220. When the forenames are the same arrange chronologically.

Again, no attention is to be paid to the titles _Sir_, etc. The

alphabetical principle is of no use here because no one can know

beforehand which of many possible titles we have taken to arrange by,

whereas some one may know when the author whom he is seeking lived. Of

course

«Brown, T. L.», comes before

«Brown», Thomas, for the same reason that

«Brown» comes before

«Browne.»

221. Forenames not generally used should be neglected in the

arrangement.

When an author is generally known by one of several forenames he will

be looked for by that alone, and that alone should determine the

arrangement, at least in a card catalogue. Instances are: «Agassiz»,

(J:) L: (Rudolph), «Cleveland», (Stephen) Grover, «Collins», (W:)

Wilkie, «Cook», (Flavius Josephus _known as_) Joseph, «Dobson», (H:)

Austin, «Doré», (Paul) Gustav. The form should be

«Harte», Bret (_full name_ Francis Bret), or «Harte», Bret

(_in full_ Francis Bret).

Make references whenever the omission of a name will change the

alphabetical arrangement, as from «Müller», F: Max, to «Müller», Max.

But if they are counted in arranging they should be spaced or

parenthesized, because when there are several persons with the same

family name the spacing or parenthesizing assists the eye in picking

out the right one. Thus if we have

«Franklin», John, _d._ 1759,

«Franklin», _Sir_ John, _d._ 1863,

«Franklin», John Andrew,

«Franklin», John Charles,

«Franklin», John D a v i d,

the reader not knowing of the name David would expect to find the last

among the simple Johns, but seeing the David spaced would understand

that it was a rarely used name. This supposes that he knows the

system, but one can not have a condensed catalogue without obliging

the reader to learn how to use it. (See § 140.) {85}

222. If an author uses both the shorter and the longer forms in

different works and yet is decidedly better known by the shorter,

arrange by that.

_Ex._ «Müller», Max (_in full_ F: Max). Otherwise give and arrange by

all the names.

223. If a person’s forenames occur differently in different books or

different authorities, or occur in a different order, or the person

has changed one or more of his forenames, arrange by one form (the

best known or the latest) and refer from the others if alphabetically

separated.

224. Arrange a nobleman’s title, under which entry is made, and the

name of a bishop’s see, from which reference is made to the family

name, among the personal names, not with the places.

_Ex._

«London», Alfred.

«London», David, _Bp. of_.

«London», John.

«London», _Conn._

«London», _Eng._

_not_ «London», John.

«London», David, _Bp. of_.

«London», _Conn._

_nor_ «London», John.

«London», _Conn._

«London», David, _Bp. of_.

«London», _Eng._

«Danby», John.

«Danby», Thomas «Osborne», _Earl of_.

«Danby», Wm.

«Danby», _Eng._

«Holland», C.

«Holland», H: E. «Fox-Vassal», _4th Baron_.

«Holland», H: R. «Fox-Vassal», _3d Baron_.

«Holland» [_the country_].

Rules for a Dictionary Catalogue U. S. Bureau of Education Special Report on Public Libraries—Part II, Third Edition · 第 123 / 241 题