«Prado, Museo del», _Madrid_. (Rule 2, _d_.)
«Pratt (Enoch) Free Library», _Balt., Md._ (Rule 2, _d_, _h_.)
«San Francisco. Mercantile Library Assoc.» (Rule 2, _b_.)
«Société de l’Agriculture de l’Orne», _Alençon_. (Rule 1.)
«Stationers’ Company», _London_. (Rule 1, exc. 2.)
«Templars, Knights.» (Rule 2, exc. 4.)
«Tübingen. Eberhard-Karls Universität.» (Rule 1, exc. 1.)
«L’Union Générale», _Paris_. (Rule 2, _c_.)
«United States. Library of Congress.» (§ 40.)
«Vatican Council.» (§ 53.)
«Verona, Congress of.» (§ 49.)
«Versailles, Treaty of.» _See ——._ (§ 50.)
«Wisconsin, State Historical Society of.» (Rule 1, exc. 5.)
The 6TH PLAN has the same rules as the 5TH, and _no_ exceptions. It
may be preferred by those who think the advantage of having a single
uniform rule greater than the inconvenience of unusual headings.
Perhaps from habit I prefer the 4TH PLAN. Of the other plans experience
confirms me in the belief that the 5TH PLAN is the best. The A. L.
A. adopted the 6TH PLAN. I have used it ever since in the _Library
journal_, and I do not think it works well.
[note] 27. They are now arranged under Academies in a single alphabet
of places, so that the latter—the most serious—objection does not
apply.[/note]
[note] 28. That is learned academies like the French Academy, not high
schools.[/note]