CHAPTER X.

FROM "OTELLO" TO "SEMIRAMIDE."

In 1816, Rossini brought out at the San Carlo, of Naples, the second of

his serious operas, or at least the second of those which were destined

to make a mark: _Otello_. This work exhibited reforms of various kinds

much more important than any that are to be noticed in _Tancredi_.

Recitative is more sparingly used than in the earlier work, and for the

first time it is accompanied by the full band. Now, too, Rossini

banished the piano from the orchestra, where it had been allowed to

remain long after its expulsion as an orchestral instrument from the

bands of Germany and (thanks to Gluck) of France. Two years after its

production at Naples Byron witnessed a representation of _Otello_ at

Venice, and gives some account of it in one of his letters dated 1818.

The libretto struck him as bad and ridiculous, but he praises the music,

and the style in which it was executed. Lord Mount-Edgcumbe, when the

work was given in London, must have been disgusted to find two of the

leading parts assigned to bass voices. Iago is of necessity almost as

important a character as Othello himself. Rossini's librettist kept him,

nevertheless, a little too much in the back ground, while Roderigo, on

the other hand, is too much brought forward. In expelling the piano from

the orchestra Rossini at the same time, did away with those interminable

recitatives accompanied by piano or piano and double bass which

separated the musical pieces in the works composed by Rossini's

predecessors. It was the impersonation, however, of _Otello_ by Davide,

which, in the way of acting and singing, helped more than anything else

to ensure the success of the performance.

"Davide," wrote a French critic, M. Bertin, from Venice, in 1823,

"excites among the _dilettanti_ of this town an enthusiasm and delight

which could scarcely be conceived without having been witnessed. He is a

singer of the new school, full of mannerism, affectation and display,

abusing, like Martin, his magnificent voice with its prodigious compass

(three octaves comprised between four B flats). He crushes the principal

motive of an air beneath the luxuriance of his ornamentation, which has

no other merit than that of difficulty conquered. But he is also a

singer of warmth, _verve_, expression, energy and musical sentiment;

alone he can fill up and give life to a scene; it is impossible for

another singer to carry away an audience as he does, and when he will

only be simple he is admirable; he is the Rossini of song, he is a great

singer, the greatest I have ever heard. Doubtless the manner in which

Garcia plays and sings the part of Otello is preferable, taking it

altogether, to that of Davide. It is purer, more severe, more constantly

dramatic; but with all his faults Davide produces more effect--a great

deal more effect. There is something in him, I cannot say what, which,

even when he is ridiculous, commands, enhances attention. He never

leaves you cold, and when he does not move you he astonishes you; in a

word, before hearing him, I did not know what the power of singing

really was. The enthusiasm he excites is without limits. In fact his

faults are not faults, for Italians who in their _opera seria_ do not

employ what the French call the tragic style, scarcely understand us

when we tell them that a waltz or a quadrille movement is out of place

in the mouth of a Caesar, an Assur, or an Otello. With them the essential

thing is to please; they are only difficult on this point, and their

indifference as to all the rest is really inconceivable. Here is an

example of it. Davide, considering, apparently, that the final duet of

_Otello_ did not sufficiently show off his voice, determined to

substitute for it a duet from _Armida_ ('Amor possente nome') which is

very pretty, but anything rather than severe. As it was impossible to

kill Desdemona to such a tune, the Moor, after giving way to the most

violent jealousy, sheaths his dagger, and begins in the most tender and

graceful manner his duet with Desdemona, at the conclusion of which he

takes her politely by the hand, and retires amidst the applause and

bravos of the public, who seems to think it quite natural that the piece

should finish in this manner, or rather that it should not finish at

all; for after this beautiful _denouement_ the action is about as far

advanced as it was in the first scene. We do not in France carry our

love of music so far as to tolerate such absurdities as these, and

perhaps we are right."

_Otello_ in the present day seems somewhat antiquated, and in some of

the dramatic scenes the accent of passion is smothered beneath roulades

and vocalistic ornaments of all kinds. But it contains some fine pieces,

and the last act is full of beauty. Speaking once to a friend on the

subject of his own operas, Rossini said that much of what he had written

must in time pass out of fashion, but that he believed the second act of

_William Tell_, the last act of _Otello_, and the whole of the _Barber

of Seville_ would survive the rest.[8] _Il Barbiere_ is, indeed, as

fresh now as when it was first written. Yet Paisiello's treatment of the

same subject was found to be old-fashioned in a very few years--was in

fact rendered so by the newness, the brightness, the youthful gaiety of

Rossini's setting.

Nothing more need be said in this volume of Rossini considered as a

composer of comic opera. He cultivated every style, including the

ancient style of _La Cenerentola_ which contains much comic with some

serious music, and of _La Gazza Ladra_, which might well have been

treated seriously throughout, though in some of the gravest situations

of this work he is gay, in some of the severest, lively.

_La Cenerentola_, like _Il Barbiere_, _La Gazza Ladra_, and so many

successful operas by Rossini and other Italian composers (_L'Elisir_,

_Linda_, _Lucrezia_, _La Favorita_, _Maria di Rohan_, for instance, of

Donizetti, and the _Sonnambula_ and _Norma_ of Bellini), is based on a

French play--the ingenious comedy of _Cendrillon_, by Etienne. Rossini

composed it for the Teatro Valle of Rome, where it was produced for the

carnival of 1817, on the 26th of December, 1816, precisely one year

after _Torvaldo e Dorliska_, nearly one year after the _Barber_, a few

months after _Otello_, and a few months before _La Gazza Ladra_. Between

the winter of 1815 and the spring of 1816, Rossini composed and produced

six operas, including the four admirable ones just named. The two others

given with comparatively little success were _Torvaldo e Dorliska_ and

_La Gazzetta_.

_La Cenerentola_, on its first production, excited no such enthusiasm as

_Il Barbiere_, but drew after its second or third representation. It is

known to have been Rossini's custom when an opera of his fell, to pick

up the pieces; and the score of _La Cenerentola_ was adorned throughout

with fragments saved from the ruins of his earlier works; such as the

wholly forgotten _Pietra del Paragone_ and the never-much-remembered

_Turco in Italia_. To the former had originally belonged the drinking

chorus, the burlesque proclamation of the Baron, and the duet "Un soave

non so che;" to the latter the duet "Zitti zitti," the sestet and the

stretta of the finale.

To _La Cenerentola_ belongs the most beautiful and the most striking of

Rossini's final airs for the prima donna: the once highly popular "Non

piu mesta." This was his fourth air of the kind; and he now abandoned

this method of bringing an opera to a brilliant termination in favour of

other composers--who duly adopted it.

The part of Cenerentola, like that of Rosina, was written for Madame

Giorgi-Righetti, who obtained therein the most brilliant success,

especially in the famous _rondo finale_. All Rossini's great prima-donna

parts were composed for the contralto or for the mezzo-soprano voice;

for Madame Marcolini, Tancredi; for Madame Giorgi-Righetti, Rosina and

Cenerentola; and for Mademoiselle Colbran, Desdemona and Semiramide.

When Rossini began his career, so absurd was the prevalent custom of

distributing the parts that the first woman's part was habitually given

to the contralto, the first man's part to the sopranist, or artificial

male soprano. Rossini continued to compose principal female parts, first

for the contralto, then for the mezzo-soprano voice; and it was only

when he produced _Matilda di Shubrun_ towards the end of his Italian

career (1821) that he assigned a leading character to a soprano. Matilda

in _Matilda di Shubrun_, and Matilde in _Guillaume Tell_, are the only

two parts that Rossini ever wrote for the soprano voice.

Whether soprano voices have been forced into activity in order to suit

new tastes, or whether composers have taken to writing for the soprano

voice because in the present day sopranos, and especially "light

sopranos," abound, whereas good mezzo-soprano and contralto voices are

but rarely to be met with, it would be difficult to say. But with the

exception of Meyerbeer's _Africaine_ and Donizetti's _Favorita_, no

leading operatic part has for the last fifty years or more been written

for the contralto voice.

A new kind of part, however, has been found for the most masculine of

feminine voices; such parts as those of Pippo in _La Gazza Ladra_, of

Malcolm Graeme in _La Donna del Lago_, and of Arsace in _Semiramide_; and

here again we see an innovation of Rossini's, which by his successors

has been generally adopted.

In connection with _La Gazza Ladra_ a few words may here be said of

Rossini's orchestration; much more varied, more brilliant and more

sonorous than that of his predecessors. Rossini introduced new

instruments, and with them new instrumental combinations. These

innovations, like those consisting in a new distribution of the voice

parts, and in the substitution of orchestral melodies with declamatory

phrases here and there for the singers in lieu of endless recitative

accompanied by chords for the violoncello and piano, excited the

hostility of many orthodox professors, together with old-fashioned

connoisseurs and amateurs of all kinds. They accused Rossini of bringing

clarinets from cowherds, horns from the hunting field, trumpets from the

camp, and trombones from the infernal regions. He was destined, on

establishing himself at Paris, to introduce cornets, ophicleides, and,

in the overture to _William Tell_, the nearest possible approach to the

instrument with which the cowherds of Switzerland do really appeal to

the animals placed under their care. But before he had reached these

extremes, before he had in _Semiramide_ brought an entire military band

on to the stage, and had in the same opera written for four horns a

beautiful and beautifully harmonised melody which does not in any way

suggest the chase, he raised the mortal anger of one of his adversaries

and actually placed his life in danger by beginning the overture to _La

Gazza Ladra_ with a duet for drums. A young enthusiast on the side of

stagnation went about armed with the proclaimed intention of slaying the

ruthless innovator. Rossini sent for the juvenile fanatic, talked to

him, explained that in a piece of a military character drums were not

altogether out of place and at last succeeded in appeasing his fury.

To appreciate at a glance Rossini's importance as a writer for the

orchestra it is only necessary to recall the fact that he alone of

Italian composers has composed overtures which live with a life of their

own apart from the works to which they belong, and that of such

overtures he has left five; those of the _Barber_, of _La Gazza Ladra_,

of _Semiramide_, of the _Siege of Corinth_, and of _William Tell_.

The Great Musicians: Rossini and His School · 第 10 / 13 章