Martin died in 1786, and Knipfer left soon afterwards. A Frenchman was

now engaged, whose services proved also beneficial to the works. This

was Pierre Cloostermans, "a skilful man, well versed in the manufacture

of porcelain pastes, as well as in painting and decorating them."

Cloostermans, however, was much molested by the envy of the Spanish

workmen at Alcora, as well as by their typical intolerance in matters of

religion, although the Count, his master, behaved towards him with the

utmost kindness. Under his supervision, the quality of Alcora ware was

notably improved. Figures and groups of many kinds were attempted, and

even Wedgwood jasper ware was creditably imitated. In 1789, among other

pottery that was sent to Madrid were "two hard paste porcelain cups,

adorned with low relief in the English style." The most important one

was moulded by Francisco Garcés, the garlands and low reliefs by Joaquín

Ferrer, sculptor, the flowers on the covers by an apprentice, helped by

Cloostermans.

Dated in the same year (1789), Riaño quotes an interesting letter from

the Count of Aranda to Don Pedro Abadia, his steward. "I wish," he said,

"to export the porcelain of my manufactory, but chiefly in common

objects, such as cups of different kinds, tea and coffee services, etc.

These may be varied in form and colour, the principal point being that

the paste should bear hot liquids, for we Spaniards above everything

wish that nothing we buy should ever break. By no means let time be

wasted in making anything that requires much loss of time. The chief

object is that the pastes should be of first-rate excellence and

durability."

In 1793 Cloostermans was driven from the country by political

disturbances; but he was allowed to return in 1795, and resumed his

duties at the factory. All through these years Alcora continued to make

most excellent pottery. Essays were made with foreign earths, as well as

with the best that could be found in Spain. About this time kaolin was

discovered in Cataluña, and the Count was particularly anxious that this

native product should be utilised at Alcora. "The kaolin of Cataluña,"

he wrote in 1790, "may be good or bad, but it is acknowledged to be

kaolin, and if we do not employ it I must close my works."

The Count of Aranda and Pierre Cloostermans both died in 1798, and in

1800 the Duke of Hijar became the manager and proprietor of the

potteries. "Two hundred workmen were employed, and pottery of every

description was made, common earthenware, pipeclays in imitation of the

English ones, and porcelain in small quantities; common wares were made

in large quantities; the pipeclays were pronounced superior to the

English in brilliancy, but were so porous that they were easily stained.

A large number of snuff-boxes and other small objects belong to this

period."--(Riaño.)

In the early years of the nineteenth century Alcora ware deteriorated

not a little. This decline was further aggravated by the French

invasion; and although an attempt was subsequently made to revive the

industry by bringing craftsmen from the porcelain factory of Madrid, it

suffered fresh relapses and produced henceforward little but the

commonest kinds of ware. "This system," says Riaño, "continued until

1858, when the Duke of Hijar sold the manufactory to Don Ramón Girona,

who brought over English workmen from Staffordshire in order to improve

the wares. Many imitations of the older styles have also been made at

Alcora of late years."

Riaño appends instructive tables, which I copy in Appendix I, of every

kind of pottery manufactured at Alcora. He also believes that a great

deal of pottery which was formerly thought to proceed from French or

English factories is really of Alcora make, including "a great quantity

of objects of white pipeclay porcelain which have been found of late

years in Spain. They have hitherto been classified by amateurs as Leeds

pottery. We find, in papers relating to Alcora, that a decided

distinction is made between white and straw-coloured pottery. This

indication may be sufficient to distinguish it from English wares."

The celebrated Royal Porcelain Factory of the Buen Retiro at Madrid,

formerly situated in the public gardens of that name and popularly known

as the "Fabrica de la China," was founded in 1759 by Charles the Third,

who erected a vast edifice for this purpose, and filled it with a

multitude of workmen and their families, including two hundred and

twenty-five persons whom he brought over from his other factory of

Capo-di-Monte in Italy. He also transferred a great part of the

material.[101] The cost of the new works amounted to eleven and a half

millions of _reales_, and they were terminated in 1764. The cost of

keeping up the factory is stated by Larruga to have amounted to three

millions of _reales_ yearly. The first directors were Juan Tomás

Bonicelli and Domingo Bonicelli, and the first modellers-in-chief and

superintendents, possessing the secrets of the fabrication

(_secretistas_), were Cayetano Schepers and Carlos Gricci.

[101] On September 11th, 1759, the king wrote to his Secretary of

State, Richard Wall:--"The workmen and utensils of the Royal

Porcelain Manufactory of Capo-di-Monte must also be sent from

Naples to Alicante, in the vessels prepared for this purpose, in

order to proceed from Alicante to Madrid. The necessary

conveyances are to be provided, and the expenses to be charged to

his Majesty's account."

Riaño says that every kind of porcelain was made at the Buen Retiro,

"hard and soft paste, white china, glazed or unglazed, or painted and

modelled in the style of Capo-di-Monte." A great many objects existed

imitating the blue jasper ware of Wedgwood, and they also made flowers,

coloured and biscuit, groups (Pl. lxxi.), and single figures, and

painted porcelain of different kinds. Great quantities of tiles for

pavements were also made there, which may still be seen at the Casa del

Labrador at Aranjuez: they are mentioned in the accounts which exist at

the Ministry of Finance for 1807 and 1808. We find in these same

accounts interesting details of the objects made monthly. In January,

1808, a large number of figures were made, including 151 heads for the

table centre which was made for the king, 306 objects ornamented with

paintings, 2506 tiles, 577 objects of less artistic importance, such as

dishes, plates, etc. The finest specimens which exist are in the

Neapolitan style, and are two rooms at the palaces of Madrid and

Aranjuez, of which the walls are completely covered with China plaques

and looking-glasses, modelled in the most admirable manner with figures,

fruits, and flowers. The room at Aranjuez is covered with a bold

ornamentation of figures in the Japanese style, in high relief, painted

with colours and gold with the most exquisite details. The figures unite

the fine Italian modelling with the Japanese decoration. The chandelier

is in the same style (Plate lxxii.). Upon a vase on the wainscot to the

right of the entrance door is the following inscription:--

JOSEPH

GRICCI

DELINEAV^{it}

ET

SCUL^{it}

1763.

This same date is repeated in the angles, and in some shields near the

roof we find,

"AÑO

1765;

probably the year the work was terminated."

[Illustration: LXXII

ROOM DECORATED WITH PORCELAIN OF THE BUEN RETIRO

(_Royal Palace of Aranjuez_)]

The earliest mark upon the Buen Retiro porcelain was a blue

fleur-de-lis, to which were subsequently added the letter M and a royal

crown. Still later, in the reign of Charles the Fourth, the mark used

was a fleur-de-lis with two crossed C's.

The object of the Buen Retiro Factory was almost wholly to supply the

Crown with costly ware, and would-be visitors were jealously excluded.

Townsend wrote in 1786: "I tried to obtain admission to the china

manufacture, which is likewise administered on the king's account, but

his Majesty's injunctions are so severe, that I could neither get

introduced to see it, nor meet with anyone who had ever been able to

procure that favour for himself. I was the less mortified upon this

occasion, because from the specimens which I have seen, both in the

palace at Madrid and in the provinces, it resembles the manufacture of

Sèvres, which I had formerly visited in a tour through France."

Laborde also complained that the factory was "wholly inaccessible: all

entrance to it is interdicted, and its existence is only ascertained by

the exhibition which is made of its productions in the royal palace."

The same writer refers to another class of work which was produced here,

namely, stone mosaic. "The process by which stone is wrought into

pictures is as delicate as it is curious: a selection is made from

marble fragments of various shades and dimensions, which are found, by

judicious assimilation, to produce no bad resemblance to painting." Jean

François de Bourgoing, French Minister at Madrid, was lucky enough, in

1782, to penetrate into the factory and view the process. "Le Monarque

actuel," he wrote, "a établi dans leur intérieur une fabrique de

porcelaine, dont l'entrée est jusqu'à présent interdite à tout le monde.

On veut sans doute que ses essais se perfectionnent dans le silence,

avant de les exposer aux regards des curieux. Ses productions ne peuvent

encore se voir que dans les Palais du Souverain, ou dans quelques Cours

d'Italie, auxquelles il les envoie en présens. On travaille dans le même

édifice à certains ouvrages de marqueterie, qui sont encore peu connus

en Europe. J'y pénétrai un jour, sous les auspices d'un étranger

distingué en faveur duquel le Roi avoit levé la prohibition rigoureuse,

qui en exclut tout le monde. Je suis témoin de la patience and de

l'adresse avec lesquelles on taille and on rapproche divers petits

morceaux de marbre coloré, pour en former des tableaux assez compliqués,

qui en faisant à-peu-près le même effet que la peinture, ont sur elle

l'avantage de braver par leur couleur immortelles les ravages du temps,

qui n'épargnent pas les plus belles productions de cet art."[102]

[102] _Nouveau Voyage en Espagne_; Vol. I., pp. 232, 233.

This factory was not long-lived. Until 1803 it followed the styles of

the older establishment at Capo-di-Monte, uniting neo-classic motives

with the manner of Baroque. In that year it began to produce porcelain

imitating that of Sèvres, and two Frenchmen, Vivien and Victor Perche,

were brought from Paris to superintend this change. "Among the finest

specimens of this period," says Riaño, "are a splendid clock and four

vases, two mètres high, with porcelain flowers, which exist in one of

the state rooms of the Palace of Madrid. The vases are placed in the

four corners of the room. The clock is ornamented with large biscuit

figures. A large number of vases of Retiro china exist at the royal

palaces of Madrid, Aranjuez, and the Escorial. They are often finely

mounted in gilt bronze with muslin or porcelain flowers. The blue of the

imitations of Wedgwood is not so pure, nor is the biscuit work so fine

as the English. Gold is often added to these specimens."

[Illustration: LXXIII

PORCELAIN OF THE MONCLOA FACTORY]

Nevertheless, this manufacture was by now decadent. It had suffered

severely from the death of Charles the Third, and upon the French

invasion in 1808 was seized by the enemy and occupied by them for

several months. During the reign of the "_intruso_," Joseph Buonaparte,

porcelain was still produced to some extent; but by the time of the

Peninsular campaign the works had practically ceased. "Near this

quarter," wrote Ford, describing the Retiro gardens, towards the middle

of last century, "was _La China_, or the royal porcelain manufactory,

that was destroyed by the invaders, and made by them into a

fortification, which surrendered, with two hundred cannon, August 14th,

1812, to the Duke. It was blown up October 30th, by Lord Hill, when the

misconduct of Ballesteros compelled him to evacuate Madrid. Now _La

China_ is one of the standing Spanish and _afrancesado_ calumnies

against us, as it is stated that we, the English, destroyed this

manufactory from commercial jealousy, because it was a rival to our

potteries. 'What can be done (as the Duke said) with such libels but

despise them. There is no end of the calumnies against me and the army,

and I should have no time to do anything else if I were to begin either

to refute or even to notice them?' (Disp., Oct. 16, 1813.) These china

potsherds and similar inventions of the enemy shivered against his iron

power of conscious superiority.

"The real plain _truth_ is this. The French broke the _ollas_, and

converted this Sèvres of Madrid into a Bastile, which, and not the

pipkins, was destroyed by the English, who now, so far from dreading any

Spanish competition, have actually introduced their system of pottery;

and accordingly very fair china is now made at Madrid and Seville, and

by English workmen. At the latter place a convent, also converted by

Soult into a citadel, is now made a hardware manufactory by our

countryman, Mr Pickman. Ferdinand the Seventh, on his restoration,

re-created _La China_, removing the workshops and warerooms to La

Moncloa, once a villa of the Alva family on the Manzanares."

This factory of La Moncloa was founded in 1816, and it continued working

until 1849. A specimen of the Moncloa ware is reproduced in Plate

lxxiii.

Outside the royal palaces of Spain, the Buen Retiro porcelain is scarce.

The choicest collections which are not the property of the Crown belong,

or have belonged till recently, to the Marquis of Arcicollar, the Count

of Valencia de Don Juan, and Don Francisco Laiglesia.

[Illustration]

GLASS

Small vessels of uncoloured glass, belonging to the Celtic

period, have been discovered in Galicia; so that the origin of this

industry in Spain is possibly pre-Roman. After the conquest glass was

made here by the Romans,[103] who built their ovens with a celebrated

argil (potter's earth) extracted from the neighbourhood of Valencia or

Tortosa. The Roman glass was doubtless imitated by the native Spaniards:

at least we know from observations by Saint Isidore that this substance

was quite familiar to the Visigoths. "Olim fiebat et in Italia, et per

Gallias, et Hispaniam arena alba mollissima pila mola qua terebatur."

The same author speaks with admiration of coloured glass-work imitating

precious stones. "Tingitur etiam multis modis, ita ut hyacinthos,

saphirosque et virides imitetur et oniches vel aliarum gemmarum

colores"; and again; "Fingunt enim eas ex diverso genere nigro, candido,

minioque colore. Nam pro lapide pretiosissimo smaragdo quidam vitrum

arte inficiunt, et fallit oculos sub dolo quadam falsa irriditas

quoadusque non est qui probet simulatum et arguat: sic et alia alio

atque alio modo. Neque enim est sine fraude ulla vita mortalium." We

gather from these statements that coloured glass in imitation of the

genuine precious stone was freely manufactured by the Visigoths. Such

imitations, justifying by their excellence Saint Isidore's assertion

that "vera a falsis discernere magna difficultas est," may still be seen

upon the crowns and other ornaments discovered at Guarrazar (see Vol.

I., pp. 15-29), as well as upon triptyches and weapons. Indeed, a taste

for imitation jewels forms an inherent trait of Spanish character, and

is discoverable at all moments of the national history. Travellers have

constantly observed it, and the remarks, already quoted, of Countess

d'Aulnoy, are confirmed by other authors. "In the broken banks south of

the river," wrote Swinburne of the Manzanares at Madrid, "are found

large quantities of pebbles, called Diamonds of Saint Isidro. They cut

them like precious stones, and ladies of the first fashion wear them in

their hair as pins, or on their fingers as rings. They have little or no

lustre, and a very dead glassy water. The value of the best rough stone

does not exceed a few pence."

[103] "Jam vero et per Gallias Hispaniasque simili modo harenæ

temperantur."--Pliny, Bk. xxxvi; Chap. 66.

The chief centres of glass-making were Tarragona, several towns of

Betica (Andalusia), and the Balearic Islands.

It is chiefly in the form of imitation gems that specimens of the

earliest Spanish glass have been preserved until our time,[104] although

the characteristic of old Roman glass which is known in Italian as the

_lattocinio_ or "milk-white" ornament, in the form of a thread or line

carried all over the surface of a vessel, remains until this day a

common feature of the glass of Spain, besides being found in

Spanish-Moorish glass-work.

[104] The distinction which Riaño attempts to draw between glass and

glass paste is unsatisfactory. He remarks, too, that the

manufacture of glass _may_ have existed in Spain at an earlier

period than the last three centuries, but continues: "The earliest

mention of glass-works in Spain will be found in Pliny, who, while

explaining the proceedings which were employed in this industry,

says that glass was made in a similar manner in France and Spain."

Rico y Sinobas says that the rules for cutting glass by means of a

diamond or _naife_ (as it was once called) are embodied in a treatise

titled _El Lapidario_, originally written (perhaps in the fourth, fifth,

or sixth century) in Hebrew, and which was brought to Spain some two or

three hundred years later. This treatise was translated into Arabic by

one Abolais, who lived at some time previous to the thirteenth century,

and subsequently (in the year 1248, and by command of Alfonso the

Learned) into the Castilian language.

Mixed up with a great deal of fabulous and fantastic matter, this

treatise contains instructive and interesting notices of the composition

and the colouring of old glass, including that of Spain. One of such

notices is the following. "Of the eleventh degree of the sign of

Sagittarius is the glass stone, containing a substance which is a body

in itself (sand), and another which is added to it (salt), and when they

clean these substances and draw them from the fire, they make between

the two a single body. The stone thus made (glass) has many colours.

Sometimes it is white (and this is nobler and better than the others),

or sometimes it is red, or green, or _xade_ (a dark, burnt colour), or

purple. It is a stone which readily melteth in the fire, but which, when

drawn therefrom, turneth again to its former substance: and if it be

drawn from the flame unseasonably, and without cooling it little by

little, it snappeth asunder. And it receiveth readily whatever colour

be placed upon it. And if an animal be hurt therewith, it openeth as

keen a wound as though it were of iron."

The treatise also describes a stone called _ecce_, which was used in

glassmaking, saying that it was found in Spain, "in a mountain, not of

great height, which overlooks the town of Arraca, and is called

Secludes. And the stone is of an intense black colour, spotted with

yellow drops. It is shiny and porous, brittle, and of light weight ...

and if it be ground up with honey, and the glass be smeared with it and

submitted to the fire, it dyes the glass of a beautiful gold colour, and

makes it stronger than it was before, so that it does not melt so

readily, or snap asunder with such ease."

I have said that the power of a diamond to cut glass is referred to in

the same work, which further tells us that this gem "breaketh all other

kind of stones, boring holes in them or cutting them, and no other stone

is able to bruise it; nay more, it powdereth all other stones if it be

rubbed upon them ... and such as seek to cut or perforate those other

stones take portions of a diamond, small and slender and sharp-pointed,

and mount them on slips of silver or of copper, and with them make the

holes or cuttings they require. Thus do they grave and carve intaglios."

All these branches of glassmaking were therefore practised by the

Spaniards from an early period of their history. This people were also

familiar with the use of emery powder, of talc applied to covering

windows, and of rock crystal. We read in the translation of Abolais that

crystal at that time was "found in many parts, albeit the finest is that

of Ethiopia. The substance which composes it is frozen water, petrified.

And the proof of this is that when it is broken, small grains are

discovered to be within, that made their entry as it was becoming stone

(crystallizing); or again, in some of it is found what seems to be clear

water. And it possesses two qualities in which it is distinct from every

other stone: for when crystal is heated it receiveth any colouring that

is applied to it, and is wrought with greater ease, besides being melted

by fire; insomuch that it can be made into any shape desired; and if

this shape be round, and the stone be set in the sun, it burneth

anything inflammable that be set before it: yet does it not effect this

by any virtue of its own, but by _the clearness of its substance_, and

by the sunbeams which beat upon it, and by the roundness of its form."

We seem to foreshadow here, clearly enough, the application of this

substance to making glasses to assist the sight, especially when the

author of the treatise adds that on looking through the crystal, the

human eye discovers "details of the greatest beauty, and things that are

secreted from the simple (_i.e._ the unaided) vision."

Rico y Sinobas (who possessed a fine collection of antique glass,

Spanish and non-Spanish) inclined to think that in the time of the

Romans the finest and strongest glass, as well as the costliest and the

most sought after, was that which was manufactured in Spain. In early

times the chief centres of Spanish glass-making were situated in the

heart of the Peninsula (where now is New Castile), in the neighbourhood

of Tortosa, and in certain districts lying between the Pyrenees and the

coast of Cataluña, though subsequently the practice of this craft

extended through the kingdoms of Valencia and Murcia, and the valleys of

Ollería, Salinas, Busot, and the Rio Almanzora, forming a zone which

reached from Cape Creus to Cape Gata. Other regions in which the craft

was introduced, apparently at a later epoch, were those of the

Mediterranean littoral, Cuenca, Toledo, Avila, Segovia, and other parts

of New Castile, as far as the slopes of the Sierra de Guadarrama. In the

rest of the Peninsula there is not the slightest indication (excepting

an obscure reference by Strabo, to vessels and receptacles of _wax_)

that glass was made during the Roman domination of the country, either

in Andalusia, Lusitania (Portugal), or in the northern regions of

Cantabria.

Rico y Sinobas has described a Spanish glass-oven of those primitive

times. He says that such as were used for making objects of a fair size

consisted of three compartments resting one upon the other; the lowest

cylindrical, to hold the fire and ashes, the next with a domed top, for

concentrating the heat, and the third and uppermost, which also had a

domed top, for holding the pieces of glass that were set to cool by slow

degrees. The wall of the oven contained a number of openings, which

served, according to the level at which they were situated, for

controlling the fire, adjusting the crucibles, or extracting, by means

of metal rods, the lumps of molten glass, previously to submitting them

to the action of the blowpipe. The dimensions of such of these

primitive ovens as have been found in Spain or Italy, are nine feet in

height by six feet in diameter, and the material of which they are built

is argil, of a kind insensible to heat, and carefully freed by washing

from all foreign, soluble, or inflammable substances. The crucibles,

which were fitted in the oven two, four, or at most six at a time, were

of this argil also, wrought and purified with even greater care. Ovens

and crucibles of a smaller size were used for making diminutive objects

such as beads and imitation precious stones.[105]

[105] Rico y Sinobas, _Del Vidrio y de sus artifices en España

(Almanaque del Museo de la Industria_, 1870).

The Arts and Crafts of Older Spain, Volume 2 (of 3) · 第 11 / 13 段