The most material advantages of the plan here proposed are, ease,

expedition, and cheapness; yet the men so raised get a much larger

bounty than is any where at present given; because all the expenses,

extravagance, and consequent idleness of recruiting are saved or

prevented. The country incurs no new debt nor interest thereon; the

whole matter being all settled at once and entirely done with. It is

a subscription answering all the purposes of a tax, without either the

charge or trouble of collecting. The men are ready for the field with

the greatest possible expedition, because it becomes the duty of the

inhabitants themselves, in every part of the country, to find their

proportion of men instead of leaving it to a recruiting sergeant, who,

be he ever so industrious, cannot know always where to apply.

I do not propose this as a regular digested plan, neither will the

limits of this paper admit of any further remarks upon it. I believe it

to be a hint capable of much improvement, and as such submit it to the

public.

COMMON SENSE.

LANCASTER, March 21, 1778.

THE CRISIS VI. (TO THE EARL OF CARLISLE AND GENERAL CLINTON)

TO THE EARL OF CARLISLE, GENERAL CLINTON, AND

WILLIAM EDEN, ESQ., BRITISH COMMISSIONERS

AT NEW YORK.

THERE is a dignity in the warm passions of a Whig, which is never to be

found in the cold malice of a Tory. In the one nature is only heated--in

the other she is poisoned. The instant the former has it in his power to

punish, he feels a disposition to forgive; but the canine venom of the

latter knows no relief but revenge. This general distinction will, I

believe, apply in all cases, and suits as well the meridian of England

as America.

As I presume your last proclamation will undergo the strictures of other

pens, I shall confine my remarks to only a few parts thereof. All that

you have said might have been comprised in half the compass. It is

tedious and unmeaning, and only a repetition of your former follies,

with here and there an offensive aggravation. Your cargo of pardons will

have no market. It is unfashionable to look at them--even speculation

is at an end. They have become a perfect drug, and no way calculated for

the climate.

In the course of your proclamation you say, "The policy as well as the

benevolence of Great Britain have thus far checked the extremes of war,

when they tended to distress a people still considered as their fellow

subjects, and to desolate a country shortly to become again a source of

mutual advantage." What you mean by "the benevolence of Great Britain"

is to me inconceivable. To put a plain question; do you consider

yourselves men or devils? For until this point is settled, no

determinate sense can be put upon the expression. You have already

equalled and in many cases excelled, the savages of either Indies; and

if you have yet a cruelty in store you must have imported it, unmixed

with every human material, from the original warehouse of hell.

To the interposition of Providence, and her blessings on our endeavors,

and not to British benevolence are we indebted for the short chain that

limits your ravages. Remember you do not, at this time, command a foot

of land on the continent of America. Staten Island, York Island, a small

part of Long Island, and Rhode Island, circumscribe your power; and even

those you hold at the expense of the West Indies. To avoid a defeat, or

prevent a desertion of your troops, you have taken up your quarters in

holes and corners of inaccessible security; and in order to conceal what

every one can perceive, you now endeavor to impose your weakness upon

us for an act of mercy. If you think to succeed by such shadowy devices,

you are but infants in the political world; you have the A, B, C, of

stratagem yet to learn, and are wholly ignorant of the people you have

to contend with. Like men in a state of intoxication, you forget that

the rest of the world have eyes, and that the same stupidity which

conceals you from yourselves exposes you to their satire and contempt.

The paragraph which I have quoted, stands as an introduction to the

following: "But when that country [America] professes the unnatural

design, not only of estranging herself from us, but of mortgaging

herself and her resources to our enemies, the whole contest is changed:

and the question is how far Great Britain may, by every means in her

power, destroy or render useless, a connection contrived for her ruin,

and the aggrandizement of France. Under such circumstances, the laws

of self-preservation must direct the conduct of Britain, and, if the

British colonies are to become an accession to France, will direct her

to render that accession of as little avail as possible to her enemy."

I consider you in this declaration, like madmen biting in the hour of

death. It contains likewise a fraudulent meanness; for, in order to

justify a barbarous conclusion, you have advanced a false position. The

treaty we have formed with France is open, noble, and generous. It is

true policy, founded on sound philosophy, and neither a surrender

or mortgage, as you would scandalously insinuate. I have seen every

article, and speak from positive knowledge. In France, we have found an

affectionate friend and faithful ally; in Britain, we have found nothing

but tyranny, cruelty, and infidelity.

But the happiness is, that the mischief you threaten, is not in your

power to execute; and if it were, the punishment would return upon you

in a ten-fold degree. The humanity of America has hitherto restrained

her from acts of retaliation, and the affection she retains for

many individuals in England, who have fed, clothed and comforted her

prisoners, has, to the present day, warded off her resentment, and

operated as a screen to the whole. But even these considerations

must cease, when national objects interfere and oppose them. Repeated

aggravations will provoke a retort, and policy justify the measure. We

mean now to take you seriously up upon your own ground and principle,

and as you do, so shall you be done by.

You ought to know, gentlemen, that England and Scotland, are far more

exposed to incendiary desolation than America, in her present state, can

possibly be. We occupy a country, with but few towns, and whose riches

consist in land and annual produce. The two last can suffer but little,

and that only within a very limited compass. In Britain it is otherwise.

Her wealth lies chiefly in cities and large towns, the depositories

of manufactures and fleets of merchantmen. There is not a nobleman's

country seat but may be laid in ashes by a single person. Your own

may probably contribute to the proof: in short, there is no evil which

cannot be returned when you come to incendiary mischief. The ships in

the Thames, may certainly be as easily set on fire, as the temporary

bridge was a few years ago; yet of that affair no discovery was ever

made; and the loss you would sustain by such an event, executed at a

proper season, is infinitely greater than any you can inflict. The East

India House and the Bank, neither are nor can be secure from this sort

of destruction, and, as Dr. Price justly observes, a fire at the latter

would bankrupt the nation. It has never been the custom of France and

England when at war, to make those havocs on each other, because the

ease with which they could retaliate rendered it as impolitic as if each

had destroyed his own.

But think not, gentlemen, that our distance secures you, or our

invention fails us. We can much easier accomplish such a point than any

nation in Europe. We talk the same language, dress in the same habit,

and appear with the same manners as yourselves. We can pass from

one part of England to another unsuspected; many of us are as well

acquainted with the country as you are, and should you impolitically

provoke us, you will most assuredly lament the effects of it. Mischiefs

of this kind require no army to execute them. The means are obvious, and

the opportunities unguardable. I hold up a warning to our senses, if you

have any left, and "to the unhappy people likewise, whose affairs are

committed to you."* I call not with the rancor of an enemy, but the

earnestness of a friend, on the deluded people of England, lest, between

your blunders and theirs, they sink beneath the evils contrived for us.

* General [Sir H.] Clinton's letter to Congress.

"He who lives in a glass house," says a Spanish proverb, "should never

begin throwing stones." This, gentlemen, is exactly your case, and you

must be the most ignorant of mankind, or suppose us so, not to see on

which side the balance of accounts will fall. There are many other modes

of retaliation, which, for several reasons, I choose not to mention. But

be assured of this, that the instant you put your threat into execution,

a counter-blow will follow it. If you openly profess yourselves savages,

it is high time we should treat you as such, and if nothing but distress

can recover you to reason, to punish will become an office of charity.

While your fleet lay last winter in the Delaware, I offered my service

to the Pennsylvania Navy Board then at Trenton, as one who would make

a party with them, or any four or five gentlemen, on an expedition down

the river to set fire to it, and though it was not then accepted, nor

the thing personally attempted, it is more than probable that your own

folly will provoke a much more ruinous act. Say not when mischief is

done, that you had not warning, and remember that we do not begin it,

but mean to repay it. Thus much for your savage and impolitic threat.

In another part of your proclamation you say, "But if the honors of

a military life are become the object of the Americans, let them seek

those honors under the banners of their rightful sovereign, and in

fighting the battles of the united British Empire, against our late

mutual and natural enemies." Surely! the union of absurdity with madness

was never marked in more distinguishable lines than these. Your rightful

sovereign, as you call him, may do well enough for you, who dare not

inquire into the humble capacities of the man; but we, who estimate

persons and things by their real worth, cannot suffer our judgments to

be so imposed upon; and unless it is your wish to see him exposed, it

ought to be your endeavor to keep him out of sight. The less you have

to say about him the better. We have done with him, and that ought to

be answer enough. You have been often told so. Strange! that the answer

must be so often repeated. You go a-begging with your king as with a

brat, or with some unsaleable commodity you were tired of; and though

every body tells you no, no, still you keep hawking him about. But

there is one that will have him in a little time, and as we have no

inclination to disappoint you of a customer, we bid nothing for him.

The impertinent folly of the paragraph that I have just quoted, deserves

no other notice than to be laughed at and thrown by, but the principle

on which it is founded is detestable. We are invited to submit to a man

who has attempted by every cruelty to destroy us, and to join him in

making war against France, who is already at war against him for our

support.

Can Bedlam, in concert with Lucifer, form a more mad and devilish

request? Were it possible a people could sink into such apostacy they

would deserve to be swept from the earth like the inhabitants of Sodom

and Gomorrah. The proposition is an universal affront to the rank which

man holds in the creation, and an indignity to him who placed him

there. It supposes him made up without a spark of honor, and under no

obligation to God or man.

What sort of men or Christians must you suppose the Americans to be,

who, after seeing their most humble petitions insultingly rejected;

the most grievous laws passed to distress them in every quarter; an

undeclared war let loose upon them, and Indians and negroes invited to

the slaughter; who, after seeing their kinsmen murdered, their fellow

citizens starved to death in prisons, and their houses and property

destroyed and burned; who, after the most serious appeals to heaven, the

most solemn abjuration by oath of all government connected with you, and

the most heart-felt pledges and protestations of faith to each other;

and who, after soliciting the friendship, and entering into alliances

with other nations, should at last break through all these obligations,

civil and divine, by complying with your horrid and infernal proposal.

Ought we ever after to be considered as a part of the human race? Or

ought we not rather to be blotted from the society of mankind, and

become a spectacle of misery to the world? But there is something in

corruption, which, like a jaundiced eye, transfers the color of itself

to the object it looks upon, and sees every thing stained and impure;

for unless you were capable of such conduct yourselves, you would never

have supposed such a character in us. The offer fixes your infamy. It

exhibits you as a nation without faith; with whom oaths and treaties

are considered as trifles, and the breaking them as the breaking of a

bubble. Regard to decency, or to rank, might have taught you better; or

pride inspired you, though virtue could not. There is not left a step in

the degradation of character to which you can now descend; you have put

your foot on the ground floor, and the key of the dungeon is turned upon

you.

That the invitation may want nothing of being a complete monster,

you have thought proper to finish it with an assertion which has no

foundation, either in fact or philosophy; and as Mr. Ferguson, your

secretary, is a man of letters, and has made civil society his study,

and published a treatise on that subject, I address this part to him.

In the close of the paragraph which I last quoted, France is styled the

"natural enemy" of England, and by way of lugging us into some strange

idea, she is styled "the late mutual and natural enemy" of both

countries. I deny that she ever was the natural enemy of either; and

that there does not exist in nature such a principle. The expression

is an unmeaning barbarism, and wholly unphilosophical, when applied to

beings of the same species, let their station in the creation be what

it may. We have a perfect idea of a natural enemy when we think of the

devil, because the enmity is perpetual, unalterable and unabateable. It

admits, neither of peace, truce, or treaty; consequently the warfare is

eternal, and therefore it is natural. But man with man cannot arrange

in the same opposition. Their quarrels are accidental and equivocally

created. They become friends or enemies as the change of temper, or the

cast of interest inclines them. The Creator of man did not constitute

them the natural enemy of each other. He has not made any one order of

beings so. Even wolves may quarrel, still they herd together. If any two

nations are so, then must all nations be so, otherwise it is not nature

but custom, and the offence frequently originates with the accuser.

England is as truly the natural enemy of France, as France is of

England, and perhaps more so. Separated from the rest of Europe, she

has contracted an unsocial habit of manners, and imagines in others the

jealousy she creates in herself. Never long satisfied with peace,

she supposes the discontent universal, and buoyed up with her own

importance, conceives herself the only object pointed at. The expression

has been often used, and always with a fraudulent design; for when the

idea of a natural enemy is conceived, it prevents all other inquiries,

and the real cause of the quarrel is hidden in the universality of the

conceit. Men start at the notion of a natural enemy, and ask no other

question. The cry obtains credit like the alarm of a mad dog, and is

one of those kind of tricks, which, by operating on the common passions,

secures their interest through their folly.

But we, sir, are not to be thus imposed upon. We live in a large world,

and have extended our ideas beyond the limits and prejudices of an

island. We hold out the right hand of friendship to all the universe,

and we conceive that there is a sociality in the manners of France,

which is much better disposed to peace and negotiation than that of

England, and until the latter becomes more civilized, she cannot expect

to live long at peace with any power. Her common language is vulgar

and offensive, and children suck in with their milk the rudiments of

insult--"The arm of Britain! The mighty arm of Britain! Britain that

shakes the earth to its center and its poles! The scourge of France! The

terror of the world! That governs with a nod, and pours down vengeance

like a God." This language neither makes a nation great or little; but

it shows a savageness of manners, and has a tendency to keep national

animosity alive. The entertainments of the stage are calculated to the

same end, and almost every public exhibition is tinctured with insult.

Yet England is always in dread of France,--terrified at the apprehension

of an invasion, suspicious of being outwitted in a treaty, and privately

cringing though she is publicly offending. Let her, therefore, reform

her manners and do justice, and she will find the idea of a natural

enemy to be only a phantom of her own imagination.

Little did I think, at this period of the war, to see a proclamation

which could promise you no one useful purpose whatever, and tend only

to expose you. One would think that you were just awakened from a four

years' dream, and knew nothing of what had passed in the interval.

Is this a time to be offering pardons, or renewing the long forgotten

subjects of charters and taxation? Is it worth your while, after every

force has failed you, to retreat under the shelter of argument and

persuasion? Or can you think that we, with nearly half your army

prisoners, and in alliance with France, are to be begged or threatened

into submission by a piece of paper? But as commissioners at a hundred

pounds sterling a week each, you conceive yourselves bound to do

something, and the genius of ill-fortune told you, that you must write.

For my own part, I have not put pen to paper these several months.

Convinced of our superiority by the issue of every campaign, I was

inclined to hope, that that which all the rest of the world now see,

would become visible to you, and therefore felt unwilling to ruffle your

temper by fretting you with repetitions and discoveries. There have been

intervals of hesitation in your conduct, from which it seemed a pity to

disturb you, and a charity to leave you to yourselves. You have often

stopped, as if you intended to think, but your thoughts have ever been

too early or too late.

There was a time when Britain disdained to answer, or even hear

a petition from America. That time is past and she in her turn is

petitioning our acceptance. We now stand on higher ground, and offer

her peace; and the time will come when she, perhaps in vain, will ask

it from us. The latter case is as probable as the former ever was. She

cannot refuse to acknowledge our independence with greater obstinacy

than she before refused to repeal her laws; and if America alone could

bring her to the one, united with France she will reduce her to the

other. There is something in obstinacy which differs from every other

passion; whenever it fails it never recovers, but either breaks like

iron, or crumbles sulkily away like a fractured arch. Most other

passions have their periods of fatigue and rest; their suffering and

their cure; but obstinacy has no resource, and the first wound is

mortal. You have already begun to give it up, and you will, from the

natural construction of the vice, find yourselves both obliged and

inclined to do so.

If you look back you see nothing but loss and disgrace. If you look

forward the same scene continues, and the close is an impenetrable

gloom. You may plan and execute little mischiefs, but are they worth the

expense they cost you, or will such partial evils have any effect on the

general cause? Your expedition to Egg Harbor, will be felt at a distance

like an attack upon a hen-roost, and expose you in Europe, with a sort

of childish frenzy. Is it worth while to keep an army to protect you

in writing proclamations, or to get once a year into winter quarters?

Possessing yourselves of towns is not conquest, but convenience, and

in which you will one day or other be trepanned. Your retreat from

Philadelphia, was only a timely escape, and your next expedition may be

less fortunate.

It would puzzle all the politicians in the universe to conceive what you

stay for, or why you should have stayed so long. You are prosecuting

a war in which you confess you have neither object nor hope, and that

conquest, could it be effected, would not repay the charges: in the mean

while the rest of your affairs are running to ruin, and a European war

kindling against you. In such a situation, there is neither doubt nor

difficulty; the first rudiments of reason will determine the choice, for

if peace can be procured with more advantages than even a conquest can

be obtained, he must be an idiot indeed that hesitates.

But you are probably buoyed up by a set of wretched mortals, who, having

deceived themselves, are cringing, with the duplicity of a spaniel, for

a little temporary bread. Those men will tell you just what you

please. It is their interest to amuse, in order to lengthen out their

protection. They study to keep you amongst them for that very purpose;

and in proportion as you disregard their advice, and grow callous to

their complaints, they will stretch into improbability, and season their

flattery the higher. Characters like these are to be found in every

country, and every country will despise them.

COMMON SENSE.

PHILADELPHIA, Oct. 20, 1778.

THE CRISIS VII. TO THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND.

THERE are stages in the business of serious life in which to amuse is

cruel, but to deceive is to destroy; and it is of little consequence, in

the conclusion, whether men deceive themselves, or submit, by a kind of

mutual consent, to the impositions of each other. That England has long

been under the influence of delusion or mistake, needs no other proof

than the unexpected and wretched situation that she is now involved in:

and so powerful has been the influence, that no provision was ever made

or thought of against the misfortune, because the possibility of its

happening was never conceived.

The general and successful resistance of America, the conquest of

Burgoyne, and a war in France, were treated in parliament as the dreams

of a discontented opposition, or a distempered imagination. They were

beheld as objects unworthy of a serious thought, and the bare intimation

of them afforded the ministry a triumph of laughter. Short triumph

indeed! For everything which has been predicted has happened, and all

that was promised has failed. A long series of politics so remarkably

distinguished by a succession of misfortunes, without one alleviating

turn, must certainly have something in it systematically wrong. It is

sufficient to awaken the most credulous into suspicion, and the most

obstinate into thought. Either the means in your power are insufficient,

or the measures ill planned; either the execution has been bad, or the

thing attempted impracticable; or, to speak more emphatically, either

you are not able or heaven is not willing. For, why is it that you have

not conquered us? Who, or what has prevented you? You have had every

opportunity that you could desire, and succeeded to your utmost wish in

every preparatory means. Your fleets and armies have arrived in America

without an accident. No uncommon fortune has intervened. No foreign

nation has interfered until the time which you had allotted for victory

was passed. The opposition, either in or out of parliament, neither

disconcerted your measures, retarded or diminished your force. They only

foretold your fate. Every ministerial scheme was carried with as high a

hand as if the whole nation had been unanimous. Every thing wanted was

asked for, and every thing asked for was granted.

The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 1 (1774-1779): The American Crisis · 第 8 / 18 段