23. Not very long; on account of special statement.

Does the soul in its descent through ether, and so on, stay at each

stage for a not very long time, or is there nothing to define that time?--

It stays at each stage for an indefinite time, there being nothing to

define the time.--

Not so, the Sûtra decides. For there is a special statement, i.e. the

text says that when the soul has become rice or grain or the like, the

passing out of that stage is beset with difficulties. From this we infer

that as there is no such statement concerning the earlier stages, the

soul stays at each of them for a short time only.--Here terminates the

adhikarana of 'the not very long time.'

24. Into (plants) animated by other souls, because the statement is as

in the previous cases.

The text declares that 'he descending souls are born as rice, corn,'

&c., 'they are born here as rice, corn, herbs, trees,' &c. The question

here is whether the souls cling to plants animated by other souls which

have those plants for their bodies; or whether the descending souls

themselves are born with those plants for their bodies.--The latter view

is the right one; for the text says, 'they are born as rice, grain,' and

so on, and this expression is of the same kind as when we say 'he is

born as a man, as a deva,' and so on. The text therefore means that the

souls are embodied in the different plants.--This view the Sûtra

rejects. The souls merely cling to those plants which constitute the

bodies of other souls; 'since the statement is as in the previous

cases,' i.e. because the text only says that the souls become plants as

it had previously been said that they become ether, and so on. Where the

text means to say that the soul enters on the condition of an enjoying

soul (i.e. of a soul assuming a new body for the purpose of retributive

enjoyment), it refers to the deeds which lead to such enjoyment; so e.

g. in the passage, 'Those whose works have been good obtain a good

birth,' & c. But in the text under discussion there is no such reference

to karman. For those works--viz. sacrifices and the like--which were

undertaken with a view to reward, such as enjoyment of the heavenly

world, are, in the case of the descending souls, completely wiped out by

the enjoyment of the heavenly world (which precedes the descent of the

souls); and those works on the other hand, the action of which has not

yet begun, lead to the embodiments mentioned further on ('Those whose

works are good'). And in the interval between those two conditions no

new karman originates. When, therefore, the text says that the souls are

born as plants, the statement cannot be taken in its literal sense.

The Vedanta-Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja Sacred Books of the East, Volume 48 · 第 219 / 339 题