A king sate on the rocky brow
Which looks o’er sea-born Salamis;
And ships, by thousands, lay below,
And men in nations;--all were his,
He counted them at break of day,
And when the sun set where were they?
--BYRON.
[Sidenote: [480 B.C.]]
The days of battle at Thermopylæ had been not less actively employed by
the fleets at Aphetæ and Artemisium. It has already been mentioned that
the Greek ships, having abandoned their station at the latter place and
retired to Chalcis, were induced to return, by the news that the Persian
fleet had been nearly ruined by the recent storm, and that, on returning
to Artemisium, the Grecian commanders felt renewed alarm on seeing the
enemy’s fleet, in spite of the damage just sustained, still mustering
in overwhelming number at the opposite station of Aphetæ. Such was the
effect of this spectacle, and the impression of their own inferiority,
that they again resolved to retire without fighting, leaving the strait
open and undefended. Great consternation was caused by the news of their
determination among the inhabitants of Eubœa, who entreated Eurybiades
to maintain his position for a few days, until they could have time to
remove their families and their property. But even such postponement was
thought unsafe, and refused: and he was on the point of giving orders for
retreat, when the Eubœans sent their envoy, Pelagon, to Themistocles,
with the offer of thirty talents, on condition that the fleet should
keep its station and hazard an engagement in defence of the island.
Themistocles employed the money adroitly and successfully, giving five
talents to Eurybiades, with large presents besides to the other leading
chiefs: the most unmanageable among them was the Corinthian Adimantus,
who at first threatened to depart with his own squadron alone, if the
remaining Greeks were mad enough to remain. His alarm was silenced, if
not tranquillised, by a present of three talents.
However Plutarch may be scandalised at such inglorious revelations
preserved to us by Herodotus respecting the underhand agencies of this
memorable struggle, there is no reason to call in question the bribery
here described. But Themistocles doubtless was only tempted to do,
and enabled to do, by means of the Eubœan money, that which he would
have wished and had probably tried to accomplish without the money--to
bring on a naval engagement at Artemisium. It was absolutely essential
to the maintenance of Thermopylæ, and to the general plan of defence,
that the Eubœan strait should be defended against the Persian fleet,
nor could the Greeks expect a more favourable position to fight in. We
may reasonably presume that Themistocles, distinguished not less by
daring than by sagacity, and the great originator of maritime energies
in his country, concurred unwillingly in the projected abandonment of
Artemisium: but his high mental capacity did not exclude that pecuniary
corruption which rendered the presents of the Eubœans both admissible and
welcome--yet still more welcome to him perhaps, as they supplied means
of bringing over the other opposing chiefs and the Spartan admiral. It
was finally determined, therefore, to remain, and if necessary, to hazard
an engagement in the Eubœan strait: but at any rate to procure for the
inhabitants of the island a short interval to remove their families.
Had these Eubœans heeded the oracles, says Herodotus, they would have
packed up and removed long before; for a text of Bacis gave them express
warning; but, having neglected the sacred writings as unworthy of credit,
they were now severely punished for such presumption.
Among the Persian fleet at Aphetæ, on the other hand, the feeling
prevalent was one of sanguine hope and confidence in their superior
numbers, forming a strong contrast with the discouragement of the Greeks
at Artemisium. Had they attacked the latter immediately, when both fleets
first saw each other from their opposite stations, they would have gained
an easy victory, for the Greek fleet would have fled, as the admiral
was on the point of ordering, even without an attack. But this was not
sufficient for the Persians, who wished to cut off every ship among their
enemies even from flight and escape. Accordingly, they detached two
hundred ships to circumnavigate the island of Eubœa, and to sail up the
Eubœan strait from the south, in the rear of the Greeks,--and postponing
their own attack in front until this squadron should be in position to
intercept the retreating Greeks. But though the manœuvre was concealed
by sending the squadron round outside of the island of Sciathus, it
became known immediately among the Greeks, through a deserter--Scyllias
of Scione. This man, the best swimmer and diver of his time, and now
engaged like other Thracian Greeks in the Persian service, passed over to
Artemisium, and communicated to the Greek commanders both the particulars
of the late destructive storm and the despatch of the intercepting
squadron.
BATTLE OF ARTEMISIUM
It appears that his communications, respecting the effects of the storm
and the condition of the Persian fleet, somewhat reassured the Greeks,
who resolved during the ensuing night to sail from their station at
Artemisium for the purpose of surprising the detached squadron of two
hundred ships, and who even became bold enough, under the inspirations of
Themistocles, to go out and offer battle to the main fleet near Aphetæ.
Wanting to acquire some practical experience, which neither leaders nor
soldiers as yet possessed, of the manner in which Phœnicians and others
in the Persian fleet handled and manœuvred their ships, they waited
till a late hour of the afternoon, when little daylight remained. Their
boldness in thus advancing out, with inferior numbers and even inferior
ships, astonished the Persian admirals, and distressed the Ionians and
other subject Greeks who were serving them as unwilling auxiliaries: to
both it seemed that the victory of the Persian fleet, which was speedily
brought forth to battle, and was numerous enough to encompass the Greeks,
would be certain as well as complete. The Greek ships were at first
marshalled in a circle, with the sterns in the interior, and presenting
their prows in front at all points of the circumference; in this
position, compressed into a narrow space, they seemed to be awaiting the
attack of the enemy, who formed a larger circle around them: but on a
second signal given, their ships assumed the aggressive, rowed out from
the inner circle in direct impact against the hostile ships around, and
took or disabled no less than thirty of them; in one of which Philaon,
brother of Gorgus, despot of Salamis in Cyprus, was made prisoner. Such
unexpected forwardness at first disconcerted the Persians, who however
rallied and inflicted considerable damage and loss on the Greeks: but the
near approach of night put an end to the combat, and each fleet retired
to its former station--the Persians to Aphetæ, the Greeks to Artemisium.
The result of this first day’s combat, though indecisive in itself,
surprised both parties and did much to exalt the confidence of the
Greeks. But the events of the ensuing night did yet more. Another
tremendous storm was sent by the gods to aid them. Though it was the
middle of summer,--a season when rain rarely falls in the climate of
Greece,--the most violent wind, rain, and thunder prevailed during the
whole night, blowing right on shore against the Persians at Aphetæ,
and thus but little troublesome to the Greeks on the opposite side of
the strait. The seamen of the Persian fleet, scarcely recovered from
the former storm at Sepias Acte, were almost driven to despair by this
repetition of the same peril: the more so when they found the prows
of their ships surrounded, and the play of their oars impeded, by the
dead bodies and the spars from the recent battle, which the current
drove towards their shore. If this storm was injurious to the main
fleet at Aphetæ, it proved the entire ruin of the squadron detached to
circumnavigate Eubœa, who, overtaken by it near the dangerous eastern
coast of that island, called the Hollows of Eubœa, were driven upon the
rocks and wrecked. The news of this second conspiracy of the elements, or
intervention of the gods, against the schemes of the invaders, was highly
encouraging to the Greeks; and the seasonable arrival of fifty-three
fresh Athenian ships, which reinforced them the next day, raised them to
a still higher pitch of confidence. In the afternoon of the same day,
they sailed out against the Persian fleet at Aphetæ, and attacked and
destroyed some Cilician ships even at their moorings; the fleet having
been too much damaged by the storm of the preceding night to come out and
fight.
But the Persian admirals were not of a temper to endure such
insults,--still less to let their master hear of them. About noon on
the ensuing day, they sailed with their entire fleet near to the Greek
station at Artemisium, and formed themselves into a half moon; while the
Greeks kept near to the shore, so that they could not be surrounded,
nor could the Persians bring their entire fleet into action; the ships
running foul of each other, and not finding space to attack. The battle
raged fiercely all day, and with great loss and damage on both sides: the
Egyptians bore off the palm of valour among the Persians, the Athenians
among the Greeks. Though the positive loss sustained by the Persians was
by far the greater, and though the Greeks, being near their own shore,
became masters of the dead bodies as well as of the disabled ships
and floating fragments, still, they were themselves hurt and crippled
in greater proportion with reference to their inferior total: and the
Athenian vessels especially, foremost in the preceding combat, found
one-half of their number out of condition to renew it. The Egyptians
alone had captured five Grecian ships with their entire crews.
Under these circumstances, the Greek leaders--and Themistocles, as it
seems, among them--determined that they could no longer venture to
hold the position of Artemisium, but must withdraw the naval force
farther into Greece: though this was in fact a surrender of the pass
of Thermopylæ, and though the removal which the Eubœans were hastening
was still unfinished. These unfortunate men were forced to be satisfied
with the promise of Themistocles to give them convoy for their boats and
their persons; abandoning their sheep and cattle for the consumption of
the fleet, as better than leaving them to become booty for the enemy.
While the Greeks were thus employed in organising their retreat, they
received news which rendered retreat doubly necessary. The Athenian
Abronychus, stationed with his ship near Thermopylæ, in order to keep
up communication between the army and fleet, brought the disastrous
intelligence that Xerxes was already master of the pass, and that the
division of Leonidas was either destroyed or in flight. Upon this the
fleet abandoned Artemisium forthwith, and sailed up the Eubœan strait;
the Corinthian ships in the van, the Athenians bringing up the rear.
Themistocles, conducting the latter, stayed long enough at the various
watering-stations and landing-places to inscribe on some neighbouring
stones invitations to the Ionian contingents serving under Xerxes:
whereby the latter were conjured not to serve against their fathers, but
to desert, if possible--or at least, to fight as little and as backwardly
as they could. Themistocles hoped by this stratagem perhaps to detach
some of the Ionians from the Persian side, or, at any rate, to render
them objects of mistrust, and thus to diminish their efficiency. With no
longer delay than was requisite for such inscriptions, he followed the
remaining fleet, which sailed round the coast of Attica, not stopping
until it reached the island of Salamis.
The news of the retreat of the Greek fleet was speedily conveyed by a
citizen of Histiæa to the Persians at Aphetæ, who at first disbelieved
it, and detained the messenger until they had sent to ascertain the fact.
On the next day, their fleet passed across to the north of Eubœa, and
became master of Histiæa and the neighbouring territory: from whence
many of them, by permission and even invitation of Xerxes, crossed over
to Thermopylæ to survey the field of battle and the dead. Respecting the
number of the dead, Xerxes is asserted to have deliberately imposed upon
the spectators: he buried all his own dead, except one thousand, whose
bodies were left out--while the total number of Greeks who had perished
at Thermopylæ, four thousand in number, were all left exposed, and in
one heap, so as to create an impression that their loss had been much
more severe than their own. Moreover, the bodies of the slain helots were
included in the heap, all of them passing for Spartans or Thespians in
the estimation of the spectators. We are not surprised to hear, however,
that this trick, gross and public as it must have been, really deceived
very few.
The sentiment, alike durable and unanimous, with which the Greeks of
after-times looked back on the battle of Thermopylæ, and which they have
communicated to all subsequent readers, was that of just admiration
for the courage and patriotism of Leonidas and his band. But among the
contemporary Greeks that sentiment, though doubtless sincerely felt,
was by no means predominant: it was overpowered by the more pressing
emotions of disappointment and terror. So confident were the Spartans
and Peloponnesians in the defensibility of Thermopylæ and Artemisium,
that when the news of the disaster reached them, not a single soldier
had yet been put in motion: the season of the festival games had passed,
but no active step had yet been taken. Meanwhile the invading force,
army, and fleet, was in its progress towards Attica and the Peloponnesus,
without the least preparations--and, what was still worse, without any
combined and concerted plan--for defending the heart of Greece. The loss
sustained by Xerxes at Thermopylæ, insignificant in proportion to his
vast total, was more than compensated by the fresh Grecian auxiliaries
which he now acquired. Not merely the Malians, Locrians, and Dorians,
but also the great mass of the Bœotians, with their chief town Thebes,
all except Thespiæ and Platæa, now joined him. Demaratus, his Spartan
companion, moved forward to Thebes to renew an ancient tie of hospitality
with the Theban oligarchical leader, Attaginus, while small garrisons
were sent by Alexander of Macedon to most of the Bœotian towns, as well
to protect them from plunder as to insure their fidelity. The Thespians,
on the other hand, abandoned their city, and fled into the Peloponnesus;
while the Platæans, who had been serving aboard the Athenian ships
at Artemisium, were disembarked at Chalcis as the fleet retreated,
for the purpose of marching by land to their city, and removing their
families. Nor was it only the land-force of Xerxes which had been thus
strengthened; his fleet also had received some accessions from Carystus
in Eubœa, and from several of the Cyclades--so that the losses sustained
by the storm at Sepias and the fights at Artemisium, if not wholly made
up, were at least in part repaired, while the fleet remained still
prodigiously superior in number to that of the Greeks.
At the beginning of the Peloponnesian War, near fifty years after these
events, the Corinthian envoys reminded Sparta that she had allowed
Xerxes time to arrive from the extremity of the earth at the threshold
of the Peloponnesus, before she took any adequate precautions against
him; a reproach true almost to the letter. It was only when roused and
terrified by the news of the death of Leonidas, that the Lacedæmonians
and the other Peloponnesians began to put forth their full strength. But
it was then too late to perform the promise made to Athens, of taking up
a position in Bœotia so as to protect Attica. To defend the isthmus of
Corinth was all that they now thought of, and seemingly all that was now
open to them: thither they rushed with all their available population
under the conduct of Cleombrotus, king of Sparta (brother of Leonidas),
and began to draw fortifications across it, as well as to break up
the Scironian road from Megara to Corinth, with every mark of anxious
energy. The Lacedæmonians, Arcadians, Eleans, Corinthians, Sicyonians,
Epidaurians, Phliasians, Trœzenians, and Hermionians, were all present
here in full numbers; many myriads of men (bodies of ten thousand each)
working and bringing materials night and day. As a defence to themselves
against attack by land, this was an excellent position: they considered
it as their last chance, abandoning all hope of successful resistance at
sea. But they forgot that a fortified isthmus was no protection even to
themselves against the navy of Xerxes, while it professedly threw out
not only Attica, but also Megara and Ægina. And thus rose a new peril
to Greece from the loss of Thermopylæ: no other position could be found
which, like that memorable strait, comprehended and protected at once all
the separate cities. The disunion thus produced brought them within a
hair’s breadth of ruin.
ATHENS ABANDONED
If the causes of alarm were great for the Peloponnesians, yet more
desperate did the position of the Athenians appear. Expecting, according
to agreement, to find a Peloponnesian army in Bœotia ready to sustain
Leonidas, or at any rate to co-operate in the defence of Attica, they
had taken no measures to remove their families or property: but they
saw with indignant disappointment as well as dismay, on retreating from
Artemisium, that the conqueror was in full march from Thermopylæ, that
the road to Attica was open to him, and that the Peloponnesians were
absorbed exclusively in the defence of their own isthmus and their own
separate existence. The fleet from Artemisium had been directed to muster
at the harbour of Trœzen, there to await such reinforcements as could be
got together: but the Athenians entreated Eurybiades to halt at Salamis,
so as to allow them a short time for consultation in the critical state
of their affairs, and to aid them in the transport of their families.
While Eurybiades was thus staying at Salamis, several new ships which had
reached Trœzen came over to join him; and in this way Salamis became for
a time the naval station of the Greeks, without any deliberate intention
beforehand.
Meanwhile Themistocles and the Athenian seamen landed at Phalerum, and
made their mournful entry into Athens. Gloomy as the prospect appeared,
there was little room for difference of opinion, and still less room
for delay. The authorities and the public assembly at once issued a
proclamation, enjoining every Athenian to remove his family out of the
country in the best way he could. We may conceive the state of tumult and
terror which followed on this unexpected proclamation, when we reflect
that it had to be circulated and acted upon throughout all Attica, from
Sunium to Oropus, within the narrow space of less than six days; for no
longer interval elapsed before Xerxes actually arrived at Athens, where
indeed he might have arrived even sooner.
The whole Grecian fleet was doubtless employed in carrying out the
helpless exiles; mostly to Trœzen, where a kind reception and generous
support were provided for them,--the Trœzenian population being seemingly
semi-Ionic, and having ancient relations of religion as well as of
traffic with Athens,--but in part also to Ægina: there were, however,
many who could not, or would not, go farther than Salamis. Themistocles
impressed upon the sufferers that they were only obeying the oracle,
which had directed them to abandon the city and to take refuge behind
the wooden walls; and either his policy, or the mental depression of the
time, gave circulation to other stories, intimating that even the divine
inmates of the Acropolis were for a while deserting it. In the ancient
temple of Athene Polias on that rock, there dwelt, or was believed
to dwell, as guardian to the sanctuary and familiar attendant of the
goddess, a sacred serpent, for whose nourishment a honey cake was placed
once in the month. The honey cake had been hitherto regularly consumed;
but at this fatal moment the priestess announced that it remained
untouched: the sacred guardian had thus set the example of quitting the
acropolis, and it behooved the citizens to follow the example, confiding
in the goddess herself for future return and restitution.
The migration of so many ancient men, women, and children, was a scene
of tears and misery inferior only to that which would have ensued on the
actual capture of the city.[31] Some few individuals, too poor to hope
for maintenance, or too old to care for life elsewhere,--confiding,
moreover, in their own interpretation of the wooden wall which the
Pythian priestess had pronounced to be inexpugnable,--shut themselves up
in the Acropolis along with the administrators of the temple, obstructing
the entrance or western front with wooden doors and palisades. When we
read how great were the sufferings of the population of Attica near
half a century afterwards, compressed for refuge within the spacious
fortifications of Athens at the first outbreak of the Peloponnesian War,
we may form some faint idea of the incalculably greater misery which
overwhelmed an emigrant population, hurrying, they knew not whither, to
escape the long arm of Xerxes. Little chance did there seem that they
would ever revisit their homes except as his slaves.
In the midst of circumstances thus calamitous and threatening, neither
the warriors nor the leaders of Athens lost their energy--arm as well
as mind was strung to the loftiest pitch of human resolution. Political
dissensions were suspended: Themistocles proposed to the people a decree,
and obtained their sanction, inviting home all who were under sentence of
temporary banishment: moreover, he not only included but even specially
designated among them his own great opponent Aristides, now in the
third year of ostracism. Xanthippus the accuser, and Cimon, the son of
Miltiades, were partners in the same emigration: the latter, enrolled by
his scale of fortune among the horsemen of the state, was seen with his
companions cheerfully marching through the Ceramicus to dedicate their
bridles in the Acropolis, and to bring away in exchange some of the
sacred arms there suspended, thus setting an example of ready service on
shipboard, instead of on horseback. It was absolutely essential to obtain
supplies of money, partly for the aid of the poorer exiles, but still
more for the equipment of the fleet; there were no funds in the public
treasury--but the senate of Areopagus, then composed in large proportion
of men from the wealthier classes, put forth all its public authority
as well as its private contributions and example to others, and thus
succeeded in raising the sum of eight drachmæ for every soldier serving.
This timely help was indeed partly obtained by the inexhaustible resource
of Themistocles, who, in the hurry of embarkation, either discovered or
pretended that the Gorgon’s head from the statue of Athene was lost,
and directing upon this ground every man’s baggage to be searched,
rendered any treasures, which private citizens might be carrying out,
available to the public service. By the most strenuous efforts, these few
important days were made to suffice for removing the whole population
of Attica,--those of military competence to the fleet at Salamis,--the
rest to some place of refuge,--together with as much property as the case
admitted. So complete was the desertion of the country, that the host
of Xerxes, when it became master, could not seize and carry off more
than five hundred prisoners. Moreover, the fleet itself, which had been
brought home from Artemisium partially disabled, was quickly repaired, so
that, by the time the Persian fleet arrived, it was again in something
like fighting condition.
THE FLEET AT SALAMIS
The combined fleet which had now got together at Salamis consisted
of three hundred and sixty-six ships,--a force far greater than at
Artemisium. Of these, no less than two hundred were Athenian; twenty
among which, however, were lent to the Chalcidians, and manned by them.
Forty Corinthian ships, thirty Æginetan, twenty Megarian, sixteen
Lacedæmonian, fifteen Sicyonian, ten Epidaurian, seven from Ambracia, and
as many from Eretria, five from Trœzen, three from Hermione, and the same
number from Leucas; two from Ceos, two from Styra, and one from Cythnos;
four from Naxos, despatched as a contingent to the Persian fleet, but
brought by the choice of their captains and seamen to Salamis;--all these
triremes, together with a small squadron of the inferior vessels called
penteconters, made up the total. From the great Grecian cities in Italy
there appeared only one trireme, a volunteer, equipped and commanded by
an eminent citizen named Phaÿllus, thrice victor at the Pythian games.
The entire fleet was thus a trifle larger than the combined force, three
hundred and fifty-eight ships, collected by the Asiatic Greeks at Lade,
fifteen years earlier, during the Ionic revolt. We may doubt, however,
whether this total, borrowed from Herodotus, be not larger than that
which actually fought a little afterwards at the battle of Salamis, and
which Æschylus gives decidedly as consisting of three hundred sail, in
addition to ten prime and chosen ships. That great poet, himself one of
the combatants, and speaking in a drama represented only seven years
after the battle, is better authority on the point even than Herodotus.
Hardly was the fleet mustered at Salamis, and the Athenian population
removed, when Xerxes and his host overran the deserted country, his fleet
occupying the roadstead of Phalerum with the coast adjoining. His land
force had been put in motion under the guidance of the Thessalians, two
or three days after the battle of Thermopylæ, and he was assured by some
Arcadians who came to seek service, that the Peloponnesians were, even at
that moment, occupied with the celebration of the Olympic games. “What
prize does the victor receive?” he asked. Upon the reply made, that the
prize was a wreath of the wild olive, Tritantæchmes, son of the monarch’s
uncle Artabanus, is said to have burst forth, notwithstanding the
displeasure both of the monarch himself and of the bystanders: “Heavens,
Mardonius, what manner of men are these against whom thou hast brought us
to fight! men who contend not for money, but for honour!” Whether this be
a remark really delivered, or a dramatic illustration imagined by some
contemporary of Herodotus, it is not the less interesting as bringing to
view a characteristic of Hellenic life, which contrasts not merely with
the manners of contemporary Orientals, but even with those of the earlier
Greeks themselves during the Homeric times.
Among all the various Greeks between Thermopylæ and the borders
of Attica, there were none except the Phocians disposed to refuse
submission: and they refused only because the paramount influence of
their bitter enemies the Thessalians made them despair of obtaining
favourable terms. Nor would they even listen to a proposition of the
Thessalians, who, boasting that it was in their power to guide as they
pleased the terrors of the Persian host, offered to insure lenient
treatment to the territory of Phocis, provided a sum of fifty talents
were paid to them. The proposition being indignantly refused, they
conducted Xerxes through the little territory of Doris, which _medised_
and escaped plunder, into the upper valley of the Cephisus, among the
towns of the inflexible Phocians. All of them were found deserted; the
inhabitants having previously escaped either to the wide-spreading
summit of Parnassus, called Tithorea, or even still farther, across that
mountain into the territory of the Ozolian Locrians. Ten or a dozen small
Phocian towns, the most considerable of which were Elatea and Hyampolis,
were sacked and destroyed by the invaders, nor was the holy temple and
oracle of Apollo at Abæ better treated than the rest: all its treasures
were pillaged, and it was then burnt. From Panopeus Xerxes detached
a body of men to plunder Delphi, marching with his main army through
Bœotia, in which country he found all the towns submissive and willing,
except Thespiæ and Platæa: both were deserted by their citizens, and
both were now burnt. From hence he conducted his army into the abandoned
territory of Attica, reaching without resistance the foot of the
Acropolis at Athens.
XERXES AT DELPHI
Very different was the fate of that division which he had detached from
Panopeus against Delphi: Apollo defended his temple here more vigorously
than at Abæ. The cupidity of the Persian king was stimulated by accounts
of the boundless wealth accumulated at Delphi, especially the profuse
donations of Crœsus. The Delphians, in the extreme of alarm, while
they sought safety for themselves on the heights of Parnassus, and for
their families by transport across the gulf into Achaia, consulted the
oracle whether they should carry away or bury the sacred treasures.
Apollo directed them to leave the treasures untouched, saying that he
was competent himself to take care of his own property. Sixty Delphians
alone ventured to remain, together with Aceratus, the religious superior:
but evidences of superhuman aid soon appeared to encourage them. The
sacred arms suspended in the interior cell, which no mortal hand was
ever permitted to touch, were seen lying before the door of the temple;
and when the Persians, marching along the road called Schiste, up that
rugged path under the steep cliffs of Parnassus which conducts to Delphi,
had reached the temple of Athene Pronœa, on a sudden, dreadful thunder
was heard, two vast mountain crags detached themselves and rushed down
with deafening noise among them, crushing many to death, the war shout
was also heard from the interior of the temple of Athene. Seized with a
panic terror, the invaders turned round and fled; pursued not only by the
Delphians, but also, as they themselves affirmed, by two armed warriors
of superhuman stature and destructive arm. The triumphant Delphians
confirmed this report, adding that the two auxiliaries were the heroes
Phylacus and Autonoüs, whose sacred precincts were close adjoining:
and Herodotus himself when he visited Delphi, saw in the sacred ground
of Athene the identical masses of rock which had overwhelmed the
Persians.[32] Thus did the god repel these invaders from his Delphian
sanctuary and treasures, which remained inviolate until one hundred and
thirty years afterwards, when they were rifled by the sacrilegious hands
of the Phocian Philomelus. On this occasion, as will be seen presently,
the real protectors of the treasures were the conquerors at Salamis and
Platæa.
ATHENS TAKEN
Four months had elapsed since the departure from Asia when Xerxes reached
Athens, the last term of his advance. He brought with him the members of
the Pisistratid family, who doubtless thought their restoration already
certain, and a few Athenian exiles attached to their interest. Though
the country was altogether deserted, the handful of men collected in the
Acropolis ventured to defy him: nor could all the persuasions of the
Pisistratids, eager to preserve the holy place from pillage, induce them
to surrender.
The Athenian Acropolis--a craggy rock rising abruptly about one hundred
and fifty feet, with a flat summit of about one thousand feet long from
east to west, by five hundred feet broad from north to south--had no
practicable access except on the western side: moreover, in all parts
where there seemed any possibility of climbing up, it was defended by the
ancient fortification called the Pelasgic wall. Obliged to take the place
by force, the Persian army was posted around the northern and western
sides, and commenced their operations from the eminence immediately
adjoining on the northwest, called Areopagus: from whence they bombarded,
if we may venture upon the expression, with hot missiles, the woodwork
before the gates; that is, they poured upon it multitudes of arrows with
burning tow attached to them. The wooden palisades and boarding presently
took fire and were consumed: but when the Persians tried to mount to the
assault by the western road leading up to the gate, the undaunted little
garrison still kept them at bay, having provided vast stones, which they
rolled down upon them in the ascent.
For a time the Great King seemed likely to be driven to the slow process
of blockade; but at length some adventurous men among the besiegers tried
to scale the precipitous rock before them on its northern side, hard
by the temple or chapel of Aglaurus, which lay nearly in front of the
Persian position, but behind the gates and the western ascent. Here the
rock was naturally so inaccessible, that it was altogether unguarded,
and seemingly even unfortified: moreover, the attention of the little
garrison was all concentrated on the host which fronted the gates. Hence
the separate escalading party was enabled to accomplish their object
unobserved, and to reach the summit in the rear of the garrison; who,
deprived of their last hope, either cast themselves headlong from the
walls, or fled for safety to the inner temple. The successful escaladers
opened the gates to the entire Persian host, and the whole Acropolis was
presently in their hands. Its defenders were slain, its temples pillaged,
and all its dwellings and buildings, sacred as well as profane, consigned
to the flames. The citadel of Athens fell into the hands of Xerxes by a
surprise, very much the same as that which had placed Sardis in those of
Cyrus.
Thus was divine prophecy fulfilled: Attica passed entirely into the hands
of the Persians, and the conflagration of Sardis was retaliated upon the
home and citadel of its captors, as it also was upon their sacred temple
of Eleusis. Xerxes immediately despatched to Susa intelligence of the
fact, which is said to have excited unmeasured demonstrations of joy,
confuting, seemingly, the gloomy predictions of his uncle Artabanus.
On the next day but one, the Athenian exiles in his suite received his
orders, or perhaps obtained his permission, to go and offer sacrifice
amidst the ruins of the Acropolis, and atone, if possible, for the
desecration of the ground: they discovered that the sacred olive tree
near the chapel of Erechtheus, the special gift of the goddess Athene,
though burnt to the ground by the recent flames, had already thrown
out a fresh shoot of one cubit long,--at least the piety of restored
Athens afterwards believed this encouraging portent, as well as that
which was said to have been seen by Dicæus, an Athenian companion of the
Pisistratids, in the Thriasian plain.
It was now the day set apart for the celebration of the Eleusinian
mysteries; and though in this sorrowful year there was no celebration,
nor any Athenians in the territory, Dicæus still fancied that he
beheld the dust and heard the loud multitudinous chant, which was wont
to accompany in ordinary times the processional march from Athens to
Eleusis. He would even have revealed the fact to Xerxes himself, had
not Demaratus deterred him from doing so: but he as well as Herodotus
construed it as an evidence that the goddesses themselves were passing
over from Eleusis to help the Athenians at Salamis. But whatever may
have been received in after times, on that day certainly no man could
believe in the speedy resurrection of conquered Athens as a free
city: not even if he had witnessed the portent of the burnt olive
tree suddenly sprouting afresh with preternatural vigour. So hopeless
did the circumstances of the Athenians then appear, not less to their
confederates assembled at Salamis than to the victorious Persians.
About the time of the capture of the Acropolis, the Persian fleet also
arrived safely in the Bay of Phalerum, reinforced by ships from Carystus
as well as from various islands of the Cyclades, so that Herodotus
reckons it to have been as strong as before the terrible storm at Sepias
Acte--an estimate certainly not admissible.
XERXES INSPECTS HIS FLEET
Soon after their arrival, Xerxes himself descended to the shore to
inspect the fleet, as well as to take counsel with the various naval
leaders about the expediency of attacking the hostile fleet, now so near
him in the narrow strait between Salamis and the coasts of Attica. He
invited them all to take their seats in an assembly, wherein the king
of Sidon occupied the first place and the king of Tyre the second. The
question was put to each of them separately by Mardonius, and when we
learn that all pronounced in favour of immediate fighting, we may be
satisfied that the decided opinion of Xerxes himself must have been
well known to them beforehand. One exception alone was found to this
unanimity,--Artemisia, queen of Halicarnassus in Caria; into whose mouth
Herodotus puts a speech of some length, deprecating all idea of fighting
in the narrow strait of Salamis, predicting that if the land-force were
moved forwards to attack the Peloponnesus, the Peloponnesians in the
fleet at Salamis would return for the protection of their own homes,
and thus the fleet would disperse, the rather as there was little or no
food in the island, and intimating, besides, unmeasured contempt for the
efficacy of the Persian fleet and seamen as compared with the Greek,
as well as for the subject contingents of Xerxes generally. That Queen
Artemisia gave this prudent counsel, there is no reason to question; and
the historian of Halicarnassus may have had means of hearing the grounds
on which her opinion rested: but we find a difficulty in believing
that she can have publicly delivered any such estimate of the maritime
subjects of Persia--an estimate not merely insulting to all who heard
it, but at the time not just, though it had come to be nearer the truth
at the time when Herodotus wrote, and though Artemisia herself may have
lived to entertain the conviction afterwards. Whatever may have been
her reasons, the historian tells us that friends as well as rivals were
astonished at her rashness in dissuading the monarch from a naval battle,
and expected that she would be put to death. But Xerxes heard the advice
with perfect good temper, and even esteemed the Carian queen the more
highly: though he resolved that the opinion of the majority, or his own
opinion, should be acted upon: and orders were accordingly issued for
attacking the next day, while the land-force should move forwards towards
the Peloponnesus.
Whilst, on the shore of Phalerum, an omnipotent will compelled seeming
unanimity and precluded all real deliberation, great, indeed, was the
contrast presented by the neighbouring Greek armament at Salamis, among
the members of which unmeasured dissension had been reigning. It has
already been stated that the Greek fleet had originally got together at
that island, not with any view of making it a naval station, but simply
in order to cover and assist the emigration of the Athenians. This object
being accomplished, and Xerxes being already in Attica, Eurybiades
convoked the chiefs to consider what position was the fittest for a naval
engagement. Most of them, especially those from the Peloponnesus, were
averse to remaining at Salamis, and proposed that the fleet should be
transferred to the isthmus of Corinth, where it would be in immediate
communication with the Peloponnesian land-force, so that in case of
defeat at sea, the ships would find protection on shore, and the men
would join in the land service--while if worsted in a naval action near
Salamis, they would be inclosed in an island from whence there were no
hopes of escape. In the midst of the debate, a messenger arrived with
news of the capture and conflagration of Athens and her Acropolis by the
Persians: and such was the terror produced by this intelligence, that
some of the chiefs, without even awaiting the conclusion of the debate
and the final vote, quitted the council forthwith, and began to hoist
sail, or prepare their rowers, for departure. The majority came to a vote
for removing to the isthmus, but as night was approaching, actual removal
was deferred until the next morning.
Now was felt the want of a position like that of Thermopylæ, which had
served as a protection to all the Greeks at once, so as to check the
growth of separate fears and interests. We can hardly wonder that the
Peloponnesian chiefs--the Corinthian in particular, who furnished so
large a naval contingent, and within whose territory the land-battle
at the isthmus seemed about to take place--should manifest such an
obstinate reluctance to fight at Salamis, and should insist on removing
to a position where, in case of naval defeat, they could assist, and
be assisted by, their own soldiers on land. On the other hand, Salamis
was not only the most favourable position, in consequence of its narrow
strait, for the inferior numbers of the Greeks, but could not be
abandoned without breaking up the unity of the allied fleet; since Megara
and Ægina would thus be left uncovered, and the contingents of each would
immediately retire for the defence of their homes, while the Athenians
also, a large portion of whose expatriated families were in Salamis and
Ægina, would be in like manner distracted from combined maritime efforts
at the isthmus. If transferred to the latter place, probably not even
the Peloponnesians themselves would have remained in one body; for the
squadrons of Epidaurus, Trœzen, Hermione, etc., each fearing that the
Persian fleet might make a descent on one or other of these separate
ports, would go home to repel such a contingency, in spite of the efforts
of Eurybiades to keep them together. Hence the order for quitting
Salamis and repairing to the isthmus was nothing less than a sentence of
extinction for all combined maritime defence; and it thus became doubly
abhorrent to all those who, like the Athenians, Æginetans, and Megarians,
were also led by their own separate safety to cling to the defence of
Salamis. In spite of all such opposition, however, and in spite of the
protest of Themistocles, the obstinate determination of the Peloponnesian
leaders carried the vote for retreat, and each of them went to his ship
to prepare for it on the following morning.
SCHEMES OF THEMISTOCLES
When Themistocles returned to his ship, with the gloom of this melancholy
resolution full upon his mind, and with the necessity of providing for
removal of the expatriated Athenian families in the island as well as
for that of the squadron, he found an Athenian friend named Mnesiphilus,
who asked him what the synod of chiefs had determined. Concerning
this Mnesiphilus, who is mentioned generally as a sagacious practical
politician, we unfortunately have no particulars: but it must have been
no common man whom fame selected, truly or falsely, as the inspiring
genius of Themistocles. On learning what had been resolved, Mnesiphilus
burst out into remonstrance on the utter ruin which its execution would
entail: there would presently be neither any united fleet to fight,
nor any aggregate cause and country to fight for. He vehemently urged
Themistocles again to open the question, and to press by every means
in his power for a recall of the vote for retreat, as well as for a
resolution to stay and fight at Salamis.
Themistocles had already in vain tried to enforce the same view: but
disheartened as he was by ill success, the remonstrances of a respected
friend struck him so forcibly as to induce him to renew his efforts. He
went instantly to the ship of Eurybiades, asked permission to speak with
him, and being invited aboard, reopened with him alone the whole subject
of the past discussion, enforcing his own views as emphatically as he
could. In this private communication, all the arguments bearing upon the
case were more unsparingly laid open than it had been possible to do in
an assembly of the chiefs, who would have been insulted if openly told
that they were likely to desert the fleet when once removed from Salamis.
Speaking thus freely and confidentially, and speaking to Eurybiades
alone, Themistocles was enabled to bring him partially round, and even
prevailed upon him to convene a fresh synod. So soon as this synod had
assembled, even before Eurybiades had explained the object and formally
opened the discussion, Themistocles addressed himself to each of the
chiefs separately, pouring forth at large his fears and anxiety as to the
abandonment of Salamis: insomuch that the Corinthian Adimantus rebuked
him by saying, “Themistocles, those who in the public festival-matches
rise up before the proper signal, are scourged.” “True,” rejoined the
Athenian, “but those who lag behind the signal win no crowns.”
Eurybiades then explained to the synod that doubts had arisen in his
mind, and that he called them together to reconsider the previous
resolve: upon which Themistocles began the debate, and vehemently
enforced the necessity of fighting in the narrow sea of Salamis and
not in the open waters at the isthmus, as well as of preserving Megara
and Ægina: contending that a naval victory at Salamis would be not less
effective for the defence of the Peloponnesus than if it took place at
the isthmus, whereas, if the fleet were withdrawn to the latter point,
they would only draw the Persians after them. Nor did he omit to add,
that the Athenians had a prophecy assuring to them victory in this, their
own island. But his speech made little impression on the Peloponnesian
chiefs, who were even exasperated at being again summoned to reopen
a debate already concluded, and concluded in a way which they deemed
essential to their safety. In the bosom of the Corinthian Adimantus,
especially, this feeling of anger burst all bounds. He sharply denounced
the presumption of Themistocles, and bade him be silent as a man who had
now no free Grecian city to represent, Athens being in the power of the
enemy: nay, he went so far as to contend that Eurybiades had no right to
count the vote of Themistocles, until the latter could produce some free
city as accrediting him to the synod.
Such an attack, alike ungenerous and insane, upon the leader of more
than half of the whole fleet, demonstrates the ungovernable impatience
of the Corinthians to carry away the fleet to their isthmus: it provoked
a bitter retort against them from Themistocles, who reminded them
that while he had around him two hundred well-manned ships, he could
procure for himself anywhere both city and territory as good or better
than Corinth. But he now saw clearly that it was hopeless to think
of enforcing his policy by argument, and that nothing would succeed
except the direct language of intimidation. Turning to Eurybiades,
and addressing him personally, he said: “If thou wilt stay here, and
fight bravely here, all will turn out well: but if thou wilt not stay,
thou wilt bring Hellas to ruin. For with us, all our means of war are
contained in our ships. Be thou yet persuaded by me. If not, we Athenians
shall migrate with our families on board, just as we are, to Siris in
Italy, which is ours from of old, and which the prophecies announce that
we are one day to colonise. You chiefs then, when bereft of allies like
us, will hereafter recollect what I am now saying.”
Eurybiades had before been nearly convinced by the impressive pleading of
Themistocles. But this last downright menace clenched his determination,
and probably struck dumb even the Corinthian and Peloponnesian opponents:
for it was but too plain, that without the Athenians the fleet was
powerless. He did not, however, put the question again to vote, but took
upon himself to rescind the previous resolution and to issue orders for
staying at Salamis to fight. In this order all acquiesced, willing or
unwilling; the succeeding dawn saw them preparing for fight instead of
for retreat, and invoking the protection and companionship of the Æacid
heroes of Salamis,--Telamon and Ajax: they even sent a trireme to Ægina
to implore Æacus himself and the remaining Æacids. It seems to have been
on this same day, also, that the resolution of fighting at Salamis was
taken by Xerxes, whose fleet was seen in motion, towards the close of the
day, preparing for attack the next morning.
But the Peloponnesians, though not venturing to disobey the orders of
the Spartan admiral, still retained unabated their former fears and
reluctance, which began again after a short interval to prevail over
the formidable menace of Themistocles, and were further strengthened
by the advices from the isthmus. The messengers from that quarter
depicted the trepidation and affright of their absent brethren while
constructing their cross wall at that point, to resist the impending
land invasion. Why were they not there also, to join hands and to help
in the defence,--even if worsted at sea,--at least on land, instead of
wasting their efforts in defence of Attica, already in the hands of
the enemy? Such were the complaints which passed from man to man, with
many a bitter exclamation against the insanity of Eurybiades: at length
the common feeling broke out in public and mutinous manifestation, and
a fresh synod of the chiefs was demanded and convoked. Here the same
angry debate, and the same irreconcilable difference, was again renewed;
the Peloponnesian chiefs clamouring for immediate departure, while the
Athenians, Æginetans, and Megarians were equally urgent in favour of
staying to fight. It was evident to Themistocles that the majority of
votes among the chiefs would be against him, in spite of the orders
of Eurybiades; and the disastrous crisis, destined to deprive Greece
of all united maritime defence, appeared imminent, when he resorted
to one last stratagem to meet the desperate emergency, by rendering
flight impossible. Contriving a pretext for stealing away from the
synod, he despatched a trusty messenger across the strait with a secret
communication to the Persian generals. Sicinnus his slave--seemingly an
Asiatic Greek, who understood Persian, and had perhaps been sold during
the late Ionic revolt, but whose superior qualities are marked by the
fact that he had the care and teaching of the children of his master--was
instructed to acquaint them privately and in the name of Themistocles,
who was represented as wishing success at heart to the Persians, that
the Greek fleet was not only in the utmost alarm, meditating immediate
flight, but that the various portions of it were in such violent
dissension, that they were more likely to fight against each other than
against any common enemy. A splendid opportunity, it was added, was thus
opened to the Persians, if they chose to avail themselves of it without
delay, first, to inclose and prevent their flight, and then to attack a
disunited body, many of whom would, when the combat began, openly espouse
the Persian cause.
Such was the important communication despatched by Themistocles across
the narrow strait, only a quarter of a mile in breadth at the narrowest
part, which divides Salamis from the neighbouring continent on which the
enemy were posted. It was delivered with so much address as to produce
the exact impression which he intended, and the glorious success which
followed caused it to pass for a splendid stratagem: had defeat ensued,
his name would have been covered with infamy. What surprises us the
most is, that after having reaped signal honour from it in the eyes of
the Greeks, as a stratagem, he lived to take credit for it, during the
exile of his latter days, as a capital service rendered to the Persian
monarch: nor is it improbable, when we reflect upon the desperate
condition of Grecian affairs at the moment, that such facility of double
interpretation was in part his inducement for sending the message.
It appears to have been delivered to Xerxes shortly after he had issued
his orders for fighting on the next morning: and he entered so greedily
into the scheme, as to direct his generals to close up the strait of
Salamis on both sides during the night, to the north as well as to the
south of the town of Salamis, at the risk of their heads if any opening
were left for the Greeks to escape. The station of the numerous Persian
fleet was along the coast of Attica,--its headquarters were in the
Bay of Phalerum, but doubtless parts of it would occupy those three
natural harbours, as yet unimproved by art, which belonged to the deme
of Piræus,--and would perhaps extend besides to other portions of the
western coast southward of Phalerum: while the Greek fleet was in the
harbour of the town called Salamis, in the portion of the island facing
Mount Ægaleos, in Attica.
During the night, a portion of the Persian fleet, sailing from Piræus
northward along the western coast of Attica, closed round to the north
of the town and harbour of Salamis, so as to shut up the northern issue
from the strait on the side of Eleusis: while another portion blocked up
the other issue between Piræus and the southeastern corner of the island,
landing a detachment of troops on the desert island of Psyttalea, near to
that corner. These measures were all taken during the night, to prevent
the anticipated flight of the Greeks, and then to attack them in the
narrow strait close on their own harbour the next morning.
Meanwhile, that angry controversy among the Grecian chiefs, in the midst
of which Themistocles had sent over his secret envoy, continued without
abatement and without decision. It was the interest of the Athenian
general to prolong the debate, and to prevent any concluding vote until
the effect of his stratagem should have rendered retreat impossible: nor
was prolongation difficult in a case so critical, where the majority of
chiefs was on one side and that of naval force on the other--especially
as Eurybiades himself was favourable to the view of Themistocles.
Accordingly, the debate was still unfinished at nightfall, and either
continued all night, or was adjourned to an hour before daybreak on the
following morning, when an incident, interesting as well as important,
gave to it a new turn.
The ostracised Aristides arrived at Salamis from Ægina. Since the
revocation of his sentence, proposed by Themistocles himself, he had
had no opportunity of revisiting Athens, and he now for the first time
rejoined his countrymen in their exile at Salamis; not uninformed of the
dissensions raging, and of the impatience of the Peloponnesians to retire
to the isthmus. He was the first to bring the news that such retirement
had become impracticable from the position of the Persian fleet, which
his own vessel, in coming from Ægina, had only eluded under favour of
night. He caused Themistocles to be invited out from the assembled synod
of chiefs, and after a generous exordium, wherein he expressed his
hope that their rivalry would for the future be only a competition in
doing good to their common country, apprised him that the new movement
of the Persians excluded all hope of now reaching the isthmus and
rendered farther debate useless. Themistocles expressed his joy at the
intelligence, and communicated his own secret message whereby he had
himself brought the movement about, in order that the Peloponnesian
chiefs might be forced to fight at Salamis, even against their own
consent. He moreover desired Aristides to go himself into the synod, and
communicate the news: for if it came from the lips of Themistocles, the
Peloponnesians would treat it as a fabrication. So obstinate indeed was
their incredulity, that they refused to accept it as truth even on the
assertion of Aristides: nor was it until the arrival of a Tenian vessel,
deserting from the Persian fleet, that they at last brought themselves
to credit the actual posture of affairs and the entire impossibility of
retreat. Once satisfied of this fact, they prepared themselves at dawn
for the impending battle.
THE BATTLE OF SALAMIS
Having caused his land-force to be drawn up along the shore opposite to
Salamis, Xerxes had erected for himself a lofty seat, or throne, upon
one of the projecting declivities of Mount Ægaleos, near the Heracleum,
and immediately overhanging the sea, from whence he could plainly review
all the phases of the combat and the conduct of his subject troops. He
was persuaded himself that they had not done their best at Artemisium,
in consequence of his absence, and that his presence would inspire them
with fresh valour: moreover, his royal scribes stood ready by his side to
take the names both of the brave and of the backward combatants. On the
right wing of his fleet--which approached Salamis on the side of Eleusis,
and was opposed to the Athenians on the Grecian left--were placed the
Phœnicians and Egyptians; on his left wing the Ionians, approaching
from the side of Piræus, and opposed to the Lacedæmonians, Æginetans,
and Megarians. The seamen of the Persian fleet, however, had been on
shipboard all night, in making that movement which had brought them into
their actual position: while the Greek seamen now began without previous
fatigue, fresh from the animated harangues of Themistocles and the other
leaders: moreover, just as they were getting on board, they were joined
by the triremes which had been sent to Ægina to bring to their aid Æacus,
with the other Æacid heroes. Honoured with this precious heroic aid,
which tended so much to raise the spirits of the Greeks, the Æginetan
trireme now arrived just in time to take her post in the line, having
eluded pursuit from the intervening enemy.
The Greeks rowed forward from the shore to attack with the usual pæan,
or war-shout, which was confidently returned by the Persians; and the
latter were the most forward of the two to begin the fight: for the Greek
seamen, on gradually nearing the enemy, became at first disposed to
hesitate, and even backed water for a space, so that some of them touched
ground on their own shore: until the retrograde movement was arrested by
a supernatural feminine figure hovering over them, who exclaimed, with a
voice that rang through the whole fleet, “Ye worthies, how much farther
are ye going to back water?” The very circulation of this fable attests
the dubious courage of the Greeks at the commencement of the battle. The
brave Athenian captains Aminias and Lycomedes (the former, brother of
the poet Æschylus) were the first to obey either the feminine voice or
the inspirations of their own ardour: though according to the version
current at Ægina, it was the Æginetan ship, the carrier of the Æacid
heroes, which first set this honourable example. The Naxian Democritus
was celebrated by Simonides as the third ship in action. Aminias, darting
forth from the line, charged with the beak of his ship full against
a Phœnician, and the two became entangled so that he could not again
get clear; other ships came in aid on both sides, and the action thus
became general. Herodotus, with his usual candour, tells us that he
could procure few details about the action, except as to what concerned
Artemisia, the queen of his own city: so that we know hardly anything
beyond the general facts. But it appears that, with the exception of the
Ionic Greeks, many of whom--apparently a greater number than Herodotus
likes to acknowledge--were lukewarm, and some even averse, the subjects
of Xerxes conducted themselves generally with great bravery: Phœnicians,
Cyprians, Cilicians, Egyptians, vied with the Persians and Medes, serving
as soldiers on shipboard, in trying to satisfy the exigent monarch who
sat on shore watching their behaviour.
Their signal defeat was not owing to any want of courage, but, first,
to the narrow space which rendered their superior number a hindrance
rather than a benefit: next, to their want of orderly line and discipline
as compared with the Greeks: thirdly, to the fact that, when once
fortune seemed to turn against them, they had no fidelity or reciprocal
attachment, and each ally was willing to sacrifice or even to run down
others, in order to effect his own escape. Their numbers and absence of
concert threw them into confusion, and caused them to run foul of each
other: those in the front could not recede, nor could those in the rear
advance: the oar blades were broken by collision, the steersmen lost
control of their ships, and could no longer adjust the ship’s course
so as to strike that direct blow with the beak which was essential in
ancient warfare. After some time of combat, the whole Persian fleet was
driven back and became thoroughly unmanageable, so that the issue was no
longer doubtful, and nothing remained except the efforts of individual
bravery to protract the struggle.
While the Athenian squadron on the left, which had the greatest
resistance to surmount, broke up and drove before them the Persian right,
the Æginetans on the right intercepted the flight of the fugitives to
Phalerum: Democritus, the Naxian captain, was said to have captured
five ships of the Persians with his own single trireme. The chief
admiral, Ariabignes, brother of Xerxes, attacked at once by two Athenian
triremes, fell, gallantly trying to board one of them, and the number of
distinguished Persians and Medes who shared his fate was great: the more
so, as few of them knew how to swim, while among the Greek seamen who
were cast into the sea, the greater number were swimmers, and had the
friendly shore of Salamis near at hand. It appears that the Phœnician
seamen of the fleet threw the blame of defeat upon the Ionic Greeks;
and some of them, driven ashore during the heat of the battle under the
immediate throne of Xerxes, excused themselves by denouncing the others
as traitors. The heads of the Ionic leaders might have been endangered if
the monarch had not seen with his own eyes an act of surprising gallantry
by one of their number. An Ionic trireme from Samothrace charged and
disabled an Attic trireme, but was herself almost immediately run down
by an Æginetan. The Samothracian crew, as their vessel lay disabled on
the water, made such excellent use of their missile weapons, that they
cleared the decks of the Æginetan, sprung on board, and became masters of
her. This exploit, passing under the eyes of Xerxes himself, induced him
to treat the Phœnicians as dastardly calumniators, and to direct their
heads to be cut off: his wrath and vexation, Herodotus tells us, were
boundless, and he scarcely knew on whom to vent it.
In this disastrous battle itself, as in the debate before the battle,
the conduct of Artemisia of Halicarnassus was such as to give him full
satisfaction. It appears that this queen maintained her full part in
the battle until the disorder had become irretrievable; she then sought
to escape, pursued by the Athenian trierarch, Aminias, but found her
progress obstructed by the number of fugitive or embarrassed comrades
before her. In this dilemma, she preserved herself from pursuit by
attacking one of her own comrades; she charged the trireme of the Carian
prince, Damasithymus of Calynda, ran it down and sunk it, so that the
prince with all his crew perished. Had Aminias been aware that the vessel
which he was following was that of Artemisia, nothing would have induced
him to relax in the pursuit, for the Athenian captains were all indignant
at the idea of a female invader assailing their city; but knowing her
ship only as one among the enemy, and seeing her thus charge and destroy
another enemy’s ship, he concluded her to be a deserter, turned his
pursuit elsewhere, and suffered her to escape. At the same time, it so
happened that the destruction of the ship of Damasithymus happened under
the eyes of Xerxes and of the persons around him on shore, who recognised
the ship of Artemisia, but supposed the ship destroyed to be a Greek.
Accordingly they remarked to him, “Master, seest thou not how well
Artemisia fights, and how she has just sunk an enemy’s ship?” Assured
that it was really her deed, Xerxes is said to have replied, “My men have
become women; my women, men.” Thus was Artemisia not only preserved, but
exalted to a higher place in the esteem of Xerxes by the destruction of
one of his own ships, among the crew of which not a man survived to tell
the true story.
Of the total loss of either fleet, Herodotus gives us no estimate; but
Diodorus states the number of ships destroyed on the Grecian side as
forty, on the Persian side as two hundred; independent of those which
were made prisoners with all their crews. To the Persian loss is to be
added the destruction of all those troops whom they had landed before
the battle in the island of Psyttalea: as soon as the Persian fleet was
put to flight, Aristides carried over some Grecian hoplites to that
island, overpowered the enemy, and put them to death to a man. This loss
appears to have been much deplored, as they were choice troops; in great
proportion the native Persian guards.
THE RETREAT OF XERXES
Great and capital as the victory was, there yet remained after it a
sufficient portion of the Persian fleet to maintain even maritime war
vigorously, not to mention the powerful land-force, as yet unshaken. And
the Greeks themselves, immediately after they had collected in their
island, as well as could be done, the fragments of shipping and the
dead bodies, made themselves ready for a second engagement. But they
were relieved from this necessity by the pusillanimity of the invading
monarch, in whom the defeat had occasioned a sudden revulsion from
contemptuous confidence, not only to rage and disappointment, but to
the extreme of alarm for his own personal safety. He was possessed with
a feeling of mingled wrath and mistrust against his naval force, which
consisted entirely of subject nations--Phœnicians, Egyptians, Cilicians,
Cyprians, Pamphylians, Ionic Greeks, etc., with a few Persians and Medes
serving on board, in a capacity probably not well suited to them. None
of these subjects had any interest in the success of the invasion, or
any other motive for service except fear, while the sympathies of the
Ionic Greeks were even decidedly against it. Xerxes now came to suspect
the fidelity, or undervalue the courage, of all these naval subjects;
he fancied that they could make no resistance to the Greek fleet, and
dreaded lest the latter should sail forthwith to the Hellespont, so as to
break down the bridge and intercept his personal retreat; for, upon the
maintenance of that bridge he conceived his own safety to turn, not less
than that of his father Darius, when retreating from Scythia, upon the
preservation of the bridge over the Danube. Against the Phœnicians, from
whom he had expected most, his rage broke out in such fierce threats,
that they stole away from the fleet in the night, and departed homeward.
Such a capital desertion made future naval struggle still more hopeless,
and Xerxes, though at first breathing revenge, and talking about a vast
mole or bridge to be thrown across the strait to Salamis, speedily ended
by giving orders to the whole fleet to leave Phalerum in the night, not
without disembarking, however, the best soldiers who served on board.
They were to make straight for the Hellespont, and there to guard the
bridge against his arrival.
This resolution was prompted by Mardonius, who saw the real terror which
beset his master, and read therein sufficient evidence of danger to
himself. When Xerxes despatched to Susa intelligence of his disastrous
overthrow, the feeling at home was not simply that of violent grief for
the calamity, and fear for the personal safety of the monarch--it was
farther embittered by anger against Mardonius, as the instigator of this
ruinous enterprise. That general knew full well that there was no safety
for him in returning to Persia with the shame of failure on his head: it
was better for him to take upon himself the chance of subduing Greece,
which he had good hopes of being yet able to do, and to advise the return
of Xerxes himself to a safe and easy residence in Asia. Such counsel
was eminently palatable to the present alarm of the monarch, while it
opened to Mardonius himself a fresh chance not only of safety, but of
increased power and glory. Accordingly, he began to reassure his master,
by representing that the recent blow was after all not serious--that it
had only fallen upon the inferior part of his force, and upon worthless
foreign slaves, like Phœnicians, Egyptians, etc., while the native
Persian troops yet remained unconquered and unconquerable, fully adequate
to execute the monarch’s revenge upon Hellas; that Xerxes might now very
well retire with the bulk of his army if he were disposed; and that he,
Mardonius, would pledge himself to complete the conquest, at the head of
three hundred thousand chosen troops.
This proposition afforded at the same time consolation for the monarch’s
wounded vanity, and safety for his person: his confidential Persians, and
Artemisia herself, on being consulted, approved of the step. The latter
had acquired his confidence by the dissuasive advice which she had given
before the recent deplorable engagement, and she had every motive now to
encourage a proposition indicating solicitude for his person, as well as
relieving herself from the obligation of further service. “If Mardonius
desires to remain (she remarked, contemptuously), by all means let him
have the troops: should he succeed, thou wilt be the gainer: should he
even perish, the loss of some of thy slaves is trifling, so long as thou
remainest safe, and thy house in power. Thou hast already accomplished
the purpose of thy expedition, in burning Athens.” Xerxes, while
adopting this counsel, and directing the return of his fleet, showed his
satisfaction with the Halicarnassian queen, by entrusting her with some
of his children, directing her to transport them to Ephesus.
The Greeks at Salamis learned with surprise and joy the departure of the
hostile fleet from the Bay of Phalerum, and immediately put themselves
in pursuit; following as far as the island of Andros without success.
Themistocles and the Athenians are even said to have been anxious to push
on forthwith to the Hellespont, and there break down the bridge of boats,
in order to prevent the escape of Xerxes, had they not been restrained by
the caution of Eurybiades and the Peloponnesians, who represented that
it was dangerous to detain the Persian monarch in the heart of Greece.
Themistocles readily suffered himself to be persuaded, and contributed
much to divert his countrymen from the idea; while he at the same time
sent the faithful Sicinnus a second time to Xerxes, with the intimation
that he, Themistocles, had restrained the impatience of the Greeks to
proceed without delay and burn the Hellespontine bridge, and that he had
thus, from personal friendship to the monarch, secured for him a safe
retreat. Though this is the story related by Herodotus, we can hardly
believe that, with the great Persian land-force in the heart of Attica,
there could have been any serious idea of so distant an operation as that
of attacking the bridge at the Hellespont. It seems more probable that
Themistocles fabricated the intention, with a view of frightening Xerxes
away, as well as of establishing a personal claim upon his gratitude in
reserve for future contingencies.
Such crafty manœuvres and long-sighted calculations of possibility,
seem extraordinary: but the facts are sufficiently attested--since
Themistocles lived to claim as well as to receive fulfilment of the
obligation thus conferred--and though extraordinary, they will not
appear inexplicable, if we reflect, first, that the Persian game, even
now, after the defeat of Salamis, was not only not desperate, but might
perfectly well have succeeded, if it had been played with reasonable
prudence: next, that there existed in the mind of this eminent man an
almost unparalleled combination of splendid patriotism, long-sighted
cunning, and selfish rapacity. Themistocles knew better than any one
else that the cause of Greece had appeared utterly desperate, only a few
hours before the late battle; moreover, a clever man, tainted with such
constant guilt, might naturally calculate on being one day detected and
punished, even if the Greeks proved successful.
He now employed the fleet among the islands of the Cyclades, for the
purpose of levying fines upon them as a punishment for adherence to the
Persian. He first laid siege to Andros, telling the inhabitants that he
came to demand their money, bringing with him two great gods--Persuasion
and Necessity. To which the Andrians replied, that “Athens was a great
city, and blest with excellent gods: but that they were miserably poor,
and that there were two unkind gods who always stayed with them and
would never quit the island--Poverty and Helplessness. In these gods the
Andrians put their trust, refusing to deliver the money required; for the
power of Athens could never overcome their inability.” While the fleet
was engaged in contending against the Andrians with their sad protecting
deities, Themistocles sent round to various other cities, demanding from
them private sums of money on condition of securing them from attack.
From Carystus, Paros, and other places, he thus extorted bribes for
himself apart from the other generals, but it appears that Andros was
found unproductive, and after no very long absence the fleet was brought
back to Salamis.
The intimation sent by Themistocles perhaps had the effect of hastening
the departure of Xerxes, who remained in Attica only a few days after
the battle of Salamis, and then withdrew his army through Bœotia into
Thessaly, where Mardonius made choice of the troops to be retained
for his future operations. He retained all the Persians, Medes, Sacæ,
Bactrians, and Indians, horse as well as foot, together with select
detachments of the remaining contingents: making in all, according to
Herodotus, three hundred thousand men. But as it was now the beginning of
September, and as sixty thousand out of his forces, under Artabazus, were
destined to escort Xerxes himself to the Hellespont, Mardonius proposed
to winter in Thessaly, and to postpone further military operations until
the ensuing spring.
[Illustration: THE VICTORY OF SALAMIS (BY CORMOT)]
Having left most of these troops under the orders of Mardonius in
Thessaly, Xerxes marched away with the rest to the Hellespont, by the
same road as he had taken in his advance a few months before. Respecting
his retreat, a plentiful stock of stories were circulated, inconsistent
with each other, fanciful, and even incredible: Grecian imagination, in
the contemporary poet Æschylus, as well as in the Latin moralisers Seneca
or Juvenal, delighted in handling this invasion with the maximum of light
and shadow, magnifying the destructive misery and humiliation of the
retreat so as to form an impressive contrast with the superhuman pride
of the advance, and illustrating the antithesis with unbounded license
of detail. The sufferings from want of provision were doubtless severe,
and are described as frightful and death-dealing: the magazines stored
up for the advancing march had been exhausted, so that the retiring army
were now forced to seize upon the corn of the country through which they
passed--an insufficient maintenance, eked out by leaves, grass, the bark
of trees, and other wretched substitutes for food. Plague and dysentery
aggravated their misery, and occasioned many to be left behind among the
cities through whose territory the retreat was carried; strict orders
being left by Xerxes that these cities should maintain and tend them.
After forty-five days’ march from Attica, he at length found himself at
the Hellespont, whither his fleet, retreating from Salamis, had arrived
long before him. But the short-lived bridge had already been knocked to
pieces by a storm, so that the army was transported on shipboard across
to Asia, where it first obtained comfort and abundance, and where the
change from privation to excess engendered new maladies. In the time of
Herodotus, the citizens of Abdera still showed the gilt scimitar and
tiara, which Xerxes had presented to them when he halted there in his
retreat, in token of hospitality and satisfaction: and they even went the
length of affirming that never, since his departure from Attica, had he
loosened his girdle until he reached their city. So fertile was Grecian
fancy in magnifying the terror of the repulsed invader--who re-entered
Sardis, with a broken army and humbled spirit, only eight months after he
had left it as the presumed conqueror of the western world.
THE SPOILS OF VICTORY
Meanwhile the Athenians and Peloponnesians, liberated from the immediate
presence of the enemy either on land or sea, and passing from the extreme
of terror to sudden ease and security, indulged in the full delight and
self-congratulation of unexpected victory. On the day before the battle,
Greece had seemed irretrievably lost: she was now saved even against all
reasonable hope, and the terrific cloud impending over her was dispersed.
In the division of the booty, the Æginetans were adjudged to have
distinguished themselves most in the action, and to be entitled to the
choice lot; while various tributes of gratitude were also set apart for
the gods. Among them were three Phœnician triremes, which were offered
in dedication to Ajax at Salamis, to Athene at Sunium, and to Poseidon
at the Isthmus of Corinth; further presents were sent to Apollo at
Delphi, who, on being asked whether he was satisfied, replied, that all
had done their duty to him except the Æginetans: from them he required
additional munificence on account of the prize awarded to them, and they
were constrained to dedicate in the temple four golden stars upon a staff
of brass, which Herodotus himself saw there. Next to the Æginetans,
the second place of honour was awarded to the Athenians; the Æginetan
Polycritus, and the Athenians Eumenes and Aminias, being ranked first
among the individual combatants.
Besides the first and second prizes of valour, the chiefs at the isthmus
tried to adjudicate among themselves the first and second prizes of skill
and wisdom. Each of them deposited two names on the altar of Poseidon:
and when these votes came to be looked at, it was found that each man had
voted for himself as deserving the first prize, but that Themistocles
had a large majority of votes for the second. The result of such voting
allowed no man to claim the first prize, nor could the chiefs give a
second prize without it; so that Themistocles was disappointed of his
reward, though exalted so much the higher, perhaps, through that very
disappointment, in general renown. He went shortly afterwards to Sparta,
where he received from the Lacedæmonians honours such as were never paid
before or afterwards to any foreigner. A crown of olive was indeed given
to Eurybiades as the first prize, but a like crown was at the same time
conferred on Themistocles as a special reward for unparalleled sagacity;
together with a chariot, the finest which the city afforded. Moreover,
on his departure, the three hundred select youths called _hippeis_, who
formed the active guard and police of the country, all accompanied him in
a body as escort of honour to the frontiers of Tegea. Such demonstrations
were so astonishing, from the haughty and immovable Spartans, that they
were ascribed by some authors to their fear lest Themistocles should be
offended by being deprived of the general prize.[b]
SYRACUSAN VICTORY OVER CARTHAGE
On the very same day on which the Persians were defeated at Salamis,
another portion of the Hellenic race, the Sicilian Greeks, also obtained
a victory over an immense barbarian force. There is reason to believe
that the invasion of Sicily by the Carthaginians was concerted with
Xerxes, and that the simultaneous attack on two distinct Grecian peoples,
by two immense armaments, was not merely the result of chance. It was,
however, in the internal affairs of Sicily that the Carthaginians sought
the pretext and the opportunity for their invasion. About the year 481
B.C., Theron, despot of Agrigentum, a relative of Gelo, the powerful
ruler of Syracuse, expelled Terillus from Himera, and took possession of
that town. Terillus, backed by some Sicilian cities which formed a kind
of Carthaginian party, applied to the Carthaginians to restore him. The
Carthaginians complied with the invitation; and in the year 480 B.C.,
Hamilcar landed at Panormus with a force composed of various nations,
which is said to have amounted to the enormous sum of three hundred
thousand men. Having drawn up his vessels on the beach, and protected
them with a rampart, Hamilcar proceeded to besiege the Himeræans, who
on their part prepared for an obstinate defence. At the instance of
Theron, Gelo marched to the relief of the town with fifty thousand foot
and five thousand horse. An obstinate and bloody engagement ensued,
which, by a stratagem of Gelo’s, was at length determined in his favour.
The ships of the Carthaginians were fired, and Hamilcar himself slain.
According to the statement of Diodorus, one hundred and fifty thousand
Carthaginians fell in the engagement, while the greater part of the
remainder surrendered at discretion, twenty ships alone escaping with a
few fugitives. This account may justly be regarded as an exaggeration;
yet it cannot be doubted that the victory was a decisive one, and the
number very great of the prisoners and slain.
In Sicily, Greek taste made the sinews of the prisoners subserve the
purposes of art; and many of the public structures which adorned and
distinguished Agrigentum rose by the labour of the captive Carthaginians.
Thus were the arms of Greece victorious on all sides, and the outposts of
Europe maintained against the incursions of the semi-barbarous hordes of
Asia and Africa.[f]
FOOTNOTES
[31] In the years 1821 and 1822, during the struggle which preceded the
liberation of Greece, the Athenians were forced to leave their country
and seek refuge in Salamis three several times. These incidents are
sketched in a manner alike interesting and instructive by Dr. Waddington,
in his _Visit to Greece_ (London, 1825), Letters vi, vii, x. He states,
p. 92, “Three times have the Athenians emigrated in a body, and sought
refuge from the sabre among the houseless rocks of Salamis. Upon these
occasions, I am assured, that many have dwelt in caverns, and many in
miserable huts, constructed on the mountain-side by their own feeble
hands. Many have perished too, from exposure to an intemperate climate;
many, from diseases contracted through the loathsomeness of their
habitations; many, from hunger and misery. On the retreat of the Turks,
the survivors returned to their country. But to what a country did they
return? To a land of desolation and famine; and in fact, on the first
reoccupation of Athens, after the departure of Omer Brioni, several
persons are known to have subsisted for some time on grass, till a supply
of corn reached the Piræus from Syra and Hydra.” In the war between the
Turks and Venetians in 1688, the population of Attica was forced to
emigrate to Salamis, Ægina, and Corinth.
[32] Compare the account given in Pausanias (X, 23) of the subsequent
repulse of Brennus and the Gauls from Delphi: in his account, the repulse
is not so exclusively the work of the gods as in that of Herodotus:
there is a larger force of human combatants in defence of the temple,
though greatly assisted by divine intervention: there is also loss on
both sides. A similar descent of crags from the summit is mentioned.
Many great blocks of stone and cliff are still to be seen near the spot,
which have rolled down from the top, and which remind the traveller of
these passages. The attack here described to have been made by order of
Xerxes upon the Delphian temple seems not easy to reconcile with the
words of Mardonius: still less can it be reconciled with the statement of
Plutarch, who says that the Delphian temple was burnt by the Medes.
[Illustration]