DISINTRODUCTIONS

The devil is a citizen of every country, but only in our own are we in

constant peril of an introduction to him. That is democracy. All men

are equal; the devil is a man; therefore, the devil is equal. If that

is not a good and sufficient syllogism I should be pleased to know what

is the matter with it.

To write in riddles when one is not prophesying is too much trouble;

what I am affirming is the horror of the characteristic American custom

of promiscuous, unsought and unauthorized introductions.

You incautiously meet your friend Smith in the street; if you had been

prudent you would have remained indoors. Your helplessness makes you

desperate and you plunge into conversation with him, knowing entirely

well the disaster that is in cold storage for you.

The expected occurs: another man comes along and is promptly halted

by Smith and you are introduced! Now, you have not given to the

Smith the right to enlarge your circle of acquaintance and select the

addition himself; why did he do this thing? The person whom he has

condemned you to shake hands with may be an admirable person, though

there is a strong numerical presumption against it; but for all that

the Smith knows he may be your bitterest enemy. The Smith has never

thought of that. Or you may have evidence (independent of the fact of

the introduction) that he is some kind of thief—there are one thousand

and fifty kinds of thieves. But the Smith has never thought of that.

In short, the Smith has never thought. In a Smithocracy all men, as

aforesaid, being equal, all are equally agreeable to one another.

That is a logical extension of the Declaration of American

Independence. If it is erroneous the assumption that a man will be

pleasing to me because he is pleasing to another is erroneous too, and

to introduce me to one that I have not asked nor consented to know is

an invasion of my rights—a denial and limitation of my liberty to a

voice in my own affairs. It is like determining what kind of clothing I

shall wear, what books I shall read, or what my dinner shall be.

In calling promiscuous introducing an American custom I am not unaware

that it obtains in other countries than ours. The difference is that

in those it is mostly confined to persons of no consequence and no

pretensions to respectability; here it is so nearly universal that

there is no escaping it. Democracies are naturally and necessarily

gregarious. Even the French of to-day are becoming so, and the time

is apparently not distant when they will lose that fine distinctive

social sense that has made them the most punctilious, because the most

considerate, of all nations excepting the Spanish and the Japanese. By

those who have lived in Paris since I did I am told that the chance

introduction is beginning to devastate the social situation, and men of

sense who wish to know as few persons as possible can no longer depend

on the discretion of their friends.

To say so is not the same thing as to say “Down with the republic!” The

republic has its advantages. Among these is the liberty to say, “Down

with the republic!”

It is to be wished that some great social force, say a billionaire,

would set up a system of disintroductions. It should work somewhat like

this:

MR. WHITE—Mr. Black, knowing the low esteem in which you hold each

other, I have the honor to disintroduce you from Mr. Green.

MR. BLACK (_bowing_)—Sir, I have long desired the advantage of your

unacquaintance.

MR. GREEN (_bowing_)—Charmed to unmeet you, sir. Our acquaintance (the

work of a most inconsiderate and unworthy person) has distressed me

beyond expression. We are greatly indebted to our good friend here for

his tact in repairing the mischance.

MR. WHITE—Thank you. I’m sure you will become very good strangers.

This is only the ghost of a suggestion; of course the plan is capable

of an infinite elaboration. Its capital defect is that the persons

who are now so liberal with their unwelcome introductions, will be

equally lavish with their disintroductions, and will estrange the best

of friends with as little ceremony as they now observe in their more

fiendish work.

1902.

The Collected Works of Ambrose Bierce, Volume 09 Tangential Views · 第 57 / 83 题