REFUTATION OF THE STOICS.

We now pass to the opinions of (Zeno and the other Stoic)

philosophers,[61] who assert that two bodies which make up a mixture

mutually interpenetrate each other totally. They support this view

by observing that when the bodies interpenetrate totally, they are

divided without the occurrence of a continuous division (which would

make their molecules lose their magnitude). Indeed, perspiration

issues from the human body without its being divided or riddled with

holes. To this it may be objected that nature may have endowed our

body with a disposition to permit perspiration to issue easily. To

this (the Stoics) answer that certain substances (like ivory[62]),

which when worked into thin sheets, admit, in all their parts, a liquid

(oat-gruel) which passes from one surface to the other. As these

substances are bodies, it is not easy to understand how one element

can penetrate into another without separating its molecules. On the

other hand, total division must imply mutual destruction (because

their molecules would lose all magnitude whatever). When, however, two

mingled bodies do not together occupy more space than either of them

separately (the Stoics) seem forced to admit to their adversaries that

this phenomenon is caused by the displacement of air.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 3 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 66 / 442 题