COLUMBUS

The human mind is affected with a singular disability to get a sense

of an historical event without a gigantic figure in the foreground

overtopping all his fellows. As surely as God liveth, if one hundred

congenital idiots were set adrift in a scow to get rid of them, and,

borne by favoring currents into eyeshot of an unknown continent, should

simultaneously shout, “Land ho!” instantly drowning in their own drool,

we should have one of them figuring in history ever thereafter with a

growing glory as an illustrious discoverer of his time. I do not say

that Columbus was a navigator and discoverer of that kind, nor that he

did anything of that kind in that way; the parallel is perfect only

in what history has done to Columbus; and some seventy millions of

Americans are authenticating the imposture all they know how. In this

whole black business hardly one element of falsehood is lacking.

Columbus was not a learned man, but an ignorant. He was not an

honorable man, but a professional pirate. He was, in the most hateful

sense of the word, an adventurer. His voyage was undertaken with a

view solely to his own advantage, the gratification of an incredible

avarice. In the lust of gold he committed deeds of cruelty, treachery

and oppression for which no fitting names are found in the vocabulary

of any modern tongue. To the harmless and hospitable peoples among whom

he came he was a terror and a curse. He tortured them, he murdered

them, he sent them over the sea as slaves. So monstrous were his

crimes, so conscienceless his ambition, so insatiable his greed, so

black his treachery to his sovereign, that in his mere imprisonment and

disgrace we have a notable instance of “the miscarriage of justice.”

In the black abysm of this man’s character we may pile falsehood upon

falsehood, but we shall never build the monument high enough to top

the shadow of his shame. Upon the culm and crown of that reverend pile

every angel will still look down and weep.

We are told that Columbus was no worse than the men of his race and

generation—that his vices were “those of his time.” No vices are

peculiar to any time; this world has been vicious from the dawn of

history, and every race has reeked with sin. To say of a man that he

is like his contemporaries is to say that he is a scoundrel without

excuse. The virtues are accessible to all. Athens was vicious, yet

Socrates was virtuous. Rome was corrupt, but Marcus Aurelius was not

corrupt. To offset Nero the gods gave Seneca. When literary France

groveled at the feet of the third Napoleon Hugo stood erect.

It will be a dark day for the world when infractions of the moral law

by A and B are accepted as justification of the sins of C. But even in

the days of Columbus men were not all pirates; God inspired enough of

them to be merchants to serve as prey for the others; and while turning

his honest penny by plundering them, the great Christopher was worsted

by a Venetian trading galley and had to pickle his pelt in a six-mile

swim to the Portuguese coast, a wiser and a wetter thief. If he had

had the hard luck to drown we might none of us have been Americans,

but the gods would have missed the revolting spectacle of an entire

people prostrate before the blood-beslubbered image of a moral idiot,

performing solemn rites of adoration with a litany of lies.

In comparison with the crimes of Columbus his follies cut a sorry

figure. Yet the foolhardy enterprise to whose failure he owes his fame

is entitled to distinction. With sense enough to understand the earth’s

spheroid form (he thought it pear-shaped) but without knowledge of its

size, he believed that he could reach India by sailing westward and

died in the delusion that he had done so—a trifling miscalculation—a

matter of eight or ten thousands of miles. If this continent had

not happened to lie right across his way he and his merry men would

all have gone fishing, with themselves for bait and the devil a

hook among them. Firmness is persistence in the right; obstinacy is

persistence in the wrong. With the light that he had, Columbus was

so wildly, dismally and fantastically wrong that his refusal to turn

back was nothing less than pig-headed unreason, and his crews would

have been abundantly justified in deposing him. The wisdom of an

act is not to be determined by the outcome, but by the performer’s

reasonable expectation of success. And after all, the expedition failed

lamentably. It accomplished no part of its purpose, but by a happy

chance it accomplished something better—for us. As to the red Indians,

such of them as have been good enough to assist in apotheosis of the

man whom their ancestors had the deep misfortune to discover may justly

boast themselves the most magnanimous of mammals.

And when all is conceded there remains the affronting falsehood that

Columbus discovered America. Surely in all these drunken orgies of

beatification—in all this carnival of lies there should be found

some small place for Lief Ericsson and his wholesome Northmen, who

discovered, colonized and abandoned this continent five hundred

years before, and of whom we are forbidden to think as corsairs and

slave-catchers. The eulogist is always a calumniator. The crown that

he sets upon the unworthy head he first tears from the head that is

worthy. So the honest fame of Lief Ericsson is cast as rubbish to the

void, and the Genoese pirate is pedestaled in his place.

But falsehood and ingratitude are sins against Nature, and Nature is

not to be trifled with. Already we feel, or ought to feel, the smart of

her lash. Our follies are finding us out. Our Columbian Exhibition has

for its chief exhibit our national stupidity, and displays our shame.

Our Congress “improves the occasion” to make a disgraceful surrender

to the Chadbands and Stigginses of churches by a bitter observance of

the Sabbath. Managers of the show steal the first one thousand dollars

that come into their hands by bestowing them upon a schoolgirl related

to one of themselves, for a “Commemoration Ode” as long as the language

and as foolish as its grammar—the ragged, tagless and bobtailed yellow

dog of commemoration odes. And _this_ while Whittier lived to

suffer the insult, and Holmes to resent it. What further exhibits

of our national stupidity and lack of moral sense space has been

engaged for in the world’s contempt one can only conjecture. In the

meantime state appropriations are being looted, art is in process of

caricature, literature is debauched, and we have a Columbian Bureau

of Investigation and Suppression with a daily mail as voluminous as

that of a commercial city. If at the finish of this revealing revelry

self-respecting Americans shall not have lost through excessive use the

power to blush, and all Europe the ability to laugh, another Darwin

should write another book on the expression of the emotions in men and

animals.

That nothing might be lacking to the absurdity of the scheme, the

falsehood marking all the methods of its execution, we must needs avail

ourselves of an alteration in the calendar and have two anniversary

celebrations of one event. And in culmination of this comedy of

falsehood, the later date must formally open, with dedicatory rites, an

exhibition which will not be open for six months. One falsehood begets

another and another in the line of succession, until the father of them

all shall have colonized his whole progeny upon the congenial soil of

this new Dark Continent.

Why should not the four-hundredth anniversary of the rediscovery

of America have been made memorable by fitly celebrating it with a

becoming sense of the stupendous importance of the event, without

thrusting into the forefront of the rites the dismal personality of

the very small man who made the find? Could not the most prosperous

and vain people of the earth see anything to celebrate in the four

centuries between San Salvador and Chicago but it must sophisticate

history by picking that offensive creature out of his shame to make him

a central, dominating figure of the festival? Thank Heaven, there is

one thing that all the genius of the anthropolaters can not do. Quarrel

as we may about the relative claims to authenticity of portraits

painted from description, we can not perpetuate the rogue’s visible

appearance “in his habit as he lived.” Audible to the ear of the

understanding fall with unceasing iteration from the lips of his every

statue in every land the words, “I am a lie!”

1892.

The Collected Works of Ambrose Bierce, Volume 09 Tangential Views · 第 12 / 83 题