Dave came to my husband with a proposition——

Mr. HUBERT. There were only four people present?

Mrs. RICH. Let me clarify the statement about Dave. He was a bartender

for the University Club on Commerce Street in Dallas. I became

associated with him and subsequently so did my husband. Well, at first

it looked all right to me. They wanted someone to pilot a boat—someone

that knew Cuba, and my husband claimed he did. Whether he did, I don’t

know. I know he did know boats. So they were going to bring Cuban

refugees out into Miami. All this was fine, because by that time

everyone knew Castro for what he appears to be, shall we say. So I said

sure, why not—$10,000. I said that is fine.

Mr. HUBERT. Do I understand from that that you and your husband were to

receive $10,000 for your services?

Mrs. RICH. Well, I was incidental.

Mr. HUBERT. No; I would like to know.

Mrs. RICH. I say I was incidental. My husband was.

Mr. HUBERT. Your husband was to receive $10,000?

Mrs. RICH. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. Who told him so?

Mrs. RICH. The colonel.

Mr. HUBERT. Where did this meeting take place?

Mrs. RICH. In Dallas at an apartment building. Again, I can describe

that darned building to a “T” and I couldn’t tell you what street it is

on.

Mr. HUBERT. Would you describe it for us, please?

Mrs. RICH. Yes; it was sitting—if I may do it in diagram.

Mr. HUBERT. Do you know what section of the city it was?

Mrs. RICH. No; this I don’t. You come along—let’s say this is your

main street, that the apartment building set on. We have an apartment

building, not setting facing the street, but with the side towards the

street. A hill slopes up. There is a path that kind of winds around.

There are flowers and gardens here; and in them I believe there is

a little fountain—and in them was lights—illuminating the gardens;

and you have to come up a little hill, and walk around—I am not sure

whether there was a gravel path or not, or whether it is flagstone—and

into the building here. And it was a double deck, I believe—perhaps a

triple.

Mr. HUBERT. Apartment house?

Mrs. RICH. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. How many apartments, roughly speaking?

Mrs. RICH. I could not say how many. The standard apartment building

for Dallas.

Mr. HUBERT. Well, now, at this point let us do this: You have handed

us the card that you referred to in your testimony previously. We have

now had a Xerox copy made of it. I am handing you back the original.

For the purpose of identification, I am marking the Xerox copy, front

and back, as follows, to wit: “Washington, D.C., June 2, 1964, Exhibit

No. 3, Deposition of Nancy Perrin Rich,” and I am signing my name below

that. And on the reverse side of it, which appears on another Xerox

page, I am marking for the purpose of identification the following:

“Washington, D.C., June 2, 1964, Exhibit No. 3-A, Deposition of Nancy

Perrin Rich,” under which I have signed my name. And I ask you, please,

to sign both documents below my name so that the record will show that

we have been speaking of the same document.

Mrs. RICH. Note for the record that I signed Nancy E. Perrin Rich under

Mr. Hubert’s name on Exhibit No. 3. Will you note for the record that I

signed Nancy E. Perrin Rich under Mr. Hubert’s name on Exhibit No. 3-A.

(The documents referred to were marked Nancy Perrin Rich Exhibits Nos.

3 and 3-A for identification.)

Mr. HUBERT. Now, a moment ago you were testifying concerning an

apartment house at which you and your husband met a colonel and another

man by the name of Dave C., I think you said.

Mrs. RICH. Yes; that is an initial—C. Dave took us there.

Mr. HUBERT. I am going to mark that document for the purpose of

identification “Washington, D.C., June 2, 1964, Exhibit No. 4,

Deposition of Nancy Perrin Rich,” under which I am signing my name, and

I ask you to sign your name on it, if you please.

Mrs. RICH. I didn’t mean for this to be an exhibit. Will you note for

the record that I signed Nancy E. Perrin Rich under Mr. Hubert’s name

on Exhibit No. 4. Also note for the record the writing I am doing after

signing is merely designating what the lines mean.

(The document referred to was marked Nancy Perrin Rich Exhibit No. 4

for identification.)

Mr. HUBERT. Am I correct in stating that prior to the writing you

have just put on the document, Exhibit No. 4, there were merely lines

which indicated a street and an apartment and a little path, showing

a garden. And that since the document has been identified, you have

written in all that appears in handwriting?

Mrs. RICH. That is correct.

Mr. HUBERT. Do you remember on what floor this apartment was that you

visited?

Mrs. RICH. I believe the first.

Mr. HUBERT. Do you remember whether it was to the left or the right as

you went in?

Mrs. RICH. There was no question of left or right as such. It was—you

just walked in. There was no hallway to indicate left or right, if that

is what you are referring to.

Mr. HUBERT. In other words, this apartment actually opened on the path?

Mrs. RICH. That is correct.

Mr. HUBERT. How many rooms did it have?

Mrs. RICH. I don’t recall whether it was a one or two bedroom.

Mr. HUBERT. Can you give us any other description of the apartment

building, first of all?

Mrs. RICH. The apartment itself wasn’t too well furnished.

Mr. HUBERT. Was it a brick apartment?

Mrs. RICH. I believe it was. Either brick or stucco.

Mr. HUBERT. Do you know the color of it?

Mrs. RICH. I don’t. But I believe it had colored doors. Now, I could be

mistaken.

Mr. HUBERT. And the apartment itself was one or two bedrooms, and I

think you say it was not well furnished. Do you recall anything about

the interior of the apartment that would be significant?

Mrs. RICH. Let me clarify that. When I say not well furnished, I should

have said sparsely furnished. It looked like an unfurnished apartment

that he had just thrown some furniture into and not too much of it. I

believe I remember he said something about he just moved in; hadn’t

finished it.

Mr. HUBERT. Did it have lamps in it?

Mrs. RICH. I believe it did. I think it had one lamp on the table.

Mr. HUBERT. Do you recall anything about the furniture that was there?

Mrs. RICH. Yes; it was, I believe you call it Danish modern.

Mr. HUBERT. Was it upholstered?

Mrs. RICH. I don’t recall. It was typical cheap apartment furniture. I

believe it had plastic upholstery.

Mr. HUBERT. I think you said you went there at night.

Mrs. RICH. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. About what time?

Mrs. RICH. It was after dark. Probably 9 o’clock.

Mr. HUBERT. Do you recall how long it took you to drive from where you

were living to this place?

Mrs. RICH. No; I do not.

Mr. HUBERT. How did you get there?

Mrs. RICH. In Dave’s car. Now, again, I said four people present.

I should have counted—he had a girl with him. She wasn’t in it or

anything, just some girl he had along for the evening. She was never

part of it. In fact, I think she stayed in the car.

Mr. HUBERT. How long were you in the place?

Mrs. RICH. Oh, probably half an hour, 45 minutes, an hour at the most.

Mr. HUBERT. What was the general discussion?

Mrs. RICH. Feeling each other out. I just kind of sat there and

listened. The general gist of it was we were going to obtain a boat,

the colonel could obtain various things, and nothing specific was

mentioned on what the various things were at that time. And we were

going to go and pick up—they were deciding where to pick them up—pick

up Cuban refugees, and bring them over to the main coast, meaning

Miami, which, quite frankly, I adhered to because at that time, as

I say, Castro is or was what we suppose him to be today, and quite

frankly I had seen underprivileged countries and at that time thought

it was a good idea.

Mr. HUBERT. Was the sum of $10,000 mentioned at that meeting?

Mrs. RICH. Yes; it was.

Mr. HUBERT. Who mentioned it?

Mrs. RICH. The colonel. And it seemed awfully exorbitant for something

like this. I smelled a fish, to quote a maxim.

Mr. HUBERT. You mean you thought that there was too much money involved

for this sort of operation?

Mrs. RICH. Yes; I did.

Mr. HUBERT. You didn’t express that view, of course?

Mrs. RICH. No; I didn’t say anything. I just kept quiet.

Mr. HUBERT. How were matters left at the end of that meeting?

Mrs. RICH. That there were more people involved, and that we were to

attend a meeting at some later date, of which we would be advised.

Mr. HUBERT. Were you advised?

Mrs. RICH. We were.

Mr. HUBERT. Did another meeting take place?

Mrs. RICH. Yes; it did.

Mr. HUBERT. How long after the first?

Mrs. RICH. Oh, probably 5 or 6 days, give or take a day or 2.

Mr. HUBERT. At the same place?

Mrs. RICH. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. Was it at night?

Mrs. RICH. It was.

Mr. HUBERT. How did you get there then?

Mrs. RICH. We went in our own car, but with Dave with us. At that time,

Dave and my husband and I were in our car.

Mr. HUBERT. All right. Tell us what happened.

Mrs. RICH. Well, we got there and at that time there was the colonel

and another middle-aged woman, kind of a real old granite face I would

describe her, steel-gray hair. Looked rather mannish. And there was a

rather——

Mr. HUBERT. Did you know her name?

Mrs. RICH. No; I was introduced. Names were mentioned around. I don’t

recall it. And then there was another rather pugnacious-looking fellow,

who looked at though he might have been an ex-prizefighter.

Mr. HUBERT. Were you introduced to him?

Mrs. RICH. I was introduced to everyone.

Mr. HUBERT. Who else was there?

Mrs. RICH. The colonel, the woman, and the prizefighter type, a couple

of other men that just kind of sat off in the corner. One of them

looked rather dark, like he might have been Cuban or Latin American,

and Dave, my husband, and myself.

Mr. HUBERT. Tell us what happened at that meeting.

Mrs. RICH. Well, apparently from what I could discern, they had some

kind of a hitch in their plans. And at that time I point blank spoke

up and said, “Well, suppose we discuss the plans in full before

we”—meaning my husband and myself—“get into this. I would like to know

what we are getting into. And at this point you know by now I certainly

have a say in this matter.” Then it came out—boom—quite blank. We were

going to bring Cuban refugees out—but we were going to run military

supplies and Enfield rifles in.

Mr. HUBERT. Who made that statement?

Mrs. RICH. I believe it was the Latin-looking fellow that first made

the statement. But the colonel clarified it. The colonel seemed to be

the head of it and seemed to do all the talking.

Mr. HUBERT. He was in uniform?

Mrs. RICH. Yes; he was.

Mr. HUBERT. Could you describe what the colonel looked like?

Mrs. RICH. Vaguely. I would say approximately 45 to 50, perhaps a

little younger. He was kind of bald, and that may have made him look

older. As I recall, a rather slightly built man—and I would not swear

to it.

Mr. HUBERT. Did he have any other characteristics?

Mrs. RICH. Not that I can recall, sir.

Mr. HUBERT. Was he in summer uniform?

Mrs. RICH. Yes; he was.

Mr. HUBERT. Short sleeves?

Mrs. RICH. If my memory serves me; yes.

Mr. HUBERT. Did he tell you whom he was representing in the matter?

Mrs. RICH. Not exactly. That fact never did come clear to me. A group

of people.

Mr. HUBERT. Well, did he indicate in anyway that he was acting

officially, in his official capacity?

Mrs. RICH. No; he was not acting officially.

Mr. HUBERT. How do you know that?

Mrs. RICH. Because of certain statements that were made—statements

such as that the guns would have to come in via Mexico, meaning the

Enfield rifles. Statements like “We have been taking stuff off of the

base for the last 3 months getting prepared for this”—meaning military

equipment, I suppose small arms, or explosives, et cetera, as I

understood it.

Mr. HUBERT. He was also in uniform on the first occasion?

Mrs. RICH. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. The same type of uniform?

Mrs. RICH. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. You say you never saw him out of uniform? All of the times

you saw him he was in uniform?

Mrs. RICH. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. Summer uniform?

Mrs. RICH. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. So at that meeting it came out that the project had two

purposes. One was to bring arms in, and the other was to take refuges

out.

Mrs. RICH. Yes; to make money both ways. Then it became crystal clear

why so much money was to be paid for the pilot of the boat.

Mr. HUBERT. And how was that meeting left?

Mrs. RICH. Well, at that time when he said that, my first thought

was “Nancy, get out of here, this is no good, this stinks.” I have

no qualms about making money, but not when it is against the Federal

Government but let’s play along and see what happens. I said, “All

right, we will go. But you can take the $10,000 and keep it. I want

$25,000 or we don’t move.” It was left that the bigwigs would decide

among themselves. During this meeting I had the shock of my life.

Apparently they were having some hitch in money arriving. No one

actually said that that was what it was. But this is what I presumed it

to be. I am sitting there. A knock comes on the door and who walks in

but my little friend Jack Ruby. And you could have knocked me over with

a feather.

Mr. HUBERT. That was at the second meeting?

Mrs. RICH. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. Now, what facts occurred to give you the impression that

there was a hitch with respect to money?

Mrs. RICH. Oh, just that they were talking about, well, first of

all when I say we—a group of people were supposed to go to Mexico

to make the arrangement for rifles but “Well, no, you can’t leave

tomorrow”—they dropped it. And just evasive statements that led me to

believe that perhaps they were lacking in funds.

And then Ruby comes in, and everybody looks like this, you know, a big

smile—like here comes the Saviour, or something. And he took one look

at me, I took one look at him, and we glared, we never spoke a word.

I don’t know if you have ever met the man. But he has this nervous

air about him. And he seemed overly nervous that night. He bustled on

in. The colonel rushed out into the kitchen or bedroom, I am not sure

which. Ruby had—and he always did carry a gun—and I noticed a rather

extensive bulge in his—about where his breast pocket would be. But at

that time I thought it was a shoulder holster, which he was in the

habit of carrying.

Mr. HUBERT. He was in the habit of carrying?

Mrs. RICH. Yes. Either a shoulder holster or a gun stuck in his pocket.

I always had a gun behind the bar. That is normal.

Mr. HUBERT. You had seen it at his shoulder?

Mrs. RICH. Yes; which was normal—because he made the bank deposit. I

made the bank deposit a couple of times for him and carried a gun when

I made it.

Mr. HUBERT. Did he show any signs of recognition of you?

Mrs. RICH. Yes; he glared at me and I glared back, as much as to say to

each other what the heck are you doing here.

Mr. HUBERT. Had you told the colonel and Dave what your name was prior

to that?

Mrs. RICH. At that time we—I think it will be obvious to you gentlemen

the reason—we were going under Jack Starr and Nancy Starr.

Mr. HUBERT. Do you mean that is the name that Ruby knew you under?

Mrs. RICH. No. Jack Ruby knew me as Nancy Perrin.

Mr. HUBERT. And he knew your husband was Robert Perrin?

Mrs. RICH. Yes. But like I say for obvious reasons we used the name

Jack and Nancy Starr.

Mr. HUBERT. That is to say, you told the colonel and Dave that your

name——

Mrs. RICH. No; Dave knew our real name.

Warren Commission (14 of 26): Hearings Vol. XIV (of 15) · 第 176 / 309 题