In October, 1847, the _Review_ stated the policy which it said Polk

should have adopted: to issue a statement that we would defend Texas,

that Mexico must pay the claims of our citizens, and that we desired

no Mexican territory; next, to take a defensive position in Texas,

perhaps occupy a Pacific port as security for our claims, and then

await developments. [As a military programme this plan of standing on

the defensive was seriously considered by the government and, as we

shall see, was condemned for both political and military reasons. To

say we desired no Mexican territory would have been meaningless unless

we pledged ourselves to take none, and to issue such a promise on the

eve of a war the course of which could not be predicted, and especially

in view of the fact that Mexico could pay no large indemnity except

with territory, would certainly have been imprudent, and the _Review's_

proposition to seize a port as security for our claims suggests as much.

This proposition, by the way, was less justifiable than going to the Rio

Grande, for we had a claim to the intermediate territory and no claim to

a Mexican port. To take a defensive attitude in Texas signified either

going to the Rio Grande in order to obtain a good strategic position,

or maintaining at great expense for an indefinite period an army large

enough to guarantee the Texans against attack at any and every point.

The first of these plans was the one adopted by Polk; the second, on

account of the expense, would have been unjust to our own people, and in

the end would have compelled us to increase our demands for indemnity

against Mexico. Moreover, there were strong objections to waiting

(p. 136); and, had Mexico simply adhered to the policy of passive

resistance, all our trouble and expense would have brought us no nearer

a settlement. Still other objections to the plan of the _Review_ could

be offered.

VIII. PALO ALTO, RESACA DE LA PALMA

8.1. The account of the Mexican army is based upon Memorias de ...

Guerra, 1844; Mar., 1845; Dec., 1846; =152=Claiborne, Mems.; _Diario_,

May 30, 1845; Balbontín, Estado Militar; Paz, Invasión; =5=Anaya,

Memoria; Peña, Comunicación circular; _Siglo XIX_, Aug. 19, 21, 1845;

S. Miguel, Repúb. Mex., 133-4, 136; Wash. _Globe_, Oct. 15, 1845;

Molina, recolls.; _Hist. Mag._, Feb., 1870 (Deas); Zirckel, Tagebuch,

13, 111; Semmes, Service, 441, note; =75=Memorias drawn up by war

dept. chiefs, Nov., 1847; =81=_Seminario Polít. del Gob. de N. León_;

Moore, Scott's Camp., 19; =76=Report of superior engineer board, Nov.

15, 1845; Balbontín, Invasión, 77-8; _Monitor Repub._, Nov. 30, 1847;

=148=Chamberlain, recolls.; =69=report of spy, Apr. 5, 1846; N. Orl.

_Commerc. Bulletin_, May 21, 1846; =76=Carrera, report on artillery,

Dec, 1847; =76=reports of the powder mills at Zacatecas and Santa Fé.

Dec., 1843, a special school of application for artillery and engineer

officers was decreed, but lack of money prevented its establishment.

There was a normal school, intended to convey the rudiments of military

knowledge to the privates through the corporals and sergeants, but it

signified little or nothing. Attached to the engineer corps was a body

of sappers, miners, and pontoniers; but, owing to lack of funds to equip

it with, it served as infantry. The poorest cannon, especially at first,

were kept at the fortresses. What horses could be had for artillery

service were too light and frisky. Paredes reorganized this arm, and

assigned to it about 250 officers, 5000 privates, and 200 clerks and

workmen. The bronze cannon manufactured in Mexico during 1846-47 were

not satisfactory, and the grape-shot was so poorly made that its range

was considerably reduced. The importance of artillery had never been

appreciated in that country. There was a good arsenal at Mexico, and

there were old-fashioned powder-mills at Santa Fe (near that city) and

Zacatecas. The latter blew up early in 1845, and, though repaired,

worked at a disadvantage. Mexican powder was usually of an inferior

quality. The Active corps contained fewer men than the Permanent. The

infantry musket carried an ounce ball; and the escopeta bullet was even

heavier and went farther. In both cases the very liberal charge of

powder increased the normal range. Many of the escopetas were merely

sawed-off muskets. The shaft of the lance was usually about six feet

long and the head about one foot. The Line infantry included light

companies (_cazadores_), which sometimes had rifles and sometimes

deserved to be called sharpshooters. There were mounted cazadores also.

Each cavalry regiment consisted of four squadrons, and each infantry

regiment included two battalions, one commanded by the lieutenant

colonel, and the other by the major (_comandante de batallón_). There

were mounted corps called hussars, etc., but the difference of name

signified little or nothing, practically. Owing to the smallness of the

horses, the cavalry had not much shock-value. There were 635 cannon on

hand at the end of 1845, 25,789 muskets, 8155 swords, 100,000 artillery

projectiles, and more than 400,000 bullets. Tornel imported 104 new

cannon early in 1846. Differences of caliber interfered greatly with the

usefulness of the muskets. March 9, 1846, the departments were urged to

complete their legal quotas of troops as soon as possible.

8.2. On the first day when volunteers were to enlist only eleven came

forward at Mexico.

8.3. The figures are based upon the =76=official return of April 17

supplemented by a large number of Mexican and American statements.

Most of the latter were exaggerated. The Americans were doubtless

misled often by the statements of prisoners, who wished to please

their captors. "The information obtained from prisoners ought to be

estimated at its proper value" (Napoleon, Maxims, 53). Mejía, the

regular commander of the first brigade, gave way temporarily to García

on account of ill health.

8.4. =69=Reports of spies. _República de Rio Grande_, June 27.

=118=Berlandier, memo., undated. =66=Mansfield to Totten, May 4.

=217=Henshaw papers. =76=Testimony at the trial of Arista. =76=Mejía,

Feb. 28; Mar. 18. =76=Commander of zapadores, Apr. 8. Henry, Camp.

Sketches, 68, 70. México á través, iv, 561. Campaña contra, 4.

8.5. _Monitor Repub._, Mar. 17. Negrete, Invasión, ii, 113, 117. _Revue

des Deux Mondes_, Aug. 1, 1847, 388-93. =13=Elliot, nos. 12, 14, etc.,

1846. =66=Mansfield to Totten, Apr. 2, 23. =61=Worth to Taylor, Apr. 2.

=61=Scott to Marcy, May 7. =65=Taylor, gen. orders 42. =65=Marcy, gen.

orders 5. Sen. 230; 29, 1. =224=Hitchcock, diary. =62=Twiggs to Davis,

May 4. The principal causes of the absenteeism were assignment to higher

duties elsewhere and the impossibility (owing to the lack of a retired

list) of replacing invalided or superannuated officers. _Locomotor_,

Mar. 27. Campaña contra, 4. Henry, Camp. Sketches, 129-30. Upton, Mil.

Policy. 206. =285=Mejía to Paredes, Apr. 3. =76=Comte. of Zapadores,

Apr. 8. =76=Mejía, Mar. 14, 28; Apr. 2. =76=_Id._ to Arista, Apr. 30.

=76=Ampudia to Arista, Apr. 30.

8.6. =66=Sanders to Totten, Apr. 10 (Ft. B. badly placed). =185=_Id._ to

Duncan, Apr. 27. =69=Requena to Arista, Apr. 30 (might have enfiladed).

Hitchcock, Fifty Years, 217. _República de Rio Grande_, June 27.

_Picayune_, May 10. =118=Berlandier, memo. (Groves) Ampudia, Address

(1846). =52=Wickliffe to Buchanan, May 21, 1845. Giddings, Camp., 36.

_Niles_, May 16, p. 165; 23, p. 179. Kenly, Md. Vol., 42. Polk, Diary,

Apr. 1, 1847. =218=Henshaw narrative. Apuntes, 35. =66=Sanders to

Taylor, May 2. Wash. _Union_, May 9; June 6. Meade, Letters, i, 59-60.

_Journal U. S. Artill._, July, 1892, p. 293. =132=King to Buchanan, June

1. =69=Spy to Taylor, Apr. 11.

Taylor's army lay on the Pt. Isabel road, which connected here with the

principal Matamoros ferry (_Paso Real_). Fort Brown was about a mile and

a half from the site of the present fort. The line of the fort at Pt.

Isabel enclosed about fifty acres, and could not be properly fortified

with the means at hand in the time allowed. May 2 the works were far

from complete. Some at least of the disadvantages of his position were

pointed out to Taylor, but he seemed to feel no concern. Marcy was

surprised that the Mexicans did not cross the Rio Grande near its mouth

and capture Pt. Isabel. The explanation probably was that they believed

the plan they acted upon was better.

8.7. =217=Henshaw papers. =61=Crossman to ... Apr. 23. =66=Mansfield to

Totten, Apr. 23. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 133, 138, 142, 288 (Taylor). _Spirit

of the Times_, May 23. Meade, Letters, i, 66 (the murder of Cross caused

intense resentment). México á través, iv, 561. Campaña contra, 4.

=69=Walker to Taylor, May 2. Walker was absent on service when the men

were surprised. =52=Consul Chase, Tampico, May 1. _National_, June 18.

8.8. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 133, 302 (Taylor). (West Pointers) =224=Bliss

to Hitchcock, June 7. =76=Mejía, Apr. 9. =76=_Id._ to Arista, Apr. 30.

=76=Ampudia, Mar. 28. _Tropic_, May 7 (proclam. of Ampudia). Ballentine,

Eng. Soldier, i, 57-9. Kenly, Md. Vol., 39, 40. (Promises, etc.)

=69=Arista, "Advice," Apr. 20. =69=Report of spy, Apr. 5. Wilhelm,

Eighth Inf., i, 408. Meade, Letters, i, 53. London _Times_, June 8. Ho.

194; 29, 1 (Jones, May 5). _Spirit of the Times_, May 16. _Esperanza_,

Apr. 18. Bustamante, N. Bernal, ii, 11. =69=Mier y Terán to Mejía, May

4. Taylor gave orders to shoot soldiers attempting to cross the river.

Later, British deserters were not accepted.

8.9. =76=Arista, May 1, 7. So. _Advocate_, June 10, 1846. =76=Ampudia

to Arista, Apr. 30. =76=Parrodi, Apr. 8. =69=Arista, "Advice," Apr.

20. =76=Mejía proclam., Mar. 18. (Lasted) Donnavan, Adventures, 102.

=76=Comte. gen. S. L. Potosí, proclam., Mar. 27. =76=Comte. gen.

Zacatecas to troops, Apr. 1. The Mexican press teemed with the ideas

here suggested. To an Indian anything as foreign as a neighboring

estate seemed dreadful. =76=Ampudia, Mar. 28. Apuntes, 33. (Despised)

=162=Conner to wife, May 9; Henshaw narrative; _Niles_, May 16, p. 165;

Sept. 12, p. 22. (Hardee) =224=Bliss to Hitchcock, June 7. Ampudia's

troops had mutinied on the way, but an appeal to their patriotism

had brought them round. There had been, as was usual, a good deal of

desertion; but to a certain extent those who stood by the colors were

for this reason above the average (=76=Ampudia, Mar. 10, 11, 12).

Taylor's method--uniformly despising the enemy and teaching his troops

to do so--was contrary to the practice of Cæsar, Napoleon and the Duke

of Wellington (Napol., Maxims, 49, note).

8.10. (Obvious) Henshaw narrative. =63=Marcy, Jan. 13. =69=Friend, [Apr.

11]. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 138, 140, 142 (Taylor). =65=Taylor, gen. orders

45. (Seven) =69=McCall, report, Apr. 30. May 3 Taylor reported that his

lack of light troops had helped to keep him in ignorance of the enemy's

movements as if that lack had been due to some one else. He did not call

on Texas for troops until Apr. 26. Ripley (War with Mexico, i, 133) says

he did not call in February because such troops could serve only three

months. But had a call been issued then, the troops would probably not

have begun to serve for a month or two; and later he could have called

for a second small body.

8.11. México á través, iv, 561. =76=Arista, Apr. 27; May 1. =76=_Id._

to Ampudia, May 5. _Revue des Deux Mondes_, Aug. 1, 1847, 394-6.

_Republicano_, June 5. Campaña contra. =76=Arista to Mejía, May 1, 2.

=76=Mejía to Arista, May 1, 3. =69=Diary captured in Arista's papers.

=76=Plana mayor diary. Apuntes, 35-7. Bustamante, N. Bernal, ii, 16.

=76=Testimony at trial of Arista. People in the United States could not

believe Taylor would permit the enemy to get between him and his base

(_e.g._ Mobile _Herald and Tribune_, May 3). At first Arista left only

1007 men at Matamoros, but, becoming anxious about the town, he sent

back the Morelia battalion.

8.12. Henshaw narrative. Mansfield, Mex. War, 35. Ho. 60; 30, 1, p. 288

(Taylor). Taylor, Letters (Bixby), 175. _Picayune_, May 12. Nebel and

Kendall, 1. _Niles_, May 23, p. 178. Ho. 1; 30, 2, p. 1161 (Conner).

=62=Twiggs to Davis, May 4. (Lowd, etc.) Meade, Letters, i, 74-5.

Appleton's Biog. Dict. (art. by J. Davis on Taylor). _Autograph_,

May-June, 1912 (Taylor). Smith, To Mexico, 44. Fry and Conrad, Taylor,

109-10. Henry, Camp. Sketches, 86. =76=Diary of plana mayor. =76=To

Arista, May 15.

Mejía notified Arista that Taylor was preparing to move, but the news

arrived so late that the guns of Matamoros did not open fire upon him.

Arista pursued the Americans but could not overtake them; and a body of

dragoons that he ordered on was equally unsuccessful. On the morning

of May 3 the boom of heavy guns in the direction of Fort Brown (Grant,

Mems., i, 92; Henry, Camp. Sketches, 88) alarmed Taylor, and he gave

orders to set out at one o'clock (Henry, Camp. Sketches, 88; Smith,

To Mexico, 44), which showed that he felt no great confidence in its

defensibility even then; but he desired to strengthen the base and to

receive some ordnance and reinforcements that he then expected (Ho.

60; 30, 1, p. 288), and hence sent Capt. Walker with a small party to

communicate with Brown (Henshaw narrative). This was a hard task; but

after some fighting, Walker reached the fort, stated that Taylor would

return as soon as possible, obtained a reassuring report (Ho. 60; 30, 1,

p. 293), and with great difficulty made his way back (Henshaw papers;

Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 289, 293). May 1 Pt. Isabel had a force, including

civilians who took up arms, of 400-500 (_Niles_, May 16, p. 165; 23, p.

179; _Picayune_, May 10; Wash. _Union_, May 9).

8.13. Meade, Letters, i, 74-8, 93. =65=Taylor, gen. orders 56, 58.

_Journ. Mil. Serv. Instit._, xli, 94. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 288, 292-4

(Taylor); 527 (spec. orders 60). _Autograph_, May-June, 1912 (Taylor).

Nebel and Kendall, 2. Grant, Mems., i, 167-8. Henry, Camp. Sketches,

88-9. (Leaving train, etc.) =224=Larnard to Hitchcock, June 13. Wash.

_Union_, May 9, 29, 30. _Niles_, May 16, p. 162. =62=Twiggs to Davis,

May 4. French, Two Wars, 49. Some of the officers were anxious to wait

for larger reinforcements (=185=L. C. to Duncan, Nov. 21), but Taylor

feared Fort Brown was getting short of ammunition.

8.14. _The battle of Palo Alto._ Sen. 388; 29, 1 (Taylor and officers).

=65=Taylor, gen. orders 58. _Id._, Letters (Bixby), 1. Campaña contra.

México á través, iv, 561-3, 566. =224=Bliss to Hitchcock, July 23.

=61=Arthur to brother, May 10. Meade, Letters, i, 79, 80. =13=Pakenham,

no. 54, 1846. McCall, Letters, 449-54. =224=Larnard to Hitchcock,

June 13. Eyewitness, Complete History, 23. =210=Alvord to Hammond,

May 22. Wash. _Union_, May 30. Map in Map Div., Lib. of Cong. _Nat.

Intelligencer_, May 11, 18; Sept. 3, 10. N. Y. _Journ. of Commerce_,

Feb. 24, 1847. _Diario_, May 29. _Tex. Democrat_, June 24. _Spirit of

the Times_, May 30. Portrait of Arista, city hall, Mex. =350=Weber,

recolls. =213=Hatch, letters. _Picayune_, Aug. 1, 1845; Sept. 24, 1846.

_Delta_, May 24. =118=Berlandier, diary and map. =185=Duncan to adj.

gen., June 19. =185=Marcy to Duncan, July 27. Nebel and Kendall, 2-3.

Smith, To Mexico, 45, 47-9. Fallo Definitivo del Supremo Tribunal [_re_

Arista's conduct]. Sedgwick, Corresp., i, 16. _Niles_, June 6, pp.

215-16; Oct. 24, p. 122. Frost, Taylor, 81. _Hist. Mag._, Feb., 1870,

101-2. Haskin, First Artill., 80. _Journ. Milit. Serv. Instit._, xli,

96. Ampudia ante ... la Opinión Pública. (Stepped aside) Grant, Mems.,

95. Sen. 378; 29, 1, p. 57. Sierra, Evolution, i, 214. _Esperanza_, May

23. _Monitor Repub._, June 2. _Autograph_, May-June, 1912 (Taylor).

Ampudia to Fellow-cits. =285=Arista to Paredes, May 14. =285=Segura

to Escudero, June 4. Ramsey, Other Side, 39, note, 48. (Losses) Ho.

24; 31, 1. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 295, 393 (Taylor); 392 (Marcy); 1102

(McIntosh); 403. =185=Duncan to Belknap, May 12. French, Two Wars, 49,

50. =364=Worth to S., June 13. Donnavan, Adventures, 102. Henry, Camp.

Sketches, 90-3, 95. Roa Bárcena, Recuerdos, 36, 39. Sumaria mandada

formar ... J. L. Uraga. Negrete, Invasión, ii, 233. Wilhelm, Eighth

Inf., i, 414-9. Apuntes, 38-41. _So. Qtrly. Rev_., Nov., 1850, p. 446.

And from =76= the following. Testimony at the court-martial of Arista.

To Arista, May 17. Arista, May 7, 8, 13, 1846; July 12, 1847. Ampudia,

May 14. Requena to Arista, May 8. Vázquez to sister, May 25. Arista to

Ampudia, May 5; to Parrodi, May 9. Ampudia to Arista, May 11. Plana

mayor diary.

REMARKS. When first seen, the Mexicans were probably two or

three miles from the Palo Alto pond, but they advanced until about a

mile and a half from that point. Both lines of battle were too long. The

batteries on both sides used solid shot mostly. On the placing of our

gunners in advance of the troops, see Napoleon, Maxims, 45. The Mexican

gunners fired mostly at the American artillery, but the American gunners

mostly at the Mexican infantry. It was said that not more than a dozen

Mexicans were killed with bullets. Many of the Americans were ordered to

sit down or lie down (particularly the Eighth Infantry); and as most of

the Mexican balls approached at a ricochet it was not very difficult to

dodge them. Whatever the Americans accomplished was almost wholly due to

their cannon. Not only the excellence of the ammunition and the accurate

fire, but the boldness and rapidity of the manoeuvres astonished the

Mexicans. It is not known why Taylor decided to rely on artillery, to

which (it was stated) he had referred contemptuously on the morning

of the battle as mere "gun wagons"; but presumably, as the field was

peculiarly well suited for that arm, Ringgold and Duncan, supported

by Bliss, urged him to let it have a chance. The American officers,

though they had not over-much confidence in Taylor, felt a great deal

in one another, and so had a vast advantage over the Mexicans (México

á través, iv, 566). Ringgold was mortally wounded, but would not let

his men leave their work to care for him. During the intermission the

Americans removed their wounded, replenished caissons, and made repairs.

Commodore Conner, hearing Taylor was likely to be attacked, sailed for

that quarter, and on May 8 and 9 landed 500 seamen and marines at Point

Isabel (=166=Conner Letter-book. See also =65=Taylor, gen. orders 60.).

The chief Mexican surgeon and a number of assistants made an early and

rapid retreat. The Mexican loss was estimated by Taylor as 200 killed

and 400 wounded; by Arista as 252 killed, wounded, and missing.

8.15. (May 8 indecisive) =224=Larnard to Hitchcock, June 13; Giffard to

Pakenham, May 28; McCall, Letters, 454; Meade, Letters, i, 80; Wilhelm,

Eighth Inf., i, 416-7. Sen. 388; 29, 1. Taylor, Letters (Bixby),

1. (Consulted) Wilhelm, Eighth Inf., i, 418; Stevens, Campaigns,

20; Sedgwick, Corresp., i, 16; _Journ. Milit. Serv. Instit._, xli,

98; =185=L. C. to Duncan, Nov. 24; Article by J. Davis on Taylor in

Appleton's Biog. Dict. Accounts of this conference differ so much that

little can be said of it. Some of the officers were for entrenching and

awaiting reinforcements. It was known that Conner's fleet had arrived

(note 14). (Defend) Taylor, _supra_; Henry, Camp. Sketches, 94; map

of P. Alto in Map Div., Lib. of Cong. Churchill's 18-pounders and two

12-pounders taken from the baggage were left here. The wounded were sent

to Pt. Isabel. Rives (U. S. and Mexico, ii, 153) states that Taylor

marched early May 9 to Resaca de la Palma and parked the train there,

but this is incorrect (Taylor in Sen. 388; 29, 1, p. 6; Henry, Camp.

Sketches, 94; =369=map of Palo Alto; Ripley, War with Mexico, i, 124;

etc.). The point is important because troops were left with the train to

protect the wagons--not as a rear guard (Rives). Rives (p. 154) states

incorrectly that the Eighth Infantry was left with the train.

8.16. _The battle of May 9._ Sen. 388; 29, 1 (Taylor and officers).

Apuntes, 42-7. Suárez y Navarro, Alegato. Campaña contra. Negrete,

Invasión, ii, 230, 233. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 295, 393, 396, 403 (Taylor);

392, 395 (Marcy); 1104 (McIntosh). =69=Canales to Arista, May 9.

=13=Giffard to Bankhead, May 13. Henshaw narrative. =147=Chamberlain,

diary. Taylor, Letters (Bixby), 1. =210=Alvord to Hammond, May 22.

=210=Hammond to Simms, Apr. 1, 1847. =213=Hatch, letters. Wash.

_Union_, July 25, 1846. =369=Map of P. Alto. _Spirit of the Times_,

May 30; June 20. _Picayune_, May 19; June 3. Berlandier, diary and

map. Nebel and Kendall, 3-4. México á través, iv, 564, 566. Fallo

Definitivo del Supremo Tribunal, 19. Sen. 4; 29, 2. Ho. 1; 30, 2, p.

1162. Claiborne, Quitman, i, 253. _Journ. Mil. Serv. Instit._, xvii

(Van Deusen); xli, 98. =370=Taylor to ----, June 18. Taylor, Letters

(Bixby), 175. Ampudia ante ... la Opin. Púb. (Uraga). McCall, Letters,

455. Sen. 378; 29, 1, p. 57 (Bliss). Grant, Mems., i, 93, 96-8. Meade,

Letters, i, 81-2, 149. =72=Reales Ordenes, Serie de Gobernación, leg.

43. Appleton's Biog. Dict. (art. by J. Davis on Taylor). (Losses) Ho.

24; 31, 1. =285=Arista to Paredes, May 9, 14. French, Two Wars, 51-4.

_Autograph_, May-June, 1912 (Taylor). =210=Bragg to Hammond, Dec. 20,

1847. Ampudia to Fellow-cits. =285=Segura to Escudero, June 4. Smith,

To Mexico, 49-52. =185=Duncan to Belknap, May 10. Eyewitness, Complete

Hist., 25-6. Wilhelm, Eighth Inf., i, 422-3. _Niles_, June 6, pp. 211-7;

July 4, p. 277; Sept. 26, p. 57. =224=Larnard to Hitchcock, June 13.

Henry, Camp. Sketches, 96-9. =61=Arthur to brother. _Puritano Mex._,

May 26. =224=Bliss to Hitchcock, June 7. =61=Patton to Polk, July 18,

and enclosure. México á través, iv, 564, 566. Roa Bárcena, Recuerdos,

48. The verse is by José de Saltillo, trans. by C. F. Hoffman. And from

=76= the following. Arista, May 9, 10, 13, 1846; July 12, 1847. _Id._ to

Mateos, May 31; to Parrodi, May 13; to Taylor, May 10. Carrera, May 25.

Requena to Arista, May 10. Testimony at the court-martial of Arista. R.

Vázquez to sister, May 25. Plana mayor diary. Ampudia to Arista, May 11,

14. Canales to Tornel, May 10.

REMARKS. It would be unsafe to give fuller information than that of

the text with reference to the positions of the Mexican corps. All

the accounts are unsatisfactory. Owing to the nature of the ground

and the irregular shifting of the troops, this was natural. The

Mexican leaders thought their position would ensure victory. Horses

were unsaddled and mules relieved of their packs. The chief danger to

Ridgely's battery was from Mexicans ambushed--as Taylor had reason

to suppose they would be--on both sides of the road. May, very tall

and straight, with long black hair and a black beard that reached to

his waist, became a newspaper hero, and for reasons that are rather

hard to understand, was promoted several times during the war; but he

seems clearly to have been essentially a cowardly sham. In this fight

he seized a cannon, but only the infantry prevented the enemy from

recapturing it. He claimed the credit of making Gen. Vega his prisoner,

but the real captor was a bugler. By his own account, he could rally

only six of his men after running through the batteries. The horses

appear to have "run away" with the men. Taylor's report laid stress

upon what occurred at the road, and he does not seem to have known--at

that time, to say the least--what mainly caused the sudden collapse of

the enemy; but an abundance of Mexican evidence, partly given under

oath, makes the matter clear. See also Henry, Camp. Sketches, 98. After

Americans were seen at the _placeta_ Arista's secretary went to where

the road crossed the resaca, and found May's dragoons there. This fixes

the order of events. Duncan's battery did nothing during the battle,

for Ridgely had the only opportunity to use artillery without injuring

Americans. Duncan and Kerr followed the Mexicans at some distance; the

Third Infantry coöperated; and so did the Artillery Battalion, after it

reached the scene; but the Mexicans were not aware of any real pursuit.

Fort Brown fired on the throngs of fugitives, but no sally was made.

One might imagine the garrison feared the guns of Matamoros; but they

watched the Mexican fugitives from the parapet. Mejía's ammunition had

been almost used up. Paredes informed Congress, June 6, that after May

9 Arista had 4000 regulars (Memoria de ... Relaciones, Dec., 1846).

May 13 Arista gave the number as 3758 "men." Arista's chief of staff

estimated the captured, drowned, and dispersed as 500. Arista informed

Parrodi, May 13, that the total number of men, including the wounded,

taken by Taylor was less than 200, and this seems to have been true.

May 11 prisoners were exchanged. Arista reported the number in American

hands as 144, including the wounded.

The War with Mexico, Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 47 / 63 段