CHAPTER VI.

PLEBEIANS, SLAVES, TENURE OF LANDS, AND TAXATION.

INFLUENCE OF THE COMMONERS--OPPRESSION BY NOBLES--DEPRIVED

OF OFFICE BY MONTEZUMA II.--CLASSES OF SLAVES--PENAL

SLAVES--VOLUNTARY SLAVERY--SLAVE MARKET AT

AZCAPUZALCO--PUNISHMENT AND PRIVILEGES OF SLAVES--DIVISION

OF LANDS--CROWN LANDS--LANDS OF THE NOBLES--MUNICIPAL

PROPERTY--PROPERTY OF THE TEMPLES--TENURE OF LANDS IN

ZAPOTECAPAN, MIZTECAPAN, MICHOACAN, TLASCALA, CHOLULA, AND

HUEXOTZINCO--SIMILARITY TO FEUDAL SYSTEM OF EUROPE--SYSTEM

OF TAXATION--MUNICIPAL TAXES--LICE TRIBUTE--TRIBUTE FROM

CONQUERED PROVINCES--REVENUE OFFICERS--INJUSTICE OF

MONTEZUMA II.

[Sidenote: PLEBEIANS AND SLAVES.]

No writer seems to have thought it worth while to define the exact

condition of the lower orders of free citizens among the Aztecs. In

Mexico, under the earlier kings, they appear to have enjoyed

considerable privileges. They were represented in the royal councils,

they held high offices at court and about the king's person, their

wishes were consulted in all affairs of moment, and they were

generally recognized as an important part of the community. Gradually,

however, their power lessened as that of the nobles increased, until,

in the time of Montezuma II., they were, as we have seen, deprived of

all offices that were not absolutely menial, and driven from the

palace. Still, there is no doubt that from the earliest times the

plebeians were always much oppressed by the nobles, or that, as the

Bishop of Santo Domingo, before quoted,[130] remarks, "they were, and

still are, so submissive that they allow themselves to be killed or

sold into slavery without complaining." Father Acosta, also, writes

that "so great is the authority which the caciques have assumed over

their vassals that these latter dare not open their lips to complain

of any order given them, no matter how difficult or disagreeable it

may be to fulfill; indeed, they would rather die and perish than incur

the wrath of their lord; for this reason the nobles frequently abuse

their power, and are often guilty of extortion, robbery, and violence

towards their vassals."[131] Camargo tells us that the plebeians were

content to work without pay for the nobles, if they could only insure

their protection by so doing.[132]

Of those who stood below the macehuales, as the plebeians were called,

and lowest of all in the social scale, the slaves, we have more

definite information. Slavery was enforced and recognized by law and

usage throughout the entire country inhabited by the Nahua nations.

There were in ancient Mexico three classes of slaves; namely,

prisoners of war, persons condemned for crime to lose their freedom,

and those who sold themselves, or children sold by their parents. The

captor of a prisoner of war had an undisputed right to doom his prize

to be sacrificed to the gods; this power he almost invariably exerted,

and it was held a punishable crime for another to deprive him of it by

rescuing the prisoner or setting him free.[133] Sahagun tells us that

the captor could, if he chose, either sell or hold his prisoners as

slaves; and if among them any man or woman showed unusual ability in

music, embroidering, weaving, or other domestic occupation, he or she

was frequently purchased by the king or some noble or wealthy man, and

employed in his house, and thus saved from the sacrifice.[134] The

offences which the Aztecs punished with slavery were the following:

firstly, failure on the part of any relation of a person convicted of

high treason, to give timely information of the plot to the proper

authorities, provided he or she had knowledge of it, the wives and

children of the traitor being also enslaved; secondly, the

unauthorized sale of a free man or woman or of a free child kidnapped

or found astray, the kidnapper fraudulently asserting such person to

be a slave, or such child to be his own; thirdly, the sale or

disposal, by a tenant or depositary, of another's property, without

the permission of the owner or his representative, or of a proper

legal authority; fourthly, hindering a collared slave from reaching

the asylum of the sovereign's palace, provided it was the act of one

who was not the owner or the owner's son; fifthly, stealing things of

value, or being an inveterate thief; sixthly, stealing from a field a

certain number of ears of corn or of useful plants, exception being

made to this law when the act was committed by a child under ten years

of age, or when the stolen property was paid for; seventhly, the

impregnating, by a free man, of another's female slave, if the woman

died during her pregnancy, or in consequence of it. This latter

statement is contradicted by Torquemada, upon the strength of

information given him, as he alleges, by Aztecs well acquainted with

the laws of their country.[135] Gomara asserts, though he allows that

others deny it, that when a man died insolvent, his son or his wife

became the property of his creditors.[136] Torquemada affirms that it

was customary for a creditor to look for payment of his claim to the

estate, real or personal, if any there was, but no member of the

debtor's family was awarded to him to cancel the debt.[137] It

sometimes happened that persons too poor to pay their taxes were put

up for sale, but this mostly occurred in conquered provinces. Penal

slaves did not become the property of the king or the state, but were

publicly sold to private persons, or assigned to the parties whom they

had injured; nor were such offenders held to be slaves, or their

punishment considered to have commenced until they had been formally

delivered to the new owner.

[Sidenote: PENAL AND VOLUNTARY SLAVERY.]

Among those who voluntarily surrendered their freedom for a

consideration, besides such as were driven by extreme poverty to do

so, were the indolent who would not trust to their own exertions for a

livelihood, gamesters, to obtain the wherewithal to satisfy their

passion for gambling,[138] and harlots, to provide themselves with

showy clothing and finery. The two latter classes were not obliged to

go into service until after the expiration of a year from the time of

receiving the consideration for which they sold themselves.

Slaves were continually offered for sale in the public market-place of

every town, but the principal slave-mart in the Mexican empire seems

to have been the town of Azcapuzalco, which was situated about two

leagues from the city of Mexico; it occupied the site of the ancient

capital of the Tepanec kingdom, which was destroyed by King

Nezahualcoyotl of Tezcuco. Great numbers of slaves were brought to

Azcapuzalco from all the provinces; and it is said that the merchants

who traded in them had to adopt great precautions to prevent their

property from being stolen or rescued on the journey. With a view to

advantageous sales the slaves thus exposed in the public markets were

kept well clothed and fed, and were forced to dance and look cheerful.

Parents could pawn, or sell a son as a slave, but were allowed to take

him back on surrendering another son to serve in his stead; on such

occasions the master was wont to show his generosity by allowing an

extra compensation for the new servant. There was yet another kind of

slavery, called by the Mexicans _huehuetlatlacolli_, meaning 'ancient

servitude.' When one or more families were entirely destitute and

famine-stricken, they sold a son to some noble, and bound themselves

to always 'keep that slave alive,' that is to say, to supply another

to fill his place if he died or became incapacitated. This obligation

was binding upon each member of the families making the contract, but

was null and void if the man who was actually serving died in his

master's house, or if his employer took from him anything that he had

lawfully acquired; therefore, to prevent this forfeiture of ownership,

the master neither took from his slave anything but personal service,

nor allowed him to dwell in his house. It frequently happened that as

many as four or five families were bound in this manner to supply a

noble and his heirs with a slave. But in 1505 or 1506, a year of

famine in the country, Nezahualpilli of Tezcuco, foreseeing the evils

that this system of perpetual contract would entail upon his subjects

if the scarcity of food continued long, repealed the law, and declared

all families exempt from its obligations; it is recorded that

Montezuma II. soon after followed his example.[139]

[Sidenote: CONDITION AND TREATMENT OF SLAVES.]

Slavery in Mexico was, according to all accounts, a moderate

subjection, consisting merely of an obligation to render personal

service, nor could that be exacted without allowing the slave a

certain amount of time to labor for his own advantage. Slaves were

kindly treated and were allowed far greater privileges than any in the

old world; they could marry and bring up families, hold property,

including other slaves to serve them, and their children were

invariably born free. There is, however, some obscurity on this point,

as Sahagun tells us that in the year Ce Tochtli, which came round

every fifty-two years, there was generally a great famine in the land,

and at that time many persons, driven to it by hunger, sold not only

themselves as slaves, but also their children and descendants for

countless generations.[140] Very young or poor slaves lived at the

home of their master, and were treated almost as members of the

family; the other slaves lived independently, either on their owner's

land, or upon their own. It frequently happened that a master

succumbed to the charms of one of his female slaves and made her his

wife, or that a comely bondman found favor in the sight of his

mistress, and became her lord; nor was this so strange as it may at

first appear, there being no difference of race or color to make such

alliances repugnant or shameful. Feelings of affection and respect

existed, as a rule, between master and servant. A slave who had served

long and faithfully was often entrusted with the stewardship of his

owner's household and property, and, on the other hand, if the master

through misfortune should become poor, his bondmen would cheerfully

labor for his support. No well-behaved slave could be sold without

his consent unless his owner could prove that poverty or debt made

such sale unavoidable; nor could such faults as laziness,

disobedience, or running away, be punished without due warning, which

the master for his own justification usually gave in the presence of

respectable witnesses. If after this had occurred two or three times

the slave continued refractory, a wooden collar was placed on his

neck, and then his master was authorized to transfer him against his

will. Purchasers of a collared slave always inquired how many times he

had been so disposed of before, and if after two or three such sales

he continued incorrigible, he could be sold for the sacrifice. But

even yet he has one chance left; if he can escape from his master's

premises and gain the courtyard of the royal palace, he not only

avoids punishment, but he is from that day forth a free man; moreover,

no person, save his owner or his owner's sons, is allowed in any

manner to prevent him from reaching the asylum, under penalty of being

made the slave of him whom he attempts to deprive of his chance for

freedom.

The sale of a slave was conducted with much formality, and must be

made in the presence of at least four respectable witnesses; in cases

of self-sale the witnesses acted as conscientious arbitrators to

secure the highest price and most favorable conditions for him who

sold himself. The usual price for an average slave was twenty mantles,

equivalent to one load of cotton cloth; some were worth less, while

others brought as many as forty mantles.

Slavery among the Nahua nations appears, then, to have been only a

partial deprivation of a freeman's rights. As a slave was permitted to

possess property and even other slaves of his own, and as his children

were born free and he had complete control of his own family, we can

scarcely say he lost his citizenship, although it is true he was not

eligible for public office. It was a common practice for a master

during his lifetime, or on his death-bed, to emancipate his slaves,

but if no such provision were made they went to the heirs with the

rest of the property. Murder of a slave, even by his master, was a

capital offence.

Yet in spite of all this testimony in favor of the mildness of slavery

among the Nahua nations, there is still room for some reasonable doubt

concerning the patriarchal character of the system; inasmuch as we are

told that many slaves, not mentioned as being prisoners of war or

criminals, as well as servants, dwarfs, or deformed persons, and

purchased children, were put to death at religious feasts and royal

funerals.[141]

* * * * *

[Sidenote: TENURE OF LANDS.]

The lands were divided between the crown, the nobility, the various

tribes or clans of the people, and the temples. The division, however,

was by no means equal, by far the greater portion being appropriated

by the king and the aristocracy.[142] All landed property was duly

surveyed, and each estate was accurately marked out on maps, or

paintings, kept on file by a competent officer in the district where

they were situated. The crown lands were painted in purple, those of

the nobility in scarlet, and those of the _calpullis_, or wards, in

light yellow. Certain portions of the crown property called

_tecpantlalli_, or 'lands of the palace,' were granted to nobles of

the rank of Tecuhtli, who were called _tecpanpouhque_ or

_tecpantlaca_, 'people of the palace.' They had the free use and

enjoyment of such lands, and in return certain services were expected

of them. It was their duty to attend to the repairs and proper

arrangement of the royal residences, and to cultivate and keep in

order the royal gardens, for all of which they had to provide the

necessary number of workmen; besides this they were obliged to wait on

the king and accompany him whenever he appeared in public. Although in

consideration of these services the 'people of the palace' paid no

rent, yet the eminent domain of their lands was vested in the

sovereign. When one of them died his eldest son inherited his

privileges, subject to the same obligations, but if he changed his

residence to another part of the country, or died without male issue,

the usufruct was forfeited and the land reverted to the sovereign, who

transferred it to another usufructuary, or left the choice of one to

the community in whose district the property was situated.[143] The

produce of other lands belonging to the crown was set apart for the

support of the royal household, and for benevolent purposes.

[Sidenote: LANDED PROPERTY OF THE NOBLES.]

In conquered provinces, the habits and customs and established form of

government of the vanquished were usually respected. The sovereigns of

Anáhuac retained the native princes in power, and allowed the people

to keep their property; but they invariably set apart a certain part

of the territory, proportioned to the conquest, which became the

property of the conquering monarch. These lands, called _yaotlalli_,

which means 'war lands,' were cultivated by the conquered people for

the benefit of their conqueror. If they belonged to Mexico their name

was _mexica-tlalli_; if to Acolhuacan, _acolhua-tlalli_, and so

on.[144]

[Sidenote: INHERITANCE OF ESTATES.]

The lands of the nobility were called _pillalli_, and were either

ancient possessions of the nobles transmitted by inheritance from

father to son, or were rewards of valor granted by the king. They were

held by various tenures; some of them could be alienated at the will

of the owner, subject only to the restriction that they should not

pass into the hands of a plebeian; others were entailed upon the

eldest male issue and could not be otherwise disposed of. Many of the

Aztec estates were of very ancient origin. After the Chichimecs

obtained undisputed possession of the valley of Mexico, their chief or

sovereign Xolotl made grants of land to his own people, and to others

who acknowledged him as their supreme lord, under the condition that

the grantees should render service to the crown with their persons,

vassals, and estates, whenever he should require it of them, and the

same policy was adopted by his successors.[145] Sons generally

inherited their father's estates by right of primogeniture, but if the

eldest son was judged incapable of taking proper care of the property,

the father left it to whichever son he pleased, stipulating, however,

that the heir should insure a competency to him he had supplanted.[146]

In the republic of Tlascala daughters could not inherit an estate,

the object being to prevent landed property from going into the hands

of strangers. In the kingdoms of Mexico, Tezcuco, and Tlacopan it is

probable that the law was the same in this respect, but the

authorities give us no information concerning the matter.[147] These

feudatories paid no rent for their lands, but were bound to assist

their suzerain, the king, with their persons, vassals, and fortunes in

all cases of foreign or civil war. Each king, on his accession,

confirmed the investiture of estates derived from the crown.[148] The

lands of the people were called _calpulli_, and every city was divided

into as many of these as there were wards in it, and the whole number

of calpulli being collectively named _altepatlalli_. The calpulli, as

well as the _tlaxicalli_, or streets, were all measured out and their

boundaries marked, so that the inhabitants of one ward or street could

not invade the possessions of another. Each of these divisions

belonged to its respective community, and was of greater or less

extent and importance according to the partition which had been made

by the first settlers in Anáhuac. The owners of a calpulli were all

members of the same clan or tribe, and their district bore their name.

The right of tenure was perpetual and inalienable, and was the common

property of the community and not of individuals. Any member of the

community not possessed of any land, had the right to ask for a

portion suitable to his position and requirements, which was granted

him. This portion he was entitled to hold as long as he cultivated and

improved it, and he could transmit it to his heirs; he had no

authority to sell his portion, but he could let it to another for a

number of years. If he neglected to cultivate it for two years the

head man of the calpulli remonstrated with him; if he paid no heed to

this warning he was ousted the following year in favor of some other

person; a reasonable excuse for such neglect was, however, always

accepted. If the land assigned to anyone proved unfruitful and barren,

he was at liberty to abandon it and another portion was granted him.

Under no pretext whatever could any person settle upon the land

lawfully occupied by another, nor could the authorities of the

calpulli deprive the latter of his right. If a land-owner died without

heirs, his portion was considered vacant and assigned to the first

applicant for it. If a calpulli was in great need the authorities were

allowed to lease its lands, but under no circumstances were the

inhabitants permitted to work on the lands of another district. The

elders of the tribe formed the council of the calpulli; this body

elected a principal, called _calpullec_, whose duty it was to watch

over the interests of the community; he acted only with the advice and

consent of the council. Each city set apart a piece of land in the

suburbs wherefrom to supply the needs of the army in time of war.

These portions were called _milchimalli_, or _cacalomilli_, according

to the kind of grain they produced, and were cultivated jointly by all

the calpullis. It was not unusual for the kings to make a life-grant

of a portion of the people's property to some favorite noble, for

though there is no doubt that the calpulli lands of right belonged to

the people, yet in this respect as in others, the kings were wont to

usurp a power not their own.[149] Every temple, great and

insignificant, had its own lands and country estates, the produce of

which was applied to the support of the priests and of public worship;

the tenants who occupied these lands were looked upon as vassals of

the temples. The chief priests, who, on the temple lands, exercised a

power similar to that of the royal governors, frequently visited these

estates to inspect their condition and to administer justice to their

tenants. The temple of Huitzilopochtli was considered the wealthiest

in Mexico. Torquemada says that in Tezcuco fifteen large cities

furnished the temples of that kingdom with wood, provisions, and other

necessaries.[150] Clavigero makes the number of towns twenty-nine.[151]

Throughout Zapotecapan and Miztecapan landed property was invariably

transmitted from male to male, females being excluded from the

succession. No one had the right to sell his land in perpetuity; the

law forbade its transfer out of a family either by marriage or

otherwise; and if a proprietor was compelled by the force of necessity

to dispose of his real estate, it returned after the lapse of some

years to his son or his nearest relative, who paid to the holder the

consideration for which it had been pledged or its equivalent.[152] In

Miztecapan the first-born son, before taking possession of his

inheritance, had to do penance for a year; he was confined in a

religious house, clothed in rags, daubed with India-rubber juice, and

his face and body rubbed with fetid herbs; during that time he had to

draw blood repeatedly from his body and limbs, and was subjected to

hard labor and privation. At the expiration of the year he was washed

with odorous water by four girls, and then conducted by friends to his

house with great pomp and festivity.[153]

[Sidenote: ESTATES IN MICHOACAN.]

Early writers say nothing about the tenure of lands among the Tarascos

of Michoacan, but merely state in general terms that the sovereign's

power over the lives and property of his subjects was unlimited.[154]

The tenure of lands in the republic of Tlascala had its origin in the

division made at the time when the country was first settled; which

was as follows: Any Tecuhtli who established an entail, called

_teccalli_, or _pilcalli_, took for his own use the best and largest

part of the lands that fell to his lot or were awarded to him in the

partition, including woods, springs, rivers, and lakes; of the

remainder a fair division was made among his servitors and vassals,

or, in other words, his soldiers, friends, and kinsmen. All were bound

to keep the manor-house in repair and to supply their lord with game,

flowers, and other comforts, and he in his turn, was expected to

entertain, protect, and feed them in his house. To these kinsmen,

friends, and servitors, was given the name of _teixhuihuan_, meaning

the 'grand-children of the manor-house.' In this manner all the nobles

divided their land. All were greatly respected by their vassals. They

derived their income from the taxes that their tenants paid them out

of what they obtained from the chase, from the soil, and by raising

domestic animals.[155]

No information has reached us respecting the provisions under which

land was held in Cholula and Huexotzinco, or among the Totonacs. In

the province of Pánuco, the eldest son was the sole inheritor of land

and, therefore, the only one that paid tribute; the other sons had to

rent land from those who were in possession of it.[156]

There can be no doubt that in all this there is, as so many writers

have observed, a strong resemblance to the feudal systems of Europe.

The obligation of military service, and other relations of lord and

vassal smack strongly of the institutions of the Middle Ages, but, as

Mr Prescott says, the minor points of resemblance "fall far short of

that harmonious system of reciprocal service and protection, which

embraced, in nice gradation, every order of a feudal monarchy. The

kingdoms of Anáhuac were, in their nature, despotic, attended, indeed,

with many mitigating circumstances, unknown to the despotisms of the

East; but it is chimerical to look for much in common--beyond a few

accidental forms and ceremonies--with those aristocratic institutions

of the Middle Ages, which made the court of every petty baron the

precise image in miniature of that of his sovereign." I have no

inclination to draw analogies, believing them, at least in a work of

this kind, to be futile; and were I disposed to do so, space would not

permit it. Nations in their infancy are almost as much alike as are

human beings in their earlier years, and in studying these people I am

struck at every turn by the similarity between certain of their

customs and institutions and those of other nations; comparisons might

be happily drawn between the division of lands in Anáhuac and that

made by Lycurgus and Numa in Laconia and Rome, or between the

relations of Aztec master and slave and those of Roman patron and

client, for the former were nearly as mild as the latter; but the list

of such comparisons would never be complete, and I am fain to leave

them to the reader.

[Sidenote: SYSTEM OF TAXATION.]

The people of Anáhuac and of the surrounding countries paid taxes to

the crown and to the temples, either with personal service or with the

productions or results of their labor; in short, with everything

useful. We have seen that in the kingdom of Tezcuco twenty-nine cities

were appointed to provide the king's household with everything

requisite of food, furniture, and so forth, and were, consequently,

exempt from all other taxes. Fourteen of these cities served in this

manner during one half of the year, and fifteen during the other half.

They likewise furnished the workingmen and laborers, such as

water-carriers, sweepers, tillers of the palace lands, and gardeners.

Boys who were too young to do men's work were required to provide

annually four hundred armfuls of wood for the fires which were kept up

day and night in the principal rooms of the palace. The young men of

Tollantzinco, either themselves or through their servants supplied

fine rushes for mats, stools, or seats, called _icpalli_, pine-wood

splinters for lighting fires, other wood for torches, _acayetl_, or

pipes with tobacco, various kinds of dyes, liquid amber both in cakes

and in vessels, copal incense in their golden cylinders, and a large

quantity of other articles, which it is unnecessary to specify.[157]

Manufacturers paid their taxes with the objects produced by their

industry. Journeymen mechanics, such as carpenters, masons, workers in

feathers and precious metals, and musicians, were, according to

Oviedo, exempt from such tax, and in lieu thereof rendered personal

service to the sovereign without remuneration.[158] Merchants paid

their taxes with such articles as they traded in. The last class of

tribute-payers were the _tlamaitl_, tenants attached to a nobleman's

land, who tilled the same for their own benefit. They were obliged to

do a certain amount of work every year for the landlord, and to render

military service when it was required of them by the sovereign.

Brasseur says that these tenants paid no tribute to the king, but his

statement is contradicted by Clavigero.[159] Taxes paid in fruit and

grain were collected immediately after harvest; other tributes were

collected at different times through the year. In each town there was

a magazine for storing the revenues, from which supplies were drawn as

required. In the vicinity of Mexico it was customary to convey the

agricultural produce into the capital, in order that the inhabitants,

who, being surrounded with the waters of the lake, had no land of

their own to cultivate, might be regularly supplied with food. There

was no uniform system of collecting taxes from the merchants and

manufacturers. Payments were made by them in accordance with their

circumstances and the nature of the articles they contributed. There

were about three hundred and seventy tributary towns in the Mexican

empire, some of which paid their taxes every twenty days, and some

every four days, while others only did so once in six months, or even

only once a year. The people of Tlatelulco, says Purchas,[160] "were

charged for tribute, alwayes to repaire the Church called Huiznahuac.

Item, fortie great Baskets (of the bignesse of half a Bushell) of

cacao ground, with the Meale of Maiz (which they called

_Chianpinoli_,) and euery Basket had sixteene hundred Almonds of

Cacao. Item, other fortie Baskets of Chianpinoli. Item, eight hundred

burthens of great Mantels. Item, eightie pieces of Armour, of slight

Feathers, and as many Targets of the same Feathers, of the deuices &

colours as they are pictured. All the which tribute, except the said

armes and targets they gaue euery 24. dayes,[161] and the said armes

and targets they gaue for tribute but once in the whole yeere. The

said tribute had his beginning since the time of Quauhtlatoa and

Moquihuix, which were Lords of Tlatilulco. The Lords of Mexico, which

first enioyned to those of Tlatilulco, to pay tribute, and to

acknowledge their subiection, were Yzcoatçi and Axiacaçi." Sometimes

merchants' guilds or individuals did not pay their taxes at the

regular assessment of the town in which they lived, but did so

according to prior arrangement made with the revenue officers.

[Sidenote: TAXES PAID BY CITIES.]

[Sidenote: TAXES PAID IN VERMIN.]

In addition to the taxes levied upon private individuals, each town

contributed a large number of cotton garments, with a certain quantity

of breadstuffs and feathers and such other productions as were a

specialty of the province in which it was situated. Mazatlan,

Xoconocho, Huehuetlan, and other towns on the Pacific coast, paid,

besides the cotton garments, four thousand bundles of fine feathers of

divers colors, two hundred sacks of cocoa, forty tiger-skins, and one

hundred and sixty birds of a certain species. Coyolapan,

Atlacuechahuaxan, Huaxyacac, and other towns of the Zapotecs, forty

pieces of gold of a specified size, and twenty sacks of cochineal.

Tlachquiauhco, Ayotlan, and Teotzapotlan, twenty vessels of a fixed

size filled with gold dust. Tochtepec, Otlatitlan, Cozamalloapan,

Michapan and other places on the gulf of Mexico, besides cotton

garments, cocoa, and gold, paid twenty-four thousand bundles of

exquisite feathers of various qualities and colors, six necklaces, two

of which were of the finest emerald, and four of the commoner

description, twenty ear-rings of amber set in gold, and an equal

number made of crystal rock, one hundred pots of liquid amber, and

sixteen thousand loads of India-rubber. Tepeyacac, Quecholac,

Tecamachalco, Acatzinco and other towns of that region of country,

each contributed four thousand sacks of lime, four thousand loads of

solid reed for building purposes, with as many of smaller reed for

making darts, and eight thousand loads of reeds filled with aromatic

substances. Malinaltepec, Tlalcozauhtitlan, Olinallan, Ichcatlan,

Qualac, and other southern towns situated in the warm region, paid

each six hundred measures of honey, forty large jars of yellow ochre

for paint, one hundred and sixty copper shields, forty round plates of

gold of fixed dimensions, ten small measures of fine turquoises, and

one load of smaller turquoises. Quauhnahuac, Panchimalco,

Atlacholoayan, Xiuhtepec, Huitzilac, and other towns of the Tlahuicas,

paid each sixteen thousand large leaves of paper, and four thousand

_xicalli_, or gourds, of different sizes. Quauhtitlan, Tehuilloyocan,

and other neighboring towns, each gave eight thousand mats and eight

thousand _icpalli_, or stools. Some cities paid their taxes with

fire-wood, stone, and beams for building; others with copal-gum;

others sent to the royal houses and forests a certain number of birds

and animals, such as Xilotepec, Michmaloyan, and other cities of the

Otomís, which were each compelled to furnish yearly forty live eagles

to the king. After the Matlaltzincas were made subject to the Mexican

crown by King Axayacatl, they were required not only to pay a heavy

tax in kind, but also to keep under cultivation a field of seven

hundred _toesas_[162] by three hundred and fifty, for the benefit of

the army. As the Saxon king imposed a tax of wolves' heads upon his

subjects for the purpose of ridding his kingdom of those ravenous

animals, so did the Mexican monarchs exact from those who were too

poor to pay the regular taxes a certain quantity of snakes, scorpions,

centipedes and other obnoxious creatures. Lice, especially, were

contributed in large numbers in Mexico.[163] It is related that soon

after Cortés arrived in the city of Mexico, certain cavaliers of his

force, among whom were Alonso de Ojeda and Alonso de Mata, were

roaming through the royal palace, admiring its great extent and all

its wonders, doubtless with an eye to plunder, when they came across

some bags, filled with some soft, fine, and weighty material; never

doubting but that it must be valuable, they hastened to untie the

mouth of one of the sacks, when to their disgust and disappointment

they found its contents to consist of nothing but lice, which, as they

afterwards ascertained, had been paid as tribute by the poor.[164]

Duties were levied upon property, manufactures, and articles exposed

for sale in the market-places, in proportion to the wealth of the

person taxed or the value of the merchandise sold. Produce and

merchandise of every description, carried into the city of Mexico, was

subject to toll duties, which were paid into the royal treasury.

The proportion in which taxes were paid is stated at from thirty to

thirty-three per cent., or about one third of everything made and

produced. Oviedo affirms that each taxpayer, in addition to one third

of his property, delivered one out of every three of his children, or

in lieu thereof a slave, for the sacrifice; if he failed to do this he

forfeited his own life.[165]

The government had in the head town of each province large warehouses

for the storage of breadstuffs and merchandise received by the

tax-gatherers; also auditing offices to which the _calpixques_, or

stewards of the revenue, were required to render a very strict account

of their collections, and such as were convicted of embezzlement, were

immediately put to death and their property confiscated.[166] In the

royal treasury were paintings by which were recorded the tributary

towns, and the quantity and kind of tribute paid by each. In the Codex

Mendoza may be seen thirty-six such paintings, each one of which

represents the principal towns of one or of several provinces of the

empire, together with the quantity and quality of the taxes and the

time when they were paid.[167]

The personal and ordinary service consisted in providing every day the

water and wood needed at the chiefs' houses; this was distributed from

day to day among the towns or wards, and thus each individual was

occupied in rendering such service once or twice in the year at the

utmost. Residents in the vicinity were the only ones so subjected, and

then, in consideration of such service, were exempted from paying a

portion of the imposts. Other labor was mostly done by slaves, of whom

there were large numbers. Foreign provinces subjected by the empire

without having made any resistance, were not required to pay a fixed

tribute, but sent several times in the year whatever they thought

proper, as a present to the king, who showed himself more or less

gracious according to the value of the presents. No calpixques or

tax-gatherers were placed in such provinces by the Mexican sovereign,

but they continued under the rule of their own chiefs. Such countries

as were reduced by war, had to submit to the rigorous conditions

imposed by the conqueror, and bore the name of _tequitin tlacotl_,

which means 'paying tribute like slaves.' Over them were stationed

stewards and calpixques, who had authority even over the lords of the

country, and who besides recovering the tributes forced men to

cultivate land, and women to spin, weave, and embroider for their

private benefit; indeed, so great was their tyranny, that whatever

they coveted they were sure to obtain by fair means or foul. The kings

of Tezcuco and Tlacopan, and other sovereign lords, allies of the king

of Mexico, shared these tributes if they aided in the conquest.[168]

[Sidenote: TAXATION UNDER MONTEZUMA II.]

The sovereigns selected the calpixques from among the Aztec _pilli_,

or nobles of inferior rank. They were under the supervision of the

chief treasurers or _hueycalpixques_, who resided at the several

capitals, and it was their duty to gather the tributes or taxes, and

to see that the lands belonging to the municipalities or to private

persons were kept under cultivation. The duties of these calpixques

were not very arduous at first, as the people generally hastened to

pay their taxes before being called upon; but during the reign of

Montezuma II. the taxes increased so enormously, owing to the great

extravagance of the court, that this commendable zeal cooled down very

considerably. The bulk of the immense wealth which the conquerors saw

with so much admiration at Montezuma's court was the result of this

excessive taxation, and it was one of the main causes of that

alienation of the people from their sovereign which rendered the

conquest a possible achievement. Notwithstanding the easy disposition

of the taxpayers, they could not submit patiently to a yoke so

onerous. The merchants, whose trading expeditions had been so useful

to the state in former times, were no less overwhelmed by the taxes

than the inhabitants of conquered provinces by the tributes. It was

among that powerful class that the first symptoms of defection were

noticed. To the main grievance was added the tyranny and harshness

exhibited by the revenue officers in collecting the taxes. They

carried a small rod in one hand and a feather fan in the other, and,

accompanied by a large retinue of understrappers, went through cities

and fields, unmercifully maltreating the unfortunate beings who could

not promptly comply with their demands, and even selling them into

slavery; at least it is certain that such sales occurred in conquered

provinces.

[Sidenote: SELFISHNESS OF MONTEZUMA II.]

From the first years of his reign Montezuma II. began to oppress the

merchants with heavy taxation, even upon the most trifling things. The

greatest sufferers were the retail dealers, who had to pay excessive

duties upon the merchandise they introduced into the principal

_tianguez_, or market-place, from which such merchandise was taken to

the lesser market-places. But the king and his creatures finding that

this did not directly injure the wholesale traders, among whom were

the judges of the mercantile court,--that is to say, the consuls and

syndics, so to name them, of the company of Tlatelulco,--witnesses

were soon found to trump up charges of high treason against them,

which ended in their being put to death, and their goods and chattels

confiscated and distributed among the people of the royal household. A

very large portion of the taxes and tributes was expended in

supporting the army, the public employees, the poor and destitute,

such as widows, orphans, and the aged, and also in providing food for

the people in times of great scarcity, but almost as large a portion

was appropriated by the king to his own uses.[169] It was by such

acts as these that Montezuma II. undid the work of his fathers, and

spoiled the harmony of his realm by caring only for his own glory and

that of his court.

FOOTNOTES:

[130] See page 191 of this volume.

[131] _Acosta_, _De procuranda, indorum salute_; quoted in _Pimentel_,

_Mem. sobre la Raza Indígena_, p. 81.

[132] _Hist. Tlax._, in _Nouvelles Annales des Voy._, 1843, tom.

xcix., p. 130.

[133] _Clavigero_, _Storia Ant. del Messico_, tom. ii., pp. 134-6;

_Cortés_, _Carta Inéd._, in _Icazbalceta_, _Col. de Doc._, tom. i., p.

474.

[134] _Hist. Gen._, tom. i., lib. i., pp. 32-3; see also, tom. ii.,

lib. vii., pp. 258-9, lib. ix., pp. 353, 370. The Anonymous Conqueror

agrees with Sahagun: 'Tutti quei che si pigliauano nella guerra, ò

erano màgiati da loro, ò erano tenuti per schiaui.' _Relatione fatta

per vn gentil'huomo del Signor Fernando Cortese_, in _Ramusio_,

_Navigationi_, tom. iii., fol. 304. Motolinia, however, asserts that

_all_ prisoners of war were sacrificed: 'por que ningun esclavo se

hacian en ellas, ni rescataban ninguno de los que en las guerras

prendian, mas todos los guardavan para sacrificar.' _Carta al

Emperador Cárlos V._, Jan. 2, 1555, in _Icazbalceta_, _Col. de Doc._,

tom. i., p. 272. Gomara also confirms this with a grim joke: 'Los

catiuos en guerra no siruian de esclauos, sino de sacrificados: y no

hazian mas de comer para ser comidos.' _Conq. Mex._, fol. 320-1; see

also fol. 309.

[135] 'Algunos quisieron decir, que si vn libre tenia acceso à alguna

Esclava, y quedaba preñada de la copula, era Esclavo el Varon que

cometiò acto con Esclava, y servia al Señor de la Esclava; pero esto

no fue asi, segun confesion de los mismos Indios Sabios, que sabian

sus Leies, y las practicaban.' _Monarq. Ind._, tom. ii., p. 566.

[136] _Conq. Mex._, fol. 320.

[137] _Monarq. Ind._, tom. ii., p. 566.

[138] _Duran_, _Hist. Indias_, MS., tom. iii., cap. xxii., xxiii.

[139] _Torquemada_, _Monarq. Ind._, tom. ii., pp. 564-5; _Sahagun_,

_Hist. Gen._, tom. ii., lib. viii., p. 303. Brasseur de Bourbourg

asserts that these contracts remained in force down to the time of the

Spanish conquest. _Hist. Nat. Civ._, tom. iii., p. 611.

[140] 'Y cuando acontecia la dicha hambre, entónces se vendian por

esclavos muchos pobres hombres y mugeres, y comprábanlos los ricos que

tenian muchas provisiones allegadas, y no solamente los dichos pobres

se vendian a sí mismos, sino que tambien vendian á sus hijos, y á sus

descendientes, y á todo su linaje, y así eran esclavos perpetuamente,

porque decian que esta servidumbre que se cobraba en tal tiempo, no

tenia remedio para acabarse en algun tiempo, porque sus padres se

habian vendido por escapar de la muerte, ó por librar su vida de la

última necesidad.' _Hist. Gen._, tom. ii., lib. vii., pp. 258-9.

[141] 'Vendian niños recien nacidos, y de dos años, para cumplir sus

promesas, y ofrecer en los templos, como nosotros las candelas, y

sacrificarlos para alcançar sus pretensiones.' _Herrera_, _Hist.

Gen._, dec. ii., lib. vi., cap. xvi. 'Porque como andaban todos los

Reinos, con sus mercancias, traìan de todos ellos muchos esclavos, los

quales, si no eran todos, à lo menos, los mas, sacrificaban.'

_Torquemada_, _Monarq. Ind._, tom. ii., p. 272. 'Porque casi todos los

que sacrificaban á los idolos eran los que prendian en las guerras ...

mui poquitos eran los otros que sacrificavan.' _Motolinia_, _Carta al

Emperador Cárlos V._, Jan. 2, 1555, in _Icazbalceta_, _Col. de Doc._,

tom. i., pp. 264, 272. 'Luego proponian un parlamento á los esclavos,

enanos y corcobados, diciendo: hijos mios, id á la buena ventura con

vuestro señor Axayaca á la otra vida.... Luego le abrieron el pecho,

teniendolo seis ó siete sacerdotes, y el mayoral le sacaba el corazon,

y todo el dia y toda la noche ardía el cuerpo del rey, con los

corazones de los miserables esclabos que morian sin culpa.'

_Tezozomoc_, _Crónica Mex._, in _Kingsborough's Mex. Antiq._, vol.

ix., pp. 90, 142. 'Sacrificando en sus honras doscientos esclavos, y

cien esclavas.' _Ixtlilxochitl_, _Hist. Chichimeca_, in _Id._, pp.

282, 250. 'Quando moria algun principal, matavan juntamente con él un

esclavo, y enterravan con él para que le fuese á servir.' _Codex

Telleriano-Remensis_, in _Id._, vol. v., p. 130. 'Avec lui, de jeunes

filles, des esclaves et des bossus.' _Camargo_, _Hist. Tlax._, in

_Nouvelles Annales des Voy._, 1843, tom. xcviii., p. 202. 'Se quemaba

junto con sus cuerpos y con los corazones de los cautivos y esclavos

que mataban.' _Leon y Gama_, _Dos Piedras_, p. 35; _Brasseur de

Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat. Civ._, tom. iii., pp. 453, 573-4; _Veytia_,

_Hist. Ant. Mej._, tom. iii., pp. 6, 8; _Pimentel_, _Mem. sobre la

Raza Indígena_, p. 65; Among those who in later times have treated of

slavery among the Nahua nations are the following: _Montanus_, _Nieuwe

Weereld_, p. 261; _Dapper_, _Neue Welt_, p. 294; _Chevalier_, _Mex.,

Ancien et Mod._, p. 62; _Bussierre_, _L'Empire Mex._, pp. 155-6;

_Müller_, _Amerikanische Urreligionen_, p. 541; _Klemm_,

_Cultur-Geschichte_, pp. 69-70; _Soden_, _Spanier in Peru_, tom. ii.,

pp. 14-15; _Simon's Ten Tribes_, p. 273.

[142] _Toribio and Olarte_, in _Ternaux-Compans_, _Voy._, série i.,

tom. x., p. 405.

[143] _Torquemada_, _Monarq. Ind._, tom. ii., pp. 545-6; _Clavigero_,

_Storia Ant. del Messico_, tom. ii., p. 122.

[144] _Zurita_, _Rapport_, in _Ternaux-Compans_, _Voy._, série ii.,

tom. i., p. 67; _Brasseur de Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat. Civ._, tom. iii.,

p. 603; _Carbajal_, _Discurso_, p. 61; _Tezozomoc_, _Crónica Mex._, in

_Kingsborough's Mex. Antiq._, tom. ix., p. 40.

[145] _Boturini_, _Idea_, p. 165; _Ixtlilxochitl_, _Hist. Chich._, in

_Kingsborough's Mex. Antiq._, vol. ix., pp. 208, 216, 224-5, 241;

_Id._, _Relaciones_, in _Id._, pp. 339-43, 346, 353, 386-7, 395, 451,

453; _Heredia y Sarmiento_, _Sermon_, MS., pp. 51-2; _Veytia_, _Hist.

Ant. Mej._, tom. iii., p. 189; _Vetancvrt_, _Teatro, Mex._, pt ii.,

pp. 13-14.

[146] Herrera, _Hist. Gen._, dec. ii., lib. vi., cap. xvii., says that

brothers inherited estates and not sons; but this assertion is not

borne out by any other authority.

[147] _Torquemada_, _Monarq. Ind._, tom. ii., p. 348; _Clavigero_,

_Storia Ant. del Messico_, tom. ii., p. 123.

[148] _Fuenleal_, _Lettre_, in _Ternaux-Compans_, _Voy._, série i.,

tom. x., pp. 252-4; _Cortés_, _Cartas_, p. 68; _Witt_, _Lettre_, in

_Ternaux-Compans_, _Voy._, série ii., tom. v., p. 287; _Carbajal_,

_Discurso_, p. 63; _Oviedo_, _Hist. Gen._, tom. iii., p. 535;

_Torquemada_, _Monarq. Ind._, tom. i., p. 231; _Zurita_, _Rapport_, in

_Ternaux-Compans_, _Voy._, série ii., tom. i., pp. 48-9, 65;

_Clavigero_, _Storia Ant. del Messico_, tom. ii., pp. 122-4; _Gomara_,

_Conq. Mex._, fol. 304; _Vetancvrt_, _Teatro, Mex._, pt ii., pp.

53-4.

[149] 'Ce n'est pas qu'ils eussent ces terres en propre; car, comme

les seigneurs exerçaient un pouvoir tyrannique, ils disposaient des

terrains et des vassaux suivant leur bon plaisir. Les Indiens

n'étaient donc, proprement dit, ni propriétaires ni maîtres de ces

villages; ils n'étaient que les laboureurs ou les amodiateurs des

seigneurs terriers, de telle façon que l'on pourrait dire que tout le

territoire, soit des plaines, soit des montagnes, dépendait du caprice

des seigneurs et qu'il leur appartenait, puisqu'ils y exerçaient un

pouvoir tyrannique, et que les Indiens vivaient au jour le jour; les

seigneurs partageant entre eux tous leurs produits.' _Simancas_, _De

l'Ordre de Succession_, in _Ternaux-Compans_, _Voy._, série i., tom.

x., pp. 224-5; _Zurita_, _Rapport_, in _Id._, série ii., tom. i., pp.

51-7; _Fuenleal_, _Lettre_, in _Id._, tom. v., p. 221; _Brasseur de

Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat. Civ._, tom. iii., pp. 603-7; _Carbajal

Espinosa_, _Hist. Mex._, tom. i., p. 590; _Variedades Civ._, tom. i.,

pp. 158-9; _Pimentel_, _Mem. sobre la Raza Indígena_, pp. 35-6;

_Bussierre_, _L'Empire Mex._, pp. 153-5.

[150] _Monarq. Ind._, tom. ii., p. 164.

[151] _Clavigero_, _Storia Ant. del Messico_, tom. ii., p. 36. See

further: _Las Casas_, _Hist. Apologética_, MS., cap. 141; _Brasseur de

Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat. Civ._, tom. iii., pp. 558-9; _Carbajal_,

_Discurso_, p. 36; _Soden_, _Spanier in Peru_, tom. ii., p. 13;

_Dillon_, _Hist. Mex._, p. 43; _Chevalier_, _Mex., Ancien et Mod._,

pp. 117-18.

[152] _Burgoa_, _Geog. Descrip._, tom. i., pt ii., fol. 188;

_Brasseur de Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat. Civ._, tom. iii., pp. 39-40.

[153] _Clavigero_, _Storia Ant. del Messico_, tom. ii., p. 54;

_Klemm_, _Cultur-Geschichte_, tom. v., pp. 95-6.

[154] _Beaumont_, _Crón. Mechoacan_, MS., p. 52.

[155] _Camargo_, _Hist. Tlax._, in _Nouvelles Annales des Voy._, 1843,

tom. xcviii., p. 176; _Torquemada_, _Monarq. Ind._, tom. i., pp.

276-7.

[156] _Witt_, _Lettre_, in _Ternaux-Compans_, _Voy._, série ii., tom.

v., p. 289.

[157] _Ixtlilxochitl_, _Hist. Chich._, in _Kingsborough's Mex.

Antiq._, vol. ix., p. 241-2.

[158] _Hist. Gen._, tom. iii., pp. 535, 305-6.

[159] 'Nè i Vasalli de' Feudatari erano esenti da' tributi, che

pagavano al Re gli altri Vassalli della Corona.' _Clavigero_, _Storia

Ant. del Messico_, tom. ii., pp. 122-7.

[160] _His Pilgrimes_, vol. iv., p. 1080.

[161] In the _Codex Mendoza_, in _Kingsborough's Mex. Antiq._, vol.

v., p. 54, we read that it was paid every eighty days.

[162] The toesa is the same thing as the French toise, which is 6.3945

English feet, or seven Castilian feet.

[163] _Tezozomoc_, _Crónica Mex._, in _Kingsborough's Mex. Antiq._,

tom. ix., pp. 17-18; _Torquemada_, _Monarq. Ind._, tom. i., p. 206;

_Clavigero_, _Storia Ant. del Messico_, tom. i., p. 275; _Zuazo_,

_Carta_, in _Icazbalceta_, _Col. de Doc._, tom. i., p. 366; _Cortés_,

_Hist. N. España_, p. 173.

[164] Torquemada adds: 'Ai quien diga, que no eran Piojos, sino

Gusanillos; pero Alonso de Ojeda en sus Memoriales, lo certifica de

vista, y lo mismo Alonso de Mata.' _Monarq. Ind._, tom. i., p. 461.

[165] 'Dábanle sus vassallos en tributo ordinario de tres hijos uno, y

el que no tenia hijos avia de dar un indio ó india para sacrificar á

sus dioses, é si no lo daban, avian de sacrificarle á él.' _Oviedo_,

_Hist. Gen._, tom. iii., p. 502. Nowhere else do I find mention of

such a custom, although in Michoacan the despotic power of the king,

and his tyrannous abuse of it, led to almost the same results. In

Michoacan: 'Tributauan al Rey quanto tenian y el queria, hasta las

mugeres y hijos, si los queria; de manera que eran mas que esclauos, y

viuian en terrible seruidumbre.' _Herrera_, _Hist. Gen._, dec. iii.,

lib. iii., cap. x., dec. ii., lib. vii., cap. xiii. 'Si bien todas las

atenciones dedicadas á los decorosos mugeriles privilegios destruian

la sujecion del tributo á sus Monarcas, sirviendolos en la ceguedad de

ofrecerles no solo la hacienda, y la vida, sino á sus proprias

mugeres, en caso de discurrir aceptable el vergonzoso obsequio.'

_Salazar y Olarte_, _Hist. Conq. Mex._, tom. ii., pp. 69-70.

[166] _Sahagun_, _Hist. Gen._, tom. ii., lib. viii., p. 307.

[167] _Codex Mendoza_, in _Purchas his Pilgrimes_, vol. iv., pp.

1080-1101; _Id._, in _Kingsborough's Mex. Antiq._, vol. v., pp. 54-89,

vol. i., plates xix-lvii; _Cortés_, _Hist. N. España_, p. 176;

_Cortés_, _Cartas_, p. 110.

[168] _Tápia_, _Relacion_, in _Icazbalceta_, _Col. de Doc._, tom. ii.,

p. 592.

[169] _Torquemada_, _Monarq. Ind._, tom. i., pp. 147, 206, 231, 461,

tom. ii., pp. 545-7, 560; _Gomara_, _Conq. Mex._, fol. 111-13; _Las

Casas_, _Hist. Apologética_, MS., cap. cxli.; _Toribio and Olarte_, in

_Ternaux-Compans_, _Voy._, série i., tom. x., pp. 401-8; _Fuenleal_,

in _Id._, pp. 244-54; _Chaves_, _Rapport_, in _Id._, série ii., tom.

v., p. 301; _Simancas_, in _Id._, série i., tom. x., pp. 229-31;

_Camargo_, _Hist. Tlax._, in _Nouvelles Annales des Voy._, 1843, tom.

xcviii., pp. 180, 198-9; _Witt_, _Lettre_ in _Ternaux-Compans_, _Voy._,

série ii., tom. v., pp. 284-93; _Acosta_, _Hist. de las Ynd._, pp.

491-2; _Bernal Diaz_, _Hist. Conq._, fol. 68; _Veytia_, _Hist. Ant.

Mej._, tom. iii., pp. 189-90, 193-8; _Prescott's Mex._, vol. i., pp.

38-40; _Solis_, _Hist. Conq. Mex._, tom. i., pp. 417-19; _Pimentel_,

_Mem. sobre la Raza Indígena_, pp. 36-7; _Carbajal Espinosa_, _Hist.

Mex._, tom. i., pp. 99, 101, 437, 495, 589-93, 631, tom. ii., p. 203;

_Laet_, _Novus Orbis_, p. 240; _Dicc. Univ._, tom. x., p. 637;

_Brasseur de Bourbourg_, _Hist. Nat. Civ._, tom. iii., pp. 606-9;

_Carbajal_, _Discurso_, pp. 36, 45-6, 58; _Dillon_, _Hist. Mex._, pp.

42-5; _Klemm_, _Cultur-Geschichte_, pp. 55, 59, 68-72, 211; _Baril_,

_Mexique_, pp. 206-8; _Bussierre_, _L'Empire Mex._, pp. 153-8;

_Soden_, _Spanier in Peru_, tom. ii., p. 13; _Lang's Polynesian Nat._,

p. 99; _Brownell's Ind. Races_, p. 83; _Touron_, _Hist. Gén._, tom.

iii., pp. 25-9, 38; _Monglave_, _Résumé_, pp. 23, 65.

The Native Races [of the Pacific states], Volume 2, Civilized Nations The Works of Hubert Howe Bancroft, Volume 2 · 第 7 / 26 章