The brank was an instrument employed by our forefathers for punishing

scolds. It is also sometimes called the gossip's bridle, and in the

Macclesfield town records it is designated "a brydle for a curste

queane." In the term "queane" we have the old English synonym for a

woman; now the chief woman, the Queen. The brank is not of such great

antiquity as the ducking-stool, for the earliest mention of it we have

been able to find in this country is in the Corporation records of

Macclesfield, of the year 1623. At an earlier period, we have traces of

it in Scotland. In Glasgow burgh records, it is stated that in 1574 two

scolds were condemned to be "branket." The Kirk-session records of

Stirling for 1600 mention the "brankes" as a punishment for the shrew.

It is generally believed that the punishment is of Continental origin.

The brank may be described simply as an iron framework which was placed

on the head, enclosing it in a kind of cage; it had in front a plate of

iron, which, either sharpened or covered with spikes, was so situated as

to be placed in the mouth of the victim, and if she attempted to move

her tongue in any way whatever, it was certain to be shockingly injured.

With a brank on her head she was conducted through the streets, led by a

chain, held by one of the town's officials, an object of contempt, and

subjected to the jeers of the crowd and often left to their mercy. In

some towns it was the custom to chain the culprit to the pillory,

whipping-post, or market-cross. She thus suffered for telling her mind

to some petty tyrant in office, or speaking plainly to a wrong-doer, or

for taking to task a lazy, and perhaps a drunken husband.

[Illustration: BRANK IN LEEDS PHILOSOPHICAL MUSEUM.]

In Yorkshire, we have only seen two branks. We give a sketch of one

formerly in possession of the late Norrisson Scatcherd, F.S.A., the

historian of Morley. It is now in the Leeds Philosophical Museum, where

it attracts considerable attention. It is one of the most simple and

harmless examples that has come under our notice. Amongst the relics of

the olden time in the Museum of the Yorkshire Philosophical Society,

York, is another specimen, equally simple in its construction. It was

presented by Lady Thornton to the Society in 1880, and near it may be

seen thumb-screws from York Castle; leg bar, waist girdle, and wrist

shackles, worn by the notorious highwayman, Dick Turpin, executed April

17th, 1739; and a leg bar, worn by another notorious highwayman, named

Nevison, who suffered death on the gallows, May 4th, 1684.

The brank which has received the greatest attention is the one preserved

in the vestry of Walton-on-Thames Parish Church. It bears the date of

1632, and the following couplet:--

"Chester presents Walton with a bridle

To curb women's tongues that talk too idle."

It is traditionally said that this brank was given to Walton Parish by a

person named Chester, who had, through a gossiping and lying woman of

his acquaintance, lost an estate he expected to inherit from a rich

relative. We are enabled to give an illustration of the Walton brank.

[Illustration: BRANK AT WALTON-ON-THAMES.]

Dr. T. N. Brushfield described in an exhaustive manner all the Cheshire

branks, in an able paper read before the Architectural, Archaeological,

and Historic Society of Chester, and published in 1858. We are unable to

direct attention to all the branks noticed by Dr. Brushfield, but cannot

refrain from presenting the following account of the one at Congleton,

which is preserved in the Town Hall of that ancient borough. "It was,"

we are informed, "formerly in the hands of the town jailor, whose

services were not infrequently called into requisition. In the

old-fashioned, half-timbered houses in the borough, there was generally

fixed on one side of the large open fire-places a hook, so that, when a

man's wife indulged her scolding propensities, the husband sent for the

town jailor to bring the bridle, and had her bridled and chained to the

hook until she promised to behave herself better for the future. I have

seen one of these hooks, and have often heard husbands say to their

wives: 'If you don't rest with your tongue I'll send for the bridle and

hook you up.' The Mayor and Justices frequently brought the instrument

into use; for when women were brought before them charged with

street-brawling, and insulting the constables and others while in the

discharge of their duty, they have ordered them to be bridled and led

through the borough by the jailor. The last time this bridle was

publicly used was in 1824, when a woman was brought before the Mayor

(Bulkeley Johnson, Esq.) one Monday, charged with scolding and using

harsh language to the churchwardens and constables as they went, on the

Sunday morning, round the town to see that all the public-houses were

empty and closed during divine service. On examination, a Mr. Richard

Edwards stated on oath that on going round the town with the

churchwardens on the previous day, they met the woman (Ann Runcorn) in

a place near 'The Cockshoot,' and that immediately seeing them she

commenced a sally of abuse, calling them all the scoundrels and rogues

she could lay her tongue to; and telling them 'it would look better of

them if they would look after their own houses rather than go looking

after other folk's, which were far better than their own.' After other

abuse of a like character, they thought it only right to apprehend her,

and so brought her before the Bench on the following day. The Mayor then

delivered the following sentence: 'That it is the unanimous decision of

the Mayor and Justices that the prisoner (Ann Runcorn) there and then

have the town's bridle for scolding women put upon her, and that she be

led by the magistrate's clerk's clerk through every street in the town,

as an example to all scolding women; and that the Mayor and magistrates

were much obliged to the churchwardens for bringing the case before

them.'" "In this case," Mr. Warrington, who furnished Dr. Brushfield

with the foregoing information, adds: "I both heard the evidence and saw

the decision carried out. The bridle was put on the woman, and she was

then led through the town by one Prosper Haslam, the town clerk's

clerk, accompanied by hundreds of the inhabitants; and on her return to

the Town Hall the bridle was taken off in the presence of the Mayor,

magistrates, constables, churchwardens, and assembled inhabitants."

[Illustration: BRANK AT STOCKPORT.]

In Cheshire, at the present time, there are traces of thirteen branks,

and at Stockport is the most brutal example of the English branks. "It

will be observed," says the local historian, Dr. Henry Heginbotham,

J.P., "that the special characteristic of this brank is the peculiar

construction of the tongue-plate or gag. It is about two inches long,

having at the end, as may be seen in the engraving, a ball, into which

is inserted a number of sharp iron pins, three on the upper surface,

three on the lower, and two pointing backwards. These could not fail to

pin the tongue, and effectually silence the noisiest brawler. At the

fore part of the collar, there is an iron chain, with a leathern thong

attached, by which the offender was led for public gaze through the

market-place." It was formerly on market days exhibited in front of the

house of the person who had charge of it, as a warning to scolding or

swearing women. Dr. Heginbotham states that: "There is no evidence of

its having been actually used for many years, but there is testimony to

the fact, that within the last forty years the brank was brought to a

termagant market woman, who was effectually silenced by its threatened

application."

We are indebted to Mr. Alfred Burton for a drawing of the Macclesfield

brank. Dr. Brushfield describes this as "a respectable-looking brank."

He tells us that "the gag is plain, and the end of it is turned down;

there is only one band which passes over the head, and is hinged to the

hoops; a temporary joint exists at the upper part, and ample provision

is made for readily adjusting it to any description of head. The chain

still remains attached to the hoop. About the year 1858, Mr. Swinnerton

informed Dr. Brushfield that he had never seen it used, but that at the

petty sessions it had often been produced _in terrorem_, to stay the

volubility of a woman's tongue; and that a threat by a magistrate to

order its appliance had always proved sufficient to abate the garrulity

of the most determined scold."

[Illustration: BRANK AT MACCLESFIELD.]

Towards the close of the first quarter of the present century, the brank

was last used at Altrincham. A virago, who caused her neighbours great

trouble, was frequently cautioned in vain respecting her conduct, and as

a last resource she was condemned to walk through the town wearing the

brank. She refused to move, and it was finally decided to wheel her in

a barrow through the principal streets of the town, round the

market-place, and to her own home. The punishment had the desired

effect, and for the remainder of her life she kept a quiet tongue.

There are many traces of the brank in Lancashire. Mr. W. E. A. Axon

informs us that his father remembers the brank being used at Manchester

at the commencement of the present century. Kirkham had its brank for

scolds, in addition to a ducking-stool. We find, in the same county,

traces of the brank at Holme, in the Forest of Rossendale. In the

accounts of the Greave for the Forest of Rossendale for 1691-2 is an

entry of the true antiquarian cast:

Item, for a Bridle for scouldinge women, 2s. 6d.

In "Some Obsolete Peculiarities of English Law," by William Beamont, the

author gives particulars respecting the Warrington brank. "Hanging up in

our museum," says Mr. Beamont, "may be seen a representation of a

withered female face wearing the brank or scold's bridle; one of which

instruments, as inflexible as iron and ingenuity can make it, for

keeping an unruly tongue quiet by mechanical means, hangs up beside it;

and almost within the time of living memory, Cicily Pewsill, an inmate

of the workhouse, and a notorious scold, was seen wearing this

disagreeable head-gear in the streets of Warrington for half-an-hour or

more.... Cicily Pewsill's case still lingers in tradition, as the last

occasion of its application in Warrington, and it will soon pass into

history."

The Rev. J. Clay told Mr. William Dobson that since his connection with

Preston House of Correction the brank was put on a woman there, but the

matter coming to the knowledge of the Home Secretary, its further use

was prohibited, and to make sure of the barbarous practice being

discontinued the brank itself was ordered to be sent to London. A second

brank was kept in the prison, principally formed of leather, but with an

iron tongue-piece.[43]

[Illustration: BRANK AT THE MANOR HOUSE, HAMSTALL RIDWARE.]

At the north country town of Morpeth a brank is still preserved. The

following is a record of its use: "Dec. 3, 1741, Elizabeth, wife of

George Holborn, was punished with the branks for two hours, at the

Market Cross, Morpeth, by order of Mr. Thomas Gait and Mr. George

Nicholls, then bailiffs, for scandalous and opprobrious language to

several persons in the town, as well as to the said bailiffs."

[Illustration: BRANK AT LICHFIELD.]

Staffordshire supplies several notable examples of the brank. They were

formerly kept at Hamstall Ridware, Beaudesart, Lichfield, Walsall, and

at Newcastle-under-Lyme. The branks in the two towns last named are

alluded to by the celebrated Dr. Plot, the old historian of the county,

in an amusing manner. "We come to the arts that respect mankind," says

Plot, "amongst which, as elsewhere, the civility of precedence must be

allowed to the woman, and that as well in punishments as favours. For

the former, whereof they have such a peculiar artifice at Newcastle

[under Lyme] and Walsall for correcting of scolds, which it does, too,

so effectually and so very safely, that I look upon it as much to be

preferred to the cucking-stool, which not only endangers the health of

the party, but also gives her tongue liberty 'twixt every dip, to

neither of which is this at all liable, it being such a bridle for the

tongue as not only quite deprives them of speech, but brings shame for

the transgression, and humility thereupon, before 'tis taken off. Which,

being an instrument scarce heard of, much less seen, I have here

presented it to the reader's view [here follows a reference to a plate]

as it was taken from the original one, made of iron, at

Newcastle-under-Lyme, wherein the letter _a_ shows the jointed collar

that comes round the neck; _b_, _c_, the loops and staples to let it out

and in, according to the bigness and slenderness of the neck; _d_, the

jointed semicircle that comes over the head, made forked at one end to

let through the nose, and _e_, the plate-iron that is put into the

mouth and keeps down the tongue. Which, being put upon the offender by

order of the magistrate, and fastened with a padlock behind, she is led

through the town by an officer, to her shame, nor is it taken off until

after the party begins to show all external signs imaginable of

humiliation and amendment." This brank afterwards passed into the hands

of Mr. Joseph Mayer, F.S.A. founder of the Museum at Liverpool.

[Illustration: CHESTERFIELD BRANK.]

It is pleasing to record the fact that there is only trace of one brank

belonging to Derbyshire--a circumstance which speaks well for its men

and women. The latter have for a long period borne exemplary characters.

Philip Kinder, in the preface of his projected "History of Derbyshire,"

written about the middle of the seventeenth century, alludes to them.

"The country-women here," says Kinder, "are chaste and sober, and very

diligent in their housewifery; they hate idleness, love and obey their

husbands; only in some of the great towns many of the seeming

sanctificators used to follow the Presbyterian gang, and on a lecture

day put on their best rayment, and doo hereby take occasion to goo a

gossipping. Your merry wives of Bentley will sometimes look in ye

glass, chirpe a cupp merrily, yet not indecently. In the Peak they are

much given to dance after the bagpipes--almost every towne hath a

bagpipe in it." "The Chesterfield brank," says Mr. Llewellyn Jewitt, "is

a remarkably good example, and has the additional interest of bearing a

date. It is nine inches in height, and six inches and three-quarters

across the hoop. It consists of a hoop of iron, hinged on either side

and fastening behind, and a band, also of iron, passing over the head

from back to front, and opening in front to admit the nose of the woman

whose misfortune it was to wear it. The mode of putting it on would be

thus: the brank would be opened by throwing back the sides of the hoop,

and the hinder part of the band by means of the hinges, C, F, F. The

constable, or other official, would then stand in front of his victim,

and force the knife, or plate, A, into her mouth, the divided band

passing on either side of the nose, which would protrude through the

opening, B. The hoop would then be closed behind, the band brought down

from the top to the back of the head, and fastened down upon it, at E,

and thus the cage would at once be firmly and immovably fixed so long as

her tormentors might think fit. On the left side is a chain, D, one end

of which is attached to the hoop, and at the other end is a ring, by

which the victim was led, or by which she was, at pleasure, attached to

a post or wall. On front of the brank are the initials 'T.C.,' and the

date '1688'--the year of the 'Glorious Revolution'--the year of all

years memorable in the annals of Chesterfield and the little village of

Whittington, closely adjoining, in which the Revolution was planned.

Strange that an instrument of brutal and tyrannical torture should be

made and used at Chesterfield at the same moment that the people should

be plotting for freedom at the same place. The brank was formerly in the

old poor-house at Chesterfield, and came into the hands of Mr. Weale,

the assistant Poor-law Commissioner, who presented it to Lady Walsham.

It is (August, 1860) still in the hands of Sir John Walsham, Bart.,

and the drawing from which the accompanying woodcut is executed was

kindly made and furnished to me by Miss Dulcy Bell, Sir John's

sister-in-law."[44]

The Leicester brank is similar to the one at Chesterfield. At the back

of the hoop is a chain about twelve inches long. It was formerly kept in

the Leicester borough gaol.

[Illustration: LEICESTER BRANK.]

In the year 1821, Judge Richardson gave orders for a brank to be

destroyed which was kept ready and most probably frequently used at the

County Hall, Nottingham. We gather from a note furnished by Mr. J.

Potter Briscoe a curious circumstance in connection with this

brank--that it was used to subdue the unruly tongues of the sterner sex,

as well as those of noisy females. James Brodie, a blind beggar who was

executed on the 15th July, 1799, for the murder of his boy-guide, in the

Nottingham Forest, was the last person punished with the brank. During

his imprisonment, prior to execution, he was so noisy that the brank

was called into requisition, to do what he refused to do himself,

namely, to hold his tongue.

[Illustration: BRANK FORMERLY IN THE POSSESSION OF MR. CARRINGTON.]

Here is a picture of a brank formerly in the possession of the late Mr.

F. A. Carrington, the well-known antiquary. It is supposed to belong to

the period of William III. Mr. Carrington could not give any history of

this curious relic of the olden time.

[Illustration: BRANK AT DODDINGTON PARK.]

At Doddington Park, Lincolnshire, a brank is preserved, and is of a

decidedly foreign appearance. It will be noticed that it bears some

resemblance to the peculiar long-snouted visor of the bascinets,

occasionally worn in the reign of Richard II. No historical particulars

are known respecting this grotesque brank.

[Illustration: BRANK IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM.]

In the Ashmolean Museum at Oxford, a curious brank may be seen. It is

not recorded in the catalogue of the collection by whom it was

presented, or where it was previously used; it is described as "a gag

or brank, formerly used with the ducking-stool, as a punishment for

scolds." It will be noticed that a chain is attached to the front of

this brank, so that the poor unfortunate woman, in addition to being

gagged, had the mortification of being led by the nose through the

town. The gag is marked _a_, and _b_ is the aperture for the nose.

[Illustration: ENGINE OF TORTURE IN THE LUDLOW MUSEUM.]

A curious engine of torture may be seen in the Ludlow Museum, and we

give an illustration of it. It belongs to a class of engines far more

formidable than branks. A description of this head-piece appears in the

_Archaeological Journal_ for September, 1856, from the pen of Mr. W. J.

Bernard Smith. "The powerful screwing apparatus," says Mr. Smith, "seems

calculated to force the iron mask with torturing effect upon the brow of

the victim; there are no eye-holes, but concavities in their places, as

though to allow for the starting of the eye-balls under violent

pressure. There is a strong bar with a square hole, evidently intended

to fasten the criminal against a wall, or perhaps to the pillory; and I

have heard it said that these instruments were used to keep the head

steady during the infliction of branding." A curious instrument of

punishment, belonging to the same class as that at Ludlow, is described

at some length, with an illustration, in "Worcester in Olden Times," by

John Noake (London, 1849). The picture and description have been

frequently reproduced.

[Illustration: SHREWSBURY BRANK.]

Several Shropshire branks remain at the present time. The one at

Shrewsbury does not appear to be of any great antiquity. Its form is

simple and its character harmless. This bridle was at one time in

constant use in Shrewsbury, and there are those yet living whose

memories are sufficiently good to carry them back to the days when the

effects of the application of the brank in question were to be seen,

rather than, as now, imagined. The year cannot be ascertained when this

brank was first worn, but it is known to have been last used in

1846.[45]

At Oswestry are two branks, one belonging to the Corporation, and the

other is in the store-room of the Workhouse. The Rector of Whitchurch

has in his possession a brank, which was formerly used by the town and

union authorities. At Market Drayton are two branks: one is the property

of the Lord of the Manor, and the other formerly belonged to the Dodcot

Union. The Market Drayton brank, and also the one at Whitchurch, have on

each a revolving wheel at the end of the gag or tongue-plate. In bygone

times, the brank was frequently used for correcting unmanageable

paupers.

At Edinburgh, in the Museum of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland,

is a brank said to be from a town in East Fifeshire, having a

rowel-shaped gag. In the year 1560, it was decided by the Town Council

of Edinburgh, that all persons found guilty of blasphemy should be

punished by the iron brank. In North Britain, it appears to have been

used for punishing persons guilty of immorality. On the 7th October, the

Kirk-Session of Canongate sentenced David Persoun, convicted of this

offence, to be "brankit for four hours," while his associate in guilt,

Isobel Mountray, was "banisit the gait," that is, expelled from the

parish. Only a week previously, the same Kirk-Session had issued a

proclamation that all women found guilty of this lawlessness "be brankit

six houris at the croce."

We close this chapter by directing attention to the Bishop's brank, kept

at St. Andrews, respecting which a singular story is told. A woman in a

humble walk of life, named Isabel Lindsay, stood up in the parish church

of St. Andrews, during the time of divine service, when Archbishop Sharp

was preaching, and declared that when he was a college student he was

guilty of an illicit amour with her. She was arrested for this

statement, and brought before the Kirk-Sessions, and by its members

sentenced "to appear for a succession of Sundays on the repentance

stool, wearing the brank."

FOOTNOTES:

[43] Dobson's "Preston in the Olden Time," 1857.

[44] "The Reliquary," October, 1860.

[45] Morris's "Obsolete Punishments of Shropshire."

Riding the Stang.

The ancient custom of riding the stang still lingers in some remote

parts of the country. Holding delinquents up to ridicule was a favourite

mode of punishment practised by our forefathers, and riding the stang

was the means generally employed for punishing husbands who beat their

wives, or allowed themselves to be henpecked, or were profligate in

their conduct. There are various designations for the custom. In

Yorkshire, riding the stang is the name used; in Scotland the same term

is applied; in the South of England skimmington-riding is the title

generally employed, and on the Continent it is known by other

appellations.

[Illustration: RIDING THE STANG.]

The mode of carrying out the ceremony is as follows: A man having beaten

his wife, the young men of the village assume the attitude of public

censors, and arrangements are made for riding the stang three nights in

succession. A trumpeter blows his horn loud and long as day gives way

to night, and the villagers are brought together. A pole or a ladder is

procured, and the most witty man in the village is placed thereon,

mounted shoulder-high, and carried in great state through the streets.

In one hand he has a large key or stick, and in the other a

dripping-pan, and leads the music of the crowd. Men, women, and children

join in the fun, and beat kettles, pans, pots, or anything else that

will make a noise; tin whistles, horns, and trumpets are blown, the

noise produced being better imagined than described. As soon as all is

ready, a start is made, and about every fifty yards the procession

stops, and the mounted man proclaims at the top of his voice a rhyme

suited to the nature of the offence, somewhat as follows:

"Ran, tan, tan; ran, tan, tan,

To the sound of this pan;

This is to give notice that Tom Trotter

Has beaten his good woman!

For what, and for why?

Because she ate when she was hungry,

And drank when she was dry.

Ran, tan, ran, tan, tan;

Hurrah--hurrah! for this good wo-man!

He beat her, he beat her, he beat her indeed,

For spending a penny when she had need.

He beat her black, he beat her blue;

When Old Nick gets him, he'll give him his due;

Ran, tan, tan; ran, tan, tan;

We'll send him there in this old frying-pan;

Hurrah--hurrah! for his good wo-man!"

Bygone Punishments · 第 12 / 14 段