21.8. The law, if fully enforced, would no doubt have done much injury,

however great its benefits. _E.g._, a great amount of land had been

hypothecated to the Church with no expectation on either side that

the loan which it secured would ever be paid; but the government, in

order to obtain cash, intended that the loan should be paid or the land

sold. Many individuals would thus have been ruined and the agricultural

interests partially crippled, while on account of the small amount of

money in circulation, only very low prices would have been realized

for the land (=13=Bankhead, no. 7, 1847). Moreover, land with a Church

curse upon it was sure to sell slowly, and many believed that titles

obtained in this way would not hold good very long. As the clergy would

give no information about their property, some exempted property was

seized, and these mistakes caused trouble (México á través, iv, 631).

Many objected to the law because they presumed that the proceeds of

sales would reach private pockets. The principal arguments against

it were summed up by the =88=ayuntamiento of Córdoba as follows: "It

attacks property, invades the rights of the states, contravenes the

sovereignty of the Church and is anti-religious, for there can be no

religion without worship, no worship without priests and no priests

without Church property." On the other hand the Puro =92=ayuntamiento

of the capital described the law as "A law to save our independence

and religion, in which nothing is done except that one class of

society is to loan its property to society as a whole," adding, "How

unfortunate would be our faith, if the religion of the Savior could be

supported only with money ... charity and poverty were the example of

his mission." The metropolitan chapter of Mexico took the ground that

property once consecrated to God was sacred, and that to take it would

be an act of sacrilege sure to bring upon the country the wrath and

punishment of heaven (=92=Representación). The bishop of Puebla said

to his flock: "Far from us is the idea of disturbing public order,

but we must notify our very dear lambs that the pasturage offered

thorn is poisonous; and if for so doing we incur the wrath of men,

we will strengthen our weakness with the words of the chief of the

Apostles at the council of the Jews: 'We must obey God rather than

men'" (=82=Manifiesto). This was a clear and official incitement to

insurrection.

21.9. _The law of Jan. 11 and the struggle over it._ Apuntes, 124-32.

=13=Bankhead, nos. 180, 1846; 6, 7, 10, 14, 17, 1847. Gaxiola,

Invasión, 118. =52=J. Parrott, Feb. 6. =56=Beach, report, June 4.

London _Times_, Sept. 9; Oct. 7, 1846; Mar. 11; May 12, 1847. Oil

portrait of Farías, city hall, Mex. =52=Consul Black, Feb. 24. _Revue

Indep._, Apr. 25, 1845. Rivera, Jalapa, iii, 822, 825-6. _Católico_,

iii, 553. Conducta Admin, de Berdusco. _Ilustrador Católico_, no.

239. =88=Córdoba ayunt., Feb. 4. =92=Mex. ayunt. to chapter, Jan. 14.

=92=Ayunt., procl., Jan. 14. =92=Representación of metrop. chapter to

Cong. =92=Segunda Protesta; Tercera Protesta del Ven. C bildo Metrop.

=92=Exposición que el Sr. Vicario Capit. =92=Expos. del Cabildo Metrop.

=92=Procl. of gov. Fed. Dist., Jan. 16. =95=Querét. cong., Jan. 12.

=95=Puebla ayunt. to gov., Jan. 16. =95=Sánchez to Puebla ayunt.,

Feb. 16. =82=Bish. Puebla, manif., Jan. 27. =82=Gov. Puebla, procl.,

Jan. 27; Mar. 5, 15. Lamentos de los Mex. =73=Bermúdez de Castro,

nos. 332, res., 346, 445. Dublan, Legislación, v., 246, 255, 261-2.

_Registro Oficial de Durango_, Jan. 26. =80=Guanajuato cong., Jan. 29.

_Locomotor_, Jan. 18. Mora, Papeles, 74-6. Negrete, Invasión iv, app.,

412-4. Ramírez, México, 172, 184, 188, 190, 193, 198. _Diario_, Dec.

21, 1846; Jan. 7-9, 11-16, 18, 19, 26, 30; Feb. 4, 1847. _Republicano_,

Dec. 9, 12, 1846; Jan. 8, 11, 23-4, 27, 29; Feb. 6, 11, 12; May 14,

1847. México á través, iv, 601-8, 628, 630-1, 638. And the following

from =76=. Comte. gen. Querét., Jan. 19, 20, 22. _Id._, procl., Jan.

20. Comte gen. Puebla, Jan. 12, 28; Feb. 17. Guerra, order, Jan. 24.

Min. eccles. affairs to metropol. chapter, Jan. 14. Comte. gen. Mex.,

Jan. 15. Comte. gen. Jalisco, Feb. 2. J. Alvarez, Feb. 2. Comte. gen.

Oaxaca, Feb. 11, 15. Comte. gen. Guanaj., Jan. 29; Feb. 15, res. To

comte. gen. Puebla, Feb. 24. Decrees, Jan. 15, 27; Feb. 4, 7, 10. To S.

Anna, Jan. 30. S. Anna, Jan. 7, 13, 22, 26, 29; Feb. 9.

21.10. _Beach's mission and escape._ =56=Special Missions, p. 257.

=56=Beach report, June 4, 1847. Polk, Diary, Apr. 14, 1847. =108=Mrs.

Storms to Bancroft, July 23, 1846, and Marcy's endorsement. Griffis,

Perry, 224. =52=Consul Black, Jan. 28, 1847. N. Y. _Sun_, Apr. 15;

Aug. 16, 24, 1847. =166=Dimond to Conner, Jan. --, 1847. _Scribner's

Monthly_, xvii, 300. Appleton, Amer. Biog. (article on M. Y. B.).

Kenly, Md. Vol., 269. =76=To comte. gen. V. Cruz, Jan. 14. =76=Landero,

Jan. 14. =76=S. Anna, Jan. 22.

21.11. Apuntes, 126. =13=Bankhead, no. 14, 1847. =56=Beach, report,

June 4, 1847. Ramírez, México, 193-4, 198-9. México á través, iv, 608,

631. =199=Anon. MS. of go-between.

21.12. The monarchists, who were closely associated with the Church,

shared in the insurrection (Apuntes, 119), and no doubt many of the

Moderados took part in it (London _Times_, May 10, 1847), though

Pedraza denied positively that he drew up the plan (Apuntes, 131).

21.13. _The insurrection._ =56=Beach, report, June 4, 1847. Apuntes,

126, 128-37. =13=Bankhead, no. 17, 1847. Consideraciones, 37. Méx.

en 1847, 14, 19. León, Hist. Gen., 475. =52=J. Parrott, Feb. 6.

Bustamante, Campaña sin, etc., 5, 8, 10, 11, 13. =52=Black, Mar.

6. London _Times_, May 10, 12. Salas, pamphlet, Mar. 3. =13=Peña

y Barragán, procl., Mar. 8. Séptimo Disengaño. _Boletín de la

Democracia_, Mar. 2, 7, 13. Farías, Address. Ramírez, México, 190,

193, 198-9, 201, 204, 209. México á través, iv, 631-5. Rivera,

Jalapa, iii, 841-9. _Arco Iris_, Nov. 24, 1847. Escudero, Mems., 14,

19, 20. =82=Zacatecas cong., Mar. 5. =82=Jalísco legisl., Mar. 12.

=77=Relaciones, circular, Mar. 13. =80=Méx. state legisl., Mar. 18.

Balbontín, Invasión, 104. =80=Lt. gov. Méx. state procl., Mar. 23.

=199=Anon. MS. =76=Farías, procl. =83=Gov. Querét. to Peña y Barragán,

Mar. 2, 20. Rivera, Los Gobernantes, ii., 318. N. Y. _Sun_, Apr. 15;

Aug. 24. _Díario_, Feb. 20, 21. _Monitor Repub._, Dec. 27, 1846;

Feb. 13; Mar. 23. Ho. 60; 30, 1, p. 1125 (S. Anna). Lerdo de Tejada,

Apuntes, ii, 539. And from =76= the following, besides others of minor

importance. Comte. gen. Querét., Jan. 20. Canalizo to Anaya, Feb. 26.

J. Alvarez, Mar. 10. L. Carrión, Mar. 10. Gov. Puebla, Feb. 17; reply,

Feb. 24. Plan of Puebla insurgents, Feb. 27. Govt. bulletins, Mar. 2,

5. Morales, Mar. 1. Aguascalientes legisl., Mar. 4. Gov. Zacat. to

Relac., Mar. 5. Gov. Querét. to Relac., Mar. 9. Provis. gov. Jalisco to

Relac., Mar. 3. Comte. gen. Jalisco to garrison, Mar. 7. Gov. Puebla to

Relac., Mar. 5. Lt. Col. Indep. battal. to mistress, Mar. 15. Comte.

gen. Oaxaca, Feb. 17. Gov. Méx. state to Relac., Mar. 19. _Id._,

procl., Mar. 18. Decrees, Mar. 1, 8, 12, 15.

On this subject Beach reported in substance as follows: When the

government resolved to raise money on the Church property, I urged the

clericals to an organized resistance. They consented, and at the moment

of General Scott's debarkation at Vera Cruz they made a most important

diversion in his favor by raising the standard of civil war at the

capital, at Puebla and in a degree at Michoacán. This occupied 5000 men

and all the arms, munitions of war and means of the government in the

city of Mexico for twenty-three days; effectually preventing them from

aiding Vera Cruz, or strengthening Puebla or the strongholds nearer

the coast. On the tenth day of this rebellion or _pronunciamiento_, I

was informed that $40,000 would be required of the clergy to carry it

on another week, and that it would be paid if the importance of the

crisis justified the outlay. As General Scott had but just landed his

artillery at Vera Cruz, and might be detained there for some time. I

deemed that almost any outlay would be justified. The rebellion was

therefore kept up, until the sudden appearance of General Santa Anna

closed the affair. [One must remember, in passing judgment on the

conduct of the clergy, how much they had suffered at the hands of Santa

Anna and how much reason they had to fear him.]

Beach had arranged to visit Mexico on private business, and he

persuaded Buchanan that he could, through Almonte and others, bring

about peace. Hence he was appointed "confidential agent to the Republic

of Mexico" to accomplish what he could; and, on learning the state of

things at Mexico, he saw that Scott's operations could be materially

assisted by inaugurating and continuing the clerical insurrection. His

report may be found in the state department archives at Washington.

21.14. Santa Anna left San Luis Potosí March 15 with more than 5000 men

and ten guns.

21.15. Rejón wrote to Santa Anna, March 7, 1847, urging him to stand

firmly by his manifesto of August 16, 1846,--_i.e._ by the Puros, and

detailing a series of Moderado intrigues intended (he said) to annoy

and humiliate Santa Anna until he should inaugurate a revolution, with

a view to then having him shot.

21.16. Beach was watched for several days before he left the city.

He escaped by paying for his lodgings for some time to come, leaving

a trunk there, taking a carriage late at night without baggage, and

choosing an unusual route (N. Y. _Sun_, Aug. 16, 1847). A reward of

$1000 was offered for him dead or alive (_ibid._, Aug. 24). Notices

were put up denouncing as a traitor anyone possessing a copy of the New

York _Sun_. He was accused of having tried to bring about a clerical

revolution and also to induce the states of Guanajuato, Querétaro, San

Luis Potosí and Jalisco to secede and declare for the United States.

See also N. Y. _Sun_, May 27, 1847; Polk, Diary, May 11, 1847; Kenly,

Md. Vol., 269. We shall hear again of Beach's operations.

21.17. Santa Anna received news of the insurrection near Cedral.

21.18. Santa Anna may very possibly have hoped now to combine the

military class, the conservatives and the clericals into a solid

phalanx behind him, and he may have commended the movement against

Church property for the very purpose of making the clergy feel the need

of his assistance. See Tributo á la Verdad, 76.

21.19. His overthrow was not really due to the law of January 11, but

resulted from his radical ideas and unpractical methods, the odium

of his former administration, his consequent inability to secure the

coöperation of influential men, and the general state of unrest and

dissension.

21.20. _Outcome of the insurrection._ Apuntes, 111, 115-8, 133, 136-8.

=13=Bankhead, nos. 33, 34, 1847. Méx. en 1847, 14-18. =69=S. Anna,

order, Mar. 14. _Anglo-Saxon_, Mar. 13. =56=Beach, report, June 4,

1847. Bustamante, Campaña, 30. London _Times_, May 10. _Britannia_,

May 15. México á través, iv, 577, 635-40. Ramírez, México, 184, 198-9,

205, 207, 209-12, 215-8. =82=Gov. Puebla, boletín No. 4 (S. Anna to

Farías, Mar. 6; Gil to Ruano, Mar. 6). =77=Relaciones, circulars,

Mar. 22; Apr. 1. Tributo á la Verdad, 76. =75=Rejón to S. Anna, Mar.

7. =84=Palacios to Gov. S. L. P., Mar. 17. _Republicano_, Mar. 24.

=75a=Hacienda, circular, Mar. 29. Puga y Acal, Docs., 62-3. Escudero,

Mems., 19. Bustamante, Nuevo Bernal, ii, 146-7. Dublán, Legisl., v,

262-5. _Locomotor_, Jan. 18. Baz, Juárez, 47. _Diario_, Mar. 29,

1847 (Baz). The twenty-millions law had very little effect, if any.

_Le Constitutionnel_, June 17, 1847 (The clergy have kept none of

the promises by the aid of which they obtained the repeal of the

confiscation of their property).

XXII. VERA CRUZ

22.1. "New volunteers," those called out in November. For the ten

transports see chap. xviii, note 18.28. Jan. 18 Conner wrote to Scott

that Santa Anna had moved, about January 1, against Taylor, but that

from all accounts presumably Taylor had probably retired to Monterey

(Ho. 60; 30, 1, p. 893). It was therefore natural for Scott to feel

satisfied that Santa Anna, learning of the expedition against Vera

Cruz, would retrace his steps and reach that place in season. At

Scott's instance a spy, selected by Consul Campbell with the aid of

Consul Dimond (who visited Cuba for the purpose), was to have set out

from Havana in January for Mexico City and San Luis Potosí (=166=Dimond

to Conner, Jan. 15); but the author found no further trace of him.

22.2. Some transports reached Antón Lizardo Feb. 27 and notified

Conner that Scott was coming (=162=Conner, Feb. 27). Certain troops,

leaving Tampico March 1, arrived at that rendezvous in advance of Scott

(=139=W. B. Campbell to wife, Mar. 6). By sunset on March 5 about

seventy sail had appeared there.

22.3. _To Antón Lizardo._ Macgregor, Progress, i, 677. =47=Conner, Dec.

1 1846; Feb. 17; Mar. 7, 10, 1847. =159=Collins narrative. =298=Porter,

diary. =66=Remarks in margin of chart of V. Cruz harbor. Le Clercq,

Voyage, 401, 418. Robertson, Remins., 214-6. Campos, Recuerdos, 31.

Hitchcock, Fifty Years, 238. Grant, Mems., i, 125. Hartman, Journal,

6. Taylor, Broad Pennant, 123. _Picayune_, Mar. 26. _Delta_, Oct.

16. Meade, Letters, i, 187. =65=Scott, gen. orders 28, 33, 34, 37.

=313=Saunders to Conner, Mar. 5. Oswandel, Notes, 63. Semmes, Service,

106, 109, 111. Kenly, Md. Volunteer, 266. Lawton, Artillery Officer,

65-6, 68. =146=Caswell, diary. =322=Smith, diary. Kitchen, Record,

21-2. =270=Moore, diary. =327=Sutherland, letter. Ballentine, English

Soldier, i, 257, 261. =254=McClellan to sister, Feb. 23. Moore,

Scott's Campaign, 1-4. Parker, Recolls., 49, 82. Washington _Union_,

Apr. 6. _Monitor Repub._, Mar. 16. =164=Scott to Conner, Feb. 22, 26.

=162=Conner to wife, Aug. 10, 1846; Feb. 26, 27, 1847. Ho. 60; 30,

1, pp. 879, 892 (Conner); 896 (Hetzel); 893, 896, 899 (Scott); 568

(Jesup). Nebel and Kendall, 17. Diccionario Univ. (_Antón Lizardo_).

_Niles_, Mar. 13, 1847, p. 21. =332=Tennery, diary. Sedgwick, Corresp.,

i, 65. =254=McClellan, diary. =165=Conner to Scott, Jan. 18; to Breese

and to Aulick, Feb. 28. Hammersly, Naval Encyclop., 94. =139=W. B.

Campbell to wife, Mar. 6. Smith, To Mexico, 108-10. =76=Garay, Mar. 5.

=76=Cos, Feb. 19, 21. =76=Soto, Mar. 7. =76=Watchman at Ulúa, Mar. 5.

22.4. For additional information regarding San Juan de Ulúa the reader

may consult chapters xviii and xxx.

21.5. New York letters received in Cuba and made known at Mexico gave

notice that Scott planned to capture Vera Cruz before attacking Ulúa

(=76=Relaciones, Jan. 26); some Mexicans believed he would enter the

Antigua River (which emptied a short distance to the north) with boats,

and strike at once into the interior; some thought he would land at

Tuxpán, and march south along the coast; and some ridiculed the idea of

an attack upon Vera Cruz on the ground that, since the Americans could

not possibly reach the capital by that route, it would be useless to

capture the city (_Monitor Repub._, Mar. 28). Many argued that in any

case Ulúa would protect Vera Cruz.

22.6. Besides fine old Spanish guns, there were new and heavy English

pieces (_Nacional_, July 12, 1846) and twenty recently cast in the

United States (Davis, Autobiog., 131). A battery of sixteen bronze long

24-pdrs., made in England in 1840, was pronounced by American artillery

officers "far superior" to anything of the sort they had seen elsewhere

(=213= Hatch to father, Apr. 2). It was in the city. As to the amount

of ordnance in the city and castle accounts differed. Scott made it 400

pieces; Hitchcock, upwards of 350; Balbontín, 113 mounted, 46 unmounted

at Ulúa, 83 and 57 respectively at Vera Cruz; G. T. M. Davis, 390

effective pieces. The statement of the Mexican government, December,

1846 (based of course on earlier reports), was as follows: Vera Cruz,

mounted, bronze, eleven 24's, twenty 16's, six 12's, four 8's, four

4's, four mountain 4's, five 12-inch mortars, seven 8-inch howitzers,

and of iron, mounted, three 42-lb. mortars, three 24-lb. cannon, five

12's, nine 8's, six 13-inch mortars, two 9-inch mortars; Ulúa, bronze,

mounted, thirty-six 24's, four 16's, four 8's, two 14-inch mortars,

and of iron, mounted, ten 84-lb. mortars, ten 68-lb. mortars, sixteen

42-lb. mortars, fifty-one 24-lb. cannon, two 16's,--a total of 224

besides a considerable number of unmounted pieces in both places, some

of which were doubtless mounted later (Memoria de ... Guerra). Still

other guns were sent from the interior. Possibly some unserviceable

ordnance may have been included in the highest American figures.

Balbontín gives the number of firearms as 7369--half of the total

number belonging to the government. Ripley (War with Mex., ii, 19) and

Wilcox (Mex. War, 251) state that there was no ditch, but the weight of

evidence seems to be against them. Perhaps the drifting sand filled the

ditch before the Americans took the city.

22.7. It was not easy to believe that the factions at Mexico would

not agree to turn their arms against the Americans on learning they

had landed. March 9 the state of Vera Cruz issued a strong appeal to

them and to the nation. Neutrals and valuable neutral property were

taken aboard foreign war-vessels (=12=Matson to Giffard, Mar. 5). The

American blockade had greatly impaired the resources of the state and

city. A forced loan was imposed by the former, but no large receipts

could be expected.

22.8. The accepted (not official) Mexican figures were 1030 for Ulúa

and 3360 for Vera Cruz, but the authorities did not consider it

obligatory to publish the correct number. =13=March 11 the British

consul, Giffard, reported the garrisons as about 1500 and 4000

respectively, and later (according to Mexican accounts that were

probably rather flattering) more than 1000 threw themselves into the

city. Santa Anna stated in April that Morales had 5000 in the town

(=76=S. Anna, Apr. 29), but he was unfriendly to that officer. Scott's

figures were 5000 besides those who perished or escaped during the

siege; but before the surrender he heard the city alone had that number

(Sen. 1; 30, 1, p. 221). British naval officers stated there were about

6000 in city and castle (Meade, Letters, i, 188), and Col. Campbell was

told there were 5-6000 (=139=to wife, Mar. 6). The Mexicans complained

of a lack of gunners, but their own figures were 680. No doubt the

troops were poorly cared for, but such was the custom. Robles counted

for not a little. In the autumn of 1846 Landero, personally liked but

considered wanting in ability and regarded as a tool of Santa Anna, was

made comte. gen. because Morales was strenuously denounced by Santa

Anna as politically unsafe (=76=S. Anna, Oct. 14); but on the approach

of the crisis the people forced a change, and the confidence inspired

by Morales enabled him (Landero admitted in his =76=report, Apr. 3,

1847) to accomplish more than the latter could have done. Particular

resentment was felt against Santa Anna for taking away in August, 1846,

the best regiment (the Eleventh Infantry). For the names of corps at

Vera Cruz and Ulúa see Roa Bárcena, Recuerdos, 158.

22.9. _The situation at Vera Cruz and Ulúa._ =13=Consul Giffard,

Nov. 1; Dec. 1, 1846; Feb. 28; Mar. 11, 1847. =52=Consul Dimond, no.

336, May 2, 1846. Engineer School, U. S. Army, Occasional Papers,

no. 16. =218=Henshaw narrative. =280=Nunelee, diary. =159=Collins,

diary. =6=Bravo to Tola, Apr. 18, 1846. =224=Hitchcock, diary,

Mar. 13. =13=Pakenham, no. 25, 1842. _National_, July 12, 1846.

_Constitutionnel_, May 8, 1847. W. S. Parrott, Feb. 6, 1847. =80=México

state legislature to people. Memoria de ... Guerra, Dec., 1846, p.

22. (Cisterns, etc.) Lyon, Journal, ii, 221. Orbigny, Voyage, 407-8.

Robertson, Visit, i, 232, 239. Ruxton, Adventures (London, 1847),

12-15. Robertson, Remins., 225-6, 235, 237. Lerdo de Tejada, Apuntes,

ii, 541-50, 552, 569. Naredo, Orizaba, i, 107-8. Scott. Mems., ii, 422.

Hitchcock, Fifty Years, 248. Ballentine, English Soldier, i, 288-9.

Sen. 1; 30, 1, p. 239. Balbontín, Estado, 49-55. Tributo á la Verdad,

17-26, 29, 88. Apuntes, 152-5. S. Anna, Apelación, 33. _Delta_, Oct.

16, 1847. =350=Weber, recolls. =12=Matson to Giffard, Mar. 5, 1847;

to Fischer, Mar. 8; to commodore, Mar. 10, 25. Oswandel, Notes, 102.

Semmes, Service, 102, 104-6. =139=W. B. Campbell to D. C, Mar. 20.

Rivera, Jalapa, iii, 56, 865. Otero, Comunicación, 11. _Diario_, Apr.

8. _Republicano_, Dec. 8, 1846. =86=Relaciones to gov., Jan. 27, 1847;

reply, Feb. 1. =86=State treas. to gov., Jan. 15. =86=Morales to gov.,

Feb. 8. =90=Soto, proclam., Mar. 2. =90=_Id._ to state congress, Dec.

1, 1846. =100=V. Cruz ayunt. to prefect, June 4, 1846. =100=Bravo to

ayunt., June 9, 1846. =100=Ayunt. to jefe of dept, Oct. 26, 1846.

=100=Soto, proclam., Feb. 6, 1847. =88=_Id._, proclam., Feb. 15, 1847.

_Regenerador Repub._ Puebla, Mar. 13; Apr. 7, 1847. =82=Noticias

de V. Cruz. Kenly, Md. Volunteer, 267. México á través, iv, 600.

Lawton, Artillery Officer, 67, 105-7. El Estado de Veracruz a Todos.

Memoria de ... Guerra, Dec, 1846. =146=Caswell, diary. =270=Moore,

diary. =73=Bermúdez de Castro, nos. 441, 445, Feb. 28; Mar. 2, 1847.

Bustamante, Nuevo Bernal, ii, 67. Valois, Mexique, 40-43. =271=Morales

to commander of Ulúa, Oct. 20, 1846. Moore, Scott's Campaign, 12.

Conner, Castle of S. Juan de Ulloa, 13. Parker, Recolls., 79. (Learned)

_Monitor Repub._, Nov. 13, 30, 1846; Mar. 28, 1847. Negrete, Invasión,

iv, app., 413-4. =166=Campbell to Conner, Jan. 9, 1847. =166=Pommarès

to Conner, Oct. 15, 1846. Ho. 60; 30, 1, pp. 911, 1169 (Scott). Meade,

Letters, i, 188. Diccionario Univ. (_Ulúa_). =47=Conner, Oct. 4,

1846. =165=_Id._ to Scott, Jan. 18; Feb. 5, 1847. =100=Soto to jefe,

V. Cr. dept., Sept. 17, 1846. =100=Jefe to V. Cr. ayunt., Dec. 21,

1846. Bishop, Journal, 29. _Niles_, May 9, 1846, p. 160. _So. Quart.

Rev._, July, 1851. =86=V. Cruz congress, manifiesto, Mar. 9. And from

=76= the following. A large amount of correspondence between the

dept. and successive commanders at Vera Cruz, particularly in March,

April, Sept. and Oct., 1846, Jan. and Feb., 1847, relating to the

fortifications, garrison, supplies and dangers of the city and Ulúa. S.

Anna, Oct. 12, 14, 20, 1846; Jan. 14, 18; Apr. 29, 1847. Morales, Jan.

20, 1847. Tampico letter to Garay, Jan. 25. Soto, Feb. 7, 15; Mar. 7,

etc. Morales, Feb. 9, 15; Mar. 4, 5, etc. _Boletín de la Democracia_,

Mar. 2, 1847 (N. Y. letter, Jan. 8). To S. Anna, Oct. 17, 1846; Jan.

30, 1847. To Morales, Mar. 6, 7. Morales, proclam., Mar. 5. Landero,

report, Apr. 3. Jalapa letter, Mar. 16. Canalizo to Hacienda, Jan. 11.

Landero, Jan. 25, 1847. J. Alvarez, Oct. 21, 1846. Memo., Feb. 9, 1847.

Tampico letter, Dec. 30, 1846. Morales to Marín, Mar. 11.

22.10. What Scott called his "little cabinet" consisted of Col.

Totten (chief engineer), Lieut. Col. Hitchcock (acting inspector

general), Capt. Robert E. Lee (engineer) and H. L. Scott (acting as

military secretary). Col. James Bankhead was chief artillery officer,

Capt. Huger was acting chief of ordnance, and Maj. Turnbull was

the chief topographical engineer (Sen. 1; 30, 1, pp. 239-40). Col.

Harney commanded the regular cavalry, and Capt. Edson commanded three

companies of marines loaned by Conner, and temporarily attached to the

Third Artillery. At this time the engineers, artillery and cavalry were

kept by Scott under his immediate orders. While at Lobos Islands he

laid down the rule (=65=gen. orders 33) that every project of siege or

bombardment should first be discussed between the senior engineer and

artillery officers and then reported to him for approval or amendment.

Hence the detailed plan for the operations at Vera Cruz came formally

from Totten, and he has been credited with originating it.

22.11. Simms wrote to Gov. Hammond of South Carolina that Scott's

operations at Vera Cruz lacked brilliancy.

22.12. Conner had reckoned upon the starvation method; but (1) the

amount of supplies in the town and castle was not certainly known and,

as we shall find, was too large for this method; (2) fishing was a

resource of unmeasured value (even from the mole great quantities of

fish were caught: _Delta_, Oct. 16, 1847); (3) it was possible that on

some night the American line might be temporarily broken, and thousands

of cattle be run into the city; (4) as British observers agreed, the

Mexicans were capable of bearing privations for a long while; (5) Scott

rested under an imperative obligation to remove his army from the coast

in time to save it from the vómito; and (6) he had to count on reducing

Ulúa after capturing the city.

22.13. =13=Giffard, Mar. 11. Scott, Mems., ii, 422-5. Ballentine,

English Soldier, ii, 3-6. Davis, Autobiog., 140-1. Sen. 1; 30, 1,

pp. 223, 239. Balbontín, Estado, 53, 55. =65=Scott, gen. orders 33.

=12=Matson to commodore, Mar. 11, 25. Steele, Amer. Campaigns, i, 120.

N. Y. _Sun_, Aug. 16, 1847 (Scott should have left 5000 to reduce

V. Cruz). _So. Quart. Rev._, July, 1851. Sen. 1; 30, 1, pp. 47-9.

Oswandel, Notes, 101. Ho. 60; 30, 1, p. 892 (Conner). McCall, Letters,

483. Moore, Scott's Camp., 12.

22.14. This seems like a foolhardy performance; but other boats had

gone as near without being fired upon, and the _Petrita_ was supposed

to be out of range (_Mag. Am. Hist._, xiv, 567). The engineers intended

of course to get as near as they could with safety, and it is possible

that Scott wished to set an example of fearlessness. McCall, who was on

board, wrote that this occurred on Mar. 6; other accounts place it on

the seventh.

22.15. Just as the fleet was leaving Antón Lizardo, 800 Louisiana

volunteers arrived. These, with a shipload who came some hours later,

gave Scott upwards of 11,000 men. His =62=return of Mar. 25 included

13,470.

The War with Mexico, Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 31 / 72 段