The history of circumstances under which I commenced reading the

book of M. Droz, _sur l’ art d’ étre heureux_, the substance of the

first chapter of which is given as above, will not be irrelevant,

I would hope, _to you_, if to others. It was a beautiful April

morning, and I had wandered away from the town, with the book

in my hand, among the hills. I inhaled a bland atmosphere that

just ruffled half formed leaves, and shook from trees, shrubs and

flowers the pearly drops and the delicious aroma of the season.

A dun, purple, smoky vapor veiled the brilliancy of the sun and

gave the face of nature its most exquisite coloring. A repose,

like sleep, seemed to rest upon the earth, only interrupted by the

ruminating of the flocks and herds on the hill sides. The bees

sped away to their nectar cells from tree and flower, leaving upon

the dark and fleeting line of their passage through the air a

lulling hum like the tones of an Eolian harp. A large town, with

its ceaseless and heavy roll of mingled sounds, lay outstretched

beneath my feet. Painted boats were slowly wending their way along

a canal from the town, and winding their course round the foot of

the hills. Before me was a vast panorama of activity, business,

commerce and all the accompaniments of a busy town. A few paces

behind me, and I was plunged in a forest where town and commerce

and life were hidden as if by the shifting of a scene, and the jay

screamed, and the woods showed as to the red man who had seen

them centuries before. A beautiful spring branch murmured by me in

its deep and flood-worn channel down the glen. A little advance

spread the town before me. A little retreat gave me back to the

wildness of nature in the forest. Here I had often enjoyed much of

the little that life allows us to enjoy, in quiet communion with

nature and my own thoughts. I had never experienced it in higher

measures than at this moment. Could I, by a volition, have arrested

the flight of time and the succession of sensations, here would I

have fixed the _punctum stans_ of existence, and been content to

have this scene always around me, and the enjoyment of this union

of meditation and repose, perpetual.

But a change came over my thoughts, as I read the quaint axiom,

laid down with such mathematical precision, _man is formed to be

happy_. What I saw and what I felt, my own consciousness assented

to the proposition. But, startled by a transient feeling of pain,

a new train of ideas succeeded. I have only to pass, said I, the

short interval between this repose, verdure, quietness and internal

satisfaction, to reach the scene of dust and smoke before me.

Besides spires and mansions, I shall see hovels, poor, blind, lame,

squalid, blaspheming youth, imbecile age, prostitutes, beggars,

haunts of felons and outlaws; and even in the abodes of what shows

external comfort and opulence, the sick and dying hanging in

agonies of suspense upon the countenance of their physician and

friends, as they catch gleams of hope or shades of despair from

their aspect. Many of these sick, even if they recover, will only

be restored to trembling age, to perpetual and incurable infirmity,

and to evils worse than death. Yet, unhappy in living, and afraid

to die, they cling to this wretched existence as though it were

the highest boon. These varied shades of misery that the picture

before me will present to the slightest inspection, in ten thousand

forms and combinations, are visible in every part of our world. I,

too, shall soon add to the deepness of the shading. My friends will

depart in succession; and in my turn, on the bed of death, I shall

look in the faces of those most dear to me, as I am compelled to

depart out of life. What an affecting contrast with what I see and

what I am!

Why there is this partial evil in the world is not a question which

I shall here attempt to vex; for I could add nothing to what has

already been said upon the subject. It is enough that the evil

does actually exist. Is it remediless? Can life be so spent as to

leave a balance of enjoyment set over against the evil? These are

my questions. There will always be inequality, ignorance, vice,

disease, a measureless amount of misery and death. What portion

of the evils of life can be cured? What portion must be manfully,

piously endured? What transient gleams of joy can be made to

illumine the depth of shade?

I yield entire faith to the doctrine before you, that, estimate

these evils as highly as you may, a balance of enjoyment may

still be struck in favor of life. I do not doubt, that more than

one half the suffering and sorrow which every individual endures

is simply of his own procuring, and not only that it might have

been wholly avoided, but that positive enjoyment might have been

substituted in its place. An inconceivable mass of misery would at

once be struck from the sum if, as I have already remarked, we knew

the physical, organic and moral laws of our being, and conformed

ourselves to them. A uniform, consistent and thorough education

would cure us of innumerable errors of opinion, injurious habits,

and a servile conformity to established and prescribed prejudices,

and would impart to us wisdom, force of character and resignation,

to enable us to sustain, as we ought, those that are unavoidable.

Imperfection, pain, decay and death, in the inevitable measures

belonging to organized beings, would remain. The dignity of true

philosophy, the stern consciousness of the necessity of courage,

profound and filial submission to the divine will, and the well

defined and investigated hopes of religion would accomplish the

remainder.

Consider one single evil--fear, unnecessary fear, an entirely

gratuitous infusion of bitterness in the cup of life. I ask the man

who has seen fourscore winters to tell me, were all that he has

suffered in his pilgrimage cast into one account, what would be the

greatest item in the sum? I believe that almost every one might

answer, that more than half might be charged to one single source

of suffering--fear--fear of opinion, reproach, shame, poverty,

pain, danger, disease and death. I pause not to consider the usual

dull illustrations of the wisdom and utility of assigning to us

the instinct of fear, to put us on our guard and to enable us to

ward off evils. It is not this instinctive shrinking and vigilance

to avoid evil that I consider. Let education have its most perfect

work in raising us superior to this servile and tormenting passion,

and too much of it would still remain. Of all that we have suffered

from fear, what portion has been of any service in shielding us

from that which we apprehended? Not only have we avoided no evil

in consequence, but the enervating indulgence of this passion

has taken from us our quickness of foresight, our coolness of

deliberation, our firmness of action and resolve, by the exercise

of which, we might have escaped all that we dreaded. We may

calculate then, that every pang we have felt from this source has

been just so much gratuitous agony.

Not only natural instincts, but acquired habits are transmitted;

and this evil of fearfulness, this foreboding of apprehension,

shaping the fashion of uncertain ills, has been the growing

inheritance of countless generations; and a shrinking and

effeminate timidity has been woven into our mental constitution

by nature. Education, instead of resisting, or counteracting, or

diminishing the transmitted mischief, has labored with terrible

effect, to make it a principle and a motive to action, and the

most efficient engine of the inculcated systems of morality and

religion. Fear of death, and a slavish terror, springing from

misapprehensions of the character of the divine being, and unmanly

and debilitating horrors in regard to the unknown future in another

life, these have been the chief sources of this evil. Terribly have

the father and the mother, the minister and the school-master, and

general prescription and example concurred, to strengthen this

barbarous instrument of governing, which never inspired a good

action, and which it would be cruel to apply to a slave. Horrible

have been the bondage, the mean abjectness of spirit, the long

agony of the soul, which this inculcation has inspired.--We have

been sedulously trained in a course of discipline which has made

us afraid of our own shadows in the dark, and inspired us with

shrinking and terror in view of a silent and peaceful corpse,

which, in the eye of sober reason, should originate associations no

more fearful, than a waxen figure. We, who are the victims of this

inborn and instinctive inheritance, we, who have had it inwoven by

precept, education and example, and the prevalent impression, that

it is one of the purest and most religious motives of action, are

best able from our own consciousness, and the memory of what we

have suffered from it, to present just views of it to others.--It

may be in us an ingrafted principle, too deep to be uprooted

by any rules, or reasons, or system of discipline; a habit too

unyieldingly become a part of our nature, to be overcome. But with

minds more docile, with temperaments more pliant, with habits

less fixed, it may be otherwise. The next generation may transmit

a more manly and less timid nature to the generations to come.

Education, building on the basis of minds of more force, may then

accomplish its perfect work, imbuing them with a filial confidence

in the Almighty, a sense of the beauty of well-doing, and a perfect

fearlessness in regard to everything, but doing wrong. The happier

generation of that era, will be spared the agony of all deaths, but

the single one of nature; and will be fortified by discipline, and

the force of general opinion and example, to regard this inevitable

law of our being, this merciful provision of providence, this rest

for the worn and weary, as the hireling regards the evening shade,

when he reposes from his labors and receives his reward. I shall

elsewhere advert to this evil in more detail, and point out such

remedies, as appear to me to be suggested by reason, education and

religion.

Note 2, page 41.

This classification of the great divisions of our species, as they

are occupied in the pursuit of happiness, seems to me to unite

truth with poetry and philosophy, and to be both happy and just.

The disappointed, who affirm that the earth offers no happiness,

the gloomy, who view life as a place of penance, austerity and

tears, the dissipated and voluptuous, who seek only pleasure, and

whose doctrine is, that life offers no happiness but in unbridled

indulgence, the ambitious, who consider happiness to consist only

in wealth, power and distinction, and a very numerous class, who

have no object in view, but to vegetate through life by chance,

constitute the great mass of mankind. The number of those who

have lived by system, and disciplined themselves to the wise and

calculating pursuit of happiness, has always been small. But

there have still been some, enough to prove the practicability

of the art.--Wherever we find a person, who declares that he has

lived happily, if his enjoyments have been of a higher kind,

than the mere vegetative easiness of a felicitous temperament

and an unthinking joyousness, we shall find on inquiry, that he

has been a philosopher in the highest and best sense. He may

scarcely understand the import of the term; but, however ignorant

of systems, and the learning of the schools, if he have made it

his chief business, to learn by the study of himself, and general

observation, how to be happy, he is the true sage. He may well

be content, let others regard him as they may; for he has put in

requisition the best wisdom of life. No one maxim, especially,

ever included more important and practical truth, than that, to be

happy, we must assiduously train ourselves to retain through life

a keen and juvenile freshness of sensibility to enjoyment, and

must early learn to anticipate the effect of experience and years

in cultivating a stern indifference, a strong spirit of endurance,

and unshrinking obtuseness to pain. It has been my fortune to see

examples of persons who enjoyed life even to old age with all the

ardor and the quick perception of the young, and who had always

been as remarkable for their impassive and heroic endurance of pain.

Note 3, page 43.

We are told, in ridicule of this study, that men have been very

happy without rules, and before any system had been laid down,

and will continue to be happy, unconscious of the means by which

they arrived at their enjoyment. So have men reasoned without

acquaintance with the rules of logic; but this proves not the

inutility of the study. Let the objector convince us that the happy

without thought and rules would not have been happier if they had

sought enjoyment with the keen and practical intelligence of a

Franklin.

Whatever men do well without definite aim and without rules, it is

clear to me, they would do better with these advantages. The same

argument equally militates with all means of moral instruction.

‘The world,’ the objector may say, ‘will proceed as before, say

what we may.’ But this would be deemed no just ground of objection

to an attempt to improve the age, though the efforts may have

little visible and apparent effect.

Note 4, page 44.

No term has been more hackneyed, in these days, than education.

We have had system upon system, and treatise upon treatise; and

more has been written and declaimed upon this subject than almost

any other. And yet, scarcely a word has been said upon a grand

and radical defect in all existing systems which reduces to a

very humble scale the results of the best concerted efforts. I

lay out of the question all other incongruities, that I might

easily mention, and come directly to that which I have chiefly in

my mind. Each of the different instructors, through whose forming

hands the pupil passes, communicates to him different, militant

and incompatible impulses; so that, instead of a continuous

operation and an onward movement, it seems to be the work of each

successive teacher to undo that of all the others. The father and

mother, besides various minor inculcations, labor, as their highest

object, to infuse into the mind of their child, ambition, the

desire of preëminence and distinction. The school-master instils

the same principles under such different circumstances as to

render the envy, rivalry and competition of the school-room almost

another series of impulses. The minister and the catechism enjoin

humility, meekness and a disposition to prefer others in honor

before themselves. ‘Be honest and high-minded,’ say the parents

and teachers. ‘Be adroit, and circumvent those who are watching

to take advantage of your weakness and inexperience,’ says the

master at the counting-desk. The elder friends teach one class of

maxims, and the younger another. The actual world inculcates rules

different from all the rest. Thus the parents, the school-master,

the minister, the politician, society and the world are continually

varying the direction of the youthful traveller. No wonder that

most people either have no character, or one that is a compound of

the most incongruous elements. A pupil, to have a strong, wise,

marked and efficient character, should have had it steadily trained

to one end; and every impulse ought to have been in a right line

and concurrent with every other. Such must be the case before

honest and uniform characters will be formed.

There is little force in the objection, that he who has not been

constantly happy himself ought not to presume to teach others to

be happy. On the contrary, as the author beautifully suggests,

none can discuss, with so much experience and force of truth, the

dangers of shipwreck, as they who have themselves suffered it. If

the art of happiness can be taught, the teacher must necessarily

have paid the price of a qualification to impart it, in having

been himself unhappy. Conscious that he had the susceptibility of

enjoyment, and wanted only the right direction of the means, he

will be able to set up way-marks, as a warning to others, at the

points where he remembers that he went astray himself.

Note 6, page 45.

The necessity of moderating our desires and reducing them within

the limits of what we may reasonably hope to acquire, has been

the beaten theme of prose and song for so many ages that the

triteness of repetition has finally caused the great truth to

be almost disregarded by moralists. Yet, who can calculate the

sum of torment that has been inflicted by wild and unreasonable

desires, by visionary and puerile expectations, beyond all

probable bounds of means to realize them, indulged and fostered

until they have acquired the force of habit! Whose memory cannot

recur to sufferings from envy and ill will, generated by cupidity,

for the possessions and advantages of others that we have not!

Who can count the pangs which he has endured from extravagant

and unattainable wishes! Poetry calls our mortal sojourn a vale

of tears; yet what ingenuity to multiply the gratuitous means

of self-torment! Has another health, wealth, beauty, fortune,

endowment, which I have not? Envy will neither take them from

him, nor transfer them to me. Why, then, should I allow vultures

to prey upon my spirit? Learn neither to regret what you want

and cannot supply, nor to hate him who is more fortunate. With

all his apparent advantages over you, he wants, perhaps, what

you may possess, a tranquil mind. There is little doubt that you

are the happier person if you contemplate his advantages and his

possessions with a cheerful and unrepining spirit.

I present two considerations only, as inducements to control and

regulate your desires. 1. In indulging them beyond reason you are

fostering internal enemies and becoming a self-tormentor. In the

quaint language of the ancient divines, they are like fire, good

servants but terrible masters. 2d. The higher gifts of fortune, the

common objects of envious desire, are awarded to but a few. The

number of those who may entertain any reasonable hope of reaching

them is very small. But every one can moderate his desires. Every

one can set bounds to his ambition. Every one can limit his

expectations. What influence can fortune, events, or power exercise

over a person, who has learned to be content with a little, and

who has acquired courage to resign even that without repining?

Franklin might well smile at the impotent malice of those who would

deprive him of his means and his business, when he proved to them

that he could live on turnips and rain water. It is not the less

true or important, because it has been a million times said, that

happiness, the creature of the mind, dwells not in external things.

Note 7, page 47.

Wherever civilized man has been found, the first effort of his

mind, beyond the attainment of his animal wants, has been to

travel into the regions of imagination, to create a nobler and

more beautiful world than the dull and common-place existing one,

to assign to man a higher character and purer motives than belong

to the actual race. To possess a frame inaccessible to pain and

decay, and to dwell in eternal spring, surrounded by beauty and

truth, is an instinctive desire. A mind of any fertility can

create and arrange such a scene; and in this dreaming occupation

the sensations are tranquillizing and pleasant beyond the more

exciting enjoyment of actual fruition. With the author, I deem

the propensity for this sort of meditation neither unworthy in

itself, nor tending to consequences to be deprecated. So far as

my own experience goes, and I am not without my share, it neither

enervates nor satiates. It furnishes enjoyment that is calm and

soothing; and such enjoyment, instead of enfeebling, invigorates

the mind to sustain trials and sorrows. Why should we not enter

into every enjoyment that is followed by no painful consequences?

Why should we not be happy when we may? Is he not innocently

employed who is imagining a fairer scene--a better world--more

benevolence, and more joy than this ‘visible diurnal sphere’

affords? Addison is never presented to me in a light so amiable

as when he relates his day-dreams, his universal empire, in which

he puts down all folly and all wickedness, and makes all his

personages good and happy. Every writer who has produced a romance

worth reading, has been endowed in this way, as a matter of course;

and I confidently believe that the greatest and best of men have

been most strongly inclined to this sort of mental creation. May

not their noblest achievements have been the patterns of those

archetypes? I have no doubt that imaginings infinitely more

interesting than any recorded in romances, Arabian tales, or any

other work of fiction, have imparted their transient exhilaration

to meditative minds, and have passed away with the things that

never grew into the material and concrete grossness of sensible

existence. If ink and paper and printing could have been created as

cheaply and readily as a new earth and better men and women, and

scenes more like what we hope for at last, the world would have had

bequeathed to it more volumes, than would have weighed down all

the ponderous dulness of by-gone romance. I cannot assure myself,

that you would have been amused, or instructed in reading; but you

would then have been able to form some idea of the hours of pain,

embarrassment, lack of all external means of pleasant occupation,

journeying, cold and watching, that have been beguiled by this

employment. I only add that, so far as my experience extends, the

first calm days of spring, and the period of Indian summer in

autumn are most propitious to this sort of revery.

Note 8, page 48.

These and the subsequent views of ambition in this essay of M.

Droz, have been the theme of severe and sweeping strictures upon

the general tendency of his book. Ambitious and aspiring men will

find it ridiculous, of course, to exact, as a pre-requisite to

the pursuit of happiness, the abandonment, or the moderation of

ambitious thoughts, especially in such a country as ours, where

some boon is held out to tempt these aspirings in almost every

condition, from the mansion to the cabin. It may not be amiss

for men, who are themselves aspirants, and to whom the access to

distinction and power is easy, and the attainment probable, to

declaim against the tendency of these maxims. I know well, that

in every rank and position, the inculcation of aspiring thoughts,

emulation and rivalry is the first and last lesson, the grand

and beaten precept, upon which the million are acting. I am well

aware how many hearts are wrung by all the fierce and tormenting

passions, associated with this devouring one. I affirm nothing in

regard to my own interior views, respecting what the world calls

fame, glory and immortality. Those who are most dear to me, will

not understand me to be entering my _caveat_ to dissuade them from

this _last infirmity of noble minds_. Could I do it with more

eloquence than ever yet flowed from tongue or pen, there will

always be a hundred envious competitors for every single niche

in the temple of fame. It can be occupied but by one; and he who

gains it will exult in his elevation only during its freshness

and novelty. The rest, to the torment of fostered and devouring

desires, will add the bitterness of disappointment.

The Art of Being Happy In a Series of Letters from a Father to His Children: with Observations and Comments · 第 13 / 23 段