This address, which perished in the birth, related to

the political situation of France with respect to the

allies. It appeared to me not very interesting, and I

thought I might dispense with a particular account of

it. It gave rise, however, to a remarkable incident. M.

Manuel, who had the principal hand in drawing it up, had

not thought proper, to speak of the Emperor's successor

in it; and the chamber decided, to add in the address,

that Napoleon II. had been called to the empire.]

"Plenipotentiaries have been sent to the allied powers ... the success

of the negotiations depends on you. Close round the tri-coloured flag,

consecrated by glory and the wishes of the nation. You will see us, if

necessary, in your ranks; and we will convince the world, that

twenty-five years of glory and sacrifices will never be effaced, and

that a people, who wills to be free, must ever remain so."

The attitude of the chamber and of the government did not remove the

apprehensions of the Prince of Eckmuhl. He returned to the charge; and

wrote to the president of the committee, in the night of the 29th,

"that he had vanquished his prejudices and opinions, and found, that

no means of safety existed but in concluding an armistice, and

immediately proclaiming Louis XVIII."

The president answered him:

"I am as well persuaded as you, M. marshal, that nothing better can be

done, than to treat with promptitude of an armistice: but we must

know, what the enemy wants. An injudicious conduct would produce three

evils:

"1st, That of having acknowledged Louis XVIII. previous to any

engagement on his side:

"2d, That of being equally compelled, to admit the enemy into Paris:

"3d, That of obtaining no conditions from Louis XVIII.

"I take upon myself, to authorize you, to send to the advanced posts

of the enemy, and to conclude an armistice, making every sacrifice,

that is compatible with our duties, and with our dignity. It is better

to give up fortified towns, than to sacrifice Paris."

The Duke of Otranto having laid this letter before the committee, it

thought, that the answer of its president _decided implicitly the

question of the recall of Louis XVIII._, and allowed the Prince of

Eckmuhl too great latitude. It made him write immediately a

supplementary letter, saying: "It is unnecessary to remind you, M.

marshal, that your armistice must be purely military, and must contain

no political question. It would be proper, that this demand of an

armistice should be made by a general of the line, and a major-general

of the national guard."

Thus in the space of the twenty-four hours, that preceded and followed

the Emperor's departure, the committee had to repel, and did repel,

the instigations more or less culpable of the minister at war, the

general in chief of the army, and the president of the government[81].

[Footnote 81: The reader will be aware, that I reason

here, as well as every where else, on the principles of

the mandate given to the committee.]

The army, however, had arrived step by step at the gates of Paris.

Marshal Grouchy, dissatisfied and disconcerted, gave in his

resignation on the score of his health.

The Prince of Eckmuhl, who, by an air of sincerity, and reiterated

protestations of devotion and fidelity, had regained, thanks to the

Duke of Otranto, the confidence of the majority of the members of the

committee, was invested with the command in chief of the army.

On the 30th of June a message informed the chambers, that the enemies

were within sight of the capital; that the army, re-organized,

occupied a line of defence, by which Paris was protected; that it was

animated with the best disposition; and that its devotion equalled its

valour.

Deputations from the two chambers immediately set out, to carry to the

defenders of their country the expression of the principles, the

sentiments, and the hopes of the national representation. Their

patriotic language, their tri-coloured scarfs, and the name of

Napoleon II., which they took care to employ, electrified the

soldiery; and completely restored to them that confidence in

themselves, and that resolution to conquer or die, which are the

infallible presages of victory.

The moment for marching to battle was propitious. The Prince of

Eckmuhl solicited peace.

The Duke of Albuféra had just concluded an armistice with Marshal

Frimont, commander of the Austrian forces. The prince informed the

Duke of Wellington of it; and demanded of him, to cause a cessation of

hostilities, _till a decision of congress should take place_. "If I

appear on the field of battle with the idea of your talents," he

added, "I shall carry with me the conviction, that I am fighting for

the most sacred of causes, that of the defence and independence of my

country; and, whatever may be the result, my lord, I will merit your

esteem."

If, instead of holding a language more suitable to a man half

vanquished, than to a French general accustomed to conquer, another

chief, differently inspired, had declared with noble firmness, that he

was ready, if a stop were not put to unjust aggressions, to give to

his eighty thousand brave soldiers the signal of victory or death; the

enemy would unquestionably have desisted from pursuing a war, now

become without object, without utility, and without glory. But the

Duke of Wellington, faithfully informed of the true state of things,

knew that the Prince of Eckmuhl, satisfied with having surmounted his

prejudices and opinions, appeared more disposed to neutralize the

courage of his troops, than to put it to the proof; and Wellington

refused the suspension of hostilities proposed. It entered into the

policy of the princes, who had taken up arms for legitimacy, to compel

us to receive Louis XVIII. _cap in hand_: and the consequence of this

was, that the allied generals avoided treating; as the sentiments of

the president of the committee, and of the general of the French army,

fully satisfied them, that they might wait without any risk, till

circumstances or treachery compelled us, to submit to the law of

necessity.

Wellington had rejected the proposal of Marshal Davoust, under the

frivolous pretence, that the Emperor had resumed the command of the

army. It is naturally to be presumed, that the committee had not

neglected, to give the commissioners immediate information of the

departure of Napoleon, and of the circumstances, that had preceded it.

But it had hitherto received no communication from them. Their

correspondence, intentionally fettered by the allies, had been farther

prevented by our advanced posts; who, considering the persons

appointed to hold a parley as machinators of treason, stopped their

way with their muskets. The committee resolved, therefore, to obtain

news of them at any price: and, on the recommendation of the Duke of

Otranto, it despatched to them M. de Tromeling. It was not ignorant,

that this emigrant officer, a Vendean, and long detained in the Temple

as the companion of Sir Sidney Smith and Captain Wright, little

merited the confidence of the patriots. But the double-faced agents of

M. Fouché alone could open the enemy's lines; and it was obliged, in

spite of itself, to make use of them.

M. de Tromeling set out. Instead of delivering his despatches to the

commissioners, he was afraid of their being taken from him by the

enemy, and he destroyed them. The committee thought, that he had

rather deceived himself by his cunning; but it readily excused this

error, to attend wholly to the news he had brought.

Our commissioners arrived at the English head-quarters on the 28th,

and were eager to solicit a suspension of arms.

Lord Wellington informed them, that he wished to consult with Prince

Blucher on this point; and on the 29th of June, at half after eleven

in the evening, he sent them the following answer.

Head quarters of Prince Blucher,

June the 29th, 1815, 11-1/2 at night.

"Gentlemen,

"I have the honour to acquaint you, that having consulted Marshal

Prince Blucher on your proposal for an armistice, his highness has

agreed with me, that, under present circumstances, no armistice can

take place, while Napoleon Bonaparte is in Paris, and at _liberty_;

and that the operations are in such a state, that he cannot stop them.

"I have the honour, &c.

"WELLINGTON."

On the 1st of July in the morning, they had a conference, of which

they gave an account to the government by the following despatch,

addressed to Baron Bignon, secretary of state, assistant to the

minister of foreign affairs.

"Louvres, July the 1st, 1815, forenoon.

"Monsieur le Baron,

"The despatches, Nos. 1, 2, and 3, which we have had the honour to

address to you, remain unanswered[82]. We are absolutely deprived of

the knowledge of what is passing at Paris, and in the rest of France.

To whatever cause this want of communication is to be ascribed, it

renders our situation painful, and is detrimental to the activity of

our proceedings. It may render them useless: we request you, to remedy

this as speedily as possible.

[Footnote 82: As these despatches are now uninteresting,

I have not inserted them.]

"At present we are authorized to think, that, as soon as you have made

known, that Napoleon Bonaparte is at a distance, a suspension of

hostilities for three days may be signed, in order to adjust an

armistice, during which a treaty for peace may take place.

"Directed by the instructions given us, to listen to what may be said

to us, and make you acquainted with it, we have to inform you, the

Duke of Wellington has repeated to us several times, that as soon as

our government has a head, peace will speedily be concluded.

"Speaking, as he says, merely as a private individual, but supposing

however, that his opinion may be taken into consideration, he more

than objects to the government of Napoleon II.; and thinks, that,

under such a reign, Europe could enjoy no security, and France no

repose.

"They say, that they do not pretend to oppose the choice of any other

head to the government. They repeat on every occasion, that the powers

of Europe do not pretend, to interfere in this choice: but they add,

that, if the prince chosen were such, as by the nature of his

situation to excite apprehensions for the tranquillity of Europe, by

rendering that of France problematical, it would be necessary for the

allied powers to have guarantees; and we have reason to believe, that

these guarantees would be cessions of territory.

"One person alone, Louis XVIII. seems to unite all the conditions,

that could prevent Europe from demanding guarantees for its security.

"Already, they say, he resides at Cambray. Quesney has opened its

gates to him. These places, and other towns, are in his power; either

by having delivered themselves up, or having been put into his hands

by the allies.

"The Duke of Wellington admits and enumerates a considerable part of

the faults committed by Louis XVIII. during his government of a few

months. He puts in the first rank his having given to the princes of

his family entrance into his council; his having had a ministry

without union, and without responsibility; his having created a

military household, not chosen from the soldiers of the army; and his

not having placed about him persons, who were truly interested in the

maintenance of the charter.

"It seems to him, that, by making known our grievances, _without

settling conditions_, engagements might be formed with the public,

which would remove its apprehensions for the future, by giving France

the guarantee, it might desire.

"If a discussion of conditions take place, others beside the actual

authorities might deliberate, resumed the Duke.

"If any time be lost, generals of other armies might interfere in the

negotiations; and they would be rendered more complicated by

additional interests.

"We add two proclamations of Louis XVIII. &c.

(Signed) "ANDRÉOSSY,

"Count BOISSY D'ANGLAS,

"FLAUGERGUES,

"VALENCE,

"LABESNARDIER."

M. Bignon's despatch, announcing the departure of Napoleon, having

reached them after the conclusion of this first conference, they

hastened to communicate it to Lord Wellington; and to claim a

suspension of hostilities, in order to conclude an armistice, to which

the presence of Napoleon had hitherto been the only obstacle.

Lord Wellington answered them: "that it was necessary for him, to

confer with Prince Blucher, and that he would give them an answer in

the course of the day."

In the evening they had a fresh conference with this general, which

gave occasion to the following despatch:

"Louvres, July the 1st, half after 8 in the evening.

"Lord Wellington has communicated to us a letter from Manheim, written

in the names of the Emperors of Russia and Austria by MM. de

Nesselrode and de Metternich. This letter strongly urged the

continuance of operations; and declares, that, if any armistice be

entered into by the generals, who are at this moment near Paris, their

majesties will not consider it as putting any stop to their march, but

will order their troops, to approach Paris.

"The Count d'Artois has just arrived at the head-quarters of the Duke

of Wellington, who received us alone in his saloon. We did not

perceive the prince; he was in a separate apartment.

"We insisted on the execution of the promise given us. The Duke of

Wellington answered, that he had always declared to us, he could enter

into no definitive engagements, till he had conferred with Marshal

Prince Blucher; to whom he would go, to prevail on him to join with

him in agreeing on an armistice.

"He added, he would not conceal from us, that the Field Marshal had an

extreme aversion to every thing, that would stay his operations, which

extended already to the left bank of the Seine; and that he could not

avoid supporting his movements, if he could not bring him to agree in

his opinion.

"He communicated to us a proposal for an armistice, made by the Prince

of Eckmuhl, which he had just received.

"He assured us, that, as soon as he had seen Prince Blucher, he would

return, and join us at Louvres; and sent to request us, to repair to

Gonesse.

"In talking on the possible conditions of an armistice, he insinuated,

that he should require the army to quit Paris; which we declined,

objecting, that on the contrary it was proper for the army of the

allies, to take remote positions; otherwise it would be impossible, to

deliberate freely on the important interests of our country, the

influence of which on those of Europe he appeared to acknowledge.

"The conference thus terminating, we have some reason to think, that

Lord Wellington will give the Count d'Artois to understand, that he

ought to remain at a much more considerable distance from Paris."

To this Baron Bignon immediately sent the following answer:

"_To Messieurs the Commissioners charged with the Armistice._

July the 1st.

"You announced to us, gentlemen, that you were authorized to believe,

that, if Napoleon Bonaparte were away, a suspension of hostilities

might be signed, during which a treaty for peace might be entered

into. _The desired condition being fulfilled_, there is at the present

moment no motive, that can oppose a suspension of hostilities, and an

armistice. It is strongly to be desired, that the suspension of

hostilities, instead of being for three days only, should be at least

for five.

"We do not think, that the English and Prussians alone will attempt to

force our lines. It would be gratuitously incurring useless losses.

According to their own account, they can be joined by the Bavarians

only in the first fortnight of this month: so that it may be

convenient to them to wait for this reinforcement, which is an

additional reason for their not refusing an armistice, that will be

attended with as much or more advantage to themselves than to us. In

fine, if the allies do not choose, to forget altogether their solemn

declarations, what do they now require? The only obstacle, that,

according to them, opposed the conclusion of peace, is irrevocably

removed: thus nothing any longer opposes its re-establishment; and, to

arrive at peace, nothing is more urgent than an armistice.

"The committee of government has had laid before it all the

particulars, that you have transmitted, of the language held to you by

the Duke of Wellington. It desires, gentlemen, that you will persist

in distinguishing the political question of the form of government of

France from the actual question, the conclusion of an armistice.

Without repelling any of the overtures made you, it is easy, to give

the Duke of Wellington to understand, that, if, in the present state

of affairs, the political question of the government of France _must

inevitably become the subject of a sort of discussion between France

and the allied powers_, the general interest of France, and of the

powers themselves, is to do nothing precipitately; and not to decide

on a definitive part, till after having maturely weighed what will

offer real guarantees for the future. It is possible, that the allied

powers themselves, when better informed of the sentiments of the

French nation, will not persevere in the resolutions they may have

formed from different data. Napoleon is no longer at Paris, and has

not been for nearly a week. His political career is at an end. If any

national disposition in favour of the Bourbons existed, this

disposition would have been loudly manifested, and their recall would

have been already consummated. It is evident, therefore, that the

re-establishment of this family is not the will of the nation. It

remains for the allied sovereigns to examine, whether, in wishing to

impose it on the nation in despite of its will, they do not themselves

act contrary to their own intentions; since, instead of securing the

internal peace of France, they would only be sowing in it the seeds of

fresh discord.

"The proclamations of Louis XVIII. are known here: and the nature of

these proclamations already destroys all the hopes, that the language

of the Duke of Wellington might give. It may be judged from the spirit

that breathes in these pieces recently published, that the present

royal ministry either could not, or would not prevent, what the French

nation might expect from that government.

"For the rest, gentlemen, you should confine yourselves to hearing

every thing: you ought to affirm, that France itself desires nothing,

but what will be of the greatest benefit to the general interest: and

that, if it would prefer any plan to the re-establishment of the

Bourbons, it is because there is none, that offers it so many

inconveniences, and so few advantages.

"You must strongly repeat, gentlemen, to the Duke of Wellington and

Prince Blucher, that, if the French government warmly insist on an

armistice, it is because it perceives the possibility of coming to a

good understanding on points, on which opinions appear to be farthest

divided. It is because the communications and connexions, established

between their head-quarters and us, enable us thoroughly to appreciate

the true spirit of France. We think in particular, that the nobleness

of the Duke of Wellington's character, and the wisdom of the allied

sovereigns, cannot lead them to a desire, to force the French nation

to submit to a government, that is repugnant to the real wishes of the

great majority of the population."

This language, so remarkable for its moderation, was corroborated by

the _ostensible_ letter below, which the Duke of Otranto thought

proper to address to each of the generals in chief of the besieging

armies.

"My Lord (or Prince),

"Independently of the course of our negotiations, I make it my duty,

to write personally to your lordship on the subject of an armistice,

the refusal of which, I confess, seems to me inexplicable. Our

plenipotentiaries have been at head-quarters ever since the 28th of

June, and we have not yet a positive answer.

"Peace already exists, since the war has no longer an object. Our

right to independence, and the engagement taken by the sovereigns to

respect it, would not the less subsist after the taking of Paris. It

would be inhuman, therefore, it would be atrocious, to engage in

sanguinary battles, that would make no alteration in the questions to

be decided.

"I must speak candidly to your lordship; our state of possession, our

legal state, _which has the double sanction of the people and of the

chambers, is that of a government, where the grandson of the Emperor

of Austria is the head of the state. We cannot think of altering this

state of things, unless the nation acquires a certainty, that the

powers revoke their promises, and that the preservation of our present

government is in opposition to their common wishes_.

"What then can be more just, than to conclude an armistice? Are there

any other means of allowing the combined powers time to explain

themselves, and France time to be acquainted with their wishes?

"It will not escape your lordship, that already one great power finds

in our state of possession a personal right to interest itself in our

interior concerns. As long as this state remains unaltered, the two

chambers have hence an additional obligation, not to consent at

present to any measure capable of altering our possession.

"Is not the step, that has been adopted on our eastern frontier, the

most natural to follow? It was not confined to an armistice between

General Bubna and Marshal Suchet: it was stipulated, that we should

return to our limits according to the treaty of Paris; because, in

fact, the war ought to be considered as ended by the simple fact of

the abdication of Napoleon.

"Field-marshal Frimont, on his part, has agreed to the armistice, to

meet by preliminary arrangements those, that may take place between

the allies. We do not even know, whether England and Prussia have

changed their minds on the subject of our independence; for the march

of the armies cannot be any certain indication of the minds of the

cabinets. Neither can the will of two powers suffice us; it is their

general agreement we want to know. Would you anticipate this

agreement? Would you oppose an obstacle to it, in order to give rise

to a new political tempest from a state of things so near to peace?

"I am not afraid, for my own part, to anticipate all objections.

Perhaps you suppose, that the occupation of Paris by two of the allied

armies will second the views you may entertain of restoring Louis

XVIII. to the throne. But can an augmentation of the evils of war,

which can be ascribed to this motive alone, be a means of

reconciliation?

"I must declare to your lordship, that every sinister attempt to

impose on us a government, before the allied powers have explained

themselves, would immediately oblige the chambers to take measures,

that would not leave the possibility of a reconciliation in any case.

It is even the interest of the King, that every thing should remain in

a state of suspension: force may replace him on the throne, but cannot

keep him there. It is neither by force, nor by surprise, nor by the

wishes of one party, that the national will can be brought to change

its government. It would even be in vain, at the present moment, to

offer us conditions, to render a new government more supportable.

There are no conditions that can be examined, as long as the necessity

of bending our necks to the yoke, of renouncing our independence, is

not proved to us. Now, my lord, this necessity cannot even be

suspected, before the allied powers are in accord. None of their

engagements have been revoked: our independence is under their

protection: it is we, who enter into their views; and, according to

the sense of their declaration, it is the besieging armies, that

deviate from them.

Memoirs of the Private Life, Return, and Reign of Napoleon in 1815, Vol. II · 第 17 / 21 段