REFUTATION OF ARISTOTLE AND ALEXANDER OF APHRODISIAS.

As to the (Peripatetic) philosophers who assert that in a mixture only

the qualities mingle, while the material extension of both bodies are

only in juxtaposition, so long as the qualities proper to each of

them are spread throughout the whole mass, they seem to establish the

rightness of their opinion by attacking the doctrine which asserts that

the two bodies mutually interpenetrate in mixture.[60] (They object)

that the molecules of both bodies will finally lose all magnitude

by this continuous division which will leave no interval between the

parts of either of the two bodies; for if the two bodies mutually

interpenetrate each other in every part, their division must become

continuous. Besides, the mixture often occupies an extent greater than

each body taken separately, and as great as if mere juxtaposition

had occurred. Now if two bodies mutually interpenetrate totally, the

resulting mixture would occupy no more place than any one of them

taken separately. The case where two bodies occupy no more space than

a single one of them is by these philosophers explained by the air's

expulsion, which permits one of the bodies to penetrate into the

pores of the other. Besides, in the case of the mixture of two bodies

of unequal extent, how could the body of the smaller extend itself

sufficiently to spread into all the parts of the greater? There are

many other such reasons.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 3 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 65 / 442 题