. In the “chamber of horrors”

of the Eden Musée, a place of waxworks, I saw a group representing these

desperados sitting round a table making bombs. I swallowed these bombs

whole, and shuddered at the thought of depraved persons who inhabited

the back rooms of saloons, jeered at God, practiced free love, and

conspired to blow up the government. In short, I believed in 1889 what

ninety-five per cent of America believes in 1962.

II

Upon my return to New York in the autumn of 1902, after the writing of

_Arthur Stirling_, I met in the office of the _Literary Digest_ a tall,

soft-voiced, and gentle-souled youth by the name of Leonard D. Abbott;

he was a socialist, so he told me, and he thought I might be interested

to know something about that movement. He gave me a couple of pamphlets

and a copy of _Wilshire’s Magazine_.

It was like the falling down of prison walls about my mind; the amazing

discovery, after all those years, that I did not have to carry the whole

burden of humanity’s future upon my two frail shoulders! There were

actually others who understood; who saw what had gradually become dear

to me, that the heart and center of the evil lay in leaving the social

treasure, which nature had created and which every man has to have in

order to live, to become the object of a scramble in the market place, a

delirium of speculation. The principal fact the socialists had to teach

me was that they themselves existed.

One of the pamphlets I read was by George D. Herron; it moved me to deep

admiration, and when I took it to my editor and critic, Paul Elmer More,

it moved him to the warmest abhorrence. I wrote to Herron, telling him

about myself, and the result was an invitation to dinner and a very

curious and amusing experience.

I was in no condition to dine out, for my shoes were down at the heel,

and my only pair of detachable cuffs were badly frayed; but I supposed

that a socialist dinner would be different, so I went to the address

given, a hotel on West Forty-fourth Street. I found myself in an

apartment of extreme elegance, with marble statuary and fine paintings;

I was received by a black-bearded gentleman in evening dress and Windsor

tie--a combination I had never heard of before--and by an elegant lady

in a green velvet Empire gown with a train. One other guest appeared, a

small man with a black beard and mustache trimmed to sharp points, and

twinkling mischievous eyes--for all the world the incarnation of

Mephistopheles, but without the tail I had seen him wearing at the

Metropolitan Opera House. “Comrade Wilshire,” said my host, and I

realized that this was the editor of the magazine I had been reading.

We four went down into the dining room of the hotel, and I noted that

everybody in the room turned to stare at us, and did not desist even

after we were seated. Dinner was ordered, and presently occurred a

little domestic comedy that I, the son of an extremely proper mother,

was able to comprehend. The waiter served our meat, set the vegetables

on the table, and went away to fetch something else. I saw my host look

longingly at a platter of peas that lay before him; I saw his hand start

to move, and then he glanced at his wife, and the wife frowned; so the

hand drew back, and we waited until the waiter came and served us our

peas in proper fashion.

Before long I learned the tragic story of my new friend. A

Congregational clergyman of Grinnell, Iowa, he had converted a rich

woman to socialism, and she had endowed a chair in Grinnell College for

him. Being an unhappily married man, he had fallen in love with the rich

woman’s daughter, and had refused to behave as clergymen were supposed

to behave in such a crisis. Instead, he had behaved like a resident of

Fifth Avenue and Newport; that is to say, he had proposed to his wife

that she divorce him and let him marry the woman he loved. There ensued

a frightful scandal, fanned red hot by the gutter press, and Herron had

to give up his professorship. Here he was in New York, with his new wife

and her mother, preaching to the labor movement instead of to the

churches and the colleges.

An abnormally sensitive man, he had been all but killed by the fury of

the assault upon him, and before long I persuaded him to go abroad and

live and do his writing. He went, but not much writing materialized.

During World War I he swallowed the British propaganda as I did, and

became a confidential agent of Woodrow Wilson in Switzerland, and made

promises to the Germans that Wilson did not keep; so poor Herron died

another death. His book, _The Defeat in the Victory_, told the story of

his despair for mankind.

He was a strange combination of moral sublimity and human frailty. I

won’t stop for details here, but will merely pay the personal tribute

that is due. I owe to George D. Herron my survival as a writer. At the

moment when I was completely exhausted and blocked in every direction,

I appealed to him; I gave him _Arthur Stirling_ and the manuscript of

_Prince Hagen_, and told him about _Manassas_, which I wanted to write.

I had tried the public and got no response; I had tried the leading

colleges and universities, to see if they would give a fellowship to a

creative writer; I had tried eminent philanthropists--all in vain. Now I

tried a socialist, and for the first time found a comrade. Herron

promised me money and kept the promise--altogether about eight hundred

dollars. How I could have lived and written _Manassas_ without that

money I am entirely unable to imagine.

III

The Autobiography of Upton Sinclair · 第 8 / 29 段