The committee, therefore, it is grating to the pride of a Frenchman to

confess it, would not have known to whose hands the fate of France

might be entrusted; and the part it took, that of waiting the issue of

events in the capital, if not the most dignified, was at least the

wisest and most prudent.

The representatives of the people, on their part, far from showing

themselves docile to the advice of Wellington and of Blucher,

displayed with more energy than ever the principles and sentiments

that animated them. They collected round the tri-coloured flag; and,

though the army had laid down its weapons, they were still resolved to

contend in defence of liberty, and the independence of the nation.

On the very day when the convention of Paris was notified to them by

the government, they exposed, in a new bill of rights, the fundamental

principles of a constitution, which alone, in their opinion, could

satisfy the wishes of the public: and declared, that the prince called

to reign over them should not ascend the throne, till he had given his

sanction to this bill and taken an oath to observe it, and cause it to

be observed.

Informed almost immediately by sinister rumours, that soon they would

be no longer allowed to deliberate, they resolved, on the motion of M.

Dupont de l'Eure, solemnly to express their last will in a kind of

political testament, drawn up in the following words.

"_Declaration of the Chamber of Representatives._

"The troops of the allied powers are about to occupy the capital.

"The chamber of representatives will nevertheless continue to sit amid

the inhabitants of Paris, to which place the express will of the

people has sent its proxies.

"But, under the present serious circumstances, the chamber of

representatives owes it to itself, owes it to France and to Europe, to

make a declaration of its sentiments and principles.

"It declares, therefore, that it makes a solemn appeal to the fidelity

and patriotism of the national guard of Paris, charged with the

protection of the national representatives.

"It declares, that it reposes itself with the highest confidence on

the moral principles, honour, and magnanimity, of the allied powers,

and on their respect for the independence of the nation, positively

expressed in their manifestoes.

"It declares, that the government of France, whoever may be its head,

ought to unite in its favour the wishes of the nation, legally

expressed; and form arrangements with the other governments, in order

to become a common bond and guarantee of peace between France and

Europe.

"It declares, that a monarch cannot offer any real guarantees, if he

do not swear to the observance of a constitution, formed by the

deliberations of the national representatives, and accepted by the

people. Accordingly any government, that has no other title than the

acclamations and will of a party, or is imposed on it by force; any

government, that does not adopt the national colours, and does not

guarantee,

"The liberties of the citizens;

"Equality of rights, civil and political;

"The liberty of the press;

"Freedom of religious worship;

"The representative system;

"Free assent to levies and taxes;

"The responsibility of ministers;

"The irrevocability of sales of national property, from whatever

source originating;

"The inviolability of property;

"The abolition of titles, of the old and new hereditary nobility, and

of feudal claims;

"The abolition of all confiscation of property, the complete oblivion

of opinions and votes given up to the present day;

"The institution of the legion of honour;

"The recompenses due to the officers and soldiers;

"The succour due to their widows and children;

"The institution of a jury; the indefeasibleness of the office of

judge;

"The payment of the public debt;

"Would not ensure the tranquillity of France and of Europe.

"If the fundamental principles, announced in this declaration, should

be disregarded or violated, the representatives of the French people,

acquitting themselves this day of a sacred duty, enter their protest

beforehand, in the face of the whole world, against violence and

usurpation. They entrust they maintenance of the arrangements, which

they now proclaim, to all good Frenchmen, to all generous hearts, to

all enlightened minds, to all men jealous of liberty, and, in fine, to

future generations."

This sublime protest was considered by the assembly as a funeral

monument, erected to patriotism and fidelity. All the members arose,

and adopted it spontaneously, with shouts a thousand times repeated of

"Long live the nation! Liberty for ever!" It was resolved, that it

should be sent immediately to the chamber of peers: "It must be made

known," said M. Dupin, "that the whole of the national representation

shares the noble sentiments expressed in this declaration. It must be

made known to all worthy and reasonable men, the friends of judicious

liberty, that their wishes have found interpreters here, and that

force itself cannot prevent us from uttering them."

At the same moment M. Bedoch announced, that our plenipotentiaries

were returned; and that one of them, M. Pontécoulant, had affirmed,

that "the foreign powers, and particularly the Emperor Alexander, had

shown favourable dispositions he had frequently heard it said and

repeated, that it was not the intention of the allied sovereigns, to

put any constraint on France in the choice of a government; and that

the Emperor Alexander would be at Nancy in a few days[90]."

[Footnote 90: The plenipotentiaries, who set out from

Laon on the 26th of June, arrived on the 1st of July at

Hagueneau, the head-quarters of the allied sovereigns.

The sovereigns did not think fit, to give them an

audience; and Count Walmoden was appointed on the part

of Austria, Count Capo d'Istria on that of Russia,

General Knesbeck on that of Prussia, to hear their

proposals. The English ambassador, Lord Stewart, having

no powers _ad hoc_, was simply invited, to be present at

the conferences.

Lord Stewart did not fail, as was foreseen in the

instructions given to the plenipotentiaries, to dispute

the legality of the existence of the chambers and of the

committee; and asked the French deputies, by what right

the nation pretended to expel their King, and choose

another sovereign. By the same right, answered M. de la

Fayette, as Great Britain had to depose James, and crown

William.

This answer stopped the mouth of the English minister.

The plenipotentiaries, warned by this question of the

disposition of the allies, exerted themselves less for

obtaining Napoleon II., than for rejecting Louis XVIII.

They declared, I am told, that France had an insuperable

aversion to this sovereign and his family; and that

there was no prince, it would not consent to adopt,

rather than return under their sway. In fine, they

hinted, that the nation might agree to take the Duke of

Orleans, or the King of Saxony, if it were impossible

for it to retain the throne for the son of Maria Louisa.

The foreign ministers, after some insignificant

discourse, politely put an end to the conference; and in

the evening the French plenipotentiaries received their

dismissal by the following note:

_Hagueneau, July the 1st._

"According to the stipulation of the treaty of

alliance, which says, that none of the contracting

parties shall treat of peace or an armistice, but

by common consent, the three courts, that find

themselves together, Austria, Russia, and Prussia,

declare, that they cannot at present enter into any

negotiation. The cabinets will assemble together,

as soon as possible.

"The three powers consider it as an essential

condition of peace, and of real tranquillity, that

Napoleon Bonaparte shall be incapable of disturbing

the repose of France, and of Europe, for the

future: and in consequence of the events, that

occurred in the month of March last, _the powers

must insist, that Napoleon Bonaparte be placed in

their custody_.

(Signed) WALMODEN.

Capo d'ISTRIA.

KNESBECK."

General Sébastiani confirmed these explanations. The chamber, feeling

its hopes revive, immediately ordered, that its declaration should be

carried to the foreign monarchs by a deputation of its members. "They

will understand our language," said M. Dupont de l'Eure, with a noble

feeling: "it is worthy of them, and of the great nation we represent."

Thus, at the very moment when the chamber was about to expire, its

dying looks were still turned with pleasing confidence toward the

foreign kings, whom the inconstancy of fortune had rendered the

arbiters of France. It appealed particularly, in all its wishes, to

that loyal and magnanimous prince, who had already preserved the

French from the calamities of conquest, and who appeared destined to

preserve it from evils still more deplorable. His name, uttered with

respect, with gratitude, issued from every mouth; it was sufficient,

to calm disquietude, allay grief, and revive hope; it seemed to be the

pledge of peace, independence, and happiness, to the nation. O

Alexander! this high esteem, this tender confidence, of a whole people

not thy own, doubt not, will be placed by posterity in the first rank

of thy claims to glory.

The committee, however, dissuaded the representatives from applying to

the sovereigns. It remonstrated to them, that the foreign powers

refused to acknowledge the legal character of the chambers, and this

step would expose them to humiliations unworthy the majesty of the

nation. The representatives, convinced of their mistake, did not

persevere: they tranquilly resumed their labours on the

constitution[91], and continued, while the despotic sword of kings

hung over their heads, stoically to discuss the imprescriptible rights

of the people.

[Footnote 91: This constitution, founded on the

additional act, differed from it only in abolishing

hereditary mobility. M. Manuel, however, who displayed

talents of the first order in this discussion, was of

opinion, that the order of nobility should not be

suppressed, being essentially necessary in a monarchy.

Had I to draw up an eulogy of the additional act, or a

charge against those who hold it in contempt, I would

only refer them to his constitution.]

The Duke of Wellington, when the convention was signed, had expressed

a desire, to confer with the Duke of Otranto on its execution. The

committee did not oppose their interview. It was a certain means of

knowing definitively what was to be depended on, with regard to the

dispositions of the allies. It was agreed, that the president of the

committee should reproduce the arguments of the letter of the 1st of

July; that he should endeavour, to keep out the Bourbons, and turn the

temporary vacancy of the throne to the advantage of the nation and of

freedom.

The Duke of Otranto, on his return, informed the committee, "that

Wellington had formally declared in favour of Louis XVIII.; and had

said, that this sovereign would make his entrance into Paris on the

8th of July.

"That General Pozzo di Borgo had repeated the same declaration in the

name of the Emperor of Russia; and had communicated to him a letter

from Prince Metternich, and from Count Nesselrode, expressing the

resolution, to acknowledge only Louis XVIII, and to admit no proposal

to the contrary." He added, "that the Duke of Wellington had conducted

him to the King: that he had gone _for his sake_ (_pour son compte_);

that he had left him ignorant of nothing with respect to the situation

of France, or to the disposition of people's minds against the return

of his family. That the King had listened to him with attention, and

with approbation that he had manifested an inclination, to add to the

charter fresh guarantees, and to remove all idea of reaction. _That,

as to the expressions in the proclamations, they would rather furnish

opportunities for clemency, than means of severity._" In fine, he

added, "that he had spoken of the tri-coloured cockade, but that all

explanation had been refused: that the opposition appeared to him, to

proceed less from the King, than from those about him, and from M. de

Talleyrand."

After this interview, the Duke of Otranto appeared to act separately

from his colleagues; and no longer made his appearance with

punctuality at their frequent meetings.

The newspapers soon made public, that he was appointed minister of

police to the King. This he had concealed from the committee. The

royalists congratulated him on this mark of favour; the patriots

loaded him with curses, considering it as the reward of his treachery.

The King's party, which had hitherto kept itself in obscurity, was

desirous of making reparation for this long and pusillanimous

inactivity by some brilliant act. It plotted the disarming of the

posts of the national guard, under favour of night; seizing the

Tuileries, dissolving the committee and the chambers, and proclaiming

Louis XVIII.

Some precautions taken by the Prince of Essling taught the

conspirators, that their designs were known: and they prudently left

the execution of them to foreign bayonets. They had not to wait long.

On the 7th of July, at five o'clock in the afternoon, several Prussian

battalions, in spite of the convention, surrounded the palace, where

the government was sitting. An officer of the staff delivered to the

committee a demand from Prince Blucher of a contribution of a hundred

millions in cash, and a hundred millions in articles for the troops.

The committee declared with firmness, that this requisition was

contrary to the convention; and that it would never consent, to make

itself an accomplice in such exactions. During this debate, the

Prussians had forced the gates of the Tuileries, and invaded the

courts and avenues of the palace. The committee being no longer free,

and not choosing to become an instrument of oppression, ceased its

functions.

Its first care was, to record by an authentic protest, _that it had

yielded only to force, and that the rights of the nation remained

intact_. The Duke of Otranto, the docile composer of the public papers

of the government, took up the pen for this purpose: but the

committee, fearing the effects this protest might have on the public

tranquillity, thought it better, to content itself with sending to the

two chambers the following message.

"Mr. President,

"Hitherto we had reason to believe, that the allied sovereigns were

not unanimous in their intentions, respecting the choice of a prince

to reign over France. Our plenipotentiaries gave us the same assurance

on their return. The ministers and generals of the allied powers,

however, declared yesterday in the conferences they held with the

president of the committee, that all the sovereigns had engaged, to

replace Louis XVIII. on the throne; and that this evening, or

to-morrow, he would make his entry into the capital.

"The foreign troops are come to occupy the Tuileries, where the

government sits. In this state of things, we can do nothing, but put

up prayers for our country; and, our deliberations being no longer

free, we think it our duty to separate."

This message, the last testimonial of the audacious duplicity of the

Duke of Otranto, now become a minister of the King, contained in

addition what follows. "Fresh guarantees will be added to the charter;

and we have not lost the hope of retaining the colours so dear to the

nation:" but this paragraph, of which I give only the substance, was

afterwards suppressed.

The chamber of peers, which had received with coldness the bill of

rights, and the declaration of the chamber of representatives,

separated without a murmur[92].

[Footnote 92: This chamber, after the abdication of

Napoleon, was merely a superfetation. The departure of

those peers, who formed part of the army, completed its

reduction to an absolute nullity. Without patriotism,

without energy, it confined itself to sanctioning with

an ill grace the measures adopted by the

representatives. M. Thibaudeau, M. de Ségur, M. de

Bassano, and a few others, alone raised themselves to a

level with the state of affairs. M. Thibaudeau in

particular distinguished himself, on the 28th of June

and the 2d of July, by two speeches on our political

situation; which were considered then, as they long will

be, as noble specimens of courage, patriotism, and

eloquence.]

The chamber of deputies received its sentence of death with heroic

tranquillity. When M. Manuel, repeating the memorable words of

Mirabeau, exclaimed: "We are here by the will of the people; we will

not depart, till compelled by the bayonet: it is our duty, to devote

to our country our last moments; and, if necessary, the last drop of

our blood:" all the members of the assembly rose, in testimony of

their assent; and declared, that they would remain firm at their

posts.

But they were not allowed, to fulfil this glorious resolution. The

president, M. Lanjuinais, betraying their courage, and despising their

will, dissolved the sitting, and retired. "M. President," said General

Solignac to him, "the muse of history is here, and will record your

conduct."

The next morning, they found the avenues of their palace occupied by

foreigners, and the doors of the assembly closed. M. de Cazes, at the

head of some royal volunteers, had taken away the keys. This act of

violence, against which they protested, at length removed the bandage

from their eyes: they perceived the error they had committed, in too

hastily removing Napoleon from the throne, and blindly entrusting to

other hands the fate of their country[93].

[Footnote 93: I repeat here a preceding observation,

that I confine myself to a relation of facts, without

deciding upon them.]

Thus terminated, after a month's existence, that assembly, which the

French had chosen, to confirm the imperial dynasty, to secure their

liberties and their tranquillity; but which, through precipitancy,

want of foresight, and an excess of zeal and patriotism, had given

rise to nothing but convulsions and calamities.

The dissolution of the chambers, and of the government, put an end to

all illusions.

The tri-coloured flags, that had been retained, disappeared.

The shouts of "Long live the nation!" and "Liberty for ever!" ceased.

M. Fouché went to announce to his new master, that the whole was

consummated.

And on the 8th of July Louis XVIII. in triumph took possession of his

capital[94], and of his throne.

[Footnote 94: On the 8th of July M. de Vitrolles caused

the following official article to be inserted in the

Moniteur.

"Paris, July the _7th_.--The committee of

government made known to the King, by the mouth of

its president, that it had just dissolved itself."

This article, written with the intention, to make

France and Europe believe, that the committee had

voluntarily deposited its authority in the hands of

the King, called forth strong remonstrances from

the Duke of Vicenza. Incapable of paltering with

his duty, or with the truth, he went immediately to

the King's minister, the Duke of Otranto;

reproached him severely with having compromised the

committee and declared, that he would not quit his

house, till he had obtained a formal disavowal of

it. The minister protested, that the article was

not written by him; and consented to disavow it.

Count Carnot, Baron Quinette, and General Grenier,

having joined the Duke of Vicenza, the latter

wrote, in the Duke of Otranto's closet, the letter

subjoined; the boldness and firmness of which, I

trust, it is unnecessary to remark.

"Monsieur le Duc.--As the committee of government,

on its retiring, neither ought nor could charge

your excellency with any mission, we desire you, to

cause the article inserted in the Moniteur of this

day, the 8th of July, to be disavowed; and to

procure the insertion of our last message to the

two chambers.

(Signed) CAULINCOURT.

CARNOT.

QUINETTE.

GRENIER."

The Duke of Otranto answered this letter by the

following declaration:

"Gentlemen.--The committee of government having

dissolved itself on the 7th of July, every act

emanating from it posterior to its message to the

chambers is null, and ought to be considered as not

having taken place.

"Your remonstrance against the article inserted in

the Moniteur of the 8th of July is just. I disavow

it, as totally unfounded, and published without my

authority.

(Signed) The Duke of OTRANTO."]

At the moment when this prince re-entered the Tuileries, Napoleon was

busied at Rochefort on the means of quitting France. His presence

excited such enthusiasm among the people, the mariners, and the

soldiers, that the shore uninterruptedly resounded with shouts of

"Long live the Emperor!" and these shouts, repeated from mouth to

mouth, could not but teach those, who had flattered themselves with

having mastered the will of Napoleon, how easy it would be for him, to

shake off his chains, and laugh at their vain precautions. But

faithful to his determination, he firmly resisted the impulse of

circumstances; and the continual solicitations made him, to put

himself at the head of the patriots and the army. "It is too late," he

incessantly repeated: "the evil is now without remedy: it is no longer

in my power, to save the country. A civil war now would answer no

end, would be of no utility. To myself alone it might prove

advantageous, by affording me the means of procuring personally more

favourable conditions: but these I must purchase by the inevitable

destruction of all that France possesses of most generous and most

magnanimous and such a result inspires me with horror[95]."

[Footnote 95: The words recorded by M. de Lascases.]

Up to the 29th of June, the day when the Emperor quitted Malmaison, no

English vessel had been seen off the coast of Rochefort, and there is

every reason to believe, that Napoleon, if circumstances had allowed

him to embark immediately after his abdication, would have reached the

United States without obstruction. But when he arrived at the

sea-coast, he found every outlet occupied by the enemy, and appeared

to retain little hope of escaping.

The 8th of July[96] he went on board the frigate la Saale, prepared to

receive him. His suite was embarked on board the Medusa; and the next

day, the 9th, the two vessels anchored at the Isle of Aix. Napoleon,

always the same, ordered the garrison under arms, examined the

fortifications most minutely, and distributed praise or blame, as if

he had still been sovereign master of the state.

[Footnote 96: At the same moment Louis XVIII. entered

Paris. It was another remarkable singularity, that the

King entered the capital the first time on the same day,

on which the Emperor went on board the brig, that

conveyed him to Porto Ferrajo.]

On the 10th, the wind, hitherto contrary, became fair; but an English

fleet of eleven vessels was cruising within sight of the port, and it

was impossible to get to sea.

On the 11th, the Emperor, weary of this state of anxiety, sent Count

de Las Cases, now become his secretary, to sound the disposition of

the English admiral; to inquire, whether he were authorised to allow

him liberty, to repair to England, or to the United States.

The admiral answered, that he had no orders: that still he was ready,

to receive Napoleon, and convey him to England: but that it was not in

his power, to answer whether he would obtain permission to remain

there, or to repair to America.

Napoleon, little satisfied with this answer, caused two half-decked

vessels to be purchased, with intention, under favour of night, to

reach a Danish smack, with which he had contrived to hold

intelligence.

This step having failed, some young midshipmen, full of courage and

devotion, proposed to him, to go on board the two barks; and swore

they would forfeit their lives, if they did not convey him to New

York. Napoleon was not deterred by so long a voyage in such slight

vessels: but he knew, that they could not avoid stopping on the coasts

of Spain and Portugal, to take in water and provision; and he would

not expose himself and people, to the danger of falling into the hands

of the Portuguese or Spaniards.

Memoirs of the Private Life, Return, and Reign of Napoleon in 1815, Vol. II · 第 20 / 21 段