New methods of holding the pen are as constant in this form as in the

spastic, as it is as necessary in one as in the other to avoid as much

as possible the use of the affected muscles. A carpet-weaver, seen by

myself, was obliged to tie the knots in the warp on the distal

extremity of the second phalanx of the thumb, as the extensor secundi

internodii pollicis was partially paralyzed, so that he was unable to

keep the distal phalanx extended. This condition came on when he was a

compositor, and compelled him to change his trade. A condition of

spasm had preceded the paralysis.

The first dorsal interosseus muscle is frequently the seat of paresis;

this is readily discovered by measuring the power which the patient

has of lateral movement of the index finger and comparing it with that

of the sound hand.

III. Tremor (Tremulous Form).—Trembling or unsteadiness of the fingers

is occasionally seen, usually most marked in the fore finger when the

hand is at rest with the fingers slightly separated. In some cases

this may be sufficient to cause unsteadiness in work, prolonged work

and over-fatigue being most apt to produce it; as previously

mentioned, this is one of the premonitory symptoms of professional

muscular atrophy. {519} An oscillatory trembling, due to implication

of the supinators and pronator, is described by Cazenave,[40] which

interfered greatly with the act of writing. Tremor is of itself rarely

complained of by those affected with copodyscinesia, unless it becomes

sufficiently marked to cause interference with work.

[Footnote 40: “Observations de Tremblements oscillatoires de la Main

Droite,” _Gaz. méd. de Paris_, 1872, pp. 212-215.]

A peculiar form of nystagmus occasionally seen in miners may be

considered as belonging to this category. According to Nieden of

Bochum[41] it is caused by eye-strain in the defective illumination of

the mines, and consists not of a spasm, but of a defective

innervation, like the tremor of old persons. C. B. Taylor[42] of

Nottingham and Simeon Snell[43] also speak of this as a fatigue

disease.

[Footnote 41: “The Pathogenesis and Etiology of Nystagmus of Miners,”

_Am. Journ. Med. Sci._, Oct., 1881.]

[Footnote 42: Quoted by Poore, _loc. cit._]

[Footnote 43: “Miners' Nystagmus,” _Brit. Med. Journ._, vol. ii.,

1884, p. 121.]

IV. Pain, or Some Modification of Normal Sensation.—Every case of

copodyscinesia, without exception, has at one period or another of the

disease some modification of normal sensation in the hand or arm.

Usually the very first symptom that attracts the patient's attention

is a sense of fatigue or tire in the hand or arm, which at first

appears only after a considerable amount of work; if rest is taken

now, the part regains its normal condition, but if the work is

continued the sensation increases, and the amount of labor necessary

to cause the disability gradually grows less and less until any

attempt suffices to produce it. A painful sensation or a sense of heat

may be experienced in the shoulders or in the cervical or upper dorsal

spine at the time the foregoing symptoms are felt.

These symptoms are due to chronic fatigue in many instances, this

being an important factor in the causation of these troubles. An

expression frequently used by those affected is that the hand or arm

becomes lame; this sense of tire may be slight or may be of an intense

aching character, almost unendurable.

Should spasm supervene, then there will be a sense of tension and pain

in the rigid bellies of the muscles. When a subacute neuritis is

present, as frequently occurs, all the symptoms common to that

condition appear—viz. pain over the various nerve-trunks and at the

points of emergence of their branches, either spontaneous or only

solicited on pressure; areas of hyperæsthesia or anæsthesia; a sense

of itching or tingling or pricking in the arm or hand; or a sense of

numbness, causing the part to fall asleep.

As previously mentioned under Etiology, pain may be absent in some

cases of subacute neuritis. Occasionally, the distal phalanx of the

fore finger or thumb becomes exquisitely sensitive to pressure, and

there may be a burning or stinging pain under the nail, severe enough

to make the patient think local suppuration is about to take place.

Sensory disturbances in the region of the hand supplied by the radial

nerve are quite common, less so in the region supplied by the median,

and least of all in the ulnar distribution. This last having never

been seen by Poore, although, as pointed out by him, the muscles

supplied by the nerve are those most frequently implicated in this

disease when it affects scriveners, his explanation is that the deep

motor branches are {520} widely separated from the sensory branches of

the nerve, while this is not true of the radial.

One case of impaired sensation affecting the ulnar distribution, and

consisting of slight numbness of the palmar surfaces of the ring and

little fingers, has come under my observation. The patient was a young

woman affected with pianists' cramp, having as its foundation a

subacute neuritis of the musculo-spiral and ulnar nerves; the trouble

had lasted five years.

A curious form of pain, as of a bar thrust diagonally through the

hand, has been complained of; again, the arm, hand, or fingers may be

the seat of a subjective sensation of weight, so that one arm will

feel very much heavier than its fellow, or the hand may feel as heavy

as lead. A soreness and sense of tightness, as of a band around the

wrist, a throbbing and pulsation, or a tense feeling as if the skin

would burst when the hand was closed, have been noticed occasionally.

V. Vaso-motor and Trophic Disturbances.—Among the rarer symptoms seen

are vaso-motor and nutritional changes; these never occur alone, but

are accompanied by cramp and fatigue or by some evidence of

nerve-lesion.

When a patient with this symptom attempts to perform the task which

produces the disability, in addition to the fatigue, spasm, or pain

the veins on the back of the hand and fingers will be seen to slowly

enlarge; this may gradually increase until it extends over the whole

arm, the parts becoming more or less turgid with blood, the

temperature at the same time being somewhat increased. A marked

sensation of throbbing accompanies these symptoms.

Other parts more distant may become affected, the face becoming

flushed, palpitation of the heart and profuse perspiration, either

local or more or less general, ensuing, followed by exhaustion.

When there is a marked hyperæsthesia of the distal phalanges of the

fingers, there may be a glossy appearance of the skin, or the parts

may appear inflamed and as if about to suppurate, or there may be

chilblains. A rare symptom is change in the character of the nails,

which become brittle and crack off like shell, either spontaneously or

when an attempt is made to cut them.

GENERAL SYMPTOMS.—Besides the various symptoms above enumerated, there

may be others more general in character, such as intense headache and

great general nervousness, the emotional character being generally

well marked, as is shown by the disability being greatly increased

when the patient knows some one is watching and criticising. There may

be also vertigo and sleeplessness. When there is an associated spasm

of the analogous muscles of the other arm and hand, although there is

no apparent trouble in the arm which is being used, it shows that the

hitherto almost automatic act is losing some of its automatism: this,

although rare, is an important premonitory symptom.

A rare symptom, which, as far as my knowledge allows me to say, is

confined to telegraph operators, is an inability to mentally grasp the

proper number of dots and dashes composing certain Morse characters:

this usually coincides with the difficulty experienced in making those

characters after they have been thought of, and also makes it

difficult for them to recognize them by sound even when properly made

by another {521} person. The characters composed entirely of dots seem

to cause the most trouble in this way.

Electrical Reactions.—In those cases where spasm of one or more

muscles is a more or less marked symptom electrical examination shows,

both to the faradic and galvanic current, a quantitative increase in

the reaction, both in the nerves and muscles; with the galvanic

current the cathodal closing contraction is more marked than the

anodal closing contraction, as in health (KaSZ > AnSZ); only this

formula is most marked in the affected arm. When paresis is present

there will be a quantitative decrease in the reaction, the formula

still being KaSZ > AnSZ. In the same arm some muscles may show a

quantitative increase and others a quantitative decrease. Where there

is a neuritis present the electrical examination will show a

quantitative increase, but where the disease has advanced to

degeneration of the nerve the reaction of degeneration will be found,

and the formula will be AnSZ > KaSZ; there is, therefore, a

qualitative change, but this must be looked upon as rather uncommon in

this class of diseases.

Poore[44] is of the opinion that increased irritability shows an

early, and decreased irritability a late, stage of the same condition.

According to his tables, but very few of his 75 cases of impaired

writing-power showed this quantitative increase, while every case

showing the least evidence of cramp that has come under my observation

has shown it in one or more muscles; in a few cases the antagonistic

muscles showed a decrease. Increased sensitiveness to both currents is

sometimes noticed.

[Footnote 44: “Writers' Cramp and Impaired Writing-power,” by C. V.

Poore, M.D., _Medico-Chirurgical Trans._, vol. lxi, 1878.]

COURSE.—The course of the disability is slow and, unless appropriate

treatment is instituted, progressive, although at times there are

periods during which the symptoms ameliorate without assignable cause,

thus giving rise to false hopes. The usual history is that group after

group of muscles becomes implicated as these are in turn used to

relieve those first affected, the left arm, should this be used,

becoming disabled in the same manner as the right, and the unfortunate

sufferer is then compelled to give up his calling or else to lessen

very materially the amount of his labor.

DURATION.—As might be inferred from what has been written, those who

have suffered for years with this affection may expect it to continue

for the remainder of their days; but the later investigations upon

this subject give rise to much hope that in future the duration of

this troublesome complaint will be materially shortened when the

disease is recognized early and treatment instituted at the very first

symptom.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS.—Although many of the cases of copodyscinesia

are diagnosed with comparative ease, there are others which require

much study, as there are several disorders which are apt to mislead by

the similarity of symptoms.

Any affection of the finger-joints or of the muscles of the hand or

arm, or any disease of the nerves or of the spinal cord, from which

these nerves arise, or of the corresponding part of the brain, will

necessarily interfere more or less with the finer movements of the

hand, and yet all these, manifestly, cannot be considered cases of

this affection.

Where the symptoms are undoubtedly caused by over-use of a part, by

the constant repetition of the same muscular act, although the lesions

{522} may vary considerably in the different cases, they may be

classed with propriety under the above head; but there is a second

class which cannot be so considered, in which there has been a central

lesion which has arisen entirely independently of the occupation which

has become difficult to perform, and which disability is only one of

the many symptoms that have arisen on account of the aforesaid lesion:

these are the cases that it is important to differentiate from cases

of true copodyscinesia.

When a patient is suffering from a difficulty in performing a fine act

of co-ordination where previously there had been no trouble, much

information as to the cause may be gained by examining critically the

method in which that act is attempted to be carried out; thus, if the

patient has a difficulty in writing, his method of holding the pen and

his style of writing may throw some light upon the diagnosis; if he

holds his pen too firmly or if the down strokes are too heavy, or the

writing gradually grows smaller and smaller toward the end of the

line, there is a spasm of the flexor muscles; if, on the contrary, the

down strokes are imperfectly made or the thumb rises upon the holder,

or one finger shows a tendency to straighten itself, the extensors are

at fault. Each muscle should then be examined. By asking the patient

to make the different movements possible with the fingers and hand of

the affected side, and comparing them with those of the sound side, a

feebleness of one or more muscles may be detected. The offending

muscle may also be detected by electrical examination—by its reacting

more or less strongly than its fellow on the other side to the faradic

current or showing a quantitative change to the galvanic current.

By stripping the patient to the waist, or at least the arms, and

making a careful examination, atrophy or local lesions may be detected

that will aid in clearing up the diagnosis.

In telegraphers the mode of manipulating the key should be noted if

possible, and the faults made in the different Morse characters

studied; this will show as much in this form of the trouble as the

mode of writing does in scriveners' palsy.

The condition described by Mitchell[45] as post-paralytic chorea may

easily be mistaken for these affections, especially where the cerebral

lesion was coincident with much manual work (as writing or

telegraphing), and was so slight in extent that the paralysis was

transient and overlooked, the choreoid movements appearing later, and

affecting, as they may do, only the hand. Of this condition Mitchell

states “that it may exist in all degrees, with partial loss of power

and with full normal strength—that it may consist in mere awkwardness,

or exist to the degree of causing involuntary choreoid movements of

the parts.”

[Footnote 45: “Post-paralytic Chorea,” by S. Weir Mitchell, _Am.

Journ. Med. Sci._, Oct., 1874.]

The diagnosis can, in most cases, be satisfactorily arrived at by

careful consideration of the history of the case, the mode of onset,

the presence of some other signs of cerebral lesion, and the

examination of the heart and of the urine.

Some cases of paresis of the arm or hand from lesions of slight extent

affecting the arm-centres in the brain (minute emboli, disease of the

finer vessels, etc.) might possibly be mistaken for the paretic form

of copodyscinesia. Two cases[46] will illustrate this point:

{523} Case I.—Mr. G.——, æt. 58, dentist. A great writer, although

writing was always a difficult task and soon fatigued him. One day,

after excessive writing the day previous, he awoke with a loss of

power to write from an inability to properly co-ordinate his muscles;

his hand was not unsteady, motion was apparently unimpaired, and his

power good, but after laboring for ten or fifteen minutes he would

drop the pen. He was treated for writers' paralysis, and gradually

improved. One year later he was seized with aphasia and entire loss of

power in the right arm and leg. His further history is that of right

hemiplegia, and not interesting in this connection.

Case II.—Mr. W——, civil engineer, æt. 54. Until July, 1881, he

considered himself a healthy man, although very excitable; he was then

engaged in calculating and writing almost steadily for one week, which

exhausted him exceedingly; following this, he was engaged in an

abstruse calculation lasting another week, and at the end of this

period he awoke to find himself powerless to extend or flex his wrist,

and, to use his expression, his thumb would gravitate into his palm.

The movements of the shoulder and arm were comparatively unimpaired,

and with the exception of occasional dimness of vision of the right

eye there was no other symptom noticed. In one week he considered

himself well again. In July, one year later, after again passing

through a period of exceedingly hard work, he awoke to find that he

had lost sensation on the right side and had some difficulty in

articulating (muscular). Although thus warned, he worked steadily for

twelve hours the next day, in consequence of which he completely broke

down. After this he would occasionally write down a wrong word or put

down a wrong figure in calculating, etc. One month later he had a

transient attack of loss of power in right leg and other signs of

partial right hemiplegia, which was in all probability due to an

embolus, as there was a marked aortic systolic murmur.

[Footnote 46: From S. Weir Mitchell's notebooks.]

The point brought forward by Axenfield[47] that the paralysis in brain

lesions manifests itself equally in all movements of the fingers,

while in writers' cramp, etc. there is integrity of all movements

except those necessary for the special act, cannot be accepted as

diagnostic.

[Footnote 47: _Des Névroses_, par le Docteur Axenfield, Paris, 1864,

p. 389.]

Progressive muscular atrophy, as previously mentioned, bears a close

resemblance to professional muscular atrophy (Onimus), which may be

considered one of the forms of copodyscinesia. The resemblance,

together with the few points of difference, may be best seen in the

form of a table, thus:

PROGRESSIVE MUSCULAR ATROPHY. | PROFESSIONAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY.

|

1. Heredity in 24.63 per cent. | 1. Heredity not marked.

(Roberts). |

|

2. Affects adult males | 2. Affects adult males

principally. | principally.

|

3. Frequently follows exhausting | 3. Always follows exhausting

muscular activity. | muscular activity.

|

4. Atrophy a cardinal symptom. | 4. Atrophy a cardinal symptom.

|

5. When it affects the upper | 5. The muscles first affected are

extremities, the interossei and | generally the largest ones,

the thenar and hypothenar | particularly those in the

eminences are the first | neighborhood of the

affected. (Eulenburg says in his | shoulder-joint. The muscles of

experience the first dorsal | the hand may be affected first.

interosseus is always first |

attacked, and the others later.) |

|

6. Fibrillary twitchings | 6. Fibrillary twitchings

frequent. | frequent.

| {524}

7. Premonitory pains rare. | 7. Pains and cramps at the onset

| in the affected parts a

| distinctive sign.

|

8. Diminution of electrical | 8. (?).

reactions to both faradism and |

galvanism. Reaction of |

degeneration occasionally a late |

symptom. |

|

9. Prognosis generally | 9. Rapid amendment under rest and

unfavorable: as regards perfect | the use of constant and

restoration of muscles, almost | continuous electric currents.

hopeless. |

The ordinary course of symptoms in this disease is not always followed

out, and occasionally the resemblance of the initiatory symptoms to

one of the forms of copodyscinesia is great; the following is a case

in point:

W. F. G——, æt. 34, clerk, at one time an excessive smoker and a steady

writer. In the autumn of 1883 he noticed a numbness on the ulnar side

of the tip of the right index finger and on the radial side of the

middle third of the right middle finger, at about the points touched

by the pen-holder, which he held between these two fingers; this was

soon accompanied by a hyperæsthesia to light touches, and the two

together seriously interfered with pen-prehension; he then changed the

pen to the left hand, and soon noticed a numbness on corresponding

points on the left fingers. Any sudden extension of the right arm

would cause a thrill to shoot down into the fingers. Weakness of the

right opponens pollicis was present at the same time. These symptoms

caused the first physician consulted to make a diagnosis of writers'

palsy, but the later manifestations of the disease, six weeks

subsequently, soon showed its true character: these were marked

atrophy of the external portion of the thenar eminence (opponens

pollicis) and weakness and partial atrophy, and finally total loss of

power, of the anterior group of muscles of right leg (tibialis

anticus, extensor proprius pollicis, and extensor longus digitorum);

numbness and hyperæsthesia, as in the hand, appeared over instep.

Fibrillary twitchings were absent. The affected muscles did not

respond to the faradic current, while to the galvanic current there

was a quantitative lessening, the reaction still being normal in

kind—viz. KaSZ > AnSZ.

Paralysis agitans and multiple sclerosis both interfere with writing

on account of the tremor of the muscles; the latter disease markedly

so, as voluntary effort increases the trembling.

According to Sigerson,[48] the flexors are the least affected in the

former disease, and the extensors most so, especially the interossei,

which are the earliest involved; the down strokes of the writing will

therefore be made with comparative firmness, while the up strokes will

show the tremor.[49]

[Footnote 48: _Lectures on the Diseases of the Nervous System_, by J.

M. Charcot, trans. Philada., 1879, foot-note by Sigerson, p. 113.]

[Footnote 49: _Ibid._, p. 112.]

The writing in multiple sclerosis is much more wavy and irregular,

although the same tendency to firmness in the down strokes may still

be seen.[50]

[Footnote 50: _Ibid._, foot-note by Bourneville, pp. 153, 154.]

Both these diseases, when well pronounced, should occasion no trouble

in diagnosis, but there are cases where the symptoms are not typical,

and where the sclerotic change is slight in amount and principally

limited to the arm-centres in the cord, or at least to the anterior

columns, the symptoms being confined to the finer movements of

co-ordination of the hand and arm, and necessarily interfering with

such occupations as writing {525} much more than with those which only

necessitate coarser movements. The following cases illustrate this

point:

Case I.—J. S——, æt. 67, male. Two relatives had paralysis agitans (?).

Previous health good; present trouble began nine years ago. Tremor

first noticed in writing, and only then, but later any voluntary

effort of right arm was accompanied by a fine tremor, which became

particularly noticeable when the arm was semiflexed. This is now equal

in both arms. When patient writes slowly and with great attention to

each movement, he can write fairly for a short time; but if he

attempts to write quickly, there is a marked tremor which renders the

letters sometimes almost illegible. The up strokes show the most

tremor. There is no festination, no change in voice, no loss of power

over the sphincters, and no loss of reflexes; the reaction to the

galvanic current is normal.

Case II.—W. H——, æt. 58, male. For fifty years the patient has been a

hard writer, first as an editor and later as a cashier. In 1882 he

noticed difficulty in raising arm to put away papers in pigeon-holes

above his head; this movement caused pain in shoulder and arm. Shortly

after this he found that his hand became tremulous when he attempted

to write, and later any voluntary effort was sufficient to cause the

tremor. There has been no cramp. The grip of both hands is good, nor

is there any wasting of the muscles. Standing with eyes closed causes

no swaying, although there are occasional vertiginous attacks. While

walking he has noticed that the right arm does not swing with its

usual freedom. No ataxic pains are present. Reflexes of right arm and

shoulder are very much exaggerated; there are no changes in nutrition

or sensation. Galvanic reaction normal and alike in both arms. The

urine is non-albuminous.

The following case is in all probability one of diffused sclerotic

changes in the right lateral half of the cord, where the disease has

apparently ceased advancing:

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 5 · 第 69 / 185 段