Dachau 3K, 28 April 1943

To the Commander of the Sachsenhausen Concentration Camp,

SS Obersturmbannfuehrer Keindl

Sachsenhausen, near Oranienburg

Obersturmbannfuehrer!

By order of the Reich Leader SS, I have been conducting freezing

experiments on human beings in the Dachau concentration camp for more

than a year. Today I learned from an experimental subject that I was not

the only one conducting these experiments, but that, on the contrary,

already in October and November 1938, similar experiments were conducted

in the Sachsenhausen concentration camp. SS Hauptsturmfuehrer Dr.

Samenstrang is said to have frozen experimental subjects—that is

prisoners—in cold water, and subsequently revived them by means of warm

water or hot compresses. As I was to work out and have worked out a

prescription for the Waffen SS for the resuscitation of frozen persons

(for the campaign in the East), knowledge of all preliminary experiments

in my field of work is of great importance for me.

I therefore request that if possible you let me know what kind of

experiments were conducted in your camp, and, if possible, what results

were obtained in connection with these experiments.

As you might not know anything about me, please make inquiries about me,

if necessary, either at the Personal Staff of the Reich Leader SS

(Obersturmbannfuehrer Baumert) or from the Commander of the Dachau

concentration camp, SS Sturmbannfuehrer Weiss.

Yours sincerely

Heil Hitler!

TRANSLATION OF DOCUMENT NO-231

PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 116

LETTER FROM RASCHER TO SIEVERS, 17 MAY 1943, CONCERNING,

A CONFERENCE WITH GEBHARDT ON FREEZING EXPERIMENTS

Copy

By Messenger!

Dr. med. Rascher, SS Hauptsturmfuehrer

Dachau 3K, 17 May 1943

To: Reich Business Manager of the Ahnenerbe Society

Attn: SS Standartenfuehrer Sievers

Berlin-Dahlem, 16 Pueckler Street

Dear Standartenfuehrer!

The following contains a short account of my report to SS Gruppenfuehrer

Dr. Gebhardt.

On 14 May 1943, I reported to SS Gruppenfuehrer Prof. Dr. Gebhardt at

Hohenlychen. I had hardly arrived, when SS Gruppenfuehrer Dr. Gebhardt

asked me in a very loud voice to explain how I dared to submit

specialist medical reports directly to the Reich Leader SS (he was

referring to the treatise on “The Cooling of Human Beings Outdoors”). I

actually did not even get a chance to speak and practically couldn’t

reply anything. Then, when I tried to reply, Prof. Dr. Gebhardt said

that if I wanted to defy him, my train would be leaving for Berlin at 3

o’clock. When I was finally given the opportunity to speak I was able to

point out to Prof. Dr. Gebhardt that the report in question was not

meant to be a strictly scientific work, but simply was a short

information for the Reich Leader SS on the results of the experiments

conducted up to now. Dr. Gebhardt had taken the view that the report was

unscientific, and if a student of the second term dared to submit a

treatise of that kind, he would throw him out. Later on I was able to

tell him that of course all the physiological-chemical experiments that

could be carried out in Dachau with the available instruments had indeed

been conducted. Whereupon Dr. Gebhardt replied: “I can imagine that you

did a lot of work; one can tell it from this job. If I had not believed

that you did a lot of work, I would not have asked you to come at all.”

In addition Dr. Gebhardt said that he intended to merge all the groups

of physicians working independently within the SS, since that would suit

the Reich Leader SS much better than individual people working on their

own. Besides that, he said that I somehow ought to learn university

methods of working since very likely I did not yet have the proper

training. He suggested that it was necessary for me to get out of Dachau

since there I was quite left to myself and had no guidance whatsoever;

that since I intended to enter upon a university career, I would by all

means have to complete the training of a university assistant first. He

further said that all those SS physicians, who are qualified to enter

upon a university career, had the duty to do so. Upon my reply that for

that reason I was already in touch with Professor Pfannenstiel,

Professor Gebhardt replied that these matters ought to be processed by a

centralized agency. In future it would not do that I send any reports

directly to the Reich Leader SS, but that further reports to serve their

purpose would have to be transmitted through him to the Reich Leader. If

the report had reached a suitable stage, he would first inform the Reich

Leader SS, and then go to see the Reich Leader SS together with me.

Finally Dr. Gebhardt asked me to give him data on my personal and

scientific career to enable him to make further arrangements. He

requested me to call again in the afternoon.

When I called in the afternoon, I was, as in the morning, accompanied by

SS Hauptsturmfuehrer Dr. Fischer. This time Dr. Gebhardt was extremely

amiable. He asked me whether I now agreed with his arrangements; it

would be by far the best I could do, if I joined him. I should not

worry, but just continue my work in Dachau, until I had finished my

jobs. Later, one would see what was to be done for the future. Upon my

question, what it was all about, and who was my superior, whether the

Reichsarzt SS, SS Gruppenfuehrer Dr. Grawitz, who had come for an

inspection several days ago, the Reich Leader SS, as he personally had

promised me, or the Ahnenerbe, of which I had been a member for years,

Dr. Gebhardt suggested that all that will be straightened out. Just

trust it to me. But I’ll need your curriculum vitae soon, since I have

to report to the Reich Leader SS on 23 May.

May I ask you, Standartenfuehrer, under whom I am actually working?

Under the Reich Leader SS, the Ahnenerbe, the Reich Physician SS or Dr.

Gebhardt? Dr. Gebhardt has already asked me why I am not a member of the

Waffen SS. Upon my answer that Dr. Hippke does not like to let me go, he

declared that I was too able for him to let me go. Standartenfuehrer! If

the same tug of war starts in the Waffen SS as has been going on between

Luftwaffe and the SS, I’d rather do without a transfer to the Waffen SS.

I was promised that I would continue to work under the Reich Leader SS

or under the Ahnenerbe. But I cannot serve several masters at the same

time. Of course I am convinced that SS Gruppenfuehrer Prof. Dr. Gebhardt

has the best of intentions. His assistants are enthusiastic about him.

If I am compelled to ask Prof. Dr. Gebhardt’s advice each time I am

going to start a new experiment, I will get so much involved in the

academic routine that I won’t even be allowed to experiment with such a

method as rapid resuscitation which overthrows all the established

clinical experiences because the results contradict Prof. Dr. Gebhardt’s

methods which are based upon centuries-old clinical experiences. Also

the cooperation with Professor von Luetzelberg would thus come to an

end, as these experiments are from the very start contradictory to the

hitherto recognized clinical experiences. I think, this arrangement

would stop everything that really ought to be experimented.

I pray you with all my heart, Standartenfuehrer, to handle this affair

in such a way that Prof. Dr. Gebhardt, who is a very close friend of the

Reich Leader SS does not become my enemy. I think that Prof. Dr.

Gebhardt can and will be an extremely disagreeable adversary. Before I

get into trouble with him, I would rather resign my job and ask for an

immediate transfer to the Luftwaffe for combat service. I therefore ask

you again to deal with this affair with as much circumspection as it

actually requires, because in addition I am convinced that Prof. Dr.

Gebhardt (apart from his personal ambition) really has good intentions.

* * * * *

Very respectfully yours and

Heil Hitler!

Yours very devotedly

[Signature] S. RASCHER

This is to certify that the above copy is true:

[Signature] SIEVERS

SS Standartenfuehrer.

TRANSLATION OF DOCUMENT NO-432

PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 119

LETTER FROM RASCHER TO NEFF, 21 OCTOBER 1943, CONCERNING

DRY-FREEZING EXPERIMENTS

Dr. S. Rascher

Dachau, 21 October 1943

To

Police-Rottwachtmeister Walter Neff

Police Training Battalion I

Dresden-Hellerau

Dear Neff:

Your letter dated 11.10 reached me here on 15.10. First of all many

thanks for your decision to write such a detailed letter. I really was

very pleased about it. To come right away to the affair concerned: I am

very sorry to hear that you are being bullied, especially as there

exists no reason at all for it. Please let me know the name, rank, and

address of your commanding officer because I most certainly will take

the matter up. There is no purpose at all in your getting stuck there.

Finally I too know how the general condition of your health had been,

when you were still here, and I also am able to judge that you cannot go

through heavy infantry training. I am glad that you have become

accustomed to the ideals of the place and I am convinced that you would

be glad to go to the front. But on the other hand, I believe that I need

you more urgently than you are needed at the front. As a matter of fact

I need you for the following: _From the Reich Research Council_

[Reichsforschungsrat] I got the order to carry out open country freezing

experiments and I think they will take place on the Sudelfeld. Now I

need urgently a most reliable man, acquainted with the material, and

that is you in this case. During the next few days I will go with

Sievers to the Fuehrer’s Headquarters [Fuehrerhauptquartier], and report

there in this sense, and will let you know immediately.

* * * * *

I expect your notice soon, and remain until then with sincerest

comradely regards,

Your old chief,

[Initialed] R.

TRANSLATION OF DOCUMENT NO-690

PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 120

LIST OF RESEARCH PROJECTS FROM THE FILES OF THE

REICH RESEARCH COUNCIL

Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I · 第 204 / 486 题